DOCSLIB.ORG

Secure Dns & Building the Dns Community in Viet

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Secure Dns & Building the Dns Community in Viet SECURE DNS & BUILDING THE DNS COMMUNITY IN VIET NAM Nha Trang, August 23, 2019 Secure DNS Building the DNS Community in Viet Nam DNS Privacy DNS Privacy - Problem • Almost every activity on the Internet starts with a DNS query (and often several) • However DNS queries are sent in clear text (using UDP or TCP) which means passive eavesdroppers can observe all the DNS lookups performed • Some ISPs log DNS queries at the resolver and share this information with third-parties in ways not known or obvious to end users. • Some ISPs embed user information (e.g. a user id or MAC address) within DNS queries that go to the ISPs resolver in order to provide services such as Parental Filtering. This allows for fingerprinting of individual users. • Man-in-the-Middle (MITM): DNS Spoofing, DNS Hijacking DNS Privacy – The Solutions • Solutions • DNS-over-TLS (DoT) • DNS-over-HTTPS (DoH) • DNS over DTLS (DoD) • DNS Query Name Minimisation • DNSCrypt DoT/DoH Traditional DNS DNS-over-TLS (DoT) • Uses Transport Layer Security (TLS) for DNS queries and responses • All traffic is encrypted between the stub and recursive resolver • Stub able to authenticate the resolver • Requires support in stub and recursive resolver • TCP port 853 • RFC 7858 and RFC 8310 How DNS-over-TLS work? • When using DoT, the stub resolver will connect to the recursive DNS resolver over Transmission Control Protocol (TCP) port 853 • When the connection is made, a TLS handshake is initiated • When the TLS session is established, further communication will be encrypted DNS-over-HTTPS (DoH) • DNS over HTTPS • Uses an HTTPS session with a resolver • Similar to DNS over TLS, but with HTTP object semantics • Uses TCP port 443, so can be masked within other HTTPS traffic • Can use DNS wireformat or JSON format DNS payload • RFC 8484 How DoH work? • DoH uses HTTPS connections to encrypt DNS communication with TLS • Generally, the connection will be initiated in a comparable way to when a user would access any HTTPS (TLS) secured website • When the encrypted channel is created, DNS data will be encapsulated in HTTP POST/GET frames. • Depending on the implementation the payload of the frame will contain wire-format (Internet draft) or JSON (Google implementation) DNS data DoT Implementation Status DoT Implementation Status DoH Implementation Status • Clients: • Mozilla Firefox • Google Chrome • Server Software: • https://github.com/facebookexperimental/doh-proxy • https://github.com/curl/curl/wiki/DNS-over-HTTPS#doh- tools Android 9 – DNS over TLS by default DoT & DoH public recursors • Google DNS (8.8.8.8) • Cloudflare (1.1.1.1) • Quad9 (9.9.9.9) • CleanBrowsing DNS Flag Day What is DNS Flag Day? • DNS Flag Day is an initiative by the DNS Community to deprecate and remove support for an older DNS workaround that DNS vendors have been using for years • The goal is to make DNS software a little less complex, easier to maintain, have more predictable behavior, and improve performance. DNS Flag Day 2019 1. FEbruary 2019 What is the problem? • Authoritative DNS servers block responses, or don’t answer, or answer with the wrong packet. • In general, bad implementations of DNS not following the standards • Poorly implemented firewalls on the way, poor firewall rules blocking valid traffic or unaware of the standards • Resolvers have to send a query, wait for a timeout and retry using a different method: TCP or discard EDNS • Forces delays and thwarts innovation and deployment of new features What is the problem? Supporters DNS Flag Day 2020 • It will focus on the operational and security problems in DNS caused by Internet Protocol packet fragmentation. • Goal: • Eliminate operational issues caused by fragments • Improve security of DNS Eliminating fragments • For large DNS answers switch to TCP • No change for small answers - UDP • Existing standards • DNS over TCP in RFC 7766 and predecessors • Default EDNS buffer size ~= 1220 (= never fragment) • Non-compliance on several levels • Authoritative - do not listen on TCP • Authoritative - do not honor EDNS buffer size • Recursive (ignores TC=1) What is happening? • Authoritative side • Resolver side (operations) (operations) • Honor RFC 7766 • Honor RFC 7766 - DNS • Answer on TCP port 53 and check Transport over TCP your firewall, too! • Answer on TCP port 53 and • EDNS buffer size ~= 1220 to avoid check your firewall, too! fragmentation • EDNS buffer size ~= 1220 to • Defaults in software will reflect this avoid fragmentation • Resolvers MUST support fallback • Defaults in software will reflect this from UDP to TCP • Authoritative MUST NOT send • Standard compliant software does oversized answers not require changes • Standard compliant software does not require changes Testing • BIND • Tools with nice UI are coming • options { edns-udp-size 1220; max-udp- size 1220; }; • Manual test - all queries must • Knot DNS succeed • server: max-udp-payload: 1220 • $ dig +tcp @auth_IP • Knot Resolver yourdomain.example. • net.bufsize(1220) • $ dig +tcp @resolver_IP • PowerDNS Authoritative yourdomain.example. • udp-truncation-threshold=1220 • $ dig @resolver_IP test.knot- resolver.cz. TXT • PowerDNS Recursor • edns-outgoing-bufsize=1220 • udp-truncation-threshold=1220 • Unbound https://dnsflagday.nEt/2020/ • server: edns-buffer-size: 1220 • NSDserver: • ipv4-edns-size: 1220 • ipv6-edns-size: 1220 Get in touch • Web https://dnsflagday.net/ • Supporters • Twitter https://twitter.com/dnsflagday • Announcements: https://lists.dns- oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-announce • Questions: [email protected] oarc.net Deployment Root DNS in Vietnam Root DNS System DNS Community in Vietnam DNS Community in Vietnam • Purpose: Working • Activities: environment • Hosted and Operated by • To discuss about DNS topic VNNIC • To share knowledge and Experience • Mailinglist • Troubleshooting DNS • Social network: Facebook, • Members: DNS Administrator • Other App: Slack, Telegram,… of • DNS topics (technical updates, • Registrars protocols, DNS security • ISPs solutions, troubleshooting,…) • DNS Hosting Providers to discuss • Banks, Post offices • All members can discussion • Governments,… questions • Verify information by VNNIC DNS Community • Mailing list: • BIND Users Mailing List: https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users • DNS Operations (DNS-OARC): https://lists.dns- oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-operations • DNS Forum: • DNS-OARC • ICANN • APNIC • InternetSociety • Men and Mice • Name: Mr. Nguyen Van Tri • Email: [email protected] • Skype: nguyenvantri712 .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • DNS Spoofing 2
    Professor Vahab COMP 424 13 November 2016 DNS Spoofing DNS spoofing, also known as DNS Cache Poisoning, is one of the most widely used man-in-the-middle attacks that capitalizes on vulnerabilities in the domain name system that returns a false IP address and routes the user to a malicious domain. Whenever a machine contacts a domain name such as www.bankofamerica.com, it must first contact its DNS server which responds with multiple IP addresses where your machine can reach the website. Your computer is then able to connect directly to one of the IP addresses and the DNS is able to convert the IP addresses into a human-readable domain name. If an attacker is able to gain control of a DNS server and change some of its properties such as routing Bank of America’s website to an attacker’s IP address. At that location, the attacker is then able to unsuspectingly steal the user’s credentials and account information. Attackers use spam and other forms of attack to deliver malware that changes DNS settings and installs a rogue Certificate Authority. The DNS changes point to the hacker's secret DNS name server so that when the users access the web they are directed to proxy servers instead of authorized sites. They can also start to blacklist domains and frustrate the user with their day to day activities. All blacklisted domains would have their traffic dropped instead of forwarded to their intended destination. Based on the rogue Certificate Authority the system has no sign that an attack is taking place or ever took place.
    [Show full text]
  • Secure Shell- Its Significance in Networking (Ssh)
    International Journal of Application or Innovation in Engineering & Management (IJAIEM) Web Site: www.ijaiem.org Email: [email protected] Volume 4, Issue 3, March 2015 ISSN 2319 - 4847 SECURE SHELL- ITS SIGNIFICANCE IN NETWORKING (SSH) ANOOSHA GARIMELLA , D.RAKESH KUMAR 1. B. TECH, COMPUTER SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING Student, 3rd year-2nd Semester GITAM UNIVERSITY Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh India 2.Assistant Professor Computer Science and Engineering GITAM UNIVERSITY Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh India ABSTRACT This paper is focused on the evolution of SSH, the need for SSH, working of SSH, its major components and features of SSH. As the number of users over the Internet is increasing, there is a greater threat of your data being vulnerable. Secure Shell (SSH) Protocol provides a secure method for remote login and other secure network services over an insecure network. The SSH protocol has been designed to support many features along with proper security. This architecture with the help of its inbuilt layers which are independent of each other provides user authentication, integrity, and confidentiality, connection- oriented end to end delivery, multiplexes encrypted tunnel into several logical channels, provides datagram delivery across multiple networks and may optionally provide compression. Here, we have also described in detail what every layer of the architecture does along with the connection establishment. Some of the threats which Ssh can encounter, applications, advantages and disadvantages have also been mentioned in this document. Keywords: SSH, Cryptography, Port Forwarding, Secure SSH Tunnel, Key Exchange, IP spoofing, Connection- Hijacking. 1. INTRODUCTION SSH Secure Shell was first created in 1995 by Tatu Ylonen with the release of version 1.0 of SSH Secure Shell and the Internet Draft “The SSH Secure Shell Remote Login Protocol”.
    [Show full text]
  • Threat Modeling and Circumvention of Internet Censorship by David Fifield
    Threat modeling and circumvention of Internet censorship By David Fifield A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Computer Science in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Professor J.D. Tygar, Chair Professor Deirdre Mulligan Professor Vern Paxson Fall 2017 1 Abstract Threat modeling and circumvention of Internet censorship by David Fifield Doctor of Philosophy in Computer Science University of California, Berkeley Professor J.D. Tygar, Chair Research on Internet censorship is hampered by poor models of censor behavior. Censor models guide the development of circumvention systems, so it is important to get them right. A censor model should be understood not just as a set of capabilities|such as the ability to monitor network traffic—but as a set of priorities constrained by resource limitations. My research addresses the twin themes of modeling and circumvention. With a grounding in empirical research, I build up an abstract model of the circumvention problem and examine how to adapt it to concrete censorship challenges. I describe the results of experiments on censors that probe their strengths and weaknesses; specifically, on the subject of active probing to discover proxy servers, and on delays in their reaction to changes in circumvention. I present two circumvention designs: domain fronting, which derives its resistance to blocking from the censor's reluctance to block other useful services; and Snowflake, based on quickly changing peer-to-peer proxy servers. I hope to change the perception that the circumvention problem is a cat-and-mouse game that affords only incremental and temporary advancements.
    [Show full text]
  • Thesis That TW-OR Forwards All DNS Queries to a Resolver in China
    The Impact of DNSSEC on the Internet Landscape Von der Fakult¨atf¨urIngenieurwissenschaften, Abteilung Informatik und Angewandte Kognitionswissenschaft der Universit¨atDuisburg-Essen zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades Doktor der Ingenieurwissenschaften genehmigte Dissertation von Matth¨ausWander aus Lubin (L¨uben) Gutachter: Prof. Dr.-Ing. Torben Weis Prof. Dr.-Ing. Felix Freiling Tag der m¨undlichen Pr¨ufung:19. Juni 2015 Abstract In this dissertation we investigate the security deficiencies of the Domain Name System (DNS) and assess the impact of the DNSSEC security extensions. DNS spoofing attacks divert an application to the wrong server, but are also used routinely for blocking access to websites. We provide evidence for systematic DNS spoofing in China and Iran with measurement-based analyses, which allow us to examine the DNS spoofing filters from van- tage points outside of the affected networks. Third-parties in other countries can be affected inadvertently by spoofing-based domain filtering, which could be averted with DNSSEC. The security goals of DNSSEC are data integrity and authenticity. A point solution called NSEC3 adds a privacy assertion to DNSSEC, which is supposed to prevent disclosure of the domain namespace as a whole. We present GPU-based attacks on the NSEC3 privacy assertion, which allow efficient recovery of the namespace contents. We demonstrate with active measurements that DNSSEC has found wide adoption after initial hesitation. At server-side, there are more than five million domains signed with DNSSEC. A portion of them is insecure due to insufficient cryptographic key lengths or broken due to maintenance failures. At client-side, we have observed a worldwide increase of DNSSEC validation over the last three years, though not necessarily on the last mile.
    [Show full text]
  • Protecting Browsers from DNS Rebinding Attacks
    Protecting Browsers from DNS Rebinding Attacks Collin Jackson Adam Barth Andrew Bortz Stanford University Stanford University Stanford University [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Weidong Shao Dan Boneh Stanford University Stanford University [email protected] [email protected] ABSTRACT these security goals, modern browsers implement the same- DNS rebinding attacks subvert the same-origin policy of origin policy that attempts to isolate distinct “origins,” pro- browsers and convert them into open network proxies. We tecting sites from each other. survey new DNS rebinding attacks that exploit the inter- DNS rebinding attacks subvert the same-origin policy by action between browsers and their plug-ins, such as Flash confusing the browser into aggregating network resources Player and Java. These attacks can be used to circumvent controlled by distinct entities into one origin, effectively con- firewalls and are highly cost-effective for sending spam e- verting browsers into open proxies. Using DNS rebinding, mail and defrauding pay-per-click advertisers, requiring less an attacker can circumvent firewalls to spider corporate in- than $100 to temporarily hijack 100,000 IP addresses. We tranets, exfiltrate sensitive documents, and compromise un- show that the classic defense against these attacks, called patched internal machines. An attacker can also hijack the “DNS pinning,” is ineffective in modern browsers. The pri- IP address of innocent clients to send spam e-mail, commit mary focus of this work,
    [Show full text]
  • Dns / Opennic / Dnscrypt
    dns / opennic / dnscrypt Serial: 2015111401 What is DNS ● Domain Name System ● In simple words when you are looking for hackerspace.gr you 're looking for the IP of the server that hosts the hackerspace site. ● But how ? How DNS works public/open dns ● Goodle dns – 8.8.8.8 2001:4860:4860::8888 – 8.8.4.4 2001:4860:4860::8844 ● OpenDNS – 208.67.222.222 2620:0:ccc::2 – 208.67.220.220 2620:0:ccd::2 ● norton dns/comodo/dns advantage/dns.watch ● fdn/freeDNS/Verisign ● BUT THEY ALL track what you are watching!!!! https://www.opennicproject.org/ ● OpenNIC is an alternate network information center/alternative DNS root which lists itself as an alternative to ICANN and its registries. ● Total DNS Neutrality ● Have A Say In Your DNS ● Protect Your Privacy ● No More ISP DNS Hijacking ● No Cost (Gratis) ● Freedom From Government Intervention openic website/wiki New Top Level Domains .bbs .ing .dyn .micro .free .neo .fur .null .geek .oss .gopher .oz .indy .parody 1. How does opennic work? . 82796 IN NS ns9.opennic.glue. 82796 IN NS ns3.opennic.glue. 82796 IN NS ns8.opennic.glue. 82796 IN NS ns4.opennic.glue. 82796 IN NS ns10.opennic.glue. 82796 IN NS ns6.opennic.glue. 82796 IN NS ns7.opennic.glue. 82796 IN NS ns2.opennic.glue. ;; Received 174 bytes from 94.242.59.170#53(94.242.59.170) in 126 ms 2. gr. 172800 IN NS gr-br.ics.forth.gr. gr. 172800 IN NS gr-at.ics.forth.gr. gr. 172800 IN NS estia.ics.forth.gr.
    [Show full text]
  • DNS and the DNS Cache Poisoning Attack
    Lecture 17: DNS and the DNS Cache Poisoning Attack Lecture Notes on “Computer and Network Security” by Avi Kak ([email protected]) June 25, 2021 3:21pm ©2021 Avinash Kak, Purdue University Goals: The Domain Name System BIND Configuring BIND Running BIND on your Ubuntu laptop Light-Weight Nameservers (and how to install them) DNS Cache Poisoning Attack Writing Perl and Python code for cache poisoning attacks Dan Kaminsky’s More Virulent DNS Cache Poisoning Attack CONTENTS Section Title Page 17.1 Internet, Harry Potter, and the Magic of DNS 3 17.2 DNS 5 17.3 An Example That Illustrates Extensive DNS 13 Lookups in Even the Simplest Client-Server Interactions 17.4 The Domain Name System and The dig Utility 28 17.5 host, nslookup, and whois Utilities for Name 42 Lookup 17.6 Creating a New Zone and Zone Transfers 45 17.7 DNS Cache 48 17.7.1 The TTL Time Interval 51 17.8 BIND 56 17.8.1 Configuring BIND 58 17.8.2 An Example of the named.conf Configuration File 64 17.8.3 Running BIND on Your Ubuntu Laptop 68 17.9 What Does it Mean to Run a Process in a 70 chroot Jail? 17.10 Phishing versus Pharming 73 17.11 DNS Cache Poisoning 74 17.12 Writing Perl and Python Code for Mounting a 81 DNS Cache Poisoning Attack 17.13 Dan Kaminsky’s More Virulent Exploit for 92 DNS Cache Poisoning 17.14 Homework Problems 99 Computer and Network Security by Avi Kak Lecture 17 Back to TOC 17.1 INTERNET, HARRY POTTER, AND THE MAGIC OF DNS If you have read Harry Potter, you are certainly familiar with the use of owl mail by the wizards and the witches.
    [Show full text]
  • A Review of Man-In-The-Middle Attacks
    A Review of Man-in-the-Middle Attacks Subodh Gangan Abstract: This paper presents a survey of man-in-the-middle (MIM) attacks in communication networks and methods of protection against them. In real time communication, the attack can in many situations be discovered by the use of timing information. The most common attacks occur due to Address Resolution Protocol (ARP) cache poisoning, DNS spoofing, session hijacking, and SSL hijacking. Introduction Man-in-the-Middle (MIM) attacks make the task of keeping data secure and private particularly challenging since attacks can be mounted from remote computers with fake addresses. Whereas communications security was primarily that of breaking of encryption transformations (as in the case of the Enigma machine during the Second World War [1]), the problem of security in computer networks also involves active interference by intruders, and of these MIM attack is one of the most spectacular. The MIM attack takes advantage of the weaknesses in the authentication protocols being used by the communicating parties. Since authentication is generally provided by third parties who issue certificates, the system of certificate generation becomes another source of potential weakness. The MIM attack allows the intruder or the unauthorized party to snoop on data through the backdoor. This intervention is also being used by companies to pry upon their employees and for adware. For example, in early 2015, it was discovered that Lenovo computers came preinstalled with adware called Superfish that injects advertising on browsers such as Google Chrome and Internet Explorer. Superfish installs a self-generated root certificate into the Windows certificate store and then resigns all SSL certificates presented by HTTPS sites with its own certificate.
    [Show full text]
  • Attack Packet Victim Response Rate
    CS 361S Attacks on TCP/IP, BGP, DNS Denial of Service Vitaly Shmatikov slide 1 Reading Assignment “SYN cookies” by Bernstein “IP spoofing demystified” from Phrack magazine “It’s the end of the cache as we know it” by Kaminsky (BlackHat 2008) slide 2 Warm Up: 802.11b NAV (Network Allocation Vector) • 15-bit field, max value: 32767 • Any node can reserve channel for NAV microseconds • No one else should transmit during NAV period … but not followed by most 802.11b cards De-authentication • Any node can send deauth packet to AP • Deauth packet unauthenticated … attacker can repeatedly deauth anyone slide 3 Internet Is a Network of Networks backbone ISP local network Internet service provider (ISP) Autonomous system (AS) is a local network collection of IP networks under control of a single administrator (e.g., ISP) TCP/IP for packet routing and connections Border Gateway Protocol (BGP) for route discovery Domain Name System (DNS) for IP address discovery slide 4 OSI Protocol Stack email, Web, NFS application presentation RPC session TCP transport IP network Ethernet data link physical slide 5 Data Formats application Application data message layer transport TCP TCP TCP segment layer header data header data header data network IP TCP packet layer header header data data link Ethernet IP TCP Ethernet frame layer header header header data trailer slide 6 IP (Internet Protocol) Connectionless • Unreliable, “best-effort” protocol Uses numeric addresses for routing Typically several hops in the route Alice’s computer Bob’s ISP Packet Alice’s
    [Show full text]
  • Whac-A-Mole: Six Years of DNS Spoofing Lan Wei John Heidemann {Weilan,Johnh}@Isi.Edu University of Southern California/ Information Sciences Institute
    Whac-A-Mole: Six Years of DNS Spoofing Lan Wei John Heidemann {weilan,johnh}@isi.edu University of Southern California/ Information Sciences Institute ABSTRACT cryptographic signature that can verify each level of the DNS is important in nearly all interactions on the Internet. DNS tree from the root. Unfortunately, DNSSEC deployment All large DNS operators use IP anycast, announcing servers is far from complete, with names of many organizations in BGP from multiple physical locations to reduce client la- (including Google, Facebook, Amazon, and Wikipedia) still tency and provide capacity. However, DNS is easy to spoof: unprotected [23], in part because of challenges integrating third parties intercept and respond to queries for benign or DNSSEC with DNS-based CDN redirection. Even for domains malicious purposes. Spoofing is of particular risk for services protected by DNSSEC, client software used by many end- using anycast, since service is already announced from mul- users fail to check DNSSEC. tiple origins. In this paper, we describe methods to identify While there has been some study of how DNS spoofing DNS spoofing, infer the mechanism being used, and identify works [10], and particularly about the use of spoofing for organizations that spoof from historical data. Our methods censorship [15], to our knowledge, there has been little pub- detect overt spoofing and some covertly-delayed answers, lic analysis of general spoofing of DNS over time. (Wessels although a very diligent adversarial spoofer can hide. We currently has an unpublished study of spoofing [36].) Increas- use these methods to study more than six years of data about ing use of DNSSEC [11], and challenges in deployment [5] root DNS servers from thousands of vantage points.
    [Show full text]
  • How India Censors The
    How India Censors the Web Kushagra Singh∗ Gurshabad Grover∗ Varun Bansal Centre for Internet and Society Centre for Internet and Society Centre for Internet and Society [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] ABSTRACT First, the regulations do not mandate ISPs to use specific filter- One of the primary ways in which India engages in online censor- ing mechanisms. Thus, ISPs are are at liberty to employ various ship is by ordering Internet Service Providers (ISPs) operating in its technical methods [47]. jurisdiction to block access to certain websites for its users. This pa- Second, website-blocking orders, especially those issued by the per reports the different techniques Indian ISPs are using to censor Government, are rarely available in the public domain. ISPs are, in websites, and investigates whether website blocklists are consistent fact, mandated by regulations to maintain confidentiality of cer- across ISPs. We propose a suite of tests that prove more robust than tain website-blocking orders issued by the Government [3].Various previous work in detecting DNS and HTTP based censorship. Our attempts by researchers and advocacy organisations to obtain the tests also discern the use of SNI inspection for blocking websites, complete list of blocked websites have failed [4, 24]. which is previously undocumented in the Indian context. Using Third, the whimsy of ISPs and the Government aggravates these information from court orders, user reports and government orders, problems. Despite strict net neutrality regulations in India that we compile the largest known list of potentially blocked websites in prohibit ISPs from arbitrarily restricting access to websites [35], India.
    [Show full text]
  • DNS Spoofing and Poisoning
    DNS Spoofing and Poisoning: Trust, Danger, and Solutions Alex Polyakov [email protected] Mentor: Ming Chow, Department of Computer Science, Tufts University Abstract. The Domain Name System is the way in which human-readable domain names resolve to numeric IP addresses. This protocol is meant to facilitate an easy, streamlined navigation pattern for human users across the web. Unfortunately, the user-friendly choices made in the design of the protocol come with tradeoffs when considering the security qualities thereof. This paper is meant as an overview of the threats facing the protocol, and by extension users on networks where DNS is in use as an address resolution mechanism. We will explore methods of attacking the system as well as potential motivations and benefits for attackers. Finally, the paper will propose several techniques defend the system against attacks, both on the level of individual users or providers, and on the level of protocol features that govern the functionality of DNS. 1. Introduction – The Domain Name System The Domain Name System (DNS, for short), is the application-layer protocol which governs the way that Human-Readable addresses (i.e. a URI in the form “http://www.google.com”) resolve to numeric IP addresses for the purpose of sending requests and responses along a network. The chief use of DNS is to provide human users of the Internet with a way to access the network, but abstract away the necessity for users to memorize the actual numeric identifiers for the resources therein. Often, a network DNS is likened to a physical phonebook, where human-readable names are also translated to numeric identifiers for navigation of the network (i.e.
    [Show full text]