2003 Vol.38 13.Pdf
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Is Ellipura Monophyletic? a Combined Analysis of Basal Hexapod
ARTICLE IN PRESS Organisms, Diversity & Evolution 4 (2004) 319–340 www.elsevier.de/ode Is Ellipura monophyletic? A combined analysis of basal hexapod relationships with emphasis on the origin of insects Gonzalo Giribeta,Ã, Gregory D.Edgecombe b, James M.Carpenter c, Cyrille A.D’Haese d, Ward C.Wheeler c aDepartment of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Museum of Comparative Zoology, Harvard University, 16 Divinity Avenue, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA bAustralian Museum, 6 College Street, Sydney, New South Wales 2010, Australia cDivision of Invertebrate Zoology, American Museum of Natural History, Central Park West at 79th Street, New York, NY 10024, USA dFRE 2695 CNRS, De´partement Syste´matique et Evolution, Muse´um National d’Histoire Naturelle, 45 rue Buffon, F-75005 Paris, France Received 27 February 2004; accepted 18 May 2004 Abstract Hexapoda includes 33 commonly recognized orders, most of them insects.Ongoing controversy concerns the grouping of Protura and Collembola as a taxon Ellipura, the monophyly of Diplura, a single or multiple origins of entognathy, and the monophyly or paraphyly of the silverfish (Lepidotrichidae and Zygentoma s.s.) with respect to other dicondylous insects.Here we analyze relationships among basal hexapod orders via a cladistic analysis of sequence data for five molecular markers and 189 morphological characters in a simultaneous analysis framework using myriapod and crustacean outgroups.Using a sensitivity analysis approach and testing for stability, the most congruent parameters resolve Tricholepidion as sister group to the remaining Dicondylia, whereas most suboptimal parameter sets group Tricholepidion with Zygentoma.Stable hypotheses include the monophyly of Diplura, and a sister group relationship between Diplura and Protura, contradicting the Ellipura hypothesis.Hexapod monophyly is contradicted by an alliance between Collembola, Crustacea and Ectognatha (i.e., exclusive of Diplura and Protura) in molecular and combined analyses. -
Formation of the Entognathy of Dicellurata, Occasjapyx Japonicus (Enderlein, 1907) (Hexapoda: Diplura, Dicellurata)
S O I L O R G A N I S M S Volume 83 (3) 2011 pp. 399–404 ISSN: 1864-6417 Formation of the entognathy of Dicellurata, Occasjapyx japonicus (Enderlein, 1907) (Hexapoda: Diplura, Dicellurata) Kaoru Sekiya1, 2 and Ryuichiro Machida1 1 Sugadaira Montane Research Center, University of Tsukuba, Sugadaira Kogen, Ueda, Nagano 386-2204, Japan 2 Corresponding author: Kaoru Sekiya (e-mail: [email protected]) Abstract The development of the entognathy in Dicellurata was examined using Occasjapyx japonicus (Enderlein, 1907). The formation of entognathy involves rotation of the labial appendages, resulting in a tandem arrangement of the glossa, paraglossa and labial palp. The mandibular, maxillary and labial terga extend ventrally to form the mouth fold. The intercalary tergum also participates in the formation of the mouth fold. The labial coxae extending anteriorly unite with the labial terga, constituting the posterior region of the mouth fold, the medial half of which is later partitioned into the admentum. The labial appendages of both sides migrate medially, and the labial subcoxae fuse to form the postmentum, which posteriorly confines the entognathy. The entognathy formation in Dicellurata is common to that in another dipluran suborder, Rhabdura. The entognathy of Diplura greatly differs from that of Protura and Collembola in the developmental plan, preventing homologization of the entognathies of Diplura and other two entognathan orders. Keywords: Entognatha, comparative embryology, mouth fold, admentum, postmentum 1. Introduction The Diplura, a basal clade of the Hexapoda, have traditionally been placed within Entognatha [= Diplura + Collembola + Protura], a group characterized by entognathy (Hennig 1969). However, Hennig’s ‘Entognatha-Ectognatha System’, especially the validity of Entognatha, has been challenged by various disciplines. -
Systematic and Biogeographical Study of Protura (Hexapoda) in Russian Far East: New Data on High Endemism of the Group
A peer-reviewed open-access journal ZooKeys 424:Systematic 19–57 (2014) and biogeographical study of Protura (Hexapoda) in Russian Far East... 19 doi: 10.3897/zookeys.424.7388 RESEARCH ARTICLE www.zookeys.org Launched to accelerate biodiversity research Systematic and biogeographical study of Protura (Hexapoda) in Russian Far East: new data on high endemism of the group Yun Bu1, Mikhail B. Potapov2, Wen Ying Yin1 1 Institute of Plant Physiology and Ecology, Shanghai Institutes for Biological Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, 200032 China 2 Moscow State Pedagogical University, Kibalchich str., 6, korp. 5, Moscow, 129278 Russia Corresponding author: Yun Bu ([email protected]) Academic editor: L. Deharveng | Received 4 March 2014 | Accepted 4 June 2014 | Published 8 July 2014 http://zoobank.org/38EAC4B7-8834-4054-B9AC-9747AC476543 Citation: Bu Y, Potapov MB, Yin WY (2014) Systematic and biogeographical study of Protura (Hexapoda) in Russian Far East: new data on high endemism of the group. ZooKeys 424: 19–57. doi: 10.3897/zookeys.424.7388 Abstract Proturan collections from Magadan Oblast, Khabarovsk Krai, Primorsky Krai, and Sakhalin Oblast are re- ported here. Twenty-five species are found of which 13 species are new records for Russian Far East which enrich the knowledge of Protura known for this area. Three new species Baculentulus krabbensis sp. n., Fjellbergella lazovskiensis sp. n. and Yichunentulus alpatovi sp. n. are illustrated and described. The new materials of Imadateiella sharovi (Martynova, 1977) are studied and described in details. Two new combi- nations, Yichunentulus borealis (Nakamura, 2004), comb. n. and Fjellbergella jilinensis (Wu & Yin, 2007), comb. -
Atti Accademia Nazionale Italiana Di Entomologia Anno LIX, 2011: 9-27
ATTI DELLA ACCADEMIA NAZIONALE ITALIANA DI ENTOMOLOGIA RENDICONTI Anno LIX 2011 TIPOGRAFIA COPPINI - FIRENZE ISSN 0065-0757 Direttore Responsabile: Prof. Romano Dallai Presidente Accademia Nazionale Italiana di Entomologia Coordinatore della Redazione: Dr. Roberto Nannelli La responsabilità dei lavori pubblicati è esclusivamente degli autori Registrazione al Tribunale di Firenze n. 5422 del 24 maggio 2005 INDICE Rendiconti Consiglio di Presidenza . Pag. 5 Elenco degli Accademici . »6 Verbali delle adunanze del 18-19 febbraio 2011 . »9 Verbali delle adunanze del 13 giugno 2011 . »15 Verbali delle adunanze del 18-19 novembre 2011 . »20 Commemorazioni GIUSEPPE OSELLA – Sandro Ruffo: uomo e scienziato. Ricordi di un collaboratore . »29 FRANCESCO PENNACCHIO – Ermenegildo Tremblay . »35 STEFANO MAINI – Giorgio Celli (1935-2011) . »51 Tavola rotonda su: L’ENTOMOLOGIA MERCEOLOGICA PER LA PREVENZIONE E LA LOTTA CONTRO GLI INFESTANTI NELLE INDUSTRIE ALIMENTARI VACLAV STEJSKAL – The role of urban entomology to ensure food safety and security . »69 PIERO CRAVEDI, LUCIANO SÜSS – Sviluppo delle conoscenze in Italia sugli organismi infestanti in post- raccolta: passato, presente, futuro . »75 PASQUALE TREMATERRA – Riflessioni sui feromoni degli insetti infestanti le derrate alimentari . »83 AGATINO RUSSO – Limiti e prospettive delle applicazioni di lotta biologica in post-raccolta . »91 GIACINTO SALVATORE GERMINARA, ANTONIO DE CRISTOFARO, GIUSEPPE ROTUNDO – Attività biologica di composti volatili dei cereali verso Sitophilus spp. » 101 MICHELE MAROLI – La contaminazione entomatica nella filiera degli alimenti di origine vegetale: con- trollo igienico sanitario e limiti di tolleranza . » 107 Giornata culturale su: EVOLUZIONE ED ADATTAMENTI DEGLI ARTROPODI CONTRIBUTI DI BASE ALLA CONOSCENZA DEGLI INSETTI ANTONIO CARAPELLI, FRANCESCO NARDI, ROMANO DALLAI, FRANCESCO FRATI – La filogenesi degli esa- podi basali, aspetti controversi e recenti acquisizioni . -
Protura: Acerentomidae Sl
Eur. J. Entorno?. 98: 249-255, 2001 ISSN 1210-5759 Vindobonella leopoldina gen. n., sp. n. from Austria (Protura: Acerentomidae s. 1.) An drzej SZEPTYCKI1 and E rhard CHRISTIAN2 1 Institute of Systematics and Evolution ofAnimals ofthe Polish Academy of Sciences, ul. Slawkowska 17,31016 Kraków, Poland; e-mail: [email protected] 2 Institute ofZoology, University ofAgricultural Sciences, Gregor-Mendel-StraBe 33, A-1180 Wien, Austria; e-mail: [email protected] Key words. Protura, Acerentomidae, new genus, new species, taxonomy, Central Europe Abstract. A new genus, Vindobonella gen. n. (Acerentomidae s. l.), and a new species, Vindobonella leopoldina sp. n., are described from Vienna. The new genus belongs to a group characterized by a reduced labial palp and a non-modified striate band on abdominal segment VIII. INTRODUCTION microchaeta (cf. Bernard, 1990). Poresl present on meso- An investigation of the soil fauna of the city of Viennaand metanotum, al on mesonotum only. Prosternum with seta A2. revealed two new proturan species of the family Eosento- midae (Szeptycki & Christian, 2000). The new aceren- Foretarsal sensillumb' present, tl claviform,t2 thick tomid species described in the present paper is placed in a and pointed (not filiform and thin as in most Acerentomi dae), t3 cylindrical. Sensillum d inserted proximad to new genus: level of insertion oft2, much nearer toc than to e. Vindobonella gen. n. Seta P3 on abdominal terga II-VI anterior to line Type species: Vindobonella leopoldina sp. n., by P2-P4. Seta P2a on urotergite I is a gemmate original designation. microchaeta,A5 on urotergite I and all accessory setae on abdominal segments II-VII are thin, linear microchaetae. -
Aquatic Insects
AQUATIC INSECTS Challenges to Populations This page intentionally left blank AQUATIC INSECTS Challenges to Populations Proceedings of the Royal Entomological Society’s 24th Symposium Edited by Jill Lancaster Institute of Evolutionary Biology University of Edinburgh Edinburgh, UK and Robert A. Briers School of Life Sciences Napier University Edinburgh, UK CABI is a trading name of CAB International CABI Head Offi ce CABI North American Offi ce Nosworthy Way 875 Massachusetts Avenue Wallingford 7th Floor Oxfordshire OX10 8DE Cambridge, MA 02139 UK USA Tel: +44 (0)1491 832111 Tel: +1 617 395 4056 Fax: +44 (0)1491 833508 Fax: +1 617 354 6875 E-mail: [email protected] E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.cabi.org CAB International 2008. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced in any form or by any means, electronically, mechanically, by photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior permission of the copyright owners. A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library, London, UK. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Royal Entomological Society of London. Symposium (24th : 2007 : University of Edinburgh) Aquatic insects : challenges to populations : proceedings of the Royal Entomological Society’s 24th symposium / edited by Jill Lancaster, Rob A. Briers. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-1-84593-396-8 (alk. paper) 1. Aquatic insects--Congresses. I. Lancaster, Jill. II. Briers, Rob A. III. Title. QL472.R69 2007 595.7176--dc22 2008000626 ISBN: 978 1 84593 396 8 Typeset by AMA Dataset, Preston, UK Printed and bound in the UK by Cromwell Press, Trowbridge The paper used for the text pages in this book is FSC certifi ed. -
Zootaxa, Two New Species of the Genus Baculentulus from The
Zootaxa 2619: 39–48 (2010) ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ Article ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2010 · Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) Two new species of the genus Baculentulus from the Russian Far East (Protura: Acerentomidae, Berberentulinae) JULIA SHRUBOVYCH1,2 1Institute of Systematics and Evolution of Animals, Polish Academy of Sciences, ul. Sławkowska 17, 31-016 Kraków, Poland. E-mail: [email protected] 2State Museum of Natural History, Ukrainian National Academy of Sciences, Teatral’na St. 18, UA 79008 L’viv, Ukraine. E-mail: [email protected] Abstract Baculentulus pomorskii sp. nov. and B. potapovi sp. nov. are described from the Russian Far East. Baculentulus pomorskii sp. nov. is characterized by presence of an additional seta on the head and seta P1a on tergites I–VII, very long foretarsal sensillum a, sensillum b shorter than c and d, long sensillum e and slender sensillum a’. Berberentulus potapovi sp. nov. is characterized by absence of any additional setae on the head, presence of seta P1a on tergites I–VII, number of A-setae on the tergites, and a unique seta-complex on male squama genitalis. Key words: Protura, chaetotaxy, porotaxy, Russia, Far East Introduction The genus Baculentulus Tuxen, 1977 contains 36 species distributed throughout the world (Szeptycki 2007; Wu & Yin 2008; Nakamura & Linkhitrakarn 2009). However, only 2 species have hitherto been reported from the Russian Far East: B. borealis Nakamura, 2004 and B. loxoglenus Yin, 1980 (Nakamura 2004). The present paper contains the description of two new species from this area. Baculentulus pomorskii sp. nov. Figs. -
Protura: Acerentomidae)
Zootaxa 3755 (2): 136–164 ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ Article ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2014 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3755.2.2 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:2BA7877A-8CDF-4658-A789-F18EE565422B Identification and character analysis of the Acerentomidae (Protura) of the northeastern Palearctic (Protura: Acerentomidae) JULIA SHRUBOVYCH Institute of Systematics and Evolution of Animals, Polish Academy of Sciences, ul. Sławkowska 17, 31-016 Kraków, Poland and State Museum of Natural History, Ukrainian National Academy of Sciences, Teatral’na St. 18, UA 79008 L’viv, Ukraine. E-mail: [email protected] Abstract This paper is a summary of proturan fauna from Siberia and the Russian Far East, collectively termed the northeastern Palearctic. Special attention is given to the analysis of Acerentomidae, which is extraordinarily diverse in these regions (31 species). A key to species and a brief exposition of distribution of each genus are provided. A redescription of Im- adateiella sharovi is presented, additional morphological characters are added for Nipponentomon khabarovskense, N. bi- dentatum, Yamatentomon yamato and Callientomon chinensis, and additional collection data are given for Y. yamato, C. chinensis, Nipponentomon jaceki and N. nippon. A cladistic analysis is presented of hypothetical relationships among the discussed acerentomid taxa. A scheme for ventral porotaxy is proposed, and the taxonomic importance of porotaxic char- acters within Acerentomata is discussed. Some biogeographical and phylogenetic considerations are given. Key words: taxonomy, cladistic analysis, porotaxy, key, redescription, new records Introduction Protura inhabit soils worldwide, excepting the Arctic and Antarctic regions (Pass & Szucsich 2011). -
Orden Protura (Acerentomata Y Eosentomata)
Revista IDE@ - SEA, nº 37 (30-06-2015): 1–7. ISSN 2386-7183 1 Ibero Diversidad Entomológica @ccesible www.sea-entomologia.org/IDE@ Clase: Entognatha Orden PROTURA Manual CLASE ENTOGNATHA Orden Protura (Acerentomata y Eosentomata) Antonio Melic Sociedad Entomológica Aragonesa (S.E.A.) Avda. Francisca Millán Serrano, 37 50012 Zaragoza (España) [email protected] 1. Breve definición del grupo y principales caracteres diagnósticos Hexapoda incluye cuatro grandes grupos de organismos: Protura, Collembola, Diplura e Insecta (s.s.). Los tres primeros grupos conforman, junto a Microcoryphia y Zygentoma, los denominados Apterygota, insectos primitivamente ápteros. Sin embargo tal agrupación resulta artificial (Bach et al., 1999) y debe desestimarse. Tradicionalmente los Protura se han incluido junto a Collembola y Diplura en los Entognatha, por oposición a los Ectognatha o insectos en sentido estricto. A su vez, Protura y Collembola se han agrupado bajo el nombre de Ellipura. Aunque la posición filogenética de los tres órdenes de Entognatha con respec- to a los Ectognatha ha sido muy discutida, con autores apoyando prácticamente todas las alternativas posibles, los datos genéticos más recientes indican que Ellipura es monofilético y hermano de los Diplura más los Ectognatha (los Cercophora) (Misof et al., 2014). Está relación está también soportada por algu- nos caracteres morfológicos importantes, como la presencia en Cercophora de cercos abdominales (de ahí su nombre), uñas pares, una estructura común del axonema de los espermatozoides y la formación de una segunda membrana en el embrión (el amnion). La monofilia de los Ellipura está soportada por una misma estructura de las mandíbulas (diferente a las de Diplura), la ausencia de espiráculos abdominales, y probablemente la presencia de órganos de Tömösvary. -
Molecular Phylogenetic Analyses Support the Monophyly of Hexapoda and Suggest the Paraphyly of Entognatha Sasaki Et Al
Molecular phylogenetic analyses support the monophyly of Hexapoda and suggest the paraphyly of Entognatha Sasaki et al. Sasaki et al. BMC Evolutionary Biology 2013, 13:236 http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2148/13/236 Sasaki et al. BMC Evolutionary Biology 2013, 13:236 http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2148/13/236 RESEARCH ARTICLE Open Access Molecular phylogenetic analyses support the monophyly of Hexapoda and suggest the paraphyly of Entognatha Go Sasaki1,4, Keisuke Ishiwata1,2,5, Ryuichiro Machida3, Takashi Miyata1 and Zhi-Hui Su1,2* Abstract Background: Molecular phylogenetic analyses have revealed that Hexapoda and Crustacea form a common clade (the Pancrustacea), which is now widely accepted among zoologists; however, the origin of Hexapoda remains unresolved. The main problems are the unclear relationships among the basal hexapod lineages, Protura (proturans), Collembola (springtails), Diplura (diplurans), and Ectognatha (bristletails, silverfishes, and all winged insects). Mitogenomic analyses have challenged hexapod monophyly and suggested the reciprocal paraphyly of Hexapoda and Crustacea, whereas studies based on nuclear molecular data support the monophyletic origin of hexapods. Additionally, there are significant discrepancies with respect to these issues between the results of morphological and molecular studies. To investigate these problems, we performed phylogenetic analyses of Pancrustacea based on the protein sequences of three orthologous nuclear genes encoding the catalytic subunit of DNA polymerase delta and the largest and second largest subunits of RNA polymerase II from 64 species of arthropods, including representatives of all hexapod orders. Results: Phylogenetic analyses were conducted based on the inferred amino acid (aa) sequences (~3400 aa in total) of the three genes using the maximum likelihood (ML) method and Bayesian inference. -
100 Years of Research on the Protura: Many Secrets Still Retained
S O I L O R G A N I S M S Volume 83 (3) 2011 pp. 309–334 ISSN: 1864-6417 100 years of research on the Protura: many secrets still retained Günther Pass1, 3 and Nikolaus Urban Szucsich1,2 1 Department of Evolutionary Biology, University of Vienna, Althanstraße 14, A-1090, Vienna, Austria 2 Department of Entomology, Biocenter Grindel and Zoological Museum, University of Hamburg, Martin-Luther-King-Platz 3, D-20146, Hamburg, Germany 3 Corresponding author: Günther Pass (e-mail: [email protected]) Abstract The Protura were discovered relatively late in the history of entomology. The first description of these minute soil arthropods was given in 1907 by the Italian entomologist Filippo Silvestri, who named them ‘Protura’. Shortly thereafter his fellow countryman Antonio Berlese published two brief notes on these animals before his grand monograph of the ‘Myrientomata’, as he named them, appeared in 1909. The centennial of the discovery of Protura offers the opportunity to review our knowledge about these peculiar animals. In the end, we must confess that proturans continue to retain an amazing number of secrets, including basic facts of knowledge about their biology and ecology. Up to the present, they have concealed from scientific observation their sexual life and the mode of sperm transmission. For a long time, their egg deposition and early development were completely obscure topics; only recently has it become possible to conduct first observations on their embryology. The list of open questions can be easily extended: we know only little about their nutritional biology, and next to nothing about their sensory systems, communication, physiological and ecological capacities. -
Molecular Phylogenetic Analyses Support the Monophyly of Hexapoda and Suggest the Paraphyly of Entognatha Sasaki Et Al
Molecular phylogenetic analyses support the monophyly of Hexapoda and suggest the paraphyly of Entognatha Sasaki et al. Sasaki et al. BMC Evolutionary Biology 2013, 13:236 http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2148/13/236 Sasaki et al. BMC Evolutionary Biology 2013, 13:236 http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2148/13/236 RESEARCH ARTICLE Open Access Molecular phylogenetic analyses support the monophyly of Hexapoda and suggest the paraphyly of Entognatha Go Sasaki1,4, Keisuke Ishiwata1,2,5, Ryuichiro Machida3, Takashi Miyata1 and Zhi-Hui Su1,2* Abstract Background: Molecular phylogenetic analyses have revealed that Hexapoda and Crustacea form a common clade (the Pancrustacea), which is now widely accepted among zoologists; however, the origin of Hexapoda remains unresolved. The main problems are the unclear relationships among the basal hexapod lineages, Protura (proturans), Collembola (springtails), Diplura (diplurans), and Ectognatha (bristletails, silverfishes, and all winged insects). Mitogenomic analyses have challenged hexapod monophyly and suggested the reciprocal paraphyly of Hexapoda and Crustacea, whereas studies based on nuclear molecular data support the monophyletic origin of hexapods. Additionally, there are significant discrepancies with respect to these issues between the results of morphological and molecular studies. To investigate these problems, we performed phylogenetic analyses of Pancrustacea based on the protein sequences of three orthologous nuclear genes encoding the catalytic subunit of DNA polymerase delta and the largest and second largest subunits of RNA polymerase II from 64 species of arthropods, including representatives of all hexapod orders. Results: Phylogenetic analyses were conducted based on the inferred amino acid (aa) sequences (~3400 aa in total) of the three genes using the maximum likelihood (ML) method and Bayesian inference.