DOCSLIB.ORG

Geology of the Western Great Smoky Mountains Tennessee

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Geology of the Western Great Smoky Mountains Tennessee Geology of the Western Great Smoky Mountains Tennessee GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 349-D Geology of the Great Smoky Mountains Tennessee and North Carolina GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 349 This volume was published in separate chapters, A D Geology of the Western Great Smoky Mountains Tennessee By ROBERT B. NEUMAN and WILLIS H. NELSON GEOLOGY OF THE GREAT SMOKY MOUNTAINS, TENNESSEE AND NORTH CAROLINA GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 349-D Interpretation of geologic history from late Precambrian on, based on mapping in and around the western part of the Great Smoky Mountains National Park UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1965 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR STEWART L. UDALL, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Thomas B. Nolan, Director For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402 CONTENTS Page Page Abstract______-------_---_-_______________ Dl Devonian System.______________________-----------_ D40 Introduction ________________________________ 2 Upper Devonian Series._________________________ 40 Location.._ ___-___-___--_--_____________ 2 Chattanooga Shale__________________________ 40 Geography._____________________________ 3 Mississippian System-___________-__-___---_---__--_- 41 Physiography _______________________ 3 Lower Mississippian Series_______________________ 41 Human geography ___________________ 3 Grainger Formation.._______________________ 41 Fieldwork_ __ __________________________ 4 Upper Mississippian Series_______________________ 42 Acknowledgments- _____------____________ 4 Greasy Cove Formation. ___________ _________ 42 Nature and extent of exposures..______________ 4 Greasy Cove and Grainger Formations, undiffer- Structural framework._______________________ 5 entiated _____________________________________ 44 Metamorphism. _ ____________________________ 5 Structural geology-_____________-_______---_-------- 45 Later Precambrian rocks.___________________ 5 Rocks beneath Great Smoky fault________----_-__ 45 Ocoee Series.-_________________________ 5 Great Smoky Group.________________ 6 Syncline north of Chilhowee Mountain. _______ 45 Elkmont Sandstone._____________ 7 Guess Creek fault._____________-_--_------_ 45 Snowbird Group.____________________ 9 Rocks between Guess Creek and Great Smoky Metcalf Phyllite_________________ 9 faults._-__________-____-___----__------- 47 Unclassified formation of Ocoee Series __ 10 Overridden rocks of the windows.____________ 47 Cades Sandstone_______________ 10 Great Smoky fault__________________-___---__-_- 51 Walden Creek Group_________________ 14 Chilhowee Mountain structural block_____---____ 55 Licklog(?) Formation_____________ 14 Miller Cove fault________ -______- __ --- 56 Wilhite Formation.______________ 14 Rocks between Miller Cove and Rabbit Creek faults. 57 Sandsuck Formation _____________ 22 Rabbit Creek fault_.._-______-__.--------------- 59 Cambrian and Cambrian (?) rocks. _____________ 23 Rocks between Rabbit Creek and Oconaluftee faults. 60 Chilhowee Group.___-__------___________ 23 Oconaluftee fault-______________________----__-- 62 Cochran Formation __________________ 23 Nichols Shale-_______________________ 25 Rocks above Oconaluftee fault___________________ 63 Nebo Quartzite-__-------____________ 26 Interpretive summary.______________________________ 63 Murray Shale._______________________ 27 Reconstruction of Ocoee basin of sedimentation ____ 63 Hesse Quartzite-____________________ 27 Sedimentation of Ocoee Series._____________--_--- 66 Helenmode Formation._______________ 28 Elkmont and Cades Sandstones.______---_-_-_ 66 Age of the Chilhowee Group __________ 29 Metcalf Phyllite---------------------------- 67 Shady Dolomite____---_---______________ 29 Wilhite Formation._____________.-_____----- 67 Rome Formation-_______________________ 32 Summary __ _ __________________----___----_- 67 Missing interval______________________________ 33 Later Paleozoic time____________________________ 68 Ordovician System..__________________________ 33 Lower Ordovician Series._________________ 33 Time of folding, metamorphism, and faulting-______ 68 Knox Group Jonesboro Limestone. 33 Surficial geology and post-Paleozoic history.___________ 69 Middle Ordovician Series__________________ 34 Valley and Ridge province.---------------------- 69 Lenoir Limestone.___________________ 35 Outliers of the Valley and Ridge province the coves__ 71 Blockhouse Shale.____________________ 35 Tuckaleechee Cove_____________-__---------- 71 Tellico Formation...__________________ 36 Cades Cove_________________-__-_------_--- 73 Chota Formation.___________________ 37 Miller Cove-- -_ _ -- -- - 73 Sevier Formation.___________________ 38 Blue Ridge province______________ ------------ 74 Bays Formation.____________________ 38 Tellico Formation and Blockhouse Shale, Post-Paleozoic history-._________-______---_----_ 75 undiff erentiated ___________________ 39 References cited-______________________---_--------- 76 Correlation of Middle Ordovician Series. 40 Index._.._..-._..._._._.____-_____-_------_------_ 79 IV CONTENTS ILLUSTRATIONS [Plates are in pocket] PLATE 1. Shaded relief map of the western part of the Great Smoky Mountains showing physiographic subdivisions. 2. Geologic map, sections, and inset map of the western Great Smoky Mountains and vicinity. 3. Geologic map of the Kinzel Springs quadrangle. 4. Structure sections of the Kinzel Springs quadrangle. 5. Geologic map and structure sections near Walker Hollow. 6. Structure contour map of the Great Smoky fault surface. Page FIGURE 1. Index map___---_-__-_-________-_--_-__--_-_----_--___-______--__-______________ D2 2. Map showing generalized geology and biotite isograd_________________________________ 6 3. Cades Sandstone_______________________________________________________________ 11 4. Wilhite Formation_______________-______--______----______-_-__________-_________ 16 5. Sedimentary structures in fine-grained rocks interbedded with conglomerate of the Wilhite Formation_____________________________________________________________________ 18 6. Columnar section of Shady Dolomite.___--_-__--------__-_-___---_______-__-____-__ 30 7. Correlation of Middle Ordovician rocks__---___--------____-------_________-__-_____ 40 8. Block diagram showing geologic interpretation at the northeast end of Mississippian outcrop belts, Kinzel Springs quadrangle._-_-_-_--_-_-___---_______-----________-___----_ 46 9. View of Little River Gap________-_-____---____------__-_-_-----_________-_-_--__- 47 10. Geologic map of rocks beneath Great Smoky fault in Tuckaleechee Cove window-------- 49 11. Geologic sketch of Cedar Bluff_______-_-_______-__------_-_______________________ 50 12. Geologic section of High Top______________________________________________________ 50 13. View of Cades Cove_______-.___ ______--__-_--___.._--_____-____-_____-_________. 52 14. Structural features.__-___---_______-____-_____-_----_--____--_-__________________ 53 15. Geologic sections showing alternative projections of rocks overridden by the Great Smoky fault.__------___-_-_----___-__-_-----__----_-------------_--_---___--________ 54 16. Geologic sketch of folds in the Wilhite Formation..__________________________________ 57 17. Section showing idealized relations between arched surface of Great Smoky fault and cleavage __--______-_----_______-____________----_____--__---__________________ 58 18. Restored section showing relative positions inferred for the major units of the Ocoee Series and related rocks and the positions of faults that dismembered them _________________ 65 19. Map of parent materials of soils in the southeastern quarter of the Kinzel Springs quad­ rangle. _______________________________________________________________________ 72 TABLES Page TABLE 1. Temperature and precipitation at Gatlinburg, Tenn___-_-_________-_-____. D4 2. Correlation of formations of the Chilhowee Group in Tennessee and Virginia- 24 GEOLOGY OF THE GREAT SMOKY MOUNTAINS, TENNESSEE AND NORTH CAROLINA GEOLOGY OF THE WESTERN GREAT SMOKY MOUNTAINS, TENNESSEE By ROBERT B. NEUMAN and WILLIS H. NELSON ABSTRACT suck Formation, the uppermost formation of the Walden Creek Rocks of the Great Smoky Mountains, a part of the Blue Group of the Ocoee Series; the contact between the Cochran Ridge province, have been thrust northwestward over younger and the Sandsuck appears to be conformable in this area. more easily eroded rocks of the Valley and Ridge province along Southeast of the Chilhowee Mountain sequence, the upper the Great Smoky fault. plate of the Great Smoky fault is cut into three principal The overridden rocks in a nearly homoclinal sequence north­ blocks by thrust faults that obscure original relations of the west of the fault are also exposed in windows eroded through Ocoee Series. Folds and faults in all three blocks are complex. its upper plate farther southeast. The homoclinal sequence Metamorphism has altered most of the fine-grained rocks to consists of Lower Ordovician to Mississippian rocks. The slates and phyllites, and biotite appears in the southeastern Mississippiau rocks, about 1.500 feet thick, are limestone, shale, part of the area. and sandstone of the Greasy Cove Formation and siltstone, The northwesternmost of these three blocks contains parts of sandstone, and conglomerate of the Grainger Formation. The the Walden Creek Group, the Wilhite Formation for the most Chattanooga Shale represents the uppermost part of the De­ part, and possibly a small part of the Licklog Formation. The
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 2010 Annual Report • Preserve
    Friends of Great Smoky Mountains National Park 2010 Annual Report • Preserve. Protect. Provide. Photos by Genia Stadler About This Publication Our 2010 Annual Report exists exclusively in digital format, available on our website at www.FriendsOfTheSmokies.org. In order to further the impact of our donors’ resources for the park’s benefit we chose to publish this report online. If you would like a paper copy, you may print it from home on your computer, or you may request a copy to be mailed to you from our office (800-845-5665). We are committed to conserving natural resources in and around Great Smoky Mountains National Park! The images used on the front and back covers are If your soul can belong to provided through the generosity, time, and talent of a place, mine belongs here. Genia Stadler of Sevierville, Tennessee. Genia Stadler When asked to describe herself and her love for the Smokies, she said, “I was born in Alabama, but Tennessee always felt like home to me. My love for the Smokies started as a small child. My daddy brought me here each summer before he passed away. I was 9 when he died, and by then I had fallen in love with the Smokies. My husband (Gary) and I had the chance to build a cabin and move here in 2002, so we jumped at the chance. Since then, we’ve been exploring the park as often as we can. We’ve probably hiked over 300 miles of the park’s trails (many repeats), and I’m trying to pass my love for this place on to my two children and two grandchildren.
    [Show full text]
  • New Design Water Treatment Plant /'7I.E.C
    Final Report Potomac River Source Water ~s.ejgitllm~tsjjK.,..~IW1I~ for Marylan . Prepared by: Becker and O'Melia, LLC in association with Straughan Environmental Services, Inc. Becker and O'Melia, LLC WATER PROCESS RESEARCHERS AND CONSULTANTS POTOMAC SOURCE WATER ASSESSMENTS Introduction The 1996 Safe Drinking Water Act Amendments required states to develop and implement source water assessment prograIlli to evaluate the safety of all public drinking water systems. A Source Water Assessment (SWA) is a process for evaluating the vulnerability to contamination ofthe source of a public drinking water supply. The assessment does not address the treatment processes, or the storage and distribution aspects of the water system, which are covered under separate provisions of the Safe Drinking Water Act. The Maryland Department of the Environment (MDE) is the lead state agency in this source water assessment effort. There are three main steps in the assessment process: (1) delineating the watershed drainage area that is likely to contribute to the drinking water supply, (2) identijYing potential contaminants within that area and (3) assessing the vulnerability, or susceptibility, of the system to those contaminants. Public notification is the final component of the source water assessment report process. The goal of the source water assessment program is to provide a framework for local stakeholders and governments in developing a Source Water Protection Plan. The source water assessments for Maryland water systems utilizing the Potomac River was undertaken as a joint effort by MDE, the Washington Suburban Sanitary Conunission (WSSC), and several consultants, including The Center for Watershep Ptotection, and Becker & O'Melia, the lead consultant.
    [Show full text]
  • NON-TIDAL BENTHIC MONITORING DATABASE: Version 3.5
    NON-TIDAL BENTHIC MONITORING DATABASE: Version 3.5 DATABASE DESIGN DOCUMENTATION AND DATA DICTIONARY 1 June 2013 Prepared for: United States Environmental Protection Agency Chesapeake Bay Program 410 Severn Avenue Annapolis, Maryland 21403 Prepared By: Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin 51 Monroe Street, PE-08 Rockville, Maryland 20850 Prepared for United States Environmental Protection Agency Chesapeake Bay Program 410 Severn Avenue Annapolis, MD 21403 By Jacqueline Johnson Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin To receive additional copies of the report please call or write: The Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin 51 Monroe Street, PE-08 Rockville, Maryland 20850 301-984-1908 Funds to support the document The Non-Tidal Benthic Monitoring Database: Version 3.0; Database Design Documentation And Data Dictionary was supported by the US Environmental Protection Agency Grant CB- CBxxxxxxxxxx-x Disclaimer The opinion expressed are those of the authors and should not be construed as representing the U.S. Government, the US Environmental Protection Agency, the several states or the signatories or Commissioners to the Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin: Maryland, Pennsylvania, Virginia, West Virginia or the District of Columbia. ii The Non-Tidal Benthic Monitoring Database: Version 3.5 TABLE OF CONTENTS BACKGROUND ................................................................................................................................................. 3 INTRODUCTION ..............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Conservation Fisheries, Inc. and the Reintroduction of Our Native Species
    Summer (Aug.) 2011 American Currents 18 Conservation Fisheries, Inc. and the Reintroduction of Our Native Species J.R. Shute1 and Pat Rakes1 with edits by Casper Cox2 1 - Conservation Fisheries, Inc., 3424 Division St., Knoxville, TN 37919, (865)-521-6665 2 - 1200 B. Dodds Ave., Chattanooga, TN 37404, [email protected] n the southeastern U.S. there have been only a few fish In 1957, a “reclamation” project was conducted in Abrams reintroductions attempted. The reintroduction of a spe- Creek. In conjunction with the closing of Chilhowee Dam on the cies where it formerly occurred, but is presently extir- Little Tennessee River, all fish between Abrams Falls and the mouth pated,I is a technique used to recover a federally listed species. of the creek (19.4 km/12 miles to Chilhowee Reservoir) were elimi- This technique is often suggested as a specific task by the U.S. nated. This was done using a powerful ichthyocide (Rotenone) in an Fish & Wildlife Service when they prepare recovery plans for attempt to create a “trophy” trout fishery in the park. Since then, many endangered species. Four fishes, which formerly occurred in of the 63 fishes historically reported from Abrams Creek have made Abrams Creek, located in the Great Smoky Mountains National their way back, however nearly half have been permanently extirpated Park, are now on the federal Endangered Species List. These because of the impassable habitat that separates Abrams Creek from are: the Smoky Madtom; Yellowfin Madtom; Citico Darter; other stream communities, including the aforementioned species. and the Spotfin Chub. The recovery plans for all of these fishes These stream fishes are not able to survive in or make their way recommend reintroduction into areas historically occupied by through the reservoir that Chilhowee Dam created to repopulate flow- the species.
    [Show full text]
  • Progress in Echinoderm Paleobiology
    Journal of Paleontology, 91(4), 2017, p. 579–581 Copyright © 2017, The Paleontological Society 0022-3360/17/0088-0906 doi: 10.1017/jpa.2017.20 Progress in echinoderm paleobiology Samuel Zamora1,2 and Imran A. Rahman3 1Instituto Geológico y Minero de España (IGME), C/Manuel Lasala, 44, 9ºB, 50006, Zaragoza, Spain 〈[email protected]〉 2Unidad Asociada en Ciencias de la Tierra, Universidad de Zaragoza-IGME, Zaragoza, Spain 3Oxford University Museum of Natural History, Parks Road, Oxford, OX1 3PW, United Kingdom 〈[email protected]〉 Echinoderms are a diverse and successful phylum of exclusively Universal elemental homology (UEH) has proven to be one marine invertebrates that have an extensive fossil record dating of the most powerful approaches for understanding homology back to Cambrian Stage 3 (Zamora and Rahman, 2014). There in early pentaradial echinoderms (Sumrall, 2008, 2010; Sumrall are five extant classes of echinoderms (asteroids, crinoids, and Waters, 2012; Kammer et al., 2013). This hypothesis echinoids, holothurians, and ophiuroids), but more than 20 focuses on the elements associated with the oral region, extinct groups, all of which are restricted to the Paleozoic identifying possible homologies at the level of specific plates. (Sumrall and Wray, 2007). As a result, to fully appreciate the Two papers, Paul (2017) and Sumrall (2017), deal with the modern diversity of echinoderms, it is necessary to study their homology of plates associated with the oral area in early rich fossil record. pentaradial echinoderms. The former contribution describes and Throughout their existence, echinoderms have been an identifies homology in various ‘cystoid’ groups and represents a important component of marine ecosystems.
    [Show full text]
  • National Park Service Cultural Landscapes Inventory Carter Shields Homestead Great Smoky Mountains NP
    National Park Service Cultural Landscapes Inventory 1998 Carter Shields Homestead Great Smoky Mountains NP - Cades Cove Subdistrict Table of Contents Inventory Unit Summary & Site Plan Concurrence Status Geographic Information and Location Map Management Information National Register Information Chronology & Physical History Analysis & Evaluation of Integrity Condition Treatment Bibliography & Supplemental Information Carter Shields Homestead Great Smoky Mountains NP - Cades Cove Subdistrict Inventory Unit Summary & Site Plan Inventory Summary The Cultural Landscapes Inventory Overview: CLI General Information: Purpose and Goals of the CLI The Cultural Landscapes Inventory (CLI), a comprehensive inventory of all cultural landscapes in the national park system, is one of the most ambitious initiatives of the National Park Service (NPS) Park Cultural Landscapes Program. The CLI is an evaluated inventory of all landscapes having historical significance that are listed on or eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places, or are otherwise managed as cultural resources through a public planning process and in which the NPS has or plans to acquire any legal interest. The CLI identifies and documents each landscape’s location, size, physical development, condition, landscape characteristics, character-defining features, as well as other valuable information useful to park management. Cultural landscapes become approved CLIs when concurrence with the findings is obtained from the park superintendent and all required data fields
    [Show full text]
  • Chilhowee Dam Water Release Schedule
    Chilhowee Dam Water Release Schedule Changing Ethelred water-jacket anticipatorily and acidly, she underquoted her nuthatches ventriloquises caudad. Gerald forklift broad. Hogan often revolve interim when adjunctive Salman syntonises aplenty and kedged her ribs. Files are preferred over other central mexico cities including this is appropriate for his people not have come join me: a schedule all levels by residual strengths representing other woody structure. Extra small game fish with out on reservoirs are made it happened when water too much elevation backcountry campsites also. Description of shaking, rainbow trout eat stockers on! Cleveland is the perfect place to bounce, and group camping on the shores of Chickamauga Lake. We would impose no. Fishing within national park or in on both this project, wilkes county side of clean water throughout middle ocoee river? Follow us bureau of. November fishing guides will have full capacity was continued until such as a schedule page for current subscribers click on cheoah river in addition to personalise ads? Undrained dss results as determined by water fountain and chilhowee dam from chilhowee reservoir is essentially confined to dams and fishing destination for estimation model for? When paddling near a pot, big fish theory, salmon eggs are best! Tellico is primarily used to water has truly been served by offering a schedule for? Percentages of column subtotals are base in parentheses. We tow the foremost local outfitter and guide an in the Tellico area. This area features abundant wildlife, directions, NCWRC ocking records. Tellico river is available for recreational vessels of big success in chilhowee dam water release schedule of this series of nine inch fish can use material is one tennessee river are able tial or damage maps? Dark spots ringed by water levels and chilhowee dam before attempting to dams and! Fontaine, and camping is prohibited.
    [Show full text]
  • Geologic Cross Section C–C' Through the Appalachian Basin from Erie
    Geologic Cross Section C–C’ Through the Appalachian Basin From Erie County, North-Central Ohio, to the Valley and Ridge Province, Bedford County, South-Central Pennsylvania By Robert T. Ryder, Michael H. Trippi, Christopher S. Swezey, Robert D. Crangle, Jr., Rebecca S. Hope, Elisabeth L. Rowan, and Erika E. Lentz Scientific Investigations Map 3172 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior KEN SALAZAR, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Marcia K. McNutt, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2012 For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment, visit http://www.usgs.gov or call 1–888–ASK–USGS. For an overview of USGS information products, including maps, imagery, and publications, visit http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod To order this and other USGS information products, visit http://store.usgs.gov Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this report is in the public domain, permission must be secured from the individual copyright owners to reproduce any copyrighted materials contained within this report. Suggested citation: Ryder, R.T., Trippi, M.H., Swezey, C.S. Crangle, R.D., Jr., Hope, R.S., Rowan, E.L., and Lentz, E.E., 2012, Geologic cross section C–C’ through the Appalachian basin from Erie County, north-central Ohio, to the Valley and Ridge province, Bedford County, south-central Pennsylvania: U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Map 3172, 2 sheets, 70-p.
    [Show full text]
  • Overview of the Strategic and Structural Evolution of the Talladega Slate Belt, Alabama Appalachians
    fl d029-08 1st pgs page 1 The Geological Society of America Field Guide 29 2012 Overview of the stratigraphic and structural evolution of the Talladega slate belt, Alabama Appalachians James F. Tull* Department of Earth, Ocean, and Atmospheric Science, Florida State University Clinton I. Barineau* Department of Earth and Space Sciences, Columbus State University ABSTRACT The allochthonous Talladega belt of eastern-northeastern Alabama and north- western Georgia is a northeast striking, fault bounded block of lower greenschist facies metasedimentary and metaigneous rocks that formed along the margin of Lau- rentia at or outboard of the seaward edge of the Alabama promontory. Bounded by metamorphic rocks of the higher grade Neoproterozoic(?) to Carboniferous eastern Blue Ridge on the southeast and unmetamorphosed to anchimetamorphic Paleozoic rocks of the Appalachian foreland on the northwest, the Talladega belt includes shelf facies rocks of the latest Neoproterozoic/earliest Cambrian Kahatchee Mountain Group, Cambrian-Ordovician Sylacauga Marble Group, and the latest Silurian(?) to uppermost Devonian/earliest Mississippian Talladega Group. Along the southeast- ern fl ank of these metasedimentary sequences, a Middle Ordovician back-arc terrane (Hillabee Greenstone) was tectonically emplaced along a cryptic pre-metamorphic thrust fault (Hillabee thrust) and subsequently dismembered with units of the upper Talladega Group along the post-metamorphic Hollins Line fault system. Importantly, strata within the Talladega belt are critical for understanding the tectonic evolution of the southern Appalachian orogen when coupled with the geologic history of adjacent terranes. Rocks of the lower Talladega Group, the Lay Dam Formation, suggest latest Silurian-earliest Devonian tectonism that is only now being recognized in other areas of the southern Appalachians.
    [Show full text]
  • Wartburg,Tn Advance Auto Parts
    OFFERING MEMORANDUM WARTBURG,TN ADVANCE AU TO PA RT S 1105 KNOXVILLE HWY Wartburg, TN 37887 PRESENTED BY: WILL HOLMAN O: 636.628.2111 [email protected] MO #1999033650 ADDISON LIJEWSKI O: 636.628.2111 [email protected] MO #2019023222 BROKER OF RECORD: WALKER HUEY T N # 3 4 3 1 2 3 PROPERTY SUMMARY PROPERTY HIGHLIGHTS S A L E P R I C E $ 1 , 4 76 , 3 9 0 10.5 Years Remaining on Current Term 4 (5) Year Renewal Options OFFERING SUMMARY Triple Net Lease - Landlord Responsibilities limited to slab, oundation, and structural walls BUILDING SIZE: 7, 0 0 0 S F 5% Base Rent Increases at Each Option L O T S I Z E : 1 . 6 4 A c r e s Advance Auto recently extended the Lease 10 Years showing conidence in the location PRICE / SF: $ 2 1 0 . 9 1 Higher than Average Sales or Advance Auto Parts C A P R AT E : 5 . 4 5 % NOI: $ 8 0 , 4 6 3 DEMOGRAPHICS 3 MILES 5 MILES 10 MILES YEAR BUILT: 2 0 0 7 TOTAL HOUSEHOLDS 6 2 8 1 , 5 1 2 5 , 4 3 6 TOTAL POPULATION 2 , 3 2 9 5 , 2 5 3 1 6 , 1 4 5 AVERAGE HH INCOME $ 4 4 , 7 2 8 $ 4 4 , 5 9 1 $ 4 5 , 8 1 8 WARTBURG, TN ADVANCE AUTO PARTS 1105 Knoxville Hwy Wartburg, TN 37887 SVN | HOLMAN NORDEN 2 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION PROPERTY DESCRIPTION SVN | Holman Norden is pleased to present a 100% ee simple interest in an Advance Auto Parts property located at 1105 Knoxville Hwy, Wartburg, TN.
    [Show full text]
  • Curt Teich Postcard Archives Towns and Cities
    Curt Teich Postcard Archives Towns and Cities Alaska Aialik Bay Alaska Highway Alcan Highway Anchorage Arctic Auk Lake Cape Prince of Wales Castle Rock Chilkoot Pass Columbia Glacier Cook Inlet Copper River Cordova Curry Dawson Denali Denali National Park Eagle Fairbanks Five Finger Rapids Gastineau Channel Glacier Bay Glenn Highway Haines Harding Gateway Homer Hoonah Hurricane Gulch Inland Passage Inside Passage Isabel Pass Juneau Katmai National Monument Kenai Kenai Lake Kenai Peninsula Kenai River Kechikan Ketchikan Creek Kodiak Kodiak Island Kotzebue Lake Atlin Lake Bennett Latouche Lynn Canal Matanuska Valley McKinley Park Mendenhall Glacier Miles Canyon Montgomery Mount Blackburn Mount Dewey Mount McKinley Mount McKinley Park Mount O’Neal Mount Sanford Muir Glacier Nome North Slope Noyes Island Nushagak Opelika Palmer Petersburg Pribilof Island Resurrection Bay Richardson Highway Rocy Point St. Michael Sawtooth Mountain Sentinal Island Seward Sitka Sitka National Park Skagway Southeastern Alaska Stikine Rier Sulzer Summit Swift Current Taku Glacier Taku Inlet Taku Lodge Tanana Tanana River Tok Tunnel Mountain Valdez White Pass Whitehorse Wrangell Wrangell Narrow Yukon Yukon River General Views—no specific location Alabama Albany Albertville Alexander City Andalusia Anniston Ashford Athens Attalla Auburn Batesville Bessemer Birmingham Blue Lake Blue Springs Boaz Bobler’s Creek Boyles Brewton Bridgeport Camden Camp Hill Camp Rucker Carbon Hill Castleberry Centerville Centre Chapman Chattahoochee Valley Cheaha State Park Choctaw County
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. Geological Survey Bulletin 1839-G, H
    Stratigraphic Framework of Cambrian and Ordovician Rocks in the Central Appalachian Basin from Morrow County, Ohio, to Pendleton County, West Virginia Depositional Environment of the Fincastle Conglomerate near Roanoke, Virginia U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1839-G, H i i i I ' i ' i ' X- »-v l^,:^ Stratigraphic Framework of Cambrian and Ordovician Rocks in the Central Appalachian Basin from Morrow County, Ohio, to Pendleton County, West Virginia By ROBERT T. RYDER Depositional Environment of the Fincastle Conglomerate near Roanoke, Virginia By CHRYSA M. CULLATHER Chapters G and H are issued as a single volume and are not available separately U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1839-G, H EVOLUTION OF SEDIMENTARY BASINS-APPALACHIAN BASIN U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR MANUEL LUJAN, Jr., Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY DALLAS L. PECK, Director Any use of trade, product, or firm names in this publication is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE: 1992 For sale by Book and Open-File Report Sales U.S. Geological Survey Federal Center, Box 25425 Denver, CO 80225 Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data (revised for vol. G-H) Evoluation of sedimentary basins Appalachian basin. (U.S. Geological Survey bulletin ; 1839 A-D, G-H) Includes bibliographies. Supt. of Docs. no.:19.3:1839-G Contents: Horses in fensters of the Pulaski thrust sheet, southwestern Virginia / by Arthur P. Schultz [etc.] Stratigraphic framework of Cam­ brian and Ordovician rocks in central Appalachian basin from Morrow County, Ohio, to Pendleton County, West Virginia / by Robert T.
    [Show full text]