Enac Regulation in the Kidney: the Role of Ankyrin G

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Enac Regulation in the Kidney: the Role of Ankyrin G ENAC REGULATION IN THE KIDNEY: THE ROLE OF ANKYRIN G by Christine A. Klemens B.S. University of Wisconsin, 2005 Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of The School of Medicine in partial fulfillment Of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Pittsburgh 2017 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH SCHOOL OF MEDICINE This dissertation was presented by Christine A. Klemens It was defended on April 11, 2017 and approved by Michael B. Butterworth, Ph.D., Assistant Professor, Cell Biology Daniel C. Devor, Ph.D., Professor, Cell Biology Donald B. DeFranco, Ph.D., Professor, Pharmacology and Chemical Biology Adam V. Kwiatkowski, Ph.D., Assistant Professor, Cell Biology Dissertation Director: Thomas R. Kleyman, M.D., Professor, Cell Biology ii Copyright © by Christine A. Klemens 2017 iii ENAC REGULATION IN THE KIDNEY THE ROLE OF ANKYRIN G Christine A. Klemens, Ph.D. University of Pittsburgh, 2017 The epithelial sodium channel (ENaC) is the limiting entry point for Na+ reabsorption in the distal kidney nephron and is regulated by numerous hormones, including the mineralocorticoid hormone aldosterone. Previously we identified ankyrin G (AnkG), a cytoskeletal protein involved in vesicular transport, as a novel aldosterone-induced protein that can alter Na+ transport in mouse cortical collecting duct cells. AnkG is highly expressed in the kidney, particularly in the distal nephron. Increasing AnkG expression increases ENaC activity while depleting AnkG reduces ENaC-mediated Na+ transport. The underlying mechanism presiding over this effect; however, was unknown. Here we report that AnkG expression directly regulates Na+ transport by altering ENaC activity in the apical membrane. These changes are due to a change in ENaC directly rather than through alterations to the Na+ driving force created by Na+K+ATPase. Using a constitutively open mutant of ENaC and surface biotinylation, we demonstrate that the augmentation of Na+ transport is caused predominantly by increasing the number of ENaCs at the surface rather than alterations to open probability. To determine the mechanism of AnkG action on ENaC surface number, changes in rates of internalization, recycling, and membrane delivery were investigated. AnkG did not alter ENaC delivery to the membrane from biosynthetic pathways or removal by endocytosis; however, AnkG did alter ENaC insertion from constitutive recycling pathways. We also investigated the potential role of a putative AnkG binding domain in the C-terminus of βENaC, and whether single-site mutations of a charged residue and two regulatory phosphorylation sites could disrupt AnkG augmentation of ENaC current. We did not find any significant evidence that this region is essential for AnkG-ENaC interaction. These findings iv provide a mechanism to account for the role of AnkG in the regulation of Na+ transport in the distal kidney nephron. v TABLE OF CONTENTS PREFACE ................................................................................................................................. XIII 1.0 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................ 1 1.1 KIDNEY PHYSIOLOGY ................................................................................... 1 1.1.1 Glomerulus and Bowman’s Capsule .............................................................. 2 1.1.2 Proximal Tubule .............................................................................................. 3 1.1.3 Loop of Henle ................................................................................................... 3 1.1.4 Macula Densa ................................................................................................... 4 1.1.5 Distal Convoluted Tubule ............................................................................... 5 1.1.6 Collecting Duct ................................................................................................. 6 1.1.6.1 Transport in Intercalated Cells ........................................................... 7 1.1.6.2 Transport in Principal Cells................................................................. 7 1.1.7 Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone-System ........................................................ 8 1.1.7.1 Non-genomic Regulation of Aldosterone via miRNAs..................... 11 1.2 EPITHELIAL SODIUM CHANNEL .............................................................. 12 1.2.1 ENaC and Disease .......................................................................................... 12 1.2.2 ENaC Biophysical Properties ....................................................................... 13 1.2.3 ENaC Subunit Structure ............................................................................... 14 1.2.4 Cytoplasmic Domains .................................................................................... 15 1.2.4.1 Ubiquitination of ENaC ...................................................................... 16 1.2.4.2 Phosphorylation Events and ENaC Function ................................... 17 1.2.4.3 The Impact of Palmitoylation on ENaC Subunits............................ 19 vi 1.2.4.4 Cytoskeletal Interactions and ENaC ................................................. 19 1.2.5 Transmembrane Domains ............................................................................ 21 1.2.6 Extracellular Domains .................................................................................. 22 1.2.6.1 Proteolytic Cleavage and ENaC Activation ...................................... 22 1.2.6.2 Na+ Feed-back Inhibition and Self-Inhibition .................................. 23 1.2.6.3 Mechanosensing .................................................................................. 24 1.2.7 ENaC Proteostasis And Trafficking ............................................................ 25 1.3 NA+K+-ATPASE IN THE KIDNEY ................................................................ 29 1.4 ANKYRINS ........................................................................................................ 31 1.4.1 Discovery of Ankyrins ................................................................................... 31 1.4.2 Ankyrins and Disease .................................................................................... 32 1.4.2.1 Hereditary Spherocytosis ................................................................... 33 1.4.2.2 Ankyrin B Syndrome .......................................................................... 33 1.4.2.3 CRASH Syndrome .............................................................................. 34 1.4.2.4 AnkB, KATP, and glucose homeostasis ............................................... 34 1.4.2.5 Bipolar Disorder .................................................................................. 35 1.4.2.6 Brugada Syndome ............................................................................... 36 1.4.3 Ankyrin Domains ........................................................................................... 36 1.4.3.1 Membrane Binding Domain ............................................................... 37 1.4.3.2 Spectrin Binding Domain ................................................................... 38 1.4.3.3 Death Domain ...................................................................................... 39 1.4.3.4 C-terminal Domain ............................................................................. 40 1.4.4 Ankyrin Isoforms ........................................................................................... 43 vii 1.4.4.1 Canonical ankyrins (180-220 kDa) .................................................... 43 1.4.4.2 Small ankyrins (20-120 kDa) .............................................................. 44 1.4.4.3 Large ankyrins (270-480 kDa) ........................................................... 45 1.4.5 Ankyrin Function .......................................................................................... 46 1.4.6 Ankyrins in Epithelia .................................................................................... 47 1.4.6.1 Ankyrin and NKA ............................................................................... 47 1.4.6.2 Ankyrin and the Ammonium Transporter RhBG ........................... 51 1.4.6.3 Ankyrin and E-Cadherin ................................................................... 51 1.4.6.4 Ankyrin and ENaC ............................................................................. 53 1.4.7 Hypothesis ...................................................................................................... 54 2.0 RESULTS ................................................................................................................... 56 2.1 INTRODUCTION - MECHANISM OF ANKG-ENAC INTERACTION .. 56 2.1.1 AnkG is expressed in the kidney in the PT, TAL, DCT, and CD ............. 57 2.1.2 AnkG is expressed at the plasma membrane in mCCD cells .................... 59 2.1.3 Low Na+ diets do not detectably impact AnkG expression in mouse collecting ducts ........................................................................................................... 61 2.1.4 Variable Na+ diets do not change AnkG expression in rat kidneys at either the whole kidney level or in CDs ............................................................................... 63 2.1.5 AnkG expression alters vectorial Na+ transport ......................................... 64 2.1.6 Na+K+-ATPase (NKA) localization is unaffected
Recommended publications
  • Β-Catenin Confers Resistance to PI3K and AKT Inhibitors and Subverts Foxo3a to Promote Metastasis in Colon Cancer
    β-catenin Confers Resistance to PI3K and AKT inhibitors and Subverts FOXO3a to Promote Metastasis in Colon Cancer Stephan P. Tenbaum1§, Paloma Ordóñez-Morán2§#, Isabel Puig1§, Irene Chicote1, Oriol Arqués1, Stefania Landolfi3, Yolanda Fernández4, José Raúl Herance5, Juan D. Gispert5, Leire Mendizabal6, Susana Aguilar7, Santiago Ramón y Cajal3, Simó Schwartz Jr4, Ana Vivancos6, Eloy Espín8, Santiago Rojas5, José Baselga9, Josep Tabernero10, Alberto Muñoz2, Héctor G. Palmer1* 1 Vall d’Hebrón Institut d´Oncología (VHIO). Stem Cells and Cancer Laboratory. Barcelona, Spain. 2 Instituto de Investigaciones Biomédicas "Alberto Sols", Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas-Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain. 3 Department of Pathology, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebrón, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain. 4 Group of Drug Delivery and Targeting, CIBBIM-Nanomedicine and Networking Biomedical Research Center on Bioengineering, Biomaterials and Nanomedicine (CIBER-BBN), Hospital Universitari Vall d’Hebrón, Institut de Recerca Vall d’Hebrón, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain. 5 Parc de Recerca Biomèdica de Barcelona (PRBB), Centre d´Imatge Molecular (CRC) Corporació Sanitària, Barcelona, Spain. 6 Vall d’Hebrón Institut d´Oncología (VHIO). Genomics Cancer Group. Barcelona, Spain. 7 Centre for Respiratory Research, Rayne Institute, University College London, London, United Kingdom, Hematopoietic Stem Cell Laboratory, London Research Institute, Cancer Research UK, London, United Kingdom. 8 General Surgery Service, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebrón, Barcelona, Spain. 9 Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, USA; Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Chevy Chase, USA. 10 Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebrón, Barcelona, Spain. # Swiss Institute for Experimental Cancer Research, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
    [Show full text]
  • A Computational Approach for Defining a Signature of Β-Cell Golgi Stress in Diabetes Mellitus
    Page 1 of 781 Diabetes A Computational Approach for Defining a Signature of β-Cell Golgi Stress in Diabetes Mellitus Robert N. Bone1,6,7, Olufunmilola Oyebamiji2, Sayali Talware2, Sharmila Selvaraj2, Preethi Krishnan3,6, Farooq Syed1,6,7, Huanmei Wu2, Carmella Evans-Molina 1,3,4,5,6,7,8* Departments of 1Pediatrics, 3Medicine, 4Anatomy, Cell Biology & Physiology, 5Biochemistry & Molecular Biology, the 6Center for Diabetes & Metabolic Diseases, and the 7Herman B. Wells Center for Pediatric Research, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN 46202; 2Department of BioHealth Informatics, Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis, Indianapolis, IN, 46202; 8Roudebush VA Medical Center, Indianapolis, IN 46202. *Corresponding Author(s): Carmella Evans-Molina, MD, PhD ([email protected]) Indiana University School of Medicine, 635 Barnhill Drive, MS 2031A, Indianapolis, IN 46202, Telephone: (317) 274-4145, Fax (317) 274-4107 Running Title: Golgi Stress Response in Diabetes Word Count: 4358 Number of Figures: 6 Keywords: Golgi apparatus stress, Islets, β cell, Type 1 diabetes, Type 2 diabetes 1 Diabetes Publish Ahead of Print, published online August 20, 2020 Diabetes Page 2 of 781 ABSTRACT The Golgi apparatus (GA) is an important site of insulin processing and granule maturation, but whether GA organelle dysfunction and GA stress are present in the diabetic β-cell has not been tested. We utilized an informatics-based approach to develop a transcriptional signature of β-cell GA stress using existing RNA sequencing and microarray datasets generated using human islets from donors with diabetes and islets where type 1(T1D) and type 2 diabetes (T2D) had been modeled ex vivo. To narrow our results to GA-specific genes, we applied a filter set of 1,030 genes accepted as GA associated.
    [Show full text]
  • Circular RNA Hsa Circ 0005114‑Mir‑142‑3P/Mir‑590‑5P‑ Adenomatous
    ONCOLOGY LETTERS 21: 58, 2021 Circular RNA hsa_circ_0005114‑miR‑142‑3p/miR‑590‑5p‑ adenomatous polyposis coli protein axis as a potential target for treatment of glioma BO WEI1*, LE WANG2* and JINGWEI ZHAO1 1Department of Neurosurgery, China‑Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin 130033; 2Department of Ophthalmology, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin 130021, P.R. China Received September 12, 2019; Accepted October 22, 2020 DOI: 10.3892/ol.2020.12320 Abstract. Glioma is the most common type of brain tumor APC expression with a good overall survival rate. UALCAN and is associated with a high mortality rate. Despite recent analysis using TCGA data of glioblastoma multiforme and the advances in treatment options, the overall prognosis in patients GSE25632 and GSE103229 microarray datasets showed that with glioma remains poor. Studies have suggested that circular hsa‑miR‑142‑3p/hsa‑miR‑590‑5p was upregulated and APC (circ)RNAs serve important roles in the development and was downregulated. Thus, hsa‑miR‑142‑3p/hsa‑miR‑590‑5p‑ progression of glioma and may have potential as therapeutic APC‑related circ/ceRNA axes may be important in glioma, targets. However, the expression profiles of circRNAs and their and hsa_circ_0005114 interacted with both of these miRNAs. functions in glioma have rarely been studied. The present study Functional analysis showed that hsa_circ_0005114 was aimed to screen differentially expressed circRNAs (DECs) involved in insulin secretion, while APC was associated with between glioma and normal brain tissues using sequencing the Wnt signaling pathway. In conclusion, hsa_circ_0005114‑ data collected from the Gene Expression Omnibus database miR‑142‑3p/miR‑590‑5p‑APC ceRNA axes may be potential (GSE86202 and GSE92322 datasets) and explain their mecha‑ targets for the treatment of glioma.
    [Show full text]
  • Transcriptomic Analysis of Native Versus Cultured Human and Mouse Dorsal Root Ganglia Focused on Pharmacological Targets Short
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/766865; this version posted September 12, 2019. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-ND 4.0 International license. Transcriptomic analysis of native versus cultured human and mouse dorsal root ganglia focused on pharmacological targets Short title: Comparative transcriptomics of acutely dissected versus cultured DRGs Andi Wangzhou1, Lisa A. McIlvried2, Candler Paige1, Paulino Barragan-Iglesias1, Carolyn A. Guzman1, Gregory Dussor1, Pradipta R. Ray1,#, Robert W. Gereau IV2, # and Theodore J. Price1, # 1The University of Texas at Dallas, School of Behavioral and Brain Sciences and Center for Advanced Pain Studies, 800 W Campbell Rd. Richardson, TX, 75080, USA 2Washington University Pain Center and Department of Anesthesiology, Washington University School of Medicine # corresponding authors [email protected], [email protected] and [email protected] Funding: NIH grants T32DA007261 (LM); NS065926 and NS102161 (TJP); NS106953 and NS042595 (RWG). The authors declare no conflicts of interest Author Contributions Conceived of the Project: PRR, RWG IV and TJP Performed Experiments: AW, LAM, CP, PB-I Supervised Experiments: GD, RWG IV, TJP Analyzed Data: AW, LAM, CP, CAG, PRR Supervised Bioinformatics Analysis: PRR Drew Figures: AW, PRR Wrote and Edited Manuscript: AW, LAM, CP, GD, PRR, RWG IV, TJP All authors approved the final version of the manuscript. 1 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/766865; this version posted September 12, 2019. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.
    [Show full text]
  • ANK3 As a Risk Gene for Schizophrenia: New Data in Han Chinese And
    RESEARCH ARTICLE Neuropsychiatric Genetics ANK3 as a Risk Gene for Schizophrenia: New Data in Han Chinese and Meta Analysis Aihua Yuan,1 Zhenghui Yi,1 Qiang Wang,2 Jinhua Sun,1 Zhiqiang Li,3 Yasong Du,1 Chen Zhang,1 Tao Yu,3 Juan Fan,1 Huafang Li,1 and Shunying Yu1* 1Shanghai Mental Health Center, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, P.R. China 2Mental Health Center Psychiatric Laboratory, State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, P.R. China 3Bio-X Center, Key Laboratory for the Genetics of Developmental and Neuropsychiatric Disorders (Ministry of Education), Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, P.R. China Manuscript Received: 13 December 2011; Manuscript Accepted: 4 October 2012 Histological and neuroimaging evidence supports the hypothesis that neuronal disconnectivity may be involved in the pathogenesis How to Cite this Article: of schizophrenia. A genome-wide association study (GWAS) Yuan A, Yi Z, Wang Q, Sun J, Li Z, Du Y, showed a single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP), rs10761482 in Zhang C, Yu T, Fan J, Li H, Yu S. 2012. ANK3 ANK3 ankyrin 3 ( ), a major neuron-enriched gene, was associated as a Risk Gene for Schizophrenia: New Data in with schizophrenia although inconsistent results had been Han Chinese and Meta Analysis. reported. Two meta analyses reported another SNP rs10994336 Am J Med Genet Part B 159B:997–1005. in ANK3 gene confers risk to bipolar disorder (BD). Due to evidence of genetic overlap between schizophrenia and BD, we investigated common findings by analyzing the association of ANK3 polymorphisms (rs10761482, rs10994336, and two mis- from family, adoption, and twins studies supported high herit- senses, rs3808942 and rs3808943) with schizophrenia, using the ability in the development of schizophrenia (80%).
    [Show full text]
  • HCC and Cancer Mutated Genes Summarized in the Literature Gene Symbol Gene Name References*
    HCC and cancer mutated genes summarized in the literature Gene symbol Gene name References* A2M Alpha-2-macroglobulin (4) ABL1 c-abl oncogene 1, receptor tyrosine kinase (4,5,22) ACBD7 Acyl-Coenzyme A binding domain containing 7 (23) ACTL6A Actin-like 6A (4,5) ACTL6B Actin-like 6B (4) ACVR1B Activin A receptor, type IB (21,22) ACVR2A Activin A receptor, type IIA (4,21) ADAM10 ADAM metallopeptidase domain 10 (5) ADAMTS9 ADAM metallopeptidase with thrombospondin type 1 motif, 9 (4) ADCY2 Adenylate cyclase 2 (brain) (26) AJUBA Ajuba LIM protein (21) AKAP9 A kinase (PRKA) anchor protein (yotiao) 9 (4) Akt AKT serine/threonine kinase (28) AKT1 v-akt murine thymoma viral oncogene homolog 1 (5,21,22) AKT2 v-akt murine thymoma viral oncogene homolog 2 (4) ALB Albumin (4) ALK Anaplastic lymphoma receptor tyrosine kinase (22) AMPH Amphiphysin (24) ANK3 Ankyrin 3, node of Ranvier (ankyrin G) (4) ANKRD12 Ankyrin repeat domain 12 (4) ANO1 Anoctamin 1, calcium activated chloride channel (4) APC Adenomatous polyposis coli (4,5,21,22,25,28) APOB Apolipoprotein B [including Ag(x) antigen] (4) AR Androgen receptor (5,21-23) ARAP1 ArfGAP with RhoGAP domain, ankyrin repeat and PH domain 1 (4) ARHGAP35 Rho GTPase activating protein 35 (21) ARID1A AT rich interactive domain 1A (SWI-like) (4,5,21,22,24,25,27,28) ARID1B AT rich interactive domain 1B (SWI1-like) (4,5,22) ARID2 AT rich interactive domain 2 (ARID, RFX-like) (4,5,22,24,25,27,28) ARID4A AT rich interactive domain 4A (RBP1-like) (28) ARID5B AT rich interactive domain 5B (MRF1-like) (21) ASPM Asp (abnormal
    [Show full text]
  • Nuclear Envelope Laminopathies: Evidence for Developmentally Inappropriate Nuclear Envelope-Chromatin Associations
    Nuclear Envelope Laminopathies: Evidence for Developmentally Inappropriate Nuclear Envelope-Chromatin Associations by Jelena Perovanovic M.S. in Molecular Biology and Physiology, September 2009, University of Belgrade M.Phil. in Molecular Medicine, August 2013, The George Washington University A Dissertation submitted to The Faculty of The Columbian College of Arts and Sciences of The George Washington University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy August 31, 2015 Dissertation directed by Eric P. Hoffman Professor of Integrative Systems Biology The Columbian College of Arts and Sciences of The George Washington University certifies that Jelena Perovanovic has passed the Final Examination for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy as of May 5, 2015. This is the final and approved form of the dissertation. Nuclear Envelope Laminopathies: Evidence for Developmentally Inappropriate Nuclear Envelope-Chromatin Associations Jelena Perovanovic Dissertation Research Committee: Eric P. Hoffman, Professor of Integrative Systems Biology, Dissertation Director Anamaris Colberg-Poley, Professor of Integrative Systems Biology, Committee Member Robert J. Freishtat, Associate Professor of Pediatrics, Committee Member Vittorio Sartorelli, Senior Investigator, National Institutes of Health, Committee Member ii © Copyright 2015 by Jelena Perovanovic All rights reserved iii Acknowledgments I am deeply indebted to countless individuals for their support and encouragement during the past five years of graduate studies. First and foremost, I would like to express my gratitude to my mentor, Dr. Eric P. Hoffman, for his unwavering support and guidance, and keen attention to my professional development. This Dissertation would not have been possible without the critical input he provided and the engaging environment he created.
    [Show full text]
  • Effect of Genetic Variation on Salt, Sweet, Fat and Bitter Taste
    Effect of Genetic Variation on Salt, Sweet, Fat and Bitter Taste by Andre Dias A thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Nutritional Sciences University of Toronto © Copyright by Andre Dias 2014 Effect of Genetic Variation on Salt, Sweet, Fat and Bitter Taste Andre Dias Doctor of Philosophy Department of Nutritional Sciences University of Toronto 2014 Abstract Background: Taste is one of the primary determinants of food intake and taste function can be influenced by a number of factors including genetics. However, little is known about the relationship between genetic variation, taste function, food preference and intake. Objective: To examine the effect of variation in genes involved in the perception of salt, sweet, fat and bitter compounds on taste function, food preference and consumption. Methods: Subjects were drawn from the Toronto Nutrigenomics and Health Study, a population of healthy men (n=487) and women (n = 1058). Dietary intake was assessed using a 196-item food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) and food preference was assessed using a 63-item food preference checklist. Subsets of individuals were phenotyped to assess taste function in response to salt (n=95), sucrose (n=95), oleic acid (n=21) and naringin (n=685) stimuli. Subjects were genotyped for Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms (SNPs) in candidate genes. Results: Of the SNPs examined in putative salt taste receptor genes (SCNN1(A, B, D, G), TRPV1), the rs9939129 and rs239345 SNPs in the SCNN1B gene and rs8065080 in the TRPV1 gene were associated with salt taste. In the TAS1R2 gene, the rs12033832 was associated with sucrose taste and sugar intake.
    [Show full text]
  • Chr Start End Size Gene Exon 1 69482 69600 118 OR4F5 1 1 877520
    #chr start end size gene exon 1 69482 69600 118 OR4F5 1 1 877520 877636 116 SAMD11 8 1 877807 877873 66 SAMD11 9 1 877934 878066 132 SAMD11 10 1 878067 878068 1 SAMD11 10 1 878070 878080 10 SAMD11 10 1 896670 896724 54 KLHL17 2 1 896726 896728 2 KLHL17 2 1 935267 935268 1 HES4 1 1 935271 935357 86 HES4 1 1 955548 955694 146 AGRN 1 1 955720 955758 38 AGRN 1 1 984242 984422 180 AGRN 24 1 984611 984629 18 AGRN 25 1 989928 989936 8 AGRN 35 1 1132946 1133034 88 TTLL10 13 1 1149358 1149397 39 TNFRSF4 1 1 1167654 1167713 59 B3GALT6 1 1 1167733 1167853 120 B3GALT6 1 1 1167878 1167908 30 B3GALT6 1 1 1181889 1182075 186 FAM132A 1 1 1200204 1200215 11 UBE2J2 2 1 1219462 1219466 4 SCNN1D 5 1 1223355 1223358 3 SCNN1D 12 1 1232009 1232018 9 ACAP3 15 1 1244308 1244320 12 PUSL1 2 1 1244321 1244327 6 PUSL1 2 1 1247601 1247603 2 CPSF3L 15 1 1290483 1290485 2 MXRA8 5 1 1290487 1290488 1 MXRA8 5 1 1290492 1290516 24 MXRA8 5 1 1290619 1290631 12 MXRA8 4 1 1291003 1291136 133 MXRA8 3 1 1292056 1292089 33 MXRA8 2 1 1334399 1334405 6 CCNL2 1 1 1355427 1355489 62 LOC441869 2 1 1355659 1355917 258 LOC441869 2 1 1361505 1361521 16 TMEM88B 1 1 1361523 1361525 2 TMEM88B 1 1 1361527 1361528 1 TMEM88B 1 1 1361635 1361636 1 TMEM88B 1 1 1361642 1361726 84 TMEM88B 1 1 1361757 1361761 4 TMEM88B 1 1 1362931 1362956 25 TMEM88B 2 1 1374780 1374838 58 VWA1 3 1 1374841 1374842 1 VWA1 3 1 1374934 1375100 166 VWA1 3 1 1389738 1389747 9 ATAD3C 4 1 1389751 1389816 65 ATAD3C 4 1 1389830 1389849 19 ATAD3C 4 1 1390835 1390837 2 ATAD3C 5 1 1407260 1407331 71 ATAD3B 1 1 1407340 1407474
    [Show full text]
  • Ion Channels
    UC Davis UC Davis Previously Published Works Title THE CONCISE GUIDE TO PHARMACOLOGY 2019/20: Ion channels. Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/1442g5hg Journal British journal of pharmacology, 176 Suppl 1(S1) ISSN 0007-1188 Authors Alexander, Stephen PH Mathie, Alistair Peters, John A et al. Publication Date 2019-12-01 DOI 10.1111/bph.14749 License https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ 4.0 Peer reviewed eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California S.P.H. Alexander et al. The Concise Guide to PHARMACOLOGY 2019/20: Ion channels. British Journal of Pharmacology (2019) 176, S142–S228 THE CONCISE GUIDE TO PHARMACOLOGY 2019/20: Ion channels Stephen PH Alexander1 , Alistair Mathie2 ,JohnAPeters3 , Emma L Veale2 , Jörg Striessnig4 , Eamonn Kelly5, Jane F Armstrong6 , Elena Faccenda6 ,SimonDHarding6 ,AdamJPawson6 , Joanna L Sharman6 , Christopher Southan6 , Jamie A Davies6 and CGTP Collaborators 1School of Life Sciences, University of Nottingham Medical School, Nottingham, NG7 2UH, UK 2Medway School of Pharmacy, The Universities of Greenwich and Kent at Medway, Anson Building, Central Avenue, Chatham Maritime, Chatham, Kent, ME4 4TB, UK 3Neuroscience Division, Medical Education Institute, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, University of Dundee, Dundee, DD1 9SY, UK 4Pharmacology and Toxicology, Institute of Pharmacy, University of Innsbruck, A-6020 Innsbruck, Austria 5School of Physiology, Pharmacology and Neuroscience, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 1TD, UK 6Centre for Discovery Brain Science, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH8 9XD, UK Abstract The Concise Guide to PHARMACOLOGY 2019/20 is the fourth in this series of biennial publications. The Concise Guide provides concise overviews of the key properties of nearly 1800 human drug targets with an emphasis on selective pharmacology (where available), plus links to the open access knowledgebase source of drug targets and their ligands (www.guidetopharmacology.org), which provides more detailed views of target and ligand properties.
    [Show full text]
  • Ankyrin-G Regulates Neurogenesis and Wnt Signaling by Altering the Subcellular Localization of Β-Catenin
    Molecular Psychiatry (2015) 20, 388–397 © 2015 Macmillan Publishers Limited All rights reserved 1359-4184/15 www.nature.com/mp ORIGINAL ARTICLE Ankyrin-G regulates neurogenesis and Wnt signaling by altering the subcellular localization of β-catenin O Durak1,6, FC de Anda1,6,7, KK Singh1,8, MP Leussis2,3,4,9, TL Petryshen2,3,4, P Sklar5 and L-H Tsai1 Ankyrin-G is a scaffolding protein required for the formation of the axon initial segment in neurons. Recent genome-wide association studies and whole-exome sequencing have identified ANK3, the gene coding for ankyrin-G, to be a risk gene for multiple neuropsychiatric disorders, such as bipolar disorder, schizophrenia and autism spectrum disorder. Here, we describe a novel role for ankyrin-G in neural progenitor proliferation in the developing cortex. We found that ankyrin-G regulates canonical Wnt signaling by altering the subcellular localization and availability of β-catenin in proliferating cells. Ankyrin-G loss-of-function increases β-catenin levels in the nucleus, thereby promoting neural progenitor proliferation. Importantly, abnormalities in proliferation can be rescued by reducing Wnt pathway signaling. Taken together, these results suggest that ankyrin-G is required for proper brain development. Molecular Psychiatry (2015) 20, 388–397; doi:10.1038/mp.2014.42; published online 13 May 2014 INTRODUCTION E-cadherin in epithelial cells, and is required, along with β2-spectrin, Genome-wide association studies have identified many genes that for the localization of E-cadherin to cell adhesion sites, where it are associated with a risk for mental disorders, such as bipolar assembles a complex that includes the important Wnt pathway 19 disorder, schizophrenia and autism spectrum disorder (ASD).1–7 component β-catenin.
    [Show full text]
  • Identification of Key Pathways and Genes in Dementia Via Integrated Bioinformatics Analysis
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.04.18.440371; this version posted July 19, 2021. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. Identification of Key Pathways and Genes in Dementia via Integrated Bioinformatics Analysis Basavaraj Vastrad1, Chanabasayya Vastrad*2 1. Department of Biochemistry, Basaveshwar College of Pharmacy, Gadag, Karnataka 582103, India. 2. Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Chanabasava Nilaya, Bharthinagar, Dharwad 580001, Karnataka, India. * Chanabasayya Vastrad [email protected] Ph: +919480073398 Chanabasava Nilaya, Bharthinagar, Dharwad 580001 , Karanataka, India bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.04.18.440371; this version posted July 19, 2021. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. Abstract To provide a better understanding of dementia at the molecular level, this study aimed to identify the genes and key pathways associated with dementia by using integrated bioinformatics analysis. Based on the expression profiling by high throughput sequencing dataset GSE153960 derived from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO), the differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between patients with dementia and healthy controls were identified. With DEGs, we performed a series of functional enrichment analyses. Then, a protein–protein interaction (PPI) network, modules, miRNA-hub gene regulatory network and TF-hub gene regulatory network was constructed, analyzed and visualized, with which the hub genes miRNAs and TFs nodes were screened out. Finally, validation of hub genes was performed by using receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis.
    [Show full text]