Iac-02.C1.3.8 an Automated Science

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Iac-02.C1.3.8 an Automated Science IAC-02.C1.3.8 AN AUTOMATED SCIENCE OBSERVATION SCHEDULING SYSTEM FOR MESSENGER Teck H. Choo, Brian J. Anderson, Robert J. Steele, Joseph P. Skura, and Peter D. Bedini The Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory, Laurel, MD 20723, USA improves operational safety and efficiency and optimizes science return. It enabled a small team of I. Abstract scientists to schedule an average of 500 science Launched in August 2004, the MErcury Surface, observations per week achieved with approximately 3 Space ENvironment, GEochemistry, and Ranging 50,000 instrument commands . The MESSENGER (MESSENGER) spacecraft will be the first to orbit mission extends CRISM SciBox from a single- Mercury, beginning in March 2011. The spacecraft instrument concept to a system capable of scheduling carries seven science instruments and a radio all observations from the array of MESSENGER experiment designed to study all aspects of Mercury investigations and providing an automated approach and its environment. Scheduling science observations to generate an integrated, conflict-free observing to meet all measurement objectives during the schedule for the entire orbital mission phase. primary orbital phase of the mission is a considerable MESSENGER SciBox is an automated science challenge due to the thermally harsh environment and planning and commanding system that simulates the restricted viewing opportunities. The MESSENGER entire orbital mission and schedules science team therefore developed an integrated planning and observations within operational constraints using commanding system, MESSENGER SciBox, to models for each instrument and key spacecraft 4 simulate the entire orbital-phase observation plan, resources. The orbital operational challenges, the evaluate a variety of scheduling strategies, anticipate approach adopted by the MESSENGER science foreseeable contingencies, analyze their impacts, and operations team, and the general architecture of the develop mitigation strategies, all before orbit MESSENGER SciBox have been described insertion. In this paper we describe the architecture of previously.4 In this paper we focus on the the automated scheduling system, which is the core Opportunity Search Engine and the Schedule of the MESSENGER SciBox. Optimizer, which are at the core of the automated science observation scheduling capability of II. Introduction MESSENGER SciBox. The key new features of the Space science missions often use a labor- MESSENGER SciBox scheduling system are the intensive approach to science observation scheduling automated scheduling for the entire suite of and instrument commanding in which scientists or instruments, the guidance and control (G&C) system, engineers generate and review instrument and and the radio frequency (RF) telecommunication spacecraft commands manually. For example, the system. A background summary of the Cassini mission uses multiple working groups, MESSENGER mission is given in Section III. distributed planning tools, and a multi-level science Section IV presents an overview of MESSENGER planning and review process to achieve a conflict- SciBox. Section V covers the automated scheduling free science observation schedule 1,2 . An initial system. Section VI reviews sample outputs generated departure from this methodology was made by the by the scheduling system, and section VII concludes Compact Reconnaissance Imaging Spectrometer for with a summary and future plans. Mars (CRISM) instrument team on the Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter (MRO) mission. The CRISM III. Background 5 team developed SciBox, a fully automated science NASA’s MESSENGER spacecraft was launched observation scheduling software system, for their on 3 August 2004 from Cape Canaveral Air Force instrument. 3 The CRISM SciBox tool demonstrated Station, Florida. To lower the spacecraft orbital that a well-designed software system significantly energy relative to Mercury, three flyby encounters simplifies the planning and commanding process, with Mercury have been preformed: on 14 January 1 2008, 6 October 2008, and 29 September 2009. The Composition Spectrometer (MASCS), which includes one-year primary orbital mission phase will begin two sensors, the Visible and Infrare d Spectrograph when MESSENGER enters into orbit about Mercury (VIRS) and the Ultraviolet and Visible Spectrometer in March 2011.6 The orbit will be non -Sun- (UVVS); and an Energetic Particle and Plasma synchronous and highly elliptical at 200 km x 15,200 Spectrometer (EPPS), which includes a Fast Imaging km altitude, with an orbital inclination of Plasma Spectrometer (FIPS) and an Energetic approximately 82.5° and an orbital period of Particle Spectrometer (EPS). The fixed remote- approximately 12 hours. sen sing instruments, MASCS, XRS, GRNS, and The mission was designed to address the MLA, are mounted with a common boresight that is following six key scientific questions: normal to both the direction to the center of the 1. What planetary formational processes led to sunshade and to the solar array axis. The MDIS the high ratio of metal to silicate in camera is mounted on a pivot that provides some Mercury? freedom to view sunwar d and anti -sunward of the 2. What is the geological history of Mercury? common boresight direction. 3. What are the nature and origin of Mercury’s The science questions motivate observation magnetic field? objectives and measurement requirements. For 4. What are the structure and state of planning purposes, the measurement requirements are Mercury’s core? organized by observational activity type and are 5. What are the radar-reflective materials at summarized in Table 1. Mercury’s poles? 6. What are the important volatile species and Table 1. Summary of MESSENGER Science their sources and sinks on and near Observation Activities . Mercury? Observation Measurement requirements These questions guided the development of the Activity and relevant mission, the seven instruments 7, and a radio science instrument/investigation (RS) experiment. The seven instruments, illustrated Global • Monochrome imaging with in Figure 1, include the Mercury Dual Imaging surface >90% coverage at 250 -m System (MDIS) with wide-angle and narrow -angle mapping average resolution or better for geological characterization: MDIS • Multispectral imaging with > 90% coverage at 2 km/pixel average resolution or better for mineralogy: MDIS • Stereoscopic imaging with > 80% coverage for global topography: MDIS • Elemental abundance determination: GRNS, X RS • High-resolution spectral measurements of geological units for mineralogy: VIRS Figure 1: MESSENGER Science Payload. This Northern • Northern hemisphere topography view shows the MESSENGER spacecraft from the hemisphere measurement for obliquity and +Z side of the main body together with detailed and polar libration amplitude views of the payload sub-systems. The remote region determination: MLA sensing instruments are mounted so a s to view in observations • Composition of polar d eposits: the +Z direction (out of the page). The spacecraft GRNS sunshade is on the left in green, and the solar • Polar ionized species panels and Magnetometer boom are not shown in measurement s for volatile this close -up. identification: EPPS cameras; a Gamma-Ray and N eutron Spectrometer • Polar exosphere measurement s (GRNS); an X-Ray Spectrometer (XRS); a for volatile identification: UVVS Magnetometer (MAG); the Mercury Laser A ltimeter In-situ • Mapping magnetic field to (MLA); the Mercury Atmospheric and Surface observations characterize the internally 2 generated field: MAG science data. Science data taken by the instruments • Determining magnetosphere are compressed prior to storage on the SSR. Once a structure, plasma pressure day, for eight hours, the compressed data are distributions, and their downlinked to the Deep Space Network (DSN). The dynamics: MAG, EPPS available downlink bandwidth varies with the • Solar wind pick-up ions to Mercury-Earth distance, the Sun-Earth- understand volatiles: EPPS MESSENGER angle, and the DSN station viewing Exosphere • Neutral species in exosphere to geometry. During solar conjunctions there is no survey understand volatiles: UVVS downlink activity. Due to the highly variable Region-of- • High-resolution imaging, downlink capability, science observations must be interest spectroscopy, photometry to carefully scheduled not to overflow the SSR. targeting support geology, mineralogy, and topography: MDIS Complex Observing Geometry During the orbital science phase, because of the Radio science • Gravity field determination to highly elliptical orbit, the surface-track speed peaks measurements support characterization of at 3.7 km/s at periapsis and drops to 0.6 km/s at internal structure (in apoapsis. Scheduled observations must account for combination with topography both the orbital distance and velocity. and libration): RS Observation opportunities are limited by Mercury’s orbit and rotation. Mercury is in a 3:2 IV. Orbital Operational Challenges spin-orbit resonance; its rotation period is long (56 Shortly after MESSENGER is inserted into orbit days), and it completes one and a half rotations in about Mercury in March 2011, the one-year orbital inertial space every 88-day orbit about the Sun, primary science phase begins. The MESSENGER resulting in a 176-day solar day. The MESSENGER science operations team will face the challenge of orbit plane is approximately fixed in inertial space, planning and scheduling the set of ambitious science and this implies that comparable viewing geometries
Recommended publications
  • Digital Opportunity: a Review of Intellectual Property and Growth
    Digital Opportunity A Review of Intellectual Property and Growth An Independent Report by Professor Ian Hargreaves May 2011 Contents Page Foreword by Ian Hargreaves 01 Executive Summary 03 Chapter 1 Intellectual Property and Growth 10 Chapter 2 The Evidence Base 16 Chapter 3 The International Context 21 Chapter 4 Copyright Licensing: a Moment of Opportunity 26 Chapter 5 Copyright: Exceptions for the Digital Age 41 Chapter 6 Patents 53 Chapter 7 Designs 64 Chapter 8 Enforcement and Disputes 67 Chapter 9 SMEs and the IP Framework 86 Chapter 10 An Adaptive IP Framework 91 Chapter 11 Impact 97 Annex A Terms of Reference 101 Annex B Stakeholders Met during Review of IP and Growth 102 Annex C Call for Evidence Submissions 105 Annex D List of Supporting Documents 109 Foreword When the Prime Minister commissioned this review in November 2010, he did so in terms which some considered provocative. The Review was needed, the PM said, because of the risk that the current intellectual property framework might not be sufficiently well designed to promote innovation and growth in the UK economy. In the five months we have had to compile the Review, we have sought never to lose sight of David Cameron’s “exam question”. Could it be true that laws designed more than three centuries ago with the express purpose of creating economic incentives for innovation by protecting creators’ rights are today obstructing innovation and economic growth? The short answer is: yes. We have found that the UK’s intellectual property framework, especially with regard to copyright, is falling behind what is needed.
    [Show full text]
  • Educator's Guide
    EDUCATOR’S GUIDE ABOUT THE FILM Dear Educator, “ROVING MARS”is an exciting adventure that This movie details the development of Spirit and follows the journey of NASA’s Mars Exploration Opportunity from their assembly through their Rovers through the eyes of scientists and engineers fantastic discoveries, discoveries that have set the at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory and Steve Squyres, pace for a whole new era of Mars exploration: from the lead science investigator from Cornell University. the search for habitats to the search for past or present Their collective dream of Mars exploration came life… and maybe even to human exploration one day. true when two rovers landed on Mars and began Having lasted many times longer than their original their scientific quest to understand whether Mars plan of 90 Martian days (sols), Spirit and Opportunity ever could have been a habitat for life. have confirmed that water persisted on Mars, and Since the 1960s, when humans began sending the that a Martian habitat for life is a possibility. While first tentative interplanetary probes out into the solar they continue their studies, what lies ahead are system, two-thirds of all missions to Mars have NASA missions that not only “follow the water” on failed. The technical challenges are tremendous: Mars, but also “follow the carbon,” a building block building robots that can withstand the tremendous of life. In the next decade, precision landers and shaking of launch; six months in the deep cold of rovers may even search for evidence of life itself, space; a hurtling descent through the atmosphere either signs of past microbial life in the rock record (going from 10,000 miles per hour to 0 in only six or signs of past or present life where reserves of minutes!); bouncing as high as a three-story building water ice lie beneath the Martian surface today.
    [Show full text]
  • The Cassini-Huygens Mission
    International Project Management: The Cassini-Huygens Mission NASA Case Study NASA Academy of Program/Project & Engineering Leadership http://appel.nasa.gov How would you explore the moons of Saturn? (watch a video: http://saturn.jpl.nasa.gov/video/videodetails/?videoID=19) http://appel.nasa.gov Cassini-Huygens ¾ U.S. - European mission to explore Saturn ¾ NASA and Italian Space Agency: Cassini spacecraft ¾ European Space Agency: Huygens probe ¾ Launched October 1997 ¾ 6.7 year voyage to Saturn http://appel.nasa.gov Cassini and Huygens Cassini Huygens • Delivered Huygens • Released by Cassini to probe to Titan land on surface of • Remained in orbit Saturn’s moon Titan around Saturn for • Investigated detailed studies of the characteristics of Titan’s planet, its rings and atmosphere and surface satellites (moons) Cassini Huygens Saturn Titan http://appel.nasa.gov Cassini-Huygens: the Complex Project Environment Complex Project-Based Functional Organization Organization Problems Novel Routine Technology New/invented Improved/more efficient Team Global, multidisciplinary Local, homogeneous Cost Life cycle Unit Schedule Project completion Productivity rate Customer Involved at inception Involved at point of sale Survival skill Adaptation Control/stability Discussion point: does this model describe Cassini-Huygens? http://appel.nasa.gov Defining Project Complexity at NASA PROGRAMMATIC TECHNICAL Budget Interfaces/systems engineering • Congressional appropriations • Changing agency Technological readiness constraints and priorities One-of-a-kind
    [Show full text]
  • SEP Events Observed to Date ('FTO', Ions, Electrons)
    9th International Conference on Mars 25 July 2019 Space Weather at Mars: 4.5 Years of ………… observations This slide package was presented at the Ninth International Conference on Mars and is being shared, with permission from the plenary presenter. The original file has been compressed in size and converted to .pdf – please contact the presenter if interested in the original presentation Christina O. Lee1 J. G. Luhmann1, B. M. Jakosky2, D. A. Brain2 J. S. Halekas3, E. M. B.Thiemann2, P. Chamberlin2 J. Gruesbeck4, J. R. Espley4 A. Rahmati1, P. Dunn1, R. J. Lillis1, D. E. Larson1, S. M. Curry1 1 Space Sciences Lab/UC Berkeley, 2 CU/LASP, 3 U of Iowa, 4 NASA/GSFC Space Weather 101 Solar flares are local bursts of radiation. Coronal mass ejections (CMEs) are magnetized clouds of charged particles that spreads out into space. Video removed - contact presenter if interested SOHO/LASCO C3 Space Weather 101 Solar Energetic Particles (SEPS) are accelerated by the shock fronts created by these explosions. An observer magnetically connected to the shock via the interplanetary magnetic field (IMF) can detect these particles. Image credit: NASA/STEREO mission Without a strong planetary dipole magnetic field or thick atmosphere like Earth, exposure of equipment and explorers to the space environment is relatively direct at Mars. Mars Earth Image: NASA/GSFC In particular, SEP protons of up to several hundred MeV or more can affect orbiting spacecraft, landed systems and human explorers. Here, a solar coronagraph located at Earth’s L1 point experiences a Video removed - contact presenter if interested ‘snowstorm’ of SEPs.
    [Show full text]
  • Insight Brief Racing to Accelerate Electric Vehicle Adoption 02
    M OUN KY T C A I insightO briefN Racing to Accelerate Electric Vehicle Adoption 1 R Racing to Accelerate Electric Vehicle Adoption: I N E STIT U T Decarbonizing Transportation with Ridehailing insight brief January 2021 Authors HIGHLIGHTS Ross McLane Rocky Mountain Institute The race is on to deploy well over 50 million battery and plug-in hybrid electric vehicles (EVs) EJ Klock-McCook in the United States by 2030. This—in addition to reducing vehicle miles traveled, strategically Rocky Mountain Institute redesigning urban areas, and improving public transit and nonmotorized transport—is Shenshen Li necessary if we are to limit global temperature rise to 1.5°C. To achieve this scale of ambition, Rocky Mountain Institute every opportunity for acceleration must be exploited. John Schroeder Rocky Mountain Institute Why then do we turn our attention to transportation network company (TNC) vehicles, which represent a very small portion of total miles in the United States? We believe they offer key Contributors catalytic opportunities: Alex Keros A full-time TNC driver travels approximately three times as many miles per year as the average General Motors EV/AV Program • American and therefore has a lot to gain from lower battery EV operating costs. RMI Data Science Team Rocky Mountain Institute • Concentrated fleets of electric TNC vehicles can serve as critical anchor tenants for much-needed high-speed public charging, helping to enable broader deployment in more diverse parts of cities. Contacts • Each vehicle serves many passengers, which, if electric, provides a valuable public education Ross McLane and awareness opportunity. [email protected] EJ Klock-McCook Rocky Mountain Institute collaborated with General Motors (GM) to better understand the [email protected] challenges and opportunities of TNC electrification by evaluating a year of actual operational data—of both EVs and internal combustion engine (ICE) vehicles operating in TNC services.
    [Show full text]
  • Dawn Mission to Vesta and Ceres Symbiosis Between Terrestrial Observations and Robotic Exploration
    Earth Moon Planet (2007) 101:65–91 DOI 10.1007/s11038-007-9151-9 Dawn Mission to Vesta and Ceres Symbiosis between Terrestrial Observations and Robotic Exploration C. T. Russell Æ F. Capaccioni Æ A. Coradini Æ M. C. De Sanctis Æ W. C. Feldman Æ R. Jaumann Æ H. U. Keller Æ T. B. McCord Æ L. A. McFadden Æ S. Mottola Æ C. M. Pieters Æ T. H. Prettyman Æ C. A. Raymond Æ M. V. Sykes Æ D. E. Smith Æ M. T. Zuber Received: 21 August 2007 / Accepted: 22 August 2007 / Published online: 14 September 2007 Ó Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007 Abstract The initial exploration of any planetary object requires a careful mission design guided by our knowledge of that object as gained by terrestrial observers. This process is very evident in the development of the Dawn mission to the minor planets 1 Ceres and 4 Vesta. This mission was designed to verify the basaltic nature of Vesta inferred both from its reflectance spectrum and from the composition of the howardite, eucrite and diogenite meteorites believed to have originated on Vesta. Hubble Space Telescope observations have determined Vesta’s size and shape, which, together with masses inferred from gravitational perturbations, have provided estimates of its density. These investigations have enabled the Dawn team to choose the appropriate instrumentation and to design its orbital operations at Vesta. Until recently Ceres has remained more of an enigma. Adaptive-optics and HST observations now have provided data from which we can begin C. T. Russell (&) IGPP & ESS, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1567, USA e-mail: [email protected] F.
    [Show full text]
  • Delta II Dawn Mission Booklet
    Delta Launch Vehicle Programs Dawn United Launch Alliance is proud to launch the Dawn mission. Dawn will be launched aboard a Delta II 7925H launch vehicle from Cape Canaveral Air Force Station (CCAFS), Florida. The launch vehicle will deliver the Dawn spacecraft into an Earth- escape trajectory, where it will commence its journey to the solar system’s main asteroid belt to gather comparative data from dwarf planet Ceres and asteroid Vesta. United Launch Alliance provides the Delta II launch service under the NASA Launch Services (NLS) contract with the NASA Kennedy Space Center Expendable Launch Services Program. We are delighted that NASA has chosen the Delta II for this Discovery Mission. I congratulate the entire Delta team for their significant efforts that resulted in achieving this milestone and look forward to continued launches of scientific space missions aboard the Delta launch vehicle. Kristen T. Walsh Director, NASA Programs Delta Launch Vehicles 1 Dawn Mission Overview The Dawn spacecraft will make an eight-year journey to the main asteroid belt between Mars and Jupiter in an effort to significantly increase our understanding of the conditions and processes acting at the solar system’s earliest epoch by examining the geophysical properties of the asteroid Vesta and dwarf planet Ceres. Evidence shows that Vesta and Ceres have distinct characteristics and, therefore, must have followed different evolutionary paths. By observing both, with the same set of instruments, scientists hope to develop an understanding of the transition from the rocky inner regions, of which Vesta is characteristic, to the icy outer regions, of which Ceres is representative.
    [Show full text]
  • The Cassini-Huygens Mission Overview
    SpaceOps 2006 Conference AIAA 2006-5502 The Cassini-Huygens Mission Overview N. Vandermey and B. G. Paczkowski Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91109 The Cassini-Huygens Program is an international science mission to the Saturnian system. Three space agencies and seventeen nations contributed to building the Cassini spacecraft and Huygens probe. The Cassini orbiter is managed and operated by NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory. The Huygens probe was built and operated by the European Space Agency. The mission design for Cassini-Huygens calls for a four-year orbital survey of Saturn, its rings, magnetosphere, and satellites, and the descent into Titan’s atmosphere of the Huygens probe. The Cassini orbiter tour consists of 76 orbits around Saturn with 45 close Titan flybys and 8 targeted icy satellite flybys. The Cassini orbiter spacecraft carries twelve scientific instruments that are performing a wide range of observations on a multitude of designated targets. The Huygens probe carried six additional instruments that provided in-situ sampling of the atmosphere and surface of Titan. The multi-national nature of this mission poses significant challenges in the area of flight operations. This paper will provide an overview of the mission, spacecraft, organization and flight operations environment used for the Cassini-Huygens Mission. It will address the operational complexities of the spacecraft and the science instruments and the approach used by Cassini- Huygens to address these issues. I. The Mission Saturn has fascinated observers for over 300 years. The only planet whose rings were visible from Earth with primitive telescopes, it was not until the age of robotic spacecraft that questions about the Saturnian system’s composition could be answered.
    [Show full text]
  • Cassini-Huygens
    High Ambitions for an Outstanding Planetary Mission: Cassini-Huygens Composite image of Titan in ultraviolet and infrared wavelengths taken by Cassini’s imaging science subsystem on 26 October. Red and green colours show areas where atmospheric methane absorbs light and reveal a brighter (redder) northern hemisphere. Blue colours show the high atmosphere and detached hazes (Courtesy of JPL /Univ. of Arizona) Cassini-Huygens Jean-Pierre Lebreton1, Claudio Sollazzo2, Thierry Blancquaert13, Olivier Witasse1 and the Huygens Mission Team 1 ESA Directorate of Scientific Programmes, ESTEC, Noordwijk, The Netherlands 2 ESA Directorate of Operations and Infrastructure, ESOC, Darmstadt, Germany 3 ESA Directorate of Technical and Quality Management, ESTEC, Noordwijk, The Netherlands Earl Maize, Dennis Matson, Robert Mitchell, Linda Spilker Jet Propulsion Laboratory (NASA/JPL), Pasadena, California Enrico Flamini Italian Space Agency (ASI), Rome, Italy Monica Talevi Science Programme Communication Service, ESA Directorate of Scientific Programmes, ESTEC, Noordwijk, The Netherlands assini-Huygens, named after the two celebrated scientists, is the joint NASA/ESA/ASI mission to Saturn Cand its giant moon Titan. It is designed to shed light on many of the unsolved mysteries arising from previous observations and to pursue the detailed exploration of the gas giants after Galileo’s successful mission at Jupiter. The exploration of the Saturnian planetary system, the most complex in our Solar System, will help us to make significant progress in our understanding
    [Show full text]
  • What Developers Are Saying About Messenger Platform
    What developers are saying about Messenger Platform "No one wants to call people anymore. Messenger has opened up the single greatest way to chat with businesses since the telephone. Add in bots, and it allows businesses to deliver instant service and even sell via Messenger at scale. The speed at which Messenger innovates is unlike anyone else. That's a win for both developers and brands." -Laura Meyer, VP of Partnerships "The rapid progress of the Messenger platform over the last year has provided fertile ground upon which entirely new categories can be created. At Automat we are focused on Conversational Marketing and have partnered with innovative brands like L’Oréal who are committed to adopting Messenger as a place to create engaging consumer experiences that bridge personalization, content creation and e-commerce opportunities. The results we’re seeing are fantastic!” -Andy Mauro, CEO "What shocked me the most about working with Facebook and the Messenger team is that despite their scale, they're willing to take a pretty incredible amount of risk in terms of iterating on features and changing the paradigm. For a company like Blackstorm, this has been an unbelievable experience!” -Michael Carter, CEO “Messenger is now set to become the world’s largest gaming platform they're revolutionizing the way that games are shared, played and enjoyed. We can't imagine a better place to bring our games and tech.” -Ernestine Fu, Co-founder “Messenger and Instant Games have been an amazing platform for EverWing. The Instant Games team is constantly adding new features and working with us to build an awesome experience.” -Tom Fairfield, Co-founder "Our vision is to make the life better for 1 billion people through our applications, and we strongly believe that chat platforms like Facebook Messenger will drive the next opportunities to reach, engage and offer products, services, and experiences to our customers.
    [Show full text]
  • What Makes a Rover?
    What Makes a Rover? WHAT MAKES A ROVER? HOW DO SCIENTISTS USE THEM TO DISCOVER FAR AWAY PLACES? Use this activity guide to explore rovers that humans have built, then design one of your own to explore a location in the solar system! HOW DOES IT WORK? SKILLS Complete the activities in this guide to research, design, build, and test Asking Questions your own rovers! Use the instructions on the following pages to Developing and Using guide your research and design process. Directions for each activity Models are on the following pages: Rover Research (pages 2-3), Design Planning and Carrying out Investigations Challenge: Rovers (pages 4-5), Rover Races (page 6). Analyzing and Interpreting Data Obtaining, Evaluating, and Communicating Information CONCEPTS Cause and Effect Structure and Function STANDARDS More information regarding the NGSS standards of this activity is available at the end of this guide (page 9). WHAT’S A ROVER? Stay Connected! When humans want to learn about other planets or objects in the solar Be sure to share your system, they can use tools like telescopes, satellites, and rovers. A research, designs, and rover is a small, mobile robot that scientists send to moons and planets prototypes with us online to land on their surfaces and explore. Rovers can take pictures and by tagging collect information about the planet by taking temperature readings, @chabotspace, or using rock, and soil samples. The rovers then send this information back to the hashtags scientists on earth through radio signals. Rovers can help scientists learn #ChabotRovers and about faraway places without having to send people to space, which #LearningLaunchpad can be tricky! ROVER RESEARCH NASA uses rovers to explore other places in our solar system.
    [Show full text]
  • Modeling Risk Perception for Mars Rover Supervisory Control: Before and After Wheel Damage Alex J
    Modeling Risk Perception for Mars Rover Supervisory Control: Before and After Wheel Damage Alex J. Stimpson Matthew B. Tucker Masahiro Ono Amanda Steffy Mary L. Cummings Humans and Humans and NASA Jet NASA Jet Humans and Autonomy Lab Autonomy Lab Propulsion Propulsion Autonomy Lab 144 Hudson Hall 144 Hudson Hall Laboratory, Laboratory, 144 Hudson Hall Durham NC 27708 Durham NC 27708 California Institute California Institute Durham NC 27708 (352) 256-7455 (919) 402-3853 of Technology of Technology (919) 660-5306 Alexander.Stimpson Matthew.b.tucker 4800 Oak Grove 4800 Oak Grove Mary.Cummings@d @duke.edu @duke.edu Drive Pasadena, CA Drive Pasadena, CA uke.edu 91109 91109 Masahiro.Ono Amanda.C.Steffy @jpl.nasa.gov @jpl.nasa.gov Abstract— The perception of risk can dramatically influence the was designed to help collect data that can be used to assess the human selection of semi-autonomous system control strategies, past or present capability to support microbial life. In short, particularly in safety-critical systems like unmanned vehicle Curiosity was sent to Mars in order to determine the planet’s operation. Thus, the ability to understand the components of risk habitability [1]. perception can be extremely valuable in developing either operational strategies or decision support technologies. To this The Curiosity rover left Earth on November 26th, 2011. end, this paper analyzes the differences in human supervisory Approximately nine months later, the MSL curiosity rover control of Mars Science Laboratory rover operation before and th after the discovery of wheel damage. This paper identifies four landed on Mars on August 6 , 2012.
    [Show full text]