Dod Depot-Level Reparable Supply Chain Management Process Effectiveness and Opportunities for Improvement

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Dod Depot-Level Reparable Supply Chain Management Process Effectiveness and Opportunities for Improvement CHILDREN AND FAMILIES The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that EDUCATION AND THE ARTS helps improve policy and decisionmaking through ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT research and analysis. HEALTH AND HEALTH CARE This electronic document was made available from INFRASTRUCTURE AND www.rand.org as a public service of the RAND TRANSPORTATION Corporation. INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS LAW AND BUSINESS NATIONAL SECURITY Skip all front matter: Jump to Page 16 POPULATION AND AGING PUBLIC SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY Support RAND Purchase this document TERRORISM AND HOMELAND SECURITY Browse Reports & Bookstore Make a charitable contribution For More Information Visit RAND at www.rand.org Explore the RAND National Defense Research Institute View document details Limited Electronic Distribution Rights This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law as indicated in a notice appearing later in this work. This electronic representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for non-commercial use only. Unauthorized posting of RAND electronic documents to a non-RAND website is prohibited. RAND electronic documents are protected under copyright law. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of our research documents for commercial use. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please see RAND Permissions. This report is part of the RAND Corporation research report series. RAND reports present research findings and objective analysis that address the challenges facing the public and private sectors. All RAND reports undergo rigorous peer review to ensure high standards for re- search quality and objectivity. DoD Depot-Level Reparable Supply Chain Management Process Effectiveness and Opportunities for Improvement Eric Peltz, Marygail K. Brauner, Edward G. Keating, Evan Saltzman, Daniel Tremblay, Patricia Boren C O R P O R A T I O N NATIONAL DEFENSE RESEARCH INSTITUTE DoD Depot-Level Reparable Supply Chain Management Process Effectiveness and Opportunities for Improvement Eric Peltz, Marygail K. Brauner, Edward G. Keating, Evan Saltzman, Daniel Tremblay, Patricia Boren Prepared for the Office of the Secretary of Defense Approved for public release; distribution unlimited The research described in this report was prepared for the Office of the Secretary of Defense (OSD). The research was conducted within the RAND National Defense Research Institute, a federally funded research and development center sponsored by OSD, the Joint Staff, the Unified Combatant Commands, the Navy, the Marine Corps, the defense agencies, and the defense Intelligence Community under Contract W91WAW-12-C-0030. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data is available for this publication. ISBN: 978-0-8330-8495-8 The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND’s publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors. Support RAND—make a tax-deductible charitable contribution at www.rand.org/giving/contribute.html R® is a registered trademark Cover: U.S. Navy photo by Petty Officer 1st Class David McKee © Copyright 2014 RAND Corporation This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of RAND documents to a non-RAND website is prohibited. RAND documents are protected under copyright law. Permission is given to duplicate this document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of our research documents for commercial use. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please see the RAND permissions page (www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.html). RAND OFFICES SANTA MONICA, CA • WASHINGTON, DC PITTSBURGH, PA • NEW ORLEANS, LA • JACKSON, MS • BOSTON, MA CAMBRIDGE, UK • BRUSSELS, BE www.rand.org Preface The RAND National Defense Research Institute (NDRI) examined Department of Defense (DoD) depot-level reparable (DLR) supply chain management to assess how it could be improved to enhance cus- tomer support and reduce costs. Our research team employed com- plementary approaches, including analysis of DLR flow and inventory data, interviews and site visits, reviews of service documentation, a lit- erature review, and case studies of specific DLRs. From these multiple methods, we distilled the most common reasons for apparent inventory “excess” and customer support shortfalls, and we identified associated process improvement opportunities. We did not find any large, “silver bullet” solutions, concluding that DLRs are managed relatively well by the services. However, we did find a number of modest opportunities for improving DLR supply chain management. The first, and likely largest, is improving parts sup- portability, including taking a total cost perspective that encompasses supply and maintenance when planning inventory in support of depot production. A second opportunity is to shift the Army more toward pull production. A third is to reduce lead times for all types of contracts affecting DLR supply chain management. And a fourth is to better account for all resource lead times in planning DLR production and anticipatable shifts in procurement and repair needs. These enhance- ments would all improve customer support, with better parts support likely reducing maintenance costs and pull production reducing the buildup of inventory. Additional cost-saving opportunities are more limited because what on the surface appears to be substantial inventory iii iv DoD Depot-Level Reparable Supply Chain Management excess and high disposals of assets is actually a reflection of the fact that DLRs are durable assets very much like weapon systems and other end items. We found that most DLRs have very low condemnation rates. So when they are replaced by upgraded versions or weapon systems are phased out, demands disappear but the assets remain, leading first to “excess” inventory and then disposals. This is a cost of doing business. Most DLRs get repaired many times before they become obsolete, with each asset purchased for inventory being used many times. This project was sponsored by the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Logistics and Materiel Readiness. It should be of interest to logisti- cians across the DoD, financial managers, Congress, and other stake- holders interested in understanding DoD inventory management and ensuring it is executed as effectively as possible. The research was con- ducted by the Acquisition and Technology Policy Center of the RAND National Defense Research Institute (NDRI). NDRI is a federally funded research and development center sponsored by the Office of the Secretary of Defense, the Joint Staff, the Unified Combatant Com- mands, the Navy, the Marine Corps, the defense agencies, and the defense Intelligence Community. For more information on the RAND Acquisition and Technology Policy Center, see http://www.rand.org/ nsrd/ndri/centers/atp.html or contact the director (contact information is provided on the web page). Contents Preface ............................................................................. iii Figures ............................................................................. ix Tables .............................................................................. xi Summary .........................................................................xiii Acknowledgments ........................................................... xxxiii Abbreviations .................................................................. xxxv CHaptER ONE Introduction ....................................................................... 1 The Role of Depot-Level Reparables in Sustainment .......................... 1 DLR Investments, Flows, and Customer Support ............................. 2 Project Overview and Objectives ................................................. 7 Approach ............................................................................ 9 Organization of This Report .....................................................10 CHaptER TWO Findings from Item-Level Case Studies .....................................13 Large Disposals of Unserviceable Assets: A Cost of Doing Business Resulting from DLR Phase-Outs and Low Washout Rates .............21 Other Less Common Drivers of Excess DLR Inventory .................... 26 Summary of Case-Study Findings for Shortages ............................. 28 Implications for Measuring Inventory Turns to Monitor Inventory Management Efficiency .................................................... 30 CHaptER THREE Parts Supportability/Taking a Total-Cost Perspective ...................37 v vi DoD Depot-Level Reparable Supply Chain Management Demand History Adjustments ..................................................39 Collaborative Planning ...........................................................39 Accounting for the Maintenance Costs from Parts Shortages ............. 42 Parts Supportability Metrics and Performance-Based Agreements ........ 43 Example Improvement .......................................................... 48 CHaptER FOUR Adoption of Pull Production ..................................................51 Production System Profiles .......................................................51 The Effects of Push Production ................................................. 56 Balancing
Recommended publications
  • AT&L Workforce—Key Leadership Changes
    AT&L Workforce—Key Leadership Changes Esper Would Continue Pentagon Emphasis on Readiness, Partnerships, Reform DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE NEWS (JULY 16, 2019) David Vergun Army Secretary Dr. Mark T. Esper told senators that he would continue to prioritize training, modernization, build- ing alliances and partnerships, and reforming the Pentagon if he’s confirmed to serve as secretary of defense. Esper, President Donald J. Trump’s nominee to assume the Pentagon’s top post, testified at his Senate Armed Services Committee confirmation hearing. The committee will make a recommendation to the full Senate for its vote on whether to confirm Esper for the job. In his opening statement, Esper noted the growing threats posed by great power competitors such as China and Rus- sia and told the panel that these threats warrant a refocus to training, research and development, and equipping for Army Secretary Dr. Mark Esper high-intensity conflict, particularly in the space and cyber domains. DoD photo At the same time, he said, the military must be prepared considerations last month. The president then appointed to respond to regional threats posed by Iran, North Korea, Esper to serve as acting defense secretary. and terrorist groups around the world. ‘’Our adversaries must see diplomacy as their best option, because war with Yesterday, the Senate received the president’s formal nomi- the United States will force them to bear enormous costs,’’ nation of Esper to be secretary of defense. At that time, by he said. law, Esper ceased to serve as acting defense secretary, and his sole title became secretary of the Army.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessment of the Air Force Materiel Command Reorganization Report for Congress
    CHILDREN AND FAMILIES The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and EDUCATION AND THE ARTS decisionmaking through research and analysis. ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT HEALTH AND HEALTH CARE This electronic document was made available from www.rand.org as a public service INFRASTRUCTURE AND of the RAND Corporation. TRANSPORTATION INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS LAW AND BUSINESS Skip all front matter: Jump to Page 16 NATIONAL SECURITY POPULATION AND AGING PUBLIC SAFETY Support RAND SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY Purchase this document TERRORISM AND Browse Reports & Bookstore HOMELAND SECURITY Make a charitable contribution For More Information Visit RAND at www.rand.org Explore RAND Project AIR FORCE View document details Limited Electronic Distribution Rights This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law as indicated in a notice appearing later in this work. This electronic representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for non- commercial use only. Unauthorized posting of RAND electronic documents to a non-RAND website is prohibited. RAND electronic documents are protected under copyright law. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of our research documents for commercial use. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please see RAND Permissions. This report is part of the RAND Corporation research report series. RAND reports present research findings and objective analysis that address the challenges facing the public and private sectors. All RAND reports undergo rigorous peer review to ensure high standards for research quality and objectivity. Research Report Assessment of the Air Force Materiel Command Reorganization Report for Congress Don Snyder, Bernard Fox, Kristin F.
    [Show full text]
  • Digital Download (PDF)
    Q&A: JCS Vice Roles and Missions Reboot? 48| Pilot Training 44| Cost-Per-E ect Calculus 60 Chairman Gen. John Hyten 14 THE NEW ARCTIC STRATEGY Competition Intensifies in a Critical Region |52 September 2020 $8 Published by the Air Force Association THOSE BORN TO FLY LIVE TO WALK AWAY ACES 5®: Proven and ready Protecting aircrew is our mission. It’s why our ACES 5® ejection seat is the world’s only production seat proven to meet the exacting standards of MIL-HDBK-516C. Innovative technologies and consistent test results make ACES 5 the most advanced protection for your aircrew. Plus, we leverage 40 years of investment to keep your life-cycle costs at their lowest. ACES 5: Fielded and available today. The only ejection seat made in the United States. collinsaerospace.com/aces5 © 2020 Collins Aerospace CA_8338 Aces_5_ProvenReady_AirForceMagazine.indd 1 8/3/20 8:43 AM Client: Collins Aerospace - Missions Systems Ad Title: Aces 5 - Eject - Proven and Ready Filepath: /Volumes/GoogleDrive/Shared drives/Collins Aerospace 2020/_Collins Aerospace Ads/_Mission Systems/ACES 5_Ads/4c Ads/ Eject_Proven and ready/CA_8338 Aces_5_ProvenReady_AirForceMagazine.indd Publication: Air Force Magazine - September Trim: 8.125” x 10.875” • Bleed: 8.375” x 11.125” • Live: 7.375” x 10.125” STAFF Publisher September 2020. Vol. 103, No. 9 Bruce A. Wright Editor in Chief Tobias Naegele Managing Editor Juliette Kelsey Chagnon Editorial Director John A. Tirpak News Editor Amy McCullough Assistant Managing Editor Chequita Wood Senior Designer Dashton Parham Pentagon Editor Brian W. Everstine Master Sgt. Christopher Boitz Sgt. Christopher Master Digital Platforms Editor DEPARTMENTS FEATURES T-38C Talons Jennifer-Leigh begin to break 2 Editorial: Seize 14 Q&A: The Joint Focus Oprihory the High Ground away from an echelon for- Senior Editor By Tobias Naegele Gen.
    [Show full text]
  • USAF Leadership
    Photochart of USAF Leadership Office of the Secretary of the Air Force Assistant Secretary of Assistant Secretary of Assistant Secretary of Assistant Secretary of the the Air Force the Air Force (Financial the Air Force (Installa- Air Force (Manpower & (Acquisition) Management & tions, Environment, & Reserve Affairs) William A. LaPlante Comptroller) Energy) (vacant) Lisa S. Disbrow Miranda A. A. Ballentine Secretary of the Air Force Deborah Lee James Deputy Undersecretary of Deputy Undersecretary of Auditor General General Counsel the Air Force (International the Air Force (Space) Daniel F. McMillin Gordon O. Tanner Affairs) Winston Beauchamp Heidi H. Grant Undersecretary of the Air Force Lisa S. Disbrow (acting) Inspector General Chief, Information Director, Legislative Director, Public Affairs Lt. Gen. Gregory A. Dominance & Liaison Brig. Gen. Kathleen A. Biscone Chief Information Officer Maj. Gen. Thomas Cook Lt. Gen. William J. Bender Bergeson Director, Small Administrative Assistant to the Business Programs Secretary of the Air Force Mark S. Teskey Patricia J. Zarodkiewicz 80 AIR FORCE Magazine / September 2015 Photochart of An Air Force Magazine Directory By Chequita Wood, Media Research Editor As of Aug. 14, 2015 The United States Air Force Air Staff Assistant Vice Chief of Chief Master Sergeant Air Force Historian Judge Advocate Staff of the Air Force Walt Grudzinskas General Lt. Gen. John W. CMSAF James A. Cody Lt. Gen. Christopher F. Hesterman III Burne Chief of Staff Gen. Mark A. Welsh III Surgeon General Chairman, Scientific Chief of Chaplains Chief of Safety Lt. Gen. Mark A. Ediger Advisory Board Maj. Gen. (sel.) Dondi E. Maj. Gen. Andrew M. Werner J. A.
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. Phase 4 Trial Discovery Response Page 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
    1 IGNACIA S. MORENO, Assistant Attorney General Environment & Natural Resources Division EXEMPT FROM FILING FEES 2 UNDER GOVERNMENT CODE 3 §6103 LEE LEININGER, Trial Attorney 4 JAMES DUBOIS, Trial Attorney United States Department of Justice 5 Environment and Natural Resources Division th 6 999 18 Street, South Terrace, Suite 370 Denver, Colorado, 80202 7 Tel: (303) 844-1464 Fax: (303) 844-1350 8 Email: [email protected] 9 Email: [email protected] 10 Attorneys for Plaintiff United States of America 11 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 12 FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES – CENTRAL DISTRICT 13 Coordination Proceeding Judicial Council Coordination 14 Special Title (Rule 1550 (b)), Proceeding No. 4408 15 [Assigned to the Honorable Jack Komar, Judge 16 ANTELOPE VALLEY GROUNDWATER Santa Clara County Superior Court, Dept. 17] 17 CASES Santa Clara Court Case No. 1-05-CV-049053 18 UNITED STATES’ REVISED RESPONSE 19 TO COURT’S DISCOVERY ORDER FOR 20 PHASE 4 TRIAL 21 22 Cross-Defendant United States of America respectfully submits this revised response to 23 24 the December 12, 2012 Discovery Order for Phase 4 Trial. 25 26 I. FOR ALL PARTIES CLAIMING AN OVERLYING GROUNDWATER RIGHT, INCLUDING PUBLIC WATER AND OTHER PRODUCERS WHO ALSO CLAIM A 27 PRESCRIPTIVE RIGHT UNDER CATEGORY II BELOW 28 U.S. Phase 4 Trial Discovery Response Page 1 1 1. For each parcel of real property the responding party owns or occupies or otherwise controls in the Antelope Valley Adjudication Area, please state with particularity the 2 following information: 3 (A) The Kern County Treasurer Tax Collector's "Assessor Tax Number" or the 4 Los Angeles County Office of the Assessor "Assessor's Identification Number" of the parcel.
    [Show full text]
  • Portable Automated Test Station: Using Engineering- Design
    TEST AND DIAGNOSTICS The PATS-70’s modular design has been developed to meet Portable Automated the functionality requirements, environmental requirements, and additional expansion capabilities. The PATS-70 replaces more than a dozen pieces of obsolete and irreparable flightline sup- Test Station: port equipment. It has been organically developed using COTS components and industry standard software. An engineering- design partnership was formed between the Air Force and Using Engineering- Marvin Test Solutions1 to facilitate this development and to help the program meet its objective on-time, and on-budget. This led to the selection of the Marvin PXI-based, ultra-rugged MTS-207 Design Partnerships platform, laying the ground work for PATS-70 instrumentation selections. In addition, the PATS-70 provides flexibility over other test to Replace Obsolete sets since the software architecture was uniquely designed for ease of adding additional Test Program Sets (TPSs) to support the war fighter’s needs. Moreover, the PATS-70 hardware has Test Systems spare capacity to add additional COTS PXI components to sup- port future TPS development. With thousands of PXI cards avail- Benjamin Chase, Hill Air Force Base able today, this provides the Air Force the necessary flexibility to tackle a multitude of test requirements and applications. The Abstract. The Air Force A-10C attack aircraft is currently experiencing obsoles- PATS-70 has also been selected as the test platform for a new cence issues with its legacy support equipment. The Portable Automated Test A-10 weapons systems maintenance capability, merging the Station Model 70 (PATS-70) replaces more than a dozen pieces of obsolete and capability of eight legacy test sets along with additional flightline irreparable flightline support equipment.
    [Show full text]
  • Hill Air Force Base in the 2010S
    80 YEARS OF EXCELLENCE HILL AIR FORCE BASE IN THE 2010S March 26, 2010 July 16, 2010 March 24, 2011 May 26, 2011 October 2011 January 11, 2012 July 2012 The Ogden Air Logistics Center’s (OO-ALC) 309th Maintenance Assigned to the 388th Fighter Wing since the Vietnam The 309th Maintenance Wing formally assumed TSgt Kristoffer Solesbee, from the 775th Civil Engineering The 309th Aerospace Maintenance and Ogden Air Logistics Center and 309th Maintenance Air Force Materiel Command (AFMC) restructured Wing celebrated the completion of the Common Configuration conflict, the 34th Fighter Squadron inactivated as part depot-level, airframe maintenance work for the T-38 Squadron Explosive Ordnance Disposal Flight, died as Regeneration Group (AMARG) eliminated Wing senior leadership held a ribbon-cutting ceremony its Centers across the command. This included the Implementation Program (CCIP) with a rollout ceremony of the Air Force’s move to draw down F-16 forces in Talon. The 571st Aircraft Maintenance Squadron at a result of an Improvised Explosive Devise (IED) attack the first of the 39 B-52Gs scheduled for for the second phase of Building 674, the new F-22 activation of the Air Force Sustainment Center (AFSC), for the last aircraft to receive this upgrade. CCIP improved preparation for the F-35 spin-up. Randolph AFB, Texas, assumed the workload from in Kandahar Province, Afghanistan, while deployed in destruction to meet New Strategic Arms heavy maintenance facility and composite back shop. the new headquarters of the re-designated Ogden Air the F-16’s combat effectiveness and made maintenance and Lear Siegler (LSI) contractors.
    [Show full text]
  • Program Guide Sponsored By
    AIR FORCE ASSOCIATION Program Guide sponsored by EXPANDING THE COMPETITIVE EDGE September 16-18, 2019 | National Harbor, MD | AFA.org Cover outer gatefold (in PDF only, this page intentionally left blank) AIR FORCE ASSOCIATION It takes collaboration and innovation to win in the multi-domain battlespace Program Guide sponsored by of the future. In the battlespace of tomorrow, success will depend on synchronized networks that rapidly EXPANDING integrate data sources and weapon systems across domains. Working together to outpace, disrupt and paralyze your adversary, multi-domain superiority is closer than you think. THE COMPETITIVE EDGE Learn more at lockheedmartin.com. September 16-18, 2019 | National Harbor, MD | AFA.org © 2019 Lockheed Martin Corporation Live: N/A Trim: W: 7.9375in H: 10.875in Job Number: FG18-23208_044b Bleed: H: .125in all sides Designer: Kevin Gray Publication: AFA Program Guide Gutter: None Communicator: Ryan Alford Visual: F-35C Resolution: 300 DPI Due Date: 7/22/19 Country: USA Density: 300 Color Space: CMYK Lethal. Survivable. Connected. The U.S. Air Force’s combat proven F-35A is the most lethal, survivable and connected fighter in the world. With stealth, advanced sensors, and networked data links, the F-35 can go where no fighter can go, see what no fighter can see and share unprecedented information with the joint, multi-domain fighting force. Supersonic speed. Fighter agility. Increased range. Extended mission persistence. Flexible weapons capacity. From the highest-end, sensitive missions to permissive battlespace. On the first day to the last. The F-35 gives the U.S. Air Force a decisive advantage, ensuring our men and women in uniform can execute their mission and return home safe every time, no matter the threat.
    [Show full text]
  • Arnold Air Force Base
    PRSRT STD US POSTAGE PAID TULLAHOMA TN Vol. 66, No. 11 Arnold AFB, Tenn. PERMIT NO. 29 June 3, 2019 Bunch assumes command of AFMC By Air Force Materiel Command ees and manages nearly $60 billion and Mission Support Center provides Public Affairs annually. The command oversees combat support impacting installa- eight Air Force installations nation- tion operations and Airmen readiness WRIGHT-PATTERSON AIR wide and is charged with developing, across the Air Force. FORCE BASE, Ohio – Gen. Arnold acquiring, modernizing and sustain- Bunch takes the banner of AFMC W. Bunch, Jr. assumed command of ing Air Force weapon systems across as the new National Defense Strategy the Air Force Materiel Command at their life cycle. focuses each of the services on inno- Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, The AFMC portfolio ranges from vation, cost-effective modernization Ohio, during a ceremony May 31, at basic and applied scientific research, and enhancing lethality to address the the National Museum of the U.S. Air to Air Force uniforms, to information challenge of great power competition. Force. systems and software, to manned and He is a graduate of the U.S. Air He previously served as Military unmanned aircraft, and directed en- Force Academy and the U.S. Air Deputy, Office of the Assistant Secre- ergy weapons. Force Test Pilot School. The B-52 tary of the Air Force for Acquisition, The command includes six centers, and B-2 bombers are among the many Technology and Logistics at the Pen- including acquisition product centers, aircraft he has flown. tagon, Washington, D.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Eagle Flag: Testing Air Force Expeditionary Combat Support Capablilities Pages 8-12
    AIRLIFT/TANKER QUARTERLY Volume 21 • Number 2 • Spring 2013 Eagle Flag: Testing Air Force Expeditionary Combat Support Capablilities Pages 8-12 Air Mobility Heritage & Heroes Pages 14-16 CONTENTS… Association News Chairman’s Comments ........................................................................2 President’s Message ...............................................................................3 Secretary’s Notes ...................................................................................3 Association Round-Up .......................................................................4-7 AIRLIFT/TANKER QUARTERLY Volume 21 • Number 2 • Spring 2013 Airlift/Tanker Quarterly is published four times a year by the Airlift/Tanker Association, 9312 Convento Terrace, Fairfax, Virginia 22031. Postage paid at Belleville, Illinois. Cover Story Subscription rate: $40.00 per year. Change of address requires four weeks notice. The Airlift/Tanker Association is a non-profit Eagle Flag: professional organization dedicated to providing a forum for people interested in improving the Testing Air Force Expeditionary Combat Support Capablilities .............8-12 capability of U.S. air mobility forces. Membership in the Airlift/Tanker Association is $40 annually or $110 for three years. Full-time student membership is $15 per year. Life membership is $500. Industry Partner membership includes five individual memberships and is $1500 per year. Membership dues include a subscription to Airlift/ Tanker Quarterly, and are subject to change. Airlift/Tanker
    [Show full text]
  • Test Capabilities Guide
    Arnold Engineering Development Complex TEST CAPABILITIES GUIDE Like us on Facebook at @ArnoldAirForceBase Arnold Engineering Development Complex Arnold AFB, TN 37389 www.arnold.af.mil An Air Force Test Center Test Complex APPROVED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE; DISTRIBUTION IS UNLIMITED. 1954 The 1980s October 2008 AEDC THROUGH THE YEARS • The first engine, a J47 turbojet for the B-47 bomber, is • Air Force awards $26.1 million contract to produce the tested at a simulated altitude of 30,000 feet. 1982 Space Threat Assessment Testbed ground test capability at • Use of Computational Fluid Dynamics begins. AEDC. The 1940s April 1954 • The first issue of High Mach, the center’s employee October 1984 March 2009 November 1944 newspaper, is published. • Construction is completed on the Aeropropulsion Systems • The 100th rocket motor is fired in J-6. • Gen. Henry “Hap” Arnold directs formation of the Scientific Test Facility, the world’s largest jet engine test facility. Advisory Group. March 1957 • Escape velocity, the speed needed to leave Earth’s gravity, November 1985 The 2010s June 1945 is reached in the Gas Dynamics Facility’s Hotshot 2 tunnel. • An explosion during a test destroys the J-5 Rocket Test • Trans-Atlantic Memo proposes the Air Engineering Facility. The facility is rebuilt a year later, ahead of schedule. 2016 Development Center. November 1957 • Control of The McKinley Climatic Laboratory at Eglin AFB, • A jet engine is tested in the new Propulsion Wind Tunnel, Florida, is realigned from the 96th Test Wing to AEDC. December 1945 validating the larger transonic wind tunnel design. The 1990s • The 96th Test Group and 796th Test Support Squadron at • Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Office of Personnel Management
    Vol. 77 Friday, No. 145 July 27, 2012 Part II Office of Personnel Management 2011 Career Reserved Senior Executive Positions; Notice VerDate Mar<15>2010 15:32 Jul 26, 2012 Jkt 226001 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4717 Sfmt 4717 E:\FR\FM\27JYN2.SGM 27JYN2 erowe on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES2 44314 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 145 / Friday, July 27, 2012 / Notices OFFICE OF PERSONNEL this gives notice of all positions in the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Below is a MANAGEMENT Senior Executive Service (SES) that list of titles of SES positions that were were career reserved during calendar career reserved at any time during 2011 Career Reserved Senior year 2011. calendar year 2011, regardless of Executive Positions whether those positions were still career FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: reserved as of December 31, 2011. AGENCY: U.S. Office of Personnel Phyllis Proctor, Senior Executive Section 3132(b)(4) of title 5, United Management (OPM). Resources Services, Executive Resources States Code, requires that the head of ACTION: Notice. and Employee Development, Employee each agency publish such lists by March Services, 202–606–2246, 1 of the following year. The Office of SUMMARY: As required by section [email protected]. Personnel Management is publishing a 3132(b)(4) of title 5, United States Code, consolidated list for all agencies. Agency Organization Title ADMINISTRATIVE CONFERENCE OF THE Research Office ............................................... Research Director. UNITED STATES. General Counsel. Administrative Conference of the United General Counsel. States. Executive Director. ADVISORY COUNCIL ON HISTORIC PRES- Office of the Executive Director ....................... Executive Director. ERVATION. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE .................. Office of Communications ...............................
    [Show full text]