DOCSLIB.ORG

Co-Housing in the Netherlands

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Co-housing in the Netherlands ‘living with friends as neighbors and neighbors as friends’ By Kat, M. (Mark Kat) Bachelor thesis Geography, Planning and Environment (GPE) Nijmegen School of Management Radboud University Nijmegen June, 2019 ii Colophon Mark Kat [email protected] s4810791 Prof. dr. P.M. Ache Words: 19.971 Bachelor thesis Geography, Planning and Environment (GPE) Nijmegen School of Management Radboud University Nijmegen June, 2019 iii Preface For the most time in my life I have lived in co-housing projects and nowadays I live in a house with other students in Nijmegen. That is why I was became enthusiastic when prof. dr. P.M. Ache asked if I would write a bachelor thesis on co-housing. Due this research I have gained a lot of attention for co-housing in relationship with ageing, as I have never really thought about this relationship before. I always experienced it as a sociable environment to live in but I never really consciously thought about other advantages. I realized that living in a co-housing for seniors could be a great place to age with a lot of neighbors who are willing to help each other and together also tackle the phenomenon of loneliness among the elderly. The writing of the bachelor thesis has been a very enriching experience for my educational level. The struggle I sometimes had during both writing and collecting data has been absolutely instructive to me when I look at it afterwards. I want to thank prof. dr. Ache for his helpful tips for the writing of my thesis. Furthermore, I would like to thank Daan Schipper for all the time he spent with me in the university library and my parents who always helped with clearing my head. iv Summary In this research the concept of co-housing, in relation to the process of ageing, in the Netherlands will be studied. This relevance of this research lies within the ageing societies that western societies are dealing with. Directly after the Second World War a relatively many children were born, labeled as the baby-boom generation. This generation is now at the moment of reaching a certain age at which they are labeled as seniors, being the age of retirement which is around 65. While in 2019 the Netherlands counts 1,3 million inhabitants who are over 75 years old. It is expected that this number will increase till 2,1 million in 2030 (Rijksoverheid, 2019). To the greatest extent this is a qualitative research about the motives that people have to start living in a co-housing project and about the structures that determine how the process of ageing goes. To complete these two elements this research also contains a quantitative part that provides an overview of how co-housing is carried out in the Netherlands. On one hand how co-housing is distributed over the Netherlands and on the other how much of Dutch co-housing lays a focus on the aspect of ageing. The main research question and the research aim are as follows: Main research question - How is the idea of co-housing, especially in relation to ageing, carried out in the Netherlands, and how do the visible structures in co-housing projects have influence on the process of ageing? Research aim - The aim of this research is to give an image on co-housing in the Netherlands in relation to the process of an ageing society. On one hand by providing an overview of co-housing in the Netherlands, for example where, how many and in which forms co-housing projects exists. And on other hand, by closely looking into co-housing projects and providing a deeper look in how the structures in co-housing projects work. The quantitative part of this research has been done with the data of 813 co-housing projects in the Netherlands retrieved from the website of the Cooperative Housing Association. This association provides data on the address, year of foundation, ownership-structure, housing units, age composition and if a certain ideology is being practiced within the community. With the use of the data of the address of all co-housing projects in the Netherlands maps have been made that make the distribution of co-housing in the Netherlands visible. From this maps can be observed that co- housing takes places mainly in medium till big sized cities in the Netherlands, especially in the west of the Netherlands. The location quotient that has been calculated for co-housing in general, intergenerational co-housing and 50+ co-housing shows that the Randstad is a region where relatively, but also absolutely, lots of co-housing projects take place. Utrecht is the province that has the highest location quotient for all three aspects, but Zuid-Holland and Noord-Holland have quite high location quotients. Two provinces which are not part of the Randstad but also have high location quotients are Gelderland and Groningen. Furthermore there are also quite a lot of provinces that have low location quotients for co-housing in general, intergenerational co-housing and 50+ co- housing. The three provinces that have the lowest location quotients are Drenthe, Limburg and Zeeland. Co-housing is not that well distributed in the Netherlands. The other part of the quantitative v part is a descriptive statistical analysis of co-housing in the Netherlands. This part shows that co- housing in the Netherlands to the greatest extend is focused on 50+ residents. Furthermore it shows that there are many differences between co-housing projects in the Netherlands in their size, age composition and ownership-structure. The qualitative part of this research focusses on the motivations and the structures of co-housing projects in the Netherlands. For this part interviews have been done with residents of co-housing projects in the Netherlands which are also on the website of the Cooperative Housing association. With the use of a semi-structured interview guide, so that the respondents could also cite motivations and structures themselves, there has been found that there are multiple motivations for living in a co-housing project, and that both visible and invisible structures are important for the process of ageing in a co-housing project. Important motivations for living in a co-housing project are the possibility to share life with others, supporting and helping each other and the reduction of costs that living with others entails. When looking at the important structures a distinction between visible and invisible structures have been found. The visible structures consist out of the ownership- structure, housing units and age composition. Ownership-structure differs in rent or the buying of a co-housing unit. The amount of housing units can vary from very small sized co-housing projects consisting out of two housing units till very big sized co-housing projects consisting out of 192 housing units. And the age composition can be either intergenerational, in which the residents are from different age categories, or 50+, in which all of the residents are seniors. Furthermore the structures which are not directly visible also have influence on the process of ageing in a co-housing project. These not visible structures mainly are about the character features of the residents who live in the co-housing projects. The human nature is an important element of co-housing as respect, tolerance and the ability to endure are mentioned as important character features to ease the process of ageing. The answers to the main research question and the aim of the research have been found. An answer to the main question would be: The idea of co-housing is still developing in the Netherlands. Even though the foundation rate of new projects has started to descend as the baby-boom generation reached a certain age, there are still new initiatives for co-housing projects. The Dutch government wants to stimulate these initiatives for this form of housing, which will be good for co-housing in the Netherlands. Right now, there are already many projects in all parts of the Netherlands, and lots of these projects are focused on the aspect of ageing. The structures within co-housing projects do have an impact on the process of ageing, but they depend on various wishes of residents if perceived as advantage or disadvantage. With these findings it can be said that the research aim of this research has been achieved as an image on both the overview of co-housing and a close look into co-housing in the Netherlands has been given. vi Table of contents Pre face iv Summary v 1. Introduction 9 1.1 Problem statement 9 1.2 Research aim and questions 10 1.3 Relevance 12 1.3.1 Social relevance 12 1.3.2 Scientific relevance 12 2 Methodology 13 2.1 Research strategy 13 2.1.1 Ontology and epistemology 14 2.1.2 Validity 14 2.1.3 Conceptual framework 14 2.2 Research material 15 3 Theory 18 3.1 The link between ageing and co-housing 18 3.2 Ageing society 18 3.2.1 Age 19 3.3 Problems that an ageing society brings to housing 19 3.4 Co-housing 20 3.5 Co-housing as a suitable housing option for seniors 21 3.6 Co-housing structures 21 3.7 Ownership 22 3.8 Intergenerational co-housing 23 3.9 Dutch co-housing intentions 23 4 Co-housing mapped 24 4.1 Co-housing projects in the Netherlands 25 4.2 Intergenerational co-housing projects in the Netherlands 29 4.3 50+ co-housing projects in the Netherlands 32 5 Descriptive statistical analysis 35 5.1 Co-housing forms 35 5.2 Housing units 36 5.2.1 Housing units of intergenerational co-housing projects 39 5.2.2 Housing units of 50+ co-housing projects 40 5.3 Year of foundation 40 5.3.1 Year of foundation of intergenerational co-housing projects 42 5.3.2 Year of foundation
Recommended publications
  • LEPT Study Tour Amsterdam, Arnhem, Rotterdam 12-14 May 2019

    LEPT Study Tour Amsterdam, Arnhem, Rotterdam 12-14 May 2019

    Facilitating Electric Vehicle Uptake LEPT study tour Amsterdam, Arnhem, Rotterdam 12-14 May 2019 1 Background Organising the study tour The London European Partnership for Transport (LEPT) has sat within the London Councils Transport and Mobility team since 2006. LEPT’s function is to coordinate, disseminate and help promote the sustainable transport and mobility agenda for London and London boroughs in Europe. LEPT works with the 33 London boroughs and TfL to build upon European knowledge and best practice, helping cities to work together to deliver specific transport policies and initiatives, and providing better value to London. In the context of a wider strategy to deliver cleaner air and reduce the impact of road transport on Londoners’ health, one of London Councils’ pledges to Londoners is the upscaling of infrastructures dedicated to electric vehicles (EVs), to facili- tate their uptake. As part of its mission to support boroughs in delivering this pledge and the Mayor’s Transport Strategy, LEPT organised a study tour in May 2019 to allow borough officers to travel to the Netherlands to understand the factors that led the country’s cities to be among the world leaders in providing EV infrastructure. Eight funded positions were available for borough officers working on electric vehicles to join. Representatives from seven boroughs and one sub-regional partnership joined the tour as well as two officers from LEPT and an officer that worked closely on EV charging infrastructure from the London Councils Transport Policy team (Appendix 1). London boroughs London’s air pollution is shortening lives and improving air quality in the city is a priority for the London boroughs.
  • VERSPREIDINGSGEBIED HUIS AAN HUISKRANTEN Regio Noord

    VERSPREIDINGSGEBIED HUIS AAN HUISKRANTEN Regio Noord

    Schiermonnikoog Ameland Eemsmond Terschelling De Marne Dongeradeel Loppersum Appingedam Ferwerderadeel Winsum Delfzijl Bedum Kollummerland C.A. Ten Boer Het Bildt Dantumadeel Zuidhorn Leeuwarderadeel Slochteren Groningen Achtkarspelen Grootegast Vlieland Oldambt Menaldumadeel Tytsjerksteradeel Franekeradeel Leek Menterwolde Harlingen Hoogezand-Sappemeer Haren Leeuwaden Marum Littenseradiel Smallingerland Bellingwedde Tynaarlo Veendam Pekela Texel Noordenveld Opsterland Aa en Hunze Assen Stadskanaal Súdwest-Fryslan Vlagtwedde Ooststellingwerf Heerenveen De Friese Meren Den Helder Borger-Odoorn Weststellingwerf Midden-Drenthe Westerveld Hollands Kroon Schagen Steenwijkerland Emmen Coevorden Meppel De Wolden Hoogeveen Medemblik Opmeer Enk- Stede huizen Noordoostpolder Heerhugo- Broec Langedijk waard Urk Bergen Drechterland Hoorn Staphorst Koggenland Zwartewaterland Hardenberg Heiloo Alkmaar Kampen Castricum Beemster Ommen Zeevang Dalfsen Uitgeest Dronten Zwolle Heemskerk Edam Wormerland Purmerend Lelystad Beverwijk Hattem Twenterand Oldebroek Zaanstad Oost- Lands- zaan meer Tubbergen Velsen Waterland Elburg Heerde Raalte Bloemen- Hellendoorn daal Haarlemmer- Dinkelland liede C.A. Olst-Wijhe Almelo Haarlem Amsterdam Almere Nunspeet Wierden Zand- Zeewolde Harderwijk Epe voort Heem- Borne stede Diemen Oldenzaal Muiden Losser Rijssen-Holten Haarlemmermeer Weesp Hille- Ouder- Naarden Huizen Ermelo Hengelo gom Amstel Deventer Amstel- Blari- veen Bussum Noord- Abcoude cum Putten wijker- Lisse Aalsmeer Laren Eemnes Hof van Twente Enschede hout Bunschoten
  • Infobestand Pelgrimsroute Finsterwolde Palmar

    Infobestand Pelgrimsroute Finsterwolde Palmar

    Infobestand Pelgrimsroute Finsterwolde Palmar. Hoogtekaart Pelgrimsroute; rood is hoog en blauw is laag. Goed te zien is de opeenvolgende inpolderingen. Het land slibt op als de zee vrij spel heeft. Vandaar dat de gebieden richting de zee hoger liggen dan het achterliggend land. Stichting Pelgrimeren in Groningen www.spig.nl SPiG Facebook, E: [email protected] ’t Oldehof 49 9951 JX Winsum KvK 66778166 BTW nr. 8566.94.034 Bankrekening NL25.RBRB.0943.5716.42 Finsterwolde In 1319 wordt Fynserwald voor het eerst genoemd als vestigingsplaats van de Johannietercommanderij te Goldhoorn; in verdrag met het jaartal 1391 is sprake van Finsterwolda en Oostfinsterwolde. In een overeenkomstig verdrag uit 1420 worden 'Ffinsterwolde' en 'Oistfinsterwolde' genoemd. Beide plaatsen waren tot het einde van de vijftiende eeuw zelfstandige kerspelen en worden als zodanig vermeld in een parochielijst van het bisdom Münster, onder de dorpen van het Oldambt. De benamingen in deze lijst zijn waarschijnlijk ouder. De dorpen heten hier Westwinserwalda en Astwinserwalda. Hoewel de naam Finsterwolde vaak wordt verklaard als 'duister, donker woud', vanwege het Hoogduitse woord finster ('duister, somber'), wijzen taalkundigen op het Oudfriese wins(t)era, hetgeen zowel 'links' als 'noordelijk' kan betekenen. De naam zou dan 'links van het moerasbos' of 'noordelijk van het moerasbos' betekenen. Opvallend is de naam van het riviertje Fimell Ee of Fymele Ae, dat in 1391 ook Finser Ee wordt genoemd. Dit watertje ontsprong in met Meerland bij Oostwold en vormde onder de naam Oude Ae de grens met Finsterwolde. Het liep vermoedelijk verder langs het latere eiland Munnikeveen, in de omgeving waarvan het klooster Palmar was gesitueerd, en mondde uit in de Eems bij Fiemel.
  • Local Identities       

    Local Identities       

    Local Identities Editorial board: Prof. dr. E.M. Moormann Prof. dr.W.Roebroeks Prof. dr. N. Roymans Prof. dr. F.Theuws Other titles in the series: N. Roymans (ed.) From the Sword to the Plough Three Studies on the Earliest Romanisation of Northern Gaul ISBN 90 5356 237 0 T. Derks Gods,Temples and Ritual Practices The Transformation of Religious Ideas and Values in Roman Gaul ISBN 90 5356 254 0 A.Verhoeven Middeleeuws gebruiksaardewerk in Nederland (8e – 13e eeuw) ISBN 90 5356 267 2 N. Roymans / F.Theuws (eds) Land and Ancestors Cultural Dynamics in the Urnfield Period and the Middle Ages in the Southern Netherlands ISBN 90 5356 278 8 J. Bazelmans By Weapons made Worthy Lords, Retainers and Their Relationship in Beowulf ISBN 90 5356 325 3 R. Corbey / W.Roebroeks (eds) Studying Human Origins Disciplinary History and Epistemology ISBN 90 5356 464 0 M. Diepeveen-Jansen People, Ideas and Goods New Perspectives on ‘Celtic barbarians’ in Western and Central Europe (500-250 BC) ISBN 90 5356 481 0 G. J. van Wijngaarden Use and Appreciation of Mycenean Pottery in the Levant, Cyprus and Italy (ca. 1600-1200 BC) The Significance of Context ISBN 90 5356 482 9 Local Identities - - This publication was funded by the Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (NWO). This book meets the requirements of ISO 9706: 1994, Information and documentation – Paper for documents – Requirements for permanence. English corrected by Annette Visser,Wellington, New Zealand Cover illustration: Reconstructed Iron Age farmhouse, Prehistorisch
  • Kempengemeenten; Operationeel

    Kempengemeenten; Operationeel

    7 | KEMPENGEMEENTEN ; OPERATIONEEL EN DOORGROEIDISCUSSIE Samenwerking op verschillende terreinen tussen de gemeenten Bergeijk, Bladel, Reusel-De Mierden, Eersel en Oirschot Simon Plasmeijer en Stan van de Laar 7.1 Inleiding en typering Vijf relatief kleine gemeenten in Zuidoost Brabant, te weten Bergeijk, Bladel, Eersel, Oirschot en Reusel-De Mierden, bedienen samen een gebied van circa 85.000 inwoners. Zoals uit tabel 10 valt af te leiden kent iedere gemeente op zich een beperkte schaalomvang met daardoor ieder zo haar eigen kwetsbaarheden. Om toch ‘samen sterk’ te staan vormen deze gemeenten sinds 2003 het samenwerkingsverband Kempengemeenten. Gemeente Inwoneraantal 1 Bergeijk 18.061 Bladel 19.177 Eersel 18.157 Oirschot 17.750 Reusel-De Mierden 12.555 Totaal 85.700 Tabel 10: Inwoneraantallen van de gemeenten die samen ‘Kempengemeenten’ vormen. Op 8 juli 2003 is met een intentieverklaring van de colleges van de vijf betreffende gemeenten bevestigd dat zij streven naar vergaande samenwerking in deze regio. Uiteindelijk heeft het proces dat daarmee in gang werd gezet in 2006 geresulteerd in een lichte gemeenschappelijke regeling. Niet veel later, in 2008, werd echter al geconstateerd dat enerzijds deze afspraken onvoldoende de wensen van de samenwerkende gemeenten dekten en anderzijds de behoefte aan niet vrijblijvende samenwerking alweer op een hoger niveau was gekomen. Na een periode van evaluatie en visievorming resulteerde deze constatering begin 2010 concreet in een versterking van de samenwerking in de vorm van een gemeenschappelijke regeling. Formeel werd deze nieuwe opzet bekrachtigd op 19 januari 2010 door ondertekening door de vijf colleges van B&W. 1 Centraal Bureau voor de Statistiek, Statline, gegevens per 1 januari 2010.
  • Uitkomsten Onderzoek Snelfietsroute Ijsselstein, April 2020

    Uitkomsten Onderzoek Snelfietsroute Ijsselstein, April 2020

    Resultaten Onderzoek snelfietsfietsroute In opdracht van: Gemeente IJsselstein & Provincie Utrecht Contactpersoon: Arnoud Egbers Utrecht, april 2020 Postbus 681 3500 AR Utrecht Telefoon: 030 263 10 80 e-mail: [email protected] website: www.duomarketresearch.nl Onderzoek snelfietsroute INHOUDSOPGAVE 1 ACHTERGROND EN ONDERWERPEN ONDERZOEK ............................................................... 3 2 ONDERZOEKSOPZET .......................................................................................................... 4 3 RESULTATEN ..................................................................................................................... 5 3.1 Belangrijke aspecten doorgaande langere fietsroute .................................................... 5 3.2 Gebruik doorgaande langere fietsroute ....................................................................... 6 3.3 Gebruik doorgaande langere fietsroute ....................................................................... 7 3.4 Oordeel tracé 1: Paardenbaan .................................................................................... 8 3.5 Oordeel tracé 2: Touwlaan ....................................................................................... 10 3.6 Oordeel tracé 3: Beneluxweg ................................................................................... 12 3.7 Oordeel tracé 4: Baronieweg .................................................................................... 14 3.8 Startpunt en eindpunt route in IJsselstein ................................................................
  • Curriculum Vitae

    Curriculum Vitae

    Curriculum Vitae Frans J.G. Padt, Ph.D. September 2020 Current position Teaching Professor of Agricultural Economics, Sociology, and Education The Pennsylvania State University 214 Armsby Building University Park, PA 16801, U.S.A. Office phone: 814-863-8655 Fax: 814-865-3746 E-mail: [email protected] Education 2007, Ph.D. Department of Social and Political Sciences of the Environment, Radboud University Nijmegen (the Netherlands). 1988, M.Sc. Faculty of Earth Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (the Netherlands), M.Sc. in Environmental Hydrology. Minor in Meteorology. Academic career 2011 - present Teaching Professor, The Pennsylvania State University, USA (since 2019). Senior Lecturer/Associate Teaching Professor of Agricultural Economics, Sociology, and Education and Landscape Architecture (2011 - 2018). 2009 - 2010 Senior Researcher Governance and Spatial Planning, Alterra Landscape Centre, Wageningen University and Research Centre, the Netherlands. 2004 - 2009 Lecturer and Researcher, Department of Political Sciences of the Environment, Radboud University Nijmegen, the Netherlands. Professional Career 1999 – 2004 Consultant and project leader, Center for Agriculture and Environment (CLM, Culemborg, the Netherlands). 1992 – 1998 Soil Conservation Planner, Department of Environmental Planning, Province of Flevoland. 1988 – 1991 Soil and Water Specialist, Department of Environment and Water, Province of Gelderland. Page !1 of 8! The Pennsylvania State University Courses Current: • CED 309 - Land Use Dynamics. • CED 409 - Land Use Planning and Procedure. • CED 327 - Society and Natural Resources. • CEDEV 500 - Community and Economic Development: Theory and Practice. • CEDEV 509 - Population, Land Use, and Municipal Finance. Past: • Landscape Architecture Studios Regional Planning & Landscape Systems and Site & Community Design. • Design Theory Seminars. • Research and Writing in Landscape Architecture. • CED 155 - Science, Technology and Public Policy.
  • Title: Study Visit Energy Transition in Arnhem Nijmegen City Region And

    Title: Study Visit Energy Transition in Arnhem Nijmegen City Region And

    Title: Study Visit Energy Transition in Arnhem Nijmegen City Region and the Cleantech Region Together with the Province of Gelderland and the AER, ERRIN Members Arnhem Nijmegen City Region and the Cleantech Region are organising a study visit on the energy transition in Gelderland (NL) to share and learn from each other’s experiences. Originally, the study visit was planned for October 31st-November 2nd 2017 but has now been rescheduled for April 17-19 2018. All ERRIN members are invited to participate and can find the new programme and registration form online. In order to ensure that as many regions benefit as possible, we kindly ask that delegations are limited to a maximum of 3 persons per region since there is a maximum of 20 spots available for the whole visit. Multistakeholder collaboration The main focus of the study visit, which will be organised in cooperation with other interregional networks, will be the Gelders’ Energy agreement (GEA). This collaboration between local and regional industries, governments and NGOs’ in the province of Gelderland, Netherlands, has pledged for the province to become energy-neutral by 2050. It facilitates a co-creative process where initiatives, actors, and energy are integrated into society. a A bottom-up approach The unique nature of the GEA resides in its origin. The initiative sprouted from society when it faced the complex, intricate problems of the energy transition. The three initiators were GNMF, the Gelders’ environmental protection association, het Klimaatverbond, a national climate association and Alliander, an energy network company. While the provincial government endorses the project, it is not a top-down initiative.
  • Projectgebied Keersop

    Projectgebied Keersop

    G E M B E R G E I J K 151500 152000 152500 153000 153500 154000 154500 155000 155500 156000 156500 157000 157500 158000 158500 159000 Projectgebied Keersop: een archeologische en cultuurhistorische verwachtingskaart: update Gemeenten Bergeijk en Valkenswaard Advieskaart 375500 RAAP-rapport 3384, kaartbijlage 3, schaal 1:10.000 Stevert 375500 legenda archeologische verwachting categorie advies L i e s e n d e H u i s v e n droge landschappen 't Geveltje G a g e l v e l d e n Dehoge Mast verwachting: gebied van zeer hoge archeologische 1 De wettelijke bescherming verbiedt hier de meeste bodemverstorende activiteiten, tenzij de waarde, beschermd (archeologisch monument) Minister van OC&W of het College van B&W van de gemeente hiervoor vooraf vergunning verleent. Z a n d b o g t e n hoge verwachting: gebied van archeologische waarde 2 Archeologisch onderzoek vereist bij bodemingrepen en te bebouwen oppervlakten (archeologisch monument) van projectgebieden die groter zijn dan 100 m² en dieper gaan dan 0,3 m onder maaiveld. hoge verwachting: historische kern 3 Vergunning vereist bij bodemingrepen en te bebouwen oppervlakten van projectgebieden die K e e r s o p groter zijn dan 250 m² en dieper gaan dan 0,3 m onder maaiveld. hoge verwachting 4 Archeologisch onderzoek vereist bij bodemingrepen en te bebouwen oppervlakten die groter zijn dan 500 m² E i n d e r h e i d e en dieper gaan dan 0,3 m onder maaiveld of 0,5 m onder maaiveld bij esdek en agrarisch bestemde gronden.
  • Toolbox Results East-Groningen the Netherlands

    Toolbox Results East-Groningen the Netherlands

    Customer needs Target group Transport challenge for the East-Groningen Region, Municipality Oldambt May 2012 WP 3 Cartoon by E.P. van der Wal, Groningen Translation: The sign says: Bus canceled due to ‘krimp’ (shrinking of population) The lady comments: The ónly bus that still passes is the ‘ideeënbus’ (bus here meaning box, i.e. a box to put your ideas in) Under the cartoon it says: Inhabitants of East-Groningen were asked to give their opinion This report was written by Attie Sijpkes OV-bureau Groningen Drenthe P.O. Box 189 9400 AD Assen T +31 592 396 907 M +31 627 003 106 www..ovbureau.nl [email protected] 2 Table of content Customer Needs ...................................................................................................................................... 4 Target group selection and description .................................................................................................. 8 Transportation Challenges .................................................................................................................... 13 3 Customer Needs Based on two sessions with focus groups, held in Winschoten (Oldambt) on April 25th 2012. 1 General Participants of the sessions on public transport (PT) were very enthusiastic about the design of the study. The personal touch and the fact that their opinion is sought, was rated very positively. The study paints a clear picture of the current review of the PT in East Groningen and the ideas about its future. Furthermore the research brought to light a number of specific issues and could form a solid foundation for further development of future transport concepts that maintains the viability and accessibility of East Groningen. 2 Satisfaction with current public transport The insufficient supply of PT in the area leads to low usage and low satisfaction with the PT network.
  • Indeling Van Nederland in 40 COROP-Gebieden Gemeentelijke Indeling Van Nederland Op 1 Januari 2019

    Indeling Van Nederland in 40 COROP-Gebieden Gemeentelijke Indeling Van Nederland Op 1 Januari 2019

    Indeling van Nederland in 40 COROP-gebieden Gemeentelijke indeling van Nederland op 1 januari 2019 Legenda COROP-grens Het Hogeland Schiermonnikoog Gemeentegrens Ameland Woonkern Terschelling Het Hogeland 02 Noardeast-Fryslân Loppersum Appingedam Delfzijl Dantumadiel 03 Achtkarspelen Vlieland Waadhoeke 04 Westerkwartier GRONINGEN Midden-Groningen Oldambt Tytsjerksteradiel Harlingen LEEUWARDEN Smallingerland Veendam Westerwolde Noordenveld Tynaarlo Pekela Texel Opsterland Súdwest-Fryslân 01 06 Assen Aa en Hunze Stadskanaal Ooststellingwerf 05 07 Heerenveen Den Helder Borger-Odoorn De Fryske Marren Weststellingwerf Midden-Drenthe Hollands Westerveld Kroon Schagen 08 18 Steenwijkerland EMMEN 09 Coevorden Hoogeveen Medemblik Enkhuizen Opmeer Noordoostpolder Langedijk Stede Broec Meppel Heerhugowaard Bergen Drechterland Urk De Wolden Hoorn Koggenland 19 Staphorst Heiloo ALKMAAR Zwartewaterland Hardenberg Castricum Beemster Kampen 10 Edam- Volendam Uitgeest 40 ZWOLLE Ommen Heemskerk Dalfsen Wormerland Purmerend Dronten Beverwijk Lelystad 22 Hattem ZAANSTAD Twenterand 20 Oostzaan Waterland Oldebroek Velsen Landsmeer Tubbergen Bloemendaal Elburg Heerde Dinkelland Raalte 21 HAARLEM AMSTERDAM Zandvoort ALMERE Hellendoorn Almelo Heemstede Zeewolde Wierden 23 Diemen Harderwijk Nunspeet Olst- Wijhe 11 Losser Epe Borne HAARLEMMERMEER Gooise Oldenzaal Weesp Hillegom Meren Rijssen-Holten Ouder- Amstel Huizen Ermelo Amstelveen Blaricum Noordwijk Deventer 12 Hengelo Lisse Aalsmeer 24 Eemnes Laren Putten 25 Uithoorn Wijdemeren Bunschoten Hof van Voorst Teylingen
  • Historisch Onderzoek Nen5725 Gelriaweg 16 Te Epe

    Historisch Onderzoek Nen5725 Gelriaweg 16 Te Epe

    HISTORISCH ONDERZOEK NEN5725 GELRIAWEG 16 TE EPE VMI GROUP EPE 21 juli 2014 077998780:A B03203.000018.0100 Historisch onderzoek NEN5725 Gelriaweg 16 te Epe Inhoud 1 Inleiding, doel en probleemstelling ................................................................................................................. 3 2 Bodemgebruik ...................................................................................................................................................... 5 2.1 Voormalige bodemgebruik ....................................................................................................................... 5 2.2 Huidige bodemgebruik ............................................................................................................................. 5 2.3 Toekomstig bodemgebruik....................................................................................................................... 5 3 Bestaande bodeminformatie .............................................................................................................................. 6 3.1 Bodemopbouw en geologie ...................................................................................................................... 6 3.2 bodemkwaliteitskaart ................................................................................................................................ 6 3.3 Asbestkaart ................................................................................................................................................