DOCSLIB.ORG

Physical, Assessment, Bedrock, Aggregate, Lake Superior

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Physical, Assessment, Bedrock, Aggregate, Lake Superior Ontario Geological Survey Open File Report 6072 Physical Evaluation and Assessment of Bedrock Aggregate Resource Potential, North Shore of Lake Superior 2001 ONTARIO GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Open File Report 6072 Physical Evaluation and Assessment of Bedrock Aggregate Resource Potential, North Shore of Lake Superior by Jagger Hims Limited, Clayton Research Limited and Agritrans Limited 2001 Parts of this publication may be quoted if credit is given. It is recommended that reference to this publication be made in the following form: Jagger Hims Limited, Clayton Research Limited and Agritrans Limited 2001. Physical evaluation and assessment of bedrock aggregate resource potential, north shore of Lake Superior; Ontario Geological Survey, Open File Report 6072, 92p. e Queen’s Printer for Ontario, 2001 e Queen’s Printer for Ontario, 2001. Open File Reports of the Ontario Geological Survey are available for viewing at the Mines Library in Sudbury, at the Mines and Minerals Information Centre in Toronto, and at the regional Mines and Minerals office whose district includes the area covered by the report (see below). Copies can be purchased at Publication Sales and the office whose district includes the area covered by the report. Al- though a particular report may not be in stock at locations other than the Publication Sales office in Sudbury, they can generally be obtained within 3 working days. All telephone, fax, mail and e-mail orders should be directed to the Publica- tion Sales office in Sudbury. Use of VISA or MasterCard ensures the fastest possible service. Cheques or money orders should be made payable to the Minister of Finance. Mines and Minerals Information Centre (MMIC) Tel: (416) 314-3800 Macdonald Block, Room M2-17 1-800-665-4480(toll free inside Ontario) 900 Bay St. Toronto, Ontario M7A 1C3 Mines Library Tel: (705) 670-5615 933 Ramsey Lake Road, Level A3 Sudbury, Ontario P3E 6B5 Publication Sales Tel: (705) 670-5691(local) 933 Ramsey Lake Rd., Level A3 1-888-415-9845(toll-free) Sudbury, Ontario P3E 6B5 Fax: (705) 670-5770 E-mail: [email protected] Regional Mines and Minerals Offices: Kenora - Suite 104, 810 Robertson St., Kenora P9N 4J2 Kirkland Lake - 10 Government Rd. E., Kirkland Lake P2N 1A8 Red Lake - Box 324, Ontario Government Building, Red Lake P0V 2M0 Sault Ste. Marie - 70 Foster Dr., Ste. 200, Sault Ste. Marie P6A 6V8 Southern Ontario - P.O. Bag Service 43, Old Troy Rd., Tweed K0K 3J0 Sudbury - Level B3, 933 Ramsey Lake Rd., Sudbury P3E 6B5 Thunder Bay - Suite B002, 435 James St. S., Thunder Bay P7E 6S7 Timmins - Ontario Government Complex, P.O. Bag 3060, Hwy. 101 East, South Porcupine P0N 1H0 Toronto - MMIC, Macdonald Block, Room M2-17, 900 Bay St., Toronto M7A 1C3 This report has not received a technical edit. Discrepancies may occur for which the Ontario Ministry of Northern Devel- opment and Mines does not assume any liability. Source referencesare included in the report and users are urged to verify critical information. Recommendations and statements of opinions expressed are those of the author or authors and are not to be construed as statements of government policy. If you wish to reproduce any of the text, tables or illustrations in this report, please write for permission to the Team Leader, Publication Services, Ministry of Northern Development and Mines, 933 Ramsey Lake Road, Level B4, Sudbury, Ontario P3E 6B5. Cette publication est disponible en anglais seulement. Parts of this report may be quoted if credit is given. It is recommended that reference be made in the following form: Jagger Hims Limited, Clayton Research Limited and Agritrans Limited 2001. Physical evaluation and assessment of bedrock aggregate resource potential, north shore of Lake Superior; Ontario Geological Survey, Open File Report 6072, 92p. iii CONTENTS ABSTRACT ............................................................................................................................................... xiii 1.0 INTRODUCTION...................................................................................................... 1 1.1 BACKGROUND....................................................................................................................1 1.2 DEFINITIONS.......................................................................................................................1 1.3 OBJECTIVES AND SCOPE .................................................................................................2 1.4 STUDY APPROACH AND METHODOLOGY...................................................................2 1.5 LOCATION, PHYSIOGRAPHY AND ACCESS .................................................................3 1.6 PREVIOUS WORK AND REFERENCES............................................................................5 2.0 REGIONAL GEOLOGY AND AGGREGATE POTENTIAL ........................................5 2.1 GEOLOGIC DIVISIONS.......................................................................................................5 2.2 BEDROCK GEOLOGY.........................................................................................................7 2.3 SURFICIAL GEOLOGY .......................................................................................................9 2.4 AGGREGATE POTENTIAL OF BEDROCK UNITS........................................................11 3.0 CANDIDATE RESOURCE AREAS .....................................................................................12 3.1 CANDIDATE RESOURCE AREA SELECTION...............................................................12 3.2 DISCUSSION OF CANDIDATE RESOURCE AREAS.....................................................13 3.2.1 Candidate Resource Area 1....................................................................................13 3.2.2 Candidate Resource Area 2....................................................................................16 3.2.3 Candidate Resource Area 3....................................................................................19 3.2.4 Candidate Resource Area 4....................................................................................19 3.2.5 Candidate Resource Area 5....................................................................................22 3.2.6 Candidate Resource Area 6....................................................................................24 3.2.7 Candidate Resource Area 7....................................................................................24 3.2.8 Candidate Resource Area 8....................................................................................26 3.2.9 Candidate Resource Area 9....................................................................................26 3.2.10 Candidate Resource Area 10..................................................................................29 3.2.11 Candidate Resource Area 11..................................................................................31 3.2.12 Candidate Resource Area 12..................................................................................33 3.2.13 Candidate Resource Area 13..................................................................................35 3.2.14 Candidate Resource Area 14..................................................................................37 3.2.15 Candidate Resource Area 15..................................................................................38 v 4.0 TRANSPORTATION OF AGGREGATE............................................................................39 4.1 INTRODUCTION................................................................................................................39 4.2 MARINE TRANSPORTATION VESSELS........................................................................39 4.3 PORT FACILITIES .............................................................................................................40 4.3.1 General...................................................................................................................40 4.3.2 Existing North Shore Ports.....................................................................................41 4.3.3 New Facilities ........................................................................................................42 4.3.4 Receiving Ports ......................................................................................................44 4.4 COSTS OF MARINE TRANSPORT...................................................................................44 4.4.1 General...................................................................................................................44 4.4.2 Loading/Unloading ................................................................................................46 4.4.3 Navigation..............................................................................................................46 4.4.4 Storage/Haulage .....................................................................................................47 4.5 FREIGHT RATE COMPARISONS ....................................................................................47 4.6 RAIL TRANSPORT ............................................................................................................49 5.0 ECONOMICS ...............................................................................................................................50 5.1 INTRODUCTION................................................................................................................50
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Black Bay Peninsula Area
    THESE TERMS GOVERN YOUR USE OF THIS DOCUMENT Your use of this Ontario Geological Survey document (the “Content”) is governed by the terms set out on this page (“Terms of Use”). By downloading this Content, you (the “User”) have accepted, and have agreed to be bound by, the Terms of Use. Content: This Content is offered by the Province of Ontario’s Ministry of Northern Development and Mines (MNDM) as a public service, on an “as-is” basis. Recommendations and statements of opinion expressed in the Content are those of the author or authors and are not to be construed as statement of government policy. You are solely responsible for your use of the Content. You should not rely on the Content for legal advice nor as authoritative in your particular circumstances. Users should verify the accuracy and applicability of any Content before acting on it. MNDM does not guarantee, or make any warranty express or implied, that the Content is current, accurate, complete or reliable. MNDM is not responsible for any damage however caused, which results, directly or indirectly, from your use of the Content. MNDM assumes no legal liability or responsibility for the Content whatsoever. Links to Other Web Sites: This Content may contain links, to Web sites that are not operated by MNDM. Linked Web sites may not be available in French. MNDM neither endorses nor assumes any responsibility for the safety, accuracy or availability of linked Web sites or the information contained on them. The linked Web sites, their operation and content are the responsibility of the person or entity for which they were created or maintained (the “Owner”).
    [Show full text]
  • Lake Superior Study Area’S Mixed European-Indian Ancestry Community
    Historical Profile of the Lake Superior Study Area’s Mixed European-Indian Ancestry Community FINAL REPORT PREPARED BY FOR THE OFFICE OF THE FEDERAL INTERLOCUTOR SEPTEMBER 2007 Lake SuperiorMixed Ancestry Final Report Historical Profile of the Lake Superior Study Area’s Mixed European-Indian Ancestry Community TABLE OF CONTENTS Map: The proposed Lake Superior NMCA 3 Executive Summary 4 Methodology/Introduction 5 Comments on Terminology 6 Chapter 1: Study Region from the 17th Century to the 1840s 8 Ojibway Indians residing on the North Shore of Lake Superior 8 Europeans and the Study Area 9 Royal Proclamation of 1763 and the Quebec Act of 1774 12 Mention of Mixed-Ancestry people in the Study Region 15 Chapter 2: Aboriginal Pressure for a Treaty Relationship 25 Louis Agassiz and the Study Region, 1848 28 Treaty Exploratory Commission 28 Mica Bay, 1849 33 Vidal and Anderson Report 35 Government Instructions about Treaty Terms 37 Robinson Travels to Sault Ste. Marie 38 Request for Recognition of “Halfbreed” rights 40 Negotiation of the Robinson-Superior Treaty 40 Chapter 3: Post-Treaty Government Activity 44 “Halfbreed” inclusion in Robinson-Superior Treaty Annuity Paylists 44 Postal Service in the Study Region 46 Crown Activity between 1853 and 1867 46 Chapter 4: Settlement, Resource Development, and Government Administration within the Study Region, 1864-1901 51 Policing 53 Post Office and Railroad 55 Census Information and the Study Region 58 1871, 1881, and 1891 Censuses – Nipigon 59 1881 Census – Silver Islet 61 1901 Census – Nipigon Township (including Dorion), Rossport (including Pays Plat), and Schreiber 62 Small townships not included in early Censuses 63 Joan Holmes and Associates, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Movement, Resource Use, and Life History Strategies of Black Bay Walleye (Sander Vitreus)
    Movement, resource use, and life history strategies of Black Bay Walleye (Sander vitreus) A thesis presented to The Faculty of Graduate Studies of Lakehead University by GRAYDON MCKEE In partial fulfilment of requirements For the degree of Master of Science in Biology December 1, 2018 © Graydon McKee, 2018 Abstract Resource distribution across the landscape can drive movement strategy selection, from sedentary to highly mobile individuals. When paired with other forms of analysis, movement ecology can provide insight into the resource use, habitat selection, and life history strategies of fish. Acoustic telemetry has greatly improved our understanding of fish movement in the Laurentian Great Lakes, and Walleye (Sander vitreus), as a fish of great economic and social importance, have been intensively studied. While the degree of migration through the Great Lakes has been assessed, there remains a knowledge gap surrounding within-population variation in this movement. Black Bay once supported the largest commercial fishery for Walleye on Lake Superior, until its collapse in the late 1960s, and the recovery of this population has become a management priority on the lake. Management decisions have however, lacked precise information on the spatial extent, resource use, and life history of Black Bay Walleye. My thesis makes use of a two year acoustic telemetry study to assess Walleye movement within Black Bay and into the main body of Lake Superior. This was done with the goal of identifying Walleye movement patterns, and the influence of thermal-optical habitat and forage availability on these movement patterns. Black Bay Walleye have distinct migratory and resident groups, where migrators leave Black Bay during part of the year, and residents remain within Black Bay all year.
    [Show full text]
  • Woodland Caribou Range Occupancy in Northwestern Ontario: Past and Present
    The Eight North American Caribou Workshop, Whitehorse, Yukon, Canada, 20-24 April, 1998. Woodland caribou range occupancy in northwestern Ontario: past and present G.D. Racey1 & T. Armstrong2 1 Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources, RR#1 25th Sideroad, Thunder Bay, Ont., Canada P7C 4T9 ([email protected]. on. ca). 2 Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources, 435 James Street S., Suite 221, Thunder Bay, Ont., Canada P7E 6S8. Abstract: A zone of continuous woodland caribou (Rangifer tarandm caribou) distribution is defined for northwestern Ontario. This zone establishes a benchmark for measuring the success of future management of habitat and conservation of populations. Inventory of key winter, summer and calving habitats reaffirms the concept of a dynamic mosaic of habi• tat tracts that supports caribou across the landscape. The historical range recession leading to this current distribution has been associated with resource development, fire and hunting activities over the past 150 years, and numerous attempts at conservation over the last 70 years. The decline was apparently phased according to several periods of devel• opment activity: i) early exploitation in the early to mid-1800s; ii) isolation and extirpation of southern populations due to rapid changes in forest use and access between 1890 and 1930; and iii) further loss of the southernmost herds due to forest harvesting of previously inaccessible areas since the 1950s. Lessons learned from history support current con• servation measures to manage caribou across broad landscapes, protect southern herds, maintain caribou habitat as part of continuous range, maintain large contiguous tracts of older forest and ensure connectivity between habitat compo• nents.
    [Show full text]
  • A Biodiversity Conservation Assessment for Lake Superior, Volume 2: Regional Unit Summaries
    Lake Superior Biodiversity Conservation Assessment: Vol. 2 Regional Unit Summaries Final Draft, June 2013 A Biodiversity Conservation Assessment for Lake Superior Volume 2: Regional Unit Summaries Prepared by the Superior Work Group of the Lake Superior Lakewide Action and Management Plan Final Draft: June 2013 Updated: September 2015 Lake Superior Biodiversity Conservation Assessment: Vol. 2 Regional Unit Summaries Final Draft, June 2013 Recommended Citation Lake Superior Lakewide Action and Management Plan (LAMP) - Superior Work Group. 2013. Lake Superior Biodiversity Conservation Assessment: Regional Unit Summaries. 282p. (Updated May 2015). Disclaimer This report reflects the best efforts of the preparers (Dan Kraus and Megan Ihrig) to accurately represent and interpret the available expertise and information on Lake Superior and the views and opinions of project participants. Every effort to ensure the accuracy of the information contained in this study has been taken. We welcome suggestions for improvements. Data Sources For a full list of the Data Sources and Methods used to create the Tables and Figures throughout this Regional Unit Summaries report please see Appendix A: Spatial Data Catalogue and Methods. Volume 1: Lakewide Assessment & Volume 2: Regional Summaries Please note that this report includes two volumes. Volume 1 includes an assessment of lakewide biodiversity target health and threats. Volume 2 contains regional summaries and maps that are presented in this document. It is recognized that many regions contain additional information and mapping on biodiversity and threats that could not be fully reflected in this report. Wherever possible, regional and local data and spatial information on biodiversity targets and threats has been noted in the text.
    [Show full text]
  • Black Bay Area
    THESE TERMS GOVERN YOUR USE OF THIS DOCUMENT Your use of this Ontario Geological Survey document (the “Content”) is governed by the terms set out on this page (“Terms of Use”). By downloading this Content, you (the “User”) have accepted, and have agreed to be bound by, the Terms of Use. Content: This Content is offered by the Province of Ontario’s Ministry of Northern Development and Mines (MNDM) as a public service, on an “as-is” basis. Recommendations and statements of opinion expressed in the Content are those of the author or authors and are not to be construed as statement of government policy. You are solely responsible for your use of the Content. You should not rely on the Content for legal advice nor as authoritative in your particular circumstances. Users should verify the accuracy and applicability of any Content before acting on it. MNDM does not guarantee, or make any warranty express or implied, that the Content is current, accurate, complete or reliable. MNDM is not responsible for any damage however caused, which results, directly or indirectly, from your use of the Content. MNDM assumes no legal liability or responsibility for the Content whatsoever. Links to Other Web Sites: This Content may contain links, to Web sites that are not operated by MNDM. Linked Web sites may not be available in French. MNDM neither endorses nor assumes any responsibility for the safety, accuracy or availability of linked Web sites or the information contained on them. The linked Web sites, their operation and content are the responsibility of the person or entity for which they were created or maintained (the “Owner”).
    [Show full text]
  • Lake Superior Regional Unit Summaries Draft Report
    Lake Superior Biodiversity Conservation Assessment REGIONAL UNIT SUMMARIES Draft information for review and comment Lake Superior Regional Unit Summaries - Draft Report Prepared for the Superior Work Group (SWG) of the Lake Superior Lakewide Action and Management Plan (LAMP) Draft for Review: February 22, 2013 Disclaimer This report reflects the best efforts of the preparers to accurately represent and interpret the available expertise and information on Lake Superior, and the views and opinions of project participants. Every effort to ensure the accuracy of the information contained in this study has been taken. We welcome expert input of additional information, and expect that new information will be added through consultation. Lake Superior Biodiversity Conservation Assessment REGIONAL UNIT SUMMARIES Draft information for review and comment 1. Goulais HEALTHY WATERS REPORT CARD OFFSHORE NA ISLANDS A NEARSHORE B COASTAL WETLANDS B INSHORE B COASTAL TERRESTRIAL A TRIBUTARIES & B OVERALL B+ WATERSHEDS Report card denotes general condition/health of each biodiversity target in the region based on condition/stress indices. See introduction to the regional summaries. A Ecologically desirable status; requires little intervention for Insert Picture Very maintenance Good B Within acceptable range of variation; may require some Insert Text Good intervention for maintenance. C Outside of the range of acceptable variation and requires Fair management. If unchecked, the biodiversity target may be vulnerable to serious degradation. D Allowing the biodiversity target to remain in this condition for Poor an extended period will make restoration or preventing extirpation practically impossible. Unknown Insufficient information. Summary/ Description The Goulais regional unit is located in Ontario on the eastern shore of Lake Superior, and extends from the international boundary at the St.
    [Show full text]
  • 7-Black Sturgeon BCA Regional Unit Background Chapter
    7. Black Sturgeon HEALTHY WATERS REPORT CARD OFFSHORE NA ISLANDS A NEARSHORE C COASTAL WETLANDS A- EMBAYMENTS & B COASTAL TERRESTRIAL A+ INSHORE TRIBUTARIES & A OVERALL A- WATERSHEDS Report card denotes general condition/health of each biodiversity target in the region based on condition/stress indices. See introduction to the regional summaries. A Ecologically desirable status; requires little intervention for Very maintenance Good B Within acceptable range of variation; may require some Good intervention for maintenance. C Outside of the range of acceptable variation and requires Fair management. If unchecked, the biodiversity target may be vulnerable to serious degradation. D Allowing the biodiversity target to remain in this condition for Poor an extended period will make restoration or preventing extirpation practically impossible. Unknown Insufficient information. The Black Sturgeon River, looking towards the river mouth. Photo credit: Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources Summary/ Description The Black Sturgeon regional unit is located on the northern shore of Lake Superior. This regional unit is 6,333 km2 in size, including the associated nearshore waters. The Black Sturgeon regional unit extends from near Thunder Bay in the west, to near the communities of Red Rock and Nipigon in the east. Communities in this regional unit include Red Rock, Red Rock Indian Band (Lake Helen First Nation), the Township of Shuniah, and the Township of Dorion. This regional unit includes Black Bay, a portion of Thunder Bay, and the Sibley and Black Bay Peninsulas. A number of provincial parks, nature reserves and conservation areas are located in this regional unit. The Lakehead Region Conservation Authority’s area of jurisdiction covers eight municipalities, including municipalities in the Black Sturgeon and Arrow and Dog regional units.
    [Show full text]
  • Prince Arthur's Landing
    ENVIRENVIRONMENTONMENTALAL ASSESSMENTASSESSMENT FORF OR THETHE MARMARATHONTHON PGM-CPGM-Cu PRPROJECTOJECT AT MARMARATHON,THON, ONTONTARIOARIO STILLWATERSTILLWATER CANADACANADA INC.INC. MARATHONMARATHON PGM-CuPGM-Cu PROJECTPROJECT SUPPORTINGSUPPORTING INFORMATIONINFORMATION DOCUMENTDOCUMENT No.No. 2626 - MARATHONMARATHON PGM-CuPGM-Cu PROJECTPROJECT - ASSESSMENTASSESSMENT OFOF IMPACTSIMPACTS ONON WOODLANDWOODLAND CARIBOUCARIBOU PreparedPrepared by:by: NorthernNorthern BBioscienceioscience 363363 VanVan HorneHorne StreetStreet ThunderThunder BBay,ay, OONN P7AP7A 3G33G3 MARATHON PLATINUM GROUP METALS AND COPPER MINE PROJECT Woodland Caribou Impact Assessment July 19, 2012 Prepared for: Stillwater Canada Inc. Prepared by: Dr. Robert F. Foster Allan G. Harris Marathon PGM-Cu Project Caribou EIS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Forest-dwelling woodland caribou (Rangifer tarandus caribou) are listed as Threatened under both federal and provincial species at risk legislation. They are the focus of a provincial conservation plan. Woodland caribou range and abundance in Ontario have declined, mainly due to anthropogenic disturbance and associated changes in alternate prey and predator abundance. Across the north shore of Lake Superior, they are now almost entirely restricted to isolated populations in protected areas. The largest populations, approximately 100 and 400 individuals respectively, are found within Slate Islands and Michipicoten Island provincial parks, both of which lack large predators. Pukaskwa National Parks’ population has declined from approximately 30 caribou in the 1970s to an estimated four currently, largely due to predation by wolves and possibly black bears. An estimated 8 to 15 caribou still use Pic Island in Neys Provincial Park and adjacent mainland at least part of the year, down from approximately 80 in the 1970s. The OMNR has designated a 10-km wide strip along the north shore of Lake Superior as the “Lake Superior Coastal Range”.
    [Show full text]
  • Is Ruggedness a Key Habitat Feature for Woodland Caribou Along the Lake Superior Coast?
    Lakehead University Knowledge Commons,http://knowledgecommons.lakeheadu.ca Electronic Theses and Dissertations Undergraduate theses 2018 Is Ruggedness a Key Habitat Feature for Woodland Caribou Along the Lake Superior Coast? McClinchey, Jack http://knowledgecommons.lakeheadu.ca/handle/2453/4423 Downloaded from Lakehead University, KnowledgeCommons IS RUGGEDNESS A KEY HABITAT FEATURE FOR WOODLAND CARIBOU ALONG THE LAKE SUPERIOR COAST? by Jack McClinchey Source: Roberta Bondar, 2001 FACULTY OF NATURAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT LAKEHEAD UNIVERSITY THUNDER BAY, ONTARIO April 20th, 2018 IS RUGGEDNESS A KEY HABITAT FEATURE FOR WOODLAND CARIBOU ALONG THE LAKE SUPERIOR COAST? by Jack McClinchey An undergraduate thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Honours Bachelor of Science in Forestry Faculty of Natural Resources Management Lakehead University April 20th, 2018 Major Advisor Second Reader ii LIBRARY RIGHTS STATEMENT In presenting this thesis in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the HBScF degree at Lakehead University in Thunder Bay, I agree that the University will make it freely available for inspection. This thesis is made available by my authority solely for the purpose of private study and research and may not be copied or reproduced in whole or in part (except as permitted by the Copyright Laws) without my written authority. Signature: Date: iii A CAUTION TO THE READER This HBSCF thesis has been through a semi-formal process of review and comment by at least two faculty members. It is made available on loan by the Faculty of Natural Resources Management for the purpose of advancing the practice of professional and scientific forestry. The reader should be aware that the opinions and conclusions expressed in this document are those of the student and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the thesis supervisor, the faculty, or Lakehead University.
    [Show full text]
  • 2-14 OB Vol 21#1 Apr 2003.Pdf
    2 Articles The Sharp-tailed Grouse in Thunder Bay District Nicholas G. Escott The Sharp-tailed Grouse (Tympan­ North American continent. This sub­ uchus phasianellus) is known to be a species expanded its range eastward permanent resident in three widely and northward toward the end of separated areas of Ontario: the the 19th century, as it disappeared Hudson Bay Lowland; the Rainy from its original range due to inten­ River/Fort Frances and Dryden areas sive agricultural practices that in the northwest; and Sault Ste. Marie destroyed its native habitat (Roberts and Manitoulin Island (Lumsden 1936). It entered northwestern 1987). Even though the species is Ontario in the wake of settlement thought probably to range all across and land clearing, aided by construc­ northern Ontario (Peck and James tion of two railroads: the CPR line, 1983, Lumsden 1987), there are large north of Lake of the Woods; and the gaps in the distribution of records of Canadian Northern Railway, south this species there. Since 1993, howev­ of Lake of the Woods. The latter was er, we have found evidence of breed­ completed in 1902, and both brought ing populations of this grouse in this Canadian prairie wheat to the gap, north of Lake Superior. In this Lakehead. The grain cars of the time paper, I review the historical occur­ were leaky wooden boxcars that left rence of the Sharp-tailed Grouse, and a trail of grain across the forested the current status of this species, in wilderness (Miller 1963). Thunder Bay District. The other Sharp-tailed Grouse subspecies that has been recorded Subspecies of the Sharp-tailed in Ontario is the Northern Sharp­ Grouse tailed Grouse.
    [Show full text]
  • Black B. Pen. and Vicinity: Edward I. Sheet
    THESE TERMS GOVERN YOUR USE OF THIS DOCUMENT Your use of this Ontario Geological Survey document (the “Content”) is governed by the terms set out on this page (“Terms of Use”). By downloading this Content, you (the “User”) have accepted, and have agreed to be bound by, the Terms of Use. Content: This Content is offered by the Province of Ontario’s Ministry of Northern Development and Mines (MNDM) as a public service, on an “as-is” basis. Recommendations and statements of opinion expressed in the Content are those of the author or authors and are not to be construed as statement of government policy. You are solely responsible for your use of the Content. You should not rely on the Content for legal advice nor as authoritative in your particular circumstances. Users should verify the accuracy and applicability of any Content before acting on it. MNDM does not guarantee, or make any warranty express or implied, that the Content is current, accurate, complete or reliable. MNDM is not responsible for any damage however caused, which results, directly or indirectly, from your use of the Content. MNDM assumes no legal liability or responsibility for the Content whatsoever. Links to Other Web Sites: This Content may contain links, to Web sites that are not operated by MNDM. Linked Web sites may not be available in French. MNDM neither endorses nor assumes any responsibility for the safety, accuracy or availability of linked Web sites or the information contained on them. The linked Web sites, their operation and content are the responsibility of the person or entity for which they were created or maintained (the “Owner”).
    [Show full text]