KR0000044 KAERI/RR-1896/98
7| # 7H Development of Advanced Reactor Technology
Development of System Integration Technology for Integral" Reactor
71
31/30 KAERI/RR-1896/98
7| ft 7R-V Development of Advanced Reactor Technology
Development of System Integration Technology for Integral Reactor
7} 1999. 3.
xi-
A S. o| CD Ot
I.
n
330 SMART
7]
o) 3. 3. ^-g-^r m.
SMART 4
SMART
1- 71
Codes & Standards
Codes & Standards
Work Breakdown Structure
4. SMART
- II - 5. SMART
SMART i%7\
6.
SMART
SMART
IV.
7|
^ Eamed Value
- iii - SMART 7B^^^1^ -f^sg: 4
7]
SMART
o^^ ^^# ^f ^]f^]^(H^ ft ^=. CDEE 91 yo^^-# MED 91 MSF
# 71 ^-^ SMART
- IV - V.
SMART
7)
- v - SUMMARY
I. Project Title
Development of System Integration Technology for Integral Reactor
n. Objectives and Importance of the Project
1. Objectives
The prime objective of this project is to integrate the conceptual design of an integral reactor, SMART producing thermal energy of 330 MW, which will be utilized to supply energy for seawater desalination and small-scale power generation. This project also aims to develop design integration technology for effective design of the reactor.
2. Importance In developing and designing a nuclear reactor, several technical areas should be systematically coordinated and integrated to produce a single valuable product. In this regard, the integration technology plays a key role since the interface coordination, control and management of those technical areas directly impacts on the achievement of the goal. The reactor design primarily requires the establishment of the integrated goal, design requirements and bases, and the plan of design process. Furthermore, the design can be effectively carried out and the results can be integrated in the useful form when several technologies are systematically interconnected and utilized. They include technology for control and coordination of design information flow between design areas and design processes, management technology for the utilization of tremendous design information and documents, technology for the
- vi - performance evaluation of design, and process management technology. The development of all these technologies and its application to design is thus essentially emphasized for the successful development of the indigenous reactor design and associated technologies. m. Scope and Contents of the Project
The scopes and contents of this project are related to the effective performance of the conceptual design of SMART through the coordinated interactions between technical areas. The include the establishment of design requirements and bases, the evaluation of codes & standards to be applied to the design, the coordination and management of design, the integration of design, preliminary economical evaluation of SMART application, and the planning of required activities for the continuous design works.
1. Establishment of Design Requirements and Bases
• Establishment of Preliminary Items for Design Requirements and Bases
• Evaluation and Establishment of Design Requirements and Bases
2. Evaluation of Codes & Standards for Design Application
• Survey of Existing Codes & Standards
• Evaluation of Applicability of Existing Codes & Standards
• Proposal for Development of Codes & Standards
3. Development of Design Integration and Management Technology
• Evaluation and Coordination of Design Activities
• Establishment of Design Schedule and Work Breakdown Structure
• Coordination of Design Information Flow and Management of Design Process
• Development of Work Performance Evaluation System
- VII - 4. Integration of Conceptual Design of SMART
• Establishment and Integration of Requirements for Operation, Safety, Functions and Performance of Systems
• Integration of Conceptual Design
• Management of Design Technology and Information
5. Preliminary Economical Evaluation of SMART Application
• Survey of Economical Evaluation Methodology for Nuclear Seawater Desalination
• Establishment of Economical Evaluation Methodology
• Economical Evaluation of Seawater Desalination with SMART
6. Planning for Next-Stage Design
• Establishment of Design Schedule and Process
• Planning of Tests and Experiments for Technology Verification
• Planning of Computer Codes Development
IV. Results
Top-tier requirements with respect to the reactor design were established to maximize the utilization of the merits and characteristics of integral reactor. Preliminary design requirements and bases for each functional design area were individually set up so that they satisfy the top-tier requirements. The interface conditions were then finally considered to modify and complement those design requirements and bases.
The reactor design requires the application of the codes & standards. Unfortunately, the codes & standards applicable to the design of integral reactor have not been established yet in the country. The applicability of the existing codes & standards and regulatory laws established for loop-type reactor to the integral reactor has thus analyzed and evaluated. The results of
- VIII - the evaluation came up with the conclusion that the general areas are mostly applicable but some are to be partly or not possibly applicable to the integral-type reactor due to it's structural characteristics of integral reactor. Also as the results, considerations and directions were recommended for the development and establishment of those codes & standards that can be applicable to the design of integral reactor.
To effectively control and manage the tremendous amount of design activities, it is necessary to measure and evaluate the work performance. In order to develop the work performance evaluation technology, the Earned Value concept which is widely utilized in USA was adopted and then complemented by reflecting our design mechanism. The use of this evaluation system made it possible to analyze the work performance without spending much time, and thus contributed to enhance the effectiveness of design management by directly reflecting the evaluation results to the design activities. Furthermore, the study on introduction of the con-current engineering concept to effectively control the design process, technical information, manpower, and cost made it possible to establish the fundamental bases for the project management.
The integration of SMART design purposes to integrate and evaluate the technical feasibility of the design concept and implemented technologies. The evaluation of the design concept against the preliminarily established design requirements and bases, and design goals proves the technical feasibility. The eventual technical feasibility can be proven through the performance and safety analyses. To this end, limiting transients and accidents were selected, and analyses were performed against them. The results showed that the design concepts are acceptable by satisfying the limiting conditions for the steady state cases. However, it was evaluated that minor modifications in some design concepts are needed to satisfy the limiting conditions for certain transient and accident cases.
- ix - The preliminary economical evaluation was performed for the applicability of SMART to the seawater desalination. The computer program, CDEE and evaluation methodology developed by IAEA were selected for the evaluation. The evaluation was carried out for the thermal desalination processes, MSF and MED, with respect to the optimal energy utilization by considering the energy extraction methods from turbine. It was found that the MED process with the heat energy extraction from the middle of turbine is the most economical concept by producing the target of water product and generating the maximum electricity.
The reactor design can be effectively performed only when a reliable design schedule is available. The design schedule and process for the next phase were thus established based on the them of the conceptual design phase. Furthermore, established were the plan for the development of computer codes to be utilized for the SMART design, and the plan for verification tests of implemented technologies.
V. Proposal for Application
The concept of SMART, it's technologies, and design requirements and design bases integrated in this project are to be used as bases for the basic design of the next phase. The design plan will be used as the basic schedule for the basic design of the next phase, towards achieving the design goal. The results of preliminary economical evaluation for the seawater desalination are expected to be utilized for the suggestion of the direction of seawater desalination by using nuclear energy. Furthermore, the results of the applicability evaluation of the codes & standards will be the valuable information for establishing the codes & standards that are applicable to the design of integral reactor.
- x - CONTENTS
Summary (Korean) i (English) vi List of Tables xv List of Figures xvii
Chapter 1. Introduction 1
Chapter 2. Design Requirements and Bases for Integral Reactor 5 1. Introduction 5 2. Design Requirements and Bases for SMART 6
Chapter 3. Evaluation of Codes & Standards for Design Application 23 1. Introduction 23 2. Reactor Design and Codes & Standards 23 3. Evaluation of Applicability of Existing Codes & Standards 27 4. Proposal for Development of Codes & Standards 40
Chapter 4. Development of Design Integration and Management Technology 45 1. Introduction 45 2. Establishment of Design Schedule and WBS 47 3. Development of Performance Evaluation System 50 4. Process Modeling Methodology for Concurrent Design 56
Chapter 5. Integration of Conceptual Design of SMART 65 1. Introduction 65 2. Core Design 66 3. System Design 78
- xi - 4. Mechanical Design 92 5. MMIS Design 108 6. Component Design 123 7. Safety Analysis 138
Chapter 6. Preliminary Economical Evaluation of SMART Application •— 153 1. Introduction 153 2. Establishment of Economical Evaluation Methodology 154 3. Preliminary Economical Evaluation of SMART Application 161 4. Conclusion 167
Chapter 7. Planning for Next-Stage Design and Development 169 1. Introduction 169 2. Establishment of Design Schedule and Process 172 3. Planning of Tests and Experiments for Technology Verification 179 4. Planning of Computer Codes Development 194
Chapter 8. Summary and Conclusion 201
Chapter 9. Achievement of R&D Goals and its Applicability 205
Chapter 10. Future Application Plan for R&D Products 207
References 209
- xii - i SUMMARY vi
xv
U^l- •• xvii
4 1 # ^-& 1 4 2 #
4 | l 66
78
- xiii - 92 ^7^1 108 123
4 7 1
4 6 # SMART %-§- ^lu]^4^ 3g7]. 153 4 1 1 7flA 153 4 21 ^4^ 3§7fH>v^€- 154 4 3 1 <^Hl ^4^ ^7} 161 441 ^§ 167 4 7 # 4 2 #711 1711711^71]^ ^^1 169 4 11 7fl.& 169 4 2 1 l7ll7H^ ^-^^^ 172 4 3 1 SMART 7l^3i^ 1^ T£ +M^ 179 4 4 1 SMART iTfl^-g- ^^.H 7H^1^ 194 4 8 # ^^j- ^ ^^- 201 4 9 % ^^-711^ ^-S^^S *£ tflil7H£ 205 4 10# ^9-7H^^2f^ %-§-4^ 207
209
- xiv - 3-1 29 s. 3-2 SMARTS ^-g-1 ^^f T£ 7)^7]^ 31 s. 4-1 ^ 55 s. 4-2 IDEF T#^S] 7Byi^% 58 3: 5-1 68 S. 5-2 SMART 7fl^f- «^A -M*!*|- 79
5-3 SMART ^71^-^71 7H^^7i]A}oo1= 124 a 5-4 Plant Condition -§H=Hr^- 138 5-5 *}3. Plant Condition ^^-Sr 139 a 5-6 140 a 5-7 SMART A>3.^-^ uj A}^.^^-^^- 140 a 6-1 SMART ^t^#^M
- xv - 3-2 ^><^ 7\^7\&3\ ^^TT"^ ^ tl^^-^l ^7^1 25 3-3 tH^ T^f^l TT-^I-S.^ ^llTffJE. 26
4-2 SMART -^Tl] Work Breakdown Structure 48 4-3 CPM Schedule Report ofl 49 4-4 Earned Value 7\\* , 52 4-5 RVI %A -feel^ tfi^M 54
4-7 IDEFO S-VjlS) -T^^-fi^fc ^J S^ 59 4-8 DDEF3 S5.Afl^=. *.^S. 60 4-9 EDEF3 ^^Ji.4: ^ S*l 61 4-10 SMART ^1-5.^*11 3*Hi 3.^ 62 4-11 RVI 'i^l IDEFO S.'i 63 4-12 RVI *!7il IDEFO 3.*£$) M^ty 63 4-13 RVI ^Tfl-H 4|*> IDEF3 5S^]i S.^ 63 5-1 ^1^1 ic^ ^-Ji-S.^ 68 5-2 RELAP/MOD341- Look-up Table ^ll^l^l
5-3 SCOPS 7l^«l# 7H^S. 73 5-4 SCOMS 71-^^L-i- 7^S. 73 5-5 eJ^rTll-i? -rr^-S. 80 5 / Til. A) T$\ ~5lJ -J$\ ^? OQ -O >tT e^l*\-M| o^ * * **• • •* ••• ***^ 5-7 ^r7fl^ 7fi^£. 85 5-8 tl^Tllig- 7H^j:S. 89 5-9 SMART ^V-S/S W| 3^>^J %^ 93 5-10 SMART Qx\S. - xvi - 5-13 SMART i^l ^cHS^l- 3lWl 98 5_14 -f^^H a}]H] 4-£-*1l^ ^^f 1°2 5-15 ^-^-7] Hfl^J Routing S1! 103 5-16 SMART -^^fS-^^1 ^^ -TF^$ S*i 105 5-17 SMART -f^l^tHM 3*]-^ JB.^^}- ^>^S. 125 5-18 ^^^-^l •kHf-'Hl -^Itl Q^^?} 126 5-19 ^^^-^ -n->l]^]:^ j?l-§-3§7|- 126 5-20 SMART *-<§44 ^-^^5: 3^f-^ S.&1 130 5-21 MCP ^HJE.JS.Bl A|^|-g- % A]^[^l 131 5-22 ^^71^ ^-S. - Torque -^i 132 ^" ftp tj^ J^ ^71 ^2 A^ *rlf| ^J "t^. "**7 JC^. yCV ^I Ol ^ "il-^J "D XJ^I 1 'i C 5-28 i^^l#^2]- -g-^-^-^ *i£J- 146 5-29 Tfl^f-^J-^^Sf 147 ^"r-rr-^ DNBR J\SL 148 5-32 ^r^& s^^iA] DNBR 150 5-33 ilHr1?* 3i}^>A}3.Al 7} 7-1 SMART 7l$ -i7|]# ^j*]; ^f^HJ-^S 7-5 NSSS Safety/Transient Analysis ^^Jl-i-S. 177 7-6 ii4]^7^]^rc>> ^7j]2|2}"i| ^S.*^^ 178 7-7 &AA^k &^nAQA^ 178 - xvii - 1 §• M 71 - 1 - 71 71 , 7] -§-5l - 2 - Sl-b SMARTS °l-§- SMART71- o] H^ 71^ NEXT PAGE(S) left BLANK rcfej- , 7]71, 7] 7] 71 4^ *\ stis.nl 4 SMART - 5 - SMART SMART fe Design Philosophy^] A] 7l iL^-fe 7] (1) SMARTS (2) ^^7]^g-9-7|]^5] <£t-^ 330 (3) (4) (5) (6) ^^ c^o (7) ^>^ ^x] ^^1^ 0.3gl- - 6 - (1) (2) - 100% 60 - 20% - 90% - 90% SMART (3) - 7 - 7mm, (4) Square^ (5) 40 °c -g-71 (6) •• ft ~ (7) ^«}o^ ?J|S.SB|(canned motor)-H -§-71 (8) - 9 - (9) ^A}>g 3EJJ71 (10) SMART #*tf ^r^7]?> «§• SMART (1) (2) (4) *£$.£: *m ^^ Aj-3.4(station blackout) *lt> 4 ^(coping time>Sr (5) ^ -^s. -a4 (6) - 10 - (7) # (8) ^71^-g-Til^ <£&*}*} &^r Ao^H7f 1HJ3I* 4 (9) «| USNRC BTP, RSB (11) ^^7 ^|| ^^(Anticipated Transient Without Scram - ATWS)^H1.£ (12) (13) (14) 34*}^ ^^ Sfe ^>^«H1 ^£.«> ^^ 7]71 (15) SMART-b (16) -11 - (17) (18) 43. (19) NUREG-1465 (20) 75%7]- 13%# (21) 7] ^- 7} (22) 3. ^ 244?!: 25 rem (23) 0.5 (24) - 12 - ft) (25) 7)^^ 6.5. SMARTS (26) 7]^^^.^ SMARTS && (1) NUREG-1070 SMART ^^71^-^-Tll^f- ^TlJA] NUREG-1070 NUREG-1070 - 10CFR50.34(f)ofl ^#5l A - NUREG-0933^1 ^Hf-£H ^Ife USI ^ o^l/#^1 &t\2l GSI ^ TMI ^ USI - 13 - *> - SMARTS] ^-g-5]fe ^irg-^ ^^(probabilistic safety assessment - PSA) $M Ef- ^M (2) *m -§-71 -i^ ^o> ^^ -§-717} -8-7151 71^ ^lA^oi aj-jisi (3) f4 (4) 2. ^^ ll £jl4.-b SMART ^^4 g|1> fe i4l4^ ^ ^} SMART - 71 71 S| ^-«- £3 ^^S: -84 71 § 4^51 *H ^4^- ti*H 1SS. 7l 711- ^1^14, %*} % 41^ ^-fi-71- ^<^c»> ^rfe ^># ^nl?>t:>. 711 - 14 - 7] service factor) 7\. tt ^« ^7)1 71$ Af^L ^r^- ^711 71$ A}3.fe cM -Ml - SMARTS ^^! *©] ^ SMARTS o) ^^ 100% Al ^ ±20% ^ -^ ±20%/^ - 15 - - ioo - KefF £ 0.95*1 «]^7fl 2*1 off 4 6r]7)j - 20% #^ *oW14 Keff £ 0.95^1 tt 717114 7l# 4^4°fl 7l#^ ^r^i 4*> 3:^l(limiting condition for operation - LCO)oli4 cj-s. yj-^^ ^.^ 4*1- o.|tij- ^^(reactor protection system - RPS)^ ^--§- 7^1-^-(engineered safety features actuation system - ESFAS)^ SMARTS 7}^^^ 90%# - 16 - Canned Motor Pump ^Bfl£| ^£44 ^S# 4 «Vt:].. o SMART*) SMARTS SMARTS 100 men-rem/year 90004 Canned Motor Pump S# A). - 17 - 717H1 SMARTS ^?I^# * 7} •$ro]?>}£.Sj. ^7\],^*m3., ^) ^.fiL 7l7l^ ^A 7)715] J SMART 3. SMARTl- SMART £*l iL^^l 4*]: ^^HJ-31 ^ SMART »g-o|5| 4^*]: W^) ^>. SMARTS 1.70(rev. SMARTS 4^8: protection system)*] (engineered safety features)^ - 18 - if SMART 7HJ- 7171 4 71- 1.70OJI SMARTS - 19 - anticipated transient without scram) 4 ^r^-^fe <^5| 7H^ rn>*f %-i-^ 4^i(anticipated operational occurrence)^ SMART frequency - -4, (infrequent - ^ ^ 4 SMART ^^l^ ^4" 7] SMART7]- 71 4 71 § Aj-^Lofl c)ft> *!-§- 7l^^r NUREG-0800, 4^ (standard review plan - SRPH ^^5] ^711 - 20 - e>. 43. SMARTS 15%!- X\ 10~6 n) Grace Period!- «hg-3E. Canned Motor PumpS. NEXT PAGE(S) left BLANK - 21 - si ^ 714^711, (regulations, codes & standards) -§•-§- o}6\] SMART SMART - 23 - 2. - 24 - .[l] 6] SflTJfe 4 t 3-1 - 25 - (General Safety Criteria)^ ^ «tel£ ^ ^41 H? (Specific Safety Requirements)^ ^^^^Hl-H ^^r-Slfe 7l (Safety Regulatory Guides)^ aM^fl^l <<% ^ S. (Safety Review Guides)^! fe ANSI, ASME, IEEE, ASTM, RCC -§• iq^-^ ^^71^-71^^- 4-§-/^-§-*M ^f. H^m qt>^7lfSl 7f 1995\1 11^ #^^71 #71^ (Korea Electric Power Code : KEPIC)£] .4 496-32^1 - 26 - a $13., , o] 1. - 27 - ^ 3-3 1970\!tfjcfl , 1987 (Korea Electric Power Code : KEPIQSl JL - 28 - 3-1 €^ IM &n #^S 1,2^7] ^^ S§ ^gJ-^ilg(CFR) AECB ftmg 2!-S7|$(J1A|) (RFS) S^S^IIS (RCC) (Regulatory Guide) Si x|§ Eiej/aa^iTfls (RRC) £59^*1 £ (SRP) ?|-i4c|- SJX^ss - ASME - ASTM - IEEE SlriiSW (NF) f5 7|#7|§ - ACI - ANS ?3(ANSI) 2. SMART - 29 - ofi KEPIC *} ASME 51 330 SMARTS 3. SMART ^Tflofl rfl^T; 7] 3-6^7] ^ ^^ofl (regulations, codes & standards) -§••§• SMARTS] - 1807f SMART •te 4 -f- SMART - 30 - 3-2 SMARTS 7|Hr 7|S?£ 1 3 a -y?ii-g-o|: 2 ERSSPI^IS 1 3 Code of Federal Regulations 20 14 4 US NRC Regulatory Guide 58 50 5 • R 7M|S|-S| 7|#7|§- (ASME Code) 9 7 ^Ml^^l, ^?|7|^7|| 6 22 19 (ANSI Standard) 7 oR ^xHM^sl 7|^ (ANS Standard) 4 4 aR A|i! SI *HS*rS| ?IS 8 12 12 7|7||^7||, ^7|7[^?)| (ASTM Standard) DR S7| gj gx^si 7|§ aiSSJNI. g 26 21 (IEEE Standard) 10 oR # T"-S«tS| 7|§ (AISC) 1 1 ^i7i-a^i 11 o|^ ai<5SS| ?IS (ISA) 2 2 12 DR €SSSI 7|5 (AWS) 1 1 13 DR 5A^^ 1 1 14 DR a^e^S 7is 3 3 MMIS-g?l| 15 Standard Review Plan 5 5 16 NUREG 10 10 MMIS-^Ti] 17 SECY 2 2 MMIS^Tfl # S 180 152 (1) 10CFR 50. App. A GDC : Criterion 26 - Reactivity control system redundancy and capability. - 31 - ^ SMART PWROIIA-1 SL\-}, SMARTS (2) Appendix B to Part 50 : Quality Assurance Criteria for Nuclear Power Plants and Fuel Reprocessing Plants. "§• ^1^^: PSART-1- FSAR<^1 S^-5] (3) 10 CFR 50. App. I : ALARA ]^ ^ ^.^ofl ;£*]- ALARA 14S.51 ^^i 4*J ^£ 9 *> ^o]n>. SMARTS ALARA (4) RG. 1.68 : Initial Test Programs for Water-Cooled Reactor Power Plants. Appendix A PWRo]!,} BWR^] ^^fe A]^ %>^-O] 7l#5H Sl^. SMARTS 3.7fl PWR - 32 - nucleate heating^] rcj-e> (5) RG 1.77 : Assumptions Used for Evaluating a Control Rod Ejection Accident for PWRs. RG 1.77 Appendix A^fe aM-g- o]^ A]-JLA] space-time kinetics J= MASTER# (6) RG 8.8 : ALARA^l °1 xl^-cr ALARA(As Low As Reasonably Achievable) 7^6]] , SMARTS 6\] rcj-e} s]^. ^^K§. *tf}^ ^ *X^ as. ^^2f^^A^ ALARA (7) ANSI/ANS-51.1 : Nuclear Safety Criteria for the Design of Stationary PWR Plants. (1) 10 CFR 50.46 : ECCS Criteria, ECCS^l SMARTS - 33 - Instrument Line Break, Purification System Line Break ig-o] ^H^^l-^^r^l^] tJf^H Short Term Mitigation ^g-f Accumulator-!- MPa)*H sfl^Sf.2. Long Term Mitigation^ SBLOCA (2) 10 CFR 50.61 : Pressurized Thermal Shock, SMARTSA-1^- SBLOCA*] (3) 10 CFR 50.62 : Anticipated Transient without Scram, ATWS Events ^r^9^] Diverse Protection System(DPS) -i*) SMARTSAjfe ATWS7]- ^^§^ =g-f ^^Mlf-^I 6J"^°1 19 MPa<>11 £ hydraulic connected circuit breaker7r TH^^^L (4) 10 CFR 50 App. A © Separation of Protection and Control Systems (GDC 24) h SMARTS 7]^r7H^^r Safety Channel^- Control Channel^ ^e]*^ 7jJ^7](sensor) ^ 51 ^.^-(Malrunction)ol (2) Reactivity Control System Redundancy and Capability (GDC 26) SMARTS 3^3U]ir ^-f-i> Jc^^^l- 7]^7il^^S *fl^^3. $1 •& ^^7^^!^: ^^-^ ^ ^14. aem 4iAlfe Makeup Pumpl- o| Emergency Boron Storage Tank5.-f-^ -g-^# - 34 - MTC © Inspection of Reactor Coolant Pressure Boundary (GDC 32) SMARTS © Containment Heat Removal (GDC 38) SMARTS ol*}^I^ ^4^r^]^ (Water Inventory)^: 1 Steel 1I ff 4] Steel (5) RG 1.139 : Guidance for Residual Heat Removal. ff-(PRHR System)o] (6) ASME Overpressure Protection (Div-1 Subsection NB) y^^ no% SMARTS 1^1151 i^^^ 110%# (7) ASME Rules for Inservice Inspection Reactor Coolant Pressure Boundary^] ^}^ 7]7]£{ ±3. SMART ^lA-lfe e^r^^-S. 7}&$ ^Aft ^ ^ &£ ^«. (PZR vfl^- CEDM Nozzle Welding Point, SG Tube Welding Point ^)-§- 4 Al 7f - 35 - (8) ANSI/ANS 18.1 : Radioactive Source Term for Normal Operation of Light Water Reactors. Off-line Off-line ^^1^ K ^-^1^ On-line W^& ^ lfi^ 7f (9) IEEE 279 : Standard Criteria for Protection Systems for Nuclear Power Generating Stations. L Isolation Device A|~g- -^ ^^Q 7]^# -§^(4.7 Control and Protection System Interaction)*^^" -SL^^f^l ^1^}. SMARTS]M^ -S. Isolation Device-! -f-«H SMART 2\&o]]^ SMART (1) 10 CFR 50 App. A ^ GDC 32, RG 1.83/ 1.150, ASME Section XI Inspection of Reactor Coolant Pressure Boundary 7]7] - 36 - 4<=Hl ^t> %£-$- SMART ofl4fe 100% (2) 10 CFR 50 App. H, 3.X\ 92-20 (3) RG 1.20 : , Category I.H SMARTS 7 ^ in-situ (4) 10 CFR 50.61 : Pressurized Thermal Shock, 7} LBL0CA7f ^AJES ° SBLOCA^I - 37 - nf. MMIS SMART ,£SS SMART ^SM^)1 (1) IEEE /ANSI 1042 : Guide to Software Configuration Management , SMART 4:Sm ^ (2) IEEE/ANSI 1063 : Standard for Software User Documentation 6\] cH*> ij-fc j^^i^- 4^1-3. $X^h ^- S^^r SMART 4iS (3) IEEE/ANSI 1219 : Standard for Software Maintenance SMART ^^S (4) IEEE/ANSI 1016 : Recommended Practice for Software Design Descriptions - 38 - 7]#A-1 (Software Design Description)^ iSM c> ^ 4*oi-4 ^ ufl-g.^] tjf*]; ^]^^- ^|A|*>3. 5tl4. KWH, SMART SMART 7H^^|# MM ^ ^ ^^ ^>^^€ ^7^)7l§ 4^ ^-§-7]^ol *o>^ SMART o]-§-t> SMART <>M^1 ^7^ %°]t\. &.*} SMART (1) ANSI/ANS 51.1-R1988 : Nuclear Safety Criteria for Design of Stationary PWR SMART A\ £.7\*}3. Q Coincident Occurrence ^ Single Failure Frequency7} (2) ANSI/ANS 58.9 : Single Failure Criteria *&7§7\&*\3. ^r^- ^ «||^ x]o\) 7}^\c^o\ ^ single Failure^! -^-S SMARTS - 39 - (3) IEEE 379 : Single Failure Criteria ^71-^4:2. £-fr 9J *1H *HI 7}^Ho^ Single Failure SMARTS (4) RG 1.77 : Assumptions Used for Evaluating a Control Rod Ejection Accidents for Pressurized Water Reactors SMARTS] , SMARTS id 7)] ^ ^(fof-g. o]^; A] CEDMo] LOCA A>3.5H^ol ^^.^ (5) 10CFR50 34.46 Apeendix K : ECCS Evaluation Models SMARTS 71^^7(1 7H^| 3g7}Sli(Evaluation Model : EM)5] SMART 71 ^< SMART# - 40 - 7}. , 71 , dynamic rod worth SMARTS ^-g- El-^-A^o] Q$~ ol^f^Sl ^ • ^"4^ SMARTS <=»> 10CFR202f U]3.%} 4 SMARTS 10CFR20*! L Stlfe 1957V1 *kl£& 10CFR20l!f 1977\1 2. SMARTS - 41 - 7\. ^^^ ^v LBLOCAfe SBLOCA SMARTS ZL Q^^ ^^^# 411 ^ft H1 M h }) ^± ] l Off-line - Off-line - ATWS 3. 7}. el- 717151 - 42 - SMARTS 9J in-situ LBLOCA LBLOCA^j SBL0CA7]- o] 4. MMIS-iTl] 7] *> oil- SMART 4 4-§-4 - 43 - 5. SMART <#*lt;fl*j ^-g- 7^M °1*I-5F]-§-71§£- ANSI/ANS 58.9£f IEEE 3792f :££*]; Qx}$. ^-^^-^4 7\}^7}7]S>] #<£3. °\ ^Q ^ °1# °]-§-*H ANSI/ANS 51.1-1983(R1988)# oj-i- cq^H SMART # Coincident Occurrences^l- Single Failure^ JL^*> SMART PSA i-f. SBLOCA ECCS •?i4S.^ ECCS ^-^-SL^i^ 3§7l-H>1-^§^: 10CFR50.463^ 10CFR50 Appendix K^I 7}^5\°] $X-$-*\, 1987^^] 7fl^^ Appendix K^l i>|*H SBLOCA ECCS ^^^7}^ r\. CEA Ejection SMART i^^^r Regulating Bank7|- - 44 - 5! ^.S.fe PERT/CPM^j Network (multi-disciplinary)7} ) nfl-f WBS(Work Breakdown Structure) -down approache IDEF(Integration DEFinition) - 45 - SMART 7] >!^^ Mock-up, Prototype, Virtual Model tf Network Client/Server 4 CAD/CAE -i Networking [5MA-1 SAMRT S!i4. - 46 - "f5 Safe 1. Work Breakdown Structure (WBS) MIL-STD881[6] OBS(OrganizationaI Breakdown Structure)^ ^$>g fe FBS (Functional Breakdown Structure)^. ^3E]B}, FBSfe SS.^|S CWBS(ContractuaI Work Breakdown Structure)7} Contractual Work Breakdown Structure (WBS) Organization Breakdown Structure (OBS) I SMART | | Nexty 1— CoitAccourt -Schedule -Budget • Cost Account Manager ZL^ 4-1 OBSif WBS^ - 47 - -l£ CWBS*} = Segment^ fetfl, o] Segment CA(Cost Account)7]- ^ 7171 7]71 H^l 4-2 SMART Work Breakdown Structure SMARTS Segment fe WBS# , ^ 5l7fl Segment, 40(H Summary Activity, l,500 - 48 - 2. >-]^^I^ Logic Network Activity ^Ji£]- ^^7|^ Activity i ^-^ Resource fe Work Package Owner 4-3 CPM Schedule Report - 49 - f. ojofl re^f £ <&^7fl^^&eHM-b SMART ^, MMIS, WBS 9-A^^# ol-§-tl CPM Schedule Report^ <^ Activity (Early Start), ^7l^S(Early Finish), ^]^^-^(Late Start), x Finish) ^H] ^^2} Float^-S. t+Bj-T-fe Activity1! ^g-^^-^-S., Resource 4 , Activity Activity^ ^*|^l-£# %^1^ ^r al^-^, d]# 5-7iS *> fe SMART DoE ^HH ?to] %-§-5]3. $ll^- ^3L}-^el>«.l^^ *> SMART - 50 - 1. ^^ (Earned Value Analysis) fe ^-^-S.^ Work Package ^-& Segment^] 7j] - Budgeted Cost for Work Scheduled(BCWS): Si^Sf ^r*|^fe^] ^ Actual Cost for Work Performed(ACWP): Budgeted Cost for Work Performed(BCWP): 71^- } Q} BCWPfe - 51 - ACWP<4 *fl Schedule Variance(SV) : ^ (Critical Path) SV = BCWP - BCWSif Cost Variance(CV) : CV = BCWP - ACWP ^ ^o] Variance at Completion(VAC): BACA]- EAC# H]J1*M VAC = BAC - EAC ss ZL^J 4-4 Earned Value - 52 - 2. ^$ H81^ ol EVMS^ *l4(current)4}- *]-g-7]-*] »| ^ (cumulative), A};*} (completion)^*] 4# ^*££ *1^# <§Fg*WI Qr.\. tfl t. SPI(Schedule Performance Index), CPI(Cost Performance Index), ZLZ]3. TCPI(To-Complete Performance Index)7|- $X^h SPI^f CPfe TCPfe °>^= <^|4^ EAC i-MM CA , BCWPif WIP(Work-in-Process) CPfe ^7]* , BCWPif ojn] ^*|^ Activity!- cJf^^S. *V Activity^ >. ^, TCP t^, TCPI - (BAC-BCWP)/ (EAC-ACWP)i}- ^o] I^B]-^ ^ Qz}. ^^ CPI if H13.2M- 4 TCPfe ^olSa^ ^^^1^7} Sjfecfl, ^-^r ^^-^ # ^^*tecfl A}-§-^ ^ ^cf. TCPIif ^3 CPI^ X}°]7\ 20% 44r EAC7f 2f7i ^*|£^f ^J7fl7f EVMSoflA-)^ WBSM- OBSSJ 4 if x]^-7fx|^ ^*H] rfl«> 4^.# 7Mi SV, CV, SPI, CPI, H TCPI ] - 53 - - sw> cvi- - sv, cv^ * - CPI, SPI, TCPI Work Package^ EAC# 3. ^^# SMART 5a m wmffrtm ts m w ReVisior evtslon qt preliminary design loads. : * av?|qp.ment!of.tent9tive. f.proRQnept.steJp.ix ' Static analysis for prs(rnrnajydesigrt|S • Survey of proper (ationales ; Conhrmaiion^of initial sizing forstatic loaidin - -: ' &&S Review of preliminary sketch flfcompone^S : j : : :&^Re^ewo{prelimlniiiy:sketcaofa&eiM ES7 Dynamic analysis for preliminary deslon. • : jrra of slrnpllfied dynamic ajnaVsts : \ \ • '. '. | '• Review of dynamic analysis results I ; ; j ; ; • : Pevetoprnentcrinleitac? dataforjottiersystem - ; : '' Development of preBminary dynamic leads : •• • 0Prepirabon of preliminary assertiij;:; preliminary system designsequlrifredulriee ::••:•••:; ::**: Internal Re i?* glfRI svstam Seslan rsqulremeh)? DJ& 4-5 RVI - 54 - Segment -f- 7]7%<£Jfl&>}$i\ ^^f^-^^1 (Reactor Vessel Internals) *} Report Earned Value Reporter Cost Performance Report(CPR)<^lt:}. n.^ 4-5^ Sample Project^! -$2HlH"£- 4\Q Earned Value ^1# 711^*1 Resource Profile^ ^.^^3. $X^l 4-1^: ofl^U Segment^ '98.6^7^1^1 d14. °lfe, BCWP, BCWP, ACWP, BAC, EAC Al^(Current), ZL nfl^l^J ^r^(Cumulative), |^ (Completion)^!*\$] SV(%), SV, SPI, CV(%), CV, CPI, 3. TCPI 44 -tt^^rSiC 1^.^, 4 4-1 BCWS BCWS 631 BCWP BCWP 606 ACWP ACWP 619 BCWP-BCWS - 25 SV(%) SV/BCWP X 100 - 4.1 BCWP-ACWP - 13 CV(%) CV/BCWP x 100 - 2.1 SPI BCWP/BCWS X 100 96 CPI BCWP/ACWP X 100 97.9 TCPI (BAC-BCWP)/(EAC-ACWP) x 100 96.4 SV- -4.1%7r Sjfe 4.1% , 4 CV -2.1 - 55 - 2.1% SPfe Data Date ^4 96%O|TJ}, 7^ f. SPI7]- 100%3] 100 fe- ^JLS. oj-g-^r:]-. ZielJL, CPfe 97.9% ^c-11, TCPI7F 96.4%^. 97.9^1 7\*]7\ n^<£c\i$. ^^ 1-5% 1. -^A|^-t|(Concurrent Engineering) ^^1 ^y-^^-^S. %-S-5|3. $afe IDEF(Integration DEFinition) 19761,1 USAF (US Air Force)of Enterprise Model)# fi^-&f7| ^|*> ICAM (Integrated Computer Aided Manufacturing) HS«)M5] A)^^ uj ^7)^0.5. ^H1^^^]-. K>EF - 56 - SADT(Structured Analysis and Design Technique)! x^S) -§•/.] •§-*}• x^Q-Q ^ $XSi^ ^i^Q ^,^-S.M CALS(Computer-aided Acquisition and n Logistics Support) lf^ u> OrM^r n}^ <^^ ^^^B|S^*1 FIPS^ A)^ v^ ^^l^*-o1 IEEE, ISO -b n^l 4-6^1^ Sequential Engineering Initial Scope Pis i m+i nary — Production Design Definition Design •*— Life-Cycle Time Concurrent Engineering Initial Design [ —I Scope Definition ] 1 Preliminary Design Detailed Design I i Test & Analysis Prototyping Production Time Saved CE Life-Cycle Time ZHU 4-6 2. S3.A|| i - 57 - K)EF (AS-IS Model), 1(TO-BE Model>§- IDEF 3- ^Ife ^€r IDEFO(Function Modeling)^- IDEFl/lX(Information and Data Modeling)olT}. o]^. H^^S. 1990^CH 4-2 IDEF IDEF Method Purpose of Method Status IDEFO Function Modeling n a&s IDEF1/1X Information/Data Modeling n im^ IDEF3 Process Description Capture n 'a&s. IDEF4 Objective-Oriented Design IDEF5 Onthology Descriptive Capture IDEF6 Design Rationale Capture IDEF7 Information System Audit Method IDEF8 User Interface Modeling 7H©oiig IDEF9 Business Constraint Discovery Capture IDEF10 Implementation Architecture Modeling IDEF11 Information Artifact Modeling IDEF12 Organization Modeling IDEF13 Three Schema Mapping Design IDEF14 Network Design 711^011 S - 58 - 14. IDEFO IDEFO ivities), SE-fe- 7]-^(Function)^- t £r*h ^f^ss is-ti^H •^••^ •^°l -^ IDEFO s^ 4-72]- ^-o] a]-^ ^Bfl^. S^]3tJ^ 7]-^(Function):z}- ICOM(Inputs, Outputs, Controls, Mechanisms)^.: Function ^J Function^^ :#7j]# y o^(0utside-In Approach)^ MOi I(Controls) —• (Inputs)"*' (Function or Activity) (Outputs) •Output3 atriumi (Mechanisms) 4-7 IDEFO 3.^$] IDEF3 - 59 - IDEF3 ^Ji-b ^flsrf^ufl, HS.4^^-§-fi.4(Process Flow Description)^ <>lS.A>(Object State Transition Description)7f IDEF3 HS.4^ ^ r. IDEF3 4-8^ IDEF3 S (1) UOB(Units of Behavior) (2) (3) (4) Referents : UOBi} Use Corp Quality Define Roles Define Elements to Improvement and Establish Cycle ResponsMttes EE on System 3.1 1.1 8.1 Define Benefit Enrollnnert Process 6.1 ZLQ 4-8 IDEF3 BDEF3 fe 3. 1^. •&-§-. lfe UOB UOBfe, UOBl- - 60 - ^(Elaboration)^! 1) ^1^):^ ^*l(Temporal Precedence) , 2) (Object Flow) UOB U0B7f UOBS ^ Fan Out(Divergence) U0B7]- ^ Fan In(Convergence) UOB Symbols Uoka UCHBUbote 1 rn.ityi " 1 OftieetFlowUlk 1.1.: -':. {-,•'.'-''••. Referents and Notes —SynchraiwiuiAND —OH g—ExduatvaOR ZL^3 4-9 IDEF3 - 61 - 3. 7\. ^i^^ SMART(System integrated Modular Advanced ReActor) K SMARTS] HU 4-10 SMART CAD/CAM/CAE ^^ CAD/CAM/CAE CAD/CAM/CAE - 62 - f. RVT Sf\*y IDEF (outline drawing), A] ^i em requirements), ^]^^! -^ ^ ^ (system description)!- ASME 3.S., ^-4J3L^i, -¥-*>^^ -§-5j S^^^ ^t> CAD/CAM/CAE ^ resource).^ 47fi-|#(mechanism)o| %-g-5]<>| RVI Al>, ZL^J 4-11 RVI IDEFO H^ 4-12 RVI ^ IDEFO (node tree) Activity/Concepts D^^! - 63 - Activity Based Cost nfles} &DJ-. , 7]^ IDEF3 S3.4^ RVI . "RVI System Model" -b "Assembly Drawing'-o] ^^, RVI Pirtminafy Onwfcvg SptdficaSon Evtrt* fEh r.i | 4-13 RVI IDEF3 SS4^ - 64 - 5 # SMART n]| c. *> database fl SMART ^JSL SMART - 65 - n 2 ^ SMART 57H SMART 7} 235 5 wt. 0.05 4.95 wt.as# WABA ^ AI2O3-B4C ^2f Al2O3-B4Ci]- . [12] [13] Aov-§- ^ (xenon reactivity defect) [14] - 66 - 25 ^9|JiS.(checkerboard) h 29 B4C . 33 71 & 41 H] ^-A -feo] 2 m«Jl 17x17 U02 57 .^.T^, 4.95 wt. 990 26.25 MWD/KgU) ^*> AI2O3-B4C 1,304 12 wt.*S} Gdz03-U02 -g- 244 7H 9 7fl^ Ag-In-Cd . 32 7|J^ B4C 41 1% 5-1 gj a 5-1 off 7] CASMO-3/ MASTER 3.17, 6flA| +30% AO 20% o|#ofl,fc| ±65%, 20% 1 -40 pcm/°C -3 pcm/°C ~ -25 - 67 - D D D 1 B A B A B 2 B B A 0 A B B 3 D A A D A D A A D 4 D B D A C A D B D 5 D A A D A D A A D 6 B B A D A B B 7 B A B A B 8 D D D 9 5-1 6(1*1 3: 5-1 Gd203-U02 Si Mr AI2O3-B4C A 20 4.95 240 24 - B 16 4.95 244 20 - C 1 4.95 236 24 4 D 20 4.95 228 24 12 DNB ^^# - 68 - MASTER . [20] ial zoning) 2.6 fe SMART - 69 - 2. ^ SMART ^\ fl\ ^ ^M 1 g4^ 4# $*fc £j^ oj-^IH^ sf\^Y i^ !-. SMART ^^r*! ^^<^1^ DNBR ^-^^r MATRA[22]it KRB-1 ^^^# °l-§-*H ^r^^^^}. ^^ AM <8# 3&4^7l ^^ DNBR 2.072} CE-1 ^J-^-iJ *>4 DNBR 1. 4 990^<^l^ SMART i^^ DNBR Ai S.A^ L}E}L|t ^l^jSfe DNBR Levy 3&4 11 ^^ A}-g-*j: 4^71-7} A-?^^K SMART 3&4 Jc^ofl «]«H ^^L^, ii^^r ^^1^^-S. fe -5«S M-Bl-ii^. ii-a ^-a- 1-T1 *Jtfl ^H^lfe 651 Btu/lbmo] 25% ^-t:}. o]^ SMART «?^^.^ ^d]7l- KOFA^fl > 87fiofH 57HS #Sd7] 4^"C'I^K SMART 0.095 BarS 7l^ 3.Z] 3&4 317] ^^ 7%o]t\. SMART l 3&4 5171 -8^51 4f 30% ^ SMART «f«!S -g7K^do>e*£ "r^*l"^oI 7}^j- ^. 20°C - ^^ 1.18 KH3.M 3.Z] 3&4 SMART -t^^ ^^"^^i S^«^>H^ DNBR ^r^^lfe MATRAif KRB-1 ] SMART - 70 - LE.°i RELAP5/M0D37f 4*5^ ^Tfl^-fHNr Look-Up Tabled &m MPa^A-liE. RELAP5/MOD3^f Look-Up Table ^7^7} ^^> Ji^^tl ^^\M: & &.£. # 4, ^^ Q^0] 12 MPa fe Look-Up Tabled K2 RELAP5/M0D3if Look-Up Table ^Il7jl7|- MATRA/KRB-1 ^1^]^} H|S| DNBR# Ji K Winfrith A]^|^|-^-# ^"^tl ^^S. 31-2-7]- ZLQ 5-2<^l ^l^lSl^l-fe^l, S. £.$) 3000 2500 2000 +30% / o 1500 _ Q. Winfrith Data [1] "a" 1000 G = 600, 1200 kg/m's A 70 bar O 100 bar 500 • 140 bar T7 ISObar 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 ^"Measured 5-2 RELAP5/M0D3if Look-up Table - 71 - SMART =. MATRAif KOFA-§- SMART i^ ^r^^^^l ^ 6) 3. tl^l^ % SMART-§- Jt-y^l^I^Smart COre Monitoring System, SCOMS) -(Smart COre Protection System, SCOPS)^ *U1#J»3. ^U)*]-3L 1L2:*1-JE^- COLSS ^ CPCS# SMART Tll^] <^^-£^- ^^l^Sd^K ^l^f ^^ SMARTS 10-4% o]^ ^-f ZL 7l-^ 3. -a^r^^l DNBR^f ^#^ SCOPS *|7ll7l€# ^>^ . SCOPS-fe 100% A} ^ 100% A}oHM ^^H 5 %/min 15%if 100% 4 5-3 ^ ZL^l 5-4^ SCOPSij- SCOMS SCOPS - 72 - SCOPS , CEAP, UPDATE, POWER, SCOMS ^SS^Hfe Flow Adjusted DNBR RCP Speed RCP Delta P Outputs to POWER & STATIC FLOW Inputs (Core Flow Tin (UPDATE). Calculation) Tout Exeore Flux E UPDATE I Pressure (DNBR and TRIPSEQ CEA Core Power (Trip Signal CEAP Generation) Positions CEA Deviation PFm Update) (CEA Program) Outputs to FLOW & POWER POWER STATIC (DNBR Tout& Inputs (Power Distribution) Inputs Calculation) (FLOW& Saturation Temp. UPDATE) (FLOW) 5-3 SCOPS «:•!• Alarm/Display Feedwater Flow Delta P Feedwater Temp. Feedwater Pressure SG Pressure RCP Speed Core Power Limit Core Outlet Temp. based on DNBR Core Inlet Temp. Core Power RCS Pressure Distribution andASI Core Power Limit CEA Position based on LPD In-core Flux Licensed Power Limit ~L^[ 5-4 SCOMS - 73 - 4. SMARTS W4L -5-2}<£# 0RIGEN2.1 3-E. SMARTS NSSS Tfl-g- >i7}l £ BOP ^Ttfofl o] ^ SMART DORT 2.8803xl0'16 n/cm2S ^7l-5|^t:}. o)^. 1OCFR5O.61^1 +20 2 1.0xlO n/cm &&} 4^r ^-5LS. SMART*] Q g1 ff] R-Z 71^-7-^^1 cJ|*M DORT 3H 91 ^#^r 3.70x106 -& «>^ 40 cm *J*l<>fH 1.53xlO13 3.60x105 6.68x106 n/cm2sec5. 40 cm ^^Hl^H 1.03xl014 5.80x105 n/cm2secS. -§-71 SJJMI J ^MI- 91 3/4517)if ^^ UfBVldtS., U^X] ^^^ ^fe 61= 3/451717} 1 (SMART: - 74 - . LOCA n*\6\] >«fg-^ ERF-fe . MCNP4B j #H SMARTS! Pin/Box Ul-i-ofl tfl# ERFl ^f^K SMARTS ^^5. 4^-i- o|^43-Al 7}^S] EAB ^ LPZ >3. RG 1.77O1M 5/65171^ 490 m ^ 5,633 m 7]€\S] EAB LPZ ^TiHlA^ ^ o|^-^5it:>. 31144 s}^^^ 20 ~ 1OO%S H £2} n)^-47f 100% 3>^S ^-fdHS. EAB4J- LPZ 91' ^-tl ^5ov°] 10 CFR 100OM ^Al*> s}^. ^1*>^1 oj 3 Sv ^ 250 mSv SMARTS 7]^ ^711 ^^ofl rcj-ej- 5. SMART .^^)1^ CASMO-3/MASTER 3. HELIOS/ MASTER SHAflTlM- 43-°] MATRA i| ^U-f- SB^ SH^l MARS[24] MASTER# ^f-^l-Sd^K ^Aov ^^ ^^°1 ^H^^S. ^^r SMART ^#^^1 ^1-5+ ^r^# JH*H ^^ ^^^V^r^l-^ 2\W<& COMPASS [25]*] SH°J MASTER-! ffl^&ty. MASTER - 75 - MASTER 3£. JEK ^ , MATRAfe ^- MATRA71- (Heat Capacity, Heat Conductance) ^£}-# ^L^^M $i3. &7J ]7] ^]^fl 7jf>do| o] SMARTS 2 = ti MASTERS MARS 1.35] ^-tg- A)^^-i- ^-^l-^uK o|5j*> -^^J- A|>r^{^. *ov*u SMART SMARTS < (Object Oriented) 4^: 4^# #*> ^^ «?1^] B>o)a.e|el (Dynamic Link Library, DLL)# 4-§-*>^^>. MASTER/MARS f^3£5] X\ jfl^o. ABB_CE t COLSS (Core Operating Limit Supervisory System)7]- - 76 - (on-line)^ SMART «>^^^ <>!*]•£) ^^3} ^1^ ^ ^H >M^1§ 9-^] on-line in COMPASS COMPASS^ 3]- COMPASS^] #^-g£fe ii^ «f-i7JlS£ MASTER^ , SMART Jt^ofl ^}-§-^ ^-f-oflfe COLSSif - 77 - 1. SMART SMART T 7\7]7\ *1# ^S.^ Large Break L0CA f. SMART 4 SMART >H^^ ^A ^Tll^fe a 5-KHI 7}. ASME isLE. Ill, & ^44fe 414S-S-71 2 cm n^LS. <& -§-71 - 78 - 5-2 SMART i^^iJ-^MWt) 330 •^§•7] ^ (kg/hr) 550,000 ^^] •^r^J 4 *«^(MPa> 15 •Ma +*Wtf) 1/4 fe ^ 5-5ofl - 79 - Debris Filter 5-5 717} fl-M. 71^7} 5:6)) 3]%} - 80 - ^M", 7171 714 71 4 51 711 717151 ^.^ 51 hydraulic Control System)^ - 81 - . zj- 4^^ , 17HS1 AM si 7} 711 72 - 82 - Concrete Containment Steel Containment Atmosphere Heat Exchanger \ 1 L. Safeguard Vessel Feed Water Feed Water Main Steam *C> Main Steam Reactor Vessel Steam Generator -HU 5-6 . 4 ^l^^r - 83 - o) key-locko] key-lock 4 7} o| HU 5-7011 724 - 84 - 1,2,3,4 — •*•—*• aa?aaa 1,2 5-7 Period)^ 7171 *] 7} S: 27{f*l al*-^ 4 7J7I 91 » 100% . 4 - 85 - System)^ , 4 724 4 7 . 4 uflofl Internal Shielding Tank) ifl fe H^ 5-8^1 - 86 - Concrete Builing HVAC XXX X Safeguard Vessel I I T T / Reactor Overpressure Emergency PRH Com >ens atiot Tank Internal Shielding Tank O.^ 5-8 2. 7}. SH(ONCESG) fe U- SAFE, ATH0S3 SMARTS A} - 87 - ONCESG IHfe -3~£(COLDPZR) 3.7)7} ^14 SMARTS]A-]^ ^-^ COLDPZR^ ^^H^^>S^1 SMARTS] C>. SMART -iTflA] o|5|«> SGINS 3.^. Laplace - 88 - Routh-Hurwitz £S o] 3. MMS 3LE. 7}. MMS 3H , 7171 Framatome Technologies Inc. (FTI) Modular Modeling System(MMS)e}fe r.}. MMS S^.# SMART ^A 7^1^^ ^^^H^# ^?> 7l7lS#^ cU^-^ MMS 3.^7} •^fe ^.^1^1^, SMARTS MMS 3.^7 MMS 3.i=# o]-g-*> SMART - 89 - MMS &£.< SMART 3.^-^V ^Jf 7] 7] debugging 4. #^ SMART ^Jg.'iTflcfl-b 71 €• , once-through helically coiled tube ^S SMART 4i^>S.^- 7]^- ^xfS.51- U}$ ^4^^ ^-^# 7WJ2. 51^-^1 7171 SMART #43. ^^71 ^-^-T]!^ (NSSS)5l - 90 - 4^ *L 3J ^^M |# ^*> SMART NSSS SJ *$*§• £<§• Afci S^# ^*j| SMART - SMART 5. CFX version 4.2 thermal sizing ZL# *t 7fl l^. throttling - 91 - 1. SMART #} } SMARTS Stl . SMARTS SMART oMfe- (annular space)cH] 12 7l|7> SMARTS 2*]- 43., safe ^^oi sa - 92 - H^| 5-9 SMART 7}), - 93 - f. SMART 44 12 41 SMARTS ^^ 3.71 7f 717]§ , *> 4 -§-715. SMART 10m, - 94 - * Hi •SSDH Flange Upper Cylinder Lower Cylinder Bottom Head H.^ 5-10 SMART - 95 - 1. 2. S5I= 3. 5. =£?|^§}l ti 6. S^»^ SAIS OlSStH tfi 7. HHS(drain) 9. §S¥ SAII io. xtisaAi s^aws tt 11. tfe! SE3AIS XHSSE3II ini 12. icHg^esxi axi? 13. 14. Segment Gate 15. !7>gK?l2l 16. 3h£:41&![H tfi 17. 18. infelSI^^I iufi a^J 5-11 ^^-§-7) 717) SMART 71, ^-^ 5-12). -§-71 - 96 - 5-12 SMART SMART 3.7]} - 97 - 4 -f^^ xma sis ZLQ 5-13 SMART - 98 - 2. 7(1* SMARTS 7] 7H ^g.^ SMARTS SMARTS 7im*f 91 1) SMART 91 ^l^l^-^l-, 7f 91 2) - 99 - |^ SMARTS .S. (regulations, codes & standards) SMART 4i} 7B^ 2D & 3D ^], #4 91 ^] H^l^fl HM IDEAS S^ 2D & 3D S^ 4^^ } 4 2) 7H^ -S.4i 3^}-?i S'i 7H^ ?J Assemble 7f[^ A4i 717HS. 3H*i 3^f^ S^# IDEAS S^ assemble *>Sln>. o| IDEAS SHf A}-g-^}<^ 2D & 3D 3. - 100 - 2) € ^71717} *l }IL3. 7}7] 3) ^S. 7171 91 7171, 91 (4) 91 5) IDEAS 3..E. 91 ANSYS ^S. - 101 - ^|] 5-10). ^n 5-14 - 102 - ro-coupled) (6) "A a^ 5-15). ZL^ 5-15 Routing - 103 - 7) *x]/JL^ 7fl\i ^l^g^ iM i B lMg]l MK^£- 15 71, 8) B o>^sH^# sf]# 9) SMARTS , ^.513. 4 SMARTS ^^-^-#cHl tfl^}^ 71^ 91 ^7HA^. 4^, 44 7}V8, - 104 - 5-16). •=?•« CEDM MCP RV PZR 740 CS8 1 754 SG Outer Disptacer x,i,Rx,Rz 622 II -v* 810 Full so Fun FA 640 a <+ - • • -#' CORE STRUCT. SIOE SCREEN ZL^ 5-16 SMART - 105 - 2) SMART 3) IDEAS, ANSYS, ABAQUS, ADLPIPE -§-5] 3£f workstation^! -i^|*>3. ^ gj c(o|T5] ^-8- benchmarking^ ^«H Jl^-^ ^>t> ^sfl^i ^^# £fe network^- ^^B 7]7l - 106 - 2) SMART CAD/CAM W HH ^ ^1 fgf ]^ a^af IDEAS*] IDEAS# 3) K-Annulus 3£ 7fl1£ SMART ^ (hydro-coupled) ^ K-Annulus 3H§ 7)| Windows-g- H^.ZL^^.5. 7Vi^°M, £-& 9l benchmarking - 107 - SMART #] £ H]\§ ^H QQ £^]^ fl*Hr ^ |l J 4Hl ^ll ^#R ^^14^1 ^fe SMART 7l7l# ^^H ^^^^1711 ^8^. gl 21M-KM- ^^-*}$it:>. ^.elU TMI VDU -^^ U]^l#7l7l# 7l«>^.S. ^^l^lfe SMART SMART [28]. lfe SMARTS ^l^ *Hfe SMART SMART ^^171711^711^ ^1*11-71711- ^ - 108 - 1) ^3 SMART 2) SMART SMART ^#0) 7>^^i^- ^^B)l- o}-§-*> . 0} 71, SMARTS Tfl-f-. (Critical Function)^] 7|7iq- 717] TL^l^ , 71 %>, 7)71 - 109 - : SMART 3g.fi.*> : SMARTf- SMART ^1H^ ^K SMART f. [30] 2. SMARTS 4 4 4-S- ^ SMART 7}. 1 ^l^ ^^11^ 4%f^f |1H SMART J f) SMART 51 - 110 - ESF R.G. 1.97 Category 1 FPD, , 2 7]71 JE.Jp- ol^S]-^ ^-^# 7} FPD gl FPD 14. - m - VDU (Visual Display Unit) cflo] VDU , VDU IEEE 279^ IEEE 603^1 aj-g-ofl IEEE 7-4.3.2 - 112 - 2) S.^ J&€- 7171 JEfe - 113 - o NSSS *> Tfl o NSSS NSSS NSSS . NSSS o BOP o BOP ^ BOP ATWS(Anticipated Transient Without Scram)£| ^^# 3z|e]-7l l 7] 2) ^r NSSS, B0P# 3.71] ^ B0P^|«H7lI-f-^S. NSSS ^: 4 NSSS A - 114 - o SMART el, Ef MMIS ^71), 2) *> , NSSS - 115 - «>. 4*1 1) , 4 2) - 116 - 4. SMARTS 3. ^: MMIS 1) , ©4 2) ^- MMIS o Tll^ZL - 117 - -A, B, C, 3. MMIS 44*1 - 118 - . [34] Touch-screeno]v> Non-hardwired . SMART - 119 - M^H7lfe SMART 7)»}±S. SMART MMIS l MMIS l-fe IBM 4 Mbps^J- 16 Mbps^ o 5 - 120 - : SMART : MMIS EMI/RFI SMART SMART ^H^^r ^^j-^r^iA] 1^] ^^o| 7^*].£^. ^^^ ^ VDU f. SMART heatup) ^f lt:f. SMART SMARTS - 121 - u] Cjfu| ZL o] -122 - 1. SMARTS Af§-5|fe £ JE 5-32J- section^ ttfe ^ PT-7M ^ ^-#^ PT-3VS A safe - 123 - SMARTS 5-3 SMART ^^1 7}^*> Section ^ 4 #<£^ ^W*!*!, mm 17 #7l«^7l 7M1S ^ 12 3^-g ^^*o> 31*1, mm 13. S 6 15,8 324 ^^^ -frJL^ol, mm 2800 54 168.8 z 17 ^^}^ -frS ^>^^, m 0r1054 o)^}^ ^-S #^, m2 0.0206 5^^/^^^^ mm 182/726 ^i^ ^l^x^^l, mm 12x1.5 ?ii ^/sl*l mm 2/3.5 ^ ti e ^^^ 4 o^ ^1*1, mm 13.5 ^ o\ kgf 2000 - 124 - H^ 5-17 SMART - 125 - Instability Rat Resonance Rat O IV) o en o cn o IJ U rfE en i i 1—4 00 lift rii =10 CD I* ofn IV) cn 2. SMARTS ^44^%^^(MCP)^ Q*}SL Wofl 4^7} o] ^sj-fe <5HS.E|(axial canned motor )^ 4f^5 ^K >*MMi3H*|Sl £_#£. ^ I982m3/h, ^ 13.5m, *Hf£.£. 31O°C, 15MPa, ^ ^^^O 08Crl8NilOTiolt:f. ^ A - 127 - SMARTS 4tflii] 75%^ DCA{Double Circular Arc) ^fe 60[Hz], 7]$] $.-£-8: 0.8, ^-i- 0.8# 71^*3. fl-b 0.6[mm], Sl^>^ ^g-ffe 0.5[mm 5,3. «^|fe a ^ 3-tf 440[V] IGBTS. 7HJ , SVPWMS - 128 - TMS320F240 DSP 15/60HZ-& #^ MCP IBM CATIA . MCP - 129 - m (a) 5-20 SMART - 130 - g -ex "* " *• ..,£ ~*""2 """"I * H^ 5-21 MCP - 131 - Experimental Value FEM 250- 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 Speed [rpm] H.^ 5-22 - 132 - 3. SMART-g- 3.7} CAD/CAE ^^r ^HS^H^l I-DEAS 3£ l^ 5-24) 9S #^3.^-^ 4^-g-^-^^K^-^ 5-25)^ ^«g*V9lt>. ^J2. 3.7] 180° cs. -B 5-26^1 A] Ji^. Hfif ^Oj ^^^ ^-Ajol 4^] ^.Ufe 47i) U}^ln} 5% 5-27*1- - 133 - 4 3.5.3, (Electron - 134 - - 135 - 1500 2,000AT // NLJ 1.500AT | / / <^ 1000 Q / / / s r A aJLJ 1.D00AT1 Y 2 r w\ ff \ 500 H l\ /A i \\ If \ # - Catatetioiifof2D /I -+--I- Experiment I I 1 1 1 1- \ 3 4 5 Displacement [mm] 5-26 2000 g iooo Displacement [mm] D.^ 5-27 - 136 - 4. «^HJ 4ss^ ja.^-51^ ^1-7)^ j^af i|JM l 4 ^ Cr 18°^ type 430F 430FRO) -dj- brazing^ wettabilityl- Brazing# ^1*1 ^f7f - 137 - nit SMART 7fl1**K2. &b SMART SMART£) 3.-8 SMART SMART "^ SMART 7] SMARTS SMART ^>^^-^i ^7fl7l^-A]-3.£)- <^^J&-^€r SMART J2.xH*M ANSI/ANS-51.1-1983(R1988)[36]# 7l§AS Frequency^ ^t> ^i^>S. ^BH (Plant Condition) ^^7} SL 5-4<^l LJ $iuf. 44 ^7]43.fe ^^4-t^ # 5-4 Plant Condition Plant Condition Reactor Year ^ (PC) ^^ 2j^ AfaL !&$•& (F) 1 2 F > 10"1 3 10"1 > F > 10"2 4 10"2 > F > 10"4 5 10"4 > F > 10"b SMART A}: - 138 - 5-7ofl <%*]#°\ $1^3. SMART JE 5-5 *>JL Plant Condition PC PC PC PC co <;icr2/io(3 CO > 10"2/IO(2) co <;io~2/io<3> PC of 10 CO> 10"2/IO(2> •££ SF ZL2\5L SF n^ai SF 2 2 3 3 4 3 3 4 4 5 4 4 5 5 5 CJ I 5 5 5 CJ I PC - Plant Condition 10 = Initiating Occurrence CO = Coincident Occurrence (-^£ Coincident Occurrence SF = Single Failure SMART (MDNBR) : 1.30 (AECL Look-up Table : 12O4°C : 2804°C (BOC), 2700°C (EOC) 18.7 MPa (^^1^^^ 110%) : 10CFR100 fe SMART - 139 - 3. 5-6 n Plant Condition ^^y-^l }€• *)-§• PC-1 PC-2 PC-3 PC-4 PC-5 a. 3 #£3 A M- A}3i AH 10CFR50 Ap X X X X X pendix I £f 10CFR100 offsite radiolo gical dose-1 ANSI/ANS- £L 51.1-19 83CR1988) . b. 3 #£3*1 4 A}oLA]oil ANSI/ANS X X X X X -51.1-1983 (R1988) €43^3^ ^^[ c. "|uj- A]-j7 A] OI] -^<^^ ^7^1 X X X -jZ|-S|^] ^£.S- ^^-•Sj- *V^ d ^"3^: 3'^•£3 ^l^lfe" ^"# 3#"^ X )] -^X[-S ^i'S 5-7 SMART Increase in heat Removal by the Secondary System Decrease in Feedwater Temperature PC-2 Increase in Feedwater Flow PC-2 Increase in 10% Steam Flow PC-2 Steam Line Break Inside or Outside Reactor Vessel PC-5 - 140 - Decrease in Heat Removal by the Secondary System - Loss of External Load PC-2 - Turbine Trip PC-2 - Steam Isolation Valve Closure PC-2 - Feedwater Isolation Valve Closure PC-2 - Loss of Feedwater Flow PC-2 - Loss of Pressurizer Cooling Water PC-2 - Loss of Condenser Vacuum PC-2 - Feedwater Line Break Inside or Outside Reactor Vessel PC-5 Decrease in Reactor Coolant Flow Rate - Total Loss of Reactor Coolant Flow PC-3 - Reactor Coolant Pump Rotor Seizure PC-4 Reactivity and Power Distribution Anomalies - Unauthorized CG Withdrawal from Subcritical or Low Power Conditions PC-2 - Unauthorized CG Withdrawal at Power PC-2 - CG Drop PC-2 - Loss of Power to CPS PC-2 - CG Ejection PC-5 Increase in RCS Inventory - Inadvertent Operation of the Makeup System PC-2 - Inadvertent Operation of the ECCS PC-2 Decrease in RCS Inventory - Steam Generator Tube Rupture PC-3 - Small Break Loss of Coolant Accident PC-4 Radioactive Material Released from System/Component PC-4 ATWS and Beyond Design Accidents SMART #*}S. &$.7\}i§- 7flVl.gr t\x]rg Ji^Tj]^- (SCOPS : SMART COre Protection System)^S. DNBR^J- LPD (Local Power Density) Q SMART iSTj]^ 7fl^^.^ SMART 7fl^7fl£| ^^^"S-^ il 51 ^J - 141 - 3. #^ : 115% 3. i^l"^ £•£ : 325TC $*] : 80% ^^| : 20% : 16.7 MPa = 12.0 MPa - 3. ol^]^ #7]^^ ^) : 4.0 MPa - *i ^l^H]^ ^-7]^^ ^g^l : 2.0 MPa - MDNBR : 1.30 (AECL Look-up Table) - LPD : 9.99 kw/ft - SCOPS ^ SMART ^^4^# #*> 44^ 43. ^.71^:^^: SMART (LCO : Limiting Core Operational4 ^14*fe ^-^-S. H^^.^^. 7} SMART ANS . ^71 Afci^ ^Alojl oV^Tfl^. ^^3.^"2l- 7171 SMART SMART jn-a-i^i, «?«is. *in, -frm}^ ^4, 714 si 7171 si - 142 - SMART >g7!I$l -^^4 ^ *I#*ll*|-§- tf«M SMART ^l7}]7f 3gA*>i:l-. SMART 7fl^^7|Hl^fe SMART -£7ll7fl\i ^: SMART Hfe SMART ii^-a^ ^-OH1^ Tjf^tl: MATRA[37] 3L^ g-54^ C0NTEMPT4E38] 3.H# SMART H^fl| qg £ H# 1 4S 711^513. S5lfe *1*1 ^1^-^^ S=^l MARS [39] 2Hf 7] H1 MARS/SMR 3Hf £• ^l<>fl>H 7^& ^<^] Sa^>. MARS 3.^ ^. MARS SI=ofl SMART ^>^4^- g| 7l7l %•*]] ^^*} *>JL SMART ^^|oj| tcf^- nodalization-i- CK ^-^rl, SMARTS tt]tflig ^^^^^ | > nodalizationS SMART ^^ 5J ^^sfl^^- ^*H MARS/SMR bundle CHF SJ*l MARS/SMR 3.S< - 143 - 2. SMART 7fl^i|7|] SMART 7^ 4*14^ 7K (1) SMART .^ o} - Keff < 0.95^1 o <>l-§-*H 100% 20% 20% (Keff < 0.95)^1 *> *> SMART - 144 - 7171 (2) SMART , *1 SMART Hitfj^ ^^^ ^^" 3*Hi ^*!H (7f) #^ fe SMARTS 20% #^ Af)) -y-BH^f JL71 -t^l , ^"71 i^^| (BOC, EOC) ofl cH*H 44 100% -* 20%, 20% -> 100% #^ ^Sf# sD^^j-^u} 1Oo% ~ 20% 40 °C °)^ -frxl«fe ^o|t(.. ^fS^i -tlSlfe in. 108 % o]^ ^^ <^^>4# <^^o| 16 100% ~ 20% #^ ^§ ] 4 H^ 5-282f 5-29 %**te SMART 4 ^714^7} 7fe*V ic-a (4^ £#^1 Tfl-M- SMART - 145 - MARS/SMR-j SMARTS 75% 5-30). ZL 75% 1.4- 100% -> 20% 20%-> 100% 1.4 Rx-power (EOC) Rx-|jower (EOC) 1.2- Rx-power (BOC) Rx- :ower (BOC) - 1.2 rnn d flow 1.0- 1.0 0.8- 0.8 o ••2s 0.6- ... 0.6 - 0.4- 0.4 0.2- 0.2 0.0- 0.0 0 160 320 480 640 800 960 1120 1280 1440 time (sec) 5-28. - 146 - 16.4M- 16.4M 100%->2Q % 20% -5•100% 16.2M- EOC - 16.2M 16.0M- BOC BOC 16.0M 15.8M- 15.8M • 15.6M- 15.6M ^ - 1 1 g 15.4M- \^...... 15.4M I" ,-•' •>-• M 15.2M- *., 1 iA// 15.2M N a. / • "^ 15.0M- H 15.0M Q. Vv- ; • \.^ / 14.8M 14.8M- ..•:•.. t 14.6M 14.6M- 14.4M 14.4M - V 14.2M 14.2M- •%' ••'•••'•- 1 ' 1 ' 1 1 14.0M 14.0M - 160 320 480 640 800 960 1120 1280 1440 time (sec) 5-29. Flow Distribution on SG & Downcomer Annulus 7.5 6.5 _ 5.5 ,, 4.5 Xi o> (D 3.5 2.5 B 1.5 0.5 0.0 O.S 1.8 2.7 3.6 4.5 5.4 6.3 7.2 8.1 9.0 9.9 Circumferential Angle :•: 33 5-30. ^ - 147 - -©- Core power -A- FWflow -a- DNBR 0.5- 0.0 0 50 100 150 260 250 360 Time (sec) 5-31. DNBR (3) SMART SMART 40°C , SMART SMART SMART 5-7«Hl SMART . SMART SMART O > ^S.^ SMART - 148 - SMART 71^7^ *$<&& ^# -£*|*}7| $1*H afltUfcZ S]}*j A] 3f 5.AcNl^ DNBR-§- ^H*]-$^h SMART 7l|^^7fl^ DNBR# ^H*> ^ *)ifc DNBR (MDNBRM ^^7]^ sf^AJ-^L A] ^H^B}, MDNBR &o| 1.3655. SMART (2) ^ SMART . SMART 2^35. T^l^^j-^ ^SM- #^*> ^2f ^^-^^ 4^4^-7} O.^ 5-32 18.37 MPaS. SMART 110a; <$^<>\ 18.7 MPa#