Structure and Expression of Hox-2.2, a Murine Homeobox-Containing Gene

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Structure and Expression of Hox-2.2, a Murine Homeobox-Containing Gene Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 85, pp. 5582-5586, August 1988 Developmental Biology Structure and expression of Hox-2.2, a murine homeobox-containing gene (development/in situ hybridization/Hox 2.1 gene/amino terminus/conserved hexapeptide) KLAUS SCHUGHART*, MANUEL F. UTSETt, ALEXANDER AWGULEWITSCH*, AND FRANK H. RUDDLE*t Departments of *Biology and tHuman Genetics, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06511 Contributed by Frank H. Ruddle, April 1, 1988 ABSTRACT The Hox-2.2 gene is one of a cluster of terns of the Hox-2.2 gene with that of the Hox-2.1 gene in the homeobox-containing genes on mouse chromosome 11. A developing central nervous system. cDNA clone containing theHox-2.2 homeobox has been isolated from an adult spinal cord library. Our analysis of the Hox-2.2 MATERIAL AND METHODS cDNA and genomic clones indicates that there are at least two exons and one intron. The largest open reading frame includes Isolation and Sequencing of cDNA Clones. Approximately 4 the homeobox and codes for a 224 amino acid protein of x 105 AgtlO recombinant phage clones representing a cDNA molecular weight 25,312. Comparisons of the predicted Hox- library from polyadenylylated RNA of adult murine spinal 2.2 protein with other homeodomain-containing proteins re- cord (A.A., unpublished work) were screened with a 353-bp vealed four regions of sequence similiarity: an N-terminal genomic Hae III-fragment of the Hox-2.2 gene (ref. 12 and octapeptide, a hexapeptide upstream of the homeodomain, the Fig. 2; bp 556-908) containing the Hox-2.2 homeobox. homeodomain, and a glutamic acid-rich region at the C Overlapping fragments suitable for DNA sequencing were terminus. Possible functions ofthese regions are discussed. The prepared from the isolated cDNA by treatment with BAL-31 Hox-2.2 gene is expressed in 13.5-day embryos in the devel- exonuclease and subcloned as described (14) into vectors oping hindbrain and spinal cord. The expression patterns of pGEM-4 and pGEM-3 (Promega Biotec, Madison, WI) or a Hox-2.2 and Hox-2.1 in 13.5-day embryos are compared. pGEM derivative (a gift of L.D. Bogarad, Yale University). The nucleotide sequences from both strands ofthe cDNA and In Drosophila melanogaster a highly conserved DNA region from some genomic DNA fragments (Fig. 1) were determined been in by the dideoxy method (15, 16). Sequence analyses and of 183 base pairs (bp), the homeobox, has identified comparisons were performed with programs provided by several genes affecting embryonic development of the fruit DNAStar (Madison, WI) and the University of Wisconsin fly, including maternal-effect genes, segmentation genes, and Genetics Computer Group (17). homeotic genes (reviewed in refs. 1 and 2). Maternal-effect In Situ Hybridization. In situ hybridization to cryostat genes specify the spatial coordinates ofthe egg, segmentation sections of 13.5-day-postcoitus embryos was performed with genes determine the number and polarity of body segments, 35S-labeled single-stranded RNA probes (18). Two restriction and each of the homeotic genes is required for the proper fragments were cloned into pGEM plasmids to prepare morphogenesis of a distinct region along the anterior-poste- probes specific for Hox-2.2 transcripts and negative control rior axis. To a first approximation, the region-specific func- probes of the opposite orientation: the 353-bp genomic Hae tions of Drosophila homeobox genes can be superimposed III fragment containing the Hox-2.2 homeobox and the onto their region-specific patterns of expression (1, 2). 511-bp upstream EcoRI-fragment (Figs. 1 and 2) from the Homeobox genes have also been detected in many other cDNA. The 511-bp cDNA probe does not contain homeobox species, including mouse and human (3). The homeobox sequences. The Hox-2.1 probe, a 265-bp genomic Hae III sequence codes for a protein domain that exhibits structural fragment containing the homeobox, was described previ- similiarity to certain prokaryotyic and eukaryotic DNA- ously (18). binding proteins (4, 5). Experiments that show nuclear localization of homeodomain proteins (refs. 6 and 7 and references therein) and the specific DNA-binding properties RESULTS AND DISCUSSION of homeodomain-containing fusion proteins (8, 9) suggest a Structure of the Hox-2.2 mRNA and Protein. RNA blot role for homeodomain proteins in controlling gene expres- hybridizations detected a Hox-2.2-specific transcript of 1.5 sion. Most of the 15 homeobox loci described in the mouse kilobases (kb) in 13.5-day mouse embryos (13) and spinal genome are organized in two gene clusters on chromosomes cord of adult mice (data not shown). Therefore, a cDNA 6 and 11 (reviewed in ref. 10). The Hox-2 cluster on library prepared from spinal cord poly(A)+ RNA of adult chromosome 11 contains at least 6 homeobox genes (10, 11). mice was screened with a DNA fragment containing the Previous reports described the homeobox sequences of the Hox-2.2 homeobox. Offour cDNA clones isolated, clone c5, Hox-2.2, Hox-2.3, and Hox-2.4 genes (12) and demonstrated which contained the largest insert and hybridized to the their expression in mouse embryos (13). genomic Hox-2.2 DNA (3.2-kb and 2.4-kb EcoRI-Hind III In order to understand their functions during murine fragments; Fig. 1) was selected for further analysis. Sequence development, a detailed analysis of homeobox gene tran- analyses of clone c5 and of appropriate genomic DNA scripts, gene products, and specific patterns of expression is fragments have enabled us to describe the entire coding required. In this paper we present the complete amino acid region of a Hox-2.2 transcript, to identify two exons and one sequence of a Hox-2.2 protein,t as predicted from a cDNA intron, and to predict a putative polyadenylylation signal clone, and we compare the region-specific expression pat- (Figs. 1 and 2) These data can account for a Hox-2.2 transcript The publication costs of this article were defrayed in part by page charge tThe sequence reported in this paper is being deposited in the payment. This article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" EMBL/GenBank data base (IntelliGenetics, Mountain View, CA, in accordance with 18 U.S.C. §1734 solely to indicate this fact. and Eur. Mol. Biol. Lab., Heidelberg) (accession no. J03782). 5582 Downloaded by guest on September 26, 2021 Developmental Biology: Schughart et al. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 85 (1988) 5583 4.- The 8 N-terminal amino acid residues of the Hox-2.2 -40. .0- protein are highly conserved in the N-terminal regions of II several other homeodomain proteins (Fig. 3A), including H P P Pv E Pv P H B mouse Hox-1.3 (7, 21), mouse Hox-2.1 (20), mouse Hox-3.1 (ref. 22 and A.A., unpublished data), human c13 (23), and 0.5kb I-H Drosophila Antp (24). The N termini of other homeodomain Rox-2.2 proteins, such as Xenopus Xhox-1A (25), Drosophila Ubx c:5 (1 ..4kb) Pv E p (26), and Drosophila Dfd (27), are less conserved. The N termini ofthe mouse Hox-1.1 (6). mouse Hox-2.3 (28), human cl (29), Xenopus XIHbox 2 (30), and Xenopus Xhox-36 (31) 51 3' proteins, representing related homeodomain proteins (30), FIG. 1. Restriction map of the Hox-2.2 genomic region and can be grouped into a second class of N termini. The schematic representation of the isolated cDNA. The open reading conservation of N-terminal regions among different homeo- frame is represented by open boxes. Stippled boxes indicate the box genes of widely diverged species suggests an important homeobox region. Abbreviations for restriction enzymes: E, EcoRI; functional role for the N terminus, perhaps in intracellular B, BamHl; P, Pst I; Pv, Pvu II. Arrows above the genomic map localization. The N-terminal region of the yeast MATa2 indicate which genomic regions have been sequenced. Open arrow homeodomain protein, for example, is necessary for its indicates the direction of transcription. transport to the nucleus (35). The predicted Hox-2.2 amino acid sequence also contains of 1.4 kb with an open reading frame of 672 bp, preceded by a highly conserved hexapeptide 14 amino acid residues a 5' untranslated region of 109 bp and followed by a 3' upstream ofthe homeodomain (residues 127-132, Fig. 2). The untranslated region of about 650 bp. The structure and sequence and position of these hexapeptides, originally organization of mouse Hox-2.2 shows several similiarities to described by Mavilio et al. (23) are conserved in a number of other homeobox genes within the coding region and the homeodomain proteins (Fig. 3B). As shown at the bottom of untranslated regions. Fig. 3B, the Hox-2.2 hexapeptide is almost identical to a The predicted Hox-2.2 protein. Based on our sequence conserved ,-type globin sequence (30, 36) that is involved in analyses of cDNA clone c5, the entire amino acid sequence protein-protein interactions between al and ,82 subunits (34). of a putative Hox-2.2 protein can be predicted (Fig. 2). The This suggests that a possible function of this hexapeptide in largest open reading frame in clone c5 is in-frame with the homeodomain proteins is to influence protein-protein inter- homeobox and codes for a protein of 224 amino acids with a actions and thereby modify the DNA-binding properties of calculated molecular weight of 25,312. In addition to the possible multimeric homeodomain proteins. Interestingly, Antennapedia-class homeodomain (12), the 224 amino acid alternatively spliced transcripts of the Drosophila Ubx gene Hox-2.2 protein contains three regions conserved with other that differ in the spacing between the hexapeptide and the homeodomain proteins.
Recommended publications
  • Segmentation in Vertebrates: Clock and Gradient Finally Joined
    Downloaded from genesdev.cshlp.org on September 24, 2021 - Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press REVIEW Segmentation in vertebrates: clock and gradient finally joined Alexander Aulehla1 and Bernhard G. Herrmann2 Max-Planck-Institute for Molecular Genetics, Department of Developmental Genetics, 14195 Berlin, Germany The vertebral column is derived from somites formed by terior (A–P) axis. Somite formation takes place periodi- segmentation of presomitic mesoderm, a fundamental cally in a fixed anterior-to-posterior sequence. process of vertebrate embryogenesis. Models on the In the chick embryo, a new somite is formed approxi- mechanism controlling this process date back some mately every 90 min, whereas in the mouse embryo, the three to four decades. Access to understanding the mo- periodicity varies, dependent on the axial position (Tam lecular control of somitogenesis has been gained only 1981). Classical embryology experiments revealed that recently by the discovery of molecular oscillators (seg- periodicity and directionality of somite formation are mentation clock) and gradients of signaling molecules, controlled by an intrinsic program set off in the cells as as predicted by early models. The Notch signaling path- they are recruited into the psm. For instance, when the way is linked to the oscillator and plays a decisive role in psm is inverted rostro–caudally, somite formation in the inter- and intrasomitic boundary formation. An Fgf8 sig- inverted region proceeds from caudal to rostral, main- naling gradient is involved in somite size control. And taining the original direction (Christ et al. 1974). More- the (canonical) Wnt signaling pathway, driven by Wnt3a, over, neither the transversal bisection nor the isolation appears to integrate clock and gradient in a global of the psm from all surrounding tissues stops the seg- mechanism controlling the segmentation process.
    [Show full text]
  • Perspectives
    Copyright 0 1994 by the Genetics Society of America Perspectives Anecdotal, Historical and Critical Commentaries on Genetics Edited by James F. Crow and William F. Dove A Century of Homeosis, A Decade of Homeoboxes William McGinnis Department of Molecular Biophysics and Biochemistry, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut 06520-8114 NE hundred years ago, while the science of genet- ing mammals, and were proposed to encode DNA- 0 ics still existed only in the yellowing reprints of a binding homeodomainsbecause of a faint resemblance recently deceased Moravian abbot, WILLIAMBATESON to mating-type transcriptional regulatory proteins of (1894) coined the term homeosis to define a class of budding yeast and an even fainter resemblance to bac- biological variations in whichone elementof a segmen- terial helix-turn-helix transcriptional regulators. tally repeated array of organismal structures is trans- The initial stream of papers was a prelude to a flood formed toward the identity of another. After the redis- concerning homeobox genes and homeodomain pro- coveryof MENDEL’Sgenetic principles, BATESONand teins, a flood that has channeled into a steady river of others (reviewed in BATESON1909) realized that some homeo-publications, fed by many tributaries. A major examples of homeosis in floral organs and animal skel- reason for the continuing flow of studies is that many etons could be attributed to variation in genes. Soon groups, working on disparate lines of research, have thereafter, as the discipline of Drosophila genetics was found themselves swept up in the currents when they born and was evolving into a formidable intellectual found that their favorite protein contained one of the force enriching many biologicalsubjects, it gradually be- many subtypes of homeodomain.
    [Show full text]
  • PAPC Couples the Segmentation Clock to Somite Morphogenesis by Regulating N-Cadherin-Dependent Adhesion
    © 2017. Published by The Company of Biologists Ltd | Development (2017) 144, 664-676 doi:10.1242/dev.143974 RESEARCH ARTICLE PAPC couples the segmentation clock to somite morphogenesis by regulating N-cadherin-dependent adhesion Jérome Chal1,2,3,4,5,*, Charlenè Guillot3,4,* and Olivier Pourquié1,2,3,4,5,6,7,‡ ABSTRACT specific level of the PSM called the determination front. The Vertebrate segmentation is characterized by the periodic formation of determination front is defined as a signaling threshold epithelial somites from the mesenchymal presomitic mesoderm implemented by posterior gradients of Wnt and FGF (Aulehla (PSM). How the rhythmic signaling pulse delivered by the et al., 2003; Diez del Corral and Storey, 2004; Dubrulle et al., segmentation clock is translated into the periodic morphogenesis of 2001; Hubaud and Pourquie, 2014; Sawada et al., 2001). Cells of somites remains poorly understood. Here, we focused on the role of the posterior PSM exhibit mesenchymal characteristics and paraxial protocadherin (PAPC/Pcdh8) in this process. We showed express Snail-related transcription factors (Dale et al., 2006; that in chicken and mouse embryos, PAPC expression is tightly Nieto, 2002). In the anterior PSM, cells downregulate snail/slug regulated by the clock and wavefront system in the posterior PSM. We expression and upregulate epithelialization-promoting factors such observed that PAPC exhibits a striking complementary pattern to N- as paraxis (Barnes et al., 1997; Sosic et al., 1997). This molecular cadherin (CDH2), marking the interface of the future somite boundary transition correlates with the anterior PSM cells progressively in the anterior PSM. Gain and loss of function of PAPC in chicken acquiring epithelial characteristics (Duband et al., 1987; Martins embryos disrupted somite segmentation by altering the CDH2- et al., 2009).
    [Show full text]
  • REVIEW Cell and Molecular Biology of Notch
    459 REVIEW Cell and molecular biology of Notch Ulla-Maj Fiu´za and Alfonso Martinez Arias Department of Genetics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3EH, UK (Correspondence should be addressed to U-M Fiu´za; Email: [email protected]) Abstract Notch signalling is a cell–cell communication process, which complexity which could account for the multitude of roles it has allows the establishment of patterns of gene expression and during development and in adult organisms. In this review, we differentiation, regulates binary cell fate choice and the will describe the multiple roles of Notch and how various factors maintenance of stem cell populations. So far, the data published can regulate Notch signalling. has elucidated the main players in the Notch signalling pathway. Journal of Endocrinology (2007) 194, 459–474 However, its regulatory mechanisms are exhibiting an increasing The structure of Notch and the Notch signalling which allowed the discovery of a core set of molecules involved pathway in Notch signalling and lead to the understanding of how they organize into a signalling pathway. The Notch genes encode members of a family of receptors that In mammals, there are four Notch genes and five genes mediate short-range signalling events. A prototypical Notch encoding ligands, three Delta-like and two Jagged (Fig. 1). In gene encodes a single transmembrane receptor composed in Drosophila, there is only one Notch-encoding gene, one Delta its extracellular region of a conserved array of up to 36 and one Jagged homologue (Serrate; Maine et al. 1995, epidermal growth factor (EGF)-like repeats, involved in Lissemore & Starmer 1999).
    [Show full text]
  • Transformations of Lamarckism Vienna Series in Theoretical Biology Gerd B
    Transformations of Lamarckism Vienna Series in Theoretical Biology Gerd B. M ü ller, G ü nter P. Wagner, and Werner Callebaut, editors The Evolution of Cognition , edited by Cecilia Heyes and Ludwig Huber, 2000 Origination of Organismal Form: Beyond the Gene in Development and Evolutionary Biology , edited by Gerd B. M ü ller and Stuart A. Newman, 2003 Environment, Development, and Evolution: Toward a Synthesis , edited by Brian K. Hall, Roy D. Pearson, and Gerd B. M ü ller, 2004 Evolution of Communication Systems: A Comparative Approach , edited by D. Kimbrough Oller and Ulrike Griebel, 2004 Modularity: Understanding the Development and Evolution of Natural Complex Systems , edited by Werner Callebaut and Diego Rasskin-Gutman, 2005 Compositional Evolution: The Impact of Sex, Symbiosis, and Modularity on the Gradualist Framework of Evolution , by Richard A. Watson, 2006 Biological Emergences: Evolution by Natural Experiment , by Robert G. B. Reid, 2007 Modeling Biology: Structure, Behaviors, Evolution , edited by Manfred D. Laubichler and Gerd B. M ü ller, 2007 Evolution of Communicative Flexibility: Complexity, Creativity, and Adaptability in Human and Animal Communication , edited by Kimbrough D. Oller and Ulrike Griebel, 2008 Functions in Biological and Artifi cial Worlds: Comparative Philosophical Perspectives , edited by Ulrich Krohs and Peter Kroes, 2009 Cognitive Biology: Evolutionary and Developmental Perspectives on Mind, Brain, and Behavior , edited by Luca Tommasi, Mary A. Peterson, and Lynn Nadel, 2009 Innovation in Cultural Systems: Contributions from Evolutionary Anthropology , edited by Michael J. O ’ Brien and Stephen J. Shennan, 2010 The Major Transitions in Evolution Revisited , edited by Brett Calcott and Kim Sterelny, 2011 Transformations of Lamarckism: From Subtle Fluids to Molecular Biology , edited by Snait B.
    [Show full text]
  • Rapid Changes in Morphogen Concentration Control Self-Organized
    RESEARCH COMMUNICATION Rapid changes in morphogen concentration control self-organized patterning in human embryonic stem cells Idse Heemskerk1†, Kari Burt1, Matthew Miller1, Sapna Chhabra2, M Cecilia Guerra1, Lizhong Liu1, Aryeh Warmflash1,3* 1Department of Biosciences, Rice University, Houston, United States; 2Systems, Synthetic and Physical Biology Program, Rice University, Houston, United States; 3Department of Bioengineering, Rice University, Houston, United States Abstract During embryonic development, diffusible signaling molecules called morphogens are thought to determine cell fates in a concentration-dependent way. Yet, in mammalian embryos, concentrations change rapidly compared to the time for making cell fate decisions. Here, we use human embryonic stem cells (hESCs) to address how changing morphogen levels influence differentiation, focusing on how BMP4 and Nodal signaling govern the cell-fate decisions associated with gastrulation. We show that BMP4 response is concentration dependent, but that expression of many Nodal targets depends on rate of concentration change. Moreover, in a self- organized stem cell model for human gastrulation, expression of these genes follows rapid changes in endogenous Nodal signaling. Our study shows a striking contrast between the specific ways ligand dynamics are interpreted by two closely related signaling pathways, highlighting both the *For correspondence: subtlety and importance of morphogen dynamics for understanding mammalian embryogenesis [email protected] and designing optimized protocols for directed stem cell differentiation. Editorial note: This article has been through an editorial process in which the authors decide how † Present address: Department to respond to the issues raised during peer review. The Reviewing Editor’s assessment is that all of Cell and Developmental the issues have been addressed (see decision letter).
    [Show full text]
  • Epigenetics of Floral Homeotic Genes in Relation to Sexual Dimorphism in the 2 Dioecious Plant Mercurialis Annua
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/481481; this version posted November 29, 2018. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. 1 Epigenetics of floral homeotic genes in relation to sexual dimorphism in the 2 dioecious plant Mercurialis annua 3 4 Janardan Khadka1, Narendra Singh Yadav1†, Micha Guy1, Gideon Grafi1* and Avi Golan- 5 Goldhirsh1* 6 1French Associates Institute for Agriculture and Biotechnology of Drylands, Jacob Blaustein 7 Institutes for Desert Research, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Midreshet Ben Gurion 8 84990, Israel. 9 †Present address: Department of Biological Sciences, University of Lethbridge, AB T1K 10 3M4, Canada. 11 * To whom correspondence should be addressed 12 13 14 Highlights 15 Sex determination in Mercurialis annua is not related to epigenetics of floral homeotic genes 16 but appears to be modulated by an unknown gender-specific regulator(s) that affects hormonal 17 homeostasis. 18 1 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/481481; this version posted November 29, 2018. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. 19 Abstract 20 In plants, dioecy characterizes species carrying male and female flowers on separate plants 21 and occurs in about 6% of angiosperms. To date, the molecular mechanism(s) underlying 22 sexual dimorphism is essentially unknown. The ability of gender-reversal by hormone 23 application suggests that epigenetics might play an important role in sexual dimorphism.
    [Show full text]
  • Phenotypic and Molecular Analysis of Mes-3, a Maternal-Effect Gene Required for Proliferation and Viability of the Germ Line in C
    Copyright 0 1995 by the Genetics Society of America Phenotypic and Molecular Analysis of mes-3, a Maternal-Effect Gene Required for Proliferation and Viability of the Germ Line in C. eleguns Janet E. Paulsen,' Elizabeth E. Capowski2 and Susan Strome Department of Biology, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana 47405 Manuscript received July 24, 1995 Accepted for publication September 14, 1995 ABSTRACT mes-3 is one of four maternaleffect sterile genes that encode maternal components required for normal postembryonic development of the germ line in Caenorhabditis elegans. mes-3 mutant mothers produce sterile progeny, which contain few germ cells andno gametes. This terminal phenotype reflects two problems: reduced proliferation of the germ line and germ cell death. Both the appearanceof the dying germ cells and the results of genetic tests indicate that germ cells in mes-3 animals undergo a necrotic-like death, not programmedcell death. The few germ cells that appear healthyin mes-3 worms do not differentiateinto gametes, even after eliminationof the signaling pathway that normally maintains the undifferentiated population of germ cells. Thus, mes-3 encodes a maternally supplied product that is required both for proliferation of the germ line and for maintenance of viable germ cells that are competent to differentiate into gametes. Cloning and molecular characterizationof mes-3 revealed that it is the upstream gene in an operon. The genes in the operon display parallel expression patterns; transcripts are present throughout development and are not restricted to germ-line tissue. Both mes-3 and the downstream gene in the operon encode novel proteins. HE germ line enables metazoan organisms to pro- germ cell, P4, at the 16-24cell stage.
    [Show full text]
  • Involvement Ofnotchanddeltagenes in Spider Segmentation
    letters to nature 4. Urick, R. J. Principles of Underwater Sound (McGraw Hill, New York, 1983). as arthropods, vertebrates and annelids, that are not closely related in 5. Henson, O. W. Jr The activity and function of the middle ear muscles in echolocating bats. J. Physiol. current phylogenies10. The complexity of generating a segmented (Lond.) 180, 871–887 (1965). 6. Suga, N. & Jen, P. H. S. Peripheral control of acoustic signals in the auditory system of echolocating body plan might argue for a common origin of segmentation and a bats. J. Exp. Biol. 62, 277–331 (1975). common genetic programme1,2. In the past two decades, however, 7. Au, W. W. L. The Sonar of Dolphins (Springer, New York, 1993). genetic analyses in the fruitfly Drosophila3,4 and in various vertebrates 8. Au, W. W. L., Ford, J. K. B. & Allman, K. A. Echolocation signals of foraging killer whales (Orcinus 7–9,11–14 orca). J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 111, 2343–2344 (2002). such as mouse, chick and zebrafish suggest that fundamentally 9. Rasmussen, M. H., Miller, L. A. & Au, W. W. L. Source levels of clicks from free-ranging white beaked different mechanisms and gene networks are involved in arthropod dolphins (Lagenorhynchus albirostris Gray 1846) recorded in Icelandic waters. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 111, and vertebrate segmentation. Drosophila segments are generated by a 1122–1125 (2002). successive spatial refinement along the anterior–posterior axis under 10. Ketten, D. R. in Hearing by Whales and Dolphins (eds Au, W. W. L., Popper, A. N. & Fay, R. R.) 43–108 3,4 (Springer, New York, 2000).
    [Show full text]
  • Stages of Embryonic Development of the Zebrafish
    DEVELOPMENTAL DYNAMICS 2032553’10 (1995) Stages of Embryonic Development of the Zebrafish CHARLES B. KIMMEL, WILLIAM W. BALLARD, SETH R. KIMMEL, BONNIE ULLMANN, AND THOMAS F. SCHILLING Institute of Neuroscience, University of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon 97403-1254 (C.B.K., S.R.K., B.U., T.F.S.); Department of Biology, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH 03755 (W.W.B.) ABSTRACT We describe a series of stages for Segmentation Period (10-24 h) 274 development of the embryo of the zebrafish, Danio (Brachydanio) rerio. We define seven broad peri- Pharyngula Period (24-48 h) 285 ods of embryogenesis-the zygote, cleavage, blas- Hatching Period (48-72 h) 298 tula, gastrula, segmentation, pharyngula, and hatching periods. These divisions highlight the Early Larval Period 303 changing spectrum of major developmental pro- Acknowledgments 303 cesses that occur during the first 3 days after fer- tilization, and we review some of what is known Glossary 303 about morphogenesis and other significant events that occur during each of the periods. Stages sub- References 309 divide the periods. Stages are named, not num- INTRODUCTION bered as in most other series, providing for flexi- A staging series is a tool that provides accuracy in bility and continued evolution of the staging series developmental studies. This is because different em- as we learn more about development in this spe- bryos, even together within a single clutch, develop at cies. The stages, and their names, are based on slightly different rates. We have seen asynchrony ap- morphological features, generally readily identi- pearing in the development of zebrafish, Danio fied by examination of the live embryo with the (Brachydanio) rerio, embryos fertilized simultaneously dissecting stereomicroscope.
    [Show full text]
  • Genetic and Maternal Effect Influences on Viability of Common Frog
    Heredity (2003) 91, 117–124 & 2003 Nature Publishing Group All rights reserved 0018-067X/03 $25.00 www.nature.com/hdy Genetic and maternal effect influences on viability of common frog tadpoles under different environmental conditions S Pakkasmaa1, J Merila¨2 and RB O’Hara2,3 1Department of Population Biology, Evolutionary Biology Centre, Uppsala University, Norbyva¨gen 18D, SE-75236 Uppsala, Sweden; 2Ecological Genetics Research Unit, Department of Ecology and Systematics, PO Box 65, FIN-00014 University of Helsinki, Finland; 3Rolf Nevanlinna Institute, PO Box 4, FIN-00014 University of Helsinki, Finland The influence of environmental stress on the expression of all traits were significant, independent of pH treatments and genetic and maternal effects on the viability traits has seldom typically of magnitude similar to the additive genetic effects. been assessed in wild vertebrates. We have estimated Maternal effects were large for all traits, especially for genetic and maternal effects on the viability (viz probability of viability itself, and their expression was partly dependent survival, probability of being deformed, and body size and on the environment. In the case of body size, the maternal shape) of common frog, Rana temporaria, tadpoles under effects were mediated largely through egg size. In general, stressful (low pH) and nonstressful (neutral pH) environ- the results give little evidence for the conjecture that mental conditions. A Bayesian analysis using generalized environmental stress created by low pH would impact linear mixed models was applied to data from a factorial strongly on the genetic architecture of fitness-related traits laboratory experiment. The expression of additive genetic in frogs, and hamper adaptation to stress caused by variance was independent of pH treatments, and all traits acidification.
    [Show full text]
  • Maternal Variants in NLRP and Other Maternal Effect Proteins Are
    Epigenetics J Med Genet: first published as 10.1136/jmedgenet-2017-105190 on 24 March 2018. Downloaded from ORIGINAL ARTICLE Maternal variants in NLRP and other maternal effect proteins are associated with multilocus imprinting disturbance in offspring Matthias Begemann,1 Faisal I Rezwan,2 Jasmin Beygo,3 Louise E Docherty,4 Julia Kolarova,5 Christopher Schroeder,3 Karin Buiting,3 Kamal Chokkalingam,6 Franziska Degenhardt,7 Emma L Wakeling,8 Stephanie Kleinle,9 Daniela González Fassrainer,9 Barbara Oehl-Jaschkowitz,10 Claire L S Turner,11 Michal Patalan,12 Maria Gizewska,12 Gerhard Binder,13 Can Thi Bich Ngoc,14 Vu Chi Dung,14 Sarju G Mehta,15 Gareth Baynam,16,17 Julian P Hamilton-Shield,18 Sara Aljareh,2 Oluwakemi Lokulo-Sodipe,2,19 Rachel Horton,2,19 Reiner Siebert,5 Miriam Elbracht,1 Isabel Karen Temple,2,19 Thomas Eggermann,1 Deborah J G Mackay2 ► Additional material is ABSTRact overgrowth, macroglossia, exomphalos, hemihy- published online only. To view Background Genomic imprinting results from pertrophy and predisposition to Wilms tumour), please visit the journal online (http:// dx. doi. org/ 10. 1136/ the resistance of germline epigenetic marks to the growth restriction disorders Silver-Russell jmedgenet- 2017- 105190). reprogramming in the early embryo for a small syndrome (SRS; restricted growth, asymmetry and number of mammalian genes. Genetic, epigenetic or poor feeding) and Temple syndrome (TS; growth For numbered affiliations see environmental insults that prevent imprints from evading restriction, poor feeding, early puberty and obesity) end of article. reprogramming may result in imprinting disorders, which and transient neonatal diabetes mellitus (TNDM; impact growth, development, behaviour and metabolism.
    [Show full text]