DOCSLIB.ORG

The US Visa Waiver Program Facilitating Travel and Enhancing Security the US Visa Waiver Program: Facilitating Travel and Enhancing Security

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The US Visa Waiver Program Facilitating Travel and Enhancing Security the US Visa Waiver Program: Facilitating Travel and Enhancing Security Research Paper Ruth Ellen Wasem International Security Department & US and the Americas Programme October 2017 The US Visa Waiver Program Facilitating Travel and Enhancing Security The US Visa Waiver Program: Facilitating Travel and Enhancing Security Summary • The US Visa Waiver Program (VWP) has changed substantially over the past 30 years. It originated in 1986 as a pilot public diplomacy initiative to facilitate tourism and reciprocity of travel among countries friendly with the US. Since 9/11 the US has leveraged participation in the VWP to gain intelligence to fight terrorism. • VWP admissions make up a significant portion of the tourists and business visitors who come to the US each year. The number of VWP entrants increased by 71 per cent over 20 years, from 12.4 million in FY1996 to 21.2 million in FY2015. • The travel industry’s research on the effects of visa facilitation – and of the VWP in particular – shows it yields positive results. The head of the US Travel Association stated in 2015 that the 20.3 million visitors who came to the US in 2014 through the VWP generated $190 billion in economic output and supported nearly 1 million jobs in the US. • Weighing the benefits of the VWP to travellers and to the US travel industry against the risks of individuals who pose a threat to national security arriving in the country is no small matter. Critics make the case that the VWP is a major national security vulnerability regardless of the modest economic boost that VWP travellers provide. Supporters of the VWP warn that efforts to scale it back or tighten up the requirements would jeopardize international cooperation in the fight against terrorism with US allies, notably those in Europe. • The VWP is not an especially partisan issue; it has supporters and detractors on both sides of the aisle. Its economic and public diplomacy value has long been recognized. When it was perceived as a national security vulnerability after the 9/11 attacks, policymakers used the VWP’s popularity to require biometric passports and to leverage greater sharing of intelligence from participating countries. • Arguably, the value of a national security screening process is dependent on the depth and breadth of the intelligence data. Thus, the relationship between the two dimensions of the VWP has become symbiotic. 1 | Chatham House The US Visa Waiver Program: Facilitating Travel and Enhancing Security Introduction The US Visa Waiver Program (VWP) has changed substantially over the past 30 years. It originated in 1986 as a pilot public diplomacy initiative to facilitate tourism and reciprocity of travel among countries friendly with the US. Since the events of 11 September 2001, the US has leveraged participation in the VWP to gain intelligence to fight terrorism. This has included an increased emphasis on document integrity, an expansion of intelligence sharing, and the establishment of the Electronic System for Travel Authorization (ESTA) for all VWP travellers. Currently, 38 countries participate in the VWP.1 VWP participating countries • Andorra • France • Lithuania • Slovakia • Australia • Germany • Luxembourg • Slovenia • Austria • Greece • Malta • South Korea • Belgium • Hungary • Monaco • Spain • Brunei • Iceland • Netherlands • Sweden • Chile • Ireland • New Zealand • Switzerland • Czech Republic • Italy • Norway • Taiwan • Denmark • Japan • Portugal • UK • Estonia • Latvia • San Marino • Finland • Liechtenstein • Singapore The European Union (EU) is concerned that the US does not include all EU member states in the VWP: Bulgaria, Croatia, Cyprus, Poland and Romania have not yet been admitted. In contrast, US citizens are permitted to travel to all the EU member states for short-term business or tourism without a visa. Criteria for participating in the VWP The long-standing criteria for participating in the VWP are that a country must: offer reciprocal privileges to US citizens; have had a non-immigrant visa refusal rate of less than 3 per cent for the previous year; issue its nationals with machine-readable passports that incorporate biometric identifiers; certify that it is working towards issuing tamper-resistant, machine-readable visa documents that incorporate biometric identifiers that are verifiable at the country’s port of entry; and not compromise the law enforcement or security interests of the US by its inclusion in the VWP. More recent criteria are that a participating country must use the INTERPOL Stolen and Lost Travel Document database to screen travellers crossing a VWP country’s borders, and agree to share certain intelligence information, issue e-passports to all VWP travellers coming to the US, and expand the use of US federal air marshals on international flights from participating countries to the US.2 1 Argentina joined in 1996, but was suspended in December 2001 because of the economic collapse in the country. Uruguay participated from 1999 until 2003. 2 Department of Homeland Security (2015), ‘Statement by Secretary Jeh C. Johnson on Intention to Implement Security Enhancements to the Visa Waiver Program’, 6 August 2015. 2 | Chatham House The US Visa Waiver Program: Facilitating Travel and Enhancing Security In response to the terrorist attacks in Paris in November 2015, the administration of President Barack Obama sought to increase the security of the VWP. Changes included modifying ESTA to try to capture information regarding the prospective traveller’s past travel to countries ‘constituting a terrorist safe haven’. The Departments of Homeland Security and of Justice were required to report to the president on, among other things, information sharing with VWP countries, identification of VWP countries that are ‘deficient in key areas of cooperation’, and possible pilot schemes to collect and use biometric data on VWP travellers.3 We must continue our proactive approach to security, while not negatively impacting the free flow of legitimate travelers to this country. The proposed security enhancements to the Visa Waiver Program … represent reasonable security measures that will help combat the threat of terror and, if thoughtfully employed, will help us reach our mutual goals of being effective and efficient with our travel security programs. Michael Chertoff (Secretary of Homeland Security, 2005–09), USA Today, 25 August 2015 In December 2015 the US Congress enacted statutory changes to prohibit people who had been present in certain countries since 1 March 2011 from travelling under the VWP. The specified countries include any designated by the US government as having repeatedly provided support for acts of international terrorism under any provision of law, or any other country or area of concern deemed appropriate by the Secretary of Homeland Security. The designated countries are Iran, Iraq, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria and Yemen. In addition, the Visa Waiver Program Improvement and Terrorist Travel Prevention Act of 2015 made anyone who is a dual national of a participating country and one of these specified countries ineligible to travel under the VWP.4 Trends in usage of the VWP5 VWP admissions make up a significant portion of the tourists and business visitors who come to the US each year. The number of VWP entrants increased by 71 per cent over 20 years, from 12.4 million in FY1996 to 21.2 million in FY2015. Despite this growth, VWP entrants’ share of the number of tourist and business visitors has not kept pace. VWP arrivals made up 54 per cent of the 22.9 million I-94 tourist and business visitors to the US in FY1996, but only 31 per cent of the 69.0 million I-94 admissions in FY2015.6 It is important to note that the Department of Homeland Security’s Customs and Border Protection (CBP) agency made changes to its data systems in April 2013 that resulted in large increases in the number of I-94 admissions recorded compared 3 Department of Homeland Security (2015), ‘Statement By Secretary Jeh C. Johnson on Steps to Further Secure the Homeland’, 30 November 2015; and Siskin, A. (2016), Visa Waiver Program, Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service. 4 The legislation was enacted as part of the FY2016 Consolidated Appropriations Act. 5 This section is drawn from the author’s analysis of data from the Department of Homeland Security’s Office of Immigration Statistics, much of which has been published in its Yearbook of Immigration Statistics. 6 I-94 refers to the immigration form that foreign nationals complete when they are arriving in the US. 3 | Chatham House The US Visa Waiver Program: Facilitating Travel and Enhancing Security with previous years. Separating business visitors and tourists provides a more refined analysis, showing that the two groups exhibit distinct trends.7 The number of VWP business visitors, commonly labelled as VWB-1, has grown substantially over the 20-year period – by 124 per cent between FY1996 and FY2015. Arrivals of business visitors from non-VWP countries issued B-1 visas have increased at a comparable rate, and the percentage of total business visitors entering through the VWP was roughly the same in FY2015 (38 per cent) as it was in FY1996 (36 per cent). Figure 1 presents these data. Figure 1: B-1 and VWP business visitors, FY1996–FY2015 B-1 (left-hand axis) VWB-1 (left-hand axis) VWB % (right-hand axis) 6,000,000 1 0.9 5,000,000 0.8 0.7 4,000,000 0.6 3,000,000 0.5 0.4 2,000,000 0.3 0.2 1,000,000 0.1 0 0 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Source: Department of Homeland Security, Yearbook of Immigration Statistics, multiple years. Note: Includes only persons entering with I-94 petitions. Data are not available for FY1997, FY2000 and FY2001. The trends for tourist visas are markedly different, largely because the number of tourists issued B-2 visas from non-VWP countries has increased dramatically in recent years, as shown in Figure 2.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Client Alert
    September 28, 2006 Resurgens Plaza 945 East Paces Ferry Road Suite 2700 CLIENT ALERT Atlanta, Georgia 30326-1380 404.923.9000 The Department of State (“DOS”) recently published its 150 North Michigan Avenue 35th Floor instructions regarding the Diversity Lottery for 2008 (“DV-2008”). The Chicago, Illinois 60601-7553 U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (“USCIS”) recently announced 312.499.1400 that: (a) it is expanding the premium processing service to include three Lincoln Plaza 500 N. Akard Street additional employment-based immigrant visa categories; (b) its district Suite 2700 offices will no longer issue Interim Employment Authorization Documents Dallas, Texas 75201-3306 214.397.4300 (Form I-688B) as of October 1, 2006; and (c) any passport issued on or after Wells Fargo Plaza October 26, 2006, by a Visa Waiver Program (“VWP”) country must be an 1000 Louisiana Suite 5400 e-passport for VWP travelers to be eligible to enter the United States under Houston, Texas 77002-5013 the VWP. The U.S. Department of Labor (“USDOL”) recently 713.750.3100 implemented an online system to provide the general public with 1875 Century Park East Suite 500 information on cases pending at its Backlog Reduction Centers. Two states Los Angeles, California 90067-2506 have passed legislation addressing immigration enforcement issues. In this 310.556.8861 Special Alert, we shall address these and other recent developments in the Wachovia Financial Center 200 South Biscayne Boulevard immigration area. Suite 2100 Miami, Florida 33131 305.982.1520 1. Diversity Visa Lottery 2008 Two Gateway Center 12th Floor The DOS recently published its instructions for the 2008 Newark, New Jersey 07102-5003 973.642.1900 Diversity Lottery (“DV-2008”).
    [Show full text]
  • The Law of Asylum Procedure at the Border: Statutes and Agency Implementation
    The Law of Asylum Procedure at the Border: Statutes and Agency Implementation April 9, 2021 Congressional Research Service https://crsreports.congress.gov R46755 SUMMARY R46755 The Law of Asylum Procedure at the Border: April 9, 2021 Statutes and Agency Implementation Ben Harrington The Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) generally provides for the removal of non-U.S. Legislative Attorney citizens or nationals (“aliens,” under the INA) encountered at the border without valid entry documents, unless they qualify for asylum or other humanitarian protections. Two significant questions of legal procedure arise regarding these aliens (referred to here as “undocumented migrants” to distinguish them from aliens encountered in the interior of the United States). First, how should the United States determine which undocumented migrants qualify for humanitarian protections? By trial or some more rapid assessment? Second, how should undocumented migrants be treated while their claims are evaluated? Should the government detain them, release them under supervision, or—as the Trump Administration opted to do—require many of them to wait in Mexico? These questions have become more prominent as the flow of undocumented migrants seeking humanitarian protections (“asylum seekers”) has increased over the past decade. Most undocumented migrants encountered at the border are subject to expedited removal. The statutory framework for expedited removal outlines the following answers to these procedural questions: 1. Screening. Protection claims by undocumented migrants at the border should be screened for a level of potential merit called “credible fear,” and rejected if they lack such potential merit, before being referred to trial-type immigration court proceedings before the Executive Office for Immigration Review within the Department of Justice.
    [Show full text]
  • Visa Waiver Program
    Visa Waiver Program Alison Siskin Specialist in Immigration Policy February 12, 2014 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov RL32221 Visa Waiver Program Summary The visa waiver program (VWP) allows nationals from certain countries to enter the United States as temporary visitors (nonimmigrants) for business or pleasure without first obtaining a visa from a U.S. consulate abroad. Temporary visitors for business or pleasure from non-VWP countries must obtain a visa from Department of State (DOS) officers at a consular post abroad before coming to the United States. Concerns have been raised about the ability of terrorists to enter the United States under the VWP, because the VWP bypasses the first step by which foreign visitors are screened for admissibility to enter the United States. Nonetheless, there is interest in the VWP as a mechanism to promote tourism and commerce. In addition to increasing tourism, the inclusion of countries in the VWP may help foster positive relations between the United States and those countries, facilitate information sharing, and ease consular office workloads abroad. As of January 2014, 37 countries participate in the VWP. In FY2012, there were 19.1 million visitors who entered the United States under this program, constituting 40% of all overseas visitors. To qualify for the VWP, statute specifies that a country must offer reciprocal privileges to U.S. citizens; have had a nonimmigrant refusal rate of less than 3% for the previous year; issue their nationals machine-readable passports that incorporate biometric identifiers; certify that it is developing a program to issue tamper-resident, machine- readable visa documents that incorporate biometric identifiers which are verifiable at the country’s port of entry; and not compromise the law enforcement or security interests of the United States by its inclusion in the program.
    [Show full text]
  • CBP Offers Flexibility to Departing Visa Waiver Program Travelers | U.S
    4/20/2020 CBP Offers Flexibility to Departing Visa Waiver Program Travelers | U.S. Customs and Border Protection Official website of the Department of Homeland Security (https://www.facebook.com/CBPgov/) (https://www.instagram.com/cbpgov/) (https://www.flickr.com/photos/cbpphotos/) (https://twitter.com/cbp) (https://www.linkedin.com/company/2997?trk=tyah) (https://www.youtube.com/user/customsborderprotect) U.S. Customs and ( https(/)Border://public Protection.govdelivery.com/accounts/USDHSCBP/subscriber/new) (/) CBP Offers Flexibility to Departing Visa Waiver Program Travelers Release Date: April 17, 2020 Travelers Affected by Coronavirus May Apply for Extended Term of Admission WASHINGTON — U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) announced today that Visa Waiver Program (/travel/international-visitors/visa-waiver-program)travelers who have been granted satisfactory departure may apply for an additional 30-day extension of their admission period if they remain unable to depart the United States because of the novel coronavirus (COVID-19). The extension grants flexibility to Visa Waiver Program travelers who have difficulty returning to their countries due to COVID-19 related travel restrictions, flight cancellations or illness. Travelers who are granted satisfactory departure will have an additional 30 days to depart the United States aer their lawful period of admission concludes. Visa Waiver Program travelers may seek satisfactory departure by contacting: 1. Any local CBP Port of Entry (/contact/ports) or Deferred Inspection Site (/contact/ports/deferred- inspection-sites); or 2. The U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services Contact Center (https://www.uscis.gov/contactcenter). Travelers should be prepared to provide their passport number when submitting their request.
    [Show full text]
  • Expedited Removal of Aliens: Legal Framework
    Expedited Removal of Aliens: Legal Framework Updated October 8, 2019 Congressional Research Service https://crsreports.congress.gov R45314 SUMMARY R45314 Expedited Removal of Aliens: Legal Framework October 8, 2019 The federal government has broad authority over the admission of non-U.S. nationals (aliens) seeking to enter the United States. The Supreme Court has repeatedly held that the government Hillel R. Smith may exclude such aliens without affording them the due process protections that traditionally Legislative Attorney apply to persons physically present in the United States. Instead, aliens seeking entry are entitled only to those procedural protections that Congress has expressly authorized. Consistent with this broad authority, Congress established an expedited removal process for certain aliens who have arrived in the United States without permission. In general, aliens whom immigration authorities seek to remove from the United States may challenge that determination in administrative proceedings with attendant statutory rights to counsel, evidentiary requirements, and appeal. Under the streamlined expedited removal process created by the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996 and codified in Section 235(b)(1) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA), however, certain aliens deemed inadmissible by an immigration officer may be removed from the United States without further administrative hearings or review. INA Section 235(b)(1) applies only to certain aliens who are inadmissible into the United States because they either lack valid entry documents or have attempted to procure their admission through fraud or misrepresentation. The statute generally permits the government to summarily remove those aliens if they are arriving in the United States.
    [Show full text]
  • Teaching Immigration with the Immigrant Stories Project LESSON PLANS
    Teaching Immigration with the Immigrant Stories Project LESSON PLANS 1 Acknowledgments The Immigration History Research Center and The Advocates for Human Rights would like to thank the many people who contributed to these lesson plans. Lead Editor: Madeline Lohman Contributors: Elizabeth Venditto, Erika Lee, and Saengmany Ratsabout Design: Emily Farell and Brittany Lynk Volunteers and Interns: Biftu Bussa, Halimat Alawode, Hannah Mangen, Josefina Abdullah, Kristi Herman Hill, and Meredith Rambo. Archival Assistance and Photo Permissions: Daniel Necas A special thank you to the Immigration History Research Center Archives for permitting the reproduction of several archival photos. The lessons would not have been possible without the generous support of a Joan Aldous Diversity Grant from the University of Minnesota’s College of Liberal Arts. Immigrant Stories is a project of the Immigration History Research Center at the University of Minnesota. This work has been made possible through generous funding from the Digital Public Library of America Digital Hubs Pilot Project, the John S. and James L. Knight Foundation, and the National Endowment for the Humanities. About the Immigration History Research Center Founded in 1965, the University of Minnesota's Immigration History Research Center (IHRC) aims to transform how we understand immigration in the past and present. Along with its partner, the IHRC Archives, it is North America's oldest and largest interdisciplinary research center and archives devoted to preserving and understanding immigrant and refugee life. The IHRC promotes interdisciplinary research on migration, race, and ethnicity in the United States and the world. It connects U.S. immigration history research to contemporary immigrant and refugee communities through its Immigrant Stories project.
    [Show full text]
  • Immigrants and Marijuana | May 2021 1
    Practice Advisory | May 2021 IMMIGRANTS AND MARIJUANA By Kathy Brady, Zachary Nightingale, and Matt Adams Table of Contents1 I. Overview: Immigrants and Legalized Marijuana .................................................................. 3 II. Federal and State Marijuana Laws ....................................................................................... 4 III. Removal Grounds and Good Moral Character Bars Triggered by Marijuana ..................... 5 A. Conviction ....................................................................................................................... 5 B. Admitting Commission of a State or Federal Drug Offense ........................................... 7 C. Immigration Authorities Gain “Reason to Believe” the Person Participated in Trafficking ............................................................................. 8 D. Lawful Employment in the Cannabis Industry ................................................................ 8 E. Finding of Addiction or Abuse ......................................................................................... 9 F. Only the Above Cause Inadmissibility ............................................................................. 10 IV. Defend Immigrants from Becoming Inadmissible for Admitting to Marijuana Conduct............................................................................................ 10 A. Inform the Client about the Law ...................................................................................... 10 B. Instruct the Client
    [Show full text]
  • Page 211 TITLE 8—ALIENS and NATIONALITY § 1187 § 1187. Visa Waiver Program for Certain Visitors
    Page 211 TITLE 8—ALIENS AND NATIONALITY § 1187 2, 2002]. Until such regulations are promulgated, the country has issued that do not meet the Attorney General shall not deny a petition filed or requirement of subparagraph (A). pending under section 216A(c)(1)(A) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1186b(c)(1)(A)) that re- (4) Executes immigration forms lates to an eligible alien described in section 11031, or The alien before the time of such admission on an application filed or pending under section 245 of completes such immigration form as the At- such Act (8 U.S.C. 1255) that relates to an eligible alien torney General shall establish. described in section 11032. Until such regulations are promulgated, the Attorney General shall not initiate or (5) Entry into the United States proceed with removal proceedings under section 240 of If arriving by sea or air, the alien arrives at the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1229a) the port of entry into the United States on a that relate to an eligible alien described in section 11031 or 11032. carrier, including any carrier conducting oper- ations under part 135 of title 14, Code of Fed- ‘‘SEC. 11034. DEFINITIONS. eral Regulations, or a noncommercial aircraft ‘‘Except as otherwise provided, the terms used in this that is owned or operated by a domestic cor- chapter shall have the meaning given such terms in section 101(b) of the Immigration and Nationality Act poration conducting operations under part 91 1 (8 U.S.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Visa Waiver Program
    Visa Waiver Program Alison Siskin Specialist in Immigration Policy January 15, 2013 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov RL32221 CRS Report for Congress Prepared for Members and Committees of Congress Visa Waiver Program Summary The visa waiver program (VWP) allows nationals from certain countries to enter the United States as temporary visitors (nonimmigrants) for business or pleasure without first obtaining a visa from a U.S. consulate abroad. Temporary visitors for business or pleasure from non-VWP countries must obtain a visa from Department of State (DOS) officers at a consular post abroad before coming to the United States. Concerns have been raised about the ability of terrorists to enter the United States under the VWP, because the VWP bypasses the first step by which foreign visitors are screened for admissibility to enter the United States. Nonetheless, the current economic climate has heightened interest in the VWP as a mechanism to promote tourism and commerce. In addition to increasing tourism, the inclusion of countries in the VWP may help foster positive relations between the United States and those countries, facilitate information sharing, and ease consular office workloads abroad. As of December 2012, 37 countries participate in the VWP. Taiwan, the most recent entrant, was designated a program country on October 2, 2012. In FY2011, there were 18.3 million visitors who entered the United States under this program, constituting 40% of all overseas visitors. To qualify for the VWP, statute specifies that a
    [Show full text]
  • DHS Announces Further Travel Restrictions for the Visa Waiver Program
    Appeal:5/24/2017 17-1351 Doc: 297-1DHS A n n o u n c e s FFiled:urther Tr a05/25/2017vel Restrictions f o r t h e Pg:Visa W1a iofver 20Program | Homeland Security Official website of the Department of Homeland Security Contact Us Quick Links Site Map A­Z Index Archived Content In an effort to keep DHS.gov current, the archive contains content from a previous administration or is otherwise outdated. DHS Announces Further Travel Restrictions for the Visa Waiver Program Release Date: February 18, 2016 For Immediate Release DHS Press Office Contact: 202-282-8010 WASHINGTON—The Department of Homeland Security today announced that it is continuing its implementation of the Visa Waiver Program Improvement and Terrorist Travel Prevention Act of 2015 with the addition of Libya, Somalia, and Yemen as three countries of concern, limiting Visa Waiver Program travel for certain individuals who have traveled to these countries. Pursuant to the Act, the Secretary of Homeland Security had sixty days to determine whether additional countries or areas of concern should be subject to the travel or dual nationality restrictions under the Act. After careful consideration, and in https://www.dhs.gov/news/2016/02/18/dhs­announces­further­travel­restrictions­visa­waiver­program 1/3 Appeal:5/24/2017 17-1351 Doc: 297-1DHS A n n o u n c e s FFiled:urther Tr a05/25/2017vel Restrictions f o r t h e Pg:Visa W2a iofver 20Program | Homeland Security consultation with the Director of National Intelligence and the Secretary of State, the Secretary of Homeland Security has determined that Libya, Somalia, and Yemen be included as countries of concern, specifically for individuals who have traveled to these countries since March 1, 2011.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Immigration Enforcement and the Cooperation of States and Localities
    1 Tony West Assistant Attorney General 2 Dennis K. Burke United States Attorney 3 Arthur R. Goldberg Assistant Director, Federal Programs Branch 4 Varu Chilakamarri (NY Bar #4324299) Joshua Wilkenfeld (NY Bar #4440681) 5 U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Division 20 Massachusetts Avenue, N.W. 6 Washington, DC 20530 Tel. (202) 616-8489/Fax (202) 616-8470 7 [email protected] Attorneys for the United States 8 9 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 11 The United States of America, 12 No. 13 Plaintiff, PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR 14 v. PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION AND MEMORANDUM OF LAW 15 The State of Arizona; and Janice K. Brewer, IN SUPPORT THEREOF Governor of the State of Arizona, in her 16 Official Capacity, ORAL ARGUMENT REQUESTED 17 18 Defendants. 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS 2 Page 3 INTRODUCTION ......................................................1 4 BACKGROUND ...................................................... 3 5 I. FEDERAL STATUTORY & REGULATORY FRAMEWORK GOVERNING IMMIGRATION ......................................3 6 A. Federal Laws and Discretion Regarding the Entry, Removal, 7 and Treatment of Aliens Within the United States ...................4 8 B. Federal Immigration Enforcement and the Cooperation of States and Localities ......................................... 6 9 10 II. ARIZONA’S S.B. 1070 ............................................ 7 11 A. Section 2 – Arizona’s Mandatory Alien Inspection Scheme ........... 7 12 B. Section 3 – Arizona’s Alien Registration Crime ................... 8 13 C. Section 4/Ariz. Rev. Stat. 13-2319 – Arizona’s Alien Smuggling Crime ...................................... 9 14 D. Section 5 – Arizona’s Alien Work Crime ..........................9 15 E. Section 5 – Arizona’s Alien Transporting and Harboring Crime ........ 9 16 F.
    [Show full text]
  • Primer on U.S. Immigration Policy
    Primer on U.S. Immigration Policy Updated July 1, 2021 Congressional Research Service https://crsreports.congress.gov R45020 SUMMARY R45020 Primer on U.S. Immigration Policy July 1, 2021 U.S. immigration policy is governed largely by the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA), which was first codified in 1952 and has been amended significantly several times since. U.S. William A. Kandel immigration policy contains two major aspects. One facilitates migration flows into the United Analyst in Immigration States according to principles of admission that are based upon national interest. These broad Policy principles currently include family reunification, U.S. labor market contribution, origin-country diversity, and humanitarian assistance. The United States has long distinguished permanent from temporary immigration. Permanent immigration occurs through family and employer-sponsored categories, the diversity immigrant visa lottery, and refugee and asylee admissions. Temporary immigration occurs through the admission of foreign nationals for specific purposes and limited periods of time, and encompasses two dozen categories that include foreign tourists, students, temporary workers, and diplomats. The other major aspect of U.S. immigration policy involves restricting entry to and removing persons from the United States who lack authorization to be in the country, are identified as criminal aliens, or whose presence in the United States is determined to not serve the national interest. Such immigration enforcement is broadly divided between border enforcement—at and between U.S. land, air, and sea ports of entry—and other enforcement tasks including interior enforcement, detention, removal, worksite enforcement, and combatting immigration fraud. The dual role of U.S. immigration policy—admissions and enforcement—creates challenges for balancing major policy priorities, such as ensuring national security, facilitating trade and commerce, protecting public safety, and fostering international cooperation.
    [Show full text]