Federal Register/Vol. 78, No. 150/Monday, August 5, 2013/Notices

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Federal Register/Vol. 78, No. 150/Monday, August 5, 2013/Notices 47488 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 150 / Monday, August 5, 2013 / Notices With certain exceptions, FTA’s Buy On July 1, 2013, FTA made two DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION America requirements prevent FTA separate determinations that Braun from obligating an amount that may be Corporation (Braun) and ElDorado National Highway Traffic Safety appropriated to carry out its program for National-Kansas’ (ElDorado) Administration a project unless ‘‘the steel, iron, and manufacturing processes on incomplete [U.S. DOT Docket No. NHTSA–2013–0085] manufactured goods used in the project Chrysler and Dodge minivans met FTA’s are produced in the United States.’’ 49 Buy America requirements for final Reports, Forms, and Record Keeping U.S.C. 5323(j)(1). For rolling stock assembly.1 These determinations on Requirements procured with FTA funds, this means final assembly activities were made in that ‘‘the cost of components and AGENCY: National Highway Traffic response to formal requests by Braun Safety Administration (NHTSA), DOT. subcomponents produced in the United and ElDorado pursuant to section (c) of ACTION: Request for public comment on States [must] be more than 60 percent of Appendix D to 661.11 (of 49 CFR). the cost of all components of the rolling proposed collection of information. stock; and . final assembly of the Now, FTA has received a request for rolling stock has occurred in the United a Buy America waiver for minivans SUMMARY: Before a Federal agency can States.’’ 49 U.S.C. 5323(j)(2)(C); 49 CFR from the North Front Range collect certain information from the 661.11(a). If, however, FTA determines Metropolitan Planning Organization public, it must receive approval from that ‘‘the steel, iron, and goods (NFRMPO). NFRMPO operates a the Office of Management and Budget produced in the United States are not vanpool (‘‘VanGo’’) program, which has (OMB). Under procedures established produced in a sufficient and reasonably 75 vans with routes connecting, among by the Paperwork Reduction Act of available amount or are not of a others, Fort Collins, Loveland, Greeley, 1995, before seeking OMB approval, satisfactory quality,’’ then FTA may Denver, and Boulder, Colorado. The Federal agencies must solicit public comment on proposed collections of issue a waiver (non-availability waiver). VanGo program carries more than 420 information, including extensions and 49 U.S.C. 5323(j)(2)(B); 49 CFR 661.7(c). commuters daily in the northern reinstatements of previously approved On June 21, 2010, in response to Colorado area at 93 percent occupancy. formal requests from ElDorado National- collections. All of the vanpools in the VanGo This document describes the Kansas (ElDorado) and the Chrysler program carry five to eight passengers. Group LLC (Chrysler), FTA waived its collection of information for which According to NFRMPO, this makes the NHTSA intends to seek OMB approval. Buy America final assembly large 10–15 passenger vans inefficient requirement for minivans and minivan DATES: Comments must be received on and too costly. In a recently issued or before October 4, 2013. chassis after determining through notice request for proposals for minivans, ADDRESSES: You may submit comments and comment that no manufacturer of NFRMPO received no qualified minivans or minivan chassis performed identified by DOT Docket ID Number proposals for vehicles that meet Buy final assembly in the United States. 75 NHTSA–2013–0085 using any of the America requirements for rolling stock FR 35123. following methods: and seat at least seven passengers. Subsequently, on August 3, 2012, Electronic submissions: Go to http:// Therefore, NFRMPO requests that FTA FTA issued a notice in the Federal www.regulations.gov. Follow the on-line Register seeking comments on a request grant a Buy America waiver for its instructions for submitting comments. by the Vehicle Production Group (VPG) procurement of minivans based upon Mail: Docket Management Facility, for FTA to rescind the Buy America non-availability. M–30, U.S. Department of waiver for minivans and minivan The purpose of this notice is to Transportation, 1200 New Jersey chassis. 75 FR 35124. According to VPG, publish NFRMPO request and seek Avenue SE., West Building Ground it was able to manufacture a wheelchair public comment from all interested Floor, Room W12–140, Washington, DC accessible vehicle, the Mobility Vehicle parties in accordance with 49 U.S.C. 20590. 1 (MV–1), substantially similar to a 5323(j)(3)(A). Comments will help FTA Hand Delivery: West Building Ground minivan and in a sufficient quantity that understand completely the facts Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey was, and still is, Buy America compliant surrounding the request, including the Avenue SE., Washington, DC, between 9 with respect to both domestic content effects of a potential waiver and the a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through and final assembly. merits of the request. A full copy of the Friday, except Federal holidays. Fax: 1–202–493–2251. On December 3, 2012, FTA rescinded request has been placed in docket the waiver for minivans and minivan number FTA–2013–0027. Instructions: Each submission must chassis after determining that a blanket include the Agency name and the waiver was no longer necessary. 77 FR Issued on August 1, 2013. Docket number for this Notice. Note that 71676. In this notice, FTA carefully Dorval R. Carter, Jr., all comments received will be posted considered all of the comments received Chief Counsel. without change to http:// by the various stakeholders through the [FR Doc. 2013–18814 Filed 8–2–13; 8:45 am] www.regulations.gov including any United States in order to address BILLING CODE 4910–57–P personal information provided. Please concerns, including the differences see the Privacy Act heading below. between the MV–1’s accessibility Privacy Act: Anyone is able to search features and traditional minivans, the electronic form of all comments inadequate seating capacity when the received into any of our dockets by the vehicles are used for vanpool services, name of the individual submitting the as well as others. FTA determined, comment (or signing the comment, if however, that these concerns could be submitted on behalf of an association, addressed with individual waiver business, labor union, etc.). You may requests on a case-by-case basis as the 1 http://www.fta.dot.gov/legislation_law/ review DOT’s complete Privacy Act need arose and a blanket waiver was no about_FTA_598.html; http://www.fta.dot.gov/ Statement in the Federal Register longer necessary. documents/Imanse_re_Chrysler_Buy_America.pdf. published on April 11, 2000 (65 FR VerDate Mar<15>2010 19:07 Aug 02, 2013 Jkt 229001 PO 00000 Frm 00218 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\05AUN1.SGM 05AUN1 mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 150 / Monday, August 5, 2013 / Notices 47489 19477–78) or you may visit http:// its efforts to reduce traffic injuries and Information—NHTSA estimates that the Docketslnfo.dot.gov. fatalities. Session participation would number of focus group participants will FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. be voluntary and the focus group average 10 per group, and that average Alan Block, Office of Behavioral Safety participants would receive duration per focus group will be 80 Research (NTI–131), National Highway remuneration for their involvement. minutes. Participants will be recruited Traffic Safety Administration, 1200 New Focus group topics will include: by intercept or telephone using a brief Jersey Avenue SE., W46–499, strategic messaging (e.g., slogans or screening questionnaire estimated to Washington, DC 20590. Mr. Block’s advertisement concepts concerning seat take no more than another 10 minutes. belt use, impaired driving, driver phone number is 202–366–6401 and his Therefore, over a three year period, distraction, tire pressure monitoring), email address is [email protected]. NHTSA estimates that the total burden problem identification (e.g., discussions will be 6300 hours (420 focus groups × SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under the with high-risk groups on beliefs, 10 participants × 90 minutes). Total Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, attitudes, driving behaviors, or reactions annual burden will be 2100 hours (140 before an agency submits a proposed to interventions and countermeasures), focus groups × 10 participants × 90 collection of information to OMB for and resource development (e.g., testing minutes). approval, it must publish a document in materials designed to communicate The respondents would not incur any the Federal Register providing a 60-day essential information about traffic safety reporting cost from the information comment period and otherwise consult issues such as vehicle or equipment collection. The respondents also would with members of the public and affected performance rating systems). For each not incur any record keeping burden or agencies concerning each proposed focus group project, NHTSA will submit record keeping cost from the collection of information. The OMB has an individual Information Collection information collection. promulgated regulations describing Request (ICR) to the Office of Authority: 44 U.S.C. Section 3506(c)(2)(A). what must be included in such a Management and Budget (OMB) document. Under OMB’s regulations (at detailing the specific nature and Issued on: July 31, 2013. 5 CFR 1320.8(d)), an agency must ask methodology of planned focus group Jeff Michael, for public comment on the following: sessions prior to any collection activity Associate Administrator, Research and (i) Whether the proposed collection of covered under this generic clearance. Program Development. information is necessary for the proper Description of the Need for the [FR Doc. 2013–18870 Filed 8–2–13; 8:45 am] performance of the functions of the Information and Proposed Use of the BILLING CODE 4910–59–P agency, including whether the Information—NHTSA was established information will have practical utility; by the Highway Safety Act of l970 (23 (ii) the accuracy of the agency’s U.S.
Recommended publications
  • Pdf: 660 Kb / 236
    As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 23, 2017 UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 FORM 20-F (Mark One) ‘ REGISTRATION STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(b) OR (g) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 OR È ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the fiscal year ended: March 31, 2017 OR ‘ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 OR ‘ SHELL COMPANY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 Commission file number: 001-14948 TOYOTA JIDOSHA KABUSHIKI KAISHA (Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter) TOYOTA MOTOR CORPORATION (Translation of Registrant’s Name into English) Japan (Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization) 1 Toyota-cho, Toyota City Aichi Prefecture 471-8571 Japan +81 565 28-2121 (Address of Principal Executive Offices) Nobukazu Takano Telephone number: +81 565 28-2121 Facsimile number: +81 565 23-5800 Address: 1 Toyota-cho, Toyota City, Aichi Prefecture 471-8571, Japan (Name, telephone, e-mail and/or facsimile number and address of registrant’s contact person) Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: Title of Each Class: Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered: American Depositary Shares* The New York Stock Exchange Common Stock** * American Depositary Receipts evidence American Depositary Shares, each American Depositary Share representing two shares of the registrant’s Common Stock. ** No par value. Not for trading, but only in connection with the registration of American Depositary Shares, pursuant to the requirements of the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Motor Vehicle Make Abbreviation List Updated As of June 21, 2012 MAKE Manufacturer AC a C AMF a M F ABAR Abarth COBR AC Cobra SKMD Academy Mobile Homes (Mfd
    Motor Vehicle Make Abbreviation List Updated as of June 21, 2012 MAKE Manufacturer AC A C AMF A M F ABAR Abarth COBR AC Cobra SKMD Academy Mobile Homes (Mfd. by Skyline Motorized Div.) ACAD Acadian ACUR Acura ADET Adette AMIN ADVANCE MIXER ADVS ADVANCED VEHICLE SYSTEMS ADVE ADVENTURE WHEELS MOTOR HOME AERA Aerocar AETA Aeta DAFD AF ARIE Airel AIRO AIR-O MOTOR HOME AIRS AIRSTREAM, INC AJS AJS AJW AJW ALAS ALASKAN CAMPER ALEX Alexander-Reynolds Corp. ALFL ALFA LEISURE, INC ALFA Alfa Romero ALSE ALL SEASONS MOTOR HOME ALLS All State ALLA Allard ALLE ALLEGRO MOTOR HOME ALCI Allen Coachworks, Inc. ALNZ ALLIANZ SWEEPERS ALED Allied ALLL Allied Leisure, Inc. ALTK ALLIED TANK ALLF Allison's Fiberglass mfg., Inc. ALMA Alma ALOH ALOHA-TRAILER CO ALOU Alouette ALPH Alpha ALPI Alpine ALSP Alsport/ Steen ALTA Alta ALVI Alvis AMGN AM GENERAL CORP AMGN AM General Corp. AMBA Ambassador AMEN Amen AMCC AMERICAN CLIPPER CORP AMCR AMERICAN CRUISER MOTOR HOME Motor Vehicle Make Abbreviation List Updated as of June 21, 2012 AEAG American Eagle AMEL AMERICAN ECONOMOBILE HILIF AMEV AMERICAN ELECTRIC VEHICLE LAFR AMERICAN LA FRANCE AMI American Microcar, Inc. AMER American Motors AMER AMERICAN MOTORS GENERAL BUS AMER AMERICAN MOTORS JEEP AMPT AMERICAN TRANSPORTATION AMRR AMERITRANS BY TMC GROUP, INC AMME Ammex AMPH Amphicar AMPT Amphicat AMTC AMTRAN CORP FANF ANC MOTOR HOME TRUCK ANGL Angel API API APOL APOLLO HOMES APRI APRILIA NEWM AR CORP. ARCA Arctic Cat ARGO Argonaut State Limousine ARGS ARGOSY TRAVEL TRAILER AGYL Argyle ARIT Arista ARIS ARISTOCRAT MOTOR HOME ARMR ARMOR MOBILE SYSTEMS, INC ARMS Armstrong Siddeley ARNO Arnolt-Bristol ARRO ARROW ARTI Artie ASA ASA ARSC Ascort ASHL Ashley ASPS Aspes ASVE Assembled Vehicle ASTO Aston Martin ASUN Asuna CAT CATERPILLAR TRACTOR CO ATK ATK America, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft List of Eligible Low-Emission and Energy Efficient Vehicles Using the Hybrid-To-Gasoline Vehicle Comparison Methodology As of December 31, 2017
    Draft List of Eligible Low-Emission and Energy Efficient Vehicles using the Hybrid-to-Gasoline Vehicle Comparison Methodology as of December 31, 2017 This draft list is based on the most recent certification data available to EPA and was developed using the proposed gasoline-to-hybrid comparison methodology. This draft list could change depending on the methodology finalized during the rulemaking process. In addition, the list of eligible vehicles will be expanded as necessary to include additional model years certified by EPA. It is also important to note that an individual state's list may differ from these lists, since the states have the option to increase the stringency of the designated fuel economy percent increase values. States do not have the option to increase the emission standard stringency. In order for a vehicle owner to determine if their particular vehicle would qualify, it is necessary to know the EPA engine family name (also referred to as 'test group name'), which is the unique EPA identifier pointing to the manufacturer's emission certification for that vehicle. This identifier is require to be printed on the emission information label under the hood of every vehicle. CARS Model Year Manufacturer Vehicle Model Engine Family Trans Fuel Economy Guide Class Tier 2/3 Std 2003 Honda Civic Hybrid 3HNXV01.36CV AV Compact Cars B5 2003 Honda Insight 3HNXV01.0PCE AV Two Seaters B5 2004 Honda Civic Hybrid 4HNXV01.37CP AV Compact Cars B5 2004 Honda Insight 4HNXV01.0NCE AV Two Seaters B5 2004 Toyota Prius 4TYXV01.5MC1 AV Midsize
    [Show full text]
  • General Motors (GM) Mulls Contract Manufacturing Partnership for Vans 25-Nov-2015 12:23 GMT News Production Statistics & Forecasts
    General Motors (GM) mulls contract manufacturing partnership for vans 25-Nov-2015 12:23 GMT News Production Statistics & Forecasts Needs to free up production capacity for popular pick-ups General Motors (GM) is reportedly in talks to outsource the production of its Chevrolet Express and GMC Savana cargo vans on contract manufacturing, as the company is looking to free up space at its plants to meet rising demand for pick-ups, reports industry publication Automotive News. Citing a note circulated to GM's workers at the Wentzville, Missouri plant, the news agency suggests that the automaker is "studying a partnership" with Indiana-based AM General to begin production of the cutaway models. "The truck and van continue strong sales … This potential partnership would free up production capacity and allow the organisation to capitalise on our ability to build midsize trucks to further satisfy customer demand", the report stated. Spokespersons at GM and AM General declined to comment on the news. Significance: GM manufactures the Chevrolet Colorado and the Express models, and GMC's Canyon and Savana models at the Wentzville plant for more than a decade, according to IHS Automotive data. The site has come under pressure from high demand for the recently launched Chevrolet Colorado and GMC Canyon pick-up truck. Both the models are seeing sales far outstrip current supply, with the report suggesting that vehicles spend an average of 24 days and 37 days, respectively, at dealers. GM added a third production shift and 750 jobs at its Wentzville plant during September 2014 and made additional production adjustments during May this year.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 77, No. 232/Monday, December 3, 2012
    Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 232 / Monday, December 3, 2012 / Notices 71673 interstate operations, involves Discussion of Comments producing a substantially similar substantial driving on highways on the FMCSA received no comments in this vehicle, the MV–1, in the United States. interstate system and on other roads proceeding. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: built to interstate standards. Moreover, Mary J. Lee at (202) 366–0985 or driving in congested urban areas Conclusion [email protected]. exposes the driver to more pedestrian Based upon its evaluation of the 15 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: and vehicular traffic than exists on exemption applications, FMCSA interstate highways. Faster reaction to exempts Deurice K. Dean (MD), Terry J. I. Background traffic and traffic signals is generally Edwards (MO), Raymundo Flores (TX), The Vehicle Production Group (VPG) required because distances between Charles F. Huffman (WA), Ivaylo V. petitioned the Federal Transit them are more compact. These Kanchev (FL), Charlie C. Kimmel (TX), Administration (FTA) to rescind the conditions tax visual capacity and Laine Lewin (MN), Jimmy R. Mauldin non-availability waiver it issued on June driver response just as intensely as (OK), Johnny Montemayor (TX), 21, 2010 (75 FR 35123). The waiver interstate driving conditions. The Christopher S. Morgan (LA), William T. exempted minivans and minivan veteran drivers in this proceeding have Owens (VA), Jeffrey S. Pennell (VT), chassis from the Buy America final operated CMVs safely under those Donald R. Strickland (NC), Vaughn J. assembly requirement outlined at 49 conditions for at least 3 years, most for Suhling (IL), and Max A. Thurman (IL) CFR part 661, stating that it would much longer.
    [Show full text]
  • GAO-11-745T Department of Energy: Advanced Technology Vehicle
    United States Government Accountability Office Testimony GAO Before the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources, U.S. Senate For Release on Delivery Expected at 9:30 a.m. EDT Thursday, June 9, 2011 DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Advanced Technology Vehicle Loan Program Needs Enhanced Oversight and Performance Measures Statement of Frank Rusco, Director Natural Resources and Environment GAO-11-745T June 9, 2011 DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Accountability • Integrity • Reliability Advanced Technology Vehicle Loan Program Needs Enhanced Oversight and Performance Measures Highlights of GAO-11-745T, a testimony before Committee on Energy and Natural Resources, U.S. Senate Why GAO Did This Study What GAO Found In the Energy Independence and DOE has taken several steps to implement the ATVM program. First, it set Security Act of 2007, Congress three program goals: increase the fuel economy of U.S. passenger vehicles as mandated higher vehicle fuel a whole, advance U.S. automotive technology, and protect taxpayers’ financial economy by model year 2020 and interests. DOE also set technical, financial, and environmental eligibility established the Advanced Technology requirements for applicants. In addition, DOE established criteria for judging Vehicles Manufacturing (ATVM) loan the technical and financial merits of applicants and projects deemed eligible, program in the Department of Energy and policy factors to consider, such as a project’s potential for supporting (DOE). ATVM is to provide up to $25 jobs. DOE established procedures for ATVM staff, aided by experts from billion in loans for more fuel-efficient within and outside DOE, to score applicants and projects. Finally, the Credit vehicles and components. Congress Review Board, composed of senior DOE officials, uses the scores and other also provided $7.5 billion to pay the information to recommend loan decisions to the Secretary of Energy.
    [Show full text]
  • MINUTES of the MEETING of the LOUISIANA MOTOR VEHICLE COMMISSION 3519 12Th Street Metairie, Louisiana 70002 Monday, September 12, 2011
    MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF THE LOUISIANA MOTOR VEHICLE COMMISSION 3519 12th Street Metairie, Louisiana 70002 Monday, September 12, 2011 The meeting was called to order at 10:20 a.m. by Chairman Raymond J. Brandt. Present were: Chairman Raymond J. Brandt Commissioner Troy J. Duhon Commissioner V. Price LeBlanc, Jr. Commissioner John B. Fabre Commissioner John W. Timmons Commissioner James C. “Jim”Hicks Commissioner Joseph W. “Bill” Westbrook Commissioner Maurice C. Guidry Commissioner Alexis D. Hocevar L. A. House, Executive Director Adrian F. LaPeyronnie, III, Counselor Gregory F. Reggie, Counselor Burgess E. McCranie, Jr., Counselor Absent were: Commissioner Brian C. Bent Commissioner Thad J. Ryan, III Commissioner Philip E. Tarver Commissioner Don P. Hargroder Commissioner Donna S. Corley ***************************************************** Also, in attendance were: Victor G. Hassell, Manager of Engineering Services of Sabre Industries Building Systems by CellXion; L. Lodge Webber, Director of Dealership Operations and Seth Weinberg, General Counsel of Vehicle Production Group; Marcus Zervigon of NOLA Motorsports; Jack Fisher and Tony Taylor of Louisiana Sportsman Show; Will Loewer and Audrey L. Courville of Loewer Powersports; Judy McCleary, Lobbiest for RVIA; and Commission staff: Ingya Cattle, Assistant Executive Director; Art Quick, Administrative Supervisor; Administrative Coordinators, Pam Mangin, Sylvia Schwarz, Stacey Broussard, and Jay Williams; and Commission Investigators, Perry Esponge, Joel Aguillard,, Amy Lawson, Wayne Lee, and Ayanna Burton. ***************************************************** The Executive Director reported to the Commission Members that a meeting was held on August 23, 2011 with David Loeb, Esq. and Marcus Zervigon, Director of Sales of NOLA Motorsports Park to discuss their business proposal which would when sold to new motor vehicle dealers would allow prospective customers to test drive high performance cars at their facility.
    [Show full text]
  • Hey, I Know That Guy You Have Never Heard of the Company Or the Product
    20100805-SUPP--0006-NAT-CCI-AN_-- 8/4/2010 11:50 AM Page 1 6 Automotive News Traverse City Daily THURSDAY, AUGUST 5, 2010 Hey, I know that guy You have never heard of the company or the product. But that guy in the photo — didn’t he used to be …? Many of today’s automotive startups include executives with track records at other auto companies. See if you can match each person with his old job and his new job. For example, Henrik Fisker (A) was the designer of the BMW Z8 and Aston Martin DB9 (7) and is now CEO of electric sports car maker Fisker Automotive (t). WHO A. Henrik B. Vic C. Dave D. Gary E. Gilbert F. Don G. Benjamin H. Bob I. William Fisker Doolan Schembri Dodd Passin Runkle Yeung Purcell Santana Li OLD JOB NEW JOB 1. President, Smart USA q. Director, battery maker Boston-Power 2. Manager, Ford’s Amazon project r. President, ZAP electric-car company 3. Chairman, Brilliance China s. CEO, cop car maker Carbon Motors 4. Vice chairman, Delphi t. CEO, electric sports car maker Fisker Automotive 5. President, BMW of North America u. CEO, Vehicle Production Group, maker of vans designed for wheelchairs 6. VP of manufacturing for Toyota plant in Canada v. Setting up Fisker’s retail network 7. Designer of the BMW Z8, Aston Martin DB9 w. CEO, EcoMotors, maker of radically redesigned engines 8. Manager, Toyota’s Kentucky plant x. Tesla manufacturing boss 9. Head of GM’s Advanced Technology Vehicles Group y. Chairman, Hybrid Kinetic Motors; plans $6 billion factory in Alabama For answers, scroll down.
    [Show full text]
  • Transcript Is Being Provided in a Rough Draft Format and May Not Be a Totally Verbatim Record of the Proceedings
    1 This transcript is being provided in a rough draft format and may not be a totally verbatim record of the proceedings. This transcript is not a legal record of the proceedings. 1 2 ---------------------------------------------x 3 NEW YORK CITY TAXI & LIMOUSINE COMMISSION 4 PUBLIC HEARING 5 ---------------------------------------------x 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Held on October 20, 2011 13 33 Beaver Street 14 New York, New York 15 Time: 10:00 a.m. 16 17 18 19 20 21 *************************************************** 22 FIVE STAR REPORTING, INC. 23 90 JOHN STREET, SUITE 411 24 NEW YORK, NEW YORK 10038 25 631.224.5054 2 1 2 A P P E A R A N C E S 3 4 5 COMMISSIONERS: 6 DAVID YASSKY, Chairman 7 NORA CONSTANCE MARINO 8 EDWARD GONZALES 9 LAUVIENSKA POLANCO 10 ELIAS AROUT 11 FRANK CARONE 12 MARK GJONAJ 13 LASHAM DEARCY 14 MEERA JOSHI, General Counsel 15 16 17 SPEAKERS: 18 MICAH KELLNER, Assemblyman 19 OLIVER KOPPELL, Councilman 20 FRED DRASNER, Vehicle Production Group 21 JEAN RYAN, Disabled in Action 22 STEVEN SCHNEIR, Manhattan Motor Cars 23 RONNIE RAYMOND 24 MARCO HENRY, The Yellow Cab Company 25 TERENCE MOAKLEY, United Spinal Association 3 1 2 PATRICK BRENT 3 DARREN AQUINO 4 CHERYL KRIST 5 RICHARD THALER 6 AZA DERMAN 7 EDITH PRATISS 8 JOANNA UNDERWOOD 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 4 1 TLC MEETING 10/20/11 2 CHAIRMAN YASSKY: I will just get started. 3 Good morning. Let me first off thank you for 4 joining us this morning.
    [Show full text]
  • (ATVM) Loan Program: Status and Issues
    The Advanced Technology Vehicles Manufacturing (ATVM) Loan Program: Status and Issues Bill Canis Specialist in Industrial Organization and Business Brent D. Yacobucci Section Research Manager January 15, 2015 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov R42064 The Advanced Technology Vehicles Manufacturing Loan Program: Status and Issues Summary The Advanced Technology Vehicles Manufacturing (ATVM) Loan Program is a Department of Energy (DOE) program designed to reduce petroleum use in vehicles and promote domestic manufacturing. It was established in 2007, when the Detroit 3 automakers—General Motors, Ford, and Chrysler—faced declining sales in a weakening economy at the same time that U.S. fuel economy standards were raised. It provides direct loans to automakers and parts suppliers to construct new U.S. factories or retrofit existing factories to produce vehicles that achieve at least 25% higher fuel economy than model year 2005 vehicles of similar size and performance. The ATVM program is authorized to award up to $25 billion in loans; there is no deadline for completing such loan commitments. Congress funded the program in 2009, when it appropriated $7.5 billion to cover the subsidy cost for the $25 billion in loans, as well as $10 million for program implementation. Since the start of the program, DOE has awarded $8.4 billion in loans to five companies (Fisker, Ford, Nissan, Tesla, and the Vehicle Production Group). As of January 2015, ATVM has $16.6 billion in remaining loan authority. No new loans have been made since 2011. Two companies—Fisker and the Vehicle Production Group—were unable to make payments on their loans, and DOE auctioned the loans off in the fall of 2013.
    [Show full text]
  • 2012 Vehicle Recalls by Manufacturer
    2012 Vehicle Recalls by Manufacturer This analysis should not be interpreted as an indication of what NHTSA thinks of any particular manufacturer or its products. Since these summary numbers do not factor in or weight averages based on production, the largest OEMs tend to top the list each year. These tallies are not used to evaluate manufacturers or to evaluate which recalls the agency may need to investigate or monitor. There are a host of reasons why a manufacturer could have more or fewer recalls in a given year or over time – including, but not limited to, the introduction of new technology, its barometer for measuring risk, which could be more conservative or liberal as contrasted to other manufacturers or the industry as a whole, or other variables. Manufacturer # of Recalls # of Vehicles Recalled TOYOTA MOTOR ENGINEERING & MANUFACTURING 12 5,330,643 HONDA (AMERICAN HONDA MOTOR CO.) 16 3,363,343 GENERAL MOTORS LLC 17 1,476,319 FORD MOTOR COMPANY 24 1,398,837 CHRYSLER GROUP LLC 13 1,334,541 SUBARU OF AMERICA, INC. 4 962,123 BMW OF NORTH AMERICA, LLC 15 561,335 MAZDA NORTH AMERICAN OPERATIONS 2 269,890 HYUNDAI-KIA AMERICA TECHNICAL CENTER INC 5 261,543 KIA MOTORS CORPORATION 3 240,235 NISSAN NORTH AMERICA, INC. 13 215,640 AMERICAN SUZUKI MOTOR CORP. 5 110,908 PORSCHE CARS NORTH AMERICA, INC. 4 22,235 VOLKSWAGEN OF AMERICA, INC 5 15,894 VOLVO CARS OF N.A. LLC. 3 15,379 MERCEDES-BENZ USA, LLC. 6 10,556 JAGUAR LAND ROVER NORTH AMERICA, LLC 4 4,314 DAIMLER TRUCKS NORTH AMERICA 21 137,127 NAVISTAR, INC 20 68,497 BOMBARDIER RECREATIONAL PRODUCTS INC.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft List of Eligible Low-Emission and Energy Efficient Vehicles Using the Hybrid-To-Gasoline Vehicle Comparison Methodology As of August 25, 2015
    Office of Transportation and Air Quality EPA-420-D-15-006a August 31,2015 Draft List of Eligible Low-Emission and Energy Efficient Vehicles using the Hybrid-to-Gasoline Vehicle Comparison Methodology as of August 25, 2015 This draft list is based on the most recent certification data available to EPA and was developed using the proposed gasoline-to-hybrid comparison methodology. This draft list could change depending on the methodology finalized during the rulemaking process. In addition, the list of eligible vehicles will be expanded as necessary to include additional model years certified by EPA. It is also important to note that an individual state's list may differ from these lists, since the states have the option to increase the stringency of the designated fuel economy percent increase values. States do not have the option to increase the emission standard stringency. In order for a vehicle owner to determine if their particular vehicle would qualify, it is necessary to know the EPA engine family name (also referred to as 'test group name'), which is the unique EPA identifier pointing to the manufacturer's emission certification for that vehicle. This identifier is require to be printed on the emission information label under the hood of every vehicle. CARS Model Year Manufacturer Vehicle Model Engine Family Trans Fuel Economy Guide Class Tier 2 Std 2003 Honda Civic Hybrid 3HNXV01.36CV AV Compact Cars B5 2003 Honda Insight 3HNXV01.0PCE AV Two Seaters B5 2004 Honda Civic Hybrid 4HNXV01.37CP AV Compact Cars B5 2004 Honda Insight
    [Show full text]