DOCSLIB.ORG

The Agnew Clinic, an 1889 Oil Painting by American Artist Thomas Eakins

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Agnew Clinic, an 1889 Oil Painting by American Artist Thomas Eakins Antisepsis and women in surgery 12 The Gross ClinicThe, byPharos Thomas/Winter Eakins, 2019 1875. Photo by Geoffrey Clements/Corbis/VCG via Getty Images The Agnew Clinic, an 1889 oil painting by American artist Thomas Eakins. Universal History Archive/UIG via Getty images Don K. Nakayama, MD, MBA Dr. Nakayama (AΩA, University of California, San Francisco, Los Angeles, 1986, Alumnus), emeritus professor of history 1977) is Professor, Department of Surgery, University of of medicine at Johns Hopkins, referring to Joseph Lister North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC. (1827–1912), pioneer in the use of antiseptics in surgery. The interpretation fits so well that each surgeon risks he Gross Clinic (1875) and The Agnew Clinic (1889) being consigned to a period of surgery to which neither by Thomas Eakins (1844–1916) face each other in belongs; Samuel D. Gross (1805–1884), to the dark age of the Philadelphia Museum of Art, in a hall large surgery, patients screaming during operations performed TenoughT to accommodate the immense canvases. The sub- without anesthesia, and suffering slow, agonizing deaths dued lighting in the room emphasizes Eakins’s dramatic use from hospital gangrene, and D. Hayes Agnew (1818–1892), of light. The dark background and black frock coats worn by to the modern era of aseptic surgery. In truth, Gross the doctors in The Gross Clinic emphasize the illuminated was an innovator on the vanguard of surgical practice. head and blood-covered fingers of the surgeon, and a bleed- Agnew, as lead consultant in the care of President James ing gash in pale flesh, barely recognizable as a human thigh. A. Garfield after he was shot in 1881, had been denounced Across the room, the entire canvas of The Agnew Clinic because antiseptics had not been used. seems to glow, the surgeon and his assistants all in white. Appropriate to his prominence in American art, Eakins' The patient, a woman, is placid under anesthesia, her scholarship covers all aspects of his artistry, antecedents, healthy right breast in full view. Unlike the companion and influences. Receiving less attention are the subjects piece, surgery is hidden, the only evidence being small themselves, two of the foremost surgeons of their time. splatters of blood on linen and the surgeons’ gowns. Why were surgeons immortalized by the greatest American For the viewer, especially a surgeon, the paintings are artist of the 19th century? As Brieger notes, the two por- breathtaking images of the past and future of surgery. traits span the era of antiseptic surgery, one of the great Eakins’s message is clear: “We are now iconographically advances in medicine.1 Eakins, a master of Realism, per- in the age of Lister,” 1 writes Gert Brieger (AΩA, David ceived another trend that would forever change the field: Geffen School of Medicine at the University of California; The entry of women in surgery. The Pharos/Winter 2019 13 Antisepsis and women in surgery A comprehensive book on Eakins and The Gross Clinic is medical schools across the United States came to Gross Thomas Eakins: The Heroism of Modern Life, by Elizabeth with offers of professorships. He accepted two: the first Johns, art historian at the University of Pennsylvania.2 at the University of Louisville in 1840, then his alma ma- Sidney Kirkpatrick, a bestselling author, has a more recent ter, Jefferson Medical College, in 1856. At the latter, he biography of Eakins, The Revenge of Thomas Eakins, with wrote two more widely influential texts: in 1859, the first added background on The Agnew Clinic.3 The definitive bi- of what would be six editions of the comprehensive text- ography of Eakins and his works remains Lloyd Goodrich’s book, System of Surgery;7 and in 1861, Manual of Military two-volume Thomas Eakins.4 Surgery, used by both sides in the Civil War. His clinical reputation rested on conservative surgery, the Samuel Gross, MD approach of avoiding amputation, specifically in osteomy- Gross was one of the few elitis.1 If the child survived the acute infection, removal of American physicians with an in- devitalized bone hastened healing and allowed the regenera- ternational reputation.5 He was tion of the remaining bone, thereby preserving a functional brought up on a Pennsylvania limb.7 This was the operation that Eakins portrayed in The Dutch farm near the Lehigh Gross Clinic.1 When antibiotic therapy cured osteomyelitis Valley town of Easton. He at- without surgery, conservative surgery became obsolete. tended school in a log cabin, and Gross led the American Surgical Association in 1880, read the Old Testament. After the first professional organization in the U.S. devoted a frustrating experience trying to the advancement of surgical science. He was its first to learn medicine from one of president.1 Today, the association continues as the leading Easton’s practitioners, he ab- academic forum in the field. sorbed himself in study at pri- Samuel D. Gross, MD, circa D. Hayes Agnew, MD 1875. PD-US-expired vate academies in Wilkes-Barre and Lawrenceville, New Jersey. Thirteen years junior to Gross, He discovered an aptitude for languages, polishing his D. Hayes Agnew was also in German and English, then mastered Latin, Greek, French, Philadelphia, at the University of and enough Italian to read technical articles. After an Pennsylvania School of Medicine. unsatisfying apprenticeship under an indifferent doctor, In contrast to Gross’ modest Gross enrolled at Jefferson Medical College in 1826 as a background, Agnew’s family was student in its inaugural class.6 prominent in Lancaster County, From the beginning of his career, Gross was devoted Pennsylvania, able to trace its to academic publication. During his first years in practice lineage through four centuries of he translated texts on anatomy, obstetrics, typhus, and landed gentry in Scotland to 13th operative surgery from the original French and German, century French nobility.8 and authored a text on the diseases of bones and joints. At 18-years old Agnew at- D. Hayes Agnew, MD, circa Dissatisfied with his practice in Easton, in 1833 Gross found tended medical school at Penn 1890. PD-US-expired work in Cincinnati, first at the Medical College of Ohio, following in the footsteps of his then two years later at the short-lived Medical Department father, also a physician and Penn graduate. In 1848, he taught of the Cincinnati College as chair of pathological anatomy. at the Philadelphia School of Anatomy, a private facility.8 Passionate in his study of anatomy, he spent hours every He joined the University of Pennsylvania in 1862, at- day dissecting both normal and diseased bodies. At both taining the top rank as professor of surgery in 1871. He Easton and Cincinnati, he received specimens and bodies published the textbook, Principles and Practice of Surgery, from colleagues who knew of his interest. He published that had two editions—1878 and 1889. his findings in 1839 in the two-volume work, Elements of At the apex of his career Agnew was called as the lead Pathological Anatomy, the first work on morbid anatomy consultant to assist in the care of U.S. President James A. in English. Immediately popular, Gross’s text went into Garfield after he was shot in the flank on July 2, 1881. In the three editions before it was made obsolete by the develop- early morning hours of July 4, a special train sped Agnew ment of microscopic pathology in the 1850s.6 from Philadelphia to Union Station in record time.8 The A national and international figure at 34 years of age, President, in hypovolemic shock, had undergone repeated 14 The Pharos/Winter 2019 probing of his wound for the bullet by his primary surgeon, dissections, and surgical opera- the surgeon general of the Navy, then by both Agnew and tions, including some by Gross. his fellow consultant, Frank Hamilton of New York. The He likely did the same at group decided not to operate after Garfield appeared to Parisian medical schools when rally later that evening.8 he was at the École des Beaux- The President began to die a slow, agonizing death from Arts from 1865 to 1869. When sepsis, two subsequent operations doing little to slow his he returned stateside in 1870, he deterioration. Death came on September 19, 1881, two-and- was a prosector at the Academy a-half months after he was shot. Postmortem examination under another Jefferson sur- found a ruptured splenic aneurysm as the terminal event. geon, William W. Keen (AΩA, Thomas Eakins, Self-Portrait, The bullet was nearby, encysted, adjacent to a non-healed Sidney Kimmel Medical College, 1902. National Academy Museum, New York fracture of the first lumbar vertebra. Pus had tracked from 1903, Honorary).1 there through the retroperitoneum to the groin.8 For Eakins, knowledge of anatomy was as essential to Daily bulletins on Garfield’s condition were on the front painting as it was to surgery. “To draw the human figure,” pages of both the lay press and the medical newsletters.8 he said, “it is necessary to know as much as possible about Fascinated by the drama of a President’s life in the balance, it, about its structure and its movements, its bones and the public became familiar with arcane medical jargon. muscles, how they are made, and how they act.” 1 The debate intensified after Garfield died. Were the His career had a slow start. He saw opportunity when President’s wounds necessarily fatal? Was his care botched? plans for a world’s fair in Philadelphia were announced, Charles Guiteau, Garfield’s assassin, and his attorneys tried to a celebration of the 1876 centennial of the Declaration of take advantage of the second-guessing.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Review Essay: Grappling with “Big Painting”: Akela Reason‟S Thomas Eakins and the Uses of History
    Review Essay: Grappling with “Big Painting”: Akela Reason‟s Thomas Eakins and the Uses of History Adrienne Baxter Bell Marymount Manhattan College Thomas Eakins made news in the summer of 2010 when The New York Times ran an article on the restoration of his most famous painting, The Gross Clinic (1875), a work that formed the centerpiece of an exhibition aptly named “An Eakins Masterpiece Restored: Seeing „The Gross Clinic‟ Anew,” at the Philadelphia Museum of Art.1 The exhibition reminded viewers of the complexity and sheer gutsiness of Eakins‟s vision. On an oversized canvas, Eakins constructed a complex scene in an operating theater—the dramatic implications of that location fully intact—at Jefferson Medical College in Philadelphia. We witness the demanding work of the five-member surgical team of Dr. Samuel Gross, all of whom are deeply engaged in the process of removing dead tissue from the thigh bone of an etherized young man on an operating table. Rising above the hunched figures of his assistants, Dr. Gross pauses momentarily to describe an aspect of his work while his students dutifully observe him from their seats in the surrounding bleachers. Spotlights on Gross‟s bloodied, scalpel-wielding right hand and his unnaturally large head, crowned by a halo of wiry grey hair, clarify his mastery of both the vita activa and vita contemplativa. Gross‟s foil is the woman in black at the left, probably the patient‟s sclerotic mother, who recoils in horror from the operation and flings her left arm, with its talon-like fingers, over her violated gaze.
    [Show full text]
  • The Gross Clinic, the Agnew Clinic, and the Listerian Revolution
    Thomas Jefferson University Jefferson Digital Commons Department of Surgery Gibbon Society Historical Profiles Department of Surgery 11-1-2011 The Gross clinic, the Agnew clinic, and the Listerian revolution. Caitlyn M. Johnson, B.S. Thomas Jefferson University Charles J. Yeo, MD Thomas Jefferson University Pinckney J. Maxwell, IV, MD Thomas Jefferson University Follow this and additional works at: https://jdc.jefferson.edu/gibbonsocietyprofiles Part of the History of Science, Technology, and Medicine Commons, and the Surgery Commons Let us know how access to this document benefits ouy Recommended Citation Johnson, B.S., Caitlyn M.; Yeo, MD, Charles J.; and Maxwell, IV, MD, Pinckney J., "The Gross clinic, the Agnew clinic, and the Listerian revolution." (2011). Department of Surgery Gibbon Society Historical Profiles. Paper 33. https://jdc.jefferson.edu/gibbonsocietyprofiles/33 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Jefferson Digital Commons. The Jefferson Digital Commons is a service of Thomas Jefferson University's Center for Teaching and Learning (CTL). The Commons is a showcase for Jefferson books and journals, peer-reviewed scholarly publications, unique historical collections from the University archives, and teaching tools. The Jefferson Digital Commons allows researchers and interested readers anywhere in the world to learn about and keep up to date with Jefferson scholarship. This article has been accepted for inclusion in Department of Surgery Gibbon Society Historical Profiles yb an authorized administrator of the Jefferson Digital Commons. For more information, please contact: [email protected]. Brief Reports Brief Reports should be submitted online to www.editorialmanager.com/ amsurg.(Seedetailsonlineunder‘‘Instructions for Authors’’.) They should be no more than 4 double-spaced pages with no Abstract or sub-headings, with a maximum of four (4) references.
    [Show full text]
  • Cardiac Surgery
    Gerhard Ziemer Axel Haverich Editors Cardiac Surgery Operations on the Heart and Great Vessels in Adults and Children 123 Cardiac Surgery Gerhard Ziemer Axel Haverich Editors Cardiac Surgery Operations on the Heart and Great Vessels in Adults and Children Editors Gerhard Ziemer Axel Haverich Department of Surgery HTTG - Surgery The University of Chicago Medizinische Hochschule Hannover Chicago, IL Hannover USA Germany ISBN 978-3-662-52670-5 ISBN 978-3-662-52672-9 (eBook) DOI 10.1007/978-3-662-52672-9 Library of Congress Control Number: 2017939170 © Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2017 This work is subject to copyright. All rights are reserved by the Publisher, whether the whole or part of the material is concerned, specifically the rights of translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on microfilms or in any other physical way, and transmission or information storage and retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology now known or hereafter developed. The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, service marks, etc. in this publication does not imply, even in the absence of a specific statement, that such names are exempt from the relevant protective laws and regulations and therefore free for general use. The publisher, the authors and the editors are safe to assume that the advice and information in this book are believed to be true and accurate at the date of publication. Neither the publisher nor the authors or the editors give a warranty, express or implied, with respect to the material contained herein or for any errors or omissions that may have been made.
    [Show full text]
  • Print This Article
    COPAS—Current Objectives of Postgraduate American Studies Issue 17.1 (2016) “Modern Medicine Had to Start Somewhere:” Performing Health and White Privilege in The Knick Claudia Trotzke ABSTRACT: This essay examines the interrelations of health and white privilege in the U.S.- American historical and medical drama The Knick (2014-). Employing a broad definition of health and drawing from performance studies, this article argues that the everyday life within the series depicts a racist society, while the television series itself with its rhetoric of modernity and visual strategies makes white privilege visible in the context of health. The television series and everyday life within the show are examined in regard to their performative dimensions, i.e. both levels of performance do not merely represent, but take an active part in defining health and its surrounding discourses. KEYWORDS: White Privilege, Health, Medicine, Performance Studies, Modernity, The Knick Setting the Stage: Performing Health and White Privilege Health has always been a highly-discussed topic in U.S.-American culture and politics, as, for instance, a historical overview of universal health care and health care politics on the website of the White House demonstrates.1 Still, issues of health have had a particular currency lately due to the health care reform introduced in the form of the Affordable Care Act, which was signed into law in 2010 (see “About the Health Care Law”). Drawing from medical humanities and offering a critical and scholarly engagement with the topic of health and its surrounding discourses, the field of American Studies has recently dealt with many dimensions of health as well.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2012
    BOARD OF TRUSTEES 4 LETTER FROM THE CHAIR 6 A YEAR AT THE MUSEUM 8 Collecting 10 Exhibiting 20 Teaching and Learning 30 Connecting and Collaborating 38 Building 44 Conserving 50 Supporting 54 Staffing and Volunteering 62 CALENDAR OF EXHIBITIONS AND EVENTS 68 FINANCIAL StATEMENTS 72 COMMIttEES OF THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES 78 SUPPORT GROUPS 80 VOLUNTEERS 83 MUSEUM StAFF 86 A REPORT LIKE THIS IS, IN ESSENCE, A SNAPSHOT. Like a snapshot it captures a moment in time, one that tells a compelling story that is rich in detail and resonates with meaning about the subject it represents. With this analogy in mind, we hope that as you read this account of our operations during fiscal year 2012 you will not only appreciate all that has been accomplished at the Philadelphia Museum of Art, but also see how this work has served to fulfill the mission of this institution through the continued development and care of our collection, the presentation of a broad range of exhibitions and programs, and the strengthening of our relationship to the com- munity through education and outreach. In this regard, continuity is vitally important. In other words, what the Museum was founded to do in 1876 is as essential today as it was then. Fostering the understanding and appreciation of the work of great artists and nurturing the spirit of creativity in all of us are enduring values without which we, individually and collectively, would be greatly diminished. If continuity—the responsibility for sustaining the things that we value most—is impor- tant, then so, too, is a commitment to change.
    [Show full text]
  • Ben Franklin Parkway and Independence Mall Patch Programs
    Ben Franklin Parkway and Independence Mall Patch Programs 1 Independence Mall Patch Program Introduction – Philadelphia’s History William Penn, a wealthy Quaker from London earned most of his income from land he owned in England and Ireland. He rented the land for use as farmland even though he could have made much more money renting it for commercial purposes. He considered the rent he collected from the farms to be less corrupt than commercial wealth. He wanted to build such a city made up of farmland in Pennsylvania. As soon as William Penn received charter for Pennsylvania, Penn began to work on his dream by advertising that he would establish, “ A large Towne or City” on the Delaware River. Remembering the bubonic plague in London (1665) and the disastrous fire of 1666, Penn wanted, “ A Greene county Towne, which would never be burnt, and always be wholesome.” In 1681, William Penn announced he would layout a “Large Towne or City in the most convenient place upon the river for health and navigation.” Penn set aside 10,000 acres of land for the Greene townie on the Delaware and he stretched the town to reach the Schuylkill so that the city would face both rivers. He acquired one mile of river frontage on the Schuylkill parallel to those on the Delaware. Thus Philadelphia became a rectangle 1200 acres, stretching 2 miles in the length from east to west between the 3 rivers and 1 mile in the width North and South. William Penn hoped to create a peaceful city. When he arrived in 1682, he made a Great Treaty of Friendship with the Lenni Lenape Indians on the Delaware.
    [Show full text]
  • 0556 JN June Color
    JUNE 1, 2002 Jeffwww.Jefferson.edu NEWS www.JeffersonHospital.org Jefferson Students Teach Underserved Children to Read University Honoring James Bagian, MD, dozen for 2001- Few would disagree that studying Class of 1977, at 178th Commencement 2002. The program and training to be a doctor or other complies with health professional is one very Jefferson’s 178th Annual Federal guidelines tough job. Let’s face it: many of us Commencement will be at 10:30 James P.Bagian, MD, JMC ’77 for work-study couldn’t do it. a.m., Friday, June 7, at the Kimmel funding. Dr. Bagian is well known to the That’s what makes so remarkable Center for the Performing Arts. Every Monday University President Paul C. Jefferson community and beyond the feat of an extraordinarily for his service as evening, several Brucker, MD, will deliver the committed dozen students from a NASA astro- students traveled to Jefferson Medical College (JMC) Convocation and confer all degrees. naut from 1980 Acts of the Apostles and the Jefferson College of Health Thomas J. Nasca, MD, FACP, to 1995. Church at 28th and Senior Vice President for Academic Professions (JCHP). He helped plan Master streets to Every Monday evening for the Affairs and Dean, Jefferson Medical and provide teach children from past academic year, members of the College (JMC), will present Doctor emergency med- 2 to 15 in the group broke from their studies to of Medicine degrees to 221 JMC ical and rescue church basement, spend time teaching young students. support for the site of a homeless underprivileged children at a North James S.
    [Show full text]
  • Department of General Surgery Medical Academy Named After S.I
    Department of General Surgery Medical Academy named after S.I. Georgievskiy, The Federal State Autonomous Educational Establishment of Higher Education “Crimean Federal University named after V.I. Vernadsky” Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation For the 3rd year students The text of the lectures and the minimum amount of knowledge necessary for a understanding of the subject material. Topic: Aseptics & Antiseptics in surgery Authors: prof.Mikhailychenko V.Yu, Starykh A.A. 2015 Aseptics & Antiseptics in surgery History of aseptic and antiseptic Empirical asepsis In ancient times, demons and evil spirits were though to be the causes of pestilence and infections. Hippocrates (460-377 BC), the great healer of his time irrigated wounds with wine or boiled water foreshadowing asepsis. Galen (130-200 A.D.), a Greek that practiced medicine in Rome and was the most distinguished physician after Hippocrates boiled his surgical instruments used in the caring of wounded gladiators. The writing of Hippocrates and Galen were the established authority for many centuries. In the early to mid 1800's, people like Ignaz Semmelweis, Louis Pasteur, and Robert Koch introduced us to the world of microorganisms. Since this time, we have witnessed the invention of the first steam sterilizer (1886), the practice of passive and active immunization, and the use of antibiotics. Today, we practice asepsis and sterile technique based on scientific principles. Infection control, asepsis, body substance, and sterile technique should always be a part of patient care at any level. Joseph Lister (5 April 1827 — 10 February 1912) was a Scottish surgeon who picked up the work of Louis Pasteur and used it to change the success rates of surgery.
    [Show full text]
  • “Just What Was It That Made U.S. Art So Different, So Appealing?”
    “JUST WHAT WAS IT THAT MADE U.S. ART SO DIFFERENT, SO APPEALING?”: CASE STUDIES OF THE CRITICAL RECEPTION OF AMERICAN AVANT-GARDE PAINTING IN LONDON, 1950-1964 by FRANK G. SPICER III Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements For the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Dissertation Adviser: Dr. Ellen G. Landau Department of Art History and Art CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY May, 2009 CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES We hereby approve the thesis/dissertation of Frank G. Spicer III ______________________________________________________ Doctor of Philosophy candidate for the ________________________________degree *. Dr. Ellen G. Landau (signed)_______________________________________________ (chair of the committee) ________________________________________________Dr. Anne Helmreich Dr. Henry Adams ________________________________________________ Dr. Kurt Koenigsberger ________________________________________________ ________________________________________________ ________________________________________________ December 18, 2008 (date) _______________________ *We also certify that written approval has been obtained for any proprietary material contained therein. Table of Contents List of Figures 2 Acknowledgements 7 Abstract 12 Introduction 14 Chapter I. Historiography of Secondary Literature 23 II. The London Milieu 49 III. The Early Period: 1946/1950-55 73 IV. The Middle Period: 1956-59: Part 1, The Tate 94 V. The Middle Period: 1956-59: Part 2 127 VI. The Later Period: 1960-1962 171 VII. The Later Period: 1963-64: Part 1 213 VIII. The Later Period: 1963-64: Part 2 250 Concluding Remarks 286 Figures 299 Bibliography 384 1 List of Figures Fig. 1 Richard Hamilton Just What Is It That Makes Today’s Homes So Different, So Appealing? (1956) Fig. 2 Modern Art in the United States Catalogue Cover Fig. 3 The New American Painting Catalogue Cover Fig.
    [Show full text]
  • Sleep, Sickness, and Spirituality: Altered States and Victorian Visions of Femininity in British and American Art, 1850-1915
    Sleep, Sickness, and Spirituality: Altered States and Victorian Visions of Femininity in British and American Art, 1850-1915 Kimberly E. Hereford A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Washington 2015 Reading Committee: Susan Casteras, Chair Paul Berger Stuart Lingo Program Authorized to Offer Degree: Art History ©Copyright 2015 Kimberly E. Hereford ii University of Washington Abstract Sleep, Sickness, and Spirituality: Altered States and Victorian Visions of Femininity in British and American Art, 1850-1915 Kimberly E. Hereford Chair of the Supervisory Committee: Professor Susan Casteras Art History This dissertation examines representations in art of the Victorian woman in “altered states.” Though characterized in Victorian art in a number of ways, women are most commonly stereotyped as physically listless and mentally vacuous. The images examined show the Victorian female in a languid and at times reclining or supine pose in these representations. In addition, her demeanor implies both emotional and physical depletion, and there is both a pronounced abandonment of the physical and a collapsing effect, as if all mental faculties are withdrawing inward. Each chapter is dedicated to examining one of these distinct but interrelated types of femininity that flourished throughout British and American art from c. 1850 to c. 1910. The chapters for this dissertation are organized sequentially to demonstrate a selected progression of various states of consciousness, from the most obvious (the sleeping woman) to iii the more nuanced (the female Aesthete and the female medium). In each chapter, there is the visual perception of the Victorian woman as having access to otherworldly conditions of one form or another.
    [Show full text]
  • VCU Open 2013 Round #7
    VCU Open 2013 Round 7 Tossups 1. One play by this author features a man with "all the nations of the old world at war in his veins" arriving to sort out the plot in the final act; that character created by him is the American naval captain Hamlin Kearney. This author wrote a play that includes a Moroccan sheikh who kills Christians until stopped by the lady-explorer Cicely Waynflete and the crusty title guide. In another play by this man, Essie is invited to stay in the new home of a man that Judith Anderson hates, after uncle Peter is hanged, and Westerbridge, New Hampshire is sent into a tizzy when Dick Dudgeon is sentenced to death. In another play by him, a chain of murders leads to the death of Pothinus and then, at the hands of Rufio, Ftatateeta, after one title character finds the other between the paws of the Sphinx and then in a rolled-up carpet. This author of Captain Brassbound's Conversion included John Burgoyne as an antagonist in his The Devil's Disciple; those two dramas, along with Caesar and Cleopatra, make up his Three Plays for Puritans. For 10 points, name this playwright of Man and Superman and Pygmalion. ANSWER: George Bernard Shaw [or GBS] 019-13-64-07101 2. Magallis and Damophilus of Enna are particularly blamed for behavior leading to an event of this type by Diodorus Siculus. One of these events was organized by a Syrian man who had entertained party guests by breathing fire and making humorous prophecies about an event of this kind.
    [Show full text]
  • ESSAY REVIEW Thomas Eakins Reconsidered
    ESSAY REVIEW Thomas Eakins Reconsidered Thomas Eakins. By LLOYD GOODRICH. (Cambridge: Published for the National Gallery of Art by Harvard University Press, 1982. Volume I, xvi, 336 p., Volume II, 366 p. Illustrations, chronology, bibliography, index. $90.00.) Thomas Eakins: Artist of Philadelphia. By DARRELL SEWELL. (Philadelphia: Philadelphia Museum of Art, 1982. Catalogue of an exhibition at the Philadelphia Museum of Art and the Museum of Fine Arts, Boston, 1982. xvi, 136 p. Illustrations, checklist. $12.95.) "Thomas Eakins is a difficult subject for the usual biography, because of his objection to having his private life written about," wrote his widow Susan Macdowell Eakins to her grandniece in the 1930s. When the young scholar Lloyd Goodrich brought the manuscript of Thomas Eakins: His Life and Work to her in 1932, she wondered again about so many words on the subject of "a man who did not care to be written about." Goodrich's book, published by the new Whitney Museum of American Art in 1933, now seems like a modest effort, although his claims for Eakins's importance were large and surely the impact of the book was significant. Today, one wonders what Tom and Susie would think of Goodrich's revised biography, now two volumes and almost 700 pages in length, not including a third volume still in the works, containing an up-dated catalogue raisonne. Doubtlessly Eakins himself would be by turns amused, appalled, puzzled and infuriated by this display of research and speculation. Honored in his own day, as he testified, by "misunderstanding, persecution and neglect, enhanced because unsought," Eakins would have to view such belated attention ironically.
    [Show full text]