Hastings Environmental Law Journal Volume 10 Article 3 Number 2 Spring 2004 1-1-2004 A Brief Examination of the History of Persistent Debate About Limits to Western Growth A. Dan Tarlock Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.uchastings.edu/ hastings_environmental_law_journal Part of the Environmental Law Commons Recommended Citation A. Dan Tarlock, A Brief Examination of the History of Persistent Debate About Limits to Western Growth, 10 Hastings West Northwest J. of Envtl. L. & Pol'y 155 (2004) Available at: https://repository.uchastings.edu/hastings_environmental_law_journal/vol10/iss2/3 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at UC Hastings Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Hastings Environmental Law Journal by an authorized editor of UC Hastings Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact
[email protected]. WEST NORTHWEST I. Introduction A persistent theme in the history of the American West is of the question of what limits, if any, the region’s arid and semiarid climates and harsh landscapes impose on sustainable human settle- ment. As Carry McWilliams noted in his pioneering eco-history of the Los Angeles A Brief Examination of the basin, “the region is a paradox: a desert History of the Persistent that faces an ocean.”1 Many Westerners Debate About Limits have long recognized the problems of to Western Growth putting people in generally warm, but not naturally well-watered areas with poor soils. But, for over a century and one-half, By A. Dan Tarlock* the West has resoundingly answered the limits question, no; there are no climatic or landscape limits on our growth! To settle the West, its promoters harked back to the book of Genesis rather than the Hebrew prophets.