Turf Insects
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Hunting Billbug Sphenophorus Venatus (Coleoptera: Dryophthoridae) Adult Feeding and Attraction to Warm- and Cool- Season Turfgrasses
The Great Lakes Entomologist Volume 53 Numbers 1 & 2 - Spring/Summer 2020 Numbers Article 8 1 & 2 - Spring/Summer 2020 Hunting Billbug Sphenophorus venatus (Coleoptera: Dryophthoridae) adult feeding and attraction to warm- and cool- season turfgrasses Alexandra Grace Duffy Brigham Young University, [email protected] Douglas S. Richmond Purdue University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.valpo.edu/tgle Part of the Entomology Commons Recommended Citation Duffy, Alexandra Grace and Richmond, Douglas S. "Hunting Billbug Sphenophorus venatus (Coleoptera: Dryophthoridae) adult feeding and attraction to warm- and cool-season turfgrasses," The Great Lakes Entomologist, vol 53 (1) Available at: https://scholar.valpo.edu/tgle/vol53/iss1/8 This Scientific Note is brought to you for free and open access by the Department of Biology at ValpoScholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in The Great Lakes Entomologist by an authorized administrator of ValpoScholar. For more information, please contact a ValpoScholar staff member at [email protected]. Hunting Billbug Sphenophorus venatus (Coleoptera: Dryophthoridae) adult feeding and attraction to warm- and cool-season turfgrasses Cover Page Footnote We thank Danielle Craig and Garrett Price for field assistance. eW are grateful for the cooperation of superintendents and staff at Purdue Sports Turf and William H. Daniel Turfgrass Research and Diagnostic Center. We are grateful for the cooperation of Dr. Ian Kaplan and Ulianova Vidal Gómez for assistance with the olfactometry methods. Dr. Juli Carrillo, Dr. Laura Ingwell, and Dr. Elizabeth Long provided helpful insights on earlier versions of this manuscript. Dr. Diane Silcox Reynolds provided helpful insight and was integral in developing the initial questions during the A. -
Zoysiagrass Genotypes Differ in Susceptibility to the Bluegrass
HORTSCIENCE 46(9):1314–1316. 2011. Studies have evaluated the resistance of cultivars and blends of kentucky bluegrass to the bluegrass billbug (Ahmad and Funk, Zoysiagrass Genotypes Differ in 1982; Lindgren et al., 1981; Shearman et al., 1983). However, currently, there is minimal Susceptibility to the Bluegrass Billbug, information associatedwiththepresenceof bluegrass billbug in Kansas and the suscep- Sphenophorus parvulus tibility of zoysiagrass. Therefore, the objec- tives of this study were to monitor the Jack D. Fry1 presence of bluegrass billbug larvae at the Department of Horticulture, Forestry, and Recreational Resources, Kansas Rocky Ford Turfgrass Research Center State University, 2021 Throckmorton Plant Science Center, Manhattan, KS (Manhattan, KS) and determine the suscepti- 66506 bility of zoysiagrass progeny including re- ciprocal crosses between Z. japonica · Z. Raymond A. Cloyd matrella or between ‘Emerald’ · Z. japonica Department of Entomology, Kansas State University, 123 West Waters Hall, to the bluegrass billbug. Manhattan, KS 66506 Materials and Methods Additional index words. damage, infestation, insect pest, turfgrass, Zoysia spp. Dr. Raymond A. Cloyd (Department of Abstract. Zoysiagrass, in general, has few insect pest problems but may suffer significant Entomology, Kansas State University, damage from infestations of the bluegrass billbug (Sphenophorus parvulus Gyllenhal). Manhattan, KS) identified all the bluegrass This study evaluated ‘Meyer’ and DALZ 0102 zoysiagrass (both Zoysia japonica Steud.) billbug larvae collected from the study area and 31 experimental zoysiagrass progeny, including reciprocal crosses between Z. at the Rocky Ford Turfgrass Research Center japonica · Z. matrella (L.) Merr. or crosses between ‘Emerald’ (Z. japonica · Z. pacifica (Manhattan, KS) during the course of the Goudsw.) · Z. -
Extent of Larval Populations of Turfgrass Insect Pests at Rocky Ford Turfgrass Research Center at Manhattan, KS
Kansas Agricultural Experiment Station Research Reports Volume 4 Issue 6 Turfgrass Research Article 1 2018 Extent of Larval Populations of Turfgrass Insect Pests at Rocky Ford Turfgrass Research Center at Manhattan, KS Raymond A. Cloyd Kansas State University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://newprairiepress.org/kaesrr Part of the Entomology Commons, and the Horticulture Commons Recommended Citation Cloyd, Raymond A. (2018) "Extent of Larval Populations of Turfgrass Insect Pests at Rocky Ford Turfgrass Research Center at Manhattan, KS," Kansas Agricultural Experiment Station Research Reports: Vol. 4: Iss. 6. https://doi.org/10.4148/2378-5977.7591 This report is brought to you for free and open access by New Prairie Press. It has been accepted for inclusion in Kansas Agricultural Experiment Station Research Reports by an authorized administrator of New Prairie Press. Copyright 2018 Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service. Contents of this publication may be freely reproduced for educational purposes. All other rights reserved. Brand names appearing in this publication are for product identification purposes only. No endorsement is intended, nor is criticism implied of similar products not mentioned. K-State Research and Extension is an equal opportunity provider and employer. Extent of Larval Populations of Turfgrass Insect Pests at Rocky Ford Turfgrass Research Center at Manhattan, KS Abstract Many insect pests have a larval or grub stage that resides belowground and feeds on turfgrass roots (Potter, 1998; Vittum et al., 1999; Held and Potter, 2012). The major belowground insect pests (white grubs) associated with turfgrass throughout Midwestern states that are present in Kansas include: May/ June beetles (Phyllophaga spp), masked chafers (Cyclocephala spp), and bluegrass billbug (Sphenophorus parvulus) (Miller et al., 2013). -
Evolution of Colony Characteristics in the Harvester Ant Genus
Evolution of Colony Characteristics in The Harvester Ant Genus Pogonomyrmex Dissertation zur Erlangung des naturwissenschaftlichen Doktorgrades der Bayerischen Julius-Maximilians-Universität Würzburg vorgelegt von Christoph Strehl Nürnberg Würzburg 2005 - 2 - - 3 - Eingereicht am: ......................................................................................................... Mitglieder der Prüfungskommission: Vorsitzender: ............................................................................................................. Gutachter : ................................................................................................................. Gutachter : ................................................................................................................. Tag des Promotionskolloquiums: .............................................................................. Doktorurkunde ausgehändigt am: ............................................................................. - 4 - - 5 - 1. Index 1. Index................................................................................................................. 5 2. General Introduction and Thesis Outline....................................................... 7 1.1 The characteristics of an ant colony...................................................... 8 1.2 Relatedness as a major component driving the evolution of colony characteristics.................................................................................................10 1.3 The evolution -
Seed Predation on Slickspot Peppergrass by The
SEED PREDATION ON SLICKSPOT PEPPERGRASS BY THE OWYHEE HARVESTER ANT By Joshua P. White A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Biology Boise State University May 2009 The thesis presented by Joshua P. White entitled “Seed Predation on Slickspot Peppergrass by the Owyhee Harvester Ant” is hereby approved: ________________________________________________ Ian C. Robertson Date Advisor _______________________________________________ Stephen J. Novak Date Committee Member _______________________________________________ Peter Koetsier Date Committee Member ________________________________________________ John R. Pelton Date Graduate Dean ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would first like to thank my advisor Dr. Ian Robertson for all the advice and time he put in helping me to reach this point. Thank you also to my committee Dr. Steve Novak and Dr. Peter Koetsier for their comments and advisement during the degree process. Thanks you guys for all the help and understanding. A special thank you must go to my family for putting up with me over the last three years while I completed my degree. I would also like to thank Wyatt Williams and Quentin Tuckett who gave me excellent advice on not only the best way to complete my thesis but also prepared me for the process of graduate school. I would also like to thank Dana Quinney, Marjorie McHenry, Jay Weaver and Bill Clark for their ongoing assistance with this project, and Janet Nutting, Kyle Koffin and Justin Stark for their volunteer efforts in the field. The Idaho Army National Guard, Sigma Xi, and the Department of Biological Sciences at Boise State University provided funding for my thesis research. -
Technical Note 38: Description, Propagation, and Establishment of Wetland-Riparian Grass and Grass-Like Species Of
TECHNICAL NOTE USDA - Natural Resources Conservation Service Boise, Idaho – Salt Lake City, Utah TN PLANT MATERIALS NO. 38 OCTOBER 2011 REVISION DESCRIPTION, PROPAGATION, AND ESTABLISHMENT OF WETLAND - RIPARIAN GRASS AND GRASS-LIKE SPECIES IN THE INTERMOUNTAIN WEST J. Chris Hoag, NRCS, Aberdeen, Idaho (Ret.) Derek Tilley, Agronomist, NRCS, Aberdeen, Idaho Dan Ogle, Plant Materials Specialist, NRCS, Boise, Idaho Loren St. John, PMC Team Leader, NRCS, Aberdeen, Idaho A healthy wetland system with a diverse plant community. Photo by Derek Tilley This technical note describes propagation protocols and establishment methods and considerations for wetland and riparian area creation and enhancement. It provides species descriptions for several wetland grass and grass-like species commonly used in the Intermountain West. 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 5 DEFINING RIPARIAN ZONES 5 WETLAND INDICATOR CATEGORIES 8 DIRECT SEEDING 9 Seeding Grasses 9 Seeding Grass-like Wetland Species 10 Hydroseeding 10 TRANSPLANTS 11 Green House Plant Production 11 Wildings 12 Rhizomes 12 Wetland Sod 13 WETLAND TRANSPLANT ESTABLISHMENT 13 WATER MANIPULATION 14 SUMMARY 15 PLANT DATASHEETS 17 NATIVE SPECIES Beckmannia syzigachne American Sloughgrass 18 Calamagrostis canadensis Bluejoint Reedgrass 20 Carex aquatilis Water Sedge 22 Carex nebrascensis Nebraska Sedge 24 Deschampsia cespitosa Tufted Hairgrass 26 Distichlis spicata Inland Saltgrass 29 Eleocharis palustris Creeping Spikerush 31 Glyceria elata Mannagrass 33 Juncus balticus Baltic Rush 35 Schoenoplectus acutus Hardstem Bulrush 38 Schoenoplectus maritimus Cosmopolitan Bulrush 40 Schoenoplectus pungens Threesquare Bulrush 42 Spartina pectinata Prairie Cordgrass 44 Typha latifolia Cattail 46 3 INTRODUCED SPECIES Agrostis gigantea Redtop 48 Alopecurus arundinaceus Creeping Foxtail 51 Elymus hoffmanii RS Hybrid Wheatgrass 54 Phleum pretense Timothy 57 Thinopyrum ponticum Tall Wheatgrass 60 APPENDIX Table 1. -
The Ecology of Nest Movement in Social Insects
EN57CH15-McGlynn ARI 31 October 2011 8:2 The Ecology of Nest Movement in Social Insects Terrence P. McGlynn Department of Biology, California State University Dominguez Hills, Carson, California 90747; email: [email protected] Annu. Rev. Entomol. 2012. 57:291–308 Keywords First published online as a Review in Advance on absconding, ant, emigration, migration, nomadism, relocation September 9, 2011 The Annual Review of Entomology is online at Abstract ento.annualreviews.org Social insect colonies are typically mobile entities, moving nests from one This article’s doi: Annu. Rev. Entomol. 2012.57:291-308. Downloaded from www.annualreviews.org location to another throughout the life of a colony. The majority of social in- by California State University - Dominguez Hills on 12/13/11. For personal use only. 10.1146/annurev-ento-120710-100708 sect species—ants, bees, wasps, and termites—have likely adopted the habit Copyright c 2012 by Annual Reviews. ! of relocating nests periodically. The syndromes of nest relocation include All rights reserved legionary nomadism, unstable nesting, intrinsic nest relocation, and adven- 0066-4170/12/0107-0291$20.00 titious nest relocation. The emergence of nest movement is a functional response to a broad range of potential selective forces, including colony growth, competition, foraging efficiency, microclimate, nest deterioration, nest quality, parasitism, predation, and seasonality. Considering the great taxonomic and geographic distribution of nest movements, assumptions re- garding the nesting biology of social insects should be reevaluated, including our understanding of population genetics, life-history evolution, and the role of competition in structuring communities. 291 EN57CH15-McGlynn ARI 31 October 2011 8:2 INTRODUCTION It is a popular misconception that social insect colonies are sessile entities. -
BLUEGRASS BILLBUG (Sphenophorus Parvulus) Prepared
BLUEGRASS BILLBUG (Sphenophorus parvulus) Prepared by: Dr. M. Keith Kennedy Extension Specialist Department of Entomology Michigan State University The bluegrass billbug is a common turf pest which occasionally causes extensive damage to home lawns. These beetles are named because of their long snout or "bill" which ends in a set of small mandibles or jaws. They are usually seen in the spring (April-early May) or late fall (September- October) wandering about on sidewalks, drive ways, or patio's. The presence of billbugs in the lawn is generally not detected until the first signs of damage appear. Often this damage is attributed to other causes. The following information should assist you in becoming more familiar with this turf pest. Sphenophorus parvulus Hpsts Kentucky Bluegrass (Poa pratensis) Characteristic Damage spotty dead patches of turf scattered throughout the laWn in July and August. How to Recognize Adults - dull grey (lots of scales) to black or brown beetles, h+h" long, with a snout or bill. Adults have wings but seldqft fly* Larvae - white, leggless, 5/8" long, humpbacked grubs with a yellow to brown head capsule. Adult Larva l/l^icich 1/If. inch Damaging Stages adults feed on grass blades or stems but the major damage is caused by larvae feeding in the stem and roots. Life Cycle Billbugs overwinter as adults and become active as temperatures begin to warm in April. Eggs are first laid in grass stems in early May but most eggs are deposited in early June. (See Fig- 1) Eggs hatch in two weeks and the larvae tunnel down through the grass stem into the crown and eventually settle the roots. -
Seed Preference in a Desert Harvester Ant, Messor Pergandei
Seed preference in a desert harvester ant, Messor pergandei Tonia Brito-Bersi1, Emily Dawes1, Richard Martinez2, Alexander McDonald1 University of California, Santa Cruz1, University of California, Riverside2 ABSTRACT Optimal foraging theory states that foragers maximize their energy intake by minimizing the energy expended to collect their food. The harvester ant, Messor pergandei, provides a model system to study foraging energy expenditure due to their dependable group foraging behavior. Exploring seed preference could give us further insight into how their harvesting affects the surrounding vegetation and ecosystem as a whole. Choice trials were conducted on M. pergandei using three native seeds and one non- native food source to determine ant foraging activity for each food type. Additionally, a choice trial involving Encelia seeds and bract were conducted to determine the preference for seed predation versus organic matter collection. Our results showed that Encelia and wheat had the most ant activity. For our second trial, we found that M.pergandei visited Encelia bract more than Encelia seed. Our findings suggest that M. pregandei display a previously undocumented preference for bract and they are willing to forgo other food options that have higher lipid and nutrient content to collect it. This could provide further insight into their overall role in the desert ecosystem as they may be assisting Encelia in seed dispersal. Keywords: Messor pergandei, Encelia, Colorado Desert, optimal foraging theory INTRODUCTION harsh abiotic factors such as low food resources. Individuals that optimize According to optimal foraging theory, foraging efficiency by selecting food types species are expected to maximize energy that are highly nutritious and readily gain while minimizing costs of foraging available will have greater chance of survival. -
Red Harvester Ants Bastiaan M
E-402 4-06 Red Harvester Ants Bastiaan M. Drees* ed harvester ants are one of the more Life cycle noticeable and larger ants in open areas in Texas. Eleven species in this group of ants Winged males and females swarm, couple and R mate, especially following rains. Winged forms (genus Pogonomyrmex) are known from the state. are larger than worker ants. Males soon die and However, harvester ants are not nearly as com- females seek a suitable nesting site. After drop- mon today as they were during the earlier 1900s. ping her wings, the queen ant digs a burrow and The decline, particularly in the eastern part of produces a few eggs. Larvae hatch from eggs and the state, has caused some alarm because these develop through several stages (instars). Larvae ants serve as a major source of food for the are white and legless, shaped like a crookneck rapidly disappearing and threatened Texas squash with a small distinct head. Pupation horned lizard. occurs within a cocoon. Worker ants produced by the queen ant begin caring for other develop- Description ing ants, enlarge the nest and forage for food. 1 1 Worker ants are ⁄4 to ⁄2 inch long and red to Pest status dark brown. They have squarish heads and no spines on the body. There are 22 species of har- Worker ants can give a painful, stinging bite, vester ants in the United States, 10 of which are but are generally reluctant to attack. Effects of found in Texas. Seven of these species are found the bite can spread along lymph channels and only in far west Texas. -
White Grubs and Billbugs: Control in Home Lawns
White Grubs and Billbugs: Control in Home Lawns Fact Sheet No. 5.516 Insect Series|Home and Garden by W.S. Cranshaw* White grubs and billbugs can be Quick Facts important pests of turfgrass in parts of Colorado. Both groups of insects feed below • Billbugs and white grubs ground and damage roots or feed within the are insects that damage turf growing crown area of the plant. grasses by feeding on the roots. • Heavy infestations of white grubs may kill grass or attract mammals, such as skunks, that damage grass when digging to feed on grubs. Figure 1a: White grub. Figure 1b: Billbug larva. • White grubs are best Photos by David Shetlar, The Ohio State Univer- Figure 2: White grub in root zone of a lawn. sity. controlled with insecticides Photo by David Shetlar, The Ohio State University. when eggs are beginning to White Grubs hatch. White grubs feed on the roots of grasses and usually can be found within the top • Billbugs are best controlled couple inches of soil. The body is creamy when adults are present on white with a reddish-brown head and the surface of the lawn in they have three pairs of legs on the thorax. spring. Normally they will be seen to curve their bodies into a distinctive C-shape and grubs of • Insect parasitic nematodes the larger Colorado species may reach nearly are a biological control option 1 inch long. for both white grubs and White grubs are the most damaging billbugs. insects in that occur in Colorado, and native • Lawns that are adequately species have long been particularly common Figure 3: Damaged sod pulled back to expose white grub larvae. -
A S H I F T in Seed Harvesting by Ants Following Argentine a N T I N Va S I O N
VIE ET MILIEU - LIFE AND ENVIRONMENT, 2007, 57 (1/2) : 75-81 A S H I F T IN SEED HARVESTING BY ANTS FOLLOWING ARGENTINE A N T I N VA S I O N J. OLIVERAS*, J. M. BAS, C. GÓMEZ Department of Environmental Sciences, University of Girona, Campus de Montilivi s/n, 17071 Girona, Spain *corresponding author: [email protected] HARVESTER ANTS A B S T R A C T. – The effect of A rgentine ant (Linepithema humile) invasion on the dispersal - INVASION predation balance of non-myrmecochorous seeds by ants and vertebrates is analyzed. T h r e e LINEPITHEMA HUMILE NON-MYRECOCHOROUS SEEDS Papilionaceae, Calicotome spinosa, Psoralea bituminosa, and S p a rtium junceum, were studied. SEED DISPERSAL The seeds were made available in field trials during 48 hour periods using ant and vertebrate SEED PREDATION exclusions in zones invaded by L. humile and non-invaded zones. The A rgentine ant invasion resulted in the displacement of most of the native ant species, including the single seed predator ant in the non-invaded zone, Messor bouvieri. C o n s e q u e n t l y, the level of seed removal by ants was lower in the invaded zone for the three seed species. This could produce two opposite e ffects for the plant: a positive reduction of seed predation and a negative loss of seed dispersal due to diszoochory (the seed dispersal performed by seed eating ants). The three studied species s u ffered different intensities of seed removal by ants in the non-invaded zone, so they would be a ffected to varying degrees after the invasion.