DOCSLIB.ORG

Corporate Governance 2018 11Th Edition a Practical Cross-Border Insight Into Corporate Governance

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Corporate Governance 2018 11Th Edition a Practical Cross-Border Insight Into Corporate Governance ICLGThe International Comparative Legal Guide to: Corporate Governance 2018 11th Edition A practical cross-border insight into corporate governance Published by Global Legal Group, with contributions from: Advokatfirman Lindahl Miyetti Law Aksac Law Office Montel&Manciet Advocats Arnold Bloch Leibler Nielsen Nørager Law Firm LLP Ashurst Hong Kong Nishimura & Asahi Astrea Novotny Advogados Borenius Attorneys Ltd Ritch, Mueller, Heather y Nicolau, S.C. bpv Hügel Rechtsanwälte GmbH Slaughter and May Čechová & Partners SZA Schilling, Zutt & Anschütz Rechtsanwaltsgesellschaft mbH CR Partners Szarvas and Partners Law Firm Ferraiuoli LLC Taylors in association with Walkers Genesis Law Corporation Tian Yuan Law Firm Georgiev, Todorov & Co. Trevisan & Associati Glatzová & Co. Trilegal GRATA International UGGC Law Firm Guevara & Gutiérrez S.C. Villey Girard Grolleaud Houthoff Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz Lee & Ko Walalangi & Partners in association with Nishimura & Asahi Lenz & Staehelin WBW Weremczuk Bobeł & Partners Attorneys at Law McCann FitzGerald WH Partners The International Comparative Legal Guide to: Corporate Governance 2018 General Chapter: 1 Corporate Governance, Investor Stewardship and Engagement – Sabastian V. Niles, Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz 1 Country Question and Answer Chapters: Contributing Editor Sabastian V. Niles, Wachtell, 2 Albania CR Partners: Anisa Rrumbullaku & Tea Take 6 Lipton, Rosen & Katz Sales Director 3 Andorra Montel&Manciet Advocats: Maïtena Manciet Fouchier & Florjan Osmani Liliana Ranaldi González 12 Account Director Oliver Smith 4 Australia Arnold Bloch Leibler: Jonathan Wenig & Jeremy Lanzer 16 Sales Support Manager 5 Austria bpv Hügel Rechtsanwälte GmbH: Dr. Christoph Nauer & Dr. Daniel Reiter 23 Toni Hayward 6 Astrea: Steven De Schrijver 31 Senior Editors Belgium Suzie Levy 7 Bermuda Taylors in association with Walkers: Natalie Neto 39 Caroline Collingwood CEO 8 Bolivia Guevara & Gutiérrez S.C.: Jorge Inchauste & José Bernal 46 Dror Levy 9 Brazil Novotny Advogados: Paulo Eduardo Penna 51 Group Consulting Editor Alan Falach 10 Bulgaria Georgiev, Todorov & Co.: Georgi Georgiev & Monika Markova 59 Publisher Rory Smith 11 China Tian Yuan Law Firm: Raymond Shi (石磊) 65 Published by 12 Czech Republic Glatzová & Co.: Jindřich Král & Pavol Černý 72 Global Legal Group Ltd. 59 Tanner Street 13 Denmark Nielsen Nørager Law Firm LLP: Peter Lyck & Thomas Melchior Fischer 79 London SE1 3PL, UK Tel: +44 20 7367 0720 14 Finland Borenius Attorneys Ltd: Andreas Doepel 87 Fax: +44 20 7407 5255 Email: [email protected] 15 France Villey Girard Grolleaud: Pascale Girard & Léopold Cahen 93 URL: www.glgroup.co.uk GLG Cover Design 16 Germany SZA Schilling, Zutt & Anschütz Rechtsanwaltsgesellschaft mbH: F&F Studio Design Dr. Christoph Nolden & Dr. Michaela Balke 100 GLG Cover Image Source 17 Hong Kong Ashurst Hong Kong: Joshua Cole 107 iStockphoto Printed by 18 Hungary Szarvas and Partners Law Firm: Julia Szarvas 112 Stephens & George Print Group 19 India Trilegal: Kosturi Ghosh & Wiseroy Damodaran 119 August 2018 20 Indonesia Walalangi & Partners in association with Nishimura & Asahi: Copyright © 2018 Fiesta Victoria & T. Anggra Syah Reza 126 Global Legal Group Ltd. All rights reserved 21 Ireland McCann FitzGerald: David Byers & Paul Heffernan 132 No photocopying 22 Italy Trevisan & Associati: Dario Trevisan & Paolo Preda 139 ISBN 978-1-912509-20-1 ISSN 1756-1035 23 Japan Nishimura & Asahi: Nobuya Matsunami & Kaoru Tatsumi 146 Strategic Partners 24 Kazakhstan GRATA International: Bolat Miyatov & Igor Lukin 153 25 Korea Lee & Ko: Sungmin Kim & Jang Hyuk Yeo 159 26 Malta WH Partners: James Scicluna & Gabriella Zammit 166 27 Mexico Ritch, Mueller, Heather y Nicolau, S.C.: Luis Dantón Martínez Corres & Alejandra Lankenau Ramírez 174 28 Morocco UGGC Law Firm: Ali Bougrine 181 29 Netherlands Houthoff: Alexander J. Kaarls & Duco Poppema 188 30 Nigeria Miyetti Law: Jennifer Douglas-Abubakar & Khadija Bala 194 31 Poland WBW Weremczuk Bobeł & Partners Attorneys at Law: Łukasz Bobeł & Krzysztof Weremczuk 201 Continued Overleaf Further copies of this book and others in the series can be ordered from the publisher. Please call +44 20 7367 0720 Disclaimer This publication is for general information purposes only. It does not purport to provide comprehensive full legal or other advice. Global Legal Group Ltd. and the contributors accept no responsibility for losses that may arise from reliance upon information contained in this publication. This publication is intended to give an indication of legal issues upon which you may need advice. Full legal advice should be taken from a qualified professional when dealing with specific situations. WWW.ICLG.COM The International Comparative Legal Guide to: Corporate Governance 2018 Country Question and Answer Chapters: 32 Puerto Rico Ferraiuoli LLC: Fernando J. Rovira-Rullán & Yarot Lafontaine-Torres 208 33 Singapore Genesis Law Corporation: Benjamin Choo & Bernice Man 214 34 Slovakia Čechová & Partners: Katarína Čechová & Ivan Kolenič 221 35 Sweden Advokatfirman Lindahl: Carl-Olof Bouveng & Maria Arnoldsson 227 36 Switzerland Lenz & Staehelin: Patrick Schleiffer & Andreas von Planta 233 37 Turkey Aksac Law Office: Arzu Aksaç & Yaprak Derbentli 241 38 United Kingdom Slaughter and May: William Underhill 248 39 USA Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz: Sabastian V. Niles 253 EDITORIAL Welcome to the eleventh edition of The International Comparative Legal Guide to: Corporate Governance. This guide provides corporate counsel and international practitioners with a comprehensive worldwide legal analysis of the laws and regulations of corporate governance. It is divided into two main sections: One general chapter. This chapter provides an overview of Corporate Governance, Investor Stewardship and Engagement, particularly from a US perspective. The guide is divided into country question and answer chapters. These provide a broad overview of common issues in corporate governance laws and regulations in 38 jurisdictions. All chapters are written by leading corporate governance lawyers and industry specialists, and we are extremely grateful for their excellent contributions. Special thanks are reserved for the contributing editor Sabastian V. Niles of Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz for his invaluable assistance. Global Legal Group hopes that you find this guide practical and interesting. The International Comparative Legal Guide series is also available online at www.iclg.com. Alan Falach LL.M. Group Consulting Editor Global Legal Group [email protected] Chapter 21 Ireland David Byers McCann FitzGerald Paul Heffernan the Corporate Governance Code or the Corporate Governance 1 Setting the Scene – Sources and Guidelines for small quoted companies (a non-mandatory Code). Overview Financial institutions are also required to comply with the Corporate Governance Requirements published by the CBI. In the private 1.1 What are the main corporate entities to be discussed? sector, there are a significant number of companies which are State- owned, and these must comply with the Code of Practice for the This chapter deals primarily with Irish incorporated companies with Governance of State Bodies (last updated in 2016). shares admitted to trading on the Main Market of Euronext Dublin Guidelines and pronouncements of shareholder representative (previously the Irish Stock Exchange) (the “Main Market”, which organisations (such as the Irish Association of Investment Managers) is a regulated market) or listed on the Enterprise Securities Market on corporate governance practices, while not having the force of (“ESM”) of Euronext Dublin. Credit institutions and insurance law, are usually observed. undertakings are also referenced, given the focus of the Central Bank of Ireland (“CBI”) in improving corporate governance standards. 1.3 What are the current topical issues, developments, trends and challenges in corporate governance? 1.2 What are the main legislative, regulatory and other sources regulating corporate governance practices? The CBI has stringent corporate governance requirements for all Irish credit institutions, insurance undertakings and captive The law is stated as of 9 May 2018. The primary corporate governance insurance/reinsurance undertakings, which were updated in 2015. legislation is contained in the Companies Act 2014, as amended (the Fitness and probity requirements apply in respect of the appointment “Companies Act”). Irish incorporated companies with securities of directors and senior managers. CBI approval is required prior to admitted to trading on a regulated market are subject to additional appointment to key roles. EU-based regulations, primarily the Shareholders’ Rights (Directive The EU (Disclosure of Non-Financial and Diversity Information by 2007/36/EC) Regulations 2009 (“Shareholder Rights Regulations”), Certain Large Undertakings and Groups) Regulations 2017 were the Transparency (Directive 2004/109/EC) Regulations 2007 and the introduced on 21 August 2017. The obligations to provide the non- EU Market Abuse Regulation (596/2014) (“MAR”). financial information and a diversity report are “comply or explain” MAR took effect on 3 July 2016 and extended the application of in nature and apply to any company that is a “large company”, has the existing market abuse and inside information regime beyond an average number of employees exceeding 500 and is an “ineligible issuers with shares admitted to trading on EU-regulated markets, entity”. An “ineligible entity” includes a company
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Affiliate Companies in Ethiopia Analysis of Organization, Legal
    ADDIS ABABA UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES AFFILIATE COMPANIES IN ETHIOPIA: ANALYSIS OF ORGANIZATION, LEGAL FRAME WORK AND THE CURRENT PRACTICE By: Mehamed Aliye Waritu Advisor: Ato Seyoum Yohannes (LL.B, LL.M) Faculty of Law ADDIS ABABA University January, 2010 www.chilot.me Affiliate Companies in Ethiopia: Analysis of Organization, Legal Frame Work and the Current Practice A Thesis Submitted In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements of the LLM Degree (Business Law) By Mehamed Aliye Waritu Advisor Ato Seyoum Yohannes At the Faculty of Law of the Addis Ababa University Jaunary,2010 www.chilot.me Declaration The thesis is my original work, has not been submitted for a degree in any other University and that all materials used have been duly acknowledged. Signature of confirmation Name Mehamed Aliye Waritu Signature_______________________ Date_________________________ Name of Advisor Seyoum Yohannes Signature_______________________ Date_________________________ www.chilot.me Approval Sheet by the Board of Examiners Affiliate Companies in Ethiopia: Analysis of Organization, Legal framework and the current practice Submitted, to Faculty of Law Addis Ababa University, in partial fulfilment of the requirements of LLM Degree (Business Law) By: Mehamed Aliye Waritu Approved by board of Examiners. Name Sign. 1. Advisor Seyoum Yohannes _______________ 2. Examiner __________________ _______________ 3. Examiner ___________________ _______________ www.chilot.me Acknowledgement Thanks be to Allah for helping me see the fruit of my endeavor. The thesis would not have been completed with out the support and guidance of my advisor Ato Seyoum yohannes. My special thanks goes to him. I am also indebted to my mother Shashuu Buttaa, my wife Caltu Haji and my brother Ibrahim Aliye for they have been validating, supporting and encouraging in my career development and to complete this work.
    [Show full text]
  • General Meetings in Ireland: Overview, Practical Law UK Practice Note Overview
    General meetings in Ireland: overview, Practical Law UK Practice Note Overview... General meetings in Ireland: overview by PL Corporate Ireland, with thanks to David Brangam, Partner, Christine Quigley, Associate, and Jenny McGowran, Head of Corporate Services at Simmons & Simmons, Dublin Practice note: overview | Maintained | Ireland An overview of the key provisions of the Companies Act 2014, the Listing Rules of the Irish stock exchange trading as Euronext Dublin, the Irish Annex to the UK Corporate Governance Code and institutional investor guidance which regulate the holding of a general meeting (including an AGM). It covers how general meetings are called, the requirements for notice of a meeting and documents accompanying the notice, quorum requirements, how resolutions are proposed and passed at a general meeting and practical guidance on running an effective general meeting. Scope of this note Types of companies Traded PLC Types of general meeting Annual general meeting Extraordinary general meetings Written resolutions of members Calling a general meeting Meetings called by the board Meetings requisitioned by members Members' right to convene an EGM directly Meetings ordered by the court Auditor's ability to call meetings Liquidator's ability to call meetings Examiner's ability to call meetings Shareholders' rights in relation to general meetings Notice of meeting Notice of a meeting of a PLC Contents of notice Entitlement to receive notice How notice is given Notice periods for holding meetings © 2020 Thomson Reuters. All rights
    [Show full text]
  • Ownership and Control of Private Firms
    WJEC BUSINESS STUDIES A LEVEL 2008 Spec. Issue 2 2012 Page 1 RESOURCES. Ownership and Control of Private Firms. Introduction Sole traders are the most popular of business Business managers as a businesses steadily legal forms, owned and often run by a single in- grows in size, are in the main able to cope, dividual they are found on every street corner learn and develop new skills. Change is grad- in the country. A quick examination of a busi- ual, there are few major shocks. Unfortu- ness directory such as yellow pages, will show nately business growth is unlikely to be a that there are thousands in every town or city. steady process, with regular growth of say There are both advantages and disadvantages 5% a year. Instead business growth often oc- to operating as a sole trader, and these are: curs as rapid bursts, followed by a period of steady growth, then followed again by a rapid Advantages. burst in growth.. Easy to set up – it is just a matter of in- The change in legal form of business often forming the Inland Revenue that an individ- mirrors this growth pattern. The move from ual is self employed and registering for sole trader to partnership involves injections class 2 national insurance contributions of further capital, move into new markets or within three months of starting in business. market niches. The switch from partnership Low cost – no legal formalities mean there to private limited company expands the num- is little administrative costs to setting up ber of manager / owners, moves and rear- as a sole trader.
    [Show full text]
  • Limited Liability Partnerships
    inbrief Limited Liability Partnerships Inside Key features Incorporation and administration Members’ Agreements Taxation inbrief Introduction Key features • any members’ agreement is a confidential Introduction document; and It first became possible to incorporate limited Originally conceived as a vehicle liability partnerships (“LLPs”) in the UK in 2001 • the accounting and filing requirements are for use by professional practices to after the Limited Liability Partnerships Act 2000 essentially the same as those for a company. obtain the benefit of limited liability came into force. LLPs have an interesting An LLP can be incorporated with two or more background. In the late 1990s some of the major while retaining the tax advantages of members. A company can be a member of an UK accountancy firms faced big negligence claims a partnership, LLPs have a far wider LLP. As noted, it is a distinct legal entity from its and were experiencing a difficult market for use as is evidenced by their increasing members and, accordingly, can contract and own professional indemnity insurance. Their lobbying property in its own right. In this respect, as in popularity as an alternative business of the Government led to the introduction of many others, an LLP is more akin to a company vehicle in a wide range of sectors. the Limited Liability Partnerships Act 2000 which than a partnership. The members of an LLP, like gave birth to the LLP as a new business vehicle in the shareholders of a company, have limited the UK. LLPs were originally seen as vehicles for liability. As he is an agent, when a member professional services partnerships as demonstrated contracts on behalf of the LLP, he binds the LLP as by the almost immediate conversion of the major a director would bind a company.
    [Show full text]
  • AIG Guide to Key Features of Private Limited Companies
    PrivateEdge Key features and requirements of private limited companies It is crucial for businesses set up as private limited companies to comply with the requirements of the Companies Act 2006. This guidance note sets out the key legal requirements for private limited companies in the UK, discusses shareholders’ rights and duties, and the process for convening company meetings and the passing of resolutions 1 What is a private limited company? 1.1 A private limited company is the most common form of trading vehicle for companies in the UK. 1.2 The key features and requirements of a private limited company are that: – It will have a separate legal personality from its owners (shareholders). – Responsibility for the management of a company generally falls to its directors; – The liability of each shareholder for the company's debt and other liabilities is generally limited to the amount which remains unpaid on that shareholder's shares; • It must have an issued share capital comprising at least one share. Each issued share must have a fixed nominal value. The ways in which a company can alter its share capital is strictly controlled by the Companies Act 2006 (“CA 2006”). There are also strict statutory controls on a company's ability to make returns of value (dividends) to its shareholders; • It must have at least one director. A private limited company is not required to have a company secretary, although it may choose to do so; and • The nominal value of a private limited company does not have to exceed a specified amount. It is common practice for a private company to be incorporated with a share capital made up of just one £1 share.
    [Show full text]
  • •One Person Company •Limited Liability Partnership •Private
    Corporatization of MSME More than 90% of MSMEs are proprietorship or partnership enterprise. Therefore, it is imperative to strive towards corporatisation of Small & Medium Enterprises for good corporate governance as well as energise the economy as a whole. MSME may be incorporated as: •One Person Company •Limited Liability Partnership •Private Company •Public Company One Person Company “One Person Company” means a company which has only one person as a member. • An OPC is incorporated as a private limited company, where there is only one member and prohibition in regard to invitation to the public for subscription of the securities of the company. • The Salient features of an OPC include the following: An OPC can be formed under Company limited by guarantee or shares. An OPC limited by shares shall have minimum paid up capital of Rs. 1 lakh. An OPC are restricted from the right to transfer its share and Prohibits any invitations to public to subscribe for the securities • An OPC is required to give a legal identity by specifying a name under which the activities of the business could be carried on. The words 'One Person Company' should be mentioned below the name of the company, wherever the name is affixed, used or engraved. PROCESS OF INCORPORATION OF ONE PERSON COMPANY (OPC) • Obtain Digital Signature Certificate [DSC] for the proposed Director(s) • Obtain Director Identification Number [DIN] for the proposed director(s). • Select suitable Company Name, and make an application to the Ministry of Corporate Affairs for availability of name. • Draft MOA & AOA • Sign and file various documents including MOA & AOA with the Registrar of Companies electronically.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 4 Corporate Governance in the Ece Region
    ________________________________________________________________________________________________103 CHAPTER 4 CORPORATE GOVERNANCE IN THE ECE REGION The recent financial scandals at major United States corporations have highlighted the costs of corporate governance failures and have put corporate governance reform firmly on the policy agenda. Within the ECE region, there are basically two established models of corporate governance, one prevalent in the Anglo-Saxon countries, the other in continental Europe. They differ from one another in several ways, including who exercises control, in the structure of the board and of ownership at large, in their focus on shareholder or stakeholder interests and in the degree of protection they offer to shareholder and creditor rights. However, neither system has proven demonstrably superior to the other. Powerful forces, such as the need to access foreign capital markets, the pressure of institutional investors and the drive to create a single European market in financial services, are creating considerable pressure for convergence of these systems. However, a system of corporate governance, like a society’s other important institutions, is not easily transplanted. Even more so than in mature market economies, the corporate governance systems in central and eastern Europe and in the CIS remain works in progress. While progress on the legal protection of shareholder and creditor rights has been quite impressive, considerable enforcement gaps persist, particularly in the CIS, constraining firms in their access to outside finance. 4.1 Introduction corporat e governance since the creat ion of the count ry’s securit ies regulation regime in the 1930s. Viewing the Corporate governance has become a subject of situation in the United States with alarm, European heightened import ance and attent ion in government countries, mindful of earlier financial scandals of their policy circles, academia and the popular press throughout own, are examining their own syst ems of corporate the ECE region.
    [Show full text]
  • Paper-3: Setting up of Business Entities and Closure
    STUDY MATERIAL EXECUTIVE PROGRAMME SETTING UP OF BUSINESS ENTITIES AND CLOSURE MODULE 1 PAPER 3 i © THE INSTITUTE OF COMPANY SECRETARIES OF INDIA TIMING OF HEADQUARTERS Monday to Friday Office Timings – 9.00 A.M. to 5.30 P.M. Public Dealing Timings Without financial transactions – 9.30 A.M. to 5.00 P.M. With financial transactions – 9.30 A.M. to 4.00 P.M. Phones 011-45341000 Fax 011-24626727 Website www.icsi.edu E-mail [email protected] Laser Typesetting by AArushi Graphics, Prashant Vihar, New Delhi, and Printed at H T Media/September 2020 ii EXECUTIVE PROGRAMME SETTING UP OF BUSINESS ENTITIES AND CLOSURE There are various business structures such as Companies, LLP, Trusts, and Societies etc. which one can choose to start a business. Choosing a form of business entity is crucial to a successful organization. The choice of a business entity will depend on an object, benefits, size of the business of such entity and many other factors. The main types of business entities in India are Sole Proprietorship, Partnership, Hindu Undivided Family (HUF) Business, Limited Liability Partnership (LLP), Co-operative Societies, Branch Office and Company which may be any kind of company including One Person Company (OPC), private company, public company, company limited by guarantee, subsidiary company, statutory company, insurance company or unlimited company, company formed under section 8 of the Companies Act, 2013 or under section 25 of the earlier Companies Act, 1956. Various laws are applicable for proceeding to incorporate a business entity. Initial Registrations like Shops & Establishment, FSSAI, ISO, MSME, copyright, patent etc.
    [Show full text]
  • I. Differences Between a Co-Operative and a PC in India II. Comparison Of
    I. Differences between a co-operative and a PC in India Feature Co-operative PC Registration under Co-op societies Act Companies Act Membership Open to any individual or co- Only to producer members operative and their agencies Professionals on Board Not provided Can be co-opted Area of operation Restricted Throughout India Relation with other entities Only transaction based Can form joint ventures and alliances Shares Not tradable Tradable within membership only Member stakes No linkage with no. of shares Articles of association can held provide for linking shares and delivery rights Voting rights One person one vote but RoC Only one member one vote and government have veto and non-producer can’t vote power Reserves Can be created if made profit Mandatory to create reserves Profit sharing Limited dividend on capital Based on patronage but reserves must and limit on dividend Role of government Significant Minimal Disclosure and audit Annual report to regulator Very strict as per the requirements Companies Act Administrative control Excessive None External equity No provision No provision Borrowing power Restricted Many options Dispute settlement Through co-op system Through arbitration II. Comparison of diff options for registration under the companies Act Type of company> Private limited Limited Company PC Parameter Company Minimum No. of 2 3 5 Directors required Number of Members Minimum 2; Minimum 7 Minimum 10 primary Maximum 50 producer members or two producer institutional members Membership Any one Any one Only primary eligibility producer or producer institutions can be member. Type of shares Equity and Equity and Preference Only Equity Preference Voting rights based on number of based on number of Only one vote equity shares held equity shares held irrespective of number of shares held.
    [Show full text]
  • Lesson : 1 Meaning, Characteristics and Types of a Company
    LESSON : 1 MEANING, CHARACTERISTICS AND TYPES OF A COMPANY STRUCTURE 1.0 Objective 1.1 Introduction 1.2 Meaning of Company 1.3 Characteristics of a Company 1.4 Distinction between Company and Partnership 1.5 Types of Company 1.6 Summary 1.7 Keywords 1.8 Self Assessment Questions 1.9 Suggested Readings 1.0 OBJECTIVE After reading this lesson, you should be able to: (a) Define a company and explain its features. (b) Make a distribution between company and partnership firm. (c) Explain the various types of companies. 1.1 INTRODUCTION Industrial has revolution led to the emergence of large scale business organizations. These organization require big investments and the risk involved is very high. Limited resources and unlimited liability of partners are two important limitations of partnerships of partnerships in undertaking big business. Joint Stock Company form of business organization has become extremely popular as it provides a solution to (1) overcome the limitations of partnership business. The Multinational companies like Coca-Cola and, General Motors have their investors and customers spread throughout the world. The giant Indian Companies may include the names like Reliance, Talco Bajaj Auto, Infosys Technologies, Hindustan Lever Ltd., Ranbaxy Laboratories Ltd., and Larsen and Tubro etc. 1.2 MEANING OF COMPANY Section 3 (1) (i) of the Companies Act, 1956 defines a company as “a company formed and registered under this Act or an existing company”. Section 3(1) (ii) Of the act states that “an existing company means a company formed and registered under any of the previous companies laws”. This definition does not reveal the distinctive characteristics of a company .
    [Show full text]
  • Commonly Used International Entity Types
    Commonly Used International Entity Types COUNTRY/REGION ENTITY STRUCTURE BASIC FORMATION REQUIREMENTS Minimum Registered Corporate Secretary Minimum # of Minimum # of Directors Legal Liability ASIA-PACIFIC Capital Address Shareholders/Partners Australia Public Company (Limited or Ltd.) AUD 0 Required One Unlimited Three. At least 2 must be Limited to the amount local residents subscribed for shares Private or Proprietary Company AUD 0 Required Not required 1-50 One. At least 1 must be Limited to the amount (Pty. Ltd. or Proprietary Limited) local resident subscribed for shares China Limited Liability Company CNY 0 Required Not required. But a 1-50 Board of directors or a Limited to the amount local representative single executive director subscribed for shares may be required. Company Limited by Shares CNY 0 Required Not required 2-200 Board of directors Limited to the amount required subscribed for shares Partnership CNY 0 Required Not required 2-50 Partner managed Not a separate legal entity from its parent Hong Kong Limited Private Company HKD 0 Required Required, must be local 1-50 Board of directors Limited to the amount resident or company required subscribed for shares India Private Limited Company (Pvt Ltd) INR 0 Required Required if initial 2-200 Two. At least 1 must be Limited to the amount capital investment local resident subscribed for shares exceeds INR100 million Limited Liability Partnership (LLP) INR 0 Required N/A Two. At least 1 must be Partner managed Limited to the amount local resident subscribed for shares Japan General Corporation (Kabushiki JPY 1 Required Not required Unlimited One Limited to the amount Kaisha) subscribed for shares Limited Liability Company (Godo- JPY 1 Required Not required Unlimited Managed by managing Limited to the amount Kaisha) members subscribed for shares Singapore Private Limited Company (Private $1 in any Required Required and must be 1-50 One.
    [Show full text]
  • Corporate Governance Report 35
    ŽƌƉŽƌĂƚĞ'ŽǀĞƌŶĂŶĐĞZĞƉŽƌƚ ŽƌƉŽƌĂƚĞ'ŽǀĞƌŶĂŶĐĞĞĐůĂƌĂƟŽŶŝŶĂĐĐŽƌĚĂŶĐĞǁŝƚŚΑϮϰϯĐĂŶĚΑϮϲϳďh'ര രϯϲ DĂŶĂŐĞŵĞŶƚŽĂƌĚര രϰϬ ^ƵƉĞƌǀŝƐŽƌLJŽĂƌĚĂŶĚŶŶƵĂů'ĞŶĞƌĂůDĞĞƟŶŐര രϰϮ ŽŵƉŽƐŝƟŽŶ ര രϰϯ Independence of Supervisory Board members ര രϰϱ Diversity ര രϰϲ ZĞůĂƚĞĚWĂƌƚLJdƌĂŶƐĂĐƟŽŶƐ ര രϰϲ ŽŵŵŝƩĞĞƐ ര രϰϲ ZĞŵƵŶĞƌĂƟŽŶZĞƉŽƌƚ͗DĂŶĂŐĞŵĞŶƚĂŶĚ^ƵƉĞƌǀŝƐŽƌLJŽĂƌĚƐര രϰϵ ŝƌĞĐƚŽƌƐ͛,ŽůĚŝŶŐƐΘĞĂůŝŶŐƐര രϱϯ Corporate Governance Report 35 Corporate Governance Declaration in accordance with § 243c and § 267b UGB CORPORATE GOVERNANCE CODE In Austria, the Corporate Governance Code (ÖCGK), drawn up by the Working Group for Corporate Governance under the guidance of the government authorities responsible for the Austrian capital market, has been in force since 1 October 2002. Since then, it has been reviewed in light of national and international developments and amended where necessary. As a system of rules, the ÖCGK supplements Austrian stock and capital market legislation with recommendations and suggestions regarding good corporate management. The objective of the ÖCGK is the responsible management and control of enterprises for the purpose of sustainable, long-term value creation, with a high level of transparency for all stakeholders of the company. Its basis is provided by the provisions of Austrian company, stock exchange and capital markets legislation, the EU recommendations concerning the responsibilities of Supervisory Board members and the remuneration of directors, and the principles of the OECD guidelines for corporate governance. The rules of the ÖCGK are divided into three categories: L-Rules (legal requirement): rules based on mandatory statutory requirements C-Rules (comply or explain): rules from which any departure must be explained and justified, and R-Rules (recommendation): rules in the nature of recommendations, where non-compliance need neither be disclosed nor explained. The version of the ÖCGK currently in force can be downloaded from the Working Group’s website at www.corporate-governance.at.
    [Show full text]