Cucurbitacins Are Insect Steroid Hormone Antagonists Acting at The

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Cucurbitacins Are Insect Steroid Hormone Antagonists Acting at The Biochem. J. (1997) 327, 643–650 (Printed in Great Britain) 643 Cucurbitacins are insect steroid hormone antagonists acting at the ecdysteroid receptor ! Laurence DINAN*1, Pensri WHITING*, Jean-Pierre GIRAULT†, Rene LAFONT‡, Tarlochan S. DHADIALLA§, Dean E. CRESS§, Bruno MUGATs, Christophe ANTONIEWSKIs and Jean-Antoine LEPESANTs *Department of Biological Sciences, University of Exeter, Washington Singer Laboratories, Perry Road, Exeter, Devon EX4 4QG, U.K., †Universite! Rene! Descartes, Laboratoire de Chimie et Biochimie Pharmacologiques et Toxicologiques, CNRS-URA 400, 45 rue des Saints-Pe' res, 75270 Paris cedex 06, France, ‡E; cole Normale Supe! rieure, De! partement de Biologie, Laboratoire de Biochimie, CNRS-EP 119, 46 rue d’Ulm, 75230 Paris cedex 05, France, §Rohm & Haas Co., Research Laboratories, 727 Norristown Road, P.O. Box 904, Spring House, PA 19477-0904, U.S.A., and sInstitut Jacques Monod, 2 Place Jussieu, F-75251 Paris cedex 05, France Two triterpenoids, cucurbitacins B and D, have been isolated B (cucB) prevents stimulation by 20E of an ecdysteroid-re- from seeds of Iberis umbellata (Cruciferae) and shown to be sponsive reporter gene in a transfection assay. CucB also prevents responsible for the antagonistic activity of a methanolic extract the formation of the Drosophila ecdysteroid receptor}Ultra- of this species in preventing the 20-hydroxyecdysone (20E)- spiracle}20E complex with the hsp27 ecdysteroid response induced morphological changes in the Drosophila melanogaster element as demonstrated by gel-shift assay. This is therefore the BII permanent cell line. With a 20E concentration of 50 nM, first definitive evidence for the existence of antagonists acting at cucurbitacins B and D give 50% responses at 1.5 and 10 µM the ecdysteroid receptor. Preliminary structure}activity studies #$ respectively. Both cucurbitacins are able to displace specifically indicate the importance of the ∆ -22-oxo functional grouping in bound radiolabelled 25-deoxy-20-hydroxyecdysone (ponasterone the side chain for antagonistic activity. Hexanorcucurbitacin D, A) from a cell-free preparation of the BII cells containing which lacks carbon atoms C-22 to C-27, is found to be a weak ecdysteroid receptors. The Kd values for cucurbitacins B and D agonist rather than an antagonist. Moreover, the side chain (5 and 50 µM respectively) are similar to the concentrations analogue 5-methylhex-3-en-2-one possesses weak antagonistic required to antagonize 20E activity with whole cells. Cucurbitacin activity. INTRODUCTION being developed as a commercial insecticide. To identify ecdy- Insect development is strictly regulated by the interplay between steroid antagonists among natural products we have initiated a a number of chemically different classes of hormone. The steroid screening programme with a sensitive, robust and convenient hormones of insects are the ecdysteroids, which are involved at microplate-based bioassay on an ecdysteroid-responsive cell line each stage of the insect’s life cycle and in the regulation of many [14,15]. This has identified several plant extracts with potent developmental, biochemical and physiological processes (re- ecdysteroid antagonist activities. Here we report the bioassay- viewed in [1]). Thus, in the search for new agents to control insect guided purification and identification of the active principles pest species, interference with ecdysteroid action is an attractive, from one of these extracts and the initial characterization of their but as yet little exploited, target. Not only are the hormonal molecular mode of action. Cucurbitacins are thus demonstrated actions of ecdysteroids specific to invertebrates, but the ecdy- to be the first definitive insect steroid hormone antagonists acting steroids are chemically distinct from vertebrate steroid hormones, at the level of the ecdysteroid receptor. suggesting that agents specifically disrupting ecdysteroid meta- bolism}mode of action should not affect vertebrate steroid hormone systems. MATERIALS AND METHODS Hormone agonists and antagonists are powerful tools for the molecular dissection of hormone action. Steroid hormone Chromatography antagonists have been identified for the oestrogens, androgens, General HPLC conditions have been described previously [16]. progestogens and glucocorticoids, and compounds such as tam- Analytical and semi-preparative C"), silica and DIOL columns oxifen have found medical application [2,3]. No unequivocal were purchased from Jones Chromatography. Solid-phase ex- antagonists have yet been identified in vertebrate systems for traction (SPE) columns (C") and silica SEP-PAK) were obtained vitamin D [4] or in invertebrates for ecdysteroids. The recent from the Waters Division of Millipore. Chromatography sep- rapid advances in the characterization of the ecdysteroid recep- aration conditions are described below as appropriate. tors from Drosophila melanogaster [5,6] and other insect species [7–10] have made insect systems excellent general models for the study of steroid hormone action [11]. Steroidal ecdysteroid Bioassay agonists exist in the form of phytoecdysteroids – more than 150 analogues – which have been isolated from various species of The microplate-based bioassay for ecdysteroid agonists and plant [12]. The first non-steroidal ecdysteroid agonists antagonists based on the ecdysteroid-specific response of the have been identified [13] and at least one of these (RH5992) is Drosophila melanogaster BII cell line was performed as described Abbreviations used: cucB, cucurbitacin B; cucD, cucurbitacin D; EcRE, ecdysteroid response element; 20E, 20-hydroxyecdysone; RP, reverse-phase; SPE, solid-phase extraction. 1 To whom correspondence should be addressed. 644 L. Dinan and others previously [15]. The concentration of 20-hydroxyecdysone (20E) Molecular modelling used in the antagonist assay was 50 nM. Molecular modelling was performed with Alchemy III software from Tripos (St. Louis, MO, U.S.A.). Energy minimization was Plant material performed in acuo without electrostatic charges. Superimpo- Seeds for screening purposes were purchased from commercial sition of 20E and cucurbitacin D (cucD) was performed with the seed companies, mainly Chiltern Seeds, Ulverston, Cumbria, fitting procedure of the software and by fitting the atoms of the U.K. Seeds of Iberis umbellata (candytuft) were donated by C- and D-rings of the two compounds. Suttons Seeds (Torquay, Devon, U.K.). Plants of I. umbellata were grown in a domestic garden and harvested when mature Mode of action of the antagonists (with flowers and fruits). Cell-free receptor binding assay Reference cucurbitacins BII cells were homogenized by sonication and centrifuged (16000 g for 20 min at 4 mC) as described previously [18]. Aliquots Cucurbitacins E and I were purchased from Extrasynthese SA, (100 µl) of the supernatant were incubated in a final volume of $ Genay, France. Other cucurbitacins were gifts from Professor H. 200 µl with [ H]ponasterone A (180 Ci}mmol; 0.2 nM final Achenbach (Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Uni- concentration) in the presence of known concentrations of A1 or versity of Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany) and Professor T. A2 (see below) or a 250-fold excess of unlabelled ponasterone A. Konoshima (Kyoto Pharmaceutical University, Kyoto, Japan). Kd values were calculated from IC&! values with the LIGAND program [19]. Alkenyl ketones Hept-3-en-2-one, hex-4-en-3-one, 5-methylhex-3-en-2-one and Gel-retardation assays 6-methylhepta-3,5-dien-2-one were purchased from Aldrich Gel-shift assays were performed as described by Antoniewski et (Gillingham, Dorset, U.K.) or Lancaster Synthesis (Morecambe, al. [20] with D. melanogaster BII cell nuclear extract, except that Lancs., U.K.). incubations and gel separations were performed at 20 mC. The probe was a 27-mer corresponding to the hsp27 ecdysteroid response element (EcRE) sequence [20,21] labelled at the 5« end Extraction and analysis of plant material $# with P. Gels were vacuum-dried and then substances were Seed samples were ground in a pestle and mortar; plant material detected and quantified by means of a PhosphorImager. was freeze-dried for 4 days. Samples (approx. 25 mg) were extracted three-times with methanol (1 ml) at 55 mC. The pooled extracts were mixed with 1.3 ml of water and 2 ml of hexane. The Transfection assays hexane phase (containing non-polar lipids and}or pigments) was D. melanogaster S2 cells were transfected in the presence discarded. Portions of each aqueous methanol phase were of DOTAP ²N-[1-(2,3-dioleoyloxy)propyl]-N,N,N-trimethyl- analysed for their agonist and antagonist activities by means of ammonium methylsulphate´ with a construct consisting of ten bioassay, and for the presence of ecdysteroids by radioimmuno- copies of the hsp27 EcRE coupled to the Fbp1 minimal promoter assay [17]. The antisera do not cross-react with cucurbitacins B (bp ®69 to ­ 80) and the lacZ reporter gene [22]. After 24 h the and D (T. V. Savchenko and L. Dinan, unpublished work). cells were exposed to 20E and}or cucurbitacins; after a further Preliminary chromatographic characterization of the antagonist 24 h the cells were extracted and the β-galactosidase activity was activities was obtained by monitoring normal-phase (silica, 1 g) measured by the method of [22]. and reverse-phase (RP) (C"), 0.5 g) SPE and HPLC separations with the bioassay in antagonist mode. Coupled transcription and translation of Drosophila ecdysteroid receptor (DmEcR) and Ultraspiracle (DmUSP) proteins Isolation of antagonists from candytuft
Recommended publications
  • The Vascular Plants of Massachusetts
    The Vascular Plants of Massachusetts: The Vascular Plants of Massachusetts: A County Checklist • First Revision Melissa Dow Cullina, Bryan Connolly, Bruce Sorrie and Paul Somers Somers Bruce Sorrie and Paul Connolly, Bryan Cullina, Melissa Dow Revision • First A County Checklist Plants of Massachusetts: Vascular The A County Checklist First Revision Melissa Dow Cullina, Bryan Connolly, Bruce Sorrie and Paul Somers Massachusetts Natural Heritage & Endangered Species Program Massachusetts Division of Fisheries and Wildlife Natural Heritage & Endangered Species Program The Natural Heritage & Endangered Species Program (NHESP), part of the Massachusetts Division of Fisheries and Wildlife, is one of the programs forming the Natural Heritage network. NHESP is responsible for the conservation and protection of hundreds of species that are not hunted, fished, trapped, or commercially harvested in the state. The Program's highest priority is protecting the 176 species of vertebrate and invertebrate animals and 259 species of native plants that are officially listed as Endangered, Threatened or of Special Concern in Massachusetts. Endangered species conservation in Massachusetts depends on you! A major source of funding for the protection of rare and endangered species comes from voluntary donations on state income tax forms. Contributions go to the Natural Heritage & Endangered Species Fund, which provides a portion of the operating budget for the Natural Heritage & Endangered Species Program. NHESP protects rare species through biological inventory,
    [Show full text]
  • Conserving Europe's Threatened Plants
    Conserving Europe’s threatened plants Progress towards Target 8 of the Global Strategy for Plant Conservation Conserving Europe’s threatened plants Progress towards Target 8 of the Global Strategy for Plant Conservation By Suzanne Sharrock and Meirion Jones May 2009 Recommended citation: Sharrock, S. and Jones, M., 2009. Conserving Europe’s threatened plants: Progress towards Target 8 of the Global Strategy for Plant Conservation Botanic Gardens Conservation International, Richmond, UK ISBN 978-1-905164-30-1 Published by Botanic Gardens Conservation International Descanso House, 199 Kew Road, Richmond, Surrey, TW9 3BW, UK Design: John Morgan, [email protected] Acknowledgements The work of establishing a consolidated list of threatened Photo credits European plants was first initiated by Hugh Synge who developed the original database on which this report is based. All images are credited to BGCI with the exceptions of: We are most grateful to Hugh for providing this database to page 5, Nikos Krigas; page 8. Christophe Libert; page 10, BGCI and advising on further development of the list. The Pawel Kos; page 12 (upper), Nikos Krigas; page 14: James exacting task of inputting data from national Red Lists was Hitchmough; page 16 (lower), Jože Bavcon; page 17 (upper), carried out by Chris Cockel and without his dedicated work, the Nkos Krigas; page 20 (upper), Anca Sarbu; page 21, Nikos list would not have been completed. Thank you for your efforts Krigas; page 22 (upper) Simon Williams; page 22 (lower), RBG Chris. We are grateful to all the members of the European Kew; page 23 (upper), Jo Packet; page 23 (lower), Sandrine Botanic Gardens Consortium and other colleagues from Europe Godefroid; page 24 (upper) Jože Bavcon; page 24 (lower), Frank who provided essential advice, guidance and supplementary Scumacher; page 25 (upper) Michael Burkart; page 25, (lower) information on the species included in the database.
    [Show full text]
  • Supplementary Information an Independent Evolutionary Origin For
    Supplementary information An independent evolutionary origin for insect deterrent cucurbitacins in Iberis amara Lemeng Dong1,6*, Aldo Almeida1, Jacob Pollier2,3, Bekzod Khakimov4, Jean-Etienne Bassard1, Karel Miettinen2,3, Dan Stærk5, Rahimi, Mehran6, Carl Erik Olsen1, Mohammed Saddik Motawia1, Alain Goossens2,3, and Søren Bak1* 1Department of Plant and Environmental Science, University of Copenhagen, Thorvaldsensvej 40, DK-1871 Frederiksberg C, Denmark. 2Ghent University, Department of Plant Biotechnology and Bioinformatics, Technologiepark 71, 9052 Ghent, Belgium. 3VIB Center for Plant Systems Biology, Technologiepark 71, 9052 Ghent, Belgium. 4Department of Food Science, University of Copenhagen, Rolighedsvej 26, DK-1958 Frederiksberg C, Denmark. 5Department of Drug Design and Pharmacology, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Universitetsparken 2, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark. 6Plant Hormone Biology group, Swammerdam Institute for Life Science, University of Amsterdam, Science Park 904, 1098 XH Amsterdam, the Netherlands *[email protected] [email protected] This PDF file includes: Supplementary Figure 1 to Figure 11, Supplementary Table 1 to Table 6, Supplementary NMR data (general experimental procedures, data interpretation of compound 1-5, supplementary Figure 12 to Figure 19, Supplementary Table 7 to Table 11), and References A Intensity one-week old 1.0 x108 roots 0.5 0.0 1.5 aerial 1.0 0.5 0.0 8.0 standard mix 4.0 D I B E 0.0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Time [min] B Intensity four-week old 1.5 x108 roots 1.0 0.5 0.0 0.8 aerial 0.4 0.0 8.0 standard mix D I B E 4.0 0.0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Time [min] Supplementary Figure 1 Cucurbitacin E, I, and B accumulate in both roots and aerial parts of I.
    [Show full text]
  • Flora Mediterranea 26
    FLORA MEDITERRANEA 26 Published under the auspices of OPTIMA by the Herbarium Mediterraneum Panormitanum Palermo – 2016 FLORA MEDITERRANEA Edited on behalf of the International Foundation pro Herbario Mediterraneo by Francesco M. Raimondo, Werner Greuter & Gianniantonio Domina Editorial board G. Domina (Palermo), F. Garbari (Pisa), W. Greuter (Berlin), S. L. Jury (Reading), G. Kamari (Patras), P. Mazzola (Palermo), S. Pignatti (Roma), F. M. Raimondo (Palermo), C. Salmeri (Palermo), B. Valdés (Sevilla), G. Venturella (Palermo). Advisory Committee P. V. Arrigoni (Firenze) P. Küpfer (Neuchatel) H. M. Burdet (Genève) J. Mathez (Montpellier) A. Carapezza (Palermo) G. Moggi (Firenze) C. D. K. Cook (Zurich) E. Nardi (Firenze) R. Courtecuisse (Lille) P. L. Nimis (Trieste) V. Demoulin (Liège) D. Phitos (Patras) F. Ehrendorfer (Wien) L. Poldini (Trieste) M. Erben (Munchen) R. M. Ros Espín (Murcia) G. Giaccone (Catania) A. Strid (Copenhagen) V. H. Heywood (Reading) B. Zimmer (Berlin) Editorial Office Editorial assistance: A. M. Mannino Editorial secretariat: V. Spadaro & P. Campisi Layout & Tecnical editing: E. Di Gristina & F. La Sorte Design: V. Magro & L. C. Raimondo Redazione di "Flora Mediterranea" Herbarium Mediterraneum Panormitanum, Università di Palermo Via Lincoln, 2 I-90133 Palermo, Italy [email protected] Printed by Luxograph s.r.l., Piazza Bartolomeo da Messina, 2/E - Palermo Registration at Tribunale di Palermo, no. 27 of 12 July 1991 ISSN: 1120-4052 printed, 2240-4538 online DOI: 10.7320/FlMedit26.001 Copyright © by International Foundation pro Herbario Mediterraneo, Palermo Contents V. Hugonnot & L. Chavoutier: A modern record of one of the rarest European mosses, Ptychomitrium incurvum (Ptychomitriaceae), in Eastern Pyrenees, France . 5 P. Chène, M.
    [Show full text]
  • Jill C. Preston 2,4 , Lena C. Hileman 2 , and Pilar Cubas 3
    American Journal of Botany 98(3): 397–403. 2011. R EDUCE, REUSE, AND RECYCLE: 1 D EVELOPMENTAL EVOLUTION OF TRAIT DIVERSIFICATION 3 Jill C. Preston 2,4 , Lena C. Hileman 2 , and Pilar Cubas 2 Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Kansas, 1200 Sunnyside Avenue, Lawrence, Kansas 66045 USA; and 3 Departamento de Gen é tica Molecular de Plantas, Centro Nacional de Biotecnolog í a/CSIC, Campus Universidad Aut ó noma de Madrid 28049 Madrid, Spain A major focus of evolutionary developmental (evo-devo) studies is to determine the genetic basis of variation in organismal form and function, both of which are fundamental to biological diversifi cation. Pioneering work on metazoan and fl owering plant systems has revealed conserved sets of genes that underlie the bauplan of organisms derived from a common ancestor. However, the extent to which variation in the developmental genetic toolkit mirrors variation at the phenotypic level is an active area of re- search. Here we explore evidence from the angiosperm evo-devo literature supporting the frugal use of genes and genetic pathways in the evolution of developmental patterning. In particular, these examples highlight the importance of genetic pleiotropy in dif- ferent developmental modules, thus reducing the number of genes required in growth and development, and the reuse of particular genes in the parallel evolution of ecologically important traits. Key words: CRABS CLAW ; CYCLOIDEA ; evo-devo; FRUITFULL ; independent recruitment; KNOX1; parallelism; trait evolution. Organisms show remarkable variation in phenotypic form in metazoan animals and nonfl owering plants (e.g., Rensing and function, both of which are fundamental to biological di- et al., 2008 ; Sakakibara et al., 2008 ; reviewed in Ca ñ estro versifi cation.
    [Show full text]
  • Fragrant Annuals Fragrant Annuals
    TheThe AmericanAmerican GARDENERGARDENER® TheThe MagazineMagazine ofof thethe AAmericanmerican HorticulturalHorticultural SocietySociety JanuaryJanuary // FebruaryFebruary 20112011 New Plants for 2011 Unusual Trees with Garden Potential The AHS’s River Farm: A Center of Horticulture Fragrant Annuals Legacies assume many forms hether making estate plans, considering W year-end giving, honoring a loved one or planting a tree, the legacies of tomorrow are created today. Please remember the American Horticultural Society when making your estate and charitable giving plans. Together we can leave a legacy of a greener, healthier, more beautiful America. For more information on including the AHS in your estate planning and charitable giving, or to make a gift to honor or remember a loved one, please contact Courtney Capstack at (703) 768-5700 ext. 127. Making America a Nation of Gardeners, a Land of Gardens contents Volume 90, Number 1 . January / February 2011 FEATURES DEPARTMENTS 5 NOTES FROM RIVER FARM 6 MEMBERS’ FORUM 8 NEWS FROM THE AHS 2011 Seed Exchange catalog online for AHS members, new AHS Travel Study Program destinations, AHS forms partnership with Northeast garden symposium, registration open for 10th annual America in Bloom Contest, 2011 EPCOT International Flower & Garden Festival, Colonial Williamsburg Garden Symposium, TGOA-MGCA garden photography competition opens. 40 GARDEN SOLUTIONS Plant expert Scott Aker offers a holistic approach to solving common problems. 42 HOMEGROWN HARVEST page 28 Easy-to-grow parsley. 44 GARDENER’S NOTEBOOK Enlightened ways to NEW PLANTS FOR 2011 BY JANE BERGER 12 control powdery mildew, Edible, compact, upright, and colorful are the themes of this beating bugs with plant year’s new plant introductions.
    [Show full text]
  • Trends in Flower Symmetry Evolution Revealed Through Phylogenetic and Developmental Genetic Advances
    Trends in flower symmetry evolution revealed through phylogenetic and developmental genetic advances Lena C. Hileman rstb.royalsocietypublishing.org Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Kansas, 1200 Sunnyside Avenue, Lawrence, KS 66045, USA A striking aspect of flowering plant (angiosperm) diversity is variation in flower symmetry. From an ancestral form of radial symmetry (polysymmetry, actinomorphy), multiple evolutionary transitions have contributed to instan- Review ces of non-radial forms, including bilateral symmetry (monosymmetry, zygomorphy) and asymmetry. Advances in flowering plant molecular Cite this article: Hileman LC. 2014 Trends in phylogenetic research and studies of character evolution as well as detailed flower symmetry evolution revealed through flower developmental genetic studies in a few model species (e.g. Antirrhinum phylogenetic and developmental genetic majus, snapdragon) have provided a foundation for deep insights into flower symmetry evolution. From phylogenetic studies, we have a better under- advances. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 369: 20130348. standing of where during flowering plant diversification transitions from http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2013.0348 radial to bilateral flower symmetry (and back to radial symmetry) have occurred. From developmental studies, we know that a genetic programme One contribution of 14 to a Theme Issue largely dependent on the functional action of the CYCLOIDEA gene is necess- ‘Contemporary and future studies in plant ary for differentiation along the snapdragon dorsoventral flower axis. Bringing these two lines of inquiry together has provided surprising insights into both speciation, morphological/floral evolution the parallel recruitment of a CYC-dependent developmental programme and polyploidy: honouring the scientific during independent transitions to bilateral flower symmetry, and the modifi- contributions of Leslie D.
    [Show full text]
  • Citation: Badenes-Pérez, F. R. 2019. Trap Crops and Insectary Plants in the Order 2 Brassicales
    1 Citation: Badenes-Pérez, F. R. 2019. Trap Crops and Insectary Plants in the Order 2 Brassicales. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 112: 318-329. 3 https://doi.org/10.1093/aesa/say043 4 5 6 Trap Crops and Insectary Plants in the Order Brassicales 7 Francisco Rubén Badenes-Perez 8 Instituto de Ciencias Agrarias, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, 28006 9 Madrid, Spain 10 E-mail: [email protected] 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 ABSTRACT This paper reviews the most important cases of trap crops and insectary 26 plants in the order Brassicales. Most trap crops in the order Brassicales target insects that 27 are specialist in plants belonging to this order, such as the diamondback moth, Plutella 28 xylostella L. (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae), the pollen beetle, Meligethes aeneus Fabricius 29 (Coleoptera: Nitidulidae), and flea beetles inthe genera Phyllotreta Psylliodes 30 (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). In most cases, the mode of action of these trap crops is the 31 preferential attraction of the insect pest for the trap crop located next to the main crop. 32 With one exception, these trap crops in the order Brassicales have been used with 33 brassicaceous crops. Insectary plants in the order Brassicales attract a wide variety of 34 natural enemies, but most studies focus on their effect on aphidofagous hoverflies and 35 parasitoids. The parasitoids benefiting from insectary plants in the order Brassicales 36 target insects pests ranging from specialists, such as P. xylostella, to highly polyfagous, 37 such as the stink bugs Euschistus conspersus Uhler and Thyanta pallidovirens Stål 38 (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae).
    [Show full text]
  • Reports Based on the Work Performed by the Nordic Project Group on Inherent Natural Toxicants in Food Plants and Mushrooms Has Been Published
    Cucurbitacins in plant food Jørn Gry, Inge Søborg and Hans Christer Andersson TemaNord 2006:556 Cucurbitacins in plant food TemaNord 2006:556 © Nordic Council of Ministers, Copenhagen 2006 ISBN 92-893-1381-1 Print: Ekspressen Tryk & Kopicenter Copies: 200 Printed on environmentally friendly paper This publication can be ordered on www.norden.org/order. Other Nordic publications are available at www.norden.org/publications Printed in Denmark Nordic Council of Ministers Nordic Council Store Strandstræde 18 Store Strandstræde 18 DK-1255 Copenhagen K DK-1255 Copenhagen K Phone (+45) 3396 0200 Phone (+45) 3396 0400 Fax (+45) 3396 0202 Fax (+45) 3311 1870 www.norden.org The Nordic Food Policy Co-operation The Nordic Committee of Senior Officials for Food Issues is concerned with basic Food Policy issues relating to food and nutrition, food toxicology and food microbiology, risk evaluation, food control and food legislation. The co-operation aims at protection of the health of the consumer, common utilisation of professional and administrative resources and at Nordic and international developments in this field. Nordic co-operation Nordic co-operation, one of the oldest and most wide-ranging regional partnerships in the world, involves Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway, Sweden, the Faroe Islands, Greenland and Åland. Co- operation reinforces the sense of Nordic community while respecting national differences and simi- larities, makes it possible to uphold Nordic interests in the world at large and promotes positive relations between neighbouring peoples. Co-operation was formalised in 1952 when the Nordic Council was set up as a forum for parlia- mentarians and governments. The Helsinki Treaty of 1962 has formed the framework for Nordic partnership ever since.
    [Show full text]
  • Cucurbit Genetics Cooperative (CGC) Was Organized in 1977 to Develop and Advance the Genetics of Economically Important Cucurbits
    CGC Coordinating Committee Chair: Timothy J Ng College Park, MD, USA Cucurbit Cucumber: Jack E. Staub Madison, WI, USA Melon: David W. Wolff Lehigh Acres, FL, USA Watermelon: Dennis T. Ray Genetics Tucson, AZ, USA Cucurbita spp.: Linda Wessel-Beaver Mayagúez, PR, USA Other genera: Mark G. Hutton Cooperative Monmouth, ME, USA CGC Gene List Committee Cucumber: Todd C. Wehner Raleigh, NC, USA Melon: Michel Pitrat Montfavet, FRANCE Watermelon: Stephen R. King College Station, TX Cucurbita spp.: R.W. Robinson Geneva, NY, USA Rebecca Brown 27 Corvallis, Oregon Harry S. Paris Ramat Yishay, ISRAEL Other genera: R.W. Robinson Geneva, NY, USA CGC Gene Curators Cucumber: Todd C. Wehner Raleigh, NC, USA Jack E. Staub 2004 Madison, WI, USA Melon: Michel Pitrat Montfavet, FRANCE James D. McCreight ISSN 1064-5594 Salinas, CA, USA Watermelon: Todd C. Wehner Raleigh, NC, USA 2118 Plant Sciences Building Xingping Zhang College Park, Maryland Woodland, CA, USA Cucurbita spp.: R.W. Robinson 20742-4452 USA Geneva, NY, USA Other genera: R.W. Robinson Tel: (301) 405-4345 Geneva, NY, USA Deena Decker-Walters Fax: (301) 314-9308 Miami, FL, USA Internet: [email protected] http://www.umresearch.umd.edu/cgc/ The Cucurbit Genetics Cooperative (CGC) was organized in 1977 to develop and advance the genetics of economically important cucurbits. Membership to CGC is voluntary and open to individuals who have an interest in cucurbit genetics and breeding. CGC membership is on a biennial basis. For more information on CGC and its membership rates, visit our website (http://www.umresearch.umd.edu/cgc/) or contact Tim Ng at (301) 405-4345 or [email protected].
    [Show full text]
  • ANATOMICAL CHARACTERISTICS and ECOLOGICAL TRENDS in the XYLEM and PHLOEM of BRASSICACEAE and RESEDACAE Fritz Hans Schweingruber
    IAWA Journal, Vol. 27 (4), 2006: 419–442 ANATOMICAL CHARACTERISTICS AND ECOLOGICAL TRENDS IN THE XYLEM AND PHLOEM OF BRASSICACEAE AND RESEDACAE Fritz Hans Schweingruber Swiss Federal Research Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape, CH-8903 Birmensdorf, Switzerland (= corresponding address) SUMMARY The xylem and phloem of Brassicaceae (116 and 82 species respectively) and the xylem of Resedaceae (8 species) from arid, subtropical and tem- perate regions in Western Europe and North America is described and ana- lysed, compared with taxonomic classifications, and assigned to their ecological range. The xylem of different life forms (herbaceous plants, dwarf shrubs and shrubs) of both families consists of libriform fibres and short, narrow vessels that are 20–50 μm in diameter and have alter- nate vestured pits and simple perforations. The axial parenchyma is para- tracheal and, in most species, the ray cells are exclusively upright or square. Very few Brassicaceae species have helical thickening on the vessel walls, and crystals in fibres. The xylem anatomy of Resedaceae is in general very similar to that of the Brassicaceae. Vestured pits occur only in one species of Resedaceae. Brassicaceae show clear ecological trends: annual rings are usually dis- tinct, except in arid and subtropical lowland zones; semi-ring-porosity decreases from the alpine zone to the hill zone at lower altitude. Plants with numerous narrow vessels are mainly found in the alpine zone. Xylem without rays is mainly present in plants growing in the Alps, both at low and high altitudes. The reaction wood of the Brassicaceae consists primarily of thick-walled fibres, whereas that of the Resedaceae contains gelatinous fibres.
    [Show full text]
  • Cucurbit Genetics Cooperative (CGC) Was Organized in 1977 to Develop and Advance the Genetics of Economically Important Cucurbits
    CGC Coordinating Committee Chair: Timothy J Ng College Park, MD, USA Cucurbit Cucumber: Jack E. Staub Madison, WI, USA Melon: David W. Wolff Lehigh Acres, FL, USA Watermelon: Dennis T. Ray Genetics Tucson, AZ, USA Cucurbita spp.: Linda Wessel-Beaver Mayagúez, PR, USA Other genera: Mark G. Hutton Cooperative Monmouth, ME, USA CGC Gene List Committee Cucumber: Todd C. Wehner Raleigh, NC, USA Melon: Michel Pitrat Montfavet, FRANCE Watermelon: Bill B. Rhodes Clemson, SC, USA Fenny Dane Auburn, AL, USA Cucurbita spp.: R.W. Robinson 26 Geneva, NY, USA Rebecca Brown Corvallis, Oregon Harry S. Paris Ramat Yishay, ISRAEL Other genera: R.W. Robinson Geneva, NY, USA CGC Gene Curators Cucumber: Todd C. Wehner 2003 Raleigh, NC, USA Jack E. Staub Madison, WI, USA ISSN 1064-5594 Melon: Michel Pitrat Montfavet, FRANCE James D. McCreight 2118 Plant Sciences Building Salinas, CA, USA Watermelon: Todd C. Wehner College Park, Maryland Raleigh, NC, USA Xingping Zhang 20742-4452 USA Woodland, CA, USA Cucurbita spp.: R.W. Robinson Tel: (301) 405-4345 Geneva, NY, USA Fax: (301) 314-9308 Other genera: R.W. Robinson Geneva, NY, USA Internet: [email protected] Deena Decker-Walters Miami, FL, USA http://www.umresearch.umd.edu/cgc/ The Cucurbit Genetics Cooperative (CGC) was organized in 1977 to develop and advance the genetics of economically important cucurbits. Membership to CGC is voluntary and open to individuals who have an interest in cucurbit genetics and breeding. CGC membership is on a biennial basis. For more information on CGC and its membership rates, visit our website (http://www.umresearch.umd.edu/cgc/) or contact Tim Ng at (301) 405-4345 or [email protected].
    [Show full text]