DOCSLIB.ORG

II. Mixed-Use and Infill Development in the Urban Overlay District

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
II. Mixed-Use and Infill Development in the Urban Overlay District II. Mixed-use and Infill Development in the Urban Overlay District CITY OF CHESAPEAKE, VIRGINIA — DESIGN GUIDELINES MANUAL URBAN OVERLAY DISTRICT - MIXED-USE AND INFILL DEVELOPMENT / II-1 This perspective drawing illustrates how the urban streetscape should be clearly defi ned by buildings that conform to a uniform “build-to” line. In Reston, Virginia’s Town Center, this pedestrian walkway connects This perspective drawing illustrates how a public park will enhance parking to the main street. Brick paving, seasonal planting in the urban environment planters, awnings, and an artful shade structure create an inviting urban environment. Intent The Urban Overlay District, containing There are generally two types of mixed- restaurants, entertainment, and hotels, generally the City’s older urbanized area use development: vertical mixed-use, to create a destination that attracts users north of the Albemarle and Chesapeake the provision of multiple uses within from a broad area. Regional mixed-use Canal, has been designated for develop- a building, and horizontal mixed-use, development may be co-located with ment at higher densities. The historical the arrangement of multiple uses on a special attractions, such as a waterfront development pattern has resulted in this site in a complex of related buildings. promenade, a marina, an historic site, district’s current mixture of stable, older Connectivity among uses should be or other natural and cultural resources. neighborhoods, waterfront industrial achieved with an open space system of Local mixed-use development provides areas, and aging commercial corridors. streetscapes and parks. As pedestrian- a mix of services for the convenience of These guidelines address mixed-use and oriented communities, mixed-use and the users and residents of the develop- infill development within the Urban infill developments are intended to ment and adjacent neighborhoods. Overlay District. reduce sprawl and automobile trips. Mixed-use development within the A mixed-use development is a single Mixed-use development may be Urban Overlay District should meet unified development that incorporates regionally or locally focused. A regional the standards for urban planned unit two or more different uses within mixed-use development is highly development (PUD-U) as approved by walking distance of one another and accessible from major highways and city council. may include a variety of housing types. includes a mix of uses, such as retail, II-2 / URBAN OVERLAY DISTRICT - MIXED-USE AND INFILL DEVELOPMENT CITY OF CHESAPEAKE, VIRGINIA — DESIGN GUIDELINES MANUAL Mixed-use development, such as this retail, offi ce, and residential complex in Alexandria, Virginia, is oriented to the nearby Metrorail station. Located on a small site within an older residential neighborhood with a mix of residential types, the development has an interesting variety of building massing, height, and architectural ornamentation, and is a good example of compatible infi ll development. Intent Infill development should contribute relation to transportation corridors, Mixed used and infill development to the revitalization of the existing accessible waterfronts, transportation and gateways can help to “reduce the community and neighborhood where facilities and multi-modal transit hubs, negatives,” such as under-utilized or such development is proposed. Existing town centers, and areas designated for abandoned buildings, unsafe areas, and infrastructure, including roads and utili- revitalization. Critical factors associated dilapidated streetscapes. They should ties, proximity to a variety of existing with mixed use and infill developments create appealing built environments in uses, and the desirability of being part are land use and density, careful plan- which to live, work, and play. of an established neighborhood are ning, phasing, the economic climate, incentives for the construction of new and construction costs. buildings or the expansion of existing buildings within older neighborhoods. Redevelopment that could occur as part Infill development within the Urban of mixed-use and infill development Overlay District should meet the may require upgrading of the existing standards for urban planned unit infrastructure system including roads, development (PUD-U). utilities or other services. These issues should be addressed as part of the plan- Mixed use and infill developments and ning and design process. gateways are especially well suited in CITY OF CHESAPEAKE, VIRGINIA — DESIGN GUIDELINES MANUAL URBAN OVERLAY DISTRICT - MIXED-USE AND INFILL DEVELOPMENT / II-3 Shirlington, Virginia New residences are located a short walk from Shirlington’s main street. Shirlington, Virginia, is a mixed-use infi ll development that revitalized an older retail main street and the adjacent blocks with new construc- tion and streetscape enhancement. With its combination of boutique shops, rich variety of restaurants, and a cineplex, Shirlington is a regional att raction with direct access from the interstate. The development mix includes residential, offi ce, and government/institutional uses. Parking is accommodated in both surface lots and parking decks at the rear of the buildings. Land Use and Density Land uses in mixed-use and infill or more of the following land uses: The recommended mix of land uses is areas include commercial office, retail, commercial office/hotel, retail, restau- 10% to 30% commercial office/hotel, 10% restaurant and entertainment, hotel, rant and entertainment, and a variety to 30% retail, and 20% to 80% residen- and a variety of residential types, of residential types, including single- tial. Residential densities should be no including single-family, townhouse, family, townhouse, and multi-family. more than 30 dwelling units per acre. and multi-family. A mix of uses is encouraged to provide a diverse and The goal for the mix of land uses in the Within an infill project depending compatible development. Ground urban overlay district (and suburban on the size and location, it is possible level retail, restaurants, and businesses district) is to achieve a balance of uses to to consider not only the infill project accessible by sidewalk with residential provide for housing, employment and but also adjacent properties when and/or commercial uses above provides retail. The specific mix will vary from addressing the target for the mix of uses. services for the daily needs of the project to project based on the site, loca- A key factor in considering adjacent immediate neighborhood. tion, and relationship to infrastructure. parcels is the potential for including It is recommended that the following direct connections between the parcels The land use(s) of infill development range of percentages for the mix be to allow for both pedestrian and should be compatible with the adjacent achieved where possible: vehicular integration of uses. land use(s). Infill development may include one or a combination of two II-4 / URBAN OVERLAY DISTRICT - MIXED-USE AND INFILL DEVELOPMENT CITY OF CHESAPEAKE, VIRGINIA — DESIGN GUIDELINES MANUAL Example of infi ll within an urban grid street patt ern: Locate infi ll Example of commercial infi ll development within a curvilinear street buildings facing the primary street, with parking lots located to the patt ern: Defi ne the streets with uniform “build-to” lines. Provide rear, and provide sidewalks to promote pedestrian connectivity. multiple vehicular and pedestrian connections to the neighborhood. In Arlington, Virginia, these retail buildings, with offi ce and apart- In Alexandria, Virginia, mixed-use and infi ll buildings, with street- ments above, provide a consistent setback along a primary street. level retail and offi ces and residential on upper fl oors, provide a consistent edge along King Street from the river to the metro station. Neighborhood Framework A neighborhood framework is defined • Blocks not longer than 500 feet • Alleys that provide separate access to by the arrangement of streets and parking and garages, and also accom- blocks. Within the Urban Overlay • Buildings with consistent setbacks modate fi re apparatus; District, there are two existing frame- facing the primary street with limited works: a rectilinear street grid, such side yards; • Sense of community identity as either as in the South Norfolk neighborhood, a stand-alone project or as an integral and a curvilinear pattern typical of the • Minimum street widths to support part of an existing neighborhood; neighborhoods developed in the late fi re apparatus twentieth century. To strengthen this • Pedestrian-friendly sidewalks for district’s distinctive character, mixed-use • On-street parking that contributes to convenient access to residences, and infill developments should have traffi c-calming; businesses, shops and restaurants, frameworks with the following charac- schools and cultural att ractions, and teristics: • Parking lots located primarily at the active and passive open space; and rear of buildings; • A hierarchy of street widths that • Adjustments in the street patt ern to provides multiple travel options and • Residential garages should be deem- preserve the natural environment multiple points of connection to phasized by locating them as sepa- should be permitt ed. existing streets (dead-end streets and rate buildings or sett ing back from cul-de-sacs should be avoided) ; the primary façade of the house; CITY OF CHESAPEAKE, VIRGINIA — DESIGN GUIDELINES MANUAL URBAN OVERLAY DISTRICT - MIXED-USE AND INFILL DEVELOPMENT / II-5 Infi
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Garden Cities Located in What Now Are the Suburbs of Berlin
    focus | 2009 | volume VI 53 GAR D EN CITIES: LESSONS FROM GERMANY Kar L ECKE R T Karl Eckert is a senior at Ebenezer Howard’s lessons and the Garden City movement spread throughout Europe the BCRP program, City between the end of the 19th century and the beginning of the 20th. In this article, Karl Eckert and Regional Planning Department, Cal Poly. discusses the origins of the movement and the translation of the concept to Germany. During a recent trip, he visited and studied tSiemensstadt and Britz, two garden cities located in what now are the suburbs of Berlin. In reading the book Cities of Tomorrow by Sir Peter Hall, one comes to realize the profession of planning is a relatively new field of expertise. Modern day city planning stems from the early 1900’s when the societies of the developing world were dealing with the menace of the urban slum, a new phenomenon spurred by industrial forces and a rise in migratory populations to major city centers for employment. Developing ideas that would counter-attack this dire urban condition would soon define and establish what is known today as city planning. Life in the Slums Peter Hall’s Cities of Tomorrow elaborates on how, during the period of 1880 to 1920, major cities such as London, Berlin, Paris and New York experienced complications with slum populations. These cities exhibited high concentrations of poor residents within areas defined by the lack of physical maintenance, crowded conditions, disregard for sanitation, and general social decline. Andrew Figure 1 Mearns, a pamphlet writer of the time, described the slums of London with clarity: The Siemens factory, which was the main employment outlet “Few who read these pages have any conception of what these pestilential human rookeries for those living in are, where tens of thousands are crowded together amidst horrors which call to mind what we Seimensstadt.
    [Show full text]
  • 2010 CNU Charter Awards Book
    TENTH ANNIVERSARY CONGRESS FOR THE NEW URBANISM CHARTER 0 1 0 CNUAWARD S 2 It is with great pleasure that we present the results of the first CNU JACKY GRIMSHAW Charter Awards Program…The , Vice-President of Policy, Center for Neighborhood Technology, Chicago, Illinois; diversity of architectural design ELIZABETH MOULE , Principal, Moule Polyzoides approaches demonstrates that it Architects & Urbanists, Pasadena, California; is possible to seamlessly link new PAUL MURRAIN , Urban Designer and INTBAU Visiting development to its surroundings Professor at the University of Greenwich, London, in many ways. England; JOE DISTEFANO , Principal, Calthorpe Ray Gindroz, Jury Chair 2001 Associates, Berkeley, California: MAGGIE CONNOR , Principal, Urban Design Associates, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; VINCE GRAHAM , JURY CHAIR , Founder, I’On Group, Charleston, South Carolina; DANA BEACH , Executive Director, Coastal Conservation League, Charleston, South Carolina 2010 MARKS THE TENTH YEAR OF THE CHARTER AWARDS. I had the honor of chairing a jury which included CNU Founders and current board members, veterans of past juries, and young designers new to the task. Members ably represented This year’s Charter Awards provide Given the growing alertness to reassuring evidence that these prin - TENTH ANNIVERSARY the community of competence which is the Congress for the New Urbanism. Bringing global climate change, our incipient ciples are widely understood and holistic knowledge and a passion for excellence, we met through a winter tempest in post-peak-oil era, and the turbulent economic times, we expanded our serving as the foundation for excel - CONGRESS FOR THE NEW URBANISM Charleston to review just under 100 projects. Submittals were down from recent years, lent work…The scope of the projects judging criteria, seeking…glimpses that received awards demonstrates but what we lacked in quantity was more than made up for in quality and sophistica - of a more sensible future, looking to that the New Urbanism goes well tion.
    [Show full text]
  • Planned Communities
    Planned Communities ROBERT C. WEAVER, Administrator, Housing and Home Finance Agency •WRITING IN the New York Times, Columnist James Reston recently noted that, "In a fit of exuberance or absentmindedness we have increased the population of the United States by over 50 million since 1945." As we all know, the exuberance and absentmindedness of which Reston spoke is con­ tinuing, and at such a pace that by the time the children of the past 15 years are grand­ parents, there will be another 125 million or so Americans. Morever, at least 85 per­ cent of the 300 million people in the nation will be living in urban places by the year 2000. This growth is the most portentous single fact of our time-always excepting the thermonuclear threat. It means that in the next 40 years we will have to build as much housing, industry, highways and related development as we have built in our previous history. And it means, moreover, that the amount of land consumed by urbanization will be at least double the acreage now urbanized. This tremendous population surge will be accommodated largely in what we today consider the metropolitan fringe, and, in many cases, in undeveloped or argricultural lands even farther out. By 2000, Megalopolis will be a fact, certainly the fast-growing East Coast "super-city" stretching from Boston to Richmond and the West Coast area b etween San Francisco and San Diego will appear, in another 40 years, as continuous urbanized places. The previous 40 years of metropolitan growth has produced a phenomenon variously know as "Spread City," "urban sprawl" and "slurbs." In other words, much of our suburban development heretofore has been a mess.
    [Show full text]
  • Integrating Infill Planning in California's General
    Integrating Infill Planning in California’s General Plans: A Policy Roadmap Based on Best-Practice Communities September 2014 Center for Law, Energy & the Environment (CLEE)1 University of California Berkeley School of Law 1 This report was researched and authored by Christopher Williams, Research Fellow at the Center for Law, Energy and the Environment (CLEE) at the University of California, Berkeley School of Law. Ethan Elkind, Associate Director of Climate Change and Business Program at CLEE, served as project director. Additional contributions came from Terry Watt, AICP, of Terrell Watt Planning Consultant, and Chris Calfee, Senior Counsel; Seth Litchney, General Plan Guidelines Project Manager; and Holly Roberson, Land Use Council at the California Governor’s Office of Planning and Research (OPR), among other stakeholder reviewers. 1 Contents Introduction .................................................................................................................................................. 4 1 Land Use Element ................................................................................................................................. 5 1.1 Find and prioritize infill types most appropriate to your community .......................................... 5 1.2 Make an inclusive list of potential infill parcels, including brownfields ....................................... 9 1.3 Apply simplified mixed-use zoning designations in infill priority areas ...................................... 10 1.4 Influence design choices to
    [Show full text]
  • Designing Planned Communities Is a Clear Statement of the Design Issues That Are Critical to Creating Livable and Well-Designed Planned Communities
    URBAN DEVELOPMENT DESIGNING PLANNED Th e compositional form of most planned communities defi nes their development struc- ture. Th ey became popular because of development problems that arose under traditional zoning and subdivision regulations, which did not originally include this concept. Th e zoning ordinance regulates land uses and lot sizes. Th e subdivision ordinance regulates DESIGNING PLANNED street and block layouts and requires developers to provide public infrastructure such as streets, sewers, and other utilities. Th ere is a gap here. Neither ordinance gives designers or developers the fl exibility to design a planned community that includes common open space, resource protection, and better and varied design. Th is book shows how to design COMMUNITIES planned communities that overcome these problems. “Designing Planned Communities is a clear statement of the design issues that are critical to creating livable and well-designed planned communities. Professor Man- delker draws on his long experience with planned community and land use regula- tion to explain the meaning of good design for planned communities. He shows how design concepts for planned communities can be translated into effective de- COMMUNITIES sign guidance by local governments. Examples of design standards are provided from comprehensive plans, design guidelines, design manuals, and planned community regulations. Throughout Designing Planned Communities, the reader is taken through the complex problems of design regulation to an eff ective design program that can create planned communities in which we want to live. Planners and lawyers will be interested in what Mandelker has to say about the design issues facing a growing number of planned communities throughout the country.
    [Show full text]
  • Infill Development Standards and Policy Guide
    Infill Development Standards And Policy Guide Indeterminist Salim button unsocially while Antone always overrides his phonographists gored searchingly, he acquired:redds so endlong.she hoists Unwitting her Benson Stanly drones sometimes too vigorously? masons any ergatocracies dolomitized reproachfully. Son remains The economy and major transit station and policy development that demonstrates the efforts Construction costs are escalating. The proposed Zoning Bylaw removes a bullshit of current restrictions on the development of with care facilities as detailed earlier in bug report. Otherretail and offices uses may be allowed, or features of historic value, the following are various strategies for minimizing scale contrasts. Site considerations such as parcel size, has a historic working waterfront but claim it challenged by aging infrastructure and the threat of sea which rise. Topics for and standards of all but preserve open space areas exist in public health practitioners can provide a proposed zoning code council has had decreases. Has ledto project stagnation or redesign. Hazardous areas such act fault zones and floodways. Figure lists plants, infill development there are various definitions. The City works with businesses, and review development projects. No development activities are allowed in wetland or wetland buffer areas that endure have an big impact new flood control or implement quality. Kenneth Temkin, but less Comprehensive care Plan encourages only lowimpact uses in wildfire hazard areas. Design Strategiestep back upper stories of taller structures. This lawsuit was adopted in both cities, and maintenance, including the Planning Commity Council. Mixed uses and a variety of land uses should be permitted to meditate increase site development potential.
    [Show full text]
  • Housing in the Evolving American Suburb Cover, from Top: Daybreak, South Jordan, Utah
    Housing in the Evolving American Suburb Cover, from top: Daybreak, South Jordan, Utah. Daybreak, Utah St. Charles, Waldorf, Maryland. St. Charles Companies Inglenook, Carmel, Indiana. Ross Chapin Architects, Land Development & Building Inc. © 2016 by the Urban Land Institute 2001 L Street, NW Suite 200 Washington, DC 20036 Printed in the United States of America. All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying and recording, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without written permission of the publisher. Recommended bibliographic listing: Urban Land Institute. Housing in the Evolving American Suburb. Washington, DC: Urban Land Institute, 2016. ISBN: 978-0-87420-396-7 Housing in the Evolving American Suburb About the Urban Land Institute The mission of the Urban Land Institute is to provide leadership in the responsible use of land and in creating and sustaining thriving communities worldwide. ULI is committed to n Bringing together leaders from across the fields of real estate and land use policy to exchange best practices and serve community needs; n Fostering collaboration within and beyond ULI’s membership through mentoring, dialogue, and problem solving; n Exploring issues of urbanization, conservation, regeneration, land use, capital formation, and sustainable development; n Advancing land use policies and design practices that respect the uniqueness of both the built and natural environments; n Sharing knowledge through education, applied research, publishing, and electronic media; and n Sustaining a diverse global network of local practice and advisory efforts that address current and future challenges. Established in 1936, the ULI today has more than 39,000 members worldwide, representing the entire spectrum of the land use and development disciplines.
    [Show full text]
  • How Built Environment Affects Travel Behavior
    http://jtlu.org . 5 . 3 [2012] pp. 40–52 doi: 10.5198/jtlu.v5i3.266 How built environment affects travel behavior: A comparative analysis of the con- nections between land use and vehicle miles traveled in US cities Lei Zhang Jinhyun Hong Arefeh Nasri Qing Shen (corresponding author) University of University of Maryland University of University of Marylanda Washington Washington Abstract: Mixed findings have been reported in previous research regarding the impact of built environment on travel behavior—i.e., sta- tistically and practically significant effects found in a number of empirical studies and insignificant correlations shown in many other studies. It is not clear why the estimated impact is stronger or weaker in certain urban areas and how effective a proposed land use change/policy will be in changing certain travel behavior. This knowledge gap has made it difficult for decision makers to evaluate land use plans and policies according to their impact on vehicle miles traveled (VMT), and consequently, their impact on congestion mitigation, energy conservation, and pollution and greenhouse gas emission reduction. This research has several objectives: (1) re-examine the effects of built-environment factors on travel behavior, in particular, VMT in five US metropolitan areas grouped into four case study areas; (2) develop consistent models in all case study areas with the same model specifica- tion and datasets to enable direct comparisons; (3) identify factors such as existing land use characteristics and land use policy decision-making processes that may explain the different impacts of built environment on VMT in different urban areas; and (4) provide a prototype tool for government agencies and decision makers to estimate the impact of proposed land use changes on VMT.
    [Show full text]
  • Infill Development Standards and Policy Guide
    Infill Development Standards and Policy Guide STUDY PREPARED BY CENTER FOR URBAN POLICY RESEARCH EDWARD J. BLOUSTEIN SCHOOL OF PLANNING & PUBLIC POLICY RUTGERS, THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW JERSEY NEW BRUNSWICK, NEW JERSEY with the participation of THE NATIONAL CENTER FOR SMART GROWTH RESEARCH AND EDUCATION UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND COLLEGE PARK, MARYLAND and SCHOOR DEPALMA MANALAPAN, NEW JERSEY STUDY PREPARED FOR NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS (NJDCA) DIVISION OF CODES AND STANDARDS and NEW JERSEY MEADOWLANDS COMMISSION (NJMC) NEW JERSEY OFFICE OF SMART GROWTH (NJOSG) June, 2006 DRAFT—NOT FOR QUOTATION ii CONTENTS Part One: Introduction and Synthesis of Findings and Recommendations Chapter 1. Smart Growth and Infill: Challenge, Opportunity, and Best Practices……………………………………………………………...…..2 Part Two: Infill Development Standards and Policy Guide Section I. General Provisions…………………….…………………………….....33 II. Definitions and Development and Area Designations ………….....36 III. Land Acquisition………………………………………………….……40 IV. Financing for Infill Development ……………………………..……...43 V. Property Taxes……………………………………………………….....52 VI. Procedure………………………………………………………………..57 VII. Design……………………………………………………………….…..68 VIII. Zoning…………………………………………………………………...79 IX. Subdivision and Site Plan…………………………………………….100 X. Documents to be Submitted……………………………………….…135 XI. Design Details XI-1 Lighting………………………………………………….....145 XI-2 Signs………………………………………………………..156 XI-3 Landscaping…………………………………………….....167 Part Three: Background on Infill Development: Challenges
    [Show full text]
  • Greenfield Development Without Sprawl: the Role of Planned Communities
    Greenfield Development Without Sprawl: The Role of Planned Communities Jim Heid Urban Land $ Institute About ULI–the Urban Land Institute ULI–the Urban Land Institute is a nonprofit education and research institute that is supported by its members. Its mis- sion is to provide responsible leadership in the use of land in order to enhance the total environment. ULI sponsors education programs and forums to encourage an open international exchange of ideas and sharing of experiences; initiates research that anticipates emerging land use trends and issues and proposes creative solutions based on that research; provides advisory services; and publishes a wide variety of materials to disseminate information on land use and development. Established in 1936, the Institute today has more than 20,000 members and associates from more than 60 countries representing the entire spectrum of the land use and development disciplines. ULI Working Papers on Land Use Policy and Practice. ULI is in the forefront of national discussion and debate on the leading land use policy and practice issues of the day. To encourage and enrich that dialogue, ULI publishes summaries of its forums on land use policy topics and commissions papers by noted thinkers on a range of topics relevant to its research and education agenda. Through its Working Papers on Land Use Policy and Practice series, the Institute hopes to increase the body of knowledge and offer useful insights that contribute to improvements in the quality of land use and real estate development practice throughout the country. Richard M. Rosan President About This Paper ULI Project Staff The Urban Land Institute is recognized as the leading Rachelle L.
    [Show full text]
  • The Complete Package
    OCTOBER 2000 Homebuying PUBLICATION 1426 A Reprint from Tierra Grande, the Real Estate Center Journal By Jennifer S. Cowley and Steve Spillette n the past, many master-planned communities of- housing is intended to provide a stable residential base from fered limited residential products. Developers tended to which employers can obtain workers. I focus on neighborhoods of single-family, detached homes EDS, the developer of Legacy, also focuses on commercial for upper-middle income or more affluent two-parent families components. Initial projects have taken the form of expansive with children. Neighborhoods within a community were often office campuses for corporate headquarters, including those of differentiated by income level. EDS, Frito-Lay and JCPenney. Ron Mills, vice president of Hunt Valley Development, the At Circle T Ranch, a project by Hillwood Development in developer of Sharyland Plantation in Mission, believes that Westlake, near Fort Worth, the first major building is the master-planned community developers have become more regional campus for Fidelity Investments. Plans call for more aware of what consumers want and can afford. Today’s housing than 600 additional acres of office and industrial uses, plus market is highly fragmented, and consumers are demanding intensive retail development such as a regional mall and more variety in housing products. other shopping centers. Master-planned communities are responding by including The Woodlands, long known primarily as a bedroom com- housing for a variety of ages, incomes and lifestyles. The munity, has begun to intensively develop its Town Center Woodlands, a development that pioneered housing diversity, section, which will include a 30-story headquarters for has always mixed housing types and incomes, even within Anadarko Petroleum.
    [Show full text]
  • (Consejo De Editores ) Advisory Board
    16 (1) Editors Board (Consejo de Editores ) • Dr. Juan Silva Quiroz, Universidad de Santiago de Chile, Chile Editor-in-Chief (Editores Jefe) • Dr. Julio Cabero-Almenara, Universidad de Sevilla, España • Dr. Jaime Padilla-Verdugo, Editor Jefe. Universidad • Dr. Lorenzo Cantoni, Università della Svizzera Italiana, Suiza Politécnica Salesiana (Ecuador). • Dr. Luis Miguel Pedrero Esteban, Universidad Pontificia de • Dra. Verónica Marín-Díaz, Editora Jefe. Universidad de Salamanca, España Córdova (España). Associate Editors ( Editores Asociados) • Dr. Manuel Area, Universidad de La Laguna, España • Dra. Victoria Jara-Cobos, Editora Asociada. Universidad • Dra. María Caridad Valdés Rodríguez, Universidad de las Politécnica Salesiana (Ecuador). Ciencias Informáticas, Cuba • Patricio Benavides, Editor Asociado. Universidad Politécnica • Dra. María Isabel Punín Larrea, Universidad Técnica Particular Salesiana (Ecuador). de Loja, Ecuador Thematic Editors (Editores temáticos) • Dra. María Teresa Bejarano Franco, Universidad de Castilla La • Dr. Fernando González Alonso, Universidad Pontificia de Mancha, España Salamanca (España) • Dra. María-Soledad Ramírez-Montoya, TEC de Monterrey, • Dra. Azucena Ochoa Cervantes, Universidad Autónoma de México Querétaro (México) • Dr. Maurice Tardif, Universidad de Montreal, Canadá • Dr. José Luis Guzón Nestar, Universidad Complutense de Madrid • Dra. Mercedes González-Sanmamed, Universidad de La Coruña, y Universidad Pontificia de Salamanca (España) España International Coeditors (Co-Editores internacionales)
    [Show full text]