Vladimir Kravtsov Particles of the “Standard Model”

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Vladimir Kravtsov Particles of the “Standard Model” Vladimir Kravtsov Particles of the “Standard Model” Within the SM there are 3 different families of particles. Each lepton has a neutrino associated with it. Neutrinos are one of the fundamental particles and have only week interaction. Neutrino has a zero mass, a zero charge and a spin 1/2. Direct measurement of the neutrino mass by kinematical analysis of weak decays m 2.3eV e < m <170keV m <18.2MeV 3/24/2011 2 CSU The sources of neutrinos Natural sources 10 2 ĭȞ = 6 × 10 Ȟcm 3 ʌʆ = 330/cm EȞ ׽ 0.1–20 MeV Eʆ =0.0004 eV S-Kamiokande Relic Neutrinos Sun Neutrinos Solar Atmospheric Earth (Geo Ȟ) Supernovae BigBang Artificial sources Accelerators Reactors 3/24/2011 3 CSU A Brief History of the Neutrino 1914 The ȕ-decay energy conservation crisis. 1930 Pauli proposes a new neutral particle is emitted in ȕ-decay. 1932 Fermi names the new particle “neutrino” and introduces four-fermion interaction. 1956 The first observation of electron anti-neutrinos by Reines and Cowan. 1957 Bruno Pontecorvo proposes neutrino-antineutrino oscillations. 1962 Ziro Maki, Masami Nakagawa and Sakata introduce neutrino flavor mixing and flavor oscillations (MNSP matrix). 1962 The muon neutrino is observed at BNL. 1973 Discovery of neutral currents at CERN. 1998 Super-Kamiokande announced the evidence of atmospheric neutrino oscillations 2000 First direct evidence for the tau neutrino 3/24/2011 4 CSU Neutron ȕ decay Measured ɴ spectra Niels Bohr even suggested that perhaps energy were continuous instead of conservation did not hold inside the nucleus. discrete for 2-body decay “At the present stage of atomic theory, however, we may say that 1914 we have no argument, either empirical or theoretical, for upholding the energy principle in the case of ȕ-ray disintegrations”. - e 2 M nc E p + Ee Niels Bohr - n ĺSH 1930 Pauli proposed that a neutral particle shared the energy of beta decay with the emitted electron. Wolfgang Pauli - e 2 M nc = E p + Ee + E - Ȟ 1934 n ĺSH + Ȟ Fermi builds a new theory of to explain ɴ-decay based on the current-current interaction and named a new particle “neutrino”. Enrico Fermi 3/24/2011 5 CSU Discovery of Electron Neutrino (1956) The fist experimental detection came dŚĞŝŶǀĞƌƐĞɴĚĞĐĂLJƉƌŽĚƵĐĞƐƚǁŽƐŝŐŶĂůƐŝŶƚĂŶŬƐ from the high flux of neutrinos created ’s Scintillator + in Savannah River reactor. e + p n + e Ȟ Cd e+ n + + p e + e + Scintillator Prompt signal producing two 108 109 108 n+ Cd Cd Cd + 's 0.511 MeV Ȗ’s 110 5” PMTs Delayed signal from n capture on A few s later cadmium producing 9 MeV in Ȗ’s ʅ Positron scope 43 2 = (1.1 0.3) 10 cm Science 124 (1956) 103; Phys. Rev. 113 (1959) 273 The Nobel Prize in Physics 1995 Water + CdCl 2 was awarded to Frederick Reines Liquid3/24/2011 scintillator tanks Neutron6 scope "for the detection ofCSU the neutrino" Discovery of Muon Neutrino (1962) In 1962, Schwartz, Steinberger and Lederman built the very first Neutrino beam neutrino beam and presented evidence for the muon neutrino Main sources + + + + + K + Secondary sources + 0 + K + + + 0 + K + e + e + + e + e + 10-tonn spark chamber detector with Al plates The Nobel Prize 1998 was awarded to Leon Lederman, ȝ- Melvin Schwartz and Jack Steinberger "for the neutrino beam method and the demonstration of the doublet + n + p structure of the leptons through the discovery of the 3/24/2011 7 CSU 29 Ȟȝ interactions were registered muon neutrino " Discovery of Tau Neutrino (2000) 800 GeV protons from TeVatron (FNAL) on Tungsten target produce Ds mesons Decay of Ds meson DQGQH[WIJ lepton decay give ȞIJ Ds + l + l + , l = e, -13 IJIJ=2.9x10 ȞIJ + N + X DONUT e IJ 9 clean ȞIJ CC events were observed 3/24/2011 8 CSU Phys. Rev. D 78 (2008) 052002 Neutral currents: triumph of the electro-weak unification (1973) Weinberg and Salam develop a theory of electroweak interactions, but it requires a “neutral” weak current. CC NC The model introduces two types of weak interaction: Charged current (CC) and Neutral current (NC). + e + e Ȟȝ 1973 First example of + N + X NC CERN Ȟȝ - BEBC e Gargamelle Big European Gargamelle bubble chamber Bubble Chamber 3/24/2011 9 CSU filled with freon (CF3Br) Large neutrino calorimeter type detectors A large sampling calorimeters can measure large statistics CC and NC data Neutrino cross section is very low FNAL (700 GeV) CITF, HPWF, CCFR/NuTeV BNL (28 GeV) E-776, E-816 CERN (400 GeV) Aachen-Padova, CDHS, CHARM IHEP (70 GeV) IHEP-ITEP, IHEP-JINR 3/24/2011 10 CSU Large neutrino calorimeter type detectors goals 1. Cross section measurements + N + X - CC DIS + N + X - NC DIS + e + e - Ȟe-scattering + n + p - CC QE + p + p - NC Elastic + e + e - Inverse ȝ-decay 2. Nucleon structure functions measurements Bjorken scaling variables in the laboratory system - Energy transferred to nucleon - 4-momentum transfer In terms of the quark distribution functions 2 3. Measurement of sin șW SM parameters Paschos–Wolfenstein relation removes NuTeV - the effects of sea quark scattering and is much less sensitive to heavy quark production 4. Beam-dump experiments Search prompt neutrinos from charm particles production, Higgs, axion, heavy neutrino, … 3/24/2011 11 CSU 5. Neutrino oscillations CERN: CHARM and CHARM-II (1986-1991) experiments CHARM has a fine grained calorimeter with low Z target planes for good identification of electron from elastic Lje-scattering / Ee = 0.20 / Ee (GeV ) - electrons / E = 0.53/ E (GeV ) - hadrons / E = 0.09 + 0.15/ E (GeV ) - electrons Marble planes e e / E = 0.07 + 0.31/ E (GeV ) - hadrons Glass planes M=692 t 3/24/2011 12 CSU CERN: CDHS (1977-1983) experiment CDHS experiment was designed to study CC DIS and NC DIS neutrino interactions. Detector combined the functions of a muon spectrometer and hadron calorimeter. CERN + N + X + N + X DORTMUND Di-muon event HEIDELBERG / Ee = 0.23/ Ee (GeV ) - electrons SACLAY / E = 0.56 / E (GeV ) - hadrons WARSAW 19 magnetized iron modules M=1250 ton CSU FV=700 ton 13 FNAL: HPWF and NuTeV experiments Calorimeter Neutrino target: liquid scintillator Active detector: spark chamber and scintillator planes / E =10 12%, 10 150GeV Neutrino target: iron planes Active detector: drift chamber and scintillator planes M=700 ton 3/24/2011 14 CSU Neutrino Oscillations 2 At t=0 we have a flavor eigenstates and 1 e which are both mixtures of mass eigenstates and 1 2: e e (0) = cos 1 + sin 2 (0) = sin 1 + cos 2 1 According to Schrödinger equation the mass 2 iE1t iE2t eigenstates 1 and 2 with energy E1 and E2 e (t) = 1 e cos + 2 e sin evolve in time as plane waves: r m2 (t) = e iE1t sin + e iE2t cos For relativistic E = p2 + m2 = p + 1 2 neutrinos (E >> m) 2E 3 Assuming the same energy for both 2 2 Ȟ (t) e i(p+m1 /2E Ȟ )t Ȟ sinș Ȟ e-it m /E Ȟ sinș neutrino components we can write: ȝ = 1 + 2 4 The transition probability is, then, given by with m2 m2 m2 2 2 = 1 2 2 it m / 2E P( e ) =| e (t) | = sin cos (1 e ) Fraction of remaining neutrinos 2 2 5 If we measure ȴŵ in eV , L in km, and E in GeV we can write the above as: 2 2 2 1.27 m L P( e ) = sin 2 sin ( ) E 2 2 2 1.27 m L 3/24/2011P( ) =1 sin 2 sin ( ) 15 CSU E Atmospheric Neutrinos Neutrino Oscillations Discovery (1998) Neutrinos are produced by cosmic ray interactions in Earth’s atmosphere + + + + + , e + + e Expectation ( + ) 2 + , e + e + ( e + e ) SK was measured the number of Ȟȝ and Ȟe interactions as a function of zenith angle 41.4m x 39.3m (Diameter) MC simulation 50 ktons of pure water tank with уϭϭ͕ϬϬϬ20” PMTs Super-Kamiokande Particle identification is based on the pattern recognition of Cherenkov rings arising in water Muon - clean ring Electron – fuzzy ring 3/24/2011 16 CSU ( / e) Neutrino Oscillations Discovery (1998) R = Data ( / e)MC The registration efficiency for muons and electrons is very different R=1 if no oscillation Takeuchi, Neutrino 2010 At the Neutrino 98 conference, SK experiment presented new data on the deficit in muon neutrinos produced in the Earth's atmosphere. This deficit depends on the distance the neutrinos travel - an indication that neutrinos oscillate and have mass. R = 0.63 ± 0.03 ± 0.05 (sub-GeV) ȴm2=2.1x10-3 2 2 R = 0.65 ± 0.05 ± 0.08 (multi-GeV) sin ɽ13=0.0, sin ɽ13=0.5 June 5, 1998 The Nobel Prize in Physics 2002 was awarded to Masato Koshiba Ȟȝ–ȞIJ oscillation (best fit) “… for pioneering contribution to no oscillation astrophysics, in particular for the 3/24/2011 17 CSU detection of cosmic neutrinos" Member of the IHEP-JINR Neutrino Detector Collaboration from 1979 to 2000 Neutrino Detector Beam dump Experiment Search of the light Higgs bosons and Axion Limit on the charm production cross section Oscillation Experiment Total cross section measurement 3/24/2011 18 CSU IHEP-JINR Neutrino Detector Magnetic frame X DC Y DC LSC Al Plate Ȟ ȝ - spectrometer e/Ȗ - detector M=104 t 1.04 X0 Target calorimeter 0.35 LJabs LSC The 70 mkm Mylar container with liquid scintillator is inserted into 3mm Al box. Amplitude vs Coordinate MIP position resolution 3/24/2011 ѐX = 16 cm 19 CSU Neutrino Detector Calibration Test beam with low momentum spread The examples of events from pion, electron, Energy resolution vs momentum muon and neutrino interactions.
Recommended publications
  • Research Article an Appraisal of Muon Neutrino Disappearance at Short Baseline
    Hindawi Publishing Corporation Advances in High Energy Physics Volume 2013, Article ID 948626, 11 pages http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/948626 Research Article An Appraisal of Muon Neutrino Disappearance at Short Baseline L. Stanco,1 S. Dusini,1 A. Longhin,2 A. Bertolin,1 and M. Laveder3 1 INFN-Padova, Via Marzolo 8, 35131 Padova, Italy 2 Laboratori Nazionali di Frascati, INFN, Via E. Fermi 40, 00044 Frascati, Italy 3 Padova University and INFN-Padova, Via Marzolo 8, 35131 Padova, Italy Correspondence should be addressed to L. Stanco; [email protected] Received 20 June 2013; Revised 12 September 2013; Accepted 6 October 2013 Academic Editor: Kate Scholberg Copyright © 2013 L. Stanco et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Neutrino physics is nowadays receiving more and more attention as a possible source of information for the long-standing problem of new physics beyond the Standard Model. The recent measurement of the third mixing angle 13 in the standard mixing oscillation scenario encourages us to pursue the still missing results on leptonic CP violation and absolute neutrino masses. However, several puzzling measurements exist which deserve an exhaustive evaluation. Wewill illustrate the present status of the muon disappearance measurements at small / and the current CERN project to revitalize the neutrino field in Europe with emphasis on the search for sterile neutrinos. We will then illustrate the achievements that a double muon spectrometer can make with regard to discovery of new neutrino states, using a newly developed analysis.
    [Show full text]
  • Puzzling out Neutrino Mixing Through Golden Measurements
    Universidad Aut´onoma de Madrid Facultad de Ciencias Departamento de F´ısica Te´orica Puzzling out neutrino mixing through golden measurements Memoria de Tesis Doctoral realizada por Olga Mena Requejo, presentada ante el Departamento de F´ısica Te´orica de la Universidad Aut´onoma de Madrid para la obtenci´on del T´ıtulo de Doctora en Ciencias. Tesis Doctoral dirigida por la Catedr´atica M. Bel´en Gavela Legazpi, del Departamento de F´ısica Te´orica de la Universidad Aut´onoma de Madrid Madrid, Noviembre 2002. Agradecimientos “Erase´ una vez....” siempre me ha fascinado el principio de los cuentos infantiles (era el ´unico susurro que lograba escuchar segundos antes de conciliar el sue˜no), pero hoy intentar´emantenerme despierta..., una taza de caf´e, un bostezo,..., y seguro que yo tambi´en puedo contar un buen cuento, como mis abuelas...voy a intentarlo... “....una estudiante de F´ısicas, una entre los (400) j´ovenes estudiantes que se ma- triculan cada a˜no en la Universidad Aut´onoma∼O de Madrid, UAM para los amigos. Durante su tercer y cuarto a˜no de estudios, curs´ociertas asignaturas que realmente le impactaron, como la Mec´anica Cu´antica y la Mec´anica Te´orica. Un a˜no antes de li- cenciarse, acudi´oal despacho de la que hab´ıasido su profesora de Mec´anica Cu´antica, Bel´en Gavela, y le pregunt´oacerca de seguir investigando en F´ısica Te´orica con su ayuda. Bel´en la apoy´oy anim´o, la escuch´oy discuti´ocon ella cada tema que estudi- aba, le cedi´olibros, art´ıculos y trat´ode desnudar la F´ısica ante sus ojos.
    [Show full text]
  • The History of Neutrinos, 1930 − 1985
    The History of Neutrinos, 1930 − 1985. What have we Learned About Neutrinos? What have we Learned Using Neutrinos? J. Steinberger Prepared for “25th International Conference On Neutrino Physics and Astrophysics”, Kyoto (Japan), June 2012 1 2 3 4 The detector of the experiment of Conversi, Pancini and Piccioni, 1946, 5 which showed that the mesotron is not the Yukawa particle. Detector with 80 Geiger counters. The muon decay spectrum is continuous. My thesis experiment, under Fermi, which showed that the muon decays into two neutral particles, plus the electron. Fermi, myself and others, in 1954, at a summer school in Varenna, lake Como, a few months before Fermi’s untimely disappearance. 6 Demonstration of the Neutrino In 1956 Cowan and Reines detected antineutrinos from a nuclear reactor, reacting with protons in liquid scintillator which also contained cadmium, observing the positron as well as the scattering of the neutron on cadmium. 7 The Electron and Muon Neutrinos are Different. 1. G. Feinberg, 1958. 2. B. Pontecorvo, 1959. 3. M. Schwartz (T.D. Lee), 1959 4. Higher energy accelerators, Courant, Livingston and Snyder. Pontecorvo 8 9 A C B D Spark chamber and counter arrangement. A are triggering counters, Energy spectra of neutrinos B, C and D are anticoincidence counters from pion and kaon decays. 10 Event with penetrating muon and hadron shower 11 The group of the 2nd neutrino experiment in 1962: J.S., Goulianos, Gaillard, Mistry, Danby, technician whose name I have forgotten, Lederman and Schwartz. 12 Same group, 26 years later, at Nobel ceremony in Stockholm. 13 Discovery of partons, nucleon structure, scaling, in deep inelastic scattering of electrons on protons at SLAC in 1969.
    [Show full text]
  • New Physics with Neutrinos
    New Physics with Neutrinos Dissertation zur Erlangung des Grades \Doktor der Naturwissenschaften" am Fachbereich Physik, Mathematik und Informatik der Johannes Gutenberg-Universitat¨ in Mainz Mona Inge Dentler geboren in Munchen¨ Mainz, den 23.11.2018 Abstract Due to open problems in theory and unresolved anomalies in various oscilla- tion experiments, neutrino physics appears to be an excellent starting point in the quest for physics beyond the Standard Model (SM). The 3 + 1 framework featuring an additional, sterile neutrino mixing with the known neutrinos, is a minimalist extension of the SM which can account for oscillation phenomenology beyond the standard three flavor paradigm. However, two orthogonal arguments militate against this model. First, the increasing amount of ambiguous experimental results makes a con- sistent interpretation of the data in the 3 + 1 framework appear unlikely. In this regard, global fits provide a useful tool to investigate this objection. This thesis reports on the results of an up-to-date global fit to all relevant, available datasets, including the data corresponding to the reactor antineutrino anomaly (RAA), the gallium anomaly and the short baseline (SBL) anomaly. The reactor data as a special case can plausibly be explained by the hypothesis of a misprediction of the reactor antineutrino flux. Therefore, this hypothesis is tested against the 3 + 1 framework. Both hypotheses are found to be similarly likely, with a slight preference for the 3 + 1 framework, mainly driven by the data from DANSS and NEOS, which measure antineutrino spectra. However, a combination of both hypotheses fits the data best, with the hypothesis of a mere misprediction of the reactor flux rejected at 2:9σ.
    [Show full text]
  • Neutrino Physics
    Neutrino Physics Steve Boyd University of Warwick Course Map 1. History and properties of the neutrino, neutrino interactions, beams and detectors 2. Neutrino mass, direct mass measurements, double beta decay, flavour oscillations 3. Unravelling neutrino oscillations experimentally 4. Where we are and where we're going References K. Zuber, “Neutrino Physics”, IoP Publishing 2004 C. Giunti and C.W.Kim, “Fundamentals of Neutrino Physics and Astrophysics”, Oxford University Press, 2007. R. N. Mohaptara and P. B. Pal, “Massive Neutrinos in Physics and Astrophysics”, World Scientific (2nd Edition), 1998 H.V. Klapdor-Kleingrothaus & K. Zuber, “Particle Astrophysics”,IoP Publishing, 1997. Two Scientific American articles: “Detecting Massive Neutrinos”, E. Kearns, T. Kajita, Y. Totsuka, Scientific American, August 1999. “Solving the Solar Neutrino Problem”, A.B. McDonald, J.R. Klein, D.L. Wark, Scientific American, April 2003. Plus other Handouts Lecture 1 In which history is unravelled, desperation is answered, and the art of neutrino generation and detection explained Crisis It is 1914 – the new study of atomic physics is in trouble (Z+1,A) Spin 1/2 (Z,A) Spin 1/2 Spin 1/2 electron Spin ½ ≠ spin ½ + spin ½ E ≠ E +e Ra Bi “At the present stage of atomic “Desperate remedy.....” theory we have no arguments “I do not dare publish this idea....” for upholding the concept of “I admit my way out may look energy balance in the case of improbable....” b-ray disintegrations.” “Weigh it and pass sentence....” “You tell them. I'm off to a party” Detection of the Neutrino 1950 – Reines and Cowan set out to detect n 1951 1951 1951 I.
    [Show full text]
  • Download File
    A Deep-Learning-Based a` CCQE Selection for Searches Beyond the Standard Model with MicroBooNE Davio Cianci Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy under the Executive Committee of the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY 2021 © 2021 Davio Cianci All Rights Reserved Abstract A Deep-Learning-Based a` CCQE Selection for Searches Beyond the Standard Model with MicroBooNE Davio Cianci The anomalous Low Energy Excess (LEE) of electron neutrinos and antineutrinos in MiniBooNE has inspired both theories and entire experiments to probe the heart of its mystery. One such experiment is MicroBooNE. This dissertation presents an important facet of its LEE investigation: how a powerful systematic can be levied on this signal through parallel study of a highly correlated channel in muon neutrinos. This constraint serves to strengthen MicroBooNE’s ability to confirm or validate the cause of the LEE and will lay the groundwork for future oscillation experiments in Liquid Argon Time Projection Chamber (LArTPC) detector experiments like SBN and DUNE. In addition, this muon channel can be used to test oscillations directly, demonstrated through the world’s first a` disappearance search with LArTPC data. Table of Contents List of Figures .......................................... vii List of Tables .......................................... xxiv Acknowledgments ........................................xxvii Prologue ............................................. 1 I Introductions 2 Chapter 1: Neutrinos ...................................... 3 1.1 A Strange Position within the Standard Model . 3 1.1.1 The Standard Model of Particle Physics . 3 1.1.2 How Neutrinos Fit In . 5 1.2 Neutrino Oscillation Formalism . 6 1.3 Leading Experimental Constraints . 9 1.4 eV Scale Neutrino Masses .
    [Show full text]
  • (3 + 1 )-Spectrum of Neutrino Masses: a Chance for LSND?
    Nuclear Physics B 599 (2001) 3–29 www.elsevier.nl/locate/npe (3 + 1)-spectrum of neutrino masses: a chance for LSND? O.L.G. Peres a,b, A.Yu. Smirnov a,c a The Abdus Salam International Centre for Theoretical Physics, I-34100 Trieste, Italy b Instituto de Física Gleb Wataghin, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, UNICAMP 13083-970 Campinas, SP, Brazil c Institute for Nuclear Research of Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow 117312, Russia Received 20 November 2000; accepted 9 January 2001 Abstract If active to active neutrino transitions are dominant modes of the atmospheric (νµ → ντ )and the solar neutrino oscillations (νe → νµ/ντ ), as is indicated by recent data, the favoured scheme which accommodates the LSND result — the so-called (2 + 2)-scheme — should be discarded. We atm sun introduce the parameters ηs and ηs which quantify an involvement of the sterile component + atm + sun = in the solar and atmospheric neutrino oscillations. The (2 2)-scheme predicts ηs ηs 1 and the experimental proof of deviation from this equality will discriminate the scheme. In this connection the (3 + 1)-scheme is revisited in which the fourth (predominantly sterile) neutrino 2 ∼ 2 is isolated from a block of three flavour neutrinos by the mass gap mLSND (0.4–10) eV . Wefindthatinthe(3 + 1)-scheme the LSND result can be reconciled with existing bounds on νe-andνµ-disappearance at 95–99% C.L. The generic prediction of the scheme is the νe- and νµ-disappearance probabilities at the level of present experimental bounds. The possibility to strengthen the bound on νµ-disappearance in the KEK — front detector experiment is studied.
    [Show full text]
  • Dstau: Study of Tau Neutrino Production with 400 Gev Protons from the CERN-SPS
    Prepared for submission to JHEP DsTau: Study of tau neutrino production with 400 GeV protons from the CERN-SPS Shigeki Aoki,a Akitaka Ariga,b;1 Tomoko Ariga,b;c Sergey Dmitrievsky,d Elena Firu,e Dean Forshaw,b Tsutomu Fukuda,f Yuri Gornushkin,d Ali Murat Guler,g Maria Haiduc,e Koichi Kodama,h Masahiro Komatsu,f Muhtesem Akif Korkmaz,g Umut Kose,i Madalina Miloi,e Antonio Miucci,b Motoaki Miyanishi,f Mitsuhiro Nakamura,f Toshiyuki Nakano,f Alina Neagu,e Hiroki Rokujo,f Osamu Sato,f Elizaveta Sitnikova,d Yosuke Suzuki,f Tomoki Takao,f Svetlana Vasina,d Mykhailo Vladymyrov,b Thomas Weston,b Junya Yoshida,j Masahiro Yoshimoto.k The DsTau Collaboration aKobe University, Kobe, Japan bAlbert Einstein Center for Fundamental Physics, Laboratory for High Energy Physics, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland cKyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan dJoint Institute for Nuclear Research, Dubna, Russia eInstitute of Space Science, Bucharest, Romania f Nagoya University, Nagoya, Japan gMiddle East Technical University, Ankara, Turkey hAichi University of Education, Kariya, Japan iCERN, Geneva, Switzerland jAdvanced Science Research Center, Japan Atomic Energy Agency, Tokai, Japan kGifu University, Gifu, Japan E-mail: [email protected] Abstract: In the DsTau experiment at the CERN SPS, an independent and direct way to measure tau neutrino production following high energy proton interactions was proposed. As the main source of tau neutrinos is a decay of Ds mesons, produced in proton-nucleus arXiv:1906.03487v1 [hep-ex] 8 Jun 2019 interactions, the project aims at measuring a differential cross section of this reaction. The experimental method is based on a use of high resolution emulsion detectors for effective registration of events with short lived particle decays.
    [Show full text]
  • HARP Targets Pion Production Cross Section and Yield Measurements: Implications for Miniboone Neutrino Flux
    HARP targets pion production cross section and yield measurements: Implications for MiniBooNE neutrino flux A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate School of the University of Cincinnati in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of Physic of the College of Arts and Sciences July 2015 by Don Athula Abeyarathna Wickremasinghe M.Sc., University of Cincinnati, 2011 M.Sc., Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), 2008 B.Sc., University of Peradeniya, 2002 Committee Chair: Professor Randy A. Johnson © 2015 Don Athula A. Wickremasinghe All Rights Reserved HARP targets pion production cross section and yield measurements: Implications for MiniBooNE neutrino flux Don Athula Abeyarathna Wickremasinghe Abstract The prediction of the muon neutrino flux from a 71.0 cm long beryllium target for the MiniBooNE experiment is based on a measured pion production cross section which was taken from a short beryllium target (2.0 cm thick - 5% nuclear interaction length) in the Hadron Production (HARP) experiment at CERN. To verify the extrapolation to our longer target, HARP also measured the pion production from 20.0 cm and 40.0 cm beryllium targets. The measured production yields, d2N π± (p; θ)=dpdΩ, on targets of 50% and 100% nuclear interaction lengths in the kinematic rage of momentum from 0.75 GeV/c to 6.5 GeV/c and the range of angle from 30 mrad to 210 mrad are presented along with an update of the short target cross sections. The best fitted extended Sanford-Wang (SW) model parameterization for updated short beryllium target π+ production cross section is presented.
    [Show full text]
  • Pos(Nufact2017)067 Mass Range
    Neutrino cross-section measurement prospects with SBND PoS(NuFact2017)067 Nicola McConkey∗ for the SBND Collaboration University of Sheffield E-mail: [email protected] SBND (Short-Baseline Near Detector) is a 112ton liquid argon time projection chamber (LArTPC) neutrino detector under construction in the Fermilab Booster Neutrino Beam. Together with MicroBooNE and ICARUS-T600 detectors, SBND will search for short baseline neutrino oscillations in the 1eV2 mass range. SBND will also perform detailed studies of the physics of neutrino-argon interactions, thanks to a data sample of millions of electron and muon neutrino interactions. Finally SBND plays an important role in the on-going R&D effort to develop the LArTPC technology, testing several technologies that can be used in a future kiloton-scale neu- trino detectors for a long-baseline experiment. We will discuss the detector design, its current status, and the physics program, with a particular focus on the neutrino cross-section measure- ment prospects. The 19th International Workshop on Neutrinos from Accelerators-NUFACT2017 25-30 September, 2017 Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden ∗Speaker. c Copyright owned by the author(s) under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). https://pos.sissa.it/ Neutrino cross-section measurement prospects with SBND Nicola McConkey Table 1: Parameters of the three SBN detectors. Detector Baseline (m) Active LAr mass (tonnes) SBND 110 112 MicroBooNE 470 87 ICARUS T-600 600 476 1. Introduction Over the past 20 years there have been several experimental anomalies observed in neutrino PoS(NuFact2017)067 experiments with baselines of the order of <1km, which are referred to as short baseline exper- iments.
    [Show full text]
  • Neutrino Experiments
    Neutrino Experiments 1. Neutrinos and n observatories 2. Establishing n oscillation & mixing 3. Present questions and experiments Sofia Andringa, LIP July 2017 17th JINR-ISU Baikal Summer School on Physics of Elementary Particles and Astrophysics What are neutrinos? 1, 2, 3 n Neutrino n sources detection 1. Neutrinos and n observatories Discovery of neutrino oscillations the elementary particles g . g . W,Z Neutrino masses not to scale: == ZERO in the Standard Model what are neutrinos? 1930: an “undetected particle” ensuring energy conservation in b-decays (Pauli) Dear Radioactive Ladies and Gentlemen, (...) I have hit upon a desperate remedy to save (...) the law of energy conservation. (...) emitted together with the electron, in such a way that the sum of the energies (...) is constant. (...) electrically neutral particles (...) s n (Z,A) –> (Z+1,A) + b mass not larger than 0.01 proton mass(...) o r t c M(Z,A) = M(Z+1,A) + E e (...) the question concerning experimental proof of l e n –> p + e⁻ + v such a neutron, if it has something like about 10 times n i the penetrating capacity of a g -ray. y t i s n e t n I Electron kinetic energy (MeV) “inverse beta decay” 1934: Fermi, “attempt at a theory of b rays” weak interaction (GF~10⁻⁵ GeV ⁻ ²) cross-section ~ 10⁻⁴⁴ cm² for E ~ MeV mean free path of 10¹⁹ m in water or 1 out of 10¹⁹ interact in 1m of water need both a large number of neutrinos and a large number of targets (electron anti-)neutrinos detected 25 years after first proposal the Reines and Cowen experiment delayed coincidences in liquid scintilator Reines nobel lecture(1995) to detect neutrinos from nuclear reactors electron / muon / neutrino p -> mn -> enn are all the neutrinos the same? 3 types of detectable neutrinos Electron neutrino (1956) Muon neutrino (1962) (by Lederman, Steinberg & Schwartz, at BNL) following suggestion by B.
    [Show full text]
  • NEUTRINO PHYSICS Series in High Energy Physics, Cosmology and Gravitation
    NEUTRINO PHYSICS Series in High Energy Physics, Cosmology and Gravitation Other books in the series The Mathematical Theory of Cosmic Strings M R Anderson Geometry and Physics of Branes Edited by U Bruzzo, V Gorini and U Moschella Modern Cosmology Edited by S Bonometto, V Gorini and U Moschella Gravitation and Gauge Symmetries M Blagojevic Gravitational Waves Edited by I Ciufolini, V Gorini, U Moschella and P Fr´e Classical and Quantum Black Holes Edited by P Fr´e, V Gorini, G Magli and U Moschella Pulsars as Astrophysical Laboratories for Nuclear and Particle Physics F Weber The World in Eleven Dimensions Supergravity, Supermembranes and M-Theory Edited by M J Duff Particle Astrophysics Revised paperback edition H V Klapdor-Kleingrothaus and K Zuber Electron–Positron Physics at the Z M G Green, S L Lloyd, P N Ratoff and D R Ward Non-Accelerator Particle Physics Revised edition H V Klapdor-Kleingrothaus and A Staudt Idea and Methods of Supersymmetry and Supergravity or A Walk Through Superspace Revised edition I L Buchbinder and S M Kuzenko NEUTRINO PHYSICS K Zuber Denys Wilkinson Laboratory, University of Oxford, UK IP496.fm Page 1 Tuesday, April 4, 2006 4:17 PM Published in 2004 by Published in Great Britain by Taylor & Francis Group Taylor & Francis Group 270 Madison Avenue 2 Park Square New York, NY 10016 Milton Park, Abingdon Oxon OX14 4RN © 2004 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC No claim to original U.S. Government works Printed in the United States of America on acid-free paper 1098765432 International Standard Book Number-10: 0-7503-0750-1 (Hardcover) International Standard Book Number-13: 978-0-7503-0750-5 (Hardcover) This book contains information obtained from authentic and highly regarded sources.
    [Show full text]