2-14 OB Vol 21#1 Apr 2003.Pdf

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

2-14 OB Vol 21#1 Apr 2003.Pdf 2 Articles The Sharp-tailed Grouse in Thunder Bay District Nicholas G. Escott The Sharp-tailed Grouse (Tympan­ North American continent. This sub­ uchus phasianellus) is known to be a species expanded its range eastward permanent resident in three widely and northward toward the end of separated areas of Ontario: the the 19th century, as it disappeared Hudson Bay Lowland; the Rainy from its original range due to inten­ River/Fort Frances and Dryden areas sive agricultural practices that in the northwest; and Sault Ste. Marie destroyed its native habitat (Roberts and Manitoulin Island (Lumsden 1936). It entered northwestern 1987). Even though the species is Ontario in the wake of settlement thought probably to range all across and land clearing, aided by construc­ northern Ontario (Peck and James tion of two railroads: the CPR line, 1983, Lumsden 1987), there are large north of Lake of the Woods; and the gaps in the distribution of records of Canadian Northern Railway, south this species there. Since 1993, howev­ of Lake of the Woods. The latter was er, we have found evidence of breed­ completed in 1902, and both brought ing populations of this grouse in this Canadian prairie wheat to the gap, north of Lake Superior. In this Lakehead. The grain cars of the time paper, I review the historical occur­ were leaky wooden boxcars that left rence of the Sharp-tailed Grouse, and a trail of grain across the forested the current status of this species, in wilderness (Miller 1963). Thunder Bay District. The other Sharp-tailed Grouse subspecies that has been recorded Subspecies of the Sharp-tailed in Ontario is the Northern Sharp­ Grouse tailed Grouse. It breeds across Two subspecies have been identified northern Canada and Alaska, and is in the province of Ontario (James darker than campestris, with more 1991): the Prairie Sharp-tailed dark markings ventrally, and less Grouse (T. p. campestris), and the tawny on the back (Roberts 1936). Northern Sharp-tailed Grouse (T. p. It inhabits open bogs and fens phasianellus). (Lumsden 1987). This race is known The Prairie Sharp-tailed Grouse for its occasional southward irrup­ is a bird of the brushy plains and tions, which are detailed in a subse­ aspen parklands of the centre of the quent section of this paper. ONTARIO BIRDS APRIL 2003 3 Lake Superior and northwest­ Lake Superior, campestris is found ern Ontario are located between the in scattered locations from historical ranges of the two sub­ Minnesota through northern species, but due to the northward Wisconsin and the Upper Peninsula range expansion of the one and the of Michigan, linking to some extent southward irruptions of the other, it the two Ontario populations. It has is an area where they have come disappeared from many U.S. states into contact with each other. It is due to habitat loss and hunting difficult to categorize all specimens pressure, and many populations still as to race, and there have been con­ may be declining (Connelly et a1. tradictory identifications made (for 1998). Several states have active example, see Isle Royale, below), so management programs to try to it is not entirely clear which sub­ preserve the Prairie Sharp-tailed species has been seen, or is being Grouse's habitat and population. presently recorded, in this area. The An isolated population of Royal Ontario Museum (ROM) has Sharp-tailed Grouse was discov­ about 40 specimens from northwest­ ered on Isle Royale in 1904, the first ern Ontario (Glenn Murphy, pers. to be confirmed in the state of comm.). All but one of the speci­ Michigan (Barrows 1912). They mens from Kenora District have were found in clearings around old been identified as phasianellus; mines and townsites. Specimens these are from more northerly loca­ taken from there in 1905 were ini­ tions in the Patricia portion. The tially identified as phasianellus by exception is a bird from Melgund H. C. Oberholser, but specimens Township, near Dryden, taken in the from there now are considered to fall of 1958 (the Dryden population be campestris (Wood 1951). A small is discussed below). All of the Rainy population is still present there River District specimens are (Brewer et al. 1991). campestris, except for two from Fort The Dryden population also is Frances taken in the fall of 1934. All isolated, inhabiting a large agricul­ 14 Thunder Bay District specimens, tural area along the CPR rail line most of which are from the Lake and Highway 17 from Dyment west Nipigon area, are phasianellus, to Vermilion Bay. They moved into except for three campestris from the Dryden area in the early part of Port Arthur (Port Arthur and Fort the century as the settlers cleared the William are now known as the city land, reaching their peak abundance of Thunder Bay) which are in the 1920s (Olsen 1960). Their described below. numbers diminished thereafter, and Campestris is the subspecies by 1959, only occasional single birds that presently occurs on Manitoulin or small flocks were seen, usually in Island and the north shore of Lake the late fall or winter. A concerted Huron (Lumsden 1987). South of search that year, however, found sev- VOLUME 21 NUMBER 1 4 eral resident flocks (Olsen 1960), and Thunder Bay area at the ROM repeat surveys in 1962 (McGillivray include two adult males collected 1963) and 1963 (McGillivray 1965) on 12 April 1933, 60 miles south­ found birds at 26 locations, including west of Port Arthur. The only nest eight dancing grounds. Four speci­ record was of a clutch of nine infer­ mens taken during the hunting sea­ tile eggs found by 1. Jacob in July son were identified as campestris by 1930, 60 miles southwest of Port H. Lumsden. The dancing grounds Arthur (Dear 1940). were all in cultivated fields: seven Sharp-tailed Grouse apparent­ stubble fields and one ploughed ly were common in clearings and field. Interestingly, some of the flocks cutovers on the Sibley Peninsula in 1962 were observed in cutover until about 1940. This information is areas adjacent to large "muskegs", based on an interview with James and helicopter surveys in 1963 Cross, a long-time resident of the flushed several flocks in "muskegs" area, recorded in the Sleeping (phasianellus habitat). Sharptails still Giant Provincial Park files (A. are present in the Dryden area, but Wormington, pers. comm.). If the we are not aware of any recent com­ observations of Mr. Cross are cor­ prehensive surveys. rect, these birds were most likely of the prairie subspecies. Historical Occurrence ofthe Sharp­ It is not clear whether the Prairie tailed Grouse in Thunder Bay Sharp-tailed Grouse was ever District numerous at the Lakehead, but by The Prairie Sharp-tailed Grouse 1940 they were "uncommon and very appeared in the southwestern part local" (Dear 1940) around Port of Thunder Bay District about the Arthur and Fort William (now turn of the 20th century (Fleming Thunder Bay). They persisted in low 1906). Its preferred habitat of numbers through the 1940s and brushy clearings, and fields with 1950s, with occasional sightings of scattered shrubs and trees, was a one or a few birds in the farmlands common landscape south and west surrounding the Lakehead. Dr. A. E. of the Lakehead in the first part of Allin, in his annual summary of the century, as settlers cleared the Lakehead birds for 1950, described forest for pastureland and farming. the species as being "very scarce" The first known record of the (Allin 1951). Reports ceased alto­ Sharp-tailed Grouse in Thunder gether about 1958. Since there have Bay District is a specimen, now at been no reliable sightings from the the ROM, that was collected by populated agricultural areas around George Atkinson at Port Arthur in Thunder Bay for over 40 years, it is November 1893; it has been identi­ assumed that the Prairie Sharp-tailed fied as the Prairie subspecies. Other Grouse now is extirpated from specimens of campestris from the Thunder Bay District. ONTARIO BIRDS APRIL 2003 5 The historical distribution of the ofOntario that this subspecies occurs Northern Sharp-tailed Grouse in as far south as Upsala and the north Thunder Bay District is not well doc­ shore of Lake Superior, although the umented. Thomas McIlwraith (1886) accompanying map showed a lack of listed its range as "from the northern Atlas records in this area. shore of Lake Superior...to Hudson's Bay territory and Alaska". Southward Irruptions of the John Macoun (1900) indicated a sim­ Northern Sharp-tailed Grouse ilar distribution, but went into more Periodically, the northern sub­ detail: "Since the building of the species appears in large numbers Canadian Pacific railway this bird south ofits normal range in Ontario. has been seen frequently on the line An irruption occurred in the fall of between Mattawa, on the Ottawa 1896, with birds being seen as far River, and Fort William, west ofLake south as Parry Sound and Muskoka Superior. It has been supposed to be Districts (Fleming 1906). the prairie species working east, but The best documented invasion its dark colour shows that it is the occurred 36 years later, in the fall northern bird." and winter of 1932-33, at which Where exactly these birds were time birds appeared as far south as seen, and during which years, is not Bracebridge, Gravenhurst, and clear, but by the 1930s, it was evi­ Bancroft (Snyder 1935, 1951). The dent that the normal range did not main flight was in northeastern extend as far south as Lake Ontario, south ofJames Bay, but the Superior. P.A.Taverner (1934) indi­ western edge of the irruption cated the range in Ontario to be reached Thunder Bay District at "from the vicinity of the Canadian Rossport on Lake Superior.
Recommended publications
  • Black Bay Peninsula Area
    THESE TERMS GOVERN YOUR USE OF THIS DOCUMENT Your use of this Ontario Geological Survey document (the “Content”) is governed by the terms set out on this page (“Terms of Use”). By downloading this Content, you (the “User”) have accepted, and have agreed to be bound by, the Terms of Use. Content: This Content is offered by the Province of Ontario’s Ministry of Northern Development and Mines (MNDM) as a public service, on an “as-is” basis. Recommendations and statements of opinion expressed in the Content are those of the author or authors and are not to be construed as statement of government policy. You are solely responsible for your use of the Content. You should not rely on the Content for legal advice nor as authoritative in your particular circumstances. Users should verify the accuracy and applicability of any Content before acting on it. MNDM does not guarantee, or make any warranty express or implied, that the Content is current, accurate, complete or reliable. MNDM is not responsible for any damage however caused, which results, directly or indirectly, from your use of the Content. MNDM assumes no legal liability or responsibility for the Content whatsoever. Links to Other Web Sites: This Content may contain links, to Web sites that are not operated by MNDM. Linked Web sites may not be available in French. MNDM neither endorses nor assumes any responsibility for the safety, accuracy or availability of linked Web sites or the information contained on them. The linked Web sites, their operation and content are the responsibility of the person or entity for which they were created or maintained (the “Owner”).
    [Show full text]
  • Lake Superior Study Area’S Mixed European-Indian Ancestry Community
    Historical Profile of the Lake Superior Study Area’s Mixed European-Indian Ancestry Community FINAL REPORT PREPARED BY FOR THE OFFICE OF THE FEDERAL INTERLOCUTOR SEPTEMBER 2007 Lake SuperiorMixed Ancestry Final Report Historical Profile of the Lake Superior Study Area’s Mixed European-Indian Ancestry Community TABLE OF CONTENTS Map: The proposed Lake Superior NMCA 3 Executive Summary 4 Methodology/Introduction 5 Comments on Terminology 6 Chapter 1: Study Region from the 17th Century to the 1840s 8 Ojibway Indians residing on the North Shore of Lake Superior 8 Europeans and the Study Area 9 Royal Proclamation of 1763 and the Quebec Act of 1774 12 Mention of Mixed-Ancestry people in the Study Region 15 Chapter 2: Aboriginal Pressure for a Treaty Relationship 25 Louis Agassiz and the Study Region, 1848 28 Treaty Exploratory Commission 28 Mica Bay, 1849 33 Vidal and Anderson Report 35 Government Instructions about Treaty Terms 37 Robinson Travels to Sault Ste. Marie 38 Request for Recognition of “Halfbreed” rights 40 Negotiation of the Robinson-Superior Treaty 40 Chapter 3: Post-Treaty Government Activity 44 “Halfbreed” inclusion in Robinson-Superior Treaty Annuity Paylists 44 Postal Service in the Study Region 46 Crown Activity between 1853 and 1867 46 Chapter 4: Settlement, Resource Development, and Government Administration within the Study Region, 1864-1901 51 Policing 53 Post Office and Railroad 55 Census Information and the Study Region 58 1871, 1881, and 1891 Censuses – Nipigon 59 1881 Census – Silver Islet 61 1901 Census – Nipigon Township (including Dorion), Rossport (including Pays Plat), and Schreiber 62 Small townships not included in early Censuses 63 Joan Holmes and Associates, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Movement, Resource Use, and Life History Strategies of Black Bay Walleye (Sander Vitreus)
    Movement, resource use, and life history strategies of Black Bay Walleye (Sander vitreus) A thesis presented to The Faculty of Graduate Studies of Lakehead University by GRAYDON MCKEE In partial fulfilment of requirements For the degree of Master of Science in Biology December 1, 2018 © Graydon McKee, 2018 Abstract Resource distribution across the landscape can drive movement strategy selection, from sedentary to highly mobile individuals. When paired with other forms of analysis, movement ecology can provide insight into the resource use, habitat selection, and life history strategies of fish. Acoustic telemetry has greatly improved our understanding of fish movement in the Laurentian Great Lakes, and Walleye (Sander vitreus), as a fish of great economic and social importance, have been intensively studied. While the degree of migration through the Great Lakes has been assessed, there remains a knowledge gap surrounding within-population variation in this movement. Black Bay once supported the largest commercial fishery for Walleye on Lake Superior, until its collapse in the late 1960s, and the recovery of this population has become a management priority on the lake. Management decisions have however, lacked precise information on the spatial extent, resource use, and life history of Black Bay Walleye. My thesis makes use of a two year acoustic telemetry study to assess Walleye movement within Black Bay and into the main body of Lake Superior. This was done with the goal of identifying Walleye movement patterns, and the influence of thermal-optical habitat and forage availability on these movement patterns. Black Bay Walleye have distinct migratory and resident groups, where migrators leave Black Bay during part of the year, and residents remain within Black Bay all year.
    [Show full text]
  • Physical, Assessment, Bedrock, Aggregate, Lake Superior
    Ontario Geological Survey Open File Report 6072 Physical Evaluation and Assessment of Bedrock Aggregate Resource Potential, North Shore of Lake Superior 2001 ONTARIO GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Open File Report 6072 Physical Evaluation and Assessment of Bedrock Aggregate Resource Potential, North Shore of Lake Superior by Jagger Hims Limited, Clayton Research Limited and Agritrans Limited 2001 Parts of this publication may be quoted if credit is given. It is recommended that reference to this publication be made in the following form: Jagger Hims Limited, Clayton Research Limited and Agritrans Limited 2001. Physical evaluation and assessment of bedrock aggregate resource potential, north shore of Lake Superior; Ontario Geological Survey, Open File Report 6072, 92p. e Queen’s Printer for Ontario, 2001 e Queen’s Printer for Ontario, 2001. Open File Reports of the Ontario Geological Survey are available for viewing at the Mines Library in Sudbury, at the Mines and Minerals Information Centre in Toronto, and at the regional Mines and Minerals office whose district includes the area covered by the report (see below). Copies can be purchased at Publication Sales and the office whose district includes the area covered by the report. Al- though a particular report may not be in stock at locations other than the Publication Sales office in Sudbury, they can generally be obtained within 3 working days. All telephone, fax, mail and e-mail orders should be directed to the Publica- tion Sales office in Sudbury. Use of VISA or MasterCard ensures the fastest possible service. Cheques or money orders should be made payable to the Minister of Finance.
    [Show full text]
  • Woodland Caribou Range Occupancy in Northwestern Ontario: Past and Present
    The Eight North American Caribou Workshop, Whitehorse, Yukon, Canada, 20-24 April, 1998. Woodland caribou range occupancy in northwestern Ontario: past and present G.D. Racey1 & T. Armstrong2 1 Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources, RR#1 25th Sideroad, Thunder Bay, Ont., Canada P7C 4T9 ([email protected]. on. ca). 2 Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources, 435 James Street S., Suite 221, Thunder Bay, Ont., Canada P7E 6S8. Abstract: A zone of continuous woodland caribou (Rangifer tarandm caribou) distribution is defined for northwestern Ontario. This zone establishes a benchmark for measuring the success of future management of habitat and conservation of populations. Inventory of key winter, summer and calving habitats reaffirms the concept of a dynamic mosaic of habi• tat tracts that supports caribou across the landscape. The historical range recession leading to this current distribution has been associated with resource development, fire and hunting activities over the past 150 years, and numerous attempts at conservation over the last 70 years. The decline was apparently phased according to several periods of devel• opment activity: i) early exploitation in the early to mid-1800s; ii) isolation and extirpation of southern populations due to rapid changes in forest use and access between 1890 and 1930; and iii) further loss of the southernmost herds due to forest harvesting of previously inaccessible areas since the 1950s. Lessons learned from history support current con• servation measures to manage caribou across broad landscapes, protect southern herds, maintain caribou habitat as part of continuous range, maintain large contiguous tracts of older forest and ensure connectivity between habitat compo• nents.
    [Show full text]
  • A Biodiversity Conservation Assessment for Lake Superior, Volume 2: Regional Unit Summaries
    Lake Superior Biodiversity Conservation Assessment: Vol. 2 Regional Unit Summaries Final Draft, June 2013 A Biodiversity Conservation Assessment for Lake Superior Volume 2: Regional Unit Summaries Prepared by the Superior Work Group of the Lake Superior Lakewide Action and Management Plan Final Draft: June 2013 Updated: September 2015 Lake Superior Biodiversity Conservation Assessment: Vol. 2 Regional Unit Summaries Final Draft, June 2013 Recommended Citation Lake Superior Lakewide Action and Management Plan (LAMP) - Superior Work Group. 2013. Lake Superior Biodiversity Conservation Assessment: Regional Unit Summaries. 282p. (Updated May 2015). Disclaimer This report reflects the best efforts of the preparers (Dan Kraus and Megan Ihrig) to accurately represent and interpret the available expertise and information on Lake Superior and the views and opinions of project participants. Every effort to ensure the accuracy of the information contained in this study has been taken. We welcome suggestions for improvements. Data Sources For a full list of the Data Sources and Methods used to create the Tables and Figures throughout this Regional Unit Summaries report please see Appendix A: Spatial Data Catalogue and Methods. Volume 1: Lakewide Assessment & Volume 2: Regional Summaries Please note that this report includes two volumes. Volume 1 includes an assessment of lakewide biodiversity target health and threats. Volume 2 contains regional summaries and maps that are presented in this document. It is recognized that many regions contain additional information and mapping on biodiversity and threats that could not be fully reflected in this report. Wherever possible, regional and local data and spatial information on biodiversity targets and threats has been noted in the text.
    [Show full text]
  • Black Bay Area
    THESE TERMS GOVERN YOUR USE OF THIS DOCUMENT Your use of this Ontario Geological Survey document (the “Content”) is governed by the terms set out on this page (“Terms of Use”). By downloading this Content, you (the “User”) have accepted, and have agreed to be bound by, the Terms of Use. Content: This Content is offered by the Province of Ontario’s Ministry of Northern Development and Mines (MNDM) as a public service, on an “as-is” basis. Recommendations and statements of opinion expressed in the Content are those of the author or authors and are not to be construed as statement of government policy. You are solely responsible for your use of the Content. You should not rely on the Content for legal advice nor as authoritative in your particular circumstances. Users should verify the accuracy and applicability of any Content before acting on it. MNDM does not guarantee, or make any warranty express or implied, that the Content is current, accurate, complete or reliable. MNDM is not responsible for any damage however caused, which results, directly or indirectly, from your use of the Content. MNDM assumes no legal liability or responsibility for the Content whatsoever. Links to Other Web Sites: This Content may contain links, to Web sites that are not operated by MNDM. Linked Web sites may not be available in French. MNDM neither endorses nor assumes any responsibility for the safety, accuracy or availability of linked Web sites or the information contained on them. The linked Web sites, their operation and content are the responsibility of the person or entity for which they were created or maintained (the “Owner”).
    [Show full text]
  • Lake Superior Regional Unit Summaries Draft Report
    Lake Superior Biodiversity Conservation Assessment REGIONAL UNIT SUMMARIES Draft information for review and comment Lake Superior Regional Unit Summaries - Draft Report Prepared for the Superior Work Group (SWG) of the Lake Superior Lakewide Action and Management Plan (LAMP) Draft for Review: February 22, 2013 Disclaimer This report reflects the best efforts of the preparers to accurately represent and interpret the available expertise and information on Lake Superior, and the views and opinions of project participants. Every effort to ensure the accuracy of the information contained in this study has been taken. We welcome expert input of additional information, and expect that new information will be added through consultation. Lake Superior Biodiversity Conservation Assessment REGIONAL UNIT SUMMARIES Draft information for review and comment 1. Goulais HEALTHY WATERS REPORT CARD OFFSHORE NA ISLANDS A NEARSHORE B COASTAL WETLANDS B INSHORE B COASTAL TERRESTRIAL A TRIBUTARIES & B OVERALL B+ WATERSHEDS Report card denotes general condition/health of each biodiversity target in the region based on condition/stress indices. See introduction to the regional summaries. A Ecologically desirable status; requires little intervention for Insert Picture Very maintenance Good B Within acceptable range of variation; may require some Insert Text Good intervention for maintenance. C Outside of the range of acceptable variation and requires Fair management. If unchecked, the biodiversity target may be vulnerable to serious degradation. D Allowing the biodiversity target to remain in this condition for Poor an extended period will make restoration or preventing extirpation practically impossible. Unknown Insufficient information. Summary/ Description The Goulais regional unit is located in Ontario on the eastern shore of Lake Superior, and extends from the international boundary at the St.
    [Show full text]
  • 7-Black Sturgeon BCA Regional Unit Background Chapter
    7. Black Sturgeon HEALTHY WATERS REPORT CARD OFFSHORE NA ISLANDS A NEARSHORE C COASTAL WETLANDS A- EMBAYMENTS & B COASTAL TERRESTRIAL A+ INSHORE TRIBUTARIES & A OVERALL A- WATERSHEDS Report card denotes general condition/health of each biodiversity target in the region based on condition/stress indices. See introduction to the regional summaries. A Ecologically desirable status; requires little intervention for Very maintenance Good B Within acceptable range of variation; may require some Good intervention for maintenance. C Outside of the range of acceptable variation and requires Fair management. If unchecked, the biodiversity target may be vulnerable to serious degradation. D Allowing the biodiversity target to remain in this condition for Poor an extended period will make restoration or preventing extirpation practically impossible. Unknown Insufficient information. The Black Sturgeon River, looking towards the river mouth. Photo credit: Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources Summary/ Description The Black Sturgeon regional unit is located on the northern shore of Lake Superior. This regional unit is 6,333 km2 in size, including the associated nearshore waters. The Black Sturgeon regional unit extends from near Thunder Bay in the west, to near the communities of Red Rock and Nipigon in the east. Communities in this regional unit include Red Rock, Red Rock Indian Band (Lake Helen First Nation), the Township of Shuniah, and the Township of Dorion. This regional unit includes Black Bay, a portion of Thunder Bay, and the Sibley and Black Bay Peninsulas. A number of provincial parks, nature reserves and conservation areas are located in this regional unit. The Lakehead Region Conservation Authority’s area of jurisdiction covers eight municipalities, including municipalities in the Black Sturgeon and Arrow and Dog regional units.
    [Show full text]
  • Prince Arthur's Landing
    ENVIRENVIRONMENTONMENTALAL ASSESSMENTASSESSMENT FORF OR THETHE MARMARATHONTHON PGM-CPGM-Cu PRPROJECTOJECT AT MARMARATHON,THON, ONTONTARIOARIO STILLWATERSTILLWATER CANADACANADA INC.INC. MARATHONMARATHON PGM-CuPGM-Cu PROJECTPROJECT SUPPORTINGSUPPORTING INFORMATIONINFORMATION DOCUMENTDOCUMENT No.No. 2626 - MARATHONMARATHON PGM-CuPGM-Cu PROJECTPROJECT - ASSESSMENTASSESSMENT OFOF IMPACTSIMPACTS ONON WOODLANDWOODLAND CARIBOUCARIBOU PreparedPrepared by:by: NorthernNorthern BBioscienceioscience 363363 VanVan HorneHorne StreetStreet ThunderThunder BBay,ay, OONN P7AP7A 3G33G3 MARATHON PLATINUM GROUP METALS AND COPPER MINE PROJECT Woodland Caribou Impact Assessment July 19, 2012 Prepared for: Stillwater Canada Inc. Prepared by: Dr. Robert F. Foster Allan G. Harris Marathon PGM-Cu Project Caribou EIS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Forest-dwelling woodland caribou (Rangifer tarandus caribou) are listed as Threatened under both federal and provincial species at risk legislation. They are the focus of a provincial conservation plan. Woodland caribou range and abundance in Ontario have declined, mainly due to anthropogenic disturbance and associated changes in alternate prey and predator abundance. Across the north shore of Lake Superior, they are now almost entirely restricted to isolated populations in protected areas. The largest populations, approximately 100 and 400 individuals respectively, are found within Slate Islands and Michipicoten Island provincial parks, both of which lack large predators. Pukaskwa National Parks’ population has declined from approximately 30 caribou in the 1970s to an estimated four currently, largely due to predation by wolves and possibly black bears. An estimated 8 to 15 caribou still use Pic Island in Neys Provincial Park and adjacent mainland at least part of the year, down from approximately 80 in the 1970s. The OMNR has designated a 10-km wide strip along the north shore of Lake Superior as the “Lake Superior Coastal Range”.
    [Show full text]
  • Is Ruggedness a Key Habitat Feature for Woodland Caribou Along the Lake Superior Coast?
    Lakehead University Knowledge Commons,http://knowledgecommons.lakeheadu.ca Electronic Theses and Dissertations Undergraduate theses 2018 Is Ruggedness a Key Habitat Feature for Woodland Caribou Along the Lake Superior Coast? McClinchey, Jack http://knowledgecommons.lakeheadu.ca/handle/2453/4423 Downloaded from Lakehead University, KnowledgeCommons IS RUGGEDNESS A KEY HABITAT FEATURE FOR WOODLAND CARIBOU ALONG THE LAKE SUPERIOR COAST? by Jack McClinchey Source: Roberta Bondar, 2001 FACULTY OF NATURAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT LAKEHEAD UNIVERSITY THUNDER BAY, ONTARIO April 20th, 2018 IS RUGGEDNESS A KEY HABITAT FEATURE FOR WOODLAND CARIBOU ALONG THE LAKE SUPERIOR COAST? by Jack McClinchey An undergraduate thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Honours Bachelor of Science in Forestry Faculty of Natural Resources Management Lakehead University April 20th, 2018 Major Advisor Second Reader ii LIBRARY RIGHTS STATEMENT In presenting this thesis in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the HBScF degree at Lakehead University in Thunder Bay, I agree that the University will make it freely available for inspection. This thesis is made available by my authority solely for the purpose of private study and research and may not be copied or reproduced in whole or in part (except as permitted by the Copyright Laws) without my written authority. Signature: Date: iii A CAUTION TO THE READER This HBSCF thesis has been through a semi-formal process of review and comment by at least two faculty members. It is made available on loan by the Faculty of Natural Resources Management for the purpose of advancing the practice of professional and scientific forestry. The reader should be aware that the opinions and conclusions expressed in this document are those of the student and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the thesis supervisor, the faculty, or Lakehead University.
    [Show full text]
  • Black B. Pen. and Vicinity: Edward I. Sheet
    THESE TERMS GOVERN YOUR USE OF THIS DOCUMENT Your use of this Ontario Geological Survey document (the “Content”) is governed by the terms set out on this page (“Terms of Use”). By downloading this Content, you (the “User”) have accepted, and have agreed to be bound by, the Terms of Use. Content: This Content is offered by the Province of Ontario’s Ministry of Northern Development and Mines (MNDM) as a public service, on an “as-is” basis. Recommendations and statements of opinion expressed in the Content are those of the author or authors and are not to be construed as statement of government policy. You are solely responsible for your use of the Content. You should not rely on the Content for legal advice nor as authoritative in your particular circumstances. Users should verify the accuracy and applicability of any Content before acting on it. MNDM does not guarantee, or make any warranty express or implied, that the Content is current, accurate, complete or reliable. MNDM is not responsible for any damage however caused, which results, directly or indirectly, from your use of the Content. MNDM assumes no legal liability or responsibility for the Content whatsoever. Links to Other Web Sites: This Content may contain links, to Web sites that are not operated by MNDM. Linked Web sites may not be available in French. MNDM neither endorses nor assumes any responsibility for the safety, accuracy or availability of linked Web sites or the information contained on them. The linked Web sites, their operation and content are the responsibility of the person or entity for which they were created or maintained (the “Owner”).
    [Show full text]