DOCSLIB.ORG

Lancashire Local – Lancashire Local – Lancaster District

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Lancashire Local – Lancashire Local – Lancaster District Lancashire Local – Lancashire Local – Lancaster District Tuesday, 22nd January 2008 at 6.30 pm, in the Banqueting Room, Town Hall, Lancaster Agenda Part 1 (Open to Press and Public) No. Item 1. Disclosure of Personal and Prejudicial Interests Members are asked to consider any Personal/Prejudicial Interests they may have to disclose to the meeting in relation to matters under consideration on the Agenda. 2. Minutes of the Special Meeting held on the 26th (Copy enclosed) November 2007 3. Minutes of the Meeting held on the 4th December 2007 (Copy enclosed) Discharge of delegated powers 4. The Lancashire County Council (Exeter Avenue, Cork (Report attached) Road, Canterbury Avenue, Lancaster, Lancaster City) (Prohibition of Waiting) Order 200* 5. Lancashire Local Grants Scheme (Report attached) Other issues for consideration 6. Hest Bank to Morecambe Promenade Cycle Track (Report attached) 7. A589 Morecambe Road (Report attached) Overturning Vehicles at Asda Roundabout 8. Pedestrian Road Safety Awareness Training (Report attached) 9. Emergency Planning – Responding to Civil Presentation by Emergencies Bernard Kershaw, Principal Emergency Planning Officer, Lancashire County Council 10. Directorate for Children and Young People – (Report attached) Redesign of Children’s Integrated Services - 2 - 11. Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services (Report attached) (CAHMS) 12. Children Looked After – Local Statistics and (Report attached) Approaches) 13. Children Missing from Care (Report attached) 14. Programme of Meetings for 2008/09 (Report attached) 15. Forward Business Plan 2007/08 (Report attached) 16. Urgent Business An item of urgent business may only be considered under this heading where, by reason of special circumstances to be recorded in the Minutes, the Chair of the meeting is of the opinion that the item should be considered at the meeting as a matter of urgency. Wherever possible, the Secretary should be given advance warning of any Member’s intention to raise a matter under this heading 17. Date of Next Meeting The next meeting of the Committee will be held on Tuesday, 18th March 2008 at 6.30 pm at Morecambe Town Hall. I M Fisher County Secretary and Solicitor County Hall Preston Lancashire Local – Lancaster District Special Meeting held at 4.00 pm on Monday 26th November 2007 at the Victoria Institute, Caton, Lancaster. Minutes Present:- Councillor Janice Hanson (Chair) Lancashire County Council County Councillor Susie Charles County Councillor C B Coates County Councillor Peter Elliott County Councillor Sarah Fishwick County Councillor County Councillor Niki Penney Lancaster City Council Councillor John Barnes Councillor Eileen Blamire Councillor Tony Johnson Councillor Andrew Kay Councillor David Kerr Councillor R Sherlock Councillor Malcolm Thomas Apologies were presented on behalf of County Councillor Liz Scott and from Councillor Eve Archer. Disclosure of Personal and Prejudicial Interests No disclosures were made. Discharge of delegated Powers There were no items under this heading. Review of the Future of Skerton High School, Hornby High School and Central Lancaster High School A report was presented detailing the background to the decision of the County Council to consult widely on the future of Skerton, Hornby and Central Lancaster High Schools. This report provided information for the Lancashire Local on the new duties under the Education and Inspections Act 2006 to promote diversity and choice, set out the main features of the Academies programme and included, at Appendix “A”, a copy of the consultation 1 document inviting views on the possible closure of Skerton High School and Hornby High School from the 1st September, 2008. It was proposed that Central Lancaster High School would be enlarged for an initial period from the 1st September, 2008 to include the use of the Skerton and Hornby sites. The consultation document explained the proposals and also provided information on Academies and why an Academy might be an appropriate option in Lancaster in the future. Responses were invited by the 31st December and the County Council’s Cabinet Member for Schools would consider the results of the consultation on the 21st January 2008.and decide whether to publish Statutory Notices. There would then be a period for representations to be made on the Statutory Notices and the proposals would be considered further by the Cabinet Member on the 1st April. Mr Stephen Mercer, the County Council’s acting Deputy Director of Childrens’ Strategy and Resources, presented the report and responded to questions and comments from members of the Lancashire Local. Information was presented on each of the high schools under consideration as follows:- Skerton High School - The school served a very disadvantaged population with over 40% of pupils being eligible for free school meals. Contextual value added a measure of the progress pupils make in a school) was the third highest in Lancashire in 2006, when 26% of pupils achieved 5 or more grades A*-C at GCSE (although only about 6% of pupils achieved 5 or more A*-C grades including Maths and English). Provisional GCSE results for 2007 indicated that pupils’ performance at Skerton High School had continued to improve, with 70% of pupils achieving 5 or more grades A*-C at GCSE and over 21% of pupils achieving 5 or more A*-C grades including Maths and English. The school did not have specialist status. The site was also shared with a primary school, nursery class, and other users, including the Adult College, the Traveller Education Service and Lancashire Education Medical Service. Skerton was ranked the 6th most deprived (out of 85) secondary school in Lancashire using the Index of Multiple Deprivation. Hornby High School – The School was located in the Lune Valley to the north east of Lancaster. Very few local pupils attended the school. Most of the pupils travelled from Lancaster, Morecambe and Heysham, where there may be increasing availability of places in other schools as pupil numbers declined. 23 pupils were admitted to Hornby in September 2006, and 24 first preference applications were received for admission in September 2007. Hornby High School's results improved in 2006, with 31% of pupils achieving 5 or more A*- C grades at GCSE, all of these including English and Maths. Provisional GCSE results for 2007 indicated that pupils’ performance at Hornby High School was broadly similar to 2006, with 33% of pupils achieving 5 or more A*-C grades at GCSE and 29% achieving 5 or more A*-C grades including Maths and English. The recent increases in bus fares/withdrawal of subsidised routes had not appeared to have had a major impact on the school. Hornby had a total roll of 174 at January 2007, with 24 pupils in Year 7 and 40 in Year 8. Because of falling pupil numbers in the Lancaster district, 2 the future need for the places at Hornby High School was in doubt. The school catered for a high proportion of pupils with special educational needs. The school does not have specialist status. Hornby was ranked the 27th most deprived (out of 85) secondary school in Lancashire using the Index of Multiple Deprivation. Central Lancaster High School - The school was located to the south of the River Lune. In 2006 the school was judged by Ofsted to be outstanding. The school performed well relative to its intake. Contextual value added was the highest in Lancashire in 2006. Over 52% of pupils achieved 5 or more A*-C grades at GCSE, and 31% achieved 5 or more A*-C grades including English and Maths. Provisional GCSE results for 2007 indicated that 55% of pupils achieved 5 or more A*-C grades at GCSE and 24% of pupils achieved 5 or more A*-C including English and Maths. In 2006/07 the school had 642 pupils on roll. The school was popular, with some upward pressure on pupil numbers. The school was oversubscribed for admissions to Year 7 and from September 2008 the County Council had agreed to a request from the Governing Body to increase the admission number from 130 to 150. The school was in quite poor accommodation and was likely to be a priority for significant capital investment under the Building Schools for the Future (BSF) programme. If Skerton High School and Hornby High School were to close from 31st August, 2008, it would not be possible, from the 1st September 2008, to accommodate all the pupils at the Central Lancaster High School site. It would be necessary to use the sites at Skerton and Hornby for an initial period to cater for the enlarged Central Lancaster High School. Central Lancaster High School would receive additional funding as a split site school. If Skerton and Hornby High Schools closed, some parents in future might send their children to other local schools. As a result, it was likely that Central Lancaster High School would be consolidated on its current site following the initial transition period, with about 150 pupils admitted each year. Comments expressed by Members of the Lancashire Local following Mr Mercer’s presentation were:- • It was noted that the City Council’s Overview and Scrutiny Committee was undertaking a review of the County Council’s proposals following a decision by the County Council’s Overview and Scrutiny Management Committee’s decision not to accede to a request from the Lancashire Local to establish a Joint Task Group to examine secondary education in Lancaster. The City Council’s Committee had yet to report, but this did not preclude the Lancashire Local from registering views of its own for forwarding to the County Council. • When Greaves High School closed some years ago the transitional arrangements made for pupils were similar to those described should Skerton and Hornby High Schools close and appeared to work satisfactorily. At that time transport was provided for those pupils transferred to other schools – it was hoped that similar arrangements would be put in place should Skerton and Hornby schools close.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Report to Appraise the Benefits and Value for Money of a Number of Options, and Generate Benefit to Cost Ratios (Bcrs)
    Queensbury Tunnel Estimating the economic impact of reopening walking and cycling routes around Queensbury Tunnel June 2017 About Sustrans Sustrans makes smarter travel choices possible, desirable and inevitable. We’re a leading UK charity enabling people to travel by foot, bike or public transport for more of the journeys we make every day. We work with families, communities, policy-makers and partner organisations so that people are able to choose healthier, cleaner and cheaper journeys, with better places and spaces to move through and live in. It’s time we all began making smarter travel choices. Make your move and support Sustrans today. www.sustrans.org.uk Head Office Sustrans 2 Cathedral Square College Green Bristol BS1 5DD © Sustrans 2017 Registered Charity No. 326550 (England and Wales) SC039263 (Scotland) VAT Registration No. 416740656 June 2017 Table of contents 1 Executive summary............................................................................................................................1 2 Introduction........................................................................................................................................ 3 Study area............................................................................................................................................. 3 Existing evidence and BCRs from comparative case studies.............................................................. 7 3 Methodology for economic appraisal.................................................................................................9
    [Show full text]
  • Lancaster University Wind Turbine Project Environmental Statement Volume 1
    Lancaster University Wind Turbine Project Environmental Statement Volume 1 January 2010 www.segen.co.uk www.lancs.ac.uk/windturbines © SEGEN LTD ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT VOLUME 1 Preface i. General Notes Project Title: Lancaster University Wind Turbine Project Report Title: Lancaster University Wind Turbine Project Environmental Statement Volume 1 Date of Issue: January 2010 Office Address: Segen Ltd. City Lab 4-6 Dalton Square Lancaster LA1 1PP Produced by: Planning Manager Miss J Peaks Authorised by: Director Mr R Horn This Environmental Statement Volume 1, Environmental Statement Appendices Volume 2 and its Non Technical Summary Volume 3 will be made publically available at the following locations detailed below; • Lancaster City Council Office, Palatine Hall, Dalton Square, Lancaster , LA1 1PW • Lancaster Library, Market Square, Lancaster, LA1 1HY • www.lancs.ac.uk/windturbines Copies of the Environmental Statement including the Non Technical Summary can also be obtained from Segen Ltd. by calling on 01524 590590 or emailing [email protected] or writing to: Segen Ltd. City Lab 4-6 Dalton Square Lancaster LA1 1PP The full Environmental Statement can be purchased for £150.00 per copy. Alternatively full sets of the documents are available free of charge as Adobe Acrobat files on CD-ROM. I © SEGEN LTD ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT VOLUME 1 Glossary ii Abbreviations Abbreviation Description AOD Above Ordnance Datum AONB Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty BAP Biodiversity Action Plan BBC British Broadcasting Corporation BREEAM Building Research
    [Show full text]
  • Cityconnect 3: Bradford–Halifax Greenway
    CITYCONNECT 3: BRADFORD–HALIFAX GREENWAY INC. THE QUEENSBURY TUNNEL BRADFORD TRANSPORT PRIORITIES BRADFORD TRANSPORT PRIORITIES Bradford - THE BIG PICTURE MOST PRODUCTIVE BUSINESSES OF ANY CITY IN THE 534,000 NORTHERN POWERHOUSE PEOPLE 15,700 BUSINESSES BEST PLACE IN THE UK TO START A NEW AN ECONOMY WORTH YOUNGEST CITY BUSINESS IN THE UK £10bn CYCLING INVESTMENT IN BRADFORD DISTRICT Bradford has a record of successful delivery of major cycling events such as the Tour de France and Tour de Yorkshire as well as major cycling infrastructure investment: l Bradford Living Streets Connect 2 (Manchester Road pedestrian and cycle bridge) l CityConnect 1 - Bradford to Leeds l CityConnect 2 - Bradford to Shipley l Leeds-Liverpool canal towpath - Shipley to Leeds, but also to other Principal Towns such as Bingley, Keighley and beyond. Bradford has a young and diverse population but poor health outcomes with too many journeys taken by car, causing congestion and air quality issues across the district. CityConnect 1 has seen usage increase up to 30% in its first year of operation and further investment is needed in the form of CityConnect 3 to maintain this growth, encourage modal shift and improve air quality and public health outcomes. 2 BRADFORD TRANSPORT PRIORITIES BRADFORD TO HALIFAX CONNECTIVITY facilities providing a viable safe cycling opportunity. However, with improvements to create a safe cycle route increased modal transfer can be expected as well as an increased tourism opportunity. Bradford-Calderdale InclusivE Growth Corridor This document outlines the benefits a dedicated We have been working with the West Yorkshire greenway connecting Bradford and Halifax – Combined Authority (WYCA) on developing a number CityConnect 3 – would deliver, unlocking economic of inclusive growth corridors, including Bradford– growth, generating modal shift and improving air quality Calderdale.
    [Show full text]
  • Calderdale Cycling Strategy
    CALDËRDALE CYCLING CYCLING, A WAY ØF STRÅTEGY LIFE IN CÅLDERDALÊ CYCLING, A WAY OF LIFE IN CALDERDALE Find us on Facebook Logo Follow us on Twitter Logo www.cyclecalderdale.co.uk [email protected] Photography by Chris Lord - www.chrislordphotography.co.uk CØNTËNTS Introduction ............................................................................................................4 Our Vision and Objectives ........................................................................... 6 An Overview of Cycling .................................................................................. 8 Challenges to Cycling ...................................................................................10 Opportunities in Cycling ..............................................................................11 Our Targets for Cycling .................................................................................13 Delivering an Integrated Network .......................................................14 Making the Vision a Reality, Delivering our Objectives .....20 Delivering our Promises ...............................................................................31 Measuring Performance .............................................................................32 Cycling a Way of Life ......................................................................................33 Case Studies ........................................................................................................34 3 INTRØDUCTION Calderdale Council recognise
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 6: Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment
    Chapter 6: Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment 6-1 Lancaster University Lancaster University Wind Turbine Project – Environmental Statement Volume 2 6 LANDSCAPE AND VISUAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT 6.1 Introduction This chapter of the ES is based on the findings of a Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment (LVIA) carried out by Stephenson Halliday. The purpose of this chapter is to identify, and where possible quantify, the likely significant effects of the Lancaster University Wind Development on the existing landscape and visual amenity within 30 km of the development site. A full description of the development is provided in Chapter 2 of this document. The main elements of the development considered by this section of the ES are as follows: A single 2 MW wind turbine which will comprise a three bladed, horizontal axis machine with a hub height of approximately 59 m, a blade length of approximately 41 m and a rotor diameter of approximately 82 m, giving a ground to tip height of 100 m; 1.05 km of access tracks (see Figure 2.4 a-c); Underground cable route; and A temporary construction compound and topsoil storage compound. Landscape impacts and visual impacts are separate, but related. Landscape impacts are changes in the fabric, character and quality of the landscape. Visual impacts relate solely to changes in available views of the landscape, and the effects that those changes have on people. Landscape and visual impacts do not necessarily coincide. Impacts can be beneficial as well as adverse. There are three main objectives to the Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment.
    [Show full text]
  • Wakefield Westgate Station Travel Plan 2017
    Wakefield Westgate Station Travel Plan 2017 Change Control Sheet Date Version Information Changed Name of changer Number 16/11/2016 1 Drafted by Sarah Collings Donna Gutteridge 27/2/2017 Feedback from client Donna Gutteridge 1 Contents Wakefield Westgate Station Travel Plan ................................... 3 1 Introduction ........................................................................ 3 2 Development of the STP process ..................................... 4 3 Site overview ........................................................................ 5 Location ......................................................................................................................................... 5 Station Facilities ........................................................................................................................... 6 Current Rail Services provided .................................................................................................. 9 Local demographics .................................................................................................................... 9 Travel to Work data – demographics ...................................................................................... 10 ORR passenger footfall data .................................................................................................... 10 Passenger Surveys ................................................................................................................... 11 4 Existing Travel Network ....................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Fore Consulting
    Appendix C: April 2021 Transport Assessment Quod | Land off Brighouse Road, Hipperholme | Supplementary Environmental Information Note | April 2021 23 Strata Homes Limited Land off Brighouse Road, Hipperholme Transport Assessment 29 April 2021 Version 2.1 Issue 2 Strata Homes Limited 3007 ▪ Land off Brighouse Road, Hipperholme ▪ Transport Assessment 29 April 2021 ▪ Version 2.1 ▪ Issue Contents 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Commission 1 1.2 Purpose of this Report 1 1.3 Structure of this Report 1 2 Existing Situation 3 2.1 Site Location 3 2.2 Pedestrian Access 3 2.3 Cycle Access 5 2.4 Public Transport 6 2.5 Local Highway Network 7 3 Transport and Planning Policy 9 3.1 National Policy 9 3.2 Planning Practice Guidance 10 3.3 Local Policy 11 3.4 Summary 13 4 Development Proposals 14 4.1 Land Use 14 4.2 Pedestrian and Cycle Access 14 4.3 Vehicular Access 14 4.4 Remediation and Construction 15 4.5 Travel Plan 16 5 Trip Generation and Distribution 17 5.1 Introduction 17 5.2 Vehicle Trip Generation 17 5.3 Trip Distribution and Assignment 17 6 Existing and Future Traffic Flows 19 6.1 Introduction 19 6.2 Traffic Surveys 19 6.3 Assessment Periods 19 6.4 Assessment Years and Traffic Growth 20 6.5 Committed Developments 20 6.6 Assessment Scenarios 20 ii Strata Homes Limited 3007 ▪ Land off Brighouse Road, Hipperholme ▪ Transport Assessment 29 April 2021 ▪ Version 2.1 ▪ Issue 7 Impact on the Local Highway Network 22 7.1 Introduction 22 7.2 Site Access Junction 22 7.3 Brighouse Crossroads 23 7.4 Sensitivity Test 26 7.5 Road Safety 30 8 Impact on the Strategic
    [Show full text]
  • Great Northern Railway Trail
    Great Northern Railway Trail To Haworth To Keighley 29 B64 To Harden and Bingley When you are on Harden & Bingley the National Cycle Caravan Park Network you will Advisory route see these signs. for pedestrians B 61 44 Cullingworth Goit Stock Waterfalls 1 4 Cullingworth Viaduct 29 64 B Advisory route ay w for pedestrians dle Bri Calder Aire Link A6 29 Hewenden Viaduct (Grade II listed) B 2 61 To 44 Wilsden Hebden Hewenden Bridge Reservoir Harecroft R OAD STATION Advisory route for cyclist Advisory route for pedestrians B6144 Denholme The Great Northern Railway Trail) Doe Park Reservoir 5 Water Sports Centre Advisory route Advisory route for pedestrians for cyclist A 6 2 9 Egypt Wellhead Tunnel A view of Hewenden viaduct Br ontë Way Advisory route for pedestrians Advisory route for cyclist Brontë Wa B6145 y A644 Thornton Brontë’s Birthplace 3 6 Advisory route for pedestrians Thornton Viaduct B 6145 Buse to Bradfors d y ADLEY LANE a HE W ë t n o r B A 6 4 4 NE LA IN K C O C Advisory route for pedestrians Clayton To Bradford A 64 7 Queensbury Great Northern Trail 4 4 On-road / Traffic-free 6 A Advisory route D Linking routes A for pedestrians O R E Proposed routes S U O H Bridleways G I R B Footpaths Access point Pelican crossing Pegasus crossing 4 4 Local attraction 6 A Caravan park Public house Café 0 Miles 0.5 1 1.5 Contains Ordnance Survey data © Crown copyright and database right 2012 Cartography © CycleCity Guides.
    [Show full text]
  • Spen Valley Greenway Leaflet
    Part of the Spring Along National Cycle Network 66 the Greenway This route is a partnership between In Kirklees, West Yorkshire Pauline Monkcom Rotate Trudi Entwistle • • • Kirklees Metropolitan Borough Council • Spen Valley Spen Valley Greenway Forum • Sustrans • Greenway and Ringway Keighley 66 open routes Two 69 proposed traffic-free Publications: 66 Leeds Bradford 68 map area walking and • Central Kirklees Cycling Map & Guide, 2nd Edition cycling Summer 2004 Halifax routes • Spen Valley and North Kirklees Cycling Map & Guide, 66 Dewsbury serving local Summer 2004. 69 63 Pontefract communities The above are available from Tourist Information Centres, Wakefield local libraries, Kirklees Information Points or telephone: 67 Huddersfield ROSS - Kirklees Street Care 0800 731 8765. Rochdale • Spen Valley Greenway Leisure Rides, Excellent Books 2003. Price £1.00 Available from Sustrans, Tourist Information Centres, The National Cycle Network is a comprehensive network local libraries, Kirklees Information Points or tel: of safe and attractive routes to cycle throughout the UK. “Excellent Books” 01924 315147 10,000 miles are due for completion by 2005, one third of • Spen Valley Greenway Art & the Travelling Landscape which will be on traffic-free paths, the rest will follow quiet leaflet - with details of all artwork along the Greenway. lanes or traffic-calmed roads. It is delivered through the poli- Available from Sustrans cies and programmes of over 450 local authorities and other partners, and is co-ordinated by the charity Sustrans. Sustrans - the sustainable transport charity - works on practical projects to encourage people to walk, cycle and www.nationalcyclenetwork.org.uk Industrial Gateway Jason Lane use public transport in order to reduce motor traffic and its For more information on routes in your area: adverse effects.
    [Show full text]
  • 2008 National Cycle Network
    SHETLAND ISLANDS The National Cycle Network 1 Stromness Kirkwall Unst 1 � �� 2008 1 John o'Groats Thurso 1 Tongue Lerwick 1 Sumburgh Lairg Tain Cullen Cromarty Buckie Elgin Banff Forres Nairn Turriff Maud Inverness Sustrans is the UK’s leading sustainable 79 7 11 78 1 transport charity, working on practical Carrbridge Broadford Loch Ness Glenelg projects so people choose to travel in ways Aviemore Dyce Fort Augustus Aberdeen Invergarry Kingussie that benefit their health and the environment. Newtonmore Cairngorms National Park 79 Loch Lochy Stonehaven 78 For more information about Sustrans and the National 7 Fort William Blair Atholl Cycle Network, to become a Sustrans Supporter or to 11 Pitlochry Montrose buy maps, guides and other items to improve your 1 Aberfeldy walking and cycling journey visit www.sustrans.org.uk Dunkeld 7 Arbroath or call 0845 113 00 65. Killin 77 Dundee Oban Taynuilt Carnoustie Loch Lomond Monifieth & the Trossachs 11 Perth National Park Leuchars 78 St Andrews 63 Keep up to date with the progress of Connect2 at Callander 1 Tarbert 1 76 74 www.sustransconnect2.org.uk Aberfoyle 63 Glenrothes Alloa Crinan 40 7 Stirling 64 Dunfermline Kirkcaldy 75 76 11 Falkirk Edinburgh Dumbarton 43 Clydebank Musselburgh 76 Tarbert Greenock 75 Bathgate 75 Kilmacolm Glasgow 78 73 Airdrie Balerno Dalkeith Lochwinnoch Livingston Claonaig Paisley 12 Hamilton Penicuik 1 Lochranza 7 Berwick-upon-Tweed 74 Kilwinning Carstairs Junction Ardrossan 73 Irvine 82 78 Kilmarnock Galashiels 1 1 Bamburgh Brodick Troon Melrose 1 Wooler 68 Abington
    [Show full text]
  • Tunnel Condition Under Scrutiny
    Wednesday 27th September 2017 Tunnel condition under scrutiny Plans are being developed for a programme of investigations to gain deeper insight into the condition of Queensbury Tunnel which campaigners hope to reopen as part of a cycle path network. As things stand, Highways England’s Historical Railways Estate (HRE) - which acts as custodian of the disused railway tunnel on behalf of the Department for Transport - could begin work to abandon the 1.4-mile long structure next summer. This will involve infilling critical parts of it with concrete in a project likely to cost around £3 million. Funding will come from the taxpayer. For the cycle path proposal to go ahead, ownership would have to be taken on by Bradford Council, with the £3 million also being transferred as a dowry to cover future maintenance work. However there is a huge disparity between existing estimates for the repairs needed to make the tunnel fit for public use. Last year, a high-level desk study by HRE’s consultants put the cost at more than £35 million; however specialist engineers acting for the Queensbury Tunnel Society visited the tunnel in June 2016 and thereafter developed a 44-week programme of works for £2.8 million. The new investigations will be funded by HRE and their cost deducted from the £3 million dowry in the event of a transfer going ahead. However, to ensure their independence, the scope of works will be defined by Bradford Council who will also appoint a suitably experienced company to undertake them. Progress will be made over the coming months.
    [Show full text]