DOCSLIB.ORG

Ancient and Modern Views on the Role of Early Writing Systems

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Ancient and Modern Views on the Role of Early Writing Systems Mary Bywater The Impact of Writing: Ancient and Modern Views on the Role of Early Writing Systems Within Society and as a Part of ‘Civilisation’ Mary Elizabeth Bywater UCL Submitted for the degree: Master of Philosophy (Mphil) 1 Mary Bywater I, Mary Bywater, confirm that the work presented in this thesis is my own. Where information has been derived from other sources, I confirm that this has been indicated in the thesis 2 Mary Bywater Abstract Writing is essential to the way in which we live today, our society would simply not exist without it. Because of this there is often a danger of unconsciously projecting the importance we put on writing onto ancient societies. The aim of my research project is to uncover the way in which the invention of writing was received and originally affected the people living in the regions where it was being used, and how this view fits in with the modern interpretations that have been put forward on the impact of writing and literacy. In my study I will be using Egypt and Sumer as case studies, as they were the first regions to invent writing. This is important as it means their societies had not been exposed to writing beforehand, so their reaction was not affected by a preconceived idea of the function of writing. I will begin by looking at the modern views on the role of writing, espoused by scholars from the 18th, 19th and 20th centuries. These modern views often link writing to the idea of ‘civilisation’, believing that without it a society cannot be called civilised. The modern views will be contrasted with the ancient views of early writing, both from the perspective of society as a whole, and on a more personal level. By doing so I hope to highlight where modern views of early writing diverge significantly from ancient views, allowing us to reconsider arguments and place them within their proper context. 3 Mary Bywater Contents Introduction ………………………………………………………………………………………6 Section A: The Modern Perspectives of Early Writing …………………………………….16 Chapter 1 - Writing as Civilization ……………………………………………………………………....16 Modern Interpretations of the Origins of Writing ………………………………………………...16 Writing as Divine Gift ………………………………………………………………………16 Writing as Civilisation ………………………………………………………………………19 Lévi-Strauss and Slavery …………………………………………………………......24 Effect of Literacy on Thought Processes …………………………………………………………31 Conclusion ………………………………………………………………………………………..38 Chapter 2 - Investigating the Birth of Writing: a Story of Competition …………………………………41 The Decipherment of Cuneiform and Hieroglyphs ………………………………………………41 Religion and Philosophy as Motivation for Decipherment …………………………………42 Neoplatonism and the Egyptian Writing System ……………………………………….42 The Bible and the Mesopotamian Writing System ………………………………...…...43 Prestige as Motivation for Decipherment …………………………………………………...47 Rivalry Between Nations: Britain and France …………………………………………..47 Competing Individuals: The Heroic Scholar ……………………………………………52 Conclusion …………………………………………………………………………………..62 The Debate about the “Birthplace of Writing” …………………………………………………...64 The Candidates ………………………………………………………………………64 Southern Mesopotamia: Uruk …………………………………………………………...64 Egypt: Abydos …………………………………………………………………………..66 The Role of Radiocarbon Dating in the Debate …………………………………………….70 Conclusion ………………………………………………………………………………………..73 Section B: Views from Within Egypt and Mesopotamia …………………………………..75 Chapter 3 - Divine Patrons of Writing: The Gods as Ideal Scribes ……………………………………...76 The goddess Nisaba ………………………………………………………………………………77 The god Nabu ……………………………………………………………………………………..82 The goddess Seschat ……………………………………………………………………………...87 The god Thoth …………………………………………………………………………………….92 The god Enki ……………………………………………………………………………………...96 Conclusions ……………………………………………………………………………………….99 Chapter 4 - Literary Compositions as Sources for Ancient Views on Writing ………………………...102 Views on the Origins of Writing ………………………………………………………………..103 Enki and Inanna (Mesopotamia) …………………………………………………………..103 Enmerkar and the lord of Aratta (Mesopotamia) ………………………………………….104 The Babyloniaca of Berossos (Mesopotamia) ……………………………………………..106 4 Mary Bywater Views on the Power of the Written Word ……………………………………………………….108 Setne Khamwas and Naneferkaptah (Egypt) ……………………………………….....109 Enmerkar and the lord of Aratta (Mesopotamia) ………………………………………….111 The Sumerian Sargon Legend (Mesopotamia) …………………………………………….112 Views on the Role of the Scribe ………………………………………………………………...114 Satire of the Trades (Egypt) ……………………………………………………………….114 Papyrus Lansing (Egypt) …………………………………………………………………..119 Papyrus Chester Beatty IV (Egypt) ……………………………………………………………….120 Schooldays (Mesopotamia) ………………………………………………………………..122 Dialogues (Mesopotamia) …………………………………………………………………124 The Epic of Gilgamesh (Mesopotamia) ……………………………………………………127 Enki and the World Order (Mesopotamia) ………………………………………………...130 Conclusions ……………………………………………………………………………………...131 Chapter 5 - Writing as a Recording System, Writing as a Creative Tool ……………………………....135 Writing as a Recording System …………………………………………………………………135 Seals and Sealings …………………………………………………………………………136 Pottery Marks ……………………………………………………………………………...141 Tokens and Bullae …………………………………………………………………………146 Conclusions ………………………………………………………………………………..148 Writing as a Creative Tool ………………………………………………………………………151 Conclusions ……………………………………………………………………………………...168 Section C: Encounters with Writing ………………………………………………………..173 Chapter 6 - Practitioners of Writing, Levels of Literacy ……………………………………………….174 Literacy as a Status Marker ……………………………………………………………………..175 Levels of Literacy ……………………………………………………………………………….181 Functional Literacy ………………………………………………………………………...182 Scholarly Literacy …………………………………………………………………………189 Technical Literacy …………………………………………………………………………192 Conclusions ……………………………………………………………………………………...194 Chapter 7 - Exposed to Writing: Non-literate Experiences …………………………………………….198 Temple: Encounters with the Divine ……………………………………………………………199 Egypt ………………………………………………………………………………………199 Mesopotamia ………………………………………………………………………………203 Palace: Encounters with the State ……………………………………………………………….206 Conclusions ……………………………………………………………………………………...208 Conclusions …………………………………………………………………………………….210 List of Figures ………………………………………………………………………………….217 Bibliography ……………………………………………………………………………………219 5 Mary Bywater Introduction Overview Writing is integral to the way in which our society functions. There is virtually no area or social group that does not use writing in some way. Because of this total immersion in writing we make certain judgements and assumptions about it. This means that there is a danger of unconsciously projecting our idea of writing onto ancient societies where it may not be valid. The aim of my research project is to examine the way in which early writing systems in Egypt and Mesopotamia were understood by the people who first used them, and how this view fits in with the modern interpretations that have been put forward on the impact of writing. If these views diverge significantly then we must reconsider the way in which we study early writing in order to be able to truly understand it. One of the ways in which modern views of writing are manifested is through the belief that the beginning of writing was also the beginning of ‘civilisation’, which we usually associate with formalised governance, law, art and monumental architecture. However there is evidence that many, if not all, of these things had been achieved long before the invention of writing. In fact it took several hundred years after the invention of writing before its use spread away from purely administrative and ideological arenas and expanded into areas such as literature and letter writing. Therefore we cannot assume that this connection was made by ancient societies. The field has also been dominated by the long running debate between Egyptologists and ancient Near Eastern scholars over which region saw the invention of writing first. However, because of the nature of archaeology we do not have evidence for the earliest ever writing and we are unlikely ever to find it, so this debate over primacy will almost certainly remain unresolved. The issue is further complicated by the fact that the dating of the evidence we do have from each region is so close that any perceived differences are not actually that meaningful. But, as my research will highlight, even if it were to be proven which region 6 Mary Bywater began writing first, it would be of little significance to the study of writing or either culture. Key questions would still abound about early writing and how or if it has shaped society. I would argue that it is time to put aside this debate and refocus our efforts on other aspects of early writing. In my study I use Egypt and Mesopotamia as case studies as they were the first regions to invent writing. This is important as it means their societies had not been exposed to writing beforehand, so their reaction was not affected by preconceived ideas of the function of writing. This should enable us to assess the impact of writing on these societies. It is important to study both Egypt and Mesopotamia because the different scripts used in each region give a variety of perspectives of writing. ‘Writing’ in Egypt and Mesopotamia was not one universal concept but a whole range of different scripts, each of which worked and were used in their own unique ways. Even where a script crosses cultural boundaries we cannot
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Egyptian Islamic and Secular Feminists in Their Own Context Assim Alkhawaja University of San Francisco, [email protected]
    The University of San Francisco USF Scholarship: a digital repository @ Gleeson Library | Geschke Center Doctoral Dissertations Theses, Dissertations, Capstones and Projects 2015 Complexity of Women's Liberation in the Era of Westernization: Egyptian Islamic and Secular Feminists in Their Own Context Assim Alkhawaja University of San Francisco, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.usfca.edu/diss Part of the Feminist, Gender, and Sexuality Studies Commons, and the Near and Middle Eastern Studies Commons Recommended Citation Alkhawaja, Assim, "Complexity of Women's Liberation in the Era of Westernization: Egyptian Islamic and Secular Feminists in Their Own Context" (2015). Doctoral Dissertations. 287. https://repository.usfca.edu/diss/287 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses, Dissertations, Capstones and Projects at USF Scholarship: a digital repository @ Gleeson Library | Geschke Center. It has been accepted for inclusion in Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized administrator of USF Scholarship: a digital repository @ Gleeson Library | Geschke Center. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The University of San Francisco COMPLEXITY OF WOMEN‘S LIBERATION IN THE ERA OF WESTERNIZATION: EGYPTIAN ISLAMIC AND SECULAR FEMINISTS IN THEIR OWN CONTEXT A Dissertation Presented to The Faculty of the School of Education International & Multicultural Education Department In Partial Fulfillment Of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Education By Assim Alkhawaja San Francisco May 2015 THE UNIVERSITY OF SAN FRANCISCO Dissertation Abstract Complexity Of Women‘s Liberation in the Era of Westernization: Egyptian Islamic And Secular Feminists In Their Own Context Informed by postcolonial/Islamic feminist theory, this qualitative study explores how Egyptian feminists navigate the political and social influence of the West.
    [Show full text]
  • Jssea 42 (2015-2016) 71
    Demotic and Hieratic Scholia in Funerary Papyri and their Implications for the Manufacturing Process1 Foy Scalf Abstract: Many ancient Egyptian papyrus manuscripts inscribed with funerary compositions contain annotations within the text and margins. Some of these annotations relate directly to the production process for illustrating and inscribing the manuscripts by providing instructions for scribes and artists. Two overlooked examples, pKhaemhor (MMA 25.3.212) and pRyerson (OIM E9787), allow for new interpretations of parallel texts previously considered as labels or captions. An analysis of the corpus of scholia and marginalia demonstrates specific manufacturing proclivities for selective groups of texts, while simultaneously revealing a wide variety of possible construction sequences and techniques in others. Résumé: Plusieurs manuscrits anciens de papyrus égyptiens sur lesquels sont inscrites des compositions funéraires contiennent des annotations dans le texte et dans les marges. Certaines de ces annotations sont directement liées au processus de production relatif à l’illustration et à l’inscription des manuscrits en donnant des instructions destinées aux scribes et aux artistes. Deux exemples négligés, le pKhaemhor (MMA 25.3.212) et le pRyerson (OIM E9787), permettent de nouvelles interprétations de textes parallèles précédemment considérés comme des étiquettes ou des légendes. Une analyse du corpus des scholia et marginalia démontre des tendances de fabrication spécifiques pour des groupes particuliers de textes, tout en révélant simultanément une grande variété de séquences et de techniques de construction dans d'autres cas. Keywords: Book of the Dead – Funerary Papyri – Scholia – Marginalia – Hieratic – Demotic Mots-clés: Livre des Morts – Papyrus funéraire – Scholia – Marginalia – hiératique – démotique The production of illustrated funerary papyri in ancient Egypt was a complex and expensive process that often involved the efforts of a team of skilled scribes and artisans.
    [Show full text]
  • Cuneiform and Hieroglyphs 11
    The Unicode® Standard Version 13.0 – Core Specification To learn about the latest version of the Unicode Standard, see http://www.unicode.org/versions/latest/. Many of the designations used by manufacturers and sellers to distinguish their products are claimed as trademarks. Where those designations appear in this book, and the publisher was aware of a trade- mark claim, the designations have been printed with initial capital letters or in all capitals. Unicode and the Unicode Logo are registered trademarks of Unicode, Inc., in the United States and other countries. The authors and publisher have taken care in the preparation of this specification, but make no expressed or implied warranty of any kind and assume no responsibility for errors or omissions. No liability is assumed for incidental or consequential damages in connection with or arising out of the use of the information or programs contained herein. The Unicode Character Database and other files are provided as-is by Unicode, Inc. No claims are made as to fitness for any particular purpose. No warranties of any kind are expressed or implied. The recipient agrees to determine applicability of information provided. © 2020 Unicode, Inc. All rights reserved. This publication is protected by copyright, and permission must be obtained from the publisher prior to any prohibited reproduction. For information regarding permissions, inquire at http://www.unicode.org/reporting.html. For information about the Unicode terms of use, please see http://www.unicode.org/copyright.html. The Unicode Standard / the Unicode Consortium; edited by the Unicode Consortium. — Version 13.0. Includes index. ISBN 978-1-936213-26-9 (http://www.unicode.org/versions/Unicode13.0.0/) 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Bibliography
    Bibliography Many books were read and researched in the compilation of Binford, L. R, 1983, Working at Archaeology. Academic Press, The Encyclopedic Dictionary of Archaeology: New York. Binford, L. R, and Binford, S. R (eds.), 1968, New Perspectives in American Museum of Natural History, 1993, The First Humans. Archaeology. Aldine, Chicago. HarperSanFrancisco, San Francisco. Braidwood, R 1.,1960, Archaeologists and What They Do. Franklin American Museum of Natural History, 1993, People of the Stone Watts, New York. Age. HarperSanFrancisco, San Francisco. Branigan, Keith (ed.), 1982, The Atlas ofArchaeology. St. Martin's, American Museum of Natural History, 1994, New World and Pacific New York. Civilizations. HarperSanFrancisco, San Francisco. Bray, w., and Tump, D., 1972, Penguin Dictionary ofArchaeology. American Museum of Natural History, 1994, Old World Civiliza­ Penguin, New York. tions. HarperSanFrancisco, San Francisco. Brennan, L., 1973, Beginner's Guide to Archaeology. Stackpole Ashmore, w., and Sharer, R. J., 1988, Discovering Our Past: A Brief Books, Harrisburg, PA. Introduction to Archaeology. Mayfield, Mountain View, CA. Broderick, M., and Morton, A. A., 1924, A Concise Dictionary of Atkinson, R J. C., 1985, Field Archaeology, 2d ed. Hyperion, New Egyptian Archaeology. Ares Publishers, Chicago. York. Brothwell, D., 1963, Digging Up Bones: The Excavation, Treatment Bacon, E. (ed.), 1976, The Great Archaeologists. Bobbs-Merrill, and Study ofHuman Skeletal Remains. British Museum, London. New York. Brothwell, D., and Higgs, E. (eds.), 1969, Science in Archaeology, Bahn, P., 1993, Collins Dictionary of Archaeology. ABC-CLIO, 2d ed. Thames and Hudson, London. Santa Barbara, CA. Budge, E. A. Wallis, 1929, The Rosetta Stone. Dover, New York. Bahn, P.
    [Show full text]
  • A Logogram for YAH "Wound"
    Textdatenbank und Wörterbuch des Klassischen Maya Arbeitsstelle der Nordrhein-Westfälischen Akademie der Wissenschaften und der Künste an der Rheinischen Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn ISSN 2366-5556 RESEARCH NOTE 17 Published 23 Jun 2020 DOI: 10.20376/IDIOM-23665556.20.rn017.en A Logogram for YAH "Wound" Nikolai Grube1 1) Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität, Bonn Among the many logographic signs which so far have escaped decipherment is a head sign which shows a V-shaped stepped design in its interior1. Figure 1. The Logograph 1078 in its manifestations 1078vc, 1078va and 1078vs. Drawings by Christian Prager. The sign (Fig. 1) has been identified by Eric Thompson (1962) as T1078, and by Martha Macri and Mathew Looper (2003) as PE3. A closer look at the sign shows that its full form includes a small attached prefix with “darkness” markings (Fig. 2a-c). The example on a shell from Piedras Negras Burial 13 (Houston et al. 1998: Fig. 3) (Fig. 2c) shows that the prefixed sign has a small hook and that it most likely represents an obsidian tool, perhaps a knife, such as the personified obsidian eccentric knife on Piedras Negras Stela 8 (Fig. 2f). This affix has not received previous attention in any of the existing sign catalogues, although it does occurs independently in other contexts, such as within the stela names on the back sides of Copan Stelae F and M (Fig. 2d, e). The fact that the sign appears with exactly the same affixation when it has the “knife” sign attached to it and without it indicates 1 This research note appears a few days after a post on the blog „Maya Decipherment“ by Dimitri Beliaev and Stephen D.
    [Show full text]
  • 2 the Assyrian Empire, the Conquest of Israel, and the Colonization of Judah 37 I
    ISRAEL AND EMPIRE ii ISRAEL AND EMPIRE A Postcolonial History of Israel and Early Judaism Leo G. Perdue and Warren Carter Edited by Coleman A. Baker LONDON • NEW DELHI • NEW YORK • SYDNEY 1 Bloomsbury T&T Clark An imprint of Bloomsbury Publishing Plc Imprint previously known as T&T Clark 50 Bedford Square 1385 Broadway London New York WC1B 3DP NY 10018 UK USA www.bloomsbury.com Bloomsbury, T&T Clark and the Diana logo are trademarks of Bloomsbury Publishing Plc First published 2015 © Leo G. Perdue, Warren Carter and Coleman A. Baker, 2015 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or any information storage or retrieval system, without prior permission in writing from the publishers. Leo G. Perdue, Warren Carter and Coleman A. Baker have asserted their rights under the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act, 1988, to be identified as Authors of this work. No responsibility for loss caused to any individual or organization acting on or refraining from action as a result of the material in this publication can be accepted by Bloomsbury or the authors. British Library Cataloguing-in-Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library. ISBN: HB: 978-0-56705-409-8 PB: 978-0-56724-328-7 ePDF: 978-0-56728-051-0 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library. Typeset by Forthcoming Publications (www.forthpub.com) 1 Contents Abbreviations vii Preface ix Introduction: Empires, Colonies, and Postcolonial Interpretation 1 I.
    [Show full text]
  • The Depiction of the Arsacid Dynasty in Medieval Armenian Historiography 207
    Azat Bozoyan The Depiction of the ArsacidDynasty in Medieval Armenian Historiography Introduction The Arsacid, or Parthian, dynasty was foundedinthe 250s bce,detaching large ter- ritories from the Seleucid Kingdom which had been formed after the conquests of Alexander the Great.This dynasty ruled Persia for about half amillennium, until 226 ce,when Ardashir the Sasanian removed them from power.Under the Arsacid dynasty,Persia became Rome’smain rival in the East.Arsacid kingsset up theirrel- ativesinpositions of power in neighbouringstates, thus making them allies. After the fall of the Artaxiad dynasty in Armenia in 66 ce,Vologases IofParthia, in agree- ment with the RomanEmpire and the Armenian royal court,proclaimed his brother Tiridates king of Armenia. His dynasty ruled Armenia until 428 ce.Armenian histor- iographical sources, beginning in the fifth century,always reserved aspecial place for that dynasty. MovsēsXorenacʽi(Moses of Xoren), the ‘Father of Armenian historiography,’ at- tributed the origin of the Arsacids to the Artaxiad kingswho had ruled Armenia be- forehand. EarlyArmenian historiographic sources provide us with anumber of tes- timoniesregarding various representativesofthe Arsacid dynasty and their role in the spread of Christianity in Armenia. In Armenian, as well as in some Syriac histor- ical works,the origin of the Arsacids is related to King AbgarVof Edessa, known as the first king to officiallyadopt Christianity.Armenian and Byzantine historiograph- ical sources associate the adoption of Christianity as the state religion in Armenia with the Arsacid King Tiridates III. Gregory the Illuminator,who playedamajor role in the adoption of Christianity as Armenia’sstate religion and who even became widelyknown as the founder of the Armenian Church, belongstoanother branch of the samefamily.
    [Show full text]
  • Was the Function of the Earliest Writing in Egypt Utilitarian Or Ceremonial? Does the Surviving Evidence Reflect the Reality?”
    “Was the function of the earliest writing in Egypt utilitarian or ceremonial? Does the surviving evidence reflect the reality?” Article written by Marsia Sfakianou Chronology of Predynastic period, Thinite period and Old Kingdom..........................2 How writing began.........................................................................................................4 Scopes of early Egyptian writing...................................................................................6 Ceremonial or utilitarian? ..............................................................................................7 The surviving evidence of early Egyptian writing.........................................................9 Bibliography/ references..............................................................................................23 Links ............................................................................................................................23 Album of web illustrations...........................................................................................24 1 Map of Egypt. Late Predynastic Period-Early Dynastic (Grimal, 1994) Chronology of Predynastic period, Thinite period and Old Kingdom (from the appendix of Grimal’s book, 1994, p 389) 4500-3150 BC Predynastic period. 4500-4000 BC Badarian period 4000-3500 BC Naqada I (Amratian) 3500-3300 BC Naqada II (Gerzean A) 3300-3150 BC Naqada III (Gerzean B) 3150-2700 BC Thinite period 3150-2925 BC Dynasty 1 3150-2925 BC Narmer, Menes 3125-3100 BC Aha 3100-3055 BC
    [Show full text]
  • Handbücher Zur Sprach- Und Kommunikations- Wissenschaft
    Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikations- wissenschaft Handbooks of Linguistics and Communication Science Manuels de linguistique et des sciences de communication Mitbegründet von Gerold Ungeheuer (†) Mitherausgegeben 1985−2001 von Hugo Steger Herausgegeben von / Edited by / Edite´s par Herbert Ernst Wiegand Band 36 De Gruyter Mouton Brought to you by | Pontificio Istituto Biblico (Pontificio Istituto Biblico ) Authenticated | 172.16.1.226 Download Date | 3/2/12 1:49 PM The Semitic Languages An International Handbook Edited by Stefan Weninger In collaboration with Geoffrey Khan Michael P. Streck Janet C. E. Watson De Gruyter Mouton Brought to you by | Pontificio Istituto Biblico (Pontificio Istituto Biblico ) Authenticated | 172.16.1.226 Download Date | 3/2/12 1:49 PM ISBN 978-3-11-018613-0 e-ISBN 978-3-11-025158-6 ISSN 1861-5090 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Semitic languages : an international handbook / edited by Stefan Weninger ; in collaboration with Geoffrey Khan, Michael P. Streck, Janet C. E.Watson. p. cm. Ϫ (Handbooks of linguistics and communication science; 36) Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-3-11-018613-0 (hardcover : alk. paper) 1. Semitic languages Ϫ History Ϫ Handbooks, manuals, etc. 2. Semitic languages Ϫ Grammar Ϫ Handbooks, manuals, etc. I. Weninger, Stefan. II. Khan, Geoffrey. III. Streck, Michael P. IV. Watson, Janet C. E. PJ3014.S46 2012 492Ϫdc23 2011042304 Bibliographic information published by the Deutsche Nationalbibliothek The Deutsche Nationalbibliothek lists this publication in the Deutsche Nationalbibliografie; detailed bibliographic data are available in the Internet at http://dnb.d-nb.de. © 2011 Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co. KG, Berlin/Boston Typesetting: META Systems GmbH, Wustermark Printing: Hubert & Co.
    [Show full text]
  • Emancipation Through a Domestic Education: How One Magazine Inspired a Female Literary Renaissance in the Nineteenth-Century Middle East
    James Madison University JMU Scholarly Commons Senior Honors Projects, 2020-current Honors College 5-8-2020 Emancipation through a domestic education: How one magazine inspired a female literary renaissance in the nineteenth-century Middle East Lauren Palmieri Follow this and additional works at: https://commons.lib.jmu.edu/honors202029 Part of the Islamic World and Near East History Commons Recommended Citation Palmieri, Lauren, "Emancipation through a domestic education: How one magazine inspired a female literary renaissance in the nineteenth-century Middle East" (2020). Senior Honors Projects, 2020-current. 73. https://commons.lib.jmu.edu/honors202029/73 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Honors College at JMU Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Senior Honors Projects, 2020-current by an authorized administrator of JMU Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Emancipation Through a Domestic Education: How One Magazine Inspired a Female Literary Renaissance in the Nineteenth-Century Middle East _______________________ An Honors College Project Presented to the Faculty of the Undergraduate College of Arts and Letters James Madison University _______________________ by Lauren Samantha Palmieri May 2020 Accepted by the faculty of the Department of History, James Madison University, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Honors College. FACULTY COMMITTEE: HONORS COLLEGE APPROVAL: Project Advisor: Dr. Timothy J. Fitzgerald, Ph.D., Bradley R. Newcomer, Ph.D., Associate Professor, History Dean, Honors College Reader: Dr. Shah Mahmoud Hanifi, Ph.D., Professor, History Reader: Dr. Pia Antolic-Piper, Ph.D., Assistant Professor, Philosophy Table of Contents Acknowledgments ........................................................................................................................... 3 Abstract ..........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Towards the Understanding of Societal Cultures and Leadership
    Academic Leadership: The Online Journal Volume 5 Article 19 Issue 3 Fall 2007 10-1-2007 Towards The ndeU rstanding Of Societal Cultures And Leadership In Non-western Countries: An Exploratory Study On Egypt Abdel Moneim Follow this and additional works at: https://scholars.fhsu.edu/alj Part of the Educational Leadership Commons, Higher Education Commons, and the Teacher Education and Professional Development Commons Recommended Citation Moneim, Abdel (2007) "Towards The ndeU rstanding Of Societal Cultures And Leadership In Non-western Countries: An Exploratory Study On Egypt," Academic Leadership: The Online Journal: Vol. 5 : Iss. 3 , Article 19. Available at: https://scholars.fhsu.edu/alj/vol5/iss3/19 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by FHSU Scholars Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Academic Leadership: The Online Journal by an authorized editor of FHSU Scholars Repository. academicleadership.org http://www.academicleadership.org/185/towards_the_understand ing_of_societal_cultures_and_leadership_in_non- western_countries_an_exploratory_study_on_egypt/ Academic Leadership Journal INTRODUCTION There has been an increasingly considerable growth of interest in societal culture and leadership in recent years even though there is no shortage of writing on either topic. Numerous papers and books have been written on what they mean and why they are important. These topics have been heavily researched because it is believed that tremendous benefits can be gained when leaders understand the reasons why certain practices and behaviors are successful. More importantly, tremendous benefits can be gained when leaders truly understand the differences in cultures across nations, and incorporate this understanding in current leadership styles. Contemporary thinking has moved rather sharply away from the simple notion that a global measure of leader style could by itself account for any substantial amount of the variance in performance which varies from one country to the other.
    [Show full text]
  • Sphinx Sphinx
    SPHINX SPHINX History of a Monument CHRISTIANE ZIVIE-COCHE translated from the French by DAVID LORTON Cornell University Press Ithaca & London Original French edition, Sphinx! Le Pen la Terreur: Histoire d'une Statue, copyright © 1997 by Editions Noesis, Paris. All Rights Reserved. English translation copyright © 2002 by Cornell University All rights reserved. Except for brief quotations in a review, this book, or parts thereof, must not be reproduced in any form without permission in writing from the publisher. For information, address Cornell University Press, Sage House, 512 East State Street, Ithaca, New York 14850. First published 2002 by Cornell University Press Printed in the United States of America Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Zivie-Coche, Christiane. Sphinx : history of a moument / Christiane Zivie-Coche ; translated from the French By David Lorton. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 0-8014-3962-0 (cloth : alk. paper) 1. Great Sphinx (Egypt)—History. I.Tide. DT62.S7 Z58 2002 932—dc2i 2002005494 Cornell University Press strives to use environmentally responsible suppliers and materials to the fullest extent possible in the publishing of its books. Such materi­ als include vegetable-based, low-VOC inks and acid-free papers that are recycled, totally chlorine-free, or partly composed of nonwood fibers. For further informa­ tion, visit our website at www.cornellpress.cornell.edu. Cloth printing 10 987654321 TO YOU PIEDRA en la piedra, el hombre, donde estuvo? —Canto general, Pablo Neruda Contents Acknowledgments ix Translator's Note xi Chronology xiii Introduction I 1. Sphinx—Sphinxes 4 The Hybrid Nature of the Sphinx The Word Sphinx 2.
    [Show full text]