Bluewaters Power Station

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Bluewaters Power Station Bluewaters Power Station Griffin Energy Pty Ltd Report and recommendations of the Environmental Protection Authority Environmental Protection Authority Perth, Western Australia Bulletin 1160 January 2005 Environmental Impact Assessment Process Timelines Date Progress stages Time (weeks) 08/09/03 Level of Assessment set (following any appeals upheld) 2 31/05/04 Proponent Document Released for Public Comment 38 26/07/04 Public Comment Period Closed 8 2/12/04 Final Proponent response to the issues raised 19 17/01/05 EPA report to the Minister for the Environment 6 ISBN. 0 7307 6801 5 ISSN. 1030 - 0120 Assessment No. 1487 Summary and recommendations Griffin Energy Pty Ltd proposes to construct and operate the 200 megawatt (MW) Bluewaters Power Station on a site located approximately 4km north-east of Collie. This report provides the Environmental Protection Authority’s (EPA’s) advice and recommendations to the Minister for the Environment on the environmental factors relevant to the proposal. Section 44 of the Environmental Protection Act, 1986 requires the EPA to report to the Minister for the Environment on the environmental factors relevant to the proposal and on the conditions and procedures to which the proposal should be subject, if implemented. In addition, the EPA may make recommendations as it sees fit. Relevant environmental factors The EPA decided that the following environmental factors relevant to the proposal required detailed evaluation in the report: (a) Greenhouse gas emissions; (b) Atmospheric emissions; (c) Liquid and solid waste disposal; (d) Surface water and groundwater; and (e) Noise. There were a number of other factors which were relevant to the proposal, but the EPA is of the view that the information set out in Appendix 3 provides sufficient evaluation. Conclusion The EPA has considered the proposal by Griffin Energy Pty Ltd to construct and operate the 200 MW Bluewaters Power Station on a site located approximately 4km north-east of Collie. The EPA considers that combined cycle, gas fueled power plants represent best practice for large scale power generation. The proposed 200MW coal fired plant will produce an extra 620,000 tonnes of carbon dioxide per year compared to a combined cycle gas turbine plant of equivalent capacity. The EPA has previously advised that it expects proponents to mitigate all or part of the extra greenhouse gases produced. The EPA is satisfied that the proponent has investigated mitigation actions and notes that the quantity of greenhouse gases to be directly offset is about 201,000 tonnes per annum which is a worthwhile and useful package. It is, however, about 419,000 tonnes per annum less than the additional greenhouse gases produced by this proposal compared to a combined cycle gas turbine plant of equivalent capacity. i If a decision is made so that the proposal may be implemented, the EPA considers that the offsets offered by the proponent should be made legally enforceable and tied to this proposal for the life of the proposal. The EPA recognises that the issue of greenhouse gas management is a matter for judgment and that decisions about this proposal will include consideration of broader economic, regional development and strategic issues which are outside the scope of the EPA. From an environmental perspective, the EPA advises that a coal fired power station without full offsets will not deliver the best environmental outcome. The EPA also considers that the proposal does not represent best practice for sulphur dioxide emissions management and recommends that European Directive 2001/80/EC for outer regions be considered as the standard if the proposal proceeds to the Department of Environment licensing stage. With the exception of greenhouse gas management, the EPA has therefore concluded that it is unlikely that the EPA’s objectives would be compromised, provided there is satisfactory implementation by the proponent of their commitments and the recommended conditions set out in Appendix 4, and summarised in Section 4. The EPA also wishes to draw attention to the advice provided in Section 5 of this report in relation to air quality, offsets and the equitable internalisation of full environmental costs when considering proposals of this nature. Recommendations The EPA submits the following recommendations to the Minister for the Environment: 1. That the Minister notes that the proposal being assessed is for construction and operation of the 200 MW Bluewaters Power Station on a site located approximately 4km north-east of Collie. 2. That the Minister considers the report on the relevant environmental factors as set out in Section 3. 3. That the Minister notes that the EPA has concluded that, with the exception of greenhouse gas management, it is unlikely that the EPA’s objectives would be compromised, provided there is satisfactory implementation by the proponent of their commitments and the recommended conditions set out in Appendix 4, and summarised in Section 4. 4. That the Minister imposes the conditions and procedures recommended in Appendix 4 of this report. Conditions Having considered the proponent’s commitments and information provided in this report, the EPA has developed a set of conditions that the EPA recommends be imposed if the proposal by Griffin Energy Pty Ltd to construct and operate the 200 MW Bluewaters Power Station on a site located approximately 4km north-east of Collie is approved for implementation. These conditions are presented in Appendix 4. Matters addressed in the conditions include the following: ii (a) that the proponent shall fulfil the commitments in the Consolidated Commitments statement set out as an attachment to the recommended conditions in Appendix 4; (b) preparation and implementation of a greenhouse gas Emissions management plan; (c) preparation and implementation of a stack emissions management plan; and (d) compliance audit and performance reviews and a decommissioning plan. iii Contents Page Summary and recommendations.................................................................................i 1. Introduction and background.............................................................................1 2. The proposal.........................................................................................................1 3. Relevant environmental factors..........................................................................7 3.1 Greenhouse gas emissions .........................................................................7 3.2 Atmospheric emissions ............................................................................13 3.3 Liquid and solid waste disposal ...............................................................17 3.4 Surface water and groundwater ...............................................................20 3.5 Noise ........................................................................................................21 4. Conditions and Commitments ..........................................................................23 4.1 Proponent’s commitments .......................................................................23 4.2 Recommended conditions........................................................................24 5. Other Advice.......................................................................................................24 5.1 Industrial buffer………………………………………………………….24 5.2 Air quality management in the Collie region……………………………24 5.3 Greenhouse gas differential between fuel sources………………………25 6. Conclusions.........................................................................................................26 7. Recommendations..............................................................................................27 Tables Table 1: Summary of key proposal characteristics.......................................................6 Table 2: Proposed emissions compared to European Commission limits……...……15 Figures 1. Regional location...................................................................................................3 2. Plant layout............................................................................................................4 3. Input - output flow diagram ...................................................................................5 Appendices 1. List of submitters 2. References 3. Summary of identification of relevant environmental factors 4. Recommended Environmental Conditions and Proponent’s Consolidated Commitments 5. Summary of submissions and proponent’s response to submissions 6. Letter from Western Power 1. Introduction and background This report provides the advice and recommendations of the Environmental Protection Authority (EPA) to the Minister for the Environment on the environmental factors relevant to the proposal by Griffin Energy Pty Ltd, to construct and operate the 200 MW Bluewaters Power Station on a site located approximately 4km north-east of Collie. The proposal was referred to the EPA on 25 August 2003, and on 8 September 2003 the level of assessment was set at Public Environmental Review (PER) under Section 38 of the Environmental Protection Act, 1986. The PER document was made available for a public review period of 8 weeks commencing on 31 May 2004 and ending on 26 July 2004. The EPA’s decision to assess the proposal at the level of PER was based on 5 main factors, namely greenhouse gas emissions, atmospheric emissions, liquid and solid waste disposal, surface water and groundwater, and noise. Further
Recommended publications
  • EIS 305 Salinity in the Hunter River
    EIS 305 Salinity in the Hunter River: a report on the generation, treatment and disposal of saline minewater SALINITY IN THE HUNTER RIVER A REPORT ON THE GENERATION, TREATMENTAND DISPOSAL OF SALINE MINEWATER NEW SOUTH WALES COAL ASSOCIATION SALINITY IN THE HUNTER RIVER I. r A REPORT ON THE GENERATION, TREATMENT AND DISPOSAL OF SALINE MINEWATER I PREPARED FOR: PREPARED BY: NEW SOUTH WALES COAL ASSOCIATION CROFT & ASSOCIATES PTY. LIMITED • EAGLE HOUSE 125 BULLSTREET 25 WATT STREET P.O. BOX 5131B NEWCASTLE 2300 NEWCASTLE WEST 2302 049 26118 049261828 NATIONAL MUTUAL CENTRE LEVEL 2 IL 44 MARKET STREET SYDNEY 2000 02 297 202 DECEMBER 1983 91 if tiwtsiiiui'ti 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page SECTION 1: INTRODUCTION 1.1 STUDY BACKGROUND 1 1.2 STUDY OBJECTIVES 2 1.3 COMPANION STUDIES 3 1.4 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 3 SECTION 2: THE HUNTER REGION 2.1 GEOGRAPHY 4 2.2 GEOLOGY AND SOILS 4 2.3 METEOROLOGY 5 . 2.4 LAND USE 7 2.5 SURFACE WATERS 7 2.6 GROUNDWATER 8 SECTION 3: PROPOSED DEVELOPMENTS 3.1 REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT 9 3.2 COAL DEVELOPMENT 9 3.3 POWER GENERATION 11 3.4 COAL LIQUEFACTION 11 3.5 URBAN GROWTH 11 O 3.6 AGRICULTURE 12 3.7 FUTURE WATER REQUIREMENTS 12 SECTION 4 ORIGINS OF SALINITY 4.1 HISTORY OF SALINITY 14 4.2 HYDROLOGIC PROCESSES 14 4.3 TYPES OF LAND SALINISATION 15 4.4 DRY LAND SALINISATION 16 4.5 IRRIGATION SALINITY 16 SECTION 5 SALINITY MODEL FOR THE HUNTER RIVER 5.1 MODEL SPECIFICATION 18 5.2 DATA SOURCES 18 5.3 WATER RESOURCES COMMISSION MODEL 19 5.4 LOGIC NETWORK 19 5.5 METHODOLOGY 21 5.6 MODEL OUTPUT 24 SECTION 6: COLLIERY WATER BALANCES .
    [Show full text]
  • GRIFFIN ELECTRICITY PTY LTD Collie B Power Station
    GRIFFIN ELECTRICITY PTY LTD Collie B Power Station (Collie B) Proponent’s Response to Submissions April 2005 Table of Contents 1 SUMMARY OF SUBMISSIONS RECEIVED........................................................ 1 2 NOISE................................................................................................................... 3 3 SURFACE WATER AND GROUNDWATER ....................................................... 7 4 FLORA AND FAUNA ......................................................................................... 12 5 ATMOSPHERIC EMISSIONS ............................................................................ 13 6 GREENHOUSE ISSUES .................................................................................... 29 7 LIQUID AND SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL.......................................................... 38 8 SOCIAL AND HERITAGE ISSUES.................................................................... 51 9 OTHER ISSUES ................................................................................................. 52 10 GLOSSARY........................................................................................................ 56 11 BIBLIOGRAPHY ................................................................................................ 59 Collie B Power Station – Responses to Issues raised in Submissions Page i List of Tables Table 1 – Summary of Noise Levels ...................................................................................3 Table 2 - Collie Power Station Sound Power Level............................................................4
    [Show full text]
  • NZMT-Energy-Report May 2021.Pdf
    Acknowledgements We would like to thank Monica Richter (World Wide Fund for Nature and the Science Based Targets Initiative), Anna Freeman (Clean Energy Council), and Ben Skinner and Rhys Thomas (Australian Energy Council) for kindly reviewing this report. We value the input from these reviewers but note the report’s findings and analysis are those of ClimateWorks Australia. We also thank the organisations listed for reviewing and providing feedback on information about their climate commitments and actions. This report is part of a series focusing on sectors within the Australian economy. Net Zero Momentum Tracker – an initiative of ClimateWorks Australia with the Monash Sustainable Development Institute – demonstrates progress towards net zero emissions in Australia. It brings together and evaluates climate action commitments made by Australian businesses, governments and other organisations across major sectors. Sector reports from the project to date include: property, banking, superannuation, local government, retail, transport, resources and energy. The companies assessed by the Net Zero Momentum Tracker represent 61 per cent of market capitalisation in the ASX200, and are accountable for 61 per cent of national emissions. Achieving net zero emissions prior to 2050 will be a key element of Australia’s obligations under the Paris Agreement on climate (UNFCCC 2015). The goal of the agreement is to limit global temperature rise to well below 2 degrees Celsius above pre-industrial levels and to strive for 1.5 degrees. 2 Overall, energy sector commitments are insufficient for Australia to achieve a Paris-aligned SUMMARY transition to net zero. Australia’s energy sector This report finds none of the companies assessed are fully aligned with the Paris climate goals, and must accelerate its pace of most fall well short of these.
    [Show full text]
  • 2014-11-25 QWON Power Stations
    LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL C1379 QUESTION WITHOUT NOTICE (Of which some notice has been given) Tuesday, 25 November 2014 Hon Robin Chapple to the Leader ofthe House representing the Minister for Energy. Please provide a summary of all active power stations in Western Australia, including: age; capacity profile; fuel and/or mine type; number of employees; whether it is on or off the grid; and the closure schedule. I thankthe Hon. Member for some notice of this question. I table the attached document. The Public Utilities Office has relied on the Independent Market Operator for data concerning generators on the SWIS and has reported the maximum sent out capacity offered by these facilities into the Balancing Market, as of 25 November 2014. These figures may differ slightly from the number of capacity credits awarded and from facility nameplate capacity owing to factors including parasitic load and ambient temperature. For NWIS and NIS facilities, various sources have been used as there is no single definitive list of facilities. The nature of mining operations has not been investigated. The Public Utilities Office does not have access to data on the number of employees or on the closure schedule of power stations. The expected plant life of power stations is variable, a function of maintenance regimes and commercial considerations. ATTACHMENT TO QWN C1379 . 'I . " ~ -1J&1t~-n i ~,'l;(, : 'C' 4\", lTt ~A','~:'l';"(~.i~ffil!. " l]f,:,gl '~. l) , '. lifP'\1 ~, , •. 'fg~~t:t.: :' (~~.~:~n.', . ~ j - llll' ~!l!i:jliiW~tlilit~r~QJ\l1~~t~ii~Sys:t~m;(~~),~'•.
    [Show full text]
  • Climate Variability and Water Security for Power Generation
    Hydro-climatology: Variability and change (Proceedings of symposium JH02 held during 233 IUGG2011 in Melbourne, Australia, July 2011) (IAHS Publ. 344, 2011). Climate variability and water security for power generation ADAM M. WYATT & STEWART W. FRANKS University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales 2308, Australia [email protected] Abstract A reliable supply of fresh water is a critical component of coal fired power generation. During periods when water supplies are reduced, power generation may be limited, with obvious impacts on power consumers. Using the reconstructed historical streamflow series contained in the IQQM water allocation model, and simple water balance modelling, the water supply security of the Bayswater Power Station in the Hunter Valley, Australia, is assessed. The study revealed that the supply of water to the Bayswater Power Station is sensitive to extended dry periods, with some historical periods experiencing water shortfalls so severe that the station would be shut down without alternative water supplies. Key words climate variability; water supply security; water balance modelling; IQQM; Hunter Valley, Australia INTRODUCTION The purpose of this study is to determine the impact that climate processes such as the El Nino – Southern Oscillation have on the reliability of the water supply within the Hunter Valley, Australia. Specifically this study focuses on the water supply security necessary for power generation by Macquarie Generation at the Bayswater and Lake Liddell power stations. The generation of electricity using coal fired power stations such as Bayswater and Lake Liddell is dependent on a reliable supply of fresh water to replenish losses due to the operations of the power stations.
    [Show full text]
  • Scheme 1 Updated 10.01.19
    Universal Water Recycling EVERY DROP COUNTS UWR SCHEME 1 Presented By: Joe Taranto Universal Water Recycling 37 Moon Mountain Drive, Mount View NSW 2325 [email protected] www.uwr.com.au copyright c 2013 Joe Taranto [email protected] UWR U n i v e r s a l Wa t e r R e c y c l i n g “Scheme 1” “The Hunter Bayswater Recycling Water Scheme” This optimum Sustainable Water Recycling Project, I believe with a passion, is the most viable solution for ‘“The Lower Hunter Water Plan.” If we combine Scheme 1 and 2 together it will be a solution to drought proof the majority of the Hunter, it will then be of State and National Importance. Servicing communities, agriculture, industries and the environment for the next century.’ 2 copyright c 2013 Joe Taranto UWR U n i v e r s a l Wa t e r R e c y c l i n g Index Page 4 Executive Summary Page 6 Schematic Sketch of THBRWS. Page 7 Subsea HDPE 22klm Pipeline Route. Page 8 Volumes of Water the Lower Hunter Uses. Page 9 Water Recycling Page 10 Water Banking plus Financial Projections Page 11 Vision. Page 12 Water Restrictions. Advanced Water Treatment Plants (AWTP) Water Treatment Plant (WTP) Method to Dispose of Saline Water Page 13 Reservoirs, Information Page 14 Method to determine cost of an AWTP. Page 15 Origin Energy Quote Page 16 Questions regarding THBRWS Page 18 Questions regarding the Emergency Desalination Option Page 18 Quotes and statements Page 19 Emergency Desalination overview Page 20 Transfer cost per Megalitre and Per Kilolitre Page 21 Method to Obtain WTP Page 21 Water Extraction and Pumping Costs from the Hunter River.
    [Show full text]
  • 2018-19 Margin Peak and Margin Off-Peak Review AUSTRALIAN ENERGY MARKET OPERATOR
    A.1.1 2018-19 Margin Peak and Margin Off-peak Review AUSTRALIAN ENERGY MARKET OPERATOR Final report - PUBLIC 1.3 14 December 2017 Final report – PUBLIC 2018-19 Margin Peak and Margin Off-peak Review Project no: RO095900 Document title: Final report – PUBLIC Document no: 1.3 Date: 14 December 2017 Client name: Australian Energy Market Operator Client no: Project manager: Paul Nidras Author: Paul Nidras File name: I:\MMA\Projects\RO095900 AEMO MVR\Report\Final Report - PUBLIC v1.3.docx Jacobs Group (Australia) Pty Limited ABN 37 001 024 095 Floor 11, 452 Flinders Street Melbourne VIC 3000 PO Box 312, Flinders Lane T +61 3 8668 3000 F +61 3 8668 3001 www.jacobs.com Document history and status Version Date Description By Review Approved 1.0 29/11/2017 Draft final report derived from the confidential version G Gilotra, P Nidras P Nidras S Hyland 1.1 30/11/2017 Finalised report P Nidras P Nidras 1.2 6/12/2017 Minor correction made to margin value calculation P Nidras P Nidras 1.3 14/12/2017 Clarified commentary on results S Hyland P Nidras P Nidras 2 Final report – PUBLIC Contents Executive summary ....................................................................................................................................... 6 1. Introduction ......................................................................................................................................10 2. Methodology for calculating margin values .................................................................................11 2.1 Constraining units off to
    [Show full text]
  • Spinning Reserve Ancillary Service: Margin Values for the 2018–19 Financial Year Issues Paper
    Economic Regulation Authority Spinning reserve ancillary service: margin values for the 2018–19 financial year Issues Paper January 2018 Economic Regulation Authority 4th Floor Albert Facey House 469 Wellington Street, Perth Mail to: Perth BC, PO Box 8469 PERTH WA 6849 T: 08 6557 7900 F: 08 6557 7999 E: [email protected] W: www.erawa.com.au National Relay Service TTY: 13 36 77 (to assist people with hearing and voice impairment) We can deliver this report in an alternative format for those with a vision impairment. © 2018 Economic Regulation Authority. All rights reserved. This material may be reproduced in whole or in part provided the source is acknowledged. Economic Regulation Authority Contents 1. Introduction 2 Invitation to make submissions 3 2. Proposed margin values 4 3. What is spinning reserve and its opportunity cost? 5 4. What are margin values? 8 5. 2018–19 modelling of margin values 9 5.1. Determining the availability cost 11 5.2. Modelling outputs 14 Attachment 1. AEMO’s review of 2018–19 margin values 16 Issues paper: Margin values for the 2018–19 financial year 1 Economic Regulation Authority 1. Introduction Synergy is currently the default provider of the spinning reserve ancillary service under the Wholesale Electricity Market Rules (market rules).1 The market rules also allow other generators to provide spinning reserve through ancillary service contracts, provided they are less expensive than Synergy.2 Under the market rules, generators pay a contribution to the spinning reserve requirement.3 Payments are administered through the operation of the balancing market settlement process.
    [Show full text]
  • Answers to Questions Prior to Hearing
    Hon Mike Nahan MLA Treasurer; Minister for Energy; Citizenship and Multicultural Interests Ourref: 48-13528; 48-13527 Hon Ken Travers MLC Chairman Estimates and Financial Operations Committee Parliament House PERTH WA 6000 Attn: Mr Mark Warner Committee Clerk Dear Mr Travers QUESTIONS PRIOR TO 2014-15 ANNUAL REPORT HEARINGS - SYNERGY AND HORIZON POWER In response to the Committee's letter of 20 October 2015, please find attached responses to the questions prior to hearing, in respect of Synergy and Horizon Power's 2014-15 annual report. Yours sincerely DR MIKE NAHAN MLA TREASURER Att. CC: Hon Peter Collier MLC Minister representing the Minister for Energy in the Legislative Council 1 9 NOV 2015 Level 13, Dumas House, 2 Havelock Street, West Perth, Western Australia 6005 Telephone: +61 8 6552 5700 Facsimile: +61 8 6552 5701 Email: [email protected] ESTIMATES AND FINANCIAL OPERATIONS COMMITTEE 2014/15 ANNUAL REPORT HEARINGS QUESTIONS PRIOR TO HEARING Synergy Annual Report 2014/15 Hon Robin Chappie asked: 1) Page 5 under "Our Business," I ask: a) How many people are employed at each of your nine power stations? Answer: Employees (2014-15) Cockbum Power Station 19 Kalgoorlie Gas Turbine Mungarra Gas Turbine 5 Pinjar Power Station Kwinana Power Station (includes Kwinana Gas Turbines) 11 Geraldton Gas Turbine 0 Worsley (South West Co-Generation Joint Venture) 0 (operated by Worsley Alumina) Muja Power Station 337 Collie Power Station 1 FTE + contractors as required. How many people are employed at each of your nine wind farms? Answer: Employees (2014-15) Albany Wind Farm Bremer Bay Wind-Diesel System 4 Esperance Wind Farms Hopetoun Wind-Diesel System Coral Bay Wind-Diesel System 2 Denham Wind-Diesel System 2 Kalbarri Wind Farm 1 Mumbida Wind Farm 6 How many people are employed at your one solar farm? Answer: Employees (2014-15) Greenough River Solar Farm 1.5 2) Page 21 under "Delivering energy" you describe two station transformers failing and a partial cooling tower collapse at Muja Power Station, I ask: a) Have these issues been rectified? Answer: Yes.
    [Show full text]
  • Kemerton Power Station Referral Supporting Documentation Volume I
    U. Environmental ern.'iroi:,,:enta! scientists TRANSFIELD SERVICES TRANSFIELD SERVICES KEMERTON TRUST .. -. .. -- - * :*-. • KEMERTON POWER STATION REFERRAL SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION VOLUME I 1)oF Information Centre VERSION 3 \\l\\ll\\\ll\\ll\\l\l\\\\\ll\l\l\\\ll\ 006579 DECEMBER 2003 REPORT NO: 2003/179 621.311.2(941.21) SIN ATA Environmental DISCLAIMER This document is published in accordance with and subject to an agreement between ATA Environmental ("ATA") and the client for whom it has been prepared Transfield Services Kemerton Trust ("Client") and is restricted to those issues that have been raised by the client in its engagement of ATA and prepared using the standard of skill and care ordinarily exercised by Environmental Scientists in the preparation of such Documents. Any person or organisation that relies on or uses the document for purposes or reasons other than those agreed by ATA and the Client without first obtaining the prior written consent of ATA, does so entirely at their own risk and ATA denies all liability in tort, contract or otherwise for any loss, damage or injury of any kind whatsoever (whether in negligence or otherwise) that may be suffered as a consequence of relying on this Document for any purpose other than that agreed with the Client. QUALITY ASSURANCE ATA Environmental has implemented a comprehensive range of quality control measures on all aspects of the company's operation and has Quality Assurance certification to 150 9001. An internal quality review process has been applied to each project task undertaken by us. Each document is carefully reviewed by core members of the consultancy team and signed off at Director level prior to issue to the client.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Planning Report 2020
    Annual Planning Report 2020 Table of contents Section 1 Introduction 3 Section 2 Planning considerations 7 Section 3 Demand forecasts and scenario planning 13 Section 4 Emerging technology 17 Section 5 Key completed projects 23 Section 6 Transmission network issues and developments 27 Section 7 Distribution network issues and developments 49 Section 8 Conclusion 57 Appendix A Estimated maximum short circuit levels for 2019/20 59 Western Power Annual Planning Report 2020 1 2 Western Power Annual Planning Report 2020 1 Introduction Western Power Annual Planning Report 2020 3 Who we are For more than 70 years, We’re already harnessing new technology and are excited about further opportunities to Western Power has evolve with the changing energy needs of our provided Western customers to keep them connected every step of the way. Australians with safe, We build, operate and maintain the reliable and efficient transmission and distribution networks which cover a service area of over 255,000km². electricity. The transmission network is shown in the diagram on page 6. Our vast transmission and distribution network seamlessly connects our homes, businesses The network is inherently dynamic and and essential community infrastructure to an complex. Customers’ needs change and we increasingly renewable energy mix, to build our regularly receive new connection applications. State and meet the changing energy needs You should use the information in this report of Western Australians. We’re powered by only as a guide and we recommend that you community trust and the passion of our people. get in touch with us as early as possible when planning your project.
    [Show full text]
  • Bunbury-Geographe Regional Land Supply Assessment Report DRAFT for STAKEHOLDER REVIEW APRIL 2021
    URBAN DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM Bunbury-Geographe Regional Land Supply Assessment Report DRAFT FOR STAKEHOLDER REVIEW APRIL 2021 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF COUNTRY The Bunbury-Geographe sub-region is a contemporary description of portion of the ancestral lands of the Binjareb, Wilman, Wardandi and Ganeang Noongar people. The Department of Planning, Lands and Heritage acknowledges the First Australians as the traditional owners of these lands and pays respect to their Elders, both past and present. The Noongar (Koorah, Nitja, Boordahwan) (Past, Present, Future) Recognition Act 2016 recognises the Noongar people as the traditional owners of the Noongar lands. The Act recognises the living cultural, spiritual, familial and social relationship that the Noongar people have with the Noongar lands; and the significant and unique contribution that the Noongar people have made, are making, and will continue to make, to the heritage, cultural identity, community and economy of the State. The Act includes the following Noongar recognition statement: Noonakoort moort nitja burranginge noongar boodja Noonakoort moort kwomba Djinunge nitja mungarrt — koorah Noonakoort moort yirra yarkinje kwomba noongar boodja Koorah — nitja — boordahwan Noonakoort moort yarkinje noongar boodja Nyidiung koorah barminje noonakoort moort Wierrnbirt domberrinje Noonakoort moort koort boodja Nitja gnulla moorditj karrl boodja BUNBURY-GEOGRAPHE REGIONAL LAND SUPPLY ASSESSMENT DRAFT FOR STAKEHOLDER REVIEW Contents 1 Introduction 1.1 Regional land supply assessments and the Urban Development
    [Show full text]