DOCSLIB.ORG

Alternative Livelihoods and Sustainable Resource Management

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Alternative Livelihoods and Sustainable Resource Management Alternative livelihoods and sustainable resource management ISBN-10: 90-5113-083X ISBN-13: 978-90-5113-083-6 © 2005 Tropenbos International The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors and the participants and do not necessarily reflect the views of Tropenbos International. No part of this publication, apart from bibliographic data and brief quotations in critical reviews, may be reproduced, re-recorded or published in any form including print photocopy, microform, electronic or electromagnetic record without written permission. Citation: Tropenbos International (2005). Alternative Livelihoods and Sustainable Resource Management. Proceedings of a workshop held in Akyawkrom, Ghana, on the 1st of April 2005. Tropenbos International Ghana Workshop Proceedings 4, edited by D. K. B. Inkoom, K. Okae Kissiedu and B. Owusu Jnr. Wageningen, the Netherlands. Cover photos: 1. Women gathering charcoal with children (photographer unknown) 2. Pastor Oppong's grasscutters taking a bite (B. Owusu Jnr.) 3. Woman displaying 10000 cedis worth of mushrooms (B. Owusu Jnr.) 4. Strings of beads on display in bead factory at Krobo Odumase (B. Owusu Jnr.) ALTERNATIVE LIVELIHOODS AND SUSTAINABLE RESOURCE MANAGEMENT Editors: D. K. B. Inkoom, K. Okae Kissiedu and B. Owusu Jnr. Tropenbos International Wageningen, the Netherlands 2005 Alternative livelihoods and sustainable resource management TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS ..............................................................................................................................I ACRONYMS ............................................................................................................................................... II PREFACE ...................................................................................................................................................III ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ....................................................................................................................... IV SYNTHESIS, SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS...................................................................................V 1. INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................................1 1.1 BACKGROUND............................................................................................................................1 1.2 WORKSHOP OBJECTIVE ...................................................................................................................1 1.3 WORKSHOP METHODS.....................................................................................................................2 1.4 ORGANISATION OF THE REPORT......................................................................................................2 2. OPENING SESSION .......................................................................................................................3 2.1 WELCOME ADDRESS ................................................................................................................3 2.2 KEYNOTE ADDRESS..................................................................................................................5 3. PRESENTATIONS ..........................................................................................................................8 3.1 FOREST RESOURCES AND SUSTAINABLE RURAL LIVELIHOODS ..................................8 3.2 PROMOTING ALTERNATIVE LIVELIHOODS: FIELD EXPERIENCES..............................17 3.3 PROMOTING ALTENATIVE LIVLIHOOD: FIELD EXPERIENCE. ......................................27 3.4 HOW VIABLE ARE THE ALTERNATIVES? ...........................................................................31 3.5 ALTERNATIVE LIVELIHOOD SCHEMES IN FOREST DISTRICTS OF GHANA...............44 4. GROUP DISCUSSIONS................................................................................................................63 5. CHAIRMAN’S CLOSING REMARKS.......................................................................................64 APPENDICES .............................................................................................................................................65 APPENDIX I: PROGRAMME FOR THE FOCUS GROUP DISCUSSIONS ...................................65 APPENDIX II: LIST OF PARTICIPANTS.........................................................................................66 APPENDIX III: OUTCOME OF GROUP DISCUSSIONS..................................................................68 APPENDIX IV: DEFINITION OF KEY CONCEPTS .........................................................................71 __________________________________________________________________________________________________ i Alternative livelihoods and sustainable resource management ACRONYMS AfDB African Development Bank ALs Alternative Livelihoods AIDEP African Institute for Economic Development andPlanning (RC presentation) BARFGA Brong Ahafo Regional Grasscutter Farmers’ Association CEDEP Centre for the Development of People CBUD Centre for Biodiversity Utilisation and Development CLF Community Livelihood Facilitators DFID Department For International Development DED German Development Service FAGE Federation of Associations of Ghana Exporters FRNR Faculty of Renewable Natural Resources FORIG Forestry Research Institute of Ghana FRCP Forest Resources Creation Project FSD Forestry Services Division GSBA Globally Significant Biodiversity Area GDP Gross Domestic Project GTZ German Technical Cooperation Agency KNRMP Kumasi Natural Resource Management Project KNUST Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology LPG Liquefied Petroleum Gas MDGs Millennium Development Goals MOAP Market-Oriented Agricultural Programme MoFA Ministry of Food and Agriculture NGO Non-Governmental Organisation NRMP Natural Resources Management Project NTFPs Non-Timber Forest Products OCAP Oda-Kotamso Community Agro-forestry Project PRSP Poverty Reduction Strategy Paper PTACZMP Princess Town Akatakyie Coastal Zone Resource Management Project RC Ricerca e Cooperazione RUDEYA Rural Development Youth Association SIDEP Sefwi Integrated Development Project STEP Skills Training and Employment Programme, __________________________________________________________________________________________________ ii Alternative livelihoods and sustainable resource management PREFACE Governments, Donor agencies, non-governmental organisations and individuals have been promoting the so-called Alternative livelihood schemes, especially in forest fringe communities where people depend on forest resources for survival. The main goals of the activities have been to reduce poverty and unsustainable dependence on forests. Sometimes, this latter goal has been taken to mean weaning people from the forest. Either way however, AL activities have not achieved the desired impacts. This report is the proceedings of a focus group discussion on ‘Alternative livelihoods and sustainable forest management’. The topic raises several interesting questions: for instance, alternative to what? To what extent are these livelihoods really alternatives? Shouldn’t we be talking about sustainable livelihoods? Are forest-based livelihoods necessarily incompatible with sustainable forest management? And then, the concept of weaning people from the forest! Is it to keep the forest for timber production functions, and the timber to some privileged stakeholders? Is it not a way of keeping poor people away from the very assets with the highest potential to provide livelihoods – both timber and non-timber forest products? All these are very legitimate questions. This document considers supplementary livelihoods for forest-fringe communities. The idea should not be to wean them from the forest, but rather to reduce pressure on the forest, i.e. the development of sustainable forest-based livelihoods – a situation in which human livelihoods of all kinds and forest conservation are brought into harmony. Over 50 participants from government ministries, NGOs, research, academic and other institutions engaged in alternative livelihood activities took part in the day-long event. Five papers were presented on the theme after which participants were put into groups to discuss the papers with the view to identifying viable alternatives, success factors and other measures to enhance their ability to reduce poverty and peoples dependence on forests. This was the 4th in the series by TBI-Ghana Focus Group Discussions under the broad theme ‘Collaborative forest management: making the policy work’. Previous topics discussed include Natural resources management in Ghana: challenges to professionalism; Chainsaw lumber production: a necessary evil? and Equity in forest benefit sharing: stakeholders’ views. These are published as TBI-Ghana Workshop Proceedings. By providing a common discussion platform for stakeholders on topical forestry issues, TBI- Ghana promotes collaboration among forest stakeholders and also generates relevant information that can prompt a policy review. In putting the proceedings together, the editors try to objectively represent the views of participants expressed during the discussions. The views are edited for style and consistency but not with respect to the content. The opinions expressed in this publication are thus those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of Tropenbos International or Tropenbos International-Ghana. KSN November, 2005 __________________________________________________________________________________________________
Load more

Recommended publications
  • ASUNAFO NORTH MUNICIPAL ASSEMBLY 1.1 Location and Size
    TABLE OF CONTENTS Table 1.1 ESTABLISHMENT OF THE MUNICIPALITY ..................................................................................... 1 1.2 POPULATION STRUCTURE ............................................................................................................ 1 1.3 MUNICIPAL ECONOMY ................................................................................................................. 1 1.3.1 AGRICULTURE ....................................................................................................................... 1 REPUBLIC OF GHANA 1.3.2 ENERGY ................................................................................................................................. 1 1.3.3 TOURISM ............................................................................................................................... 1 1.3.4 ENVIRONMENT ..................................................................................................................... 1 COMPOSITE BUDGET 1.3.5 HEALTH ................................................................................................................................. 1 1.3.6 EDUCATION ........................................................................................................................... 1 1.3.7 WATER AND SANITATION .................................................................................................... 1 FOR 2019-2022 1.3.8 MARKET CENTRE..................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Asunafo North Municipal Assembly
    REPUBLIC OF GHANA THE COMPOSITE BUDGET OF THE ASUNAFO NORTH MUNICIPAL ASSEMBLY FOR THE 2016 FISCAL YEAR OCTOBER, 2015 Asunafo North Municipal Assembly Page i Addresses for copies of MA’s Composite Budget and references: The Co-ordinating Director, Asunafo North Municipal Assembly Goaso - Brong Ahafo Region Tel: 050-3030205 Website: www.mofep.gov.gh or www.ghanadistricts.com Asunafo North Municipal Assembly Page ii Contents Pages CHAPTER ONE ......................................................................................................................1 PROFILE OF THE MUNICIPAL ASSEMBLY ..................................................................1 1.1 Background/Introduction ........................................................................................................ 1 1.2 Location and Size .................................................................................................................... 1 1.3 Population ............................................................................................................................... 1 1.4.2 Tourism ....................................................................................................................................... 2 1.4.3 Financial institutions ................................................................................................................... 2 1.4.4 Non-banking financial institutions .............................................................................................. 2 1.4.5 Transport Facilities ....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Asunafo North Municipal Assembly 1.4 Key Issues/Challenges of the Municipal Assembly
    TABLE OF CONTENTS Table 1.1 ESTABLISHMENT OF THE MUNICIPALITY ...................................... Error! Bookmark not defined. 1.2 POPULATION STRUCTURE ............................................................. Error! Bookmark not defined. 1.3 MUNICIPAL ECONOMY .................................................................. Error! Bookmark not defined. REPUBLIC OF GHANA 1.3.1 AGRICULTURE ........................................................................ Error! Bookmark not defined. 1.3.2 ENERGY .................................................................................. Error! Bookmark not defined. COMPOSITE BUDGET 1.3.3 TOURISM ................................................................................ Error! Bookmark not defined. 1.3.4 ENVIRONMENT ...................................................................... Error! Bookmark not defined. FOR 2018-2021 1.3.5 HEALTH .................................................................................. Error! Bookmark not defined. PROGRAMME BASED BUDGET ESTIMATES 1.3.6 EDUCATION ............................................................................ Error! Bookmark not defined. 1.3.7 WATER AND SANITATION ..................................................... Error! Bookmark not defined. FOR 2018 1.3.8 MARKET CENTRE.................................................................... Error! Bookmark not defined. 1.3.9 ROAD NETWORK ................................................................... Error! Bookmark not defined. ASUNAFO NORTH MUNICIPAL ASSEMBLY
    [Show full text]
  • Assessment of Community Water and Sanitation in Ghana
    Assessment of Community Water and Sanitation in Ghana Roseemma Mamaa Entsua-Mensah George Essegbey Godfred Frempong Charlotte Engmann ATPS Working Paper Series No. 45 Published by the African Technology Policy Studies Network, P.O. Box 10081, 00100 General Post Office, Nairobi, Kenya © 2007 African Technology Policy Studies Network (ATPS) PUBLISHED BY ATPS COMMUNICATIONS DEPARTMENT Printed by Newtec Concepts P.O. Box 00800, Westlands 14180 Nairobi, Kenya Tel: 4449849, Fax: 4450399 [email protected] ISBN: 9966-916-88-1 ABOUT THE AFRICAN TECHNOLOGY POLICY STUDIES NETWORK The African Technology Policy Studies Network (ATPS) is a multi-disciplinary network of researchers, policymakers, actors in the private sector and other end users interested in generating, promoting and strengthening innovative science and technology policies in Africa. With a regional secretariate in Nairobi, the network operates through national chapters in 23 countries, with an expansion plan to cover the entire sub-Saharan Africa. One of the objectives of the network is to disseminate research results to policy makers, legislators, the organized private sector, civil society, mass media and farmers’ groups through publications, dialogue and advocacy. Among its range of publications are the Working Paper Series (WPS), Research Paper Series (RPS), Special Paper Series (SPS) and the Technopolicy Briefs. Papers published under the Working Paper Series (WPS) are those produced from the ATPS small grants process or from regional projects. The WPS are not subjected to the strict requirements of the RPS but this does not suggest that they do not have significant policy or methodological contribution to make to the work of ATPS. The Board supports all efforts aimed at improving the WPS, such as building skills that will make most of the ATPS research outputs to be published under the RPS.
    [Show full text]
  • Asunafo South District Assembly
    REPUBLIC OF GHANA COMPOSITE BUDGET of the ASUNAFO SOUTH DISTRICT ASSEMBLY for the 2014 FISCAL YEAR TABLE OF CONTENT INTRODUCTION& BACKGROUND ……………………………........................................................3 DISTRICT PROFILE………………………………………………………………………………………………………..3 VISION & MISSION STATEMENT…………………..………………………………………………………………..4 THE ASSEMBLY STRUCTURE.…………………………………………..................................................4 NUMERICAL STRENGTH & SUB-STRUCTURES…………………………….……………………………………..5 STRUCTURE OF THE DISTRICT ECONOMY…………………………………........................................6 DISTRICT ASSEMBLY’S BROAD POLICY OBJECTIVES…………………….......................................9 REPORT ON THE IMPLEMENTATION OF 2013 COMPOSITE BUDGET……………….....................12 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN-2014………………………………….……………………………………………………...13 STATUS OF 2013 BUDGET IMPLEMENTATION FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE (REVENUE)………...18 EXPENDITURE PERFORMANCE ( ALL DEPARTMENT)..………………..……………………………………..19 ESTIMATED COST OF PRIORITY PROGRAMMES AND PROJECTS..……..................................23 OUTSTANDING ARREARS OF DACF PROJECTS 2013……….………………………………………………..24 DEPARTMENTAL CEILING FOR 2014………………..………………………………………………………………27 SUMMARY OF BUDGET PROPOSALS……………..………………………………………………………………...28 ASSUMPTIONS UNDERLYNING THE 2014 BUDGET FORMULATION ………..………………………….29 DDF COMPONENTS 2014………………………………………………………………………………………………..29 MAJOR DEVELOPMENTAL CHALLENGES AND CONSTRAINT………………………………………..……..30 PAYROLL DATA FOR COMPENSATION OF EMPLOYEES ………................................................33 REPORT ON THE IGF
    [Show full text]
  • Asunafo North Municipality
    ASUNAFO NORTH MUNICIPALITY i Copyright © 2014 Ghana Statistical Service ii PREFACE AND ACKNOWLEDGEMENT No meaningful developmental activity can be undertaken without taking into account the characteristics of the population for whom the activity is targeted. The size of the population and its spatial distribution, growth and change over time, in addition to its socio-economic characteristics are all important in development planning. A population census is the most important source of data on the size, composition, growth and distribution of a country’s population at the national and sub-national levels. Data from the 2010 Population and Housing Census (PHC) will serve as reference for equitable distribution of national resources and government services, including the allocation of government funds among various regions, districts and other sub-national populations to education, health and other social services. The Ghana Statistical Service (GSS) is delighted to provide data users, especially the Metropolitan, Municipal and District Assemblies, with district-level analytical reports based on the 2010 PHC data to facilitate their planning and decision-making. The District Analytical Report for the Asunafo North Municipality is one of the 216 district census reports aimed at making data available to planners and decision makers at the district level. In addition to presenting the district profile, the report discusses the social and economic dimensions of demographic variables and their implications for policy formulation, planning and interventions. The conclusions and recommendations drawn from the district report are expected to serve as a basis for improving the quality of life of Ghanaians through evidence-based decision-making, monitoring and evaluation of developmental goals and intervention programmes.
    [Show full text]
  • APPENDIX a Malaria and HIV/AIDS Policies
    APPENDIX A Malaria and HIV/AIDS Policies APPENDIX A APPENDIX A-1: MALARIA PROCEDURE FOR GHANA APPENDIX A-2: HIV/AIDS POLICY APPENDIX A-1: MALARIA PROCEDURE FOR GHANA APPENDIX A -1 NGGL MALARIA PROCEDURE FOR GHANA NOTE : THE CONTENTS OF THIS PROCEDURE ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE WITH CHANGING MEDICAL CONDITIONS AND WILL BE UPDATED APPROPRIATELY. 1. Procedure Malaria is endemic in Ghana. Newmont Ghana is committed to reducing and controlling mosquito presence in and around company provided living, dining and recreational facilities and working locations thereby reducing the exposure to individuals of being bitten by mosquitoes and contracting malaria. The Malaria Guideline addendum to this Malaria Procedure provides substantial additional information about malaria, prevention techniques, descriptions of malaria prophylaxis, treatment, etc. IT IS STRONGLY RECOMMENDED THAT YOU THOROGHLY READ THE INFORMATION IN THE ADDENDUM AND FAMILIARIZE YOURSELF WITH THE PRACTICAL STEPS YOU CAN TAKE TO REDUCE YOUR RISK AND EXPOSURE TO MOSQUITO BITES AND CONTRACTING MALARIA. 2. Background Despite major campaigns to eradicate malaria, the disease remains one of the most important health problems in many parts of the world. According to the World Health Organization (WHO) 110 million clinical cases of malaria occur each year, and most of these cases are reported from Sub-Saharan Africa. The malaria parasites are transmitted to humans by the bite of an infected female Anopheles mosquito. Malaria is a parasitic infection of the liver and blood. When a person is bitten by an infected mosquito, it first injects saliva to prevent the blood from clotting and blocking its mouth parts. The saliva contains the infective form of the malaria parasite, which is transmitted into the human bloodstream.
    [Show full text]
  • Daniel Okity-Boamah.Pdf
    EFFECTS OF INTERMEDIATE CENTRES ON RURAL DEVELOPMENT IN GHANA: A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF OBUASI AND ASUNAFO NORTH MUNICIPALITIES By Daniel Okity-Boamah (B/A. Geography and Rural Development) A thesis submitted to the School of Graduate Studies, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Kumasi in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE DEVELOPMENT POLICY AND PLANNING Department of Planning College of Art and Built Environment August, 2015 DECLARATION I hereby declare that this submission is my own work towards the Master of Science in Development Policy and Planning and that, to the best of my knowledge, it contains neither materials previously published by another person nor materials which have been accepted for the award of any other degree by this or any other university except where due acknowledgement has been made in the text. Daniel Okity-Boamah (PG 5436011) ……………........ …………………… (Name of Student and ID) Signature Date Certified By: Mr. Prince A. Anokye ……………....... …………………… (Name of Supervisor) Signature Date Certified By: Dr. Daniel K. B. Inkoom ……………........ …………………… (Head of Department) Signature Date ii ABSTRACT Ghana as a country seems to be upgrading some of its human settlements and delineating its geographic landscape into additional sub administrative units. The upgrade and creation of these sub-settlement structures with its attendant varied infrastructural development is intended to facilitate development and consequently serving their rural hinterlands with their effects. Years into the practice of Ghana‟s decentralization policy and processes, and despite efforts being made to improve rural livelihood, rural poverty and wide urban-rural disparity still persist. Yet in an era where the country‟s sub-administrative centres, referred to as intermediate centres in this study, are hugely being promoted and undergoing significant socio- economic changes, they are likely to have a profound impact on the conditions of the rural poor and their ability to lift themselves out of poverty.
    [Show full text]
  • The Composite Budget of the Asunafo South District Assembly for the 2016
    REPUBLIC OF GHANA THE COMPOSITE BUDGET OF THE ASUNAFO SOUTH DISTRICT ASSEMBLY FOR THE 2016 FISCAL YEAR TABLE OF CONTENT INTRODUCTION 2 ESTABLISHMENT 2 STRUCTURE OF THE DISTRICT ECONOMY 3 VISION & MISSION STATEMENTS 4 DISTRICT ASSEMBLY’S BROAD POLICY OBJECTIVES WITH GSGDA II 4 KEY ISSUES OF 2016 COMPOSITE BUDGET 5-7 STATUS OF BUDGET IMPLEMENTATION- FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE (IGF) 8-9 ALL REVENUE SOURCES-2015 9-11 EXPENDITURE PERFORMANCE (ALL DEPTS) -2015 11-12 DETAILS OF EXPENDITURE FROM 2015 COMPOSITE BUDGET 12-16 NON- FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE BY DEPARTMENTS AND BY SECTOR 17-21 SUMMARY OF COMMITMENTS ON OUTSTANDING/COMPLETED PROJECTS 22-23 MAJOR DEVELOPMENTAL CHALLENGES AND CONSTRAINTS 34 OUTLOOK FOR 2016 BUDGET 35 REVENUE PROJECTIONS (IGF)-2016 35 ALL REVENUE SOURCES-2016 36 REPORT ON THE REVISED REVENUE MOBILIZATION STRATEGIES 37-38 EXPENDITURE PROJECTIONS-2016 39 SUMMARY OF 2016 EXPENDITURE BUDGET AND FUNDING SOURCES 40 JUSTIFICATION FOR PROJECTS & PROGRAMMES FOR 2016 & CORRESPONDING COST 41-59 Asunafo south District Assembly Page 1 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 Establishment of the District The Asunafo South District which was carved out from the old Asunafo District is one of the twenty-seven (27) District/Municipal Assemblies in the Brong Ahafo Region of the Republic of Ghana. The district was established in November 2004 by the Legislative Instrument 1773 in line with government’s objective of deepening decentralization. The district capital is sited at Kukuom. 1.2 Population Structure According to the 2010 Population Census of Ghana, the population of the district is 95,580. Given an annual growth rate of 2.6% per annum, the figure currently is estimated at 117,449 using geometric growth method.
    [Show full text]
  • Gisela Opoku.Pdf
    KWAME NKRUMAH UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, KUMASI, GHANA COLLEGE OF HEALTH SCIENCES SCHOOL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY HEALTH FERTILITY PREFERENCE AND CONTRACEPTIVE USE IN RURAL AND URBAN COMMUNITIES IN THE ASUNAFO NORTH DISTRICT OF THE BRONG AHAFO REGION GISELA OPOKU, BSc Nursing FEBRUARY, 2014 KWAME NKRUMAH UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, KUMASI, GHANA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY HEALTH FERTILITY PREFERENCE AND CONTRACEPTIVE USE IN RURAL AND URBAN COMMUNITIES IN THE ASUNAFO NORTH DISTRICT OF THE BRONG AHAFO REGION BY GISELA OPOKU (BSc. Nursing) A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY HEALTH, COLLEGE OF HEALTH SCIENCES IN PARTIAL FULFILMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF PUBLIC HEALTH IN HEALTH SERVICES PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT FEBRUARY 2014 II DECLARATION I hereby declare that this submission is my own work towards the MPH and that, to the best of my knowledge, it contains no material previously published by another person, nor material which has been accepted for the award of any other degree of the University, except where due acknowledgement has been made in the text. GISELA OPOKU, 20253548 (STUDENT NAME & ID) ……………………………………………. SIGNATURE ……………………………………………. DATE CERTIFIED BY: PETER AGYEI-BAFFOUR, PhD (SUPERVISOR) ……………………………………………. SIGNATURE …………………………………………… DATE CERTIFIED BY : DR. ANTHONY K. EDUSEI (HEAD OF DEPARTMENT) …………………………………………… SIGNATURE ……………………………………………. DATE III DEDICATION I dedicate this work to my dear husband, Mr. Jaison Osei Boakye, my children Zoe and Kobby and my parents Dr and Mrs Opoku. IV ACKNOWLEDGEMENT I am very grateful to the almighty God for his protection and mercies that have seen me through the successful completion of this programme. I am also particularly indebted to my supervisor Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • BUSHMEAT HUNTERS DO BETTER Indigenous Vs Scientific Habitat Evaluation
    BUSHMEAT HUNTERS DO BETTER Indigenous Vs Scientific Habitat Evaluation Michael Abedi-Lartey March 2004. BUSHMEAT HUNTERS DO BETTER. Indigenous Vs Scientific Habitat Evaluation by Michael Abedi-Lartey Thesis submitted to the International Institute for Geo-information Science and Earth Observation in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Geo-Information Science and Earth Observation Environmental Systems Analysis and Management. Degree Assessment Board Prof. Dr. A. Skidmore, (Chairman œ Supervisor) NRS Department, ITC. Dr. ir. I. M. A. Heitkonig, (External Examiner) Wageningen University. Dr. ir. C. A. J. M. de Bie, (Internal Examiner) NRS Department, ITC. Dr. H.A.M.J. van Gils, (Primary Supervisor) NRS Department, ITC. Ms. Ir. L.M. van Leeuwen, (Secondary Supervisor) NRS Department, ITC. March 2004. INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR GEO-INFORMATION SCIENCE AND EARTH OBSERVATION ENSCHEDE, THE NETHERLANDS. BUSHMEAT HUNTERS DO BETTER: Indigenous Vs Scientific Habitat Evaluation I certify that although I may have conferred with others in preparing for this assignment, and drawn upon a range of sources cited in this work, the content of this thesis report is my original work. Signed ……………………………………. Disclaimer This document describes work undertaken as part of a programme of study at the International Institute for Geo-information Science and Earth Observation. All views and opinions expressed therein remain the sole responsibility of the author, and do not necessarily represent those of the institute. I BUSHMEAT
    [Show full text]
  • Development of a Methodology to Analyse the Post Harvest Systems
    Methodology to assess post-harvest interventions Brong Ahafo Region, Ghana MOFA G D TZ DE SFSP Presented by Schill Maurice on the 9-11 October at the University of Kassel-Witzenhausen Deutscher Tropentag 2002 What is Post-harvest Systems? P.H.S Definition of the post- harvest systems? It includes: ¾All activities e.g. harvesting, transport, storage, processing and marketing. ¾All stakeholders form the private and public sector and from farm level to consumers. ¾In addition, all activities and stakeholders are considered as a whole. Background of the research ¾ Currently, there is no widely recognised method to measure PHS returns. ¾ Lack of qualitative and quantitative information on the interaction of the post harvest activities and their link with production. ¾ Most of the international donor and research institutions are focusing on the development of the production sector, whereas post harvest investments are still at an initial stage. ¾ Isolated approach of intervention. ¾ Due to structural adjustment programs, the private sector has been encouraged to fill the gap left by the state agencies, even though little support has been given to it. Hypotheses of the system approach 1. An intervention in the PHS has an effect on the agriculture production 2. The intervention within one activity of the PHS has an effect on the other activities. 3. The proposed methodology presents with accuracy the global problems in the PHS, thus it permits to address divers economical and technical aspects. Consequently, it allows allocating resources with a better return of investment and finally, it assesses the impact of PHS interventions with exactitude. Effects of Intervention on the Post-harvest System Intervention’s effect from one Intervention area operation (Identified bottleneck) to the other Producer Processing Storage Transport Marketing Consumer Effect on the production Objectives of the research 1.
    [Show full text]