Taxonomy of Puffer Fish (Pisces: Tetraodontidae) Represented in the Catches of Visakhapatnam, Central Eastern Coast of India
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Available online at: www.mbai.org.in doi: 10.6024/jmbai.2015.57.2.1798-14 Taxonomy of puffer fish (Pisces: Tetraodontidae) represented in the catches of Visakhapatnam, central eastern coast of India K. Sujatha* and P. Padmavathi Department of Marine Living Resources, Andhra University, Visakhapatnam – 530003. Andhra Pradesh, India. * Correspondence e-mail: [email protected] Received: 05 Jun 2014, Accepted: 15 Dec 2015, Published: 27 Dec 2015 Original Article Abstract Introduction Fishes of the family Tetraodontidae popularly known as toad fishes, puffer fishes, blowfishes and globefishes have become Puffers of family Tetraodontidae are commercially valuable regular in the trawl catches of Visakhapanam. Therefore, and highly regarded as food fish, even though the presence there is an urgent need to have proper information on these resources for sustainable development and management of of specific toxin still causes death of gastronomers every year non-target species. The present paper provides a record of (Fiedler, 1991). Furthermore, there is an increasing demand for species, descriptions and biometric data of fishes of the tetraodontids in the aquarium trade. Although tetraodontids family Tetraodontidae off Visakhapatnam. Fifteen species are used commercially, basic ecological knowledge of natural belonging to six genera : Arothron, Canthigaster, Chelondon, populations is usually scarce. Lagocephalus, Takifugu and Torquigener are represented mainly in trawl and trammel net by- catches and shore seine The family Tetraodontidae is considered the most speciose catches in the coastal waters of Visakhapatnam. Arothron family in the order Tetraodontiformes incorporating twenty firmamentum was first record from Indian waters and circum global species Lagocephalus lagocephalus was first record seven genera with about 184 species (Matsuura, 2015). Many from mainland of India. recent ichthyologists reported new species, new records and provided key to the species of tetraodontids from different Keywords: Tetraodontid fishes, taxonomy, species regions of the world (Abe, 1952; De Beaufort and Briggs, composition, Visakhapatnam 1962; Matsuura and Toda, 1981; Hardy, 1983; 1984; Randall, 1985; Matsuura, 1986; 2001; 2002; Smith and Heemstra, 1986; Relini and Relini, 1995; Walker and Bussing, 1996; Nelson, 2006; Wu et al., 2011; Randall et al., 2012; Fricke et al., 2013). In India, previous studies were carried out by Russell (1803), Day (1878), Annandale and Jenkins (1910), Munro (1955), Jones and Kumaran (1980), Talwar and Jhingran (1991), Rao et al. (1992), Sujatha (1995, 1996), Sujatha and Chakravarty (2003). However there remain taxonomic J. Mar. Biol. Ass. India, 57 (2), July-December 2015 K. Sujatha and P. Padmavathi problems in genera such as Arothron, Chelonodontops, related species of the genera Arothron and Lagocephalus Lagocephalus, Pao, Takifugu and Torquigener where, many using SPSS (13.0) software. Before computation, all species await description and detailed morphological and these characters were adjusted to pool information from molecular comparisons to classify them into appropriate different characters into a comparable scale following groups. The amorphous body and loose skin, proportional standard procedure of Thorpe (1983). Because of the measurements vary greatly within species (Randall, 1985). variation in size of fish, morphometric data was statistically This paper provides photographs of the species of the adjusted to permit comparative analysis in terms of shape family Tetraodontidae, descriptions based on colour pattern, independent of size. The factor loadings for first three biometric data and results of multivariate analysis (Principal principal components were taken and characters for which Component Analysis – PCA), represented in the catches of factor loadings above 0.9 were considered. The variance Visakhapatnam (Lat 17˚10’-18˚10’N Long. 82˚50’-84˚10’E) explained by three components was 75% in genus Arothron for correct identification of species. and 72% in genus Lagocephalus. Tukey test was carried out only for those characters that became significantly Material and methods different for morphometric and meristic characters among the four species of genus Arothron and five species of The present study is based on random samples collected Lagocephalus. mainly from trawl by-catches at Visakhapatnam fisheries harbour during the period of January 2012 to December 2013. Results and discussion Samples were also collected from traditional fish landing centres (Lawson’s Bay, Pudimadaka, Bheemunipatnam) from Species of the genus Arothron Muller, 1841, five species, the landings by hook and line, shore seine, trammel net. The genus species of Canthigaster, Swainson, 1839, two species oceanic and pelagic specimens of Lagocephalus lagocephalus of genus Chelonodon Muller, 1839, 5 species of genus were collected from the deeper waters off Visakhapatnam Lagocephalus Swainson, 1839, one species of genus Takifugu, from surface waters beyond shelf zone and around 55 Abe, 1949, and one species of genus Torquigener, Whitley, nautical miles away from the shore. Only adult specimens 1930, are represented in the catches of Visakhapatnam (Table are represented in hook and line catches along with flying 1). Salient meristic data of all the fifteen species belonging to fish (Cheilopogan cyanopterus). Large sized specimens of five genera is given in (Table 2). L. lunaris and L. inermis were caught with hook and line at 40m to 90m depth region, sometimes even at 110 m depth Genus Arothron: Morphometric data of A. firmamentum, A. along with skipjack and yellowfin tuna. hispidus, A. immaculatus, A. reticularis and three different size groups of A. stellatus is given in (Table 3). PCA for Counts and measurements of specimens of this family were morphometric and meristic data of four closely related accounted following Dekkers (1975), Matsuura and Toda species A. hispidus, A. immaculatus, A. reticularis and (1981) and Tyler (1980). Pectoral rays count include uppermost A. stellatus was carried out. Based on PCA the following rudimentary ray. In these species, general form and shape of characters viz. body depth, preanal distance, dorsal base, the swim bladder and liver, scales, pelvis, spinules, lateral line anal base, dorsal length, anal length and eye diameter system, nasal organ structure are of diagnostic value. For the were considered significant. Results of Tukey test (p<0.05) first time, the swim bladder of each species is described. given in (Table 4). The Mean and Standard deviation relating to dorsal rays, anal Diagnostic characters of five species of genusArothron given rays, pectoral rays, gill rakers, head scale rows and body scale below: rows have been calculated from the data of pooled samples. Comparison of morphometric data of species belonging to the A. firmamentum (Temminck and Schlegel, 1850): Dorsally genera Arothron, Chelenodon, Lagocephalus, Takifugu and well separated spinules from interorbital region to origin of Torquigener are also made. Body measurements are recorded dorsal fin; interorbital convex (Fig. 1). as percent of standard length and measurements of the head region are recorded as percentage of head length, with the A. hispidus (Linnaeus, 1758): Spinules not well separated range of values separated by a hyphen and followed by the dorsally; dorsal spinules starts from norstrils to anterior half mean value and standard deviation (S.D.) of the measurement. of caudal peduncle; inter orbital broad, deeply concave; mean pre pectoral distance 42.18 % in standard length; mean pre Multivariate data analysis includes Principal Component orbital distance 45.39 %, mean eye diameter 14.68% in head Analysis (PCA) of all morphometric characters of the closely length. Swim bladder horse shoe shaped (Fig. 2). 96 Journal of the Marine Biological Association of India Vol. 57, No.2, Jul-Dec 2015 Taxonomy of Puffer fishes from Visakhapatnam coast Table 1. Systematic list of fishes of the family Tetraodontidae represented in the catches of Visakhapatnam n* Sex Length range (mm TL) Max length in Fishbase 2013 (mm TL) J F M Arothron Muller 1841 A. firmamentum (Temminck & Schlegel, 1850) 1 1 - - 152 440 A. hispidus (Linnaeus, 1758) 4 3 - 1 237-260 540 A. immaculatus (Bloch and Schneider, 1801) 60 26 31 3 120-375 300 A. reticularis (Bloch and Schneider, 1801) 5 - 4 1 325-590 540 A. stellatus (Bloch & Schneider, 1801) 19 13 4 2 79-570 1200 Canthigaster Swainson, 1839 C. solandri (Richardson, 1844) 4 4 - - 71-85 120 Chelonodon Muller, 1839 C. fluviatilis (Hamilton Buchanan, 1822) 3 3 75 - 33-110 170 C. patoca (Hamilton, 1822) 178 87 16 65-290 480 Lagocephalus Swainson, 1839 L. guentheri (Ribeiro, 1915) 95 39 40 16 80-360 260 L. inermis (Schlegel. 1850) 37 25 4 8 100-565 1060 L. lagocephalus (Linnaeus, 1758) 30 - 6 24 205-310 610 L. lunaris (Bloch & Schneider, 1801) 148 47 69 32 85-280 550 L. sceleratus (Forster, 1788) 38 38 - - 70-185 1330 Takifugu Abe, 1949 T. oblongus (Bloch, 1786) 141 67 32 42 155-340 400 Torquigener Whitley, 1930 T. hypselogeneion (Bleeker, 1852) 16 16 - - 60-130 100 *number of specimens for which meristic and morphometric data taken ; Underline represents maximum recorded size of the species Table 2. Salient meristic data of fifteen Tetraodontid species represented in the catches of Visakhapatnam Species n Dorsal Anal rays Caudal rays Pectoral rays Total gill rakers Genus Arothron A.firmamentum 1 14 13 10 21 - A.hispidus 4 -9(in one)-10 10 8-9 17,19 12 A.immaculatus 60 9-11 9-11 8-10 15-17 11 A.reticularis 5 10-11 10-11 10-11(in one) 17-18 9 A. stellatus 19 10-12 9-12 9-10 17-19 19 Genus Canthigaster C. solandri 4 9 9 10 16-17 Genus Chelenodon C. fluviatilis 3 14 12 11 22 C. patoca 178 9-10 8 8,10 14-17 7 Genus Lagocephalus L. guentheri 95 12 10-11 8,10 16-17 13 L. inermis 37 11-13 10-11 8-10 16-17 11 L. Lagocephalus 30 14-15 11-12 5,10 14-15 12 L. lunaris 148 11-12 10 8-9 14-15 11 L. sceleratus 38 10 8-10 8,10 13, 15-16(in one) (12-14) Genus Takifugu T.