DOCSLIB.ORG

Briefing Note

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Briefing Note Briefing note The Boards of Directors of “la Caixa” and Criteria approve the terms of the Group's reorganization Criteria net profit up 38% in 2010 to €1.82 billion Recurring net profit up 21%. The Board of Directors resolves to submit a proposal for shareholder approval to pay a final dividend equivalent to €0.051 per share, which shareholders may choose to receive in cash or shares. Total shareholder remuneration in 2010 of €0.311 per share. Barcelona, February 25, 2011 The Boards of Directors of "la Caixa" and Criteria have approved terms of the "la Caixa" group's reorganization. "la Caixa" will transfer its banking business to Criteria (which will become a banking group, changing its name to CaixaBank), while Criteria will transfer some of its industrial holdings (Gas Natural Fenosa, Abertis, Aguas de Barcelona, PortAventura and Mediterránea Beach & Golf Community) to a new entity fully owned by “la Caixa.” The new entity will also oversee Servihabitat and other real estate businesses “la Caixa”, which will continue to be a savings bank, will be CaixaBank's majority shareholder, with 81.1% of its share capital. This will allow it to indirectly continue its banking activities (see Appendix I). The final terms of the transaction have been reviewed by the Independent Committee (an ad hoc Board committee) composed of independent directors of Criteria. This committee has obtained fairness opinions from Citigroup and Société General, which confirm the fairness ‐ under a financial point of view‐ of the proposed transaction for Criteria's minority shareholders. CaixaBank will start off with over 5,400 offices, and will have the lowest NPL ratio (3.71%), the most comprehensive NPL coverage (70%) and the highest core capital ratio (10.9%, according to Basle II, after the issuance of €1.5bn of mandatory convertible bonds) amongst the major Spanish groups. This core capital level fully complies with the requirements of the new plan announced by the Spanish government (Plan de Reforzamiento del Sector Financiero). In addition, CaixaBank will also have other complementary activities. These include the insurance business (VidaCaixa Holding), the holdings in international banks (The Bank of East Asia, Erste, GF Inbursa, Boursorama and BPI) and the holdings in Telefónica and Repsol (see Appendix II). 1 This reorganization process is expected to be completed before the end of August 2011, once the required regulatory approvals are obtained. A General Assembly of “la Caixa” and a General Shareholders' Meeting of Criteria will be called soon to approve the process (see Appendix III). With this, Criteria has made significant inroads in delivering on the commitment made during the October 2007 IPO to strongly increase Criteria's exposure to the financial sector through projects of maximum solvency. In the new structure, financial assets will represent around 75% of CaixaBank's total value. 2010: results underscore the company's excellent progress Criteria CaixaCorp reported a 38% increase in net profit in 2010 to €1.82 billion. Consolidated net recurring profit rose 21% to €1.42 billion, driven by the solid recurring earnings of the Criteria's high quality investees. Profits from affiliates rose 22% to €1.63 billion. By business line, profits from the international banking portfolio soared 65% to €283 million. Meanwhile, profits from the insurance portfolio increased 25% to €267 million. Finally, the services portfolio continued to showcase its resilience, with an 8% increase in profit (to €1.06 billion). Net non‐recurring profit in the year reached €399 million, thanks above all to the €588 million in tactical disposals from the services portfolio (0.86% of Repsol, 0.74% of Gas Natural, 0.44% of Abertis and 0.282% of Telefónica), generating attributable net profit of €162 million. Also contributing were the €162 million of gains on the sale of Agbar and the takeover of Adeslas, on June 7, which represented a net cash outflow of €527 million. The sale of the operational leasing business in December 2010 for €62 million (net gain of €50 million) and the attributable portion of non‐recurring profits of investees, mainly Gas Natural, also contributed. Finally, Criteria recognized €21 million of net provisions, mainly for its banking affiliates. Criteria's financial portfolio accounted for 37% of the company's gross asset value (GAV) at the end of 2010. Since the IPO, the weight of financial assets has increased by more than 20 percentage points, enabling the company to meet its objective of rebalancing the asset mix to emphasize financials, while maintaining investments deemed strategic and of particular interest in services. Criteria’s net asset value (NAV) at December 31, 2010 stood at €17.24 billion, with NAV per share of €5.13. GAV was €23.06 billion, 80% of which corresponded to Criteria's listed portfolio. Net debt ended the year at €5.82 billion, equivalent to 25% of GAV; the company's commitment is to keep this ratio below 30%. Criteria's long‐term debt ratings are A and A2 by Standard & Poor’s (S&P) and Moody's, respectively. 2 The corporate reorganization has prompted both S&P and Moody’s to put their ratings under review for a possible upgrade. Criteria's share performed strongly in 2010, notching up a 20.8% gain and easily beating the main benchmark indices. The Ibex 35 slumped 17.4%, while the Eurstoxx50 closed the year down 5.8%. The total return including dividends would be 28%. Criteria is one of the few Ibex 35 to end 2010 in the black. Taking the closing price on February 24, 2011, of 5.068 per share, Criteria is up 27.27% year‐to‐date in 2011. Criteria’s outperformance of the Ibex showcases the stock’s defensive traits and long‐term value. We would also highlight Criteria’s outperformance of the Ibex35 since its listing. From the date of its IPO on October 10, 2007 until yesterday’s close (February 24, 2011), Criteria’s share price has outperformed the Ibex by 24.9 percentage points. Meanwhile, considering the total €0.691 per share gross dividends paid out as of today, shareholders participating in the October 2007 IPO will have achieved a positive return on their investment. Major deals show the investment group's proactivity Criteria carried out a number of transactions in 2010 that bolstered its position in different areas while actively managing the portfolio. Criteria raised its stake in The Bank of East Asia (BEA) to 14.9% in the first quarter, before taking it to over 15% by the end of the year. In addition, on June 7, the company completed the deal with Agbar and French social insurer Malakoff Médéric that had been announced jointly with Suez Environnement on October 22, 2009. Under the deal, Criteria acquired 99.77% of the shares of Adeslas (Spain's leading health insurance company) for €1.19 billion, to merge it with SegurCaixa, the non‐life insurance company owned by SegurCaixa Holding. As a result of the Adeslas acquisition, Criteria sold Suez Environnement a 24.5% stake in Agbar, raising the French company’s holding to 75.01%. Criteria still owns 24.03% of Agbar. Meanwhile, hedging arrangements (equity swaps) were made in the first half over 1.03% of Telefónica. The move strengthened the strategic nature of Criteria’s stake in Telefónica, which stood at 5.03% at December 31. There were also tactical disposals in the year from the services portfolio totaling €588 million, as detailed above. In December, within the framework of the agreement to integrate the vehicle leasing business in Arval (a BNP Paribas Group company), Criteria transferred CaixaRenting to “la Caixa” for €62 million, generating a net consolidated gain of €50 million. In January of 2011, Criteria reached an agreement to sell 50% of VidaCaixa Adeslas Seguros Generales, the non‐life insurance company of "la Caixa," to Mutua Madrileña for €1.08 billion, expected to generate consolidated net gains for the Criteria Group of €450 million. 3 Shareholder remuneration policy: high, recurring dividends Criteria CaixaCorp's shareholder remuneration policy will continue to entail quarterly dividend payments, in March, June, September and December. At its meeting yesterday, the Board of Directors resolved to submit a proposal at the next Annual General Meeting (tentatively in May 2011) to appropriate retained earnings in 2010 to voluntary reserves. It also intends to propose an increase in share capital with a charge to unrestricted reserves from retained earnings of approximately €172 million (€0.051 per share), as part of the new shareholder remuneration scheme. Under the new scheme, shareholders will have three choices: 1. to receive shares issued in the bonus share issue; 2. to receive cash from the sale of rights to the share on the market; and 3. to receive cash from the sale to Criteria CaixaCorp of the rights to the issue at a price to be determined by Criteria, which in effect means receiving an amount equivalent to the dividend. They can also combine these options. The first of the optional remuneration schemes, which replaces the traditional final dividend, is expected to take place in June 2011. Criteria plans to extend this new formula in substitution of future dividends. The total shareholder remuneration in 2010 of €0.311 per share breaks down as follows: Dividend Type €/share Approval date Payment date Charge to reserves Ordinary 0.06 19‐05‐10 1‐03‐11(1) 3rd interim div. 2010 Extraordinary 0.08 2‐12‐10 11‐01‐11 2nd interim div. 2010 Ordinary 0.06 4‐11‐10 1‐12‐10 1st interim div. 2010 Ordinary 0.06 29‐07‐10 1‐09‐10 Bonus share increase €/share Approval date Payment date 0.051 AGM (2) June ‐ 2011(1) (1) Expected payment date (2) Pending approval at the AGM Within the reorganization of the “la Caixa” group, the new CaixaBank will follow Criteria's shareholder remuneration policy, distributing a dividend of at least €0.231 per share in 2011.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Cuentas Anuales E Informe De Gestión Correspondientes Al Ejercicio 2009
    SOCIEDAD GENERAL DE AGUAS DE BARCELONA, S.A. CUENTAS ANUALES E INFORME DE GESTIÓN CORRESPONDIENTES AL EJERCICIO 2009 1 ÍNDICE Página Balances de Situación al 31 de diciembre de 2009 y 2008 ................................................................................ 3 Cuentas de Pérdidas y Ganancias correspondientes a los ejercicios anuales terminados el 31 de diciembre de 2009 y 2008 .................................................................................................. 4 Estados de Cambios en el Patrimonio Neto de los ejercicios anuales terminados el 31 de diciembre de 2009 y 2008 ................................................................................................. 5 Estados de Flujos de Efectivo correspondientes a los ejercicios anuales terminados el 31 de diciembre de 2009 y 2008 ..................................................................................................................... 6 1. Actividad de la Sociedad y Acuerdos de Principios entre accionistas de referencia ................................... 7 2. Bases de presentación de las cuentas anuales......................................................................................... 10 3. Dividendos y distribución de resultados..................................................................................................... 11 4. Normas de registro y valoración ................................................................................................................ 12 5. Inmovilizado intangible..............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Antitrust & Competition Insight
    Antitrust & Competition Insight In association with Hogan & Hartson LLP December 2007 In association with: Contents Foreword Page 2 United States M&A Antitrust: A Round-up of 2007 Page 3 Regional Round-Ups Page 11 European M&A Antitrust: A Round-up of 2007 Page 14 Plotting the paths of the Tele Atlas/TomTom and Navteq/Nokia mergers Page 22 Live Deals Timetable Page 24 Part of The Mergermarket Group www.mergermarket.com 80 Strand 895 Broadway #4 Suite 2001 London, WC2R 0RL New York Grand Millennium Plaza United Kingdom NY 10003, USA 181 Queen’s Road, Central Hong Kong t: +44 (0)20 7059 6100 t: +1 212 686-5606 t: +852 2158 9700 f: +44 (0)20 7059 6101 f: +1 212 686-2664 f: +852 2158 9701 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Foreword Welcome to this eighth edition of the Antitrust & Competition Insight – brought to you by mergermarket in association with leading international law firm Hogan & Hartson LLP. The report that brings you an update on the key deals and gives a comprehensive round up of European M&A issues affecting M&A activity in North America, Europe antitrust developments, this can be found on page 14. In and beyond. We hope that this quarterly newsletter will the final article on page 22,dealReporters’s regulatory provide corporate, advisory and investor readers with timely, correspondents Sandra Pointel and Ben Bschor look at the informed and objective intelligence. European Commission and vertical integration in the portable navigation industry, In addition, the Antitrust & Competition Insight leverages off mergermarket’s sister company dealReporter – We hope you find this latest edition of interest.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2008-2009
    ANNUAL REPORT 2008 2009 ANNUAL REPORT 2008 2009 Contents Message From the Dean I 5 Bold Strides Forward I 6 Renewing Organizational Landscapes I 16 Beyond Theory to Practice I 26 Sustaining Relationships I 32 Financial Report I 40 Exhibits I 59 MESSAGE FROM THE The 2008-2009 academic year unfolded amid growing challenges DEAN in the global economic landscape. The climate of uncertainty that pervaded much of the world — coupled with the slow pace of recovery — nonetheless revealed new opportunities for IESE. With an entrepreneurial mindset, IESE aligned its portfolio of executive programs to current economic realities. Our program offerings responded to the wide-ranging questions of alumni and friends about how best to meet current challenges and prepare for the future. New and ongoing programs offered new perspectives, practical strategies, and encouraging support. The overall upswing in participation we saw this year refl ected, we believe, a global awareness of the need for new paradigms. Our response was to encourage business leaders to step back, take a fresh look, innovate and move forward with strength of purpose and optimism. At IESE, we have never been more acutely aware of the role companies play in fueling economic and social progress. We see it as our global social responsibility to develop business leaders with integrity and service orientation: leaders who hold themselves accountable, who value their people, and who recognize that personal and organizational development feed societal growth. As we continue to seize new opportunities for a better future, we are gratifi ed by the dedication of our superlative faculty, administrators, and staff.
    [Show full text]
  • Utterly Uncompetitive - the Home Lands of Eternal Water Privatisations
    Public Services International Research Unit (PSIRU) www.psiru.org Utterly uncompetitive - The home lands of eternal water privatisations By David Hall and Emanuele Lobina March 2012 [email protected] and [email protected] 1. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................1 Table 1. Private water contracts – no competition ..........................................................................................1 2. MARSEILLE: A MICROCOSM ...................................................................................................................1 Chart A. Profitability of Société des Eaux de Marseille ..............................................................................2 3. COUNTRIES ....................................................................................................................................................2 3.1. THE UK: A COMPETITION-FREE ZONE.........................................................................................................2 3.2. SPAIN: LAND OF ETERNAL CONCESSIONS ...................................................................................................2 3.3. FRANCE: AN EXCLUSIVE AND SELF-PERPETUATING OLIGOPOLY ................................................................3 4. NOTES ..............................................................................................................................................................4 1. Introduction Private
    [Show full text]
  • Water Tower Tags
    Corporations / Agencies 1. The World Bank The World Bank is an international financial institution that was established at the Bretton Woods Conference in 1944 to help reconstruct post WWII Europe. For the past 50 years the World Bank has transitioned to providing loans to governments in developing countries in order to improve infrastructure. In theory this may sound innocuous, but World Bank policies have devastated local and indigenous communities and increased the developing world’s debt crisis. Indebted nations who wish to borrow money from the World Bank have to agree to a number of structural adjustment plans and privatization measures that have including the privatization of publicly owned water and sanitation utilities. As a governing body the World Bank is less than democratic. Decisions rest in the hands of members from wealthy nations and 51% of the funding for the World Bank comes from the US Treasury, making the World Bank an arm of US foreign policy. In short, the World Bank has escalated neo-liberal policies by promoting unfettered free markets, export-oriented economies, reduced protections for domestic industries, weakened labor laws, and slack environmental standards. 2. Veolia Environnement Veolia, based in France, and previously named Vivendi Environnement, is the largest water and waste-water corporation in the world and a major benefactor of World Bank privatization schemes. Veolia earned more than $48 billion in revenue in 2007 and operates in over 67 countries in Europe, North America, China, North Africa, and the Middle East where it services over 110 million people. Veolia’s US subsidiary Veolia Water North America is the largest water contractor in the US despite substandard service.
    [Show full text]
  • 2003 Sustainability Report of the Agbar Group 2003
    Sustainability Report of the Agbar Group 2003 Sustainability Report of the Agbar Group 2003 INDEX Presentation and field Statement of the Chairman 6 Vision and strategy 10 Profile The Agbar Group 14 Water 14 Health 17 Inspection and Certification 18 Construction and Installations 20 About the Report 24 Governance structure and engagements Governance structure 30 Organisation engagements 32 Stakeholder engagement 36 Environmental performance Environmental indicators 40 Environmental proactive actions 55 Outstanding projects in environmental research 62 Social performance Social indicators 66 Social proactive actions 75 Economic performance Economic indicators 82 Environmental information 89 Annexes Glossary 92 Questionnaire 97 Presentation and field Statement of the Chairman 6 Vision and strategy 10 STATEMENT OF THE CHAIRMAN Just like in our first Report, we have followed the guide proposed by the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) to inform about the impact of our activities on the environmental, social and economic areas. The GRI model has been recognised by the Global Compact as a Committee of the Agbar Group which suitable tool to express the fulfilment of the promotes, among other projects, those principles included in this Compact by the specific to the following three groups: organisations that, like ours, have joined it. customers and public in general, employees and suppliers. This Committee is reflecting on The publication of the second Sustainability how to establish a more fruitful dialogue for Report of the Agbar Group confirms our everyone, which must result in the desire of maintaining the communicative improvement of already existing initiatives transparency with all our stakeholders. and/or the implementation of new projects.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2017
    Annual Report 2017 www.iam.cl Inversiones Aguas Metropolitanas 1 Annual Report 2017 1. 2017 Highlights 5. 2017 Financial Year Statistics and Indicators .................................................4 Planning a Sustainable and ........................................30 Index Financial Summary ............................................................4 Long-Term Management Operating Background Information ............................4 Comprehensive Water Cycle Management ...........31 2017 Revenue Distribution ..............................................5 Annual Investments ...................................................... 35 Stock Exchange Performance .......................................5 2017 Clients ....................................................................... 36 Ebitda - Ebitda Margin .....................................................6 Workforce ...........................................................................37 2017 Investments ...............................................................6 Safety Indices ................................................................... 38 Accident Rate ...................................................................... 7 Environment ...................................................................... 39 2. Letter from the Chairman 6. Financial Management Strength and Stability ....................................................41 3. The Company Risk Factors ....................................................................... 42 Inversiones Aguas Metropolitanas,
    [Show full text]
  • Water Country Profiles
    Water country profiles UK France Germany Canada Australia United States New Zealand Spain Angola South Africa Italy © 2014 Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited. Water country profiles Angola Angola has a diverse hydrological network with considerable water Besides the operational infrastructure, both water management availability (about 8600m3/ year.person). The country has 47 major river infrastructure (e.g. hydrometric stations) and monitoring and control basins and rivers which are distributed across five principal drainage areas: systems (e.g. measuring and billing systems) are scarce, degraded or the Atlantic Ocean (which includes Cuanza, Catumbela, Cunene, Chiloango, inefficient. M’Bridge, Keve, Longa and other rivers), the Zaire basin (Congo), the Zambezi basin, the Cuvelai basin (that drains into Etosha Pan) and the Institutional situation and prospects Cubango river basin (that drains into the Okavango delta). The Angolan water sector management and operation is very centralized in the public sphere and under central Angola also shares five international river basins (Congo, Cunene, Cuvelai, administration. Cubango/Okavango and Zambezi). Angola is an upstream state for four international river basins, although in the case of the Zaire (Congo) river The Ministry of Energy and Water establishes water policies and strategies basin, the country is a downstream state. at a national level. Water resources are managed by the recently created, but not yet fully operational, Instituto Nacional de Recursos Hídricos Water and sanitation accessibility: current situation, (National Institute for Water Resources) at national level and by River Basin achievements and goals Management Cabinets (already in place or to be established) at river basin Although Angola is rich in water resources, they are level.
    [Show full text]
  • Antitrust & Competition Insight
    Antitrust & Competition Insight In association with Hogan & Hartson LLP June 2007 In association with: Contents Foreword Page 2 Recent Developments in Private Competition Law Enforcement in Germany Page 3 The Tunney Act Review of Merger Remedies in the US Page 6 Court Denies FTC’s Attempt to Block Western Acquisition of Giant Page 9 Reuters/Thomson to Face Lengthy Competition Scrutiny on Both Sides of the Atlantic Page 12 Regional Round-Ups Page 14 District Court Rejects FTC Challenge to Regulated Utilities’ Merger Page 19 Live Deals Timetable Page 22 Part of The Mergermarket Group www.mergermarket.com 80 Strand 895 Broadway #4 Suite 2001 London, WC2R 0RL New York Grand Millennium Plaza United Kingdom NY 10003, USA 181 Queen’s Road, Central Hong Kong t: +44 (0)20 7059 6100 t: +1 212 686-5606 t: +852 2158 9700 f: +44 (0)20 7059 6101 f: +1 212 686-2664 f: +852 2158 9701 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] © mergermarket 2007 Antritrust & Competition Insight – 1 Foreword Welcome to this sixth edition of the Antitrust & Competition Insight – brought to you by mergermarket in association with leading international law fi rm Hogan & Hartson LLP. The report that brings you an update on the key deals and Meanwhile, Sandra Pointel, dealReporter’s regulatory issues affecting M&A activity in North America, Europe correspondent examines the antitrust issues surrounding the and beyond. We hope that this quarterly newsletter will Reuters/Thomson merger in both Europe and North America provide corporate, advisory and investor readers with timely, on page 12.
    [Show full text]
  • Politics of Water Nov 17
    THE UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO THE POLITICS OF WATER: PRIVATIZING WATER AND SANITATION UTILITIES IN ARGENTINA AND CHILE A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF THE DIVISION OF THE SOCIAL SCIENCES IN CANDIDACY FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY DEPARTMENT OF SOCIOLOGY BY MARIA AKCHURIN CHICAGO, ILLINOIS DECEMBER 2015 Dissertation Abstract Over the past thirty years, Latin America has been the site of substantial efforts to privatize urban water and sanitation services. As a consequence of these privatization experiments, the state shifted from running water utilities to a regulatory role while multinational private firms came to occupy service provider roles that had traditionally been in the public sector. In this dissertation, I compare this process in Chile and Argentina, focusing on the Santiago Metropolitan Region and Greater Buenos Aires since the late 1980s to the present. I show that in Chile, state-run water utilities achieved relatively high performance with respect to extending access to running water and sewerage connections before full-scale privatization went forward. The fact that they were high performing made them not only more attractive to private investors but also more likely to be interpreted as proof of privatization success later on. By contrast, in Argentina, where connections to running water and sewerage services were low and the waterworks system faced many problems, especially in the informal settlements and marginalized communities of Greater Buenos Aires, the experiment failed and private companies could not step in to fill gaps created by weak state capacity despite the expectations set up by the narrative of pro-market supporters. Still, the years of failed privatization inadvertently led the government to eventually pay attention to water and sanitation again, pouring funding into new public works alongside the creation of a new public sector company.
    [Show full text]
  • 2007 Document De Re Fe Rence
    DOCUMENT DE RE FE RENCE 2007 INCORPORATION PAR RE FE RENCE : Conformément à l’article 28 du règlement européen n° 809/2004 du 29 avril 2004, le présent Document de Référence incorpore par référence les informations suivantes auxquelles le lecteur est invité à se reporter : 1Relativement à l’exercice clos le 31 décembre 2006 : rapport d’activité, comptes consolidés et rapports des commissaires aux comptes y afférents, figurant dans le Document de Référence déposé le 4 avril 2007 auprès de l’Autorité des Marchés Financiers respectivement aux pages 117 à 130 , 196 à 307, 308 et 309 . 1Relativement à l’exercice clos le 31 décembre 2005 : rapport d’activité, comptes consolidés et rapports des commissaires aux comptes y afférents, figurant dans le Document de Référence déposé le 11 avril 2006 auprès de l’Autorité des Marchés Financiers respectivement aux pages 89 à 101, 154 à 280 et 281 à 282. Les informations incluses dans ces deux Documents de Référence, autres que celles visées ci-dessus, sont, le cas échéant, remplacées ou mises à jour par les informations incluses dans le présent Document de Référence. Ces deux Documents de Référence sont accessibles dans les conditions décrites à la Section 24 «Documents accessibles au public» du présent Document de Référence. Le présent Document de Référence contient des indications prospectives, notamment à la Section 6.1 «Principales activités», à la Section 12 «Informations sur les tendances» et au paragraphe «Perspectives 2008» du rapport d’activité (Section 9.7). Ces indications ne sont pas des données historiques et ne doivent pas être interprétées comme une garantie que les faits et données énoncés se produiront ou que les objectifs seront atteints, ceux-ci étant par nature soumis à des facteurs externes, tels que présentés dans la Section 4 «Facteurs de risque».
    [Show full text]
  • London and Europe: Facts and Figures. Current Issues Note 51
    Current Issues Note 51 London and Europe: Facts and figures Emma Christie and Gordon Douglass February 2017 London and Europe: Facts and figures Current Issues Note 51 copyright Greater London Authority February 2017 Published by Greater London Authority City Hall The Queens Walk London SE1 2AA www.london.gov.uk Tel 020 7983 4922 Minicom 020 7983 4000 ISBN 978-1-84781-647-4 Cover photograph © EU audiovisual services For more information about this publication, please contact: GLA Economics Tel 020 7983 4922 Email [email protected] GLA Economics provides expert advice and analysis on London’s economy and the economic issues facing the capital. Data and analysis from GLA Economics form a basis for the policy and investment decisions facing the Mayor of London and the GLA group. GLA Economics uses a wide range of information and data sourced from third party suppliers within its analysis and reports. GLA Economics cannot be held responsible for the accuracy or timeliness of this information and data. The GLA will not be liable for any losses suffered or liabilities incurred by a party as a result of that party relying in any way on the information contained in this report. London and Europe: Facts and figures Current Issues Note 51 Contents Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 2 Background and context ............................................................................................................. 3 London’s economy
    [Show full text]