DOCSLIB.ORG

6-23-20 Online Public Comments

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Page 1 of 14 Online Submitted Public Comments for the June 23, 2020 Regular Meeting of the Winchester Common Council Submissions Received (Online and Directly to Staff) As-Of 5:00PM on 6/23/20 Name: Don Warren Address: 516 Fairmont Ave. (and 39 W Jubal Early Dr.) (22601) Comments Related to Public Hearing? No Comments: Regarding the possibility of renaming Jubal Early Drive; Poll the businesses that such a change would affect. See what they think. It is easy to dictate change, but even easier to overlook the ramifications and trickle down effects that such a change can cause. Please don’t do so without asking those who will be directly affected and become financially obligated by such a change. The cost to businesses will not be small... especially amid the massive lull most businesses have experienced due to the COVID-19 lockdown. Replacing all letterhead, checks, deposit slips, business cards for multiple employees, print advertising, and everything else containing the business’ address can cost a small fortune. Not to mention the labor expense involved in notifying all the business contacts. As for my personal opinion, I don’t believe in shoving history under the rug. Keeping the names of these historical figures in the public eye serves to tell the story of our past, and how we as a people have evolved. Name: Thomas Earl Hickman Address: 157 Lambden Ave. (22601) Comments Related to Public Hearing? No Comments: I do not support changing the name of Jubal Early Dr., removing historical statues, or similar actions that seek to deny Winchester's rich historical heritage. Doing so does not change the history, but it weakens our understanding of it. Name: Lynn Dale Address: Whittier Ave. Comments Related to Public Hearing? No Comments: First off, the strategic plan cited seems a stretch as far as citing Goal IV (transparency, efficiency, innovation) as directly correlating to this resolution of the Mayor’s and City Council. Getting to the issue of this resolution to rename Jubal Early, Abrams Creek Pkwy makes the most sense given the geography described. IF Goal IV IS to apply to this issue, then let’s promote a culture of EFFICIENCY by so naming a road that runs between one Abrams Creek bridge and another bridge over Abrams Creek, and that is in proximity to Abrams Creek Preserve. Let’s be EFFICIENT in identifying a road by its location. As well, it shows an EFFICIENCY in communicating directions to others as Abrams Creek and Abrams Creek Preserve are relatable reference points. Let’s also be INNOVATIVE by NOT playing pseudo-politics. Let’s be TRANSPARENTLY striving for unity over Public Comments for the June 23, 2020 Meeting of the Winchester Common Council Page 2 of 14 devisiveness. Why assuage the emotions for some by deliberately antagonizing the feelings of others on this subject. If there is to be a name change, which appears to be inevitable, then why take steps to remove offense from one population only to give offense to another population. The debate of rightness or wrongness - the discussion of varying ideals, allegiances, and priorities aside - how about truly aiming for cohesiveness by NOT playing into controversy regardless of which side of the controversy one would be coming down on. If INNOVATIVE TRANSPARENCY is with intent for a best case scenario for ALL Winchester residents, then let’s NOT just swap numbers as to which residents are being provoked by the current road name in choosing the new road name. What is the history behind the naming of Abrams? If it’s historically controversial, then opt for Winchester Pkwy. If the naming of Winchester is likewise controversial, then new suggestions need to be sought out. Truly, are you looking to knit residents together or provide an unnecessary divisive element in this city? Let’s be different and lessen where we can, playing into an agenda narrative of disenfranchisement. Let’s thoughtfully and responsibly take steps aside of hostility. Healthy race relations do not pit one against another. Rather, it is to forge an environment where there is less conflict and greater harmony. Less conflict. Not different conflict. Less. Name: Marilyn Rae Heath Address: 221 Roszel Rd. (22601) Comments Related to Public Hearing? No Comments: Renaming Jubal Early Drive: To the Honorable Winchester City Council Members: My husband, Peter Johnson, and I, though not southern by birth or upbringing, ARE FIRMLY AGAINST REVISING HISTORY to current popular misconceptions and values. History should be true and factual. The cultural belief system ot each time period should also be considered. We need to learn from history, not extinguish it. As they say, if you do not know your history you will tend to repeat it. Where we were educated, the mid-west and west, we were taught that the Civil War was mostly started as a state's rights issue that incorporated slavery. Just because Winchester happens to be in the south (on the side that lost the war which, thereby, freed the slaves) and has quite an astonishing and admirable civil war history, especially having changed hands over 75 times, does not mean we should take away all that significance from public view due to some present day people being offended by it. The statues, names on buildings and street signs, and other honors given to these people at an earlier time was done to honor the person (or event) for many good and admirable accomplishments and traits. WE CANNOT TAKE OUR PRESENT DAY SECULAR CULTURAL VALUES AND IMPOSE THEM ON A TIME PERIOD LONG AGO. Much has changed over the years that have helped all races of color. We are all one race, just different shades of tan. There is more to be done, but that is mostly done by working on relationships with each other, really sharing our hearts and thoughts, and working on things that need adjustment. It is time to get rid of the hatred and division in our country and communities and come together as a united front to preserve the freedoms and history of our nation. Values and things like hatred are often taught and passed down from generation to generation. We should not fall prey to victimhood mentality and infringe on others with differences of opinion. Taking away America's proud heritage, the good and the bad, leads only to a nation without an identity or freedoms and opens us to a socialistic Marxist existence which will doom us. Why do you think other people from other nations want to live in America-the home of the free? Public Comments for the June 23, 2020 Meeting of the Winchester Common Council Page 3 of 14 It appears that this is a knee-jerk reaction due to an uproar over the slavery issue. All sides and thoughts should be addressed such as slavery has been around for thousands of years (not just black people enslaved and during the Civil War time period there were black slave owners as well), confusion over the slogan "black lives matter" (don't all lives matter?) and the Marxist organization Black Lives Matter, and other issues like the fact there is a high abortion rate of blacks so why do not unborn black babies matter?? The list goes on and on. Time to get back to the real crux of the matter-it is all a heart issue. What do you expect from a morally declining Godless world? So count us as a LOUD AND STRONG 'NO CHANGE' TO RENAMING JUBAL EARLY DRIVE OR ANY OTHER PRESENT DAY CIVIL WAR RELATED ENTITY. The same goes for removing or "hiding" them, such as memorials, elsewhere. We should tell the true facts of our history, warts and all. All are teachable moments. Name: Robert Patton Address: 1352 Ramseur Ln. (22601) Comments Related to Public Hearing? No Comments: As a homeowner in Winchester, I strongly urge keeping the street name (Jubal Early) as is. History should be appreciated, not rewritten, especially in its time context. Additionally, the cost of signage change plus the cost and stress of address change for property owners (homes/business) is incalculable without any appreciable benefit. KEEP the name! Name: Taylor Floyd Finley V Address: 3172 Valley Pike (22602) Comments Related to Public Hearing? No Comments: This comment is in regards to the discussion of the renaming of Jubal Early Drive. In light of recent events and with a man such as Early , why not replace the street name with a great African-American man with strong ties in the Winchester community? Taylor Floyd Finley, worked as one of the black communities only practicing dentist starting back in 1928. He was born in Winchester and stayed here his entire life while being a teacher and running a recreational center. One of his grandsons Donald Finley, Sr. was the first African-American man elected into Winchester City Council. And his son Donald Finley, Jr. is a well-respected and known police officer for Winchester. Many of Taylor’s decedents still live here in the Winchester area. Here is a link to the Taylor Finley Memorial with more information, that is in Winchester that you may have already seen before in our great city : https://www.hmdb.org/m.asp?m=96111 This suggestion isn’t simply an African-American related to the civil rights movement like some others. But one based on a man who had strong ties to the community, so much so he spent his life here and wanted to make it a better place despite the likely hardships he faced through discrimination/segregation at that time in history.
Recommended publications
  • No Words, No Problem, P.15 Genre Legends: 8Pm, Upfront Theatre

    No Words, No Problem, P.15 Genre Legends: 8Pm, Upfront Theatre

    THE GRISTLE, P.06 + ORCHARD OUTING, P.14 + BEER WEEK, P.30 c a s c a d i a REPORTING FROM THE HEART OF CASCADIA WHATCOM SKAGIT ISLAND COUNTIES 04-25-2018* • ISSUE:*17 • V.13 PIPELINE PROTESTS Protecting the Salish Sea, P.08 SKAGIT STOP Art at the schoolhouse, P.16 MARK LANEGAN A post- Celebrate AGI grunge SK T powerhouse, P.18 No words, no problem, P.15 Genre Legends: 8pm, Upfront Theatre Paula Poundstone: 8pm, Lincoln Theatre, Mount 30 A brief overview of this Vernon Backyard Brawl: 10pm, Upfront Theatre FOOD week’s happenings THISWEEK DANCE Contra Dance: 7-10:30pm, Fairhaven Library 24 MUSIC Dylan Foley, Eamon O’Leary: 7pm, Littlefield B-BOARD Celtic Center, Mount Vernon Skagit Symphony: 7:30pm, McIntyre Hall, Mount Vernon 23 WORDS FILM Book and Bake Sale: 10am-5pm, Deming Library Naomi Shihab Nye: 7pm, Performing Arts Center, Politically powered standup WWU 18 comedian Hari Kondabolu COMMUNITY MUSIC Vaisaikhi Day Celebration: 10am-5pm, Guru Nanak stops by Bellingham for an April Gursikh Gurdwaram, Lynden 16 GET OUT ART 29 gig at the Wild Buffalo Have a Heart Run: 9am, Edgewater Park, Mount Vernon 15 Everson Garden Club Sale: 9am-1pm, Everson- Goshen Rd. Native Flora Fair: 10am-3pm, Fairhaven Village STAGE Green 14 FOOD Pancake Breakfast: 8-10am, American Legion Hall, Ferndale GET OUT Pancake Breakfast: 8-10:30am, Lynden Community Center Bellingham Farmers Market: 10am-3pm, Depot 12 Market Square WORDS VISUAL Roger Small Reception: 5-7pm, Forum Arts, La WEDNESDAY [04.25.18] Conner 8 Spring has Sprung Party: 5-9pm, Matzke Fine Art MUSIC Gallery, Camano Island F.A.M.E.
  • New Design Water Treatment Plant /'7I.E.C

    New Design Water Treatment Plant /'7I.E.C

    Final Report Potomac River Source Water ~s.ejgitllm~tsjjK.,..~IW1I~ for Marylan . Prepared by: Becker and O'Melia, LLC in association with Straughan Environmental Services, Inc. Becker and O'Melia, LLC WATER PROCESS RESEARCHERS AND CONSULTANTS POTOMAC SOURCE WATER ASSESSMENTS Introduction The 1996 Safe Drinking Water Act Amendments required states to develop and implement source water assessment prograIlli to evaluate the safety of all public drinking water systems. A Source Water Assessment (SWA) is a process for evaluating the vulnerability to contamination ofthe source of a public drinking water supply. The assessment does not address the treatment processes, or the storage and distribution aspects of the water system, which are covered under separate provisions of the Safe Drinking Water Act. The Maryland Department of the Environment (MDE) is the lead state agency in this source water assessment effort. There are three main steps in the assessment process: (1) delineating the watershed drainage area that is likely to contribute to the drinking water supply, (2) identijYing potential contaminants within that area and (3) assessing the vulnerability, or susceptibility, of the system to those contaminants. Public notification is the final component of the source water assessment report process. The goal of the source water assessment program is to provide a framework for local stakeholders and governments in developing a Source Water Protection Plan. The source water assessments for Maryland water systems utilizing the Potomac River was undertaken as a joint effort by MDE, the Washington Suburban Sanitary Conunission (WSSC), and several consultants, including The Center for Watershep Ptotection, and Becker & O'Melia, the lead consultant.
  • NON-TIDAL BENTHIC MONITORING DATABASE: Version 3.5

    NON-TIDAL BENTHIC MONITORING DATABASE: Version 3.5

    NON-TIDAL BENTHIC MONITORING DATABASE: Version 3.5 DATABASE DESIGN DOCUMENTATION AND DATA DICTIONARY 1 June 2013 Prepared for: United States Environmental Protection Agency Chesapeake Bay Program 410 Severn Avenue Annapolis, Maryland 21403 Prepared By: Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin 51 Monroe Street, PE-08 Rockville, Maryland 20850 Prepared for United States Environmental Protection Agency Chesapeake Bay Program 410 Severn Avenue Annapolis, MD 21403 By Jacqueline Johnson Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin To receive additional copies of the report please call or write: The Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin 51 Monroe Street, PE-08 Rockville, Maryland 20850 301-984-1908 Funds to support the document The Non-Tidal Benthic Monitoring Database: Version 3.0; Database Design Documentation And Data Dictionary was supported by the US Environmental Protection Agency Grant CB- CBxxxxxxxxxx-x Disclaimer The opinion expressed are those of the authors and should not be construed as representing the U.S. Government, the US Environmental Protection Agency, the several states or the signatories or Commissioners to the Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin: Maryland, Pennsylvania, Virginia, West Virginia or the District of Columbia. ii The Non-Tidal Benthic Monitoring Database: Version 3.5 TABLE OF CONTENTS BACKGROUND ................................................................................................................................................. 3 INTRODUCTION ..............................................................................................................................................
  • Federal Register/Vol. 85, No. 135/Tuesday, July 14, 2020/Notices

    Federal Register/Vol. 85, No. 135/Tuesday, July 14, 2020/Notices

    42426 Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 135 / Tuesday, July 14, 2020 / Notices teleconference, notification and access District of Columbia West Virginia information will be posted by • Pan American Union Headquarters, • Bear Rocks and Allegheny Front September 9, 2020, to the Board’s Washington, DC Preserve, Grant and Tucker Counties, website at https://www.nps.gov/ WV advisoryboard.htm. Georgia The meeting is open to the public. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: (a) • Andalusia Farm (Flannery O’Connor Interested persons may choose to make For information concerning attending Home), Milledgeville, GA oral comments at the meeting during the the Board meeting or to request to Massachusetts designated time for this purpose. address the Board, contact Joshua Depending on the number of people • Winchell, Staff Director for the National Western Railroad Stone Arch Bridges wishing to comment and the time Park System Advisory Board, Office of and Chester Factory Village Depot, available, the amount of time for oral Policy, National Park Service, telephone Becket, Middlefield, and Chester, MA comments may be limited. Interested (202) 513–7053, or email joshua_ Michigan parties should contact the Staff Director [email protected]. (b) To submit a for the Board (see FOR FURTHER written statement specific to, or request • Minong Copper Mining District, Isle INFORMATION CONTACT), for advance information about, any NHL matter Royale National Park, Keweenaw placement on the public speaker list for listed below, or for information about County, MI this meeting. Members of the public the NHL Program or NHL designation Nebraska may also choose to submit written process and the effects of designation, comments by emailing them to joshua_ contact Sherry A.
  • Program Overview

    Program Overview

    WWeett WWaaddeerrss aanndd BBeeyyoonndd TThhee CCoonnddiittiioonn ooff OOuurr SSttaattee’’ss WWaatteerrss AA CCiittiizzeenn’’ss PPeerrssppeeccttiivvee 1 WV Department of Environmental Protection Division of Water and Waste Management, Nonpoint Section 601 57th Street, SE Charleston, WV 25304 The document was prepared by Tim Craddock, WV DEP’s Citizens’ Monitoring Coordinator and is available electronically in Portable Document Format (PDF). To request your copy send e-mail to Tim Craddock at: [email protected]. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Color photographs provided by: Alana Hartman, DEP’s Potomac Basin Coordinator; Abby Chappel, WV River Network; Sherry Evasic, Blue Heron Environmental Network; Neil Gillies, Cacapon Institute; Suzanne Hubbard, The Mountain Institute; Renee Cain, Lower West Fork Watershed Association; Martin Christ, Friends of Deckers Creek; Bobby Bonnett, Heizer-Manila Watershed Organization; Diana Green, Davis Creek Watershed Association; James Grey, Morris Creek Watershed Association; Larry Orr, Kanawha Valley Chapter of Trout Unlimited; Valerie Wilson, Science Teacher, Oak Hill Catholic Center; Brad Durst, WV Conservation Agency and Curtis Canada, Upper Guyandotte Watershed Association. WV Save Our Streams would like to recognize all the volunteer monitors, not only those directly associated with the program, but any others who have given their time and energy in an effort to protect our state’s streams and rivers. WV Save Our Streams would also like to recognize all of the agency and other partners who have provided assistance of any kind, to help guide volunteers through the myriad of processes involved with water quality issues. “Perception is not acquired by formal education, nor is it reserved for persons learned in the arts or sciences.
  • Road Log of the Geology of Frederick County, Virginia W

    Road Log of the Geology of Frederick County, Virginia W

    Vol. 17 MAY, 1971 No. 2 ROAD LOG OF THE GEOLOGY OF FREDERICK COUNTY, VIRGINIA W. E. Nunan The following road log is a guide to geologic The user of this road log should keep in mind features along or near main roads in Frederick that automobile odometers vary in accuracy. Dis- County, Virginia. Distances and cumulative mile- tances between stops and road intersections ages between places where interesting and repre- should be checked frequently, especially at junc- sentative-lithologies, formational contacts, struc- tions or stream crossings immediately preceding tural features, fossils, and geomorphic features stops. The Frederick County road map of the occur are noted. At least one exposure for nearly Virginia Department of Highways, and the U. S. each formation is included in the log. Brief dis- Geological Survey 7.5-minute topographic maps cussions of the geological features observable at are recommended for use with this road log. the various stops is included in the text. Topographic maps covering Frederick County include Boyce, Capon Bridge, Capon Springs, A comprehensive report of the geology of the Glengary, Gore, Hayfield, Inwood, Middletown, Mountain Falls, Ridge, Stephens City, Stephen- County is presented in "Geology and Mineral Re- son, Wardensville, White Hall, and Winchester. sources of Frederick County" by Charles Butts The route of the road log (Figure 1) shows U. S. and R. S. Edmundson, Bulletin 80 of the Virginia and State Highways and those State Roads trav- Division of Mineral Resources. The publication eled or needed for reference at intersections. has a 1:62,500 scale geologic map in color, which Pertinent place names, streams, and railroad is available from the Division for $4.00 plus sales crossings are indicated.
  • Health and History of the North Branch of the Potomac River

    Health and History of the North Branch of the Potomac River

    Health and History of the North Branch of the Potomac River North Fork Watershed Project/Friends of Blackwater MAY 2009 This report was made possible by a generous donation from the MARPAT Foundation. DRAFT 2 DRAFT TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF TABLES ...................................................................................................................................................... 5 TABLE OF Figures ...................................................................................................................................................... 5 Abbreviations ............................................................................................................................................................ 6 THE UPPER NORTH BRANCH POTOMAC RIVER WATERSHED ................................................................................... 7 PART I ‐ General Information about the North Branch Potomac Watershed ........................................................... 8 Introduction ......................................................................................................................................................... 8 Geography and Geology of the Watershed Area ................................................................................................. 9 Demographics .................................................................................................................................................... 10 Land Use ............................................................................................................................................................
  • Benthic Tmdls for the Goose Creek Watershed

    Benthic Tmdls for the Goose Creek Watershed

    Benthic TMDLs for the Goose Creek Watershed Submitted by Virginia Department of Environmental Quality Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation Prepared by Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin March 1, 2004 Revised April 27, 2004 ICPRB Report 04-5 This report has been prepared by the staff of the Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin. Support was provided by the Virginia Department of Environment Quality and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. The opinions expressed are those of the authors and should not be construed as representing the opinions or policies of the United States or any of its agencies, the several states, or the Commissioners of the Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin. Benthic TMDLs for the Goose Creek Watershed Submitted by Virginia Department of Environmental Quality Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation Prepared by Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin March 1, 2004 Revised April 27, 2004 __________________________________________ Benthic TMDLs For the Goose Creek Watershed TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS ........................................................................................................I LIST OF TABLES ................................................................................................................IV LIST OF FIGURES ..............................................................................................................VI EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...............................................................................................
  • A Brief Overview of Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act

    A Brief Overview of Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act

    A Brief Overview of Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act WSSI Workshop June 20, 2018 Ethel R. Eaton Senior Policy Analyst Department of Historic Resources 1 National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 The National Historic Preservation Act sets forth national policy, a broad philosophy, and a framework for decision making. The Legal Framework: Federal Preservation Responsibilities Section 106 requires that all federal agencies consider historic properties as part of their decision-making and calls for an advisory review of all federal undertakings What is Section 106? • The head of any Federal agency having direct or indirect jurisdiction over a proposed Federal or federally assisted undertaking in any State and the head of any Federal department or independent agency having authority to license any undertaking shall, prior to the approval of the expenditure of any Federal funds on the undertaking or prior to the issuance of any license, as the case may be, 4 • take into account the effect of the undertaking on any district, site, building, structure or object that is included in or eligible for inclusion in the National Register. The head of any such Federal agency shall afford the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation...a reasonable opportunity to comment What is Section 106? The section 106 process seeks to accommodate historic preservation concerns with the needs of Federal undertakings through consultation... commencing at the early stages of project planning. 36 CFR 800.1(a) 6 Section 106 is a process of consultation 7 Consultation! • Consultation means the process of seeking, discussing, and considering the views of other participants, and, where feasible, seeking agreement with them regarding matters arising in the section 106 process.
  • Great Smoky Mountains NATIONAL PARK Great Smoky Mountains NATIONAL PARK Historic Resource Study Great Smoky Mountains National Park

    Great Smoky Mountains NATIONAL PARK Great Smoky Mountains NATIONAL PARK Historic Resource Study Great Smoky Mountains National Park

    NATIONAL PARK SERVICE • U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Service National Park Great Smoky Mountains NATIONAL PARK Great Smoky Mountains NATIONAL PARK Historic Resource Study Resource Historic Park National Mountains Smoky Great Historic Resource Study | Volume 1 April 2016 VOL Historic Resource Study | Volume 1 1 As the nation’s principal conservation agency, the Department of the Interior has responsibility for most of our nationally owned public lands and natural resources. This includes fostering sound use of our land and water resources; protecting our fish, wildlife, and biological diversity; preserving the environmental and cultural values of our national parks and historic places; and providing for the enjoyment of life through outdoor recreation. The department assesses our energy and mineral resources and works to ensure that their development is in the best interests of all our people by encouraging stewardship and citizen participation in their care. The department also has a major responsibility for American Indian reservation communities and for people who live in island territories under U.S. administration. GRSM 133/134404/A April 2016 GREAT SMOKY MOUNTAINS NATIONAL PARK HISTORIC RESOURCE STUDY TABLE OF CONTENTS VOLUME 1 FRONT MATTER ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ............................................................................................................. v EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ..........................................................................................................
  • The Top 7000+ Pop Songs of All-Time 1900-2017

    The Top 7000+ Pop Songs of All-Time 1900-2017

    The Top 7000+ Pop Songs of All-Time 1900-2017 Researched, compiled, and calculated by Lance Mangham Contents • Sources • The Top 100 of All-Time • The Top 100 of Each Year (2017-1956) • The Top 50 of 1955 • The Top 40 of 1954 • The Top 20 of Each Year (1953-1930) • The Top 10 of Each Year (1929-1900) SOURCES FOR YEARLY RANKINGS iHeart Radio Top 50 2018 AT 40 (Vince revision) 1989-1970 Billboard AC 2018 Record World/Music Vendor Billboard Adult Pop Songs 2018 (Barry Kowal) 1981-1955 AT 40 (Barry Kowal) 2018-2009 WABC 1981-1961 Hits 1 2018-2017 Randy Price (Billboard/Cashbox) 1979-1970 Billboard Pop Songs 2018-2008 Ranking the 70s 1979-1970 Billboard Radio Songs 2018-2006 Record World 1979-1970 Mediabase Hot AC 2018-2006 Billboard Top 40 (Barry Kowal) 1969-1955 Mediabase AC 2018-2006 Ranking the 60s 1969-1960 Pop Radio Top 20 HAC 2018-2005 Great American Songbook 1969-1968, Mediabase Top 40 2018-2000 1961-1940 American Top 40 2018-1998 The Elvis Era 1963-1956 Rock On The Net 2018-1980 Gilbert & Theroux 1963-1956 Pop Radio Top 20 2018-1941 Hit Parade 1955-1954 Mediabase Powerplay 2017-2016 Billboard Disc Jockey 1953-1950, Apple Top Selling Songs 2017-2016 1948-1947 Mediabase Big Picture 2017-2015 Billboard Jukebox 1953-1949 Radio & Records (Barry Kowal) 2008-1974 Billboard Sales 1953-1946 TSort 2008-1900 Cashbox (Barry Kowal) 1953-1945 Radio & Records CHR/T40/Pop 2007-2001, Hit Parade (Barry Kowal) 1953-1935 1995-1974 Billboard Disc Jockey (BK) 1949, Radio & Records Hot AC 2005-1996 1946-1945 Radio & Records AC 2005-1996 Billboard Jukebox
  • Annual Maximum Stages and Discharges of Selected Streams in Virginia Through 1990

    Annual Maximum Stages and Discharges of Selected Streams in Virginia Through 1990

    ANNUAL MAXIMUM STAGES AND DISCHARGES OF SELECTED STREAMS IN VIRGINIA THROUGH 1990 By Byron J. Prugh, Jr., Edward H. Nuckels, and Clairiece G. Humphrey U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Open-File Report 90-587 Prepared in cooperation with the VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Richmond, Virginia 1991 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR MANUEL LUJAN, JR., Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Dallas L. Peck, Director For additional information Copies of this report can be write to: purchased from: Chief, Virginia District U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Geological Survey Books and Open-File Reports Section 3600 West Broad Street Federal Center, Box 25425 Room 606 Denver, Colorado 80225 Richmond, Virginia 23230 CONTENTS Page List of gaging stations for which records are published.............. iv Glossary............................................................. xx Abstract............................................................. 1 Introduction......................................................... 1 Purpose and scope................................................ 2 ................................................. 2 Explanation of data.................................................. 2 Records of annual maximum stages and discharges...................... 12 Index................................................................ 439 ILLUSTRATIONS Figure 1-4. Map showing location of gaging stations in: 1. The Ohio River Basin in Virginia........................ 4 2. The South Atlantic Slope basins in Virginia............. 6 3. The North Atlantic Slope