Fishery Conservation and Management Pt. 635, App. A

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Fishery Conservation and Management Pt. 635, App. A Fishery Conservation and Management Pt. 635, App. A (15) As the owner of a vessel per- TABLE 1 OF APPENDIX A TO PART 635— mitted, or required to be permitted, in OCEANIC SHARKS—Continued the Atlantic HMS Angling or Atlantic HMS Charter/Headboat category, fail Lemon, Negaprion brevirostris to report a North Atlantic swordfish, Nurse, Ginglymostoma cirratum as specified in § 635.5(c)(2) or (c)(3). Scalloped hammerhead, Sphyrna (16) Possess any HMS, other than At- lewini lantic swordfish, harvested with buoy Smooth hammerhead, Sphyrna gear § 635.21(e). zygaena (17) Fail to construct, deploy, or re- Spinner, Carcharhinus brevipinna trieve buoy gear as specified at B. Small Coastal Sharks § 635.21(e)(4)(iii). Atlantic sharpnose, Rhizoprionodon terraenovae [64 FR 29135, May 28, 1999] Blacknose, Carcharhinus acronotus EDITORIAL NOTE: For FEDERAL REGISTER ci- Bonnethead, Sphyrna tiburo tations affecting § 635.71, see the List of CFR Finetooth, Carcharhinus isodon Sections Affected, which appears in the C. Pelagic Sharks Finding Aids section of the printed volume Blue, Prionace glauca and on GPO Access. Oceanic whitetip, Carcharhinus EFFECTIVE DATE NOTE: At 75 FR 57702, longimanus Sept. 22, 2010, § 635.71 was amended by revis- Porbeagle, Lamna nasus ing paragraphs (c)(5) and (6), effective Janu- Shortfin mako, Isurus oxyrinchus ary 1, 2011. For the convenience of the user, Thresher, Alopias vulpinus the revised text is set forth as follows: D. Prohibited Sharks § 635.71 Prohibitions. Atlantic angel, Squatina dumerili Basking, Cetorhinus maximus Bigeye sand tiger, Odontaspis noronhai * * * * * Bigeye sixgill, Hexanchus nakamurai (c) * * * Bigeye thresher, Alopias superciliosus (5) Retain onboard a vessel a longbill Bignose, Carcharhinus altimus spearfish, or a blue marlin, white marlin, Caribbean reef, Carcharhinus perezii roundscale spearfish, or sailfish that is less than the minimum size specified in Caribbean sharpnose, Rhizoprionodon § 635.20(d). porosus Dusky, Carcharhinus obscurus Galapagos, Carcharhinus galapagensis * * * * * Longfin mako, Isurus paucus (8) Take, retain, or possess an Atlantic Narrowtooth, Carcharhinus brachyurus blue marlin, white marlin, and roundscale Night, Carcharhinus signatus spearfish when the fishery for these species Sand tiger, Carcharias taurus has been restricted to catch and release fish- ing only, as specified in § 635.27(d). Sevengill, Heptranchias perlo Sixgill, Hexanchus griseus Smalltail, Carcharhinus porosus * * * * * Whale, Rhincodon typus APPENDIX A TO PART 635—SPECIES White, Carcharodon carcharias TABLES E. Smoothhound Sharks Smooth dogfish, Mustelus canis TABLE 1 OF APPENDIX A TO PART 635— Florida smoothhound, Mustelus norrisi OCEANIC SHARKS TABLE 2 OF APPENDIX A TO PART 635–PELAGIC A. Large Coastal Sharks SPECIES 1. Ridgeback sharks: Albacore tuna, Thunnus alalunga Sandbar, Carcharhinus plumbeus Bigeye tuna, Thunnus obesus Silky, Carcharhinus falciformis Blue shark, Prionace glauca Tiger, Galeocerdo cuvier Bluefin tuna, Thunnus thynnus Dolphin fish, Coryphaena hippurus 2. Non-ridgeback sharks: Oceanic whitetip shark, Carcharhinus Blacktip, Carcharhinus limbatus longimanus Bull, Carcharhinus leucas Porbeagle shark, Lamna nasus Great hammerhead, Sphyrna Shortfin mako shark, Isurus oxyrinchus mokarran Skipjack tuna, Katsuwonus pelamis 387 VerDate Mar<15>2010 11:07 Dec 21, 2010 Jkt 220228 PO 00000 Frm 00397 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8002 Y:\SGML\220228.XXX 220228 jdjones on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with CFR Pt. 640 50 CFR Ch. VI (10–1–10 Edition) Swordfish, Xiphias gladius PART 640—SPINY LOBSTER FISHERY Thresher shark, Alopias vulpinus OF THE GULF OF MEXICO AND Wahoo, Acanthocybium solandri Yellowfin tuna, Thunnus albacares SOUTH ATLANTIC TABLE 3 OF APPENDIX A TO PART 635– Subpart A—General Provisions DEMERSAL SPECIES Sec. Atlantic sharpnose shark, Rhizoprionodon 640.1 Purpose and scope. terraenovae 640.2 Definitions. Black grouper, Mycteroperca bonaci 640.3 Relation to other laws. Blackfin snapper, Lutjanus buccanella 640.4 Permits and fees. Blacknose shark, Carcharhinus acronotus 640.5 Recordkeeping and reporting. [Re- served] Blacktip shark, Carcharhinus limbatus 640.6 Vessel and gear identification. Blueline tilefish, Caulolatilus microps 640.7 Prohibitions. Bonnethead shark, Sphyrna tiburo 640.8 Facilitation of enforcement. Bull shark, Carcharhinus leucas 640.9 Penalties. Cubera snapper, Lutjanus cyanopterus Dog snapper, Lutjanus jocu Subpart B—Management Measures Finetooth shark, Carcharhinus isodon 640.20 Seasons. Gag grouper, Mycteroperca microlepis 640.21 Harvest limitations. Lane snapper, Lutjanus synagris 640.22 Gear and diving restrictions. Lemon shark, Negaprion brevirostris 640.23 Bag/possession limits. Mangrove snapper, Lutjanus griseus 640.24 Authorized activities. Marbled grouper, Dermatolepis inermis 640.25 Adjustment of management meas- Misty grouper, Epinephelus mystacinus ures. Mutton snapper, Lutjanus analis 640.26 Tortugas marine reserves. Nurse shark, Ginglymostoma cirratum 640.27 Spiny lobster import prohibitions. Queen snapper, Etelis oculatus FIGURE 1 TO PART 640 Red grouper, Epinephelus morio AUTHORITY: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq. Red hind, Epinephelus guttatus EDITORIAL NOTE: Nomenclature changes to Red snapper, Lutjanus campechanus part 640 appear at 74 FR 1152, Jan. 12, 2009. Rock hind, Epinephelus adscensionis Sand tilefish, Malacanthus plumieri Sandbar shark, Carcharhinus plumbeus Subpart A—General Provisions Schoolmaster snapper, Lutjanus apodus § 640.1 Purpose and scope. Silk snapper, Lutjanus vivanus Snowy grouper, Epinephelus niveatus (a) The purpose of this part is to im- Speckled hind, Epinephelus drummondhayi plement the Fishery Management Plan Spinner shark, Carcharhinus brevipinna for the Spiny Lobster Fishery of the Tiger shark, Galeocerdo cuvieri Gulf of Mexico and South Atlantic pre- Tilefish, Lopholatilus chamaeleonticeps pared by the South Atlantic and Gulf Vermilion snapper, Rhomboplites aurorubens of Mexico Fishery Management Coun- Warsaw grouper, Epinephelus nigritus cils under the Magnuson-Stevens Act. Yellowedge grouper, Epinephelus (b) This part governs conservation flavolimbatus and management of spiny lobster and Yellowfin grouper, Mycteroperca venenosa slipper (Spanish) lobster in the EEZ in Yellowtail snapper, Ocyurus chrysurus the Atlantic Ocean and Gulf of Mexico [64 FR 29135, May 28, 1999 as amended at 71 off the Atlantic and Gulf of Mexico FR 58174, Oct. 2, 2006; 75 FR 30528, June 1, states from the Virginia/North Caro- 2010] lina border south and through the Gulf of Mexico. This part also governs im- EFFECTIVE DATE NOTE: At 75 FR 30528, June portation of spiny lobster into any 1, 2010, the appendix to part 635 was amended place subject to the jurisdiction of the by revising table 1. Section E of this table contains information collection and record- United States. keeping requirements and will not become (c) An owner or operator of a vessel effective until approval has been given by that has legally harvested spiny lob- the Office of Management and Budget. sters in the waters of a foreign nation and possesses spiny lobster, or sepa- rated tails, in the EEZ incidental to such foreign harvesting is exempt from 388 VerDate Mar<15>2010 11:07 Dec 21, 2010 Jkt 220228 PO 00000 Frm 00398 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\220228.XXX 220228 jdjones on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with CFR.
Recommended publications
  • First Inland Record of Bull Shark Carcharhinus Leucas (Müller & Henle, 1839) (Carcharhiniformes: Carcharhinidae) in Celebes, Indonesia
    Ecologica Montenegrina 38: 12-17 (2020) This journal is available online at: www.biotaxa.org/em http://dx.doi.org/10.37828/em.2020.38.3 First inland record of Bull shark Carcharhinus leucas (Müller & Henle, 1839) (Carcharhiniformes: Carcharhinidae) in Celebes, Indonesia VERYL HASAN1,* & IZZUL ISLAM2 1Universitas Airlangga, Fisheries and Marine Faculty, Fish Health Management and Aquaculture Department, Dr. Ir. H. Soekarno street, Surabaya, East Java 60115, Indonesia. 2Universitas Teknologi Sumbawa, Biotechnology Faculty, Biotechnology Department, Olat Maras Street, Sumbawa, West Nusa Tenggara 84371, Indonesia *Corresponding author [[email protected]] Received 25 October 2020 │ Accepted by V. Pešić: 24 November 2020 │ Published online 26 November 2020. Abstract A single specimen (c. 86.2 cm) juvenile of Bull shark Carcharhinus leucas (Müller & Henle, 1839) was captured and photographed by local fisherman using a casting net on 13 February 2018 in Pangkajene River, about 16 km inland, Pangkajene District, South Celebes, Indonesia. This finding is considered as a first inland record of C. leucas in Celebes, and fourth inland records in Indonesia after Papua, Sumatra and Borneo. Monitoring is needed to asses the possibility of Celebes as a migration route and breeding ground of C. leucas. Key words: Biogeography, distribution, elasmobranch, freshwaters, requiem sharks. Introduction The Bull shark Carcharhinus leucas (Müller & Henle, 1839) is one of the few sharks that are truly euryhaline and is a common species that occurs in marine and coastal riverine environments and is wide- spread along the continental coast of all tropical and subtropical seas as well as numerous rivers, lakes, and estuaries (Compagno et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Coelho Phd Lantern S
    UNIVERSIDADEdo ALGARVE FaculdadedeCiênciasdoMaredo Ambiente Biology,populationdynamics,managementandconservation ofdeepwaterlanternsharks,Etmopterusspinax and Etmopteruspusillus (Chondrichthyes:Etmopteridae)insouthernPortugal(northeastAtlantic). (DoutoramentoemCiênciaseTecnologiasdasPescas,especialidadedeBiologiaPesqueira) (ThesisforthedegreeinDoctorofPhilosophyinFisheriesSciencesandTechnologies,specialtyinFisheriesBiology) RUIPEDROANDRADECOELHO Faro (2007) UNIVERSIDADE DO ALGARVE FACULDADE DE CIÊNCIAS DO MAR E DO AMBIENTE Biology, population dynamics, management and conservation of deep water lantern sharks, Etmopterus spinax and Etmopterus pusillus (Chondrichthyes: Etmopteridae) in southern Portugal (northeast Atlantic). (Doutoramento em Ciências e Tecnologias das Pescas, especialidade de Biologia Pesqueira) (Thesis for the degree in Doctor of Philosophy in Fisheries Sciences and Technologies, specialty in Fisheries Biology) RUI PEDRO ANDRADE COELHO Orientador / Supervisor: Prof. Doutor Karim Erzini Júri / Jury: - Prof. Doutor José Pedro Andrade, Professor Catedrático da Faculdade de Ciências do Mar e do Ambiente, Universidade do Algarve; - Prof. Doutor Karim Erzini, Professor Associado com Agregação da Faculdade de Ciências do Mar e do Ambiente, Universidade do Algarve; - Prof. Doutor Leonel Paulo Sul de Serrano Gordo, Professor Auxiliar com Agregação da Faculdade de Ciências, Universidade de Lisboa; - Prof. Doutor Manuel Seixas Afonso Dias, Professor Auxiliar da Faculdade de Ciências do Mar e do Ambiente, Universidade do Algarve;
    [Show full text]
  • Elasmobranch Biodiversity, Conservation and Management Proceedings of the International Seminar and Workshop, Sabah, Malaysia, July 1997
    The IUCN Species Survival Commission Elasmobranch Biodiversity, Conservation and Management Proceedings of the International Seminar and Workshop, Sabah, Malaysia, July 1997 Edited by Sarah L. Fowler, Tim M. Reed and Frances A. Dipper Occasional Paper of the IUCN Species Survival Commission No. 25 IUCN The World Conservation Union Donors to the SSC Conservation Communications Programme and Elasmobranch Biodiversity, Conservation and Management: Proceedings of the International Seminar and Workshop, Sabah, Malaysia, July 1997 The IUCN/Species Survival Commission is committed to communicate important species conservation information to natural resource managers, decision-makers and others whose actions affect the conservation of biodiversity. The SSC's Action Plans, Occasional Papers, newsletter Species and other publications are supported by a wide variety of generous donors including: The Sultanate of Oman established the Peter Scott IUCN/SSC Action Plan Fund in 1990. The Fund supports Action Plan development and implementation. To date, more than 80 grants have been made from the Fund to SSC Specialist Groups. The SSC is grateful to the Sultanate of Oman for its confidence in and support for species conservation worldwide. The Council of Agriculture (COA), Taiwan has awarded major grants to the SSC's Wildlife Trade Programme and Conservation Communications Programme. This support has enabled SSC to continue its valuable technical advisory service to the Parties to CITES as well as to the larger global conservation community. Among other responsibilities, the COA is in charge of matters concerning the designation and management of nature reserves, conservation of wildlife and their habitats, conservation of natural landscapes, coordination of law enforcement efforts as well as promotion of conservation education, research and international cooperation.
    [Show full text]
  • Serum Protein Variation in the Bull Shark, Carcharhinus Leucas Müller and Henle, 1841
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Investigations of the Ichthyofauna of Nicaraguan Lakes Papers in the Biological Sciences 1976 Serum Protein Variation in the Bull Shark, Carcharhinus Leucas Müller and Henle, 1841 C. Michael Cowan Associated Environmental Services Corp. Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/ichthynicar Part of the Aquaculture and Fisheries Commons Cowan, C. Michael, "Serum Protein Variation in the Bull Shark, Carcharhinus Leucas Müller and Henle, 1841" (1976). Investigations of the Ichthyofauna of Nicaraguan Lakes. 45. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/ichthynicar/45 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Papers in the Biological Sciences at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Investigations of the Ichthyofauna of Nicaraguan Lakes by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Published in INVESTIGATIONS OF THE ICHTHYOFAUNA OF NICARAGUAN LAKES, ed. Thomas B. Thorson (University of Nebraska-Lincoln, 1976). Copyright © 1976 School of Life Sciences, University of Nebraska-Lincoln. Int. J. Biochem., 1971,2,691-696. [Scientechnica (Publishers) Ltd.] 69 1 SERUM PROTEIN VARIATION IN THE BULL SHARK, CARCHARHINUS LEUCAS MULLER AND HENLE, 1841* C. MICHAEL COWAN Nebraska Wesleyan University, Lincoln, Nebraska, U.S.A. (Received 23 June, 1971) ABSTRACT I. A detailed electrophoretic study was made of different developmental stages of the bull shark, Carcharhinus leucas Milller and Henle, 1841. 2. Both qualitative and quantitative variations were found to exist between newborn and adult bull sharks. 3. Variations in the globulin portion may be related to the development of immuno­ globulins.
    [Show full text]
  • Feeding Habits of Blacktip Sharks, Carcharhinus Limbatus, and Atlantic
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Master's Theses Graduate School 2002 Feeding habits of blacktip sharks, Carcharhinus limbatus, and Atlantic sharpnose sharks, Rhizoprionodon terraenovae, in Louisiana coastal waters Kevin Patrick Barry Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_theses Part of the Oceanography and Atmospheric Sciences and Meteorology Commons Recommended Citation Barry, Kevin Patrick, "Feeding habits of blacktip sharks, Carcharhinus limbatus, and Atlantic sharpnose sharks, Rhizoprionodon terraenovae, in Louisiana coastal waters" (2002). LSU Master's Theses. 66. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_theses/66 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Master's Theses by an authorized graduate school editor of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. FEEDING HABITS OF BLACKTIP SHARKS, CARCHARHINUS LIMBATUS, AND ATLANTIC SHARPNOSE SHARKS, RHIZOPRIONODON TERRAENOVAE, IN LOUISIANA COASTAL WATERS A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College In partial fulfillment of the Requirements for the degree of Master of Science in The Department of Oceanography and Coastal Sciences by Kevin P. Barry B.S., University of South Alabama, 1996 August 2002 AKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to first and foremost thank my major professor, Dr. Richard Condrey, for giving me the opportunity to pursue this graduate degree. His willingness to accompany me during sampling trips, his enthusiasm and interest in my research topic, and his guidance throughout my time here has forged more than a major professor/graduate student relationship; it has formed a friendship as well.
    [Show full text]
  • States' Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Laws Hunting, Fishing, and Wildlife
    University of Arkansas Division of Agriculture An Agricultural Law Research Project States’ Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Laws Hunting, Fishing, and Wildlife Florida www.NationalAgLawCenter.org States’ Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Laws Hunting, Fishing, and Wildlife STATE OF FLORIDA 68B-44.002 FAC Current through March 28, 2020 68B-44.002 FAC Definitions As used in this rule chapter: (1) “Finned” means one or more fins, including the caudal fin (tail), are no longer naturally attached to the body of the shark. A shark with fins naturally attached, either wholly or partially, is not considered finned. (2) “Shark” means any species of the orders Carcharhiniformes, Lamniformes, Hexanchiformes, Orectolobiformes, Pristiophoriformes, Squaliformes, Squatiniformes, including but not limited to any of the following species or any part thereof: (a) Large coastal species: 1. Blacktip shark -- (Carcharhinus limbatus). 2. Bull shark -- (Carcharhinus leucas). 3. Nurse shark -- (Ginglymostoma cirratum). 4. Spinner shark -- (Carcharhinus brevipinna). (b) Small coastal species: 1. Atlantic sharpnose shark -- (Rhizoprionodon terraenovae). 2. Blacknose shark -- (Carcharhinus acronotus). 3. Bonnethead -- (Sphyrna tiburo). 4. Finetooth shark -- (Carcharhinus isodon). (c) Pelagic species: 1. Blue shark -- (Prionace glauca). 2. Oceanic whitetip shark -- (Carcharhinus longimanus). 3. Porbeagle shark -- (Lamna nasus). 4. Shortfin mako -- (Isurus oxyrinchus). 5. Thresher shark -- (Alopias vulpinus). (d) Smoothhound sharks: 1. Smooth dogfish -- (Mustelus canis). 2. Florida smoothhound (Mustelus norrisi). 3. Gulf smoothhound (Mustelus sinusmexicanus). (e) Atlantic angel shark (Squatina dumeril). (f) Basking shark (Cetorhinus maximus). (g) Bigeye sand tiger (Odontaspis noronhai). (h) Bigeye sixgill shark (Hexanchus nakamurai). (i) Bigeye thresher (Alopias superciliosus). (j) Bignose shark (Carcharhinus altimus). (k) Bluntnose sixgill shark (Hexanchus griseus). (l) Caribbean reef shark (Carcharhinus perezii).
    [Show full text]
  • 320 Part 640—Spiny Lobster Fishery of the Gulf Of
    Pt. 635, App. A 50 CFR Ch. VI (10–1–06 Edition) APPENDIX A TO PART 635—SPECIES Marbled catshark, Galeus arae TABLES Smallfin catshark, Apristurus parvipinnis Bigtooth cookiecutter, Isistius plutodus TABLE 1 OF APPENDIX A TO PART 635–OCEANIC Blainville’s dogfish, Squalus blainvillei SHARKS Bramble shark, Echinorhinus brucus Broadband dogfish, Etmopterus gracilispinnis A. Large coastal sharks: Caribbean lanternshark, Etmopterus hillianus Cookiecutter shark, Isistius brasiliensis 1. Ridgeback sharks: Cuban dogfish, Squalus cubensis Sandbar, Carcharhinus plumbeus Flatnose gulper shark, Deania profundorum Silky, Carcharhinus falciformis Fringefin lanternshark, Etmopterus schultzi Tiger, Galeocerdo cuvieri Great lanternshark, Etmopterus princeps Green lanternshark, Etmopterus virens 2. Non-ridgeback sharks: Greenland shark, Somniosus microcephalus Blacktip, Carcharhinus limbatus Gulper shark, Centrophorus granulosus Bull, Carcharhinus leucas Japanese gulper shark, Centrophorus acuus Great hammerhead, Sphyrna mokarran Kitefin shark, Dalatias licha Lemon, Negaprion brevirostris Lined lanternshark, Etmopterus bullisi Nurse, Ginglymostoma cirratum Little gulper shark, Centrophorus uyato Scalloped hammerhead, Sphyrna lewini Portuguese shark, Cetroscymnus coelolepis Smooth hammerhead, Sphyrna zygaena Pygmy shark, Squaliolus laticaudus Spinner, Carcharhinus brevipinna Roughskin spiny dogfish, Squalus asper Smallmouth velvet dogfish, Scymnodon B. Small coastal sharks: obscurus Smooth lanternshark, Etmopterus pusillus Atlantic sharpnose, Rhizoprionodon
    [Show full text]
  • Species Composition of the Largest Shark Fin Retail-Market in Mainland
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Species composition of the largest shark fn retail‑market in mainland China Diego Cardeñosa1,2*, Andrew T. Fields1, Elizabeth A. Babcock3, Stanley K. H. Shea4, Kevin A. Feldheim5 & Demian D. Chapman6 Species‑specifc monitoring through large shark fn market surveys has been a valuable data source to estimate global catches and international shark fn trade dynamics. Hong Kong and Guangzhou, mainland China, are the largest shark fn markets and consumption centers in the world. We used molecular identifcation protocols on randomly collected processed fn trimmings (n = 2000) and non‑ parametric species estimators to investigate the species composition of the Guangzhou retail market and compare the species diversity between the Guangzhou and Hong Kong shark fn retail markets. Species diversity was similar between both trade hubs with a small subset of species dominating the composition. The blue shark (Prionace glauca) was the most common species overall followed by the CITES‑listed silky shark (Carcharhinus falciformis), scalloped hammerhead shark (Sphyrna lewini), smooth hammerhead shark (S. zygaena) and shortfn mako shark (Isurus oxyrinchus). Our results support previous indications of high connectivity between the shark fn markets of Hong Kong and mainland China and suggest that systematic studies of other fn trade hubs within Mainland China and stronger law‑enforcement protocols and capacity building are needed. Many shark populations have declined in the last four decades, mainly due to overexploitation to supply the demand for their fns in Asia and meat in many other countries 1–4. Mainland China was historically the world’s second largest importer of shark fns and foremost consumer of shark fn soup, yet very little is known about the species composition of shark fns in this trade hub2.
    [Show full text]
  • From the Late Miocene Gatun Formation of Panama Catalina Pimiento,1,2,3 Gerardo Gonza´ Lez-Barba,4 Dana J
    Journal of Paleontology, 87(5), 2013, p. 755–774 Copyright Ó 2013, The Paleontological Society 0022-3360/13/0087-755$03.00 DOI: 10.1666/12-117 SHARKS AND RAYS (CHONDRICHTHYES, ELASMOBRANCHII) FROM THE LATE MIOCENE GATUN FORMATION OF PANAMA CATALINA PIMIENTO,1,2,3 GERARDO GONZA´ LEZ-BARBA,4 DANA J. EHRET,5 AUSTIN J. W. HENDY,1,2 1 2 BRUCE J. MACFADDEN, AND CARLOS JARAMILLO 1Florida Museum of Natural History, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA, ,[email protected].; ,[email protected].; ,[email protected].; 2Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute, Center for Tropical Paleoecology and Archaeology, Box 2072, Panama, Republic of Panama, ,[email protected].; 3Department of Biology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA; 4Museo de Historia Natural, Area de Ciencias del Mar, La Paz, Universidad Autonoma de Baja California Sur, AP 23080, Mexico, ,[email protected].; and 5Alabama Museum of Natural History, University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, Alabama, 35487, USA, ,[email protected]. ABSTRACT—The late Miocene Gatun Formation of northern Panama contains a highly diverse and well sampled fossil marine assemblage that occupied a shallow-water embayment close to a purported connection between the Pacific and Atlantic (Caribbean) oceans. However, the diverse chondrichthyan fauna has been poorly documented. Based on recent field discoveries and further analysis of existing collections, the chondrichthyan fauna from this unit comprises at least 26 taxa, of which four species are extinct today. The remaining portion of the total chondrichthyan biodiversity has affinities with modern taxa and is therefore comprised of long-lived species. Based on known records of the modern geographic distribution range of the Gatun chondrichthyans, the fauna has mixed biogeographic affinities suggesting that around 10 million yr ago, a connection likely occurred between the Pacific Ocean and the Caribbean Sea.
    [Show full text]
  • Common Sharks of the Northern Gulf of Mexico So You Caught a Sand Shark?
    Common Sharks of the Northern Gulf of Mexico So you caught a sand shark? Estuaries are ecosystems where fresh and saltwater meet The northern Gulf of Mexico is home to several shark and mix. Estuaries provide nursery grounds for a wide species. A few of these species very closely resemble variety of invertebrate species such as oysters, shrimp, one another and are commonly referred to as and blue crabs along finfishes including croaker, red “sand sharks.” drum, spotted seatrout, tarpon, menhaden, flounder and many others. This infographic will help you quickly differentiate between the different “sand sharks” and also help you Because of this abundance, larger animals patrol coastal identify a few common offshore species. Gulf waters for food. Among these predators are a number of shark species. Sharpnose (3.5 ft) Blacknose (4ft) Finetooth (4ft) Blacktip (5ft) Maximum size of Human (avg. 5.5ft) . the coastal Spinner (6ft) sharks are Bull (8ft) depicted in scale Silky (9ft) Scalloped Hammerhead (10ft) Great Hammerhead (13ft) Maximum Adult Size Adult Maximum Tiger (15ft) 5 ft 10 ft 15 ft Blacktip shark Atlantic sharpnose shark Carcharhinus limbatus Rhizoprionodon terraenovae Spinner shark Easy ID: White “freckles” on the body Easy ID: Pointed snout, anal fin lacks a black tip Carcharhinus brevipinna Finetooth shark Blacknose shark Carcharhinus isodon Carcharhinus acronotus Easy ID: Black tip on anal fin present Easy ID: Distinct lack of black markings on fins, extremely pointed snout Easy ID: Distinct black smudge on the tip of the snout,
    [Show full text]
  • Feeding Habits of the Tiger Shark, Galeocerdo Cuvier, in the Northwest Atlantic Ocean and Gulf of Mexico
    FEEDING HABITS OF THE TIGER SHARK, GALEOCERDO CUVIER, IN THE NORTHWEST ATLANTIC OCEAN AND GULF OF MEXICO by Alexandra Aines Dr. Andre Boustany, Advisor Dr. Pat Halpin, Advisor April 28, 2017 Masters project submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Master of Environmental Management degree in the Nicholas School of the Environment of Duke University EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Sharks are apex predators that structure marine communities through predation. Studies of diet and feeding patterns contribute to developing ecosystem models and it is critical that whenever possible, diet information specific to the area of concern is applied when developing an ecosystem model. Despite a number of studies conducted on tiger shark feeding, most comprehensive studies have been from the Pacific Ocean. There is little knowledge of the diet of tiger sharks in the Atlantic Ocean and Gulf of Mexico, with most studies in that area being localized and anecdotal. This study examines diet by life stage and tests for the presence of ontogenetic shifts, as well as how the diet of these sharks might be changing under certain environmental conditions and geographic variations. This study reviews the information collected on tiger shark feeding to date. It summarizes the results from previous studies on tiger shark diet: what prey items were found in studies of Pacific tiger sharks, and results from the anecdotal studies in the Atlantic, most of which took place in the early to mid 1900s, included small sample sizes, and were conducted in localized regions. For this study 169 sharks were caught as part of the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Multi-Year Movements of Adult and Subadult Bull Sharks (Carcharhinus Leucas): Philopatry, Connectivity, and Environmental Influences
    Aquat Ecol https://doi.org/10.1007/s10452-021-09845-6 (0123456789().,-volV)( 0123456789().,-volV) Multi-year movements of adult and subadult bull sharks (Carcharhinus leucas): philopatry, connectivity, and environmental influences Mitchell J. Rider . Laura H. McDonnell . Neil Hammerschlag Received: 9 December 2020 / Accepted: 20 February 2021 Ó The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V. 2021 Abstract Understanding the movement ecology of Biscayne Bay during the colder dry season (November marine species is important for conservation manage- to February) and lower residencies during the warmer ment and monitoring their responses to environmental wet season (June to October). These seasonal patterns change. In this study, adult and subadult bull sharks were supported by catch data from long-term fishery- (Carcharhinus leucas; n = 16) were acoustically independent shark surveys in the study area. During tagged in Biscayne Bay, Florida (USA), where they summer months when residencies of C. leucas were tracked locally via an array of 40 passive acoustic declined in Biscayne Bay, their residencies increased receivers, as well as regionally via cooperative in other regions (e.g., Florida Gulf Coast), demon- acoustic telemetry networks, with individuals tracked strative of seasonal migrations. Connectivity between up to 4.5 years. Detection data were used to assess areas of high use (Biscayne Bay and Florida Gulf philopatry, regional connectivity, and environmental Coast) was demonstrated by some individuals travel- correlates of shark habitat use. Spatial range varied per ing between these areas. Results from generalized individual; however, most individuals displayed high additive mixed models suggest that these movement residency to Biscayne Bay, exhibiting strong philopa- patterns could be partially driven by seasonal changes tric behavior to the tagging area.
    [Show full text]