DOCSLIB.ORG

BEAZLEY FOUNDATION, INC. 2005 GIFTS and GRANTS PAID As of December 31, 2005

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
BEAZLEY FOUNDATION, INC. 2005 GIFTS and GRANTS PAID As of December 31, 2005 BEAZLEY FOUNDATION, INC. 2005 GIFTS AND GRANTS PAID As of December 31, 2005 The Academy of Music $ 15,000.00 902 Colonial Avenue Norfolk, VA 23507 PURPOSE: Park View Elementary Strings Program May 2005, September 2005 ACCESS College Foundation $58,500.00 800 E. City Hall Avenue Norfolk, VA 23501 PURPOSE: Program Services within Chesapeake Public Schools November 2005 An Achievable Dream $25,000.00 10858 Warwick Blvd. Newport News, VA 23601-3741 PURPOSE: 2005/06 Operating Expenses July 2005 Bon Secours Maryview Foundation $65,000.00 3636 High Street Portsmouth, VA 23707 PURPOSE: Women’s Wellness Program Camp Holiday Trails $ 5,000.00 P.O. Box 15425 Charlottesville, VA 22905 PURPOSE: Camperships for Portsmouth students Cape Henry Collegiate School $25,000.00 1320 Mill Dam Road Virginia Beach, VA 23454 PURPOSE: Construction of Science and Technology Center Cerebral Palsy of Virginia $28,586.00 5825 Arrowhead Drive, Suite 201 Virginia Beach, VA 23462 PURPOSE: Part-time Staff Chesapeake Bay Academy $50,000.00 821 Baker Road Virginia Beach, VA 23462 PURPOSE: Education Center July 2005 Chesapeake Bay Foundation $35,000.00 6 Herndon Avenue Annapolis, MD 21403 PURPOSE: Portsmouth Public Schools On-the-Water Field Experiences Chesapeake Care Free Clinic $80,000.00 2145 S. Military Highway Chesapeake, VA 23320-4426 PURPOSE: New technology initiative July 2005 Chesapeake Health Foundation $100,000.00 736 Battlefield Blvd. Chesapeake, VA 23320 PURPOSE: Capital Campaign – Cancer Services Expansion April 2005 Chesapeake Service Systems, Inc. $50,000.00 1100 Executive Blvd. Chesapeake, VA 23320 PURPOSE: Capital Campaign April 2005 Children’s Hospital of the King’s Daughters $25,000.00 601 Children’s Lane Norfolk, VA 23507 PURPOSE: Child Abuse Program July 2005 CHIP/Healthy Families Chesapeake $25,000.00 2404 N. Battlefield Blvd., Suite 104 Chesapeake, VA 23325 PURPOSE: Expansion and Enhancements November 2005 The College Fund/UNCF $10,000.00 1001 E. Main Street, Suite 206 Richmond, VA 23219 PURPOSE: Beazley Foundation Endowed Scholarship Community Resource Network of Chesapeake, Inc. $25,000.00 P.O. Box 7475 Chesapeake, VA 23324-7475 PURPOSE: Operating Expenses November 2005 Cornerstone Christian School $ 9,000.00 1212 Willow Avenue Chesapeake, VA 23325 PURPOSE: New student computers The Corporation for Jefferson’s Poplar Forest $25,000.00 P.O. Box 419 Forest, VA 24551 PURPOSE: Archaeological Investigation and Interpretation July 2005 Eastern Virginia Medical School $100,000.00 P.O. Box 1980 Norfolk, VA 23501 PURPOSE: Cancer Research Laboratory April 2001 The Elizabeth River Project $30,000.00 475 Water Street, Suite 103A Portsmouth, VA 23704 PURPOSE: Teacher-in-Residence Project Foodbank of Southeastern Virginia $20,000.00 P.O. Box 1940 Norfolk, VA 23501 PURPOSE: Refrigerated Truck The Foundation Center $ 1,500.00 79 Fifth Avenue New York, NY 10003 PURPOSE: Operating Expenses Friends of the Portsmouth Juvenile Court, Inc. $12,000.00 600 Crawford Parkway, Suite 200 Portsmouth, VA 23704 PURPOSE: Community Service Program Great Bridge Battlefield & Waterways History Foundation $50,000.00 P.O. Box 15425 Chesapeake, VA 23378 PURPOSE: Capital Campaign Museum and Visitor Center July 2004 Hope House Foundation $34,400.00 801 Boush Street, Suite 302 Norfolk, VA 23510 PURPOSE: Renovations to Craddock Apartment Complex April 2005 Horizons – Hampton Roads Student Enrichment Program $ 6,000.00 1320 Mill Dam Road Virginia Beach, VA 23454 PURPOSE: Summer Enrichment Program – 7th graders Isle of Wight Academy $15,000.00 17111 Courthouse Highway Isle of Wight, VA 23397 PURPOSE: Building Expansion Jacob’s Ladder $15,000.00 P.O. Box 555 Urbanna, VA 23175 PURPOSE: Operating Expenses Judeo-Christian Outreach Center $50,000.00 1053 Virginia Beach Blvd. Virginia Beach, VA 23451 PURPOSE: Expansion and Relocation November 2005 City of Norfolk $ 5,000.00 508 City Hall Building 810 Union Street Norfolk, VA 23510 PURPOSE: Baseball Tomorrow Fund Norfolk Senior Center $10,000.00 7300 Newport Avenue, Suite 100 Norfolk, VA 23505 PURPOSE: New telephone system October 2005 Park Place Child Life Center $10,000.00 104 West Arden Circle Norfolk, VA 23505 PURPOSE: Classroom equipment November 2005 Park Place School $15,000.00 509 West 35th Street Norfolk, VA 23508 PURPOSE: Capital Improvements Patrick Henry Boys & Girls Plantation, Inc. $5,000.00 860 Red Hill Road Brookneal, VA 24528-1398 PURPOSE: Construction of staff housing July 2005 PORTCO, Inc. $20,890.00 800 Loudon Street Portsmouth, VA 23707 PURPOSE: 15-passenger van April 2005 Portsmouth Community Foundation $35,000.00 P.O. Box 1395 Portsmouth, VA 23705 PURPOSE: Impact Fund, Hurricane Katrina Relief April 2004, October 2005 Portsmouth Community Health Center $200,000.00 P.O. Box 338 Portsmouth, VA 23705 PURPOSE: Beazley Dental Clinic Portsmouth Crime Line $ 2,000.00 711 Crawford Street Portsmouth, VA 23704 PURPOSE: Operating Expenses Portsmouth Public Schools $93,000.00 3651 Hartford Street Portsmouth, VA 23707 PURPOSE: Beazley Scholarships Portsmouth Schools Foundation $25,000.00 P.O. Box 998 Portsmouth, VA 23705 PURPOSE: Portsmouth Public Schools Athletic Equipment and Uniforms April 2005 Portsmouth Schools Foundation $75,000.00 801 Crawford Street Portsmouth, VA 23704 PURPOSE: ACCESS Program in Portsmouth Portsmouth Self Sufficiency Project $41,540.00 P.O. Box 1394 Portsmouth, VA 23705 PURPOSE: Oasis Opportunity Center Project Lifesaver International, Inc. $ 2,838.00 815 Battlefield Blvd. S. Chesapeake, VA 23322 PURPOSE: Computer System St. Christopher School $ 8,772.00 P.O. Box 6103 Portsmouth, VA 23703 PURPOSE: Lease space for 4th and 5th grades Seton Youth Shelter $25,000.00 642 N. Lynnhaven Road Virginia Beach, VA 23452 PURPOSE: Operating Expenses July 2005 Shriners Hospital for Children $ 50.00 P.O. Box 83630-3772 Tampa, FL 83630-3772 PURPOSE: Memorial for James H. Epperson, III November 2005 Southeast 4-H Educational Center $40,000.00 15189 Airfield Road Wakefield, VA 23888 PURPOSE: Camperships Southeastern Council of Foundations $ 4,041.00 50 Hurt Plaza, Suite 1200 Atlanta, GA 30303 PURPOSE: Operating Expenses and Dues StarBase-Atlantis $30,000.00 Norfolk Naval Shipyard Norfolk, VA 23709 PURPOSE: Operating Expenses Suffolk Meals on Wheels $ 3,500.00 2800 Godwin Blvd. Suffolk, VA 23439 PURPOSE: Operating Expenses May 2005 Tidewater Academy $40,000.00 217 Church Street Wakefield, VA 23888 PURPOSE: Capital Campaign April 2005 Tidewater Community College $335,878.00 121 College Place Norfolk, VA 23510 PURPOSE: Beazley School of Nursing July 2005 Tidewater Pastoral Counseling Services $ 7,500.00 800 Colonial Avenue Norfolk, VA 23507 PURPOSE: Counseling Aid Fund August 2005 The Tidewater Winds $10,000.00 9625 Granby Street, Suite 205 Norfolk, VA 23503-1624 PURPOSE: Operating Expenses July 2005 Union Theological Seminary & Presbyterian School of Christian Education $ 5,000.00 3401 Brook Road Richmond, VA 23227 PURPOSE: Frederick W. Beazley Memorial Scholarship Fund September 2005 United Way of South Hampton Roads $30,000.00 P.O. Box 41069 Norfolk, VA 23451-1069 PURPOSE: 2005 Annual Campaign United Way of South Hampton Roads $ 6,000.00 P.O. Box 41069 Norfolk, VA 23451-1069 PURPOSE: Raising a Reader Project – Emily Spong Elementary School United Way of South Hampton Roads $50,000.00 P.O. Box 41069 Norfolk, VA 23541-1069 PURPOSE: “Raising a Reader” and “Portsmouth Reads” Programs July 2005 Virginia Aquarium and Marine Science Center $25,000.00 717 General Booth Blvd. Virginia Beach, VA 23451 PURPOSE: “Windows to the World” Capital and Endowment Campaign July 2005 Virginia Beach Foundation $ 5,000.00 P.O. Box 4629 Virginia Beach, VA 23454 PURPOSE: Seatack Neighborhood Assistance Program – Rock Climbing Wall Virginia College Fund $25,000.00 3122 W. Marshall Street Suite 214 Richmond, VA 23230 PURPOSE: Frederick Beazley Endowed Scholarships Virginia Foundation for Independent Colleges $180,000.00 8010 Ridge Road Richmond, VA 23229 PURPOSE: Beazley Scholarship 2002 Virginia Institute of Marine Science School of Marine Science $50,000.00 P.O. Box 1346 Gloucester Point, VA 23062 PURPOSE: Graduate Student Fellowship Endowment April 2005 Virginia Legal Aid Society $29,500.00 513 Church Street Lynchburg, VA 24505 PURPOSE: Suffolk Office Virginia Maritime Heritage Foundation $25,000.00 5000 World Trade Center Norfolk, VA 23510 PURPOSE: Education Program November 2005 Virginia Military Institute Foundation $ 5,000.00 Neikirk Hall P.O. Box 932 Lexington, VA 24450 PURPOSE: Beazley Foundation Scholarship Endowment September 2005 Virginia Military Institute $5,000.00 P.O. Box 932 Lexington, VA 24450 PURPOSE: College Orientation Workshop July 2005 Virginia Sports Hall of Fame and Museum $200,000.00 P.O. Box 370 Portsmouth, VA 23705 PURPOSE: Capital Campaign 1999 Virginia Wesleyan College $105,000.00 1584 Wesleyan Drive Norfolk/Virginia Beach, VA 23502-5599 PURPOSE: Capital Campaign for new science building, Beazley Scholarship Endowment April 2005 Virginia Wesleyan College $5,000.00 1584 Wesleyan Drive Norfolk/Virginia Beach, VA 23502 PURPOSE: Beazley Scholarship Endowment September 2005 Volunteer Hampton Roads $16,750.00 400 West Olney Road, Suite B Norfolk, VA 23507 PURPOSE: Nonprofit Training Program April 2005 YMCA of Portsmouth $125,000.00 4900 High Street West Portsmouth, VA 23703 PURPOSE: Expansion July 2005 YMCA of South Hampton Roads $50,000.00 5433 Shoulders Hill Road Suffolk, VA 23435 PURPOSE: North Suffolk YMCA – Fitness Equipment YWCA of South Hampton Roads $25,000.00 5215 Colley Avenue Norfolk, VA 23508 PURPOSE: Capital Campaign July 2005 Total $3,002,245.00.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Norfolk Naval Shipyard
    NORFOLK NAVAL SHIPYARD APPRENTICESHIP INFORMATION PACKAGE ANNOUNCEMENT PERIOD: February 1st – April 1st 2020 1 CONTENTS Contents 2 Introduction 3 Tidewater Community College Certificate Program Overview 4-6 Frequently Asked Questions How do I apply for Norfolk Naval Shipyard’s (NNSY) Apprenticeship Program? How do I complete an admissions application for TCC? I have previously applied or submitted an application to Tidewater Community College several years ago, but did not attend. Do I have to reapply? I have previously been enrolled in TCC, but it was several years ago. Do I have to reapply? How do I find information about taking the college placement test? Who needs to take the placement test? How do I know if my scores meet the requirements for eligibility? Do my scores impact my eligibility for any particular trade? I attended another college before coming to TCC. Will my credits transfer? If so, can I be exempt from courses I’ve already completed? How do I set up an account and complete an application on the Office of Personnel Management's website? What if I forgot my USAJOBS.gov username and/or password? What happens after the announcement’s closing date? Where else can I go to get more information? Employee Benefits Information – Web Sites 7-9 The Benefits of Working for the Department of the Navy Competitive Salaries Paid Annual Leave Annual Leave Accrual for Military Service Sick Leave Sick Leave to Care for a Family Member Military Leave Support of Work and Family Friendly Work Environment On-the-Job and Formal Education and
    [Show full text]
  • Norfolk's Nauticus: USS Wisconsin BB‐64
    Norfolk’s Nauticus: USS Wisconsin BB‐64 The history of the U.S. Navy’s use of battleships is quite interesting. Some say the first battleship was the USS Monitor, used against the CSS Virginia (Monitor) in Hampton Roads in 1862. Others say it was the USS Michigan, commissioned in 1844. It was the first iron‐ hulled warship for the defense of Lake Erie. In any case, battleships, or as some have nicknamed them “Rolling Thunder,” have made the United States the ruler of the high seas for over one century. A history of those famous ships can be found in the source using the term bbhistory. By the way, BB‐64 stands for the category battleship and the number assigned. This photo program deals with the USS Wisconsin, which is moored in Norfolk and part of the Hampton Road Naval Museum and Nauticus. Though the ship has been decommissioned, it can be recalled into duty, if necessary. On July 6, 1939, the US Congress authorized the construction of the USS Wisconsin. It was built at the Philadelphia Navy Yard. Its keel was laid in 1941, launched in 1943 and commissioned on April 15, 1944. The USS Wisconsin displaces 52,000 tons at full load, length 880 fee, beam 108 feet and draft at 36 feet. The artillery includes 16‐inch guns that fire shells weighing one‐ton apiece. Other weapons include antiaircraft guns and later added on missile launchers. The ship can reach a speed of 30 nautical miles (knots) per hour or 34 miles mph. The USS Wisconsin’s first battle star came at Leyte Operation, Luzon attacks in the Pacific in December 1944.
    [Show full text]
  • Actual-Lesson-Plan-1.Pdf
    The U.s.s. Alabama This 35,000-ton battleship, commissioned as the USS Alabama in August 1942, is one of only two surviving examples of the South Dakota class. Alabama gave distinguished service in the Atlantic and Pacific theaters of World War II. During its 40-month Asiatic- Pacific stint, it participated in the bombardment of Honshu and its 300-member crew earned nine battle stars. Decommissioned in 1947, the ship was transferred to the state of Alabama in 1964 and is now a war memorial, open to the public. National Register of Historic Places Listed 1986-01-14 www.nr.nps.gov/writeups/86000083.nl.pdf table of contents: Introduction……………………………………………….3 Getting Started……………………………………………4 Setting the Stage…………………………………………..5 Locating the Site…………………………………………..7 Determining the Facts…………………………………10 Visual Evidence……………………………………………..26 2 introduction The U.S.S. Alabama is sailing quietly on the Pacific Ocean on the night of 26 November 1943. Most of the sailors are sleeping soundly in their racks while the night shift is on watch. At 22:15 the Officer of the Deck receives word there are enemy planes approaching and gives order to sound General Quarters. General Quarters, General Quarters, all hands man your battle stations, forward starboard side aft port side General Quarters. Sailors jump out of their racks and others run to their battle stations in orderly chaos. As water-tight hatches are being closed, Captain Wilson runs to the bridge to take in the situation and starts giving orders. While signalmen search the skies with their signal lights for the approaching enemy aircraft, gunners and loaders ready their guns waiting for orders.
    [Show full text]
  • Airport Industrial Park
    VIEW ONLINE colliers.com/norfolk Airport Industrial Park AVAILABLE FOR LEASE | 5816 Ward Court, Virginia Beach | VA Located in the popular Airport Industrial Park. With easy access to I-64, Route 13, and the Chesapeake Bay Bridge Tunnel, the property also is convenient to the Norfolk Naval Base, Norfolk International Terminals, Norfolk International Airport, and numerous military bases. FEATURES BUILDING AREA: ±189,995 SF ELECTRIC: 3 phase 120/208/480/600 V with approximately 3700 AMP SITE AREA: ±9.18 AC FIRE SUPPRESSION: Wet sprinkler system New equipment 4 year old - 6' & 8' risers - 5 systems LOADING: • (14) 10’ x 10’ dock doors LIGHTING: Efficient Fluorescent Tube • (3) 8' X 10' dock doors and LED lights, some on • 17 dock doors motion sensors • ±21 truck positions RACKING: Abundant racking with ±2,568 • (1) grade level ramp pallet positions may convey CEILING HEIGHT: ±23’6” - ±21'37" HVAC: Natural Gas Heaters in the Warehouse Starting from: COLUMN SPACING: ±34' wide x 42’ deep VENTILATION: Through wall ventilation fans OFFICE AREA: 1st Floor: ±13,151 SF SF TRUCK COURT: ±129 FT (dock to curb) $5.25 2nd Floor: ±7,062 SF SF PSF,NNN ROOF: White membrane, new in TRAILER PARKING: ±30 Trailer spots at E. lot 2006 with ±21 year warranty remaining AUTO PARKING: ±75 Parking spaces striped RAIL: ±800 FT of rail spur with and room for more (8) 10' x 10' rail doors with NS service Colliers International H. Ashton Williamson, MAI, SIOR Chamie Burroughs 150 West Main St | Suite 1100 Senior Vice President First Vice President Norfolk, VA 23510 +1 757 228 1802 +1 757 217 1878 P: +1 757 490 3300 [email protected] [email protected] F: +1 757 490 1200 Accelerating success.
    [Show full text]
  • Navy Force Structure and Shipbuilding Plans: Background and Issues for Congress
    Navy Force Structure and Shipbuilding Plans: Background and Issues for Congress September 17, 2020 Congressional Research Service https://crsreports.congress.gov RL32665 Navy Force Structure and Shipbuilding Plans: Background and Issues for Congress Summary In December 2016, the Navy released a force-structure goal that calls for achieving and maintaining a fleet of 355 ships of certain types and numbers. The 355-ship goal was made U.S. policy by Section 1025 of the FY2018 National Defense Authorization Act (H.R. 2810/P.L. 115- 91 of December 12, 2017). The Trump Administration has identified the achievement of a Navy of 355 or more ships within 10 years as a high priority. The Navy states that it is working as well as it can, within a Navy budget top line that is essentially flat in real (i.e., inflation-adjusted terms), toward achieving that goal while also adequately funding other Navy priorities, such as restoring eroded ship readiness and improving fleet lethality. Navy officials state that while the 355-ship goal is a priority, they want to avoid creating a so-called hollow force, meaning a Navy that has an adequate number of ships but is unable to properly crew, arm, operate, and maintain those ships. The Navy states that its proposed FY2021 budget requests the procurement of eight new ships, but this figure includes LPD-31, an LPD-17 Flight II amphibious ship that Congress procured (i.e., authorized and appropriated procurement funding for) in FY2020. Excluding this ship, the Navy’s proposed FY2021 budget requests the procurement of seven new ships rather than eight.
    [Show full text]
  • The US Military on the Front Lines of Rising Seas: Naval Station Norfolk
    The US Military on the FACT SHEET Front Lines of Rising Seas Exposure to Coastal Flooding at Naval Station Norfolk, Virginia HIGHLIGHTS The US Armed Forces depend on safe and functional bases, such as NS Norfolk, With seas rising at an accelerating Virginia, to carry out their stated mission: to provide the military forces needed to rate, coastal military installations are deter war and to protect the security of the country. A roughly three-foot increase in sea level would threaten 128 coastal Department of Defense (DOD) installations increasingly exposed to storm surge and in the United States and the livelihoods of the people—both military personnel tidal flooding. The Union of Concerned and civilians—who depend on them (NAS 2011). In the area around Norfolk, seas Scientists (UCS) conducted analyses of are projected to rise between 4.5 and 6.9 feet by the end of this century. this changing exposure for 18 military To enable decision makers to better understand the sea level rise threat, and installations along the East and Gulf coasts. where and when it could become acute, UCS has performed a new analysis of 18 Analysis for Naval Station (NS) Norfolk, East and Gulf Coast military installations, including NS Norfolk. These sites were Virginia, found that in the second half of selected for their strategic importance to the armed forces, for their potential ex- posure to the effects of sea level rise, and because they represent coastal installa- this century, in the absence of preventive tions nationwide in terms of size, geographic distribution, and service branch.
    [Show full text]
  • NSIAD-90-161 Navy Maintenance: Status of the Public and Private
    United States General Accounting Office ‘C -” l Report to the Chairman, Committee on GAO . Armed Services, U.S. Senate September 1990 NAVY MAINTENANCE # Status of the Public and Private Shipyard Competition Program GAO/NSLAD-90-161 . United States _ General Accounhng Office washington, Dc-axa. National Security and International Affairs Division B-240400 September 26,199O The Honorable Sam Nunn Chairman, Committee on Armed Services United States Senate Dear Mr. Chairman: Since fiscal year 1985, defense appropriations acts have included provi- sions for competition between public and private shipyards for a portion of the Navy’s depot level ship maintenance and modernization work. In a March 1988 report,1 we concluded, in part, that inherent differences preclude public and private shipyards from competing on an equal footing. We noted, however, that the Navy had taken steps to ensure that public and private shipyards be treated as equitably as possible. At that time, only a few overhauls and repairs had been completed. In response to a request from your office, we reviewed the current status of the shipyard competition program. This report summarizes the results of that work. The public and private shipyard competition program has resulted in Results in Brief limited competition between public and private shipyards with both types of shipyards submitting proposals on less than half the vessels competed. In part, this is because private shipyards can price proposals below expected costs, whereas public shipyards are required to include a proportionate share of all expected costs. Additionally, the limited availability of commercial ship construction and repair work has cre- ated a highly competitive market among private shipyards resulting in relatively low price proposals.
    [Show full text]
  • NASA/Navy Benchmarking Exchange (NNBE)
    National Aeronautics and Space Administration NASA/Navy Benchmarking Exchange (NNBE) Volume I Interim Report | December 20, 2002 Navy Submarine Program Safety Assurance NNBE Benchmarking Team NASA Office of Safety & Mission Assurance and NAVSEA 92Q Submarine Safety & Quality Assurance Division Acknowledgement The NASA Benchmarking Team gratefully acknowledges the cooperation and outstanding support of Team Submarine1 during this phase of the NASA/Navy Benchmarking Exchange. Team Submarine coordinated and hosted numerous meetings and site visits enabling the NASA team to acquire a large volume of relevant information in a relatively short period of time. Members of the core Navy team supported all events and provided continuity and assistance in understanding the subtleties of Navy processes and practices. In addition, Team Submarine reviewed this Interim Report for accuracy and in many cases offered clarifying text. The NASA team anticipates that this exchange will form the basis for further development of ongoing relationships between our communities. 1 NAVSEA Headquarters; Supervisor of Shipbuilding (SUPSHIP) – Groton; Electric Boat; Portsmouth Naval Shipyard; Submarine Maintenance, Engineering, Planning, and Procurement (SUBMEPP); Ship Availability Planning and Engineering Center (SHAPEC); NAVSEA Logistics Center (NAVSEALOGCEN). ii NNBE INTERIM REPORT Signature Page The undersigned participated in developing the content and verifying the accuracy of the process attributes presented in section 3 of this Interim Report and the comparisons provided in section 4.1. The undersigned also attest to their organization’s commitment to pursue the additional benchmarking exchange activities discussed in section 2 of this report. NASA Team Lead Navy Team Lead The opportunities discussed in section 4.2 of this document represent the consensus of the NASA core benchmarking team membership.
    [Show full text]
  • Naval Accidents 1945-1988, Neptune Papers No. 3
    -- Neptune Papers -- Neptune Paper No. 3: Naval Accidents 1945 - 1988 by William M. Arkin and Joshua Handler Greenpeace/Institute for Policy Studies Washington, D.C. June 1989 Neptune Paper No. 3: Naval Accidents 1945-1988 Table of Contents Introduction ................................................................................................................................... 1 Overview ........................................................................................................................................ 2 Nuclear Weapons Accidents......................................................................................................... 3 Nuclear Reactor Accidents ........................................................................................................... 7 Submarine Accidents .................................................................................................................... 9 Dangers of Routine Naval Operations....................................................................................... 12 Chronology of Naval Accidents: 1945 - 1988........................................................................... 16 Appendix A: Sources and Acknowledgements........................................................................ 73 Appendix B: U.S. Ship Type Abbreviations ............................................................................ 76 Table 1: Number of Ships by Type Involved in Accidents, 1945 - 1988................................ 78 Table 2: Naval Accidents by Type
    [Show full text]
  • 93 Stat. 928 Public Law 96-125—Nov
    93 STAT. 928 PUBLIC LAW 96-125—NOV. 26, 1979 Public Law 96-125 96th Congress An Act Nov. 26,1979 rS 13191 "^^ authorize certain construction at military installations for fiscal year 1980, and '• • for other purposes. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the Military United States of America in Congress assembled. That this Act may be Construction gited as the "MiUtary Construction Authorization Act, 1980". AuthorizatioAct, 1980. n *' TITLE I—ARMY AUTHORIZED ARMY CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS SEC. 101. The Secretary of the Army may establish or develop military installations and facilities by acquiring, constructing, con­ verting, rehabilitating, or installing permanent or temporary public works, including land acquisition, site preparation, appurtenances, utilities, and equipment, for the following acquisition and construc­ tion: INSIDE THE UNITED STATES UNITED STATES ARMY FORCES COMMAND Fort Bragg, North Carolina, $1,250,000. Fort Campbell, Kentucky, $18,200,000. Fort Drum, New York, $690,000. Fort Greely, Alaska, $820,000. Fort Hood, Texas, $13,650,000. Fort Hunter Liggett, California, $2,900,000. Fort Lewis, Washington, $7,400,000. Fort Meade, Maryland, $18,500,000. Fort Ord, California, $17,380,000. Fort Polk, Louisiana, $26,810,000. Fort Richardson, Alaska, $5,250,000. Fort Riley, Kansas, $28,350,000. Fort Sheridan, Illinois, $1,200,000. Schofield Barracks, Hawaii, $2,750,000. Fort Stewart/Hunter Army Air Field, Georgia, $39,900,000. Yakima Firing Center, Washington, $1,100,000. UNITED STATES ARMY TRAINING AND DOCTRINE COMMAND Camp Perry, Ohio, $1,000,000. Fort Belvoir, Virginia, $2,420,000. Fort Benning, Georgia, $12,800,000.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Monitoring and Disposal of Radioactive Wastes from U.S
    REPORT NT-19-1 MAY 2019 ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AND DISPOSAL OF RADIOACTIVE WASTES FROM U.S. NAVAL NUCLEAR-POWERED SHIPS AND THEIR SUPPORT FACILITIES NAVAL NUCLEAR PROPULSION PROGRAM DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY WASHINGTON, D.C. 20350 This publication was printed on Recycled Paper Report NT-19-1 May 2019 ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AND DISPOSAL OF RADIOACTIVE WASTES FROM U.S. NAVAL NUCLEAR-POWERED SHIPS AND THEIR SUPPORT FACILITIES 2018 Prepared by T. J. Mueller, J. M. Steele, and A. C. Gellender Naval Nuclear Propulsion Program Department of the Navy Approved by __________________________ J. F. CALDWELL, JR. Admiral, U.S. Navy Director, Naval Nuclear Propulsion ABSTRACT This report assesses the environmental effect of disposal of radioactive wastes originating from U.S. naval nuclear propulsion plants and their support facilities. The total long-lived gamma radioactivity in liquids discharged to all ports and harbors from all naval nuclear-powered ships and supporting tenders, naval bases, and shipyards was less than 0.002 curie in 2018. To put this small quantity of radioactivity into perspective, it is less than the quantity of naturally occurring radioactivity in the volume of saline harbor water occupied by a single nuclear-powered submarine, or the quantity of naturally occurring radioactivity in the top inch of soil on a half-acre lot. This report confirms that procedures used by the Navy to control releases of radioactivity from U.S. naval nuclear-powered ships and their support facilities have not had an adverse effect on human health or the quality of the environment. These procedures have ensured that no member of the general public has received measurable radiation exposure as a result of operations of the Naval Nuclear Propulsion Program.
    [Show full text]
  • Norfolk Naval Shipyard (NNSY)
    SIOP Nationwide PA, Enclosure 2 Norfolk Naval Shipyard Portsmouth, Virginia Cultural Resources Fact Sheet Figure 1. Present-Day View of the Norfolk Naval Shipyard Location History Located in Portsmouth, Virginia, Norfolk Naval Shipyard Norfolk Naval Shipyard has continuously operated for (NNSY) stands on the west bank of the Elizabeth River’s over 250 years under four flags—Britain, the State of Vir- Southern Branch. NNSY’s 1,275-acre operational base ginia, the Confederate Navy, and the United States Navy. includes the 465-acre main site and four nearby noncon- In 1798, the newly created Department of the Navy chose tiguous annexes, also sited alongside the Elizabeth Riv- the circa-1767 Gosport Shipyard as a prime location for er, in Portsmouth and Chesapeake. The main site’s wa- shipbuilding, purchasing it from Virginia in June 1801. terfront Industrial Area Precinct includes ship berthing, Opening the nation’s first operating dry dock in 1833 fur- maintenance, and repair facilities, with five operable dry ther solidified the importance of this base for the Chesa- docks and four major piers. Approximately 5,000-6,000 peake. military personnel and 11,000 civilians work at NNSY. Between 1,500 and 3,000 contractors work at the ship- Gosport’s geographic position and status made it a desir- yard daily, providing support and services. able entity during the Civil War. After seizing Gosport from the Union in April 1861, the Confederate Navy sal- Mission vaged the scuttled U.S.S. Merrimack. With the addition of steam engines and metal superstructure over its hull, the NNSY’s mission is to improve the US Navy’s fleet abili- Merrimack, rechristened the C.S.S.
    [Show full text]