DOCSLIB.ORG

Lancashire, Manchester and Merseyside Butterfly and Moth Recording Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

BUTTERFLY CONSERVATION LANCASHIRE BRANCH DEDICATED TO SAVING WILD BUTTERFLIES, MOTHS AND THEIR HABITATS Lancashire, Manchester and Merseyside Butterfly and Moth Recording Report 2014 Butterfly Conservation President Sir David Attenborough Registerd Office Manor Yard, East Lulworth, Wareham, Dorset BH20 5QP Head Office Manor Yard, East Lulworth, Wareham, Dorset BH205QP Registered in England 2206468 Tel 0870 7744309 Fax 0870 7706150 Registered Charity No 254397 Email: [email protected] Sivell Butterfly Conservation Registered in England 2206468 Pete Marsh Registered Charity 254937 President Sir David Attenborough John Girdley Head Office Manor Yard, East Lulworth, Wareham, Dorset BH20 5QP 01929 400209 Butterfly Recording Laura Sivell County Butterfly Recorder Please continue to send your butterfly records (remember, every little helps)to: Lancashire and Merseyside Laura Sivell, email [email protected]. Or by post to 22 Beaumont Place, Lancaster LA1 2EY. Phone 01524 69248. Please note that for records to be included in the annual report, the deadline is the end of February. Late records will still be used for the database, but once the report is written, I’m not going to update or rewrite on the basis of late records. The report is also going to have to be written earlier in the year, in February, as I’m full on with work in March/April and I just can’t do it! East Lancs John Plackett ([email protected]) from Nelson Nats has taken over the East Lancashire Butterfly Report, so please all send your records to him as well as the Lancashire recorder. Greater Manchester These records should only go to Peter Hardy, 81 Winstanley Road, Sale, M33 2AT, email [email protected] - not to Laura Sivell. Some people have been sending their records to both, leading to a fair amount of wasted time in sorting out the duplicate records. Likewise Lancashire and Merseyside records should only go to Laura. Recorders list I always miss someone off, and that, combined with many new contributors sending in records via the Big Butterfly Count and the new iRecord App, has led to the decision not to include a list in this report, or future ones. Hours of work, and there’s always mistakes; it’s just not worth it. Huge thanks to all of you though. Record Validation Because of the larger number of records received via the various schemes such as Big Butterfly Count, the process of checking and validating them has become much more onerous. It’s easy enough to just delete the Chequered Skippers seen in August, Marbled Whites and the like, but checking through the dates of hundreds of sightings to check that they fall within reasonable parameters takes quite a bit of time, and some, mainly Wall Brown and Common Blue records, are still in a ‘holding’ file so don’t appear in the text or on the maps. Maps in this butterfly report are for 2014 only, but there isn’t space for every species. Other updated maps will soon be available on the Lancashire Branch website . 2 High Counts table You may notice that the 2007 figures are missing. I can’t find the reports for those years. If anyone has kept their copy and could supply the figures, I’d be very grateful. Highest counts 2000 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Small Skipper 244 190 155 100 41 60 54 200 97 150 500 218 Large Skipper 19 39 30 20 40 50 28 33 70 57 25 190 85 Dingy Skipper 17 10 15 11 6 10 34 29 29 22 34 35 Clouded Yellow 6 1 1 1 4 12 1 3 3 1 1 6 Brimstone 17 20 41 12 19 29 30 16 36 16 5 21 22 Large White 100 80 30 50 130 303 100 85 200 18 50 300 100 Small White 64 35 50 23 50 30 120 32 150 52 130 100 Green-veined White 100 46 200 50 70 45 254 155 100 119 100 229 113 Orange Tip 30 28 12 23 20 20 12 14 20 20 55 22 100+ Green Hairstreak 105 213 651 48 70 130 100+ 38 92 463 55 12 68 Purple Hairstreak 10 20 8 24 25 50 57 67 49 42 11 16 59 White-letter Hairstreak 6 2 3 1 10 9 3 4 10 3 3 16 10 Small Copper 6 15 41 22 23 23 24 42 18 150 45 84 Northern Brown Argus 65 37 46 8 22 32 17 49 47 103 24 34 26 Common Blue 190 256 97 150 216 88 281 182 250 293 200 268 Holly Blue 8 8 19 6 8 8 30 14 5 4 7 14 Duke of Burgundy 10 8 4 7 5 6 12 15 4 12 7 Red Admiral 61 37 153 37 75 86 46 81 25 50 15 28 100 Painted Lady 44 28 120 28 3 83 1 1000+ 7 20 5 6 20 Small Tortoiseshell 204 105 141 105 66 1700 24 39 287 120 60 280 100 Peacock 148 146 56 71 58 144 49 76 104 71 72 500 50 Comma 19 12 30 13 7 40 6 15 10 14 8 11 15 Small Pearl-bordered 104 35 38 10 10 11 15 24 29 34 33 49 50 Pearl-bordered Fritillary 40 40 40 34 28 22 12 25 38 22 13 20 High Brown Fritillary 25 67 38 35 80 10 119 67 52 16 17 6 Dark Green Fritillary 2 4 6 20 134 14 50 88 70 54 293 10 46 Speckled Wood 62 155 201 67 233 104 47 108 65 66 90 50 115 Wall 20 25 60 34 25 16 20 11 5 7 17 47 Scotch Argus 20 161 304 188 134 199 158 221 38 Grayling 74 78 100 14 37 81 84 108 105 206 98 200 28 Gatekeeper 400 250 136 100 400 79 100 205 137 900 300 225 Meadow Brown 394 300 225 181 194 500 295 433 143 425 300 600 474 Ringlet 0 0 1 1 1 12 100 50 250 100 248 348 Small Heath 78 15 54 50 37 37 59 70 150 75 67 120 Large Heath 69 90 63 28 143 5 48 53 20 33 21 18 3 Number of recorded 2km squares per species and percentage of total number of 2km squares where any butterfly recorded 1994 1995 % 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 % 2001 2002 2003 2004 Small Skipper 71 153 20.48 132 89 95 133 103 19.96 95 114 139 99 Large Skipper 166 267 35.74 147 103 87 127 98 18.99 70 100 116 92 Dingy Skipper 4 5 5 4 4 3 8 8 6 5 7 Clouded Yellow 16 0 14 1 35 2 96 1 4 7 2 Brimstone 18 24 3.21 32 41 48 44 58 11.24 38 61 59 58 Large White 261 392 52.47 286 235 295 340 235 45.54 224 260 318 228 Small White 241 448 59.97 292 254 246 322 203 39.34 177 207 301 172 Green-veined White 181 320 42.83 255 219 243 311 204 39.53 179 201 303 245 Orange Tip 189 265 35.47 231 182 205 246 154 29.84 133 194 185 199 Green Hairstreak 14 29 3.88 23 19 30 22 24 4.65 7 38 25 27 Purple Hairstreak 7 7 2 13 9 9 13 13 11 16 12 White-letter Hairstreak 1 2 2 3 0 5 5 2 3 9 6 Small Copper 169 219 29.31 216 164 108 121 83 16.08 57 68 147 132 Northern Brown Argus 7 7 5 4 7 4 3 6 6 7 8 Common Blue 126 160 21.49 149 100 83 119 100 19.37 71 102 121 120 Holly Blue 36 30 4.01 41 52 142 158 86 16.66 65 99 91 122 Duke of Burgundy 2 3 2 3 2 2 3 2 1 2 3 Red Admiral 263 395 272 156 174 279 222 202 188 332 163 Painted Lady 134 174 415 44 60 72 176 58 157 315 169 Small Tortoiseshell 248 497 66.53 396 403 331 345 238 46.12 248 347 470 281 Peacock 158 266 35.6 290 279 305 311 226 43.79 235 316 329 266 Comma 66 165 22.08 138 122 104 182 168 32.55 145 164 221 146 Small Pearl-bordered 8 8 4 5 10 3 3 3 4 5 6 Pearl-bordered Fritillary 6 7 4 5 6 4 4 4 5 4 6 High Brown Fritillary 10 7 6 6 9 4 4 6 7 7 8 Dark Green Fritillary 5 7 6 5 5 4 6 4 6 8 17 Speckled Wood 65 102 13.65 64 74 117 190 193 37.4 179 241 316 248 Wall 196 205 27.44 191 147 182 209 143 27.71 99 103 104 117 Scotch Argus 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 3 1 1 2 Grayling 24 18 2.4 12 18 17 15 13 2.51 19 12 12 17 Gatekeeper 98 105 14.05 115 75 66 133 116 22.48 101 125 135 134 Meadow Brown 301 410 54.88 294 225 222 322 246 47.67 213 233 310 236 Ringlet 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 2 2 Small Heath 62 90 12.04 79 66 45 54 43 8.33 36 59 69 60 Large Heath 1 3 0 7 1 7 1 0 1 4 5 Total recorded squares 566 747 604 555 570 683 516 432 563 675 537 All Sections 115 Small Skipper 110 None 105 100 Arnside Knott 95 90 Small Skipper 85 80 75 70 First 8.6.14 G Lilley, Eccleston 65 60 55 50 Last 26.9.14 C Wilkinson, Rochdale garden 45 Total Number Counted Number Total 40 35 Highest 218 C Ellison, Gin Clough on 24.7.14 30 25 20 15 The high count was less than half of last year’s though most 10 5 0 transects showed a nice increase.
Recommended publications
  • (Hymenoptera, Tenthredinidae) – a New Pest Species of Ash Tree in the Republic of Moldova

    (Hymenoptera, Tenthredinidae) – a New Pest Species of Ash Tree in the Republic of Moldova

    Muzeul Olteniei Craiova. Oltenia. Studii şi comunicări. Ştiinţele Naturii. Tom. 36, No. 1/2020 ISSN 1454-6914 Tomostethus nigritus F. (HYMENOPTERA, TENTHREDINIDAE) – A NEW PEST SPECIES OF ASH TREE IN THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA MOCREAC Nadejda Abstract. In the Republic of Moldova, the ash tree is a common forest species, used in the reforestation and afforestation of woods and territories, and widely used as an ornamental tree in cities and along roads. For more than ten years, our ash tree woods have been severely defoliated by the ash weevil Stereonychusfraxini (De Geer, 1775) from Curculionidae family. In the vegetation period of 2018 and 2019, defoliation was seen on ash trees, caused by unknown sawfly larvae species from the Tenthredinidae family. The analyses showed that these pests belong to the Hymenoptera order – the privet sawfly – Macrophya punctumalbum (Linnaeus, 1767), and Tomostethus nigritus (Fabricius, 1804), the last one being a new species for the fauna of the Republic of Moldova. The biggest ash defoliations caused by the Tomostethus nigritus larvae were recorded in the centre of the country, especially in the Nisporeni and Tighina Forest Enterprises and in the “Plaiul Fagului” Scientific Reserve, as well as in the urban space. Keywords: Ash Black sawfly, Tenthredinidae, ash tree, outbreaks, defoliations, Republic of Moldova. Rezumat. Tomostethus nigritus F. (Hymenoptera, Tenthredinidae) – specie nouă de dăunător al frasinului în Republica Moldova. În Republica Moldova, frasinul este o specie obișnuită, folosită nu numai în reîmpădurire și împădurire dar utilizat pe scară largă ca arbore ornamental în parcurile din orașe și de-a lungul drumurilor. Mai bine de zece ani, pădurile de frasin sunt defoliate anual de către trombarul frunzelor de frasin Stereonychus fraxini (De Geer, 1775) din familia Curculionidae.
  • (Crone Et Al.) S1. List of Studies with Movement In

    (Crone Et Al.) S1. List of Studies with Movement In

    Supplementary material: Mixed use landscapes can promote range expansion (Crone et al.) S1. List of studies with movement in high- and low-quality environments 1 Allema, B., van der Werf, W., van Lenteren, J. C., Hemerik, L. & Rossing, W. A. H. Movement behaviour of the carabid beetle Pterostichus melanarius in crops and at a habitat interface explains patterns of population redistribution in the field. PLoS One 9 (2014). 2 Avgar, T., Mosser, A., Brown, G. S. & Fryxell, J. M. Environmental and individual drivers of animal movement patterns across a wide geographical gradient. J. Anim. Ecol. 82, 96-106 (2013). 3 Brouwers, N. C. & Newton, A. C. Movement analyses of wood cricket (Nemobius sylvestris) (Orthoptera: Gryllidae). Bulletin of Entomological Research 100, 623-634 (2010). 4 Brown, L. M. et al. Using animal movement behavior to categorize land cover and predict consequences for connectivity and patch residence times. Landscape Ecol 32, 1657-1670 (2017). 5 Capinera, J. L. & Barbosa, P. Dispersal of first-instar gypsy moth larvae in relation to population quality. Oecologia 26, 53-64 (1976). 6 Cartar, R. V. & Real, L. A. Habitat structure and animal movement: the behaviour of bumble bees in uniform and random spatial resource distributions. Oecologia 112, 430- 434 (1997). 7 Chapman, D. S., Dytham, C. & Oxford, G. S. Landscape and fine-scale movements of a leaf beetle: the importance of boundary behaviour. Oecologia 154, 55-64 (2007). 8 Claussen, D. L., Finkler, M. S. & Smith, M. M. Thread trailing of turtles: methods for evaluating spatial movements and pathway structure. Canadian Journal of Zoology 75, 2120-2128 (1997).
  • Scope: Munis Entomology & Zoology Publishes a Wide Variety of Papers

    Scope: Munis Entomology & Zoology Publishes a Wide Variety of Papers

    732 _____________Mun. Ent. Zool. Vol. 7, No. 2, June 2012__________ STRUCTURE OF LEPIDOPTEROCENOSES ON OAKS QUERCUS DALECHAMPII AND Q. CERRIS IN CENTRAL EUROPE AND ESTIMATION OF THE MOST IMPORTANT SPECIES Miroslav Kulfan* * Department of Ecology, Faculty of Natural Sciences, Comenius University, Mlynská dolina B-1, SK-84215 Bratislava, SLOVAKIA. E-mail: [email protected] [Kulfan, M. 2012. Structure of lepidopterocenoses on oaks Quercus dalechampii and Q. cerris in Central Europe and estimation of the most important species. Munis Entomology & Zoology, 7 (2): 732-741] ABSTRACT: On the basis of lepidopterous larvae a total of 96 species on Quercus dalechampii and 58 species on Q. cerris were recorded in 10 study plots of Malé Karpaty and Trnavská pahorkatina hills. The families Geometridae, Noctuidae and Tortricidae encompassed the highest number of found species. The most recorded species belonged to the trophic group of generalists. On the basis of total abundance of lepidopterous larvae found on Q. dalechampii from all the study plots the most abundant species was evidently Operophtera brumata. The most abundant species on Q. cerris was Cyclophora ruficiliaria. Based on estimated oak leaf area consumed by a larva it is shown that Lymantria dispar was the most important leaf-chewing species of both Q. dalechampii and Q. cerris. KEY WORDS: Slovakia, Quercus dalechampii, Q. cerris, the most important species. About 300 Lepidoptera species are known to damage the assimilation tissue of oaks in Central Europe (Patočka, 1954, 1980; Patočka et al.1999; Reiprich, 2001). Lepidoptera larvae are shown to be the most important group of oak defoliators (Patočka et al., 1962, 1999).
  • Thesis.Pdf (3.979Mb)

    Thesis.Pdf (3.979Mb)

    FACULTY OF BIOSCIENCES, FISHERIES AND ECONOMICS DEPARTMENT OF ARCTIC AND MARINE BIOLOGY Cyclically outbreaking geometrid moths in sub-arctic mountain birch forest: the organization and impacts of their interactions with animal communities — Ole Petter Laksforsmo Vindstad A dissertation for the degree of Philosophiae Doctor – October 2014 Cyclically outbreaking geometrid moths in sub-arctic mountain birch forest: the organization and impacts of their interactions with animal communities Ole Petter Laksforsmo Vindstad A dissertation for the degree of Philosophiae Doctor University of Tromsø – The arctic university of Norway Faculty of Biosciences, Fisheries and Economics Department of Arctic and Marine Biology Autumn 2014 1 Dedicated to everyone who has helped me along the way 2 Supervisors Professor Rolf Anker Ims1 Senior researcher Jane Uhd Jepsen2 1 Department of Arctic and Marine Biology, University of Tromsø, Tromsø, Norway 2 Norwegian Institute for Nature Research, Fram Centre, Tromsø, Norway Cover photos Front cover – Larvae of Epirrita autumnata feeding on mountain birch during a moth outbreak in northern Norway. Photo: Moritz Klinghardt Study I – Portrait of Agrypon flaveolatum. One of the most important larval parasitoid species in study I. Photo: Ole Petter Laksforsmo Vindstad Study II – Carcass of an Operophtera brumata larva, standing over the cocoon of its killer, the parasitoid group Protapanteles anchisiades/P. immunis/Cotesia salebrosa. Photo: Ole Petter Laksforsmo Vindstad Study III – Larva of the parasitoid group Phobocampe sp./Sinophorus crassifemur emerging from Agriopis aurantiaria host larva. Photo: Tino Schott Study IV – An area of healthy mountain birch forest, representative for the undamaged sampling sites in study IV and V. Photo: Jakob Iglhaut Study V – An area of mountain birch forest that has been heavily damaged by a moth outbreak, representative for the damaged sampling sites in study IV and V.
  • Contributions to Knowledge of the Geometrid Fauna of Bulgaria and Greece, with Four Species New for the Greek Fauna (Lepidoptera: Geometridae) (Plate 12)

    Contributions to Knowledge of the Geometrid Fauna of Bulgaria and Greece, with Four Species New for the Greek Fauna (Lepidoptera: Geometridae) (Plate 12)

    Esperiana Band 18: 221- 224 Bad Staffelstein; Schwanfeld, 02. Dezember 2013 ISBN 978-3-938249-04-8 Contributions to knowledge of the geometrid fauna of Bulgaria and Greece, with four species new for the Greek fauna (Lepidoptera: Geometridae) (plate 12) Balázs TÓTH, János BABICS & Balázs BENEDEK Abstract During a tour led by the authors to Bulgaria and Greece in March, 2013, a total of 19 geometrid species were observed at five localities. Biston achyra WEHRLI, 1936, Agriopis marginaria (FABRICIUS, 1776), A. leucophaearia ([DENIS & SCHIffERMÜLLER], 1775) and Erannis ankeraria (STAUDINGER, 1861) were found for the first time in Greece. An entirely new habitat type is included to the biotope range of E. ankeraria, arousing the possibility of this species being widespread in the Mediterranean countries. The authors hope that these observations will encourage attention to the exploration of the populations, thereby contributing to the more efficient protection of this species. Checklists are given to each collecting events. Key words: Biston, Agriopis, Erannis, Bulgaria, Greece, new data, oak woodland, macchia-scrub, soil types Introduction Biston achyra WEHRLI, 1936 was described from Asia Minor and subsequently found in Ukraine (KOSTJUK, 1990), the Levant (KOSTJUK, 1991) and Russia (SINEV, 2008). This species can be distinguished from its relative B. strataria (HUFNAGEL, 1767) by its considerably smaller size, more elongated forewing, and the presence of discal spot on the hindwing. Agriopis marginaria (FABRICIUS, 1776) and A. leucophaearia ([DENIS & SCHIFFERMÜLLER], 1775) are both frequent and widespread in Europe. The former species is distributed from the Iberian Peninsula to the Urals and the Caucasus Mts., and is also present in Asia Minor.
  • St Julians Park Species List, 1984 – 2003

    St Julians Park Species List, 1984 – 2003

    St Julians Park Species List, 1984 – 2003 Fungi Species Common Name Date recorded Scleroderma citrinum Common Earth Ball 19/09/99 Amillaria mellea Honey Fungus 19/09/99 Hypholoma sublateridium Brick Caps 19/09/99 Piptoporus belulinus Birch Polypore 19/09/99 Lycoperdon perlatum Common Puffball 19/09/99 Coriolus versicolor Many-Zoned Polypore 19/09/99 Boletus erythropus - 19/09/99 Lactarius quietus Oak/Oily Milk Cap 19/09/99 Russula cyanoxantha The Charcoal Burner 19/09/99 Amanita muscaria Fly Agaric 19/09/99 Laccaria laccata Deceiver 19/09/99 Lepidoptera Species Common Name Date recorded Melanargia galathea Marbled White 1992/3 Venessa cardui Painted Lady 1992/3 Thymelicus sylvestris Small Skipper 1992/3, 06/06/98 Ochlodes venata Large Skipper 1992/3, 06/06/98 Pararge aegeria Speckled Wood 1992/3, 06/06/98 Venessa atalanta Red Admiral 1992/3 Aglais urticae Small Tortoiseshell 1992/3 Polyommatus icarus Common Blue 1992/3, 06/06/98 Pyronia tithonus Gamekeeper 1992/3 Maniola jurtina Meadow Brown 1992/3, 06/06/98 Aphantopus hyperantus Ringlet 1992/3, 06/06/98 Inachis 10 Peacock 1992/3, 23/03/00 Polygonia C-album Comma 1992/3, 23/03/00 Anthocaris cardamines Orange Tip 1992/3 Noctua pronuba Large Yellow Underwing 06/06/98 Pieris brassicae Large White 06/06/98 Zygaena trifolii 5 Spot Burnet 06/06/98 Diboba caeruleocephala Figure of Eight 22/10/99 Xanthia aurago Barred Sallow 22/10/99 Chloroclysta truncate Common Marbled Carpet 22/10/99 Epirrata dilutata November Moth 22/10/99 Epirrata chrysti Pale November Moth 22/10/99, 07/11/99 Chloroclysta
  • Lepidoptera in Cheshire in 2002

    Lepidoptera in Cheshire in 2002

    Lepidoptera in Cheshire in 2002 A Report on the Micro-Moths, Butterflies and Macro-Moths of VC58 S.H. Hind, S. McWilliam, B.T. Shaw, S. Farrell and A. Wander Lancashire & Cheshire Entomological Society November 2003 1 1. Introduction Welcome to the 2002 report on lepidoptera in VC58 (Cheshire). This is the second report to appear in 2003 and follows on from the release of the 2001 version earlier this year. Hopefully we are now on course to return to an annual report, with the 2003 report planned for the middle of next year. Plans for the ‘Atlas of Lepidoptera in VC58’ continue apace. We had hoped to produce a further update to the Atlas but this report is already quite a large document. We will, therefore produce a supplementary report on the Pug Moths recorded in VC58 sometime in early 2004, hopefully in time to be sent out with the next newsletter. As usual, we have produced a combined report covering micro-moths, macro- moths and butterflies, rather than separate reports on all three groups. Doubtless observers will turn first to the group they are most interested in, but please take the time to read the other sections. Hopefully you will find something of interest. Many thanks to all recorders who have already submitted records for 2002. Without your efforts this report would not be possible. Please keep the records coming! This request also most definitely applies to recorders who have not sent in records for 2002 or even earlier. It is never too late to send in historic records as they will all be included within the above-mentioned Atlas when this is produced.
  • Acoustic Communication in the Nocturnal Lepidoptera

    Acoustic Communication in the Nocturnal Lepidoptera

    Chapter 6 Acoustic Communication in the Nocturnal Lepidoptera Michael D. Greenfield Abstract Pair formation in moths typically involves pheromones, but some pyra- loid and noctuoid species use sound in mating communication. The signals are generally ultrasound, broadcast by males, and function in courtship. Long-range advertisement songs also occur which exhibit high convergence with commu- nication in other acoustic species such as orthopterans and anurans. Tympanal hearing with sensitivity to ultrasound in the context of bat avoidance behavior is widespread in the Lepidoptera, and phylogenetic inference indicates that such perception preceded the evolution of song. This sequence suggests that male song originated via the sensory bias mechanism, but the trajectory by which ances- tral defensive behavior in females—negative responses to bat echolocation sig- nals—may have evolved toward positive responses to male song remains unclear. Analyses of various species offer some insight to this improbable transition, and to the general process by which signals may evolve via the sensory bias mechanism. 6.1 Introduction The acoustic world of Lepidoptera remained for humans largely unknown, and this for good reason: It takes place mostly in the middle- to high-ultrasound fre- quency range, well beyond our sensitivity range. Thus, the discovery and detailed study of acoustically communicating moths came about only with the use of electronic instruments sensitive to these sound frequencies. Such equipment was invented following the 1930s, and instruments that could be readily applied in the field were only available since the 1980s. But the application of such equipment M. D. Greenfield (*) Institut de recherche sur la biologie de l’insecte (IRBI), CNRS UMR 7261, Parc de Grandmont, Université François Rabelais de Tours, 37200 Tours, France e-mail: [email protected] B.
  • Somerset's Ecological Network

    Somerset's Ecological Network

    Somerset’s Ecological Network Mapping the components of the ecological network in Somerset 2015 Report This report was produced by Michele Bowe, Eleanor Higginson, Jake Chant and Michelle Osbourn of Somerset Wildlife Trust, and Larry Burrows of Somerset County Council, with the support of Dr Kevin Watts of Forest Research. The BEETLE least-cost network model used to produce Somerset’s Ecological Network was developed by Forest Research (Watts et al, 2010). GIS data and mapping was produced with the support of Somerset Environmental Records Centre and First Ecology Somerset Wildlife Trust 34 Wellington Road Taunton TA1 5AW 01823 652 400 Email: [email protected] somersetwildlife.org Front Cover: Broadleaved woodland ecological network in East Mendip Contents 1. Introduction .................................................................................................................... 1 2. Policy and Legislative Background to Ecological Networks ............................................ 3 Introduction ............................................................................................................... 3 Government White Paper on the Natural Environment .............................................. 3 National Planning Policy Framework ......................................................................... 3 The Habitats and Birds Directives ............................................................................. 4 The Conservation of Habitats and Species Regulations 2010 ..................................
  • Schutz Des Naturhaushaltes Vor Den Auswirkungen Der Anwendung Von Pflanzenschutzmitteln Aus Der Luft in Wäldern Und Im Weinbau

    Schutz Des Naturhaushaltes Vor Den Auswirkungen Der Anwendung Von Pflanzenschutzmitteln Aus Der Luft in Wäldern Und Im Weinbau

    TEXTE 21/2017 Umweltforschungsplan des Bundesministeriums für Umwelt, Naturschutz, Bau und Reaktorsicherheit Forschungskennzahl 3714 67 406 0 UBA-FB 002461 Schutz des Naturhaushaltes vor den Auswirkungen der Anwendung von Pflanzenschutzmitteln aus der Luft in Wäldern und im Weinbau von Dr. Ingo Brunk, Thomas Sobczyk, Dr. Jörg Lorenz Technische Universität Dresden, Fakultät für Umweltwissenschaften, Institut für Forstbotanik und Forstzoologie, Tharandt Im Auftrag des Umweltbundesamtes Impressum Herausgeber: Umweltbundesamt Wörlitzer Platz 1 06844 Dessau-Roßlau Tel: +49 340-2103-0 Fax: +49 340-2103-2285 [email protected] Internet: www.umweltbundesamt.de /umweltbundesamt.de /umweltbundesamt Durchführung der Studie: Technische Universität Dresden, Fakultät für Umweltwissenschaften, Institut für Forstbotanik und Forstzoologie, Professur für Forstzoologie, Prof. Dr. Mechthild Roth Pienner Straße 7 (Cotta-Bau), 01737 Tharandt Abschlussdatum: Januar 2017 Redaktion: Fachgebiet IV 1.3 Pflanzenschutz Dr. Mareike Güth, Dr. Daniela Felsmann Publikationen als pdf: http://www.umweltbundesamt.de/publikationen ISSN 1862-4359 Dessau-Roßlau, März 2017 Das diesem Bericht zu Grunde liegende Vorhaben wurde mit Mitteln des Bundesministeriums für Umwelt, Naturschutz, Bau und Reaktorsicherheit unter der Forschungskennzahl 3714 67 406 0 gefördert. Die Verantwortung für den Inhalt dieser Veröffentlichung liegt bei den Autorinnen und Autoren. UBA Texte Entwicklung geeigneter Risikominimierungsansätze für die Luftausbringung von PSM Kurzbeschreibung Die Bekämpfung
  • Page 1 of 7 Moth Species List Froyle Records

    Page 1 of 7 Moth Species List Froyle Records

    Moth species list Froyle Records extracted 9th December 2012 from the moth databases held by the Hampshire & Isle of Wight Branch of Butterfly Conservation. Contains Lepidoptera records in the Froyle Parish, Hampshire. Taxon Vernacular Abrostola tripartita Spectacle Acasis viretata Yellow-barred Brindle Acleris forsskaleana Acleris variegana Garden Rose Tortrix Adaina microdactyla Adela rufimitrella Agapeta hamana Agonopterix arenella Agonopterix heracliana Agriopis leucophaearia Spring Usher Agriopis marginaria Dotted Border Agriphila straminella Agrochola lota Red-line Quaker Agrochola macilenta Yellow-line Quaker Agrotis exclamationis Heart and Dart Agrotis puta Shuttle-shaped Dart Alcis repandata Mottled Beauty Allophyes oxyacanthae Green-brindled Crescent Alucita hexadactyla Twenty-plume Moth Amblyptilia acanthadactyla Amphipyra pyramidea Copper Underwing Amphipyra pyramidea agg. Copper Underwing agg. Anthophila fabriciana Anticlea badiata Shoulder Stripe Anticlea derivata Streamer Apamea crenata Clouded-bordered Brindle Apamea epomidion Clouded Brindle Apamea monoglypha Dark Arches Apamea sordens Rustic Shoulder-knot Apeira syringaria Lilac Beauty Aphomia sociella Bee Moth Aplocera efformata Lesser Treble-bar Archips podana Large Fruit-tree Tortrix Asteroscopus sphinx Sprawler Autographa gamma Silver Y Autographa pulchrina Beautiful Golden Y Axylia putris Flame Batia unitella Biston betularia Peppered Moth Biston strataria Oak Beauty Blastobasis adustella Page 1 of 7 Blastobasis lacticolella Cabera exanthemata Common Wave Cabera
  • Additions, Deletions and Corrections to An

    Additions, Deletions and Corrections to An

    Bulletin of the Irish Biogeographical Society No. 36 (2012) ADDITIONS, DELETIONS AND CORRECTIONS TO AN ANNOTATED CHECKLIST OF THE IRISH BUTTERFLIES AND MOTHS (LEPIDOPTERA) WITH A CONCISE CHECKLIST OF IRISH SPECIES AND ELACHISTA BIATOMELLA (STAINTON, 1848) NEW TO IRELAND K. G. M. Bond1 and J. P. O’Connor2 1Department of Zoology and Animal Ecology, School of BEES, University College Cork, Distillery Fields, North Mall, Cork, Ireland. e-mail: <[email protected]> 2Emeritus Entomologist, National Museum of Ireland, Kildare Street, Dublin 2, Ireland. Abstract Additions, deletions and corrections are made to the Irish checklist of butterflies and moths (Lepidoptera). Elachista biatomella (Stainton, 1848) is added to the Irish list. The total number of confirmed Irish species of Lepidoptera now stands at 1480. Key words: Lepidoptera, additions, deletions, corrections, Irish list, Elachista biatomella Introduction Bond, Nash and O’Connor (2006) provided a checklist of the Irish Lepidoptera. Since its publication, many new discoveries have been made and are reported here. In addition, several deletions have been made. A concise and updated checklist is provided. The following abbreviations are used in the text: BM(NH) – The Natural History Museum, London; NMINH – National Museum of Ireland, Natural History, Dublin. The total number of confirmed Irish species now stands at 1480, an addition of 68 since Bond et al. (2006). Taxonomic arrangement As a result of recent systematic research, it has been necessary to replace the arrangement familiar to British and Irish Lepidopterists by the Fauna Europaea [FE] system used by Karsholt 60 Bulletin of the Irish Biogeographical Society No. 36 (2012) and Razowski, which is widely used in continental Europe.