DOCSLIB.ORG

2011 Report on the Health of Colorado's

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
2011 Report on the Health of Colorado's 2011 Report on the Health of Colorado’s Forests Acknowledgments Thanks to William M. Ciesla, Forest Health Management International, Fort Collins, Colo., for his assistance in the development of this report and his work as a contributing author and photographer. Thanks to the following Colorado State Forest Service employees who served on the Report Working Group and/or provided information, guidance and feedback. Joseph A. Duda (Project Lead), Forest Management Division Supervisor, State Office S. Sky Stephens, Forest Entomologist, Forest Management Division, State Office Shelly Simmons, Assistant District Forester, La Junta District Rich Edwards, Assistant Staff Forester, Forest Management Division, State Office Jan Hackett, Policy and Legislative Affairs Program Manager, Outreach Division, State Office Megan Halford, Assistant District Forester, Franktown District Ryan Lockwood, Public and Media Relations Coordinator, Outreach Division, State Office Lisa Mason, Outreach Forester, Outreach Division, State Office Benjamin Pfohl, Assistant District Forester, Boulder District Kelly Rogers, District Forester, Grand Junction District GayLene Rossiter, Web Manager, Outreach Division, State Office Gregory D. Sundstrom, Assistant Staff Forester, Forest Management Division, State Office Matt Tansey, GIS Program Manager, State Office Thanks to those who reviewed and/or provided information for this report: Justin Backsen, Forestry Technician, Forest Health Protection, USDA Forest Service Kelly Sullivan Burns, Forest Pathologist, USDA Forest Service Bob Cain, Entomologist, Forest Health Protection, USDA Forest Service Whitney Cranshaw, Extension Entomologist, Department of Bioagricultural Sciences and Pest Management, Colorado State University Brian Howell, Aerial Survey Program Manager, Forest Health Protection, USDA Forest Service William Jacobi, Professor of Plant Pathology, Department of Bioagricultural Sciences and Pest Management, Colorado State University Dave Leatherman, Forest Entomologist (Retired), Colorado State Forest Service Roy Mask, Gunnison Service Center Group Leader, Forest Health Protection, USDA Forest Service Ned Tisserat, Extension Plant Pathologist, Department of Bioagricultural Sciences and Pest Management, Colorado State University Ralph Zentz, Assistant City Forester, City of Fort Collins Special thanks to: Judy Serby, Conservation Education Program Manager, and Katherine Timm, Outreach Division Supervisor, Colorado State Forest Service, for providing leadership in the production of this report. All photos by Bill Ciesla unless otherwise noted. Cover photo: © 2011 Colorado State University, John Eisele Photo, page 19, Kathryn Hardgrave Photo, top of page 23, Shelly Simmons Photo, page 37, Clinton Bellingar January 2012 It is once again my pleasure to present the annual report on the health of Colorado’s forests. This is the 11th consecutive year we have produced a report on the issues affecting Colorado’s forests, as well as the actions we can take to address those issues for the benefit of present and future generations. Over the last 10 years, Colorado’s forests have undergone significant changes. I have heard the public and political concerns about the condition of our forests, and related questions regarding what the future holds. The information we have developed and presented in this series of forest health reports, along with our collective experience in managing forested land, addresses these concerns and provides a sound foundation for planning. The fundamental questions we need to ask are What do we want our future forests to look like? and What do we want them to provide for us? Now is the right time to address these questions. We depend on our forests to provide a variety of resources and values; one of the most important is clean water. Forest planning is a long-term process, and the decisions we make today will have profound impacts on the form, function and productivity of our future forests. I hope you will find the information contained in this report to be informative and helpful. Please feel free to contact any Colorado State Forest Service office to learn more about our forests and what you can do to help manage and protect this important resource. Jeff Jahnke State Forester/Director Colorado State Forest Service Executive Summary The objective of the 2011 Report on the forests increased for the third successive Health of Colorado’s Forests is to provide year to 275,000 acres in 2011. Most of information on the condition of our forests the mortality in ponderosa pine forests to the Colorado General Assembly and occurred in Larimer County, north of the citizens of Colorado. In the first 10 reports, Big Thompson River. we provided this information, along with In the 2007 Report on the Health of sections that specifically addressed the Colorado’s Forests, we identified spruce various forest types in Colorado. This year’s bark beetle as the next forest insect report again presents a comprehensive challenge. This year, spruce beetle overview of the health of Colorado’s continued to impact mature Engelmann forests. It also provides insight on the spruce forests in many areas of the state. stewardship of our forests and the wood The largest outbreak, in the San Juan products they produce, as well as a special Mountains and upper Rio Grande Basin, section on the forests of the Great Plains. has spread north and now poses a threat As always, the primary data source to spruce forests on adjacent private lands. for this report is the annual aerial survey Most of the mature spruce trees already conducted by the Colorado State Forest have been killed in the Weminuche Service and USDA Forest Service (USFS). Wilderness, but active infestations Another data source for these reports continue in younger stands and in is the Colorado Forest Inventory and krummholz at the edge of timberline. Analysis (FIA) Program, funded by the Spruce beetle infestations also continued USFS and conducted on the ground by to build in the Greenhorn Peak area of the CSFS personnel. Every year, 10 percent Wet Mountains, where blowdown events of the 4,500 permanent forest plots in occurred in 2007 following a severe storm. Colorado are surveyed as part of the Additionally, infestations in Larimer program. In 2011, the first 10-year cycle County continued to impact mature of forest inventory data across Colorado spruce stands in the vicinity of Cameron was completed. A subset of FIA plots also Pass, Long Draw Reservoir and the Cache are revisited annually to measure and La Poudre Basin. track changes to forest conditions. The Other bark beetles that continued to FIA Program and other forms of forest damage Colorado forests in 2011 include monitoring data will continue to provide Douglas-fir beetle, which killed many essential information that will guide our mature Douglas-fir trees in the Sangre forest management activities and help us de Cristo and San Juan mountains, and western balsam bark beetle, which be proactive in addressing changing forest affected many high-elevation subalpine fir forests. An increase in activity conditions. by the piñon ips beetle also was noted in piñon pine forests north of Cañon Mountain pine beetle (MPB) continued City. to be Colorado’s most damaging forest pest Defoliation of Douglas-fir and white fir by western spruce budworm in 2011, with the heaviest damage again continued across portions of the Wet Mountains, Sangre de Cristo and occurring in Larimer County. However, Culebra ranges, and Spanish Peaks and San Juan Mountains, but at lower new tree mortality as a result of MPB infestation levels than in the recent past. A total area of 90,000 acres with declined in comparison to past years, some western spruce budworm defoliation was mapped in 2011. Forests with a total area of 752,000 acres infested, in portions of the Culebra Range, which have suffered defoliation for a compared to 878,000 acres in 2010. The number of years, have extensive top kill and tree mortality due to weakened decline in MPB activity is due to the loss trees caused by repeated western spruce budworm defoliation. of mature lodgepole pines in previous The area of aspen forests affected by sudden aspen decline (SAD) years of the outbreak. Despite the overall continued to decrease in 2011. Foresters believe this is due to a return to decline in acres infested by MPB, the area normal or near-normal precipitation levels, recovery of some individual of active infestation in ponderosa pine trees and a release of natural aspen regeneration in the understory of many stands with overstory mortality. 2 2011 Forest Health Report Thousand cankers disease continued to kill ornamental black walnut these include riparian forests, piñon- trees in urban forests and was observed for the first time in Fort Collins. juniper woodlands and forests planted as Special surveys once again were conducted to ensure early detection of windbreaks or in urban settings within our gypsy moth and emerald ash borer – two exotic insects that pose a threat to communities. These unique forests provide Colorado’s urban forests. Neither of these insects was detected in Colorado many essential benefits for people and in 2011. wildlife. Other pest activity detected in 2011 includes insect defoliation in aspen The CSFS continues to work with forests in portions of the Wet Mountains, Sangre de Cristo and Culebra private forest landowners, other ranges and San Juan Mountains, and an outbreak of an as-yet-unidentified cooperators and stakeholders to manage defoliating
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Colorado Fourteeners Checklist
    Colorado Fourteeners Checklist Rank Mountain Peak Mountain Range Elevation Date Climbed 1 Mount Elbert Sawatch Range 14,440 ft 2 Mount Massive Sawatch Range 14,428 ft 3 Mount Harvard Sawatch Range 14,421 ft 4 Blanca Peak Sangre de Cristo Range 14,351 ft 5 La Plata Peak Sawatch Range 14,343 ft 6 Uncompahgre Peak San Juan Mountains 14,321 ft 7 Crestone Peak Sangre de Cristo Range 14,300 ft 8 Mount Lincoln Mosquito Range 14,293 ft 9 Castle Peak Elk Mountains 14,279 ft 10 Grays Peak Front Range 14,278 ft 11 Mount Antero Sawatch Range 14,276 ft 12 Torreys Peak Front Range 14,275 ft 13 Quandary Peak Mosquito Range 14,271 ft 14 Mount Evans Front Range 14,271 ft 15 Longs Peak Front Range 14,259 ft 16 Mount Wilson San Miguel Mountains 14,252 ft 17 Mount Shavano Sawatch Range 14,231 ft 18 Mount Princeton Sawatch Range 14,204 ft 19 Mount Belford Sawatch Range 14,203 ft 20 Crestone Needle Sangre de Cristo Range 14,203 ft 21 Mount Yale Sawatch Range 14,200 ft 22 Mount Bross Mosquito Range 14,178 ft 23 Kit Carson Mountain Sangre de Cristo Range 14,171 ft 24 Maroon Peak Elk Mountains 14,163 ft 25 Tabeguache Peak Sawatch Range 14,162 ft 26 Mount Oxford Collegiate Peaks 14,160 ft 27 Mount Sneffels Sneffels Range 14,158 ft 28 Mount Democrat Mosquito Range 14,155 ft 29 Capitol Peak Elk Mountains 14,137 ft 30 Pikes Peak Front Range 14,115 ft 31 Snowmass Mountain Elk Mountains 14,099 ft 32 Windom Peak Needle Mountains 14,093 ft 33 Mount Eolus San Juan Mountains 14,090 ft 34 Challenger Point Sangre de Cristo Range 14,087 ft 35 Mount Columbia Sawatch Range
    [Show full text]
  • San Juan Landscape Rangeland Environmental Assessment, March
    United States Department of Agriculture Environmental Forest Service Assessment March 2009 San Juan Landscape Rangeland Assessment Ouray Ranger District and Gunnison Ranger District Grand Mesa, Uncompahgre, and Gunnison National Forests Ouray, Gunnison, Hinsdale Counties, Colorado Cover photo: Box Factory Park courtesy of Barry Johnston The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or part of an individuals income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA's TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write to USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, DC 20250-9410, or call (800) 795-3272 (voice) or (202) 720-6382 (TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. Environmental Assessment San Juan Landscape Rangeland Assessment San Juan Landscape Rangeland Assessment Environmental Assessment Ouray, Gunnison, Hinsdale Counties, Colorado Lead Agency: USDA Forest Service Grand Mesa, Uncompahgre and Gunnison National Forests Responsible Officials: Tamera
    [Show full text]
  • 2015 End-Of-Season Report
    COLOradO FOURTEENers INITIATIVE 1600 Jackson Street, Suite 352 • Golden, CO 80401 • (303) 278-7650 • www.14ers.org In this season of thankful reflection, we at Colorado Fourteeners Initiative want to acknowledge the many people like you who have contributed their time, talents and donations to help preserve and protect the Fourteeners. Our work would not be possible without your generosity. On behalf of CFI’s board and staff, please accept my sincere thanks for your continued support of our important mission. Lloyd F. Athearn Executive Director Future Projects >> Planning, logistics and fundraising are under way for a multi-year effort to reconstruct the three established routes on Mount Elbert, the state high point. Botanical surveys this summer found a couple of extremely rare plants within the identified trail corridor for the Southeast Ridge route. $315,000 After of in-kind value provided by these Opened 30th sustainably designed summit route volunteer efforts. featuring raised turnpikes and staircases. CFI SMASHES RECORDS AGAIN IN 2015 >> Trail maintenance staff increased from six members to eight. The up to sustainable levels will cost $24 million—$18 million to build 16 two four-person crews set an all-time record by engaging 1,550 days new sustainable routes and $6 million to continue reconstructing 26 of volunteer trail stewardship through 60 projects on 23 routes. This previously delineated routes. volunteer work provided an in-kind value of more than $315,000. >> CFI crews and volunteer Peak Stewards made an all-time high >> CFI opened its 30th sustainably designed route this summer: El number of on-mountain hiker contacts to impart Leave No Trace Diente Peak’s Kilpacker Basin.
    [Show full text]
  • High Country Climbs Peaks
    HighHig Countryh Country Cl iClimbsmbs The San Juan Mountains surrounding Telluride are among Colorado’s most beautiful and historic peaks. This chapter records some of the Telluride region’s most classic alpine rock routes. Warning: These mountain routes are serious undertakings that should only be attempted by skilled, experienced climbs. Numerous hazards—loose rock, severe lightning storms, hard snow and ice and high altitudes—will most likely be encountered. Come Prepared: An ice axe and crampons are almost always necessary for the approach, climb or descent from these mountains. Afternoon storms are very common in the summertime, dress accordingly. Loose rock is everpre- sent, wearing a helmet should be considered. Rating Mountain Routes: Most routes in this section are rated based on the traditional Sierra Club system. Class 1 Hiking on a trail or easy cross-country Class 2 Easy scrambling using handholds Class 3 More difficult and exposed scrambling, a fall could be serious Class 4 Very exposed scrambling, a rope may be used for belaying or short-roping, a fall would be serious Class 5 Difficult rockclimbing where a rope and protection are used Route Descriptions: The routes recorded here are mostly long scrambles with countless variations possible. Detailed route descriptions are not pro- vided; good routefinding skills are therefore required. Routes described are for early to mid-summer conditions. The Climbing Season: Climbers visit these mountains all year, but the main climbing season runs from June through September. Late spring through early summer is the best time, but mid-summer is the most popular. Less snow and more loose rock can be expected in late summer.
    [Show full text]
  • Southern Rockies Lynx Linkage Areas
    Southern Rockies Lynx Amendment Appendix D - Southern Rockies Lynx Linkage Areas The goal of linkage areas is to ensure population viability through population connectivity. Linkage areas are areas of movement opportunities. They exist on the landscape and can be maintained or lost by management activities or developments. They are not “corridors” which imply only travel routes, they are broad areas of habitat where animals can find food, shelter and security. The LCAS defines Linkage areas as: “Habitat that provides landscape connectivity between blocks of habitat. Linkage areas occur both within and between geographic areas, where blocks of lynx habitat are separated by intervening areas of non-habitat such as basins, valleys, agricultural lands, or where lynx habitat naturally narrows between blocks. Connectivity provided by linkage areas can be degraded or severed by human infrastructure such as high-use highways, subdivisions or other developments. (LCAS Revised definition, Oct. 2001). Alpine tundra, open valleys, shrubland communities and dry southern and western exposures naturally fragment lynx habitat within the subalpine and montane forests of the Southern Rocky Mountains. Because of the southerly latitude, spruce-fir, lodgepole pine, and mixed aspen-conifer forests constituting lynx habitat are typically found in elevational bands along the flanks of mountain ranges, or on the summits of broad, high plateaus. In those circumstances where large landforms are more isolated, they still typically occur within 40 km (24 miles) of other suitable habitat (Ruggerio et al. 2000). This distribution maintains the potential for lynx movement from one patch to another through non-forest environments. Because of the fragmented nature of the landscape, there are inherently important natural topographic features and vegetation communities that link these fragmented forested landscapes of primary habitat together, providing for dispersal movements and interchange among individuals and subpopulations of lynx occupying these forested landscapes.
    [Show full text]
  • Wild Olympics List of Endorsements
    June 8, 2019 The Honorable Debra A. Haaland 1237 Longworth House Office Building Washington, D.C., 20515 Chair Haaland and Members of the Subcommittee on National Parks, Forests and Public Lands, As an organization with a 125-year history dedicated to conserving outdoor access and promoting a love of the mountains, the Mazamas wishes to express our strong support for the Wild Olympics Wilderness and Wild and Scenic Rivers Act (H.R. 2642 and S. 1382). We much appreciate your consideration of the bill during the Subcommittee hearing scheduled for July 10, 2019. The mountains of the Olympic Peninsula provide tremendous outdoor recreation opportunities, including hiking and climbing destinations that are regular features in the Mazamas calendar of outings. By designating 126,661 acres of the Olympic National Forest as wilderness, the Act gives permanent protection to areas valued by climbers, including the proposed additions to the Mount Skokomish Wilderness. These designations will, in turn, benefit conservation efforts in Olympic National Park and existing wilderness areas on the Peninsula by distributing visitors across a larger number of locations. The designations in the Act will also benefit the economy of the Peninsula and the state. Engagement of stakeholders has led to revisions aimed at protecting timber jobs. The wild and scenic river designations will help sustain the shellfish industry. The recreation opportunities will contribute to the $26.2 billion in annual consumer spending and 201,600 jobs directed supported by outdoor recreation in Washington. The Act makes financial sense for the state. Few who visit the Olympic Peninsula ever forget its wild beauty.
    [Show full text]
  • William Henry Jackson Photochrom Collection Ca
    William Henry Jackson Photochrom Collection ca. 1895-1908 and n.d. Decker Library, Maryland Institute College of Art Collection Overview Repository: Decker Library, Maryland Institute College of Art, Baltimore, MD ​ Reference Code: whjph ​ Creator: William Henry Jackson and the Detroit Publishing Company. ​ Title: William Henry Jackson Photochrom Collection ​ Dates: ca. 1895-1908 and n.d. ​ Quantity: 187 items ​ Abstract: The collection consists of 187 photo-reproduction prints (most in color) made by the ​ William Henry Jackson and the Detroit Photographic Company. Historical / Biographical Note: William Henry Jackson (1843-1942) was an American painter, photographer and publisher. Already an accomplished painter, Jackson served in the Civil War, after which he traveled in the United States and abroad as a photographer under the auspices of several corporate and governmental entities, producing a large quantity of documentary images. In the 1890s, Jackson joined the Detroit Publishing Co. and provided them with his stock of ~10,000 negatives, which became the bulk of the company’s inventory. From the negatives, the company produced for images for sale, ranging from postcards to mammoth-plate panoramas. The images form an extensive documentary archive of the United States and nearby geographical areas. The collection here utilizes the Photochrom process, where colorized images are produced from black-and-white photographic negatives via the direct photographic transfer of a negative onto lithographic printing plates. The process is a photographic variant of chromolithography, a broader term that refers to color lithography in general. 1 Provenance: Gift, Caroline B. Bowersox, 2014 and 2015. ​ Accession: 2014.001.a, 2015.003a. ​ Processed by: Katherine Cowan, 2015.
    [Show full text]
  • 2007-075 Sneffels Wilderness Area Expansion
    RESOLUTION # 2016-009 RESOLUTION BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OURAY COUNTY Re: Sneffels Wilderness Expansion WHEREAS, the Sneffels range of the San Juan Mountains in Ouray County is an area of extraordinary scenic, environmental, economic, and recreational value; and WHEREAS, the existing Mount Sneffels Wilderness boundaries do not protect in perpetuity adjacent public lands in the Sneffels range which are capable and deserving of permanent Wilderness designation; and WHEREAS, a proposal to expand the existing Mount Sneffels Wilderness boundaries to include these public lands has been presented to the Ouray County Board of Commissioners as represented in a map entitled “Whitehouse Expansion Of The Mount Sneffels Wilderness” and referenced in Ouray County Resolutions 2007-075 and 2011-007; and WHEREAS, visitors and residents of Ouray County today enjoy these public lands for hiking, camping, photography, mountain climbing, hunting, skiing, scenic enjoyment and other wilderness uses; and WHEREAS, recreation and other uses of the public lands of Ouray County are a vital part of the local economy; and WHEREAS, these public lands provide important mid-elevation habitat for game and non-game wildlife and help connect wildlife habitat in the existing Mount Sneffels Wilderness Area to the west with habitat in the Big Blue Wilderness Area to the east; and WHEREAS, these public lands within the proposed wilderness expansion legislation include important watershed areas for domestic and agricultural water sources including Beaver Creek, the Town
    [Show full text]
  • Colorado Fourteeners Checklist
    Colorado Fourteeners Checklist Rank Mountain Peak Mountain Range Elevation Date Climbed 1 Mount Elbert Sawatch Range 14,440 ft 2 Mount Massive Sawatch Range 14,428 ft 3 Mount Harvard Sawatch Range 14,421 ft 4 Blanca Peak Sangre de Cristo Range 14,351 ft 5 La Plata Peak Sawatch Range 14,343 ft 6 Uncompahgre Peak San Juan Mountains 14,321 ft 7 Crestone Peak Sangre de Cristo Range 14,300 ft 8 Mount Lincoln Mosquito Range 14,293 ft 9 Castle Peak Elk Mountains 14,279 ft 10 Grays Peak Front Range 14,278 ft 11 Mount Antero Sawatch Range 14,276 ft 12 Torreys Peak Front Range 14,275 ft 13 Quandary Peak Mosquito Range 14,271 ft 14 Mount Evans Front Range 14,271 ft 15 Longs Peak Front Range 14,259 ft 16 Mount Wilson San Miguel Mountains 14,252 ft 17 Mount Shavano Sawatch Range 14,231 ft 18 Mount Princeton Sawatch Range 14,204 ft 19 Mount Belford Sawatch Range 14,203 ft 20 Crestone Needle Sangre de Cristo Range 14,203 ft 21 Mount Yale Sawatch Range 14,200 ft 22 Mount Bross Mosquito Range 14,178 ft 23 Kit Carson Mountain Sangre de Cristo Range 14,171 ft 24 Maroon Peak Elk Mountains 14,163 ft 25 Tabeguache Peak Sawatch Range 14,162 ft 26 Mount Oxford Collegiate Peaks 14,160 ft 27 Mount Sneffels Sneffels Range 14,158 ft 28 Mount Democrat Mosquito Range 14,155 ft 29 Capitol Peak Elk Mountains 14,137 ft 30 Pikes Peak Front Range 14,115 ft 31 Snowmass Mountain Elk Mountains 14,099 ft 32 Windom Peak Needle Mountains 14,093 ft 33 Mount Eolus San Juan Mountains 14,090 ft 34 Challenger Point Sangre de Cristo Range 14,087 ft 35 Mount Columbia Sawatch Range
    [Show full text]
  • [Ouray County] Weather
    THE [ouray county] Weather . .The Marketplace Schools . 8. Sports & Entertainment . 9. Calendar . 12 Sudoku . 12 Classifieds . The Marketplace WATCHVOLUME 2, NUMBER 38 | TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 16 - MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 22, 2008 WATCHN EWSPAPERS.COM HOPEFULS – Presidential hopeful Barack Obama appeared in Grand Junction at the Cross Orchards Historic Site on Monday morning, Sept. 15 to speak to a swing-state crowd about the economy and other issues. Over 45 Ouray County Democrats attended the event. The Ouray County Watch has posted a story at ouraycountywatch.com. More coverage will follow in Friday’s edition of The Telluride Watch. (Photo by Christopher Pike) Fall Rolls In and Haying Colorado’s Season Wraps Up Proposed New Haying a Steadfast rancher Cliff Ary, “You only get Grass is the primary hay crop one cutting of hay a year at this grown in the county, including Element of Ranching elevation.” So ranchers want to timothy grass, clover and orchard Roadless Rule Economy, Lifestyle make that one cutting count. grass. Ranchers at lower eleva- Irrigation begins early in the tions such as Montrose, Delta and Millions of Acres Could Be Opened to BY ERIN RALEY summer. Ary wets his 120-acre Grand Junction have the luxury of fields three to four times over growing alfalfa as well as grass Roads, Drilling, Power Lines OURAY COUNTY – The on- the season. He then starts cutting hay, and they are able to fit in a BY CHRISTINA CALLICOTT set of fall brings crisp air, golden around July 25 and, depending few cuttings a season. leaves and a fresh dusting of snow on the weather, lets the hay sit Sixty-one-year-old Henry on the peaks.
    [Show full text]
  • Abrams Mountain Scenic Special Interest Area
    Abrams Mountain Scenic Special Interest Area Proposed Designated Area Uncompahgre National Forest 3,000 acres Ouray Ranger District General Description At 12,801 feet, Abrams Mountain (aka Mount Abrams), is an iconic peak that rises steeply and directly above the city of Ouray and can be viewed for many miles while driving from Montrose toward Ouray. It is the centerpiece landscape feature for the City of Ouray and surrounding area. Gray Copper Falls and several other falls are outstanding scenic features just west of Brown Mountain. There are several historic mines on the slopes of Abrams Mountain and Brown Mountain. Elk, deer and bighorn sheep use the area. The area is not identified as a Colorado Roadless Area. Scenic Values Mount Abrams dominates the San Juan Skyway Scenic Byway for most of its length from Red Mountain Pass across Ironton Park. Its lush green slopes provide a spectacular backdrop to Ouray during the summer, and it is equally beautiful in the winter. From the summit, there are spectacular views to the south of the Red Mountains (1,2,3) and across the valley to Hayden Mountain. Abrams Mountain is part of the long four-mile Brown Mountain ridge, which rises up and down several summits to a high point of 13,339 feet that is the official summit of Brown Mountain. Also known as Duco Mountain, it is identified by a benchmark on the summit. The spectacular Gray Copper Falls and trail is directly west of the Brown Mountain summit. The upper end of the Gray Copper Falls trail intersects with a popular jeep trail spur off the Corkscrew Pass road near the Vernon mine, but the Gray Copper Falls Trail offers visitors a beautiful hike to see the falls.
    [Show full text]
  • Colbert, JD & Gaco, CM
    A GIS study of Rock Glacier features: Sneffels Range, Colorado Colbert, J.D. & Gaco, C.M. (advised by Kenny, R.) Geosciences Department, Fort Lewis College Abstract Methods GIS and Google Earth were used to interpret the surface • Google Earth was utilized to zoom in as close as possible and measure six morphology of rock glaciers in the Mount Sneffels Range individual rock glaciers. of Ouray County, Colorado. Measurements were collected • The length of the rock glacier was calculated by measuring from talus cone to for furrows and ridges of each rock glacier studied. The terminus. data that was collected was used to detect and present a • The width was calculated by taking three measurements (one near the terminus, trend in size, surface morphology, and deposition. one near the middle, and one near the talus). • The elevation of the talus cone and terminus were found by hovering the cursor Introduction over the area in Google Earth. • Sneffels Range is located in Ouray County ~10 km west • Furrow advancements were measured by lines between each ridge that was of Ouray, CO (figure 1) visible to the eye. • Mount Sneffels is the highest summit in the Sneffels • Four digital elevation models were mosaicked together and then a boundary of Range (14,138 ft.) Ouray County, Colorado was put on top with a symbol for Mt. Sneffels summit • Sneffels Range hosts more than 15 rock glaciers (Figure 1). though the study area only contained 6 rock glaciers • Average elevation, relief, and average furrow length were calculated using an (Figure 4) excel spreadsheet. • Rock Glaciers are lobate or tongue-shaped bodies of • A hillshade was derived from the downloaded digital elevation models and is frozen debris that are separated from the surrounding underlying the basemap (Figure 2).
    [Show full text]