<<

ANTICANCER RESEARCH 28: 1341-1348 (2008)

Review Inherited Predisposition Syndromes in Greece

ANGELA APESSOS1, EIRINI PAPADOPOULOU1, IOULIA BELOGIANNI1, SOTIRIS BARATSIS2, JOHN K. TRIANTAFILLIDIS3, PARIS KOSMIDIS3, EIRINI KARYDAS4, EVANGELOS BRIASOULIS5, CHRISTOS PISIOTIS6, KOSTAS PAPAZISIS7 and GEORGE NASIOULAS1,3

1Department of Molecular Biology, 4Breast Cancer Center, 6DTCA HYGEIA SA, Kifissias Av. & 4 Er. Stavrou str, 151 23 Maroussi, Athens; 2First Surgical Department, ‘Evangelismos' General Hospital of Athens, 45-47 Ipsilantou Street, Kolonaki, Athens; 3Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group; 5Department of Medical Oncology, University Hospital of Ioannina, Medical School, University of Ioannina, Ioannina; 7“Theagenion” Cancer Hospital, Al. Simeonides str. 2, 54007 Thessaloniki, Greece

Abstract. Hereditary cancer syndromes comprise Hereditary cancer syndromes comprise approximately 5-10% approximately 5-10% of diagnosed carcinomas. They are of diagnosed carcinomas. They are caused by mutations in caused by mutations in specific . Carriers of mutations in specific genes. Carriers of such mutations are at an increased these genes are at an increased risk of developing cancer at a risk of developing cancer at an early age. Today, there are a young age. When there is a suspicion of a hereditary cancer number of options available for the prevention and treatment predisposition syndrome a detailed family tree of the patient of inherited cancer predisposition syndrome for patients and requesting screening is constructed. DNA is isolated from all their families. Furthermore, advances in molecular biology available members of the family. Mutation detection is carried and in vitro fertilization techniques have made possible out on DNA from an affected family member. If a mutation is preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) for the prevention found the remaining family is screened. The genetic basis of a of the birth of children with the syndrome. large number of inherited cancer predisposition syndromes is The majority of diagnosed cancer cases are sporadic, known. In this paper the focus is on mutations in genes meaning there is no obvious family history. However, there responsible for colorectal cancer, meaning adenomatous is a small percentage of patients with an inherited cancer polyposis coli (APC), which is involved in familial predisposition syndrome (1, 2). With the completion of the adenomatous polyposis and homo sapiens mutL homolog 1 human project and the massive technological (hMLH1) and homo sapiens mutS homolog 2 (hMSH2), advances in the field of molecular diagnosis the number of involved in hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer. In known genes implicated in inherited cancer predisposition addition, the genes responsible for inherited and/or syndromes is increasing rapidly (3, 4). The types of inherited , genes 1 and 2 (BRCA1 and cancer syndromes known to date are summarized in Table I. BRCA2), and the rearranged during transfection proto- When there is a suspicion of an inherited cancer RET which is responsible for multiple endocrine predisposition syndrome it is necessary for a clinical geneticist neoplasia type 2 are discussed. In all cases emphasis is given to to obtain a complete family history, when possible, confirmed the data available on the Greek population. by medical records. The details are recorded in the form of a pedigree comprising of more than three generations, when possible. Individuals who meet one or more of the following characteristics are candidates for investigation of an inherited Correspondence to: G. Nasioulas, Ph.D., Head, Molecular Biology cancer predisposition syndrome (1): first degree affected Research Center HYGEIA “Antonis Papayiannis”, Kifissias Ave. relatives; two or more relatives with a cancer diagnosis; & Erythrou Stavrou 4 Str, GR151-23 Maroussi, Athens, Greece. cancer diagnosis in a family member before the age of 50; the Tel: +30 210 686 7932, Fax: +30 210 686 7933, e-mail: same type of cancer diagnosed in more than one relative; [email protected] more than one type of cancer diagnosed in the same Key Words: Inherited , adenomatous polyposis coli, individual and a very rare type of cancer identified in one or HNPCC, BRCA1, BRCA2, MEN 2, review. more members of the same family.

0250-7005/2008 $2.00+.40 1341 ANTICANCER RESEARCH 28: 1341-1348 (2008)

Table 1. Inherited cancer predisposition syndromes.

Syndrome Type of cancer (s)

Inherited breast and / or ovarian cancer syndrome Mainly breast and ovaries, in males BRCA1, BRCA2, prostate and pancreas CHEK2 Li-Fraumeni Sarcoma, breast, brain, , CHEK2 Cowden Syndrome Breast, thyroid, endometrium, etc PTEN Ataxia telangiectasia Leukemia, lymphoma ATM HNPCC Mainly CRC, endometrium, ovaries, hMLH1, hMSH2, urinary tract, stomach, pancreas hMSH6, hPMS1 FAP Mainly CRC, more rarely brain, thyroid and liver APC, MYH Hereditary gastric cancer Stomach CDH1 Peutz-Jeghers Syndrome Carcinomas of the gastrointestinal tract, breast, testicular cancer, STK11 gynecological malignancies Juvenile Polyposis CRC, stomach SMAD4, BMPR1A Neurofibromatosis 1 Neurofibrosarcomas, pheochromocytoma, NF1 optical glioma, meningioma Neurofibromatosis 2 Vestibular neuromas NF2 Xeroderma pigmentosum Skin cancer, melanoma, leukemia XPA, B, C, D, E, F, G POLH Von Hippel-Lindau Hemangioblastoma of the retina VHL Wilms Syndrome Wilms tumors WT1 Retinoblastoma Retinoblastoma, osteosarcoma RB1 Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 Adenomas of the pituitary glands and parathyroid parathyroid MEN1 adenoma, pituitary adenoma, pancreatic islet cell, carcinoid Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2 Myeloid carcinoma of the thyroid, pheochromocytoma, RET hyperplasias of the parathyroid

HNPCC: hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer, FAP: familial adenomatous polyposis, CRC: colorectal cancer.

In this review the focus is on the syndromes of inherited MRC-Holland, The Netherlands) (12, 18). If a large genomic colorectal cancer (CRC), breast and/or ovarian cancer and rearrangement is identified, the exact nature is characterized multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2 (MEN2) in the Greek by additional methods such as long-PCR, fluorescent in situ population. hybridization (FISH) restriction mapping and Southern blotting. Characterization of the mutation helps in Method confirming its pathogenicity and in developing an accurate diagnostic test for relatives of the proband (8, 12, 18). When investigating inherited disorders the first step is the compilation of a detailed family tree of the patients and Inherited Colorectal Cancer collection of specimens of whole blood. In our laboratory DNA is extracted from the whole blood by standard Familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP). CRC is the third methods. Mutation detection for point mutations and small most common type of cancer. The majority of cases are insertions / deletions is carried out by cycle sequencing using sporadic. Approximately 10% of all CRC cases are the BigDye Terminator Cycle Sequencing (Applied inherited, comprising a series of rare syndromes, which are Biosystems, Foster City, USA). Analysis of the sequencing mostly transmitted in an autosomal dominant manner. products is carried out by electrophoresis on a fluorescent The best known type of inherited CRC FAP with a ® automated DNA Sequencer (ABI Prism 310, Applied frequency of ~1:8,000, corresponding to 1% of all CRC Biosystems, Foster City, USA) (5, 6, 12, 18). Sequences diagnosed (5-8). FAP is a premalignant clinical entity obtained are aligned, using Sequencher® PC software (Gene characterized by the development of hundreds to thousands Codes, USA), with normal sequences from Genbank and of adenomatous polyps in the colorectum during the second examined for the presence of mutations. If no point and third decade of life. Approximately 80% of FAP patients mutations or small insertions / deletions are identified, harbour truncating germ-line mutations in the APC screening is carried out for the detection of large genomic (adenomatous polyposis coli) . FAP has rearrangements using the recently described method of a very high that reaches 90%. If polyps are left Multiplex Ligation-dependent Probe Amplification (MLPA, untreated 100% of the patients develop colorectal cancer.

1342 Apessos et al: Inherited Cancer in Greece (Review)

MYH is a recently identified gene, which encodes for a responsible for repairing oxidative damage in the DNA. It is believed to be involved in 1.4% of all cases of adenomatous polyposis and approximately 20% of APC- negative FAP cases. MYH-associated FAP is inherited in an autosomal recessive manner, i.e. mutations in both copies of the gene are necessary in order to cause the disease (11). As far as the Greek population is concerned, a search of the PubMed revealed only the results of our group by which 185 patients (62 families) with the suspicion of FAP have been analyzed. A pathogenic APC mutation has been identified in 26 families (41.9%) including a 250 Kb starting from intron 5 and extending beyond exon 15 (5-8). No founder mutations were found in the Greek population. In addition, 28 families have been investigated for in MYH mutations and in twelve patients from five families, a heterozygous mutation has been identified in the MYH gene. In one of the families that were analyzed, two mutations were identified. The affected individuals of the family had a classical FAP phenotype and were all shown to be compound heterozygotes for the two mutations. Individuals with a single mutation did not have a FAP phenotype.

Hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC). HNPCC is the most common inherited syndrome predisposing to CRC, accounting for 5-10% of the total CRC (12, 13). HNPCC segregates in an autosomal dominant manner and it is caused by germline mutations in a group of genes encoding involved in the DNA mismatch repair Figure 1. A. Pedigree of a FAP family. Black symbols indicate affected (MMR) pathway. At least five genes of the pathway, namely individuals. N inside a symbol indicates individual tested and found to be normal for the family mutation. B. Pedigree of a FAP family indicating the homo sapiens mutL homologue 1 (hMLH1) and mutS absence of the identified mutation in the parents of the affected child. The homologues 2 and 6 (hMSH2 and hMSH6) and the mutation identified (1309del5) is usually associated with a very early onset postmeiotic segregation increased genes 1 and 2 (hPMS1 and of the disease. In this case the child developed cancer at the age of 7. hPMS2), have been implicated in HNPCC (14-16). However, the majority of mutations (~90%) have been identified in hMLH1 (~50%) and hMSH2 (~40%). In HNPCC families, Frequently, patients with FAP develop other tumors affected individuals have inherited a , including brain, thyroid and liver tumors. Other exocolonic which leads to loss of function of one of the MMR genes. manifestations of FAP include desmoid tumors (Gardner Malignant transformation is the result of a second, somatic syndrome), cysts in the sebaceous glands and the jawbones mutation in the patient’s cells. HNPCC is characterized by and congenital hypertrophy of the retinal pigment epithelium early-onset CRC (mean age at diagnosis ~45 years) and an (CHRPE) (9). Despite its strong selective disadvantage, the increased incidence of cancer in other organs such as the incidence of FAP is maintained by the frequency of de novo endometrium, stomach, small bowel, ovary, hepatobiliary mutations, which account for about 30% of all cases. tract, renal pelvis and ureter (13, 17). An inherited predisposition to CRC may also be caused As was the case for FAP, the only available data on the by other rarer syndromes such as juvenile polyposis, caused Greek population has originated from our group (12). We by mutations in the homologue of mothers against have carried out genetic analysis of the MMR genes hMLH1 decapentaplegic drosophila, 4 (SMAD4) and the gene and hMSH2 in 140 patients from 37 families with a clinical encoding for bone morphogenetic protein -1A diagnosis of HNPCC (Figure 2). A pathogenic mutation has (BMPR1A), Peutz-Jeghers syndrome (Serine/threonine been identified in 10 (27%) of the families including a 2.2 kb 11 – STK11 gene) (10), and MutY human deletion encompassing exon 3 of the hMSH2 gene. In contrast homologue - associated FAP transmitted in an autosomal to other populations (16) the majority of mutations have been recessive manner (11). identified in the hMSH2 gene (60%). Furthermore, five of the

1343 ANTICANCER RESEARCH 28: 1341-1348 (2008)

Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer

Breast cancer is the most common malignancy in women and a major health problem in developed countries. It has been shown that the majority of hereditary breast / ovarian carcinomas can be attributed to mutations in two genes, breast cancer genes 1 and 2 (BRCA1 and BRCA2). The lifetime risk of developing breast or ovarian cancer for mutation carriers is 60-80% and 20-40%, respectively. The average age of breast cancer onset for mutation carriers is 42 years old, that is 20 years earlier than the average female population in the USA and W. Europe (18, 19). BRCA1 encodes for a protein, which seems to act as a transcription regulator and also have a role in the maintenance of genomic integrity. The major role of the protein encoded by BRCA2 seems to be in DNA damage repair. It is estimated that 6-7% of breast cancer and 10% of ovarian cancer in the general population is caused by mutations in one of the two genes. Our group and that of Yannoukakos's laboratory (20-22) have been carrying out mutation screening for the BRCA 1 and 2 genes in the Greek population for the past ten years. In our group a pathogenic mutation has been identified in 15.7% of the 70 families examined, eight families with a BRCA1 mutation including a deletion that encompasses 3.2 kb and three families with a BRCA2 mutation (18) (Figure 3). These results are in agreement with those of Yannoukakos et al. where deleterious mutations in one of the BRCA genes were identified in 20% of the families tested (20-22).

Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia Type 2 (MEN 2)

MEN 2 is an autosomal dominant inherited syndrome whose main characteristic is a strong predisposition to the development of endocrine tumors. Based on the affected tissue MEN 2 has been subdivided to three groups: MEN 2A - 69-90% of MEN 2 cases; MEN 2B - 5% and Familial medullary thyroid cancer - FMTC (5-35%). In all three Figure 2. HNPCC family with a Q158X (474C>T) point mutation in groups medullary thyroid cancer (MTC) is the main hMSH2. A. Family pedigree. Diagonal line across symbol indicates characteristic (23, 24). deceased individual. Arrow points to the index patient. A black dot inside MEN 2A is characterized by MTC (95% of cases), a symbol indicates carrier of the mutation, N inside symbol indicates individual tested and found not to carry the mutation. B. Denaturing high pheochromocytoma (50%) and hyperparathyroidism (20- performance liquid chromatography (dHPLC) analysis of exon 3 of the 30%). MEN 2B is characterized by MTC (100%), hMSH2. Control DNA of a normal individual was used for comparison. pheochromocytoma (50%), muciferous neuroma, intestinal C. Sequencing analysis of DNA from patient III:2 (Figure 2A). The ganglioneuroma and Marfan-like constitution. FMTC is mutation changes a glutamine for a stop codon (included in the box). characterized by a strong predisposition to MTC without associated problems of the parathyroid or the adrenal medulla. MEN 2 is caused by mutations in the rearranged identified mutations have not been previously described in the during transfection proto-oncogene (RET), which encodes literature (12). for a tyrosine kinase transmembrane receptor. The Our center has become the reference center for inherited syndrome is characterized by high penetrance (92%). CRC genetic diagnosis in Greece and has made an enormous Inherited MTC accounts for 20-25% of all MTC cases, the effort to record all Greek CRC families (5, 6, 9, 12). remainder being sporadic (23, 24).

1344 Apessos et al: Inherited Cancer in Greece (Review)

Figure 3. Pedigree of a family in which the mutation 5382insC has been identified in the BRCA1 gene.

As far as the Greek population is concerned there have before embryonic implantation. Couples requesting PGD have been only two reports of familial analysis of the RET proto- to go through routine in vitro fertilization (IVF) procedures, oncogene (23, 24). In the first report published in 1998 (23) although they are usually fertile, in order to generate a large a pathogenic mutation was identified in 66.67% (8/12 number of embryos for genetic testing. Genetic analysis is families). In the second report the RET proto-oncogene was performed within 24 hours allowing the selection of unaffected examined in 43 patients from 17 families. A mutation in embryos for transfer to the mother's uterus within the same exon 10 of the gene was identified in seven families and one IVF cycle (25). In theory, PGD could be offered for any in exon 11 in two families (Figure 4) (24). disorder of which the underlying molecular basis is known. In fact, in the period between January 1997 and May 2001, more Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis than 1,500 clinical PGD cycles were carried out in 25 European and Australian centers, resulting in 215 pregnancies and 117 Individuals who are affected by a genetic disease or carry a babies born (26). These cycles cover a wide spectrum of mutation are at an increased risk of transmitting this to disorders, including chromosomal abnormalities and a number their offspring. With increased understanding of the of late onset disorders, such as inherited predisposition to underlying basis of inherited disorders, the ability to screen cancer (FAP, Von Hippel-Lindau syndrome, retinoblastoma, individuals for a specific disorder has become possible. This Li-Fraumeni syndrome, neurofibromatosis types I and II and identifies mutation carriers who can then receive effective familial posterior fossa brain tumour) (27-29) or non-life genetic counseling and management. threatening, but nevertheless incapacitating disorders such as Despite the obvious advantages to couples at risk of having fragile X and Crouzon syndrome (30-33). an affected child, prenatal diagnosis of an established pregnancy suffers from a major drawback, namely the need for Conclusion terminating a fetus diagnosed as affected. For some couples termination of an established pregnancy is unacceptable on The results of genetic testing for inherited cancer moral or religious grounds. This is especially true for non life- predisposition syndromes in the Greek population have threatening or late onset disorders. This led to the advent of revealed that a combination of methods capable of detecting PGD, a very early form of prenatal diagnosis carried out both single point substitutions and small insertions/deletions

1345 ANTICANCER RESEARCH 28: 1341-1348 (2008)

a common founder mutation in the BRCA1 gene, 5382insC, accounts for 45% of the mutations identified in Greek breast/ovarian cancer families (22). Today, the genetic basis of a large portion of inherited cancer predisposition syndromes is known. In such cases, patients can benefit from genetic testing and genetic counseling. For confirmed carriers closer inspection is required while there is no need for clinical examinations for non-carriers. Early close inspection of carriers may significantly improve their life quality and expectancy. Furthermore, carriers can opt for genetic testing of their fetus (prenatal diagnosis) or embryos (PGD) in order to prevent transmission of the disorder to their offspring.

Acknowledgements

The recording of the Greek CRC families this has been possible through a grant obtained from the Stavros Niarchos Foundation and HYGEIA hospital.

References

1 Sifri R, Gangadharappa S and Acheson LS: Identifying and testing for hereditary susceptibility to common . CA Cancer J Clin 54: 309-326, 2004. 2 Olopade OI and Pichert G: Cancer genetics in oncology practice. Ann Oncol 12: 895-908, 2001. 3 Lindblom A and Nordenskjold M: The biology of inherited cancer. Semin Cancer Biol 10: 251-254, 2000. 4 Turnbull C and Hodgson S. Genetic predisposition to cancer. Clin Med 5: 491-498, 2005. 5 Mihalatos M, Danielides I, Beloyianni J, Harokopos E, Kalimanis G, Tsiava M et al: Novel mutations of the APC gene in Greek familial adenomatous polyposis patients. Cancer Genetics and Cytogenetics 141: 65-70, 2003. 6 Mihalatos M, Apessos A, Triantafillidis JK, Kosmidis PA, Fountzilas G, Agnantis NJ, Yannoukakos D and Nasioulas G: Evaluation of dHPLC in Mutation Screening of the APC Gene in a Greek FAP Cohort. Anticancer Res 23: 2691-2696, 2003. Figure 4. A. Pedigree of a family in which the mutation C618R was 7 Mihalatos M, Apessos A, Papadopoulou E, Agnantis NJ, identified in exon 10 of the RET proto-oncogene. B. Sequencing analysis Yannoukakos D, Fountzilas G and Nasioulas G: Genetic of DNA from patient 3 (Figure 4A). The top panel corresponds to DNA alterations of the APC gene in familial adenomatous polyposis from a normal individual. The bottom panel corresponds to the DNA patients of the Hellenic group for the study of colorectal cancer. carrying the mutation. Anticancer Res 23: 2191-2194, 2003. 8 Mihalatos M, Apessos A, Dauwerse H, Velissariou V, Psychias A, Koliopanos A et al: Rare mutations predisposing to familial adenomatous polyposis in Greek FAP patients. BMC Cancer 5(1): 40, 2005. in addition to large genomic rearrangements is necessary as a 9 Hamilton SR, Liu B, Parsons RE, Papadopoulos N, Jen J, gross rearrangement has been identified in one family each in Powell SM, Krush AJ et al: The molecular basis of Turcot's FAP, HNPCC and inherited breast/ovarian cancer (8, 12, 18). syndrome. N Engl J Med 332: 839-847, 1995. Another interesting point immerging from the study of 10 Dunlop MG: British Society for Gastroenterology; Association of Coloproctology for Great Britain and Ireland. Guidance on the Greek population is the fact that in contrast to other gastrointestinal surveillance for hereditary non-polyposis populations no founder mutations have been identified in colorectal cancer, familial adenomatous polypolis, juvenile FAP and HNPCC making genetic testing of these polyposis, and Peutz-Jeghers syndrome. Gut 51(Suppl 5): 21- conditions more time consuming and expensive. In contrast, 27, 2002.

1346 Apessos et al: Inherited Cancer in Greece (Review)

11 Jones S, Emmerson P, Maynard J, Best JM, Jordan S, 23 Karga HJ, Karayianni MK, Linos DA, Tseleni SC, Karaiskos Williams GT, Sampson JR and Cheadle JP: Biallelic germline KD and Papapetrou PD: Germ line mutation analysis in mutations in MYH predispose to multiple colorectal adenoma families with multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2A or familial and somatic G:C->T:A mutations. Hum Mol Genet 11: 2961- medullary thyroid carcinoma. Eur J Endocrinol 1139: 410- 2967, 2002. 415, 1998. 12 Apessos A, Mihalatos M, Danielidis I, Kallimanis G, Agnantis 24 Pazaitou-Panayiotou K, Kaprara A, Sarika L, Zovoilis T, NJ, Triantafillidis JK et al: hMSH2 is the most commonly Belogianni I, Vainas I and Nasioulas G : Efficient testing of the mutated MMR gene in a cohort of Greek HNPCC patients. Br RET gene by DHPLC analysis for MEN 2 syndrome in a cohort J Cancer 92: 396-404, 2005. of patients. Anticancer Res 25: 2091-2095, 2005. 13 Lynch HT and de la Chapelle A: Genetic susceptibility to non- 25 Delhanty JDA: Preimplantation diagnosis. Prenat Diagn 14: polyposis colorectal cancer. J Med Genet 36: 801-818, 1999. 1217-1227, 1994. 14 Leach FS, Nicolaides NC, Papadopoulos N, Liu B, Jen J, 26 ESHRE PGD Consortium Steering Committee. ESHRE Parsons R, Peltomaki P, Sistonen P, Aaltonen LA, Nystrom- Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis Consortium: Data collection Lahti M et al: Mutations of a mutS homolog in hereditary III (May 2001) Hum Reprod 17: 233-146, 2002. nonpolyposis colorectal cancer. Cell 75: 1215-1225, 1993. 27 Ao A, Wells D, Handyside AH, Winston RML and Delhanty 15 Papadopoulos N and Lindblom A: Molecular basis of HNPCC: JDA: Preimplantation genetic diagnosis of inherited cancer: mutations of MMR genes. Hum Mutat 10: 89-99, 1997. familial adenomatous polyposis coli. J Assist Reprod Genet 15: 16 Peltomäki P and Vasen HF: Mutations predisposing to hereditary 140-144, 1998. nonpolyposis colorectal cancer: database and results of a 28 Abou-Sleiman PM, Apessos A, Harper JC, Serhal P, Winston collaborative study. The International Collaborative Group on RML and Delhanty JDA: First application of preimplantation Hereditary Nonpolyposis Colorectal Cancer. Gastroenterology genetic diagnosis to neurofibromatosis type 2 (NF2). Prenat 113: 1146-1158, 1997. Diagn 22: 519-524, 2002. 17 Watson P and Lynch HT: Extracolonic cancer in hereditary 29 Rechitsky S, Verlinsky O, Chistokhina A, Sharapova T, Ozen nonpolyposis colorectal cancer. Cancer 71: 677-685, 1993. S, Masciangelo C, Kuliev A and Verlinsky Y: Preimplantation 18 Belogianni I, Apessos A, Mihalatos M, Razi E, Labropoulos S, genetic diagnosis for cancer predisposition. Reprod Biomed Petounis A et al: Characterization of a novel large deletion and Online 5: 148-55, 2002. single point mutations in the BRCA1 gene in a Greek cohort 30 Sermon K, Lissens W, Messiaen L, Bonduelle M, Vandervorst of families with suspected hereditary breast cancer. BMC M, Van SA and Liebaers I: Preimplantation genetic diagnosis Cancer 4: 61, 2004. of Marfan syndrome with the use of fluorescent polymerase 19 Nathanson KN, Wooster R and Webber BL: Breast cancer chain reaction and the Automated Laser Fluorescence DNA genetics: What we know and what we need. Nature Medicine 7: Sequencer. Fertil Steril 71: 163-166, 1999. 552-556, 2001. 31 Apessos A, Abou-Sleiman PM, Harper JC and Delhanty JDA: 20 Konstantopoulou I, Kroupis C, Ladopoulou A, Pantazidis A, Preimplantation genetic diagnosis of the fragile X syndrome by Boumba D, Lianidou ES, Petersen MB, Florentin L, Chiotellis use of linked polymorphic markers. Prenat Diagn 21: 504-511, E, Nounesis G, Efstathiou E, Skarlos D, Tsionou C, Fountzilas 2001. G and Yannoukakos D: BRCA1 mutation analysis in 32 Abou-Sleiman PM, Apessos A, Harper JC, Serhal P and breast/ovarian cancer families from Greece. Hum Mutat 16: Delhanty JDA: Pregnancy following preimplantation genetic 272-273, 2000. diagnosis for Crouzon syndrome. Mol Hum Reprod 8: 304-309, 21 Armakolas A, Ladopoulou A, Konstantopoulou I, Pararas B, 2002. Gomatos IP, Kataki A, Konstadoulakis MM, Stathopoulos GP, 33 Harper JC, Wells D, Piyamongkol W, Abou-Sleiman PM, Markopoulos C, Leandros E, Gogas I, Yannoukakos D and Apessos A, Ioulianos A, Davis M, Doshi A, Serhal P, Ranieri Androulakis G: BRCA2 gene mutations in Greek patients with M, Rodeck C and Delhanty JDA: Preimplantation genetic familial breast cancer. Hum Mutat 19: 81-82, 2002. diagnosis for single gene disorders: experience with five single 22 Konstantopoulou I, Rampias T, Ladopoulou A, Koutsodontis gene disorders. Prenat Diagn 22: 525-533, 2002. G, Armaou S, Anagnostopoulos T, Nikolopoulos G, Kamakari S, Nounesis G, Stylianakis A, Karanikiotis C, Razis E, Gogas H, Keramopoulos A, Gaki V, Markopoulos C, Skarlos D, Pandis N, Bei T, Arzimanoglou I, Fountzilas G and Yannoukakos D: Greek BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation Received June 14, 2007 spectrum: two BRCA1 mutations account for half the carriers Revised January 29, 2008 found among high-risk breast/ovarian cancer patients. Breast Accepted February 14, 2008 Cancer Res Treat 2007 Apr 24

1347