DOCSLIB.ORG

Capitalism: Competition, Conflict, Crises Anwar Shaikh

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Capitalism: Competition, Conflict, Crises Anwar Shaikh RESEÑA BIBLIOGRÁFICA CAPITALISM: COMPETITION, CONFLICT, CRISES ANWAR SHAIKH by Francisco A. Martínez Hernández Universidad Anáhuac México Víctor M. Isidro Luna Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México In 1,024 pages, seventeen chapters, and divided in three books, plus seventeen appendixes, Anwar Shaikh, one of the leading scholars and a distinguished Professor of Economics at the New School for Social Research, presents a path breaking and monumental book which main objective is the unified study of the logic, history, dynamics, and crises of the capitalist system. Throughout this book, the author confronts his own perspective and method of the classical political economy with major New York, NY, Oxford schools of economic thought such as neoclassical, mon- University Press, 2016, etarist, and different branches of the post-Keynesian 979 pp. school. The main hypothesis of the author is that capitalism main driver is the constant seeking for higher profits in a competitive environment that operates through a pro- cess that the author describes as a ‘real competition’. This position is completely different from the neoclassical view of perfect competition and the post-Keynesian notion of imperfect competition. This basic concept of real competition that Shaikh adopts throughout his magnum opus can be traced back to the writings of Smith, Ricardo, Marx, and Harrod. Essentially, this approach considers competition as a process of intense rivalry among firms in the classical sense, where all pro- http://dx.doi.org/10.22201/fe.01851667p.2020.311.72441 © 2020 Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Facultad de Economía. Este es un artículo Open Access bajo la licencia CC BY-NC-ND IE, 79(311), enero-marzo de 2020 137 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). ducers try to get a share of their mar- foundations but also it may create ket by lowering costs through wage new research avenues in economic reduction and technological change. analysis, just as Marshall’s Principles This turbulent process of ferocious of Economics, or Keynes’ General competition leads to the formation Theory did. For example, in micro- of a leading (regulating) produc- economics (on its connection with er-capital which tends to establish macroeconomics), while portraying the lowest unit cost-price of produc- different working shifts in the labor tion at which other firms-prices will process, arise different shapes in cost gravitate. As such, this competition curves that can lead to the identifica- process as warfare happens within tion of different lowest regions of the and inter industries, including other average variable cost (avc) according economic sectors, tending to estab- to the chosen working shift (chapter lish other regulating prices or key 4, pp. 156-159). Then given the low- rates such as the general rate of profit, est avc, one can identify a normal the rate of interest, relative prices, capacity utilization rate at the macro wages, equities, expected return of level under the process of real com- capital (investment), and exchange petition (chapter 12, pp. 551-552). rates. Accordingly, this mechanism At the macro level, most common of real competition outlines the short models in macroeconomics take for and long-term patterns of econom- granted that aggregate investment ic growth, income distribution, and and savings are equal at any point economic cycles (e.g. Kondratiev). in time, and in general, it is assumed Thereby, for the author, the search that the saving rate is constant. By for profits regulates both supply and contrast, Shaikh distinguishes one demand and could even determine short run cycle of three to five years the degree of state intervention. as a typology to describe the short- In our opinion, besides the ex- run adjustment between the demand haustive and excellent analysis of the and supply, inventories and profit rate history of economic thought and sev- equalization. Furthermore, by defin- eral classical macro dynamic models, ing the long run cycle between seven an outstanding contribution of this to eleven years, Shaikh found that book to the economic science is the capacity utilization, labor market, treatment of time within the con- and reposition of capital are the main cept of real competition. In doing so, determinants of long-term fluctu- it does not only show the deficien- ations. It is significant to note that cies in traditional micro and macro these typologies (chapter 3, p. 109) 138 IE, 79(311), enero-marzo de 2020 • http://dx.doi.org/10.22201/fe.01851667p.2020.311.72441 emerge from his acute knowledge of variables or equations, which can of the national income and product be subject to empirical analysis. For accounts (nipa) in addition to oth- instance, he starts by analyzing eco- er sources of data, which the author nomics facts in a historical context. uses thoroughly to construct many Then, he moves on confronting other economic series and to show different empirical results adopting the classi- and unique economic patterns. cal perspective in terms of theory as Another key result of Shaikh’s work well as modeling; subsequently, by by considering time and his concept narrowing down the subject of study of real competition is the discovery of to a set of a manageable set of vari- a new and stable Classical version ables, he conducts empirical analy- of the Phillips curve which defines sis through the use of mathematical the patterns between real wages and models, statistical (graphics) and productivity. Most significantly, it econometric models in addition to clarifies the links between these fac- mathematical programming. In this tors with the levels of unemployment way, Shaikh approaches the subject by intensity, showing the intricate in- considering first the complexity of an teractions among state intervention, economic system and then attempt- workers and capitalists in determin- ing to simplify his analysis. In what ing the rate of unemployment, wages, follows, we discuss the content of the and profits. The author obtained these book and then we turn to exploring results through careful analysis of some suggestions for improvement data and using the classical political for a possible next edition of this fas- economy framework without relying cinating book. on the assumption of rational expec- The whole volume is comprised tations like other economists such as of three books. Part 1 “Foundations of Friedman and Phelps. Finally, another the Analysis” contents six chapters path breaking result is that in chap- (1-6). Chapter 1 is a detailed and ter 3 there is a derivation of a down- well-documented introduction of ward negative sloping demand curve the whole book where the key con- without using the neoclassical famous cepts are defined. Chapter 2 is a neat assumptions of hyper-rationality, op- empirical description of how a capi- timization, perfect information, and talist economy behaves (unemploy- representative agents. ment, productivity, price levels, profit Shaikh’s methodological approach rate, growth, etc.). Growth as well as focuses on boiling down complex short-and long-term fluctuations are real problems into a manageable set considered by Shaikh to be inward Reseña bibliográfica 139 characteristics of the capitalist sys- Chapter 5 advances two approach- tem. Finally, chapter 2 underscored es in the conceptualization of money the difference between incremen- and exchange. First of all, Shaikh ex- tal and average rates of profitability plains that exchange is an economic which, according to the author, only institution that gives rise to money. the former is relevant to new capital, He reckons that while the emergence so “they should be equalized by the of a state is significant to understand mobility of (new) capital across sec- the origins of fiat money at a later tors” (p. 73). Chapter 3 will appeal stage, he does not believe in Chartal- to young and old scholars because of ists theories, which posit that the state its abandonment of unrealistic mi- was responsible to create money from croeconomics foundations. In this early times. Chapter 6 is dedicated chapter, Shaikh rejects almost the to show that profits are the engine whole set of neoclassical assump- of the capitalist system. Shaikh de- tions to derive the demand curve. fines capital as a “thing” that produc- Through simulation of a different es profits, and he distinguishes two micro model, Shaikh concludes that types of profit: On production and social aggregates are very different upon alienation. Finally, he presents from individual behaviors. different empirical measures of the In chapter 4, Shaikh critiques evolution of the rate of profit. neoclassical and post-Keynesian cost Part 2 “Real Competition” is dedi- curves. First, he argues that neoclas- cated to the analysis of real competi- sical cost-curves do not have any tion with five chapters (7-11). Chap- reason to include average profit as ter 7 encompasses “the theory of real a cost because a firm’s cost is repre- competition”. In this chapter, Shaikh sented by labor, machinery, and de- asserts that firms compete with each preciation. Additionally, in his view other using three mechanisms of cut- post-Keynesians are mi taken to think ting costs: Technical change, wage that the markup is the source of prof- reduction, and the increase in the its. Second, for Shaikh it is quite im- length or intensity of the working portant to recognize that there is a day. These mechanisms in one way time dimension behind any process or another are usually glossed over of production, whereby the cost- or disregarded by other schools of curves modify their shape because thought in general. If new investment of the total duration of the working has a higher expected rate of prof- day and the consideration of different it in some specific industries, then working shifts. capital will move to these areas of 140 IE, 79(311), enero-marzo de 2020 • http://dx.doi.org/10.22201/fe.01851667p.2020.311.72441 higher profitability.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Monopolistic Competition in General Equilibrium: Beyond the CES Evgeny Zhelobodko, Sergey Kokovin, Mathieu Parenti, Jacques-François Thisse
    Monopolistic competition in general equilibrium: Beyond the CES Evgeny Zhelobodko, Sergey Kokovin, Mathieu Parenti, Jacques-François Thisse To cite this version: Evgeny Zhelobodko, Sergey Kokovin, Mathieu Parenti, Jacques-François Thisse. Monopolistic com- petition in general equilibrium: Beyond the CES. 2011. halshs-00566431 HAL Id: halshs-00566431 https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00566431 Preprint submitted on 16 Feb 2011 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. WORKING PAPER N° 2011 - 08 Monopolistic competition in general equilibrium: Beyond the CES Evgeny Zhelobodko Sergey Kokovin Mathieu Parenti Jacques-François Thisse JEL Codes: D43, F12, L13 Keywords: monopolistic competition, additive preferences, love for variety, heterogeneous firms PARIS-JOURDAN SCIENCES ECONOMIQUES 48, BD JOURDAN – E.N.S. – 75014 PARIS TÉL. : 33(0) 1 43 13 63 00 – FAX : 33 (0) 1 43 13 63 10 www.pse.ens.fr CENTRE NATIONAL DE LA RECHERCHE SCIENTIFIQUE – ECOLE DES HAUTES ETUDES EN SCIENCES SOCIALES ÉCOLE DES PONTS PARISTECH – ECOLE NORMALE SUPÉRIEURE – INSTITUT NATIONAL DE LA RECHERCHE AGRONOMIQUE Monopolistic Competition in General Equilibrium: Beyond the CES∗ Evgeny Zhelobodko† Sergey Kokovin‡ Mathieu Parenti§ Jacques-François Thisse¶ 13th February 2011 Abstract We propose a general model of monopolistic competition and derive a complete characterization of the market equilibrium using the concept of Relative Love for Variety.
    [Show full text]
  • HES Book of Abstracts
    45th Annual Meetings of the History of Economics Society Book of Abstracts Loyola University Chicago Chicago, Illinois June 14 - 17, 2018 1 Abstracts of Papers to be Presented at the 2018 History of Economics Society Annual Conference Loyola University Chicago, Chicago, Illinois June 14 - 17, 2018 TABLE OF CONTENTS Friday, June 15 FRI Plenary Session: Douglas Irwin, "The Rise and Fall of Import Substitution" .................. 3 FRI1A Session: “Smith and his Intellectual Milleu (IASS)” .............................................................. 3 FRI1B Session: “Remembering Craufurd Goodwin” .......................................................................... 5 FRI1C Session: “American Political Economy” ..................................................................................... 5 FRI1D Session: “Constitutional Economics” .......................................................................................... 7 FRI1E Session: “European Issues" ............................................................................................................. 9 FRI1F Session: “Biology” .............................................................................................................................11 FRI2A Session: “Smith and his Contemporary Issues (IASS)” ......................................................14 FRI2B Session: “Archival Round Table” ................................................................................................15 FRI2C Session: “French Economics in the Long 19th Century” ...................................................16
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 5 Perfect Competition, Monopoly, and Economic Vs
    Chapter Outline Chapter 5 • From Perfect Competition to Perfect Competition, Monopoly • Supply Under Perfect Competition Monopoly, and Economic vs. Normal Profit McGraw -Hill/Irwin © 2007 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved. McGraw -Hill/Irwin © 2007 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved. From Perfect Competition to Picking the Quantity to Maximize Profit Monopoly The Perfectly Competitive Case P • Perfect Competition MC ATC • Monopolistic Competition AVC • Oligopoly P* MR • Monopoly Q* Q Many Competitors McGraw -Hill/Irwin © 2007 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved. McGraw -Hill/Irwin © 2007 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved. Picking the Quantity to Maximize Profit Characteristics of Perfect The Monopoly Case Competition P • a large number of competitors, such that no one firm can influence the price MC • the good a firm sells is indistinguishable ATC from the ones its competitors sell P* AVC • firms have good sales and cost forecasts D • there is no legal or economic barrier to MR its entry into or exit from the market Q* Q No Competitors McGraw -Hill/Irwin © 2007 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved. McGraw -Hill/Irwin © 2007 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved. 1 Monopoly Monopolistic Competition • The sole seller of a good or service. • Monopolistic Competition: a situation in a • Some monopolies are generated market where there are many firms producing similar but not identical goods. because of legal rights (patents and copyrights). • Example : the fast-food industry. McDonald’s has a monopoly on the “Happy Meal” but has • Some monopolies are utilities (gas, much competition in the market to feed kids water, electricity etc.) that result from burgers and fries.
    [Show full text]
  • Values and Value Transfers: a Comment on Itoh
    : VALUES AND VALUE TRANSFERS: A COMMENT ON ITOH Anwar Shaikh Itoh's essay provides a valuable retrospective on recent debates concerning the Marxian theory of value. He points out that the economic crisis enveloping both cap­ itaJist and socialist worlds from the 1970s onward challenged economists to rethink and refine their basic approaches. Among other things. this sparked a resurgence of interest in fundamental issues such as Ihe theory of value. Thus, what appears as an abstraCt discussion is actually rooted in historical events, with political and economic implications for the current period (above. 53-54), Itoh also emphasizes the importance of Sraffa's work in revitalizing the Marxist discussion ofva1ue theory. Sraffa's pathbreak.ing work provided a new platform for a critique of neoclassical economics, even as it "rchabilitatcd the objcctive theory of value" which is characteristic of me classical and Marxian traditions. But his narrow focus and elliptical style left open the question of the relation between his approach and that of more general economic framewocks. Not swprisingiy, many of his followers set out to incol']X)rate his unconventional approach into a more orthodox "neo-Ricardian" framework, in which the emphasis was on mathematical and functional analyses of CQuilibriwn prices. Inevitably, this gave rise to a divergence between nco-Ricardian and Marxian writers (54--60). Two issues are highlighted by Itoh: the problems which arise with Marx's procedure for linking labor value and money price magnitudes (the transfonnatiOil problem), problems which appear LO undermine the Marxian claim that value magnitudes arc the foundation of price magnitudes; and the claim that value categories are in any case redundant, since market prices actually gravitate around prices of production, not labor values (60).
    [Show full text]
  • Advanced Economic Analysis for Competition Enforcement 16 – 18 July 2018 DRAFT COURSE OUTLINE
    4th ANNUAL COMPETITION AND ECONOMIC REGULATION (ACER) WEEK Advanced economic analysis for competition enforcement 16 – 18 July 2018 DRAFT COURSE OUTLINE Targeted at experienced competition economists from authorities, regulators, public and private sector firms and private practice, this intensive Professional Training Programme (PTP) will cover the latest developments in economic theory and their application to the analysis of competition cases. This PTP will cover frameworks for understanding abuse of dominance, coordinated conduct and mergers from theoretical and practical perspectives. It will equip participants with the specialist knowledge and skills required to undertake rigorous economic analysis in competition cases. The course will be facilitated by Dr Javier Tapia (Judge at the Competition Tribunal of the Republic of Chile and a senior researcher at Regcom, the Centre for Regulation and Competition at Universidad de Chile, Faculty of Law), Prof Liberty Mncube (Chief Economist at the Competition Commission of South Africa, Visiting Associate Professor of Economics, University of Witwatersrand and Honorary Professor of Economics, University of Stellenbosch), Dr Andrea Amelio (part of the European DG COMP’s Chief Economist Team) and Ms Reena das Nair, Senior Lecturer in the College of Business and Economics and Senior Researcher at the Centre for Competition, Regulation and Economic Development (CCRED) at the University of Johannesburg. Approach The PTP will be taught primarily by means of lectures, which will draw on international and South African examples and precedent-setting cases with a strong focus on underlying economic principles. The lectures will be complemented by case study exercises involving analysis of data and fact patterns by different groups who will present findings in feedback sessions.
    [Show full text]
  • General Equilibrium Concepts Under Imperfect Competition: a Cournotian Approach∗
    General Equilibrium Concepts under Imperfect Competition: A Cournotian Approach∗ Claude d'Aspremont,y Rodolphe Dos Santos Ferreiraz and Louis-Andr´eG´erard-Varetx Received May 14, 1993; revised March 21, 1996 Abstract In a pure exchange economy we propose a general equilibrium concept under imperfect competition, the \Cournotian Monopolistic Competition Equilibrium", and compare it to the Cournot-Walras and the Monopolistic Competition concepts. The advantage of the proposed concept is to require less computational ability from the agents. The comparison is made first through a simple example, then through a more abstract concept, the P -equilibrium based on a general notion of price coordination, the pricing-scheme. Journal of Economic Literature Classification Numbers: D5, D43 ∗Reprinted from Journal of Economic Theory, 73, 199{230, 1997. Financial Support from the European Commission HCM Programme and from the Belgian State PAI Programme (Prime Minister's Office, Science Policy Programming) is gratefully acknowledged. yCORE, Universit´ecatholique de Louvain, 34 voie du Roman Pays, 1348-Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium zBETA, Universit´eLouis Pasteur, 38 boulevard d'Anvers, 67000-Strasbourg, France xGREQE, Ecole des Hautes Etudes en Sciences Sociales, F-13002-Marseille, France. 1 1 Introduction The formal simplicity of general equilibrium theory under perfect competition and of its assump- tions on the individual agents' characteristics, can easily be contrasted with the complexity and the ad hoc assumptions of the general analysis of imperfect competition. However the simplic- ity of general competitive analysis is all due to a single behavioral hypothesis, namely that all sellers and buyers take prices as given. This price-taking hypothesis allows for a clear notion of individual rationality, based on the simplest form of anticipations (rigid ones) and an exoge- nous form of coordination (the auctioneer).
    [Show full text]
  • Anwar Shaikh Some Universal Patterns in Income Distribution
    Anwar Shaikh Some Universal Patterns in Income Distribution: An Econophysics Approach August 2018 Working Paper 08/2018 Department of Economics The New School for Social Research The views expressed herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the New School for Social Research. © 2018 by Anwar Shaikh. All rights reserved. Short sections of text may be quoted without explicit permission provided that full credit is given to the source. Some Universal Patterns in Income Distribution: An Econophysics Approach Abstract This paper utilizes the econophysics "two class" (EPTC) approach to income distribution to derive certain empirical rules applying to all countries in the comprehensive World Income Inequality (WIID) database. This approach demonstrates that wage incomes follow an exponential distribution while property incomes follow a Pareto distribution, which leads to a simple and empirically robust approximation to the Lorenz curve. We in turn show that the per capita income of any bottom fraction (x) of the population is proportional to “inequality adjusted GDP per capita”, i.e. to (GDP per capita)∙(1-Gini), the constant of proportionality a(x) being solely a function of population fraction under consideration. This proposition is empirically robust across countries and over time in our large database. We focus on two patterns. The “1.1 Rule” in which the income per capita of the bottom 80 percent of a country's population, what we call the Vast Majority Income, can be calculated in every country as 1.1(GDP per capita)∙(1-Gini). Using the VMI in place of GDP per capita gives rise to different country rankings.
    [Show full text]
  • Principles of Microeconomics
    PRINCIPLES OF MICROECONOMICS A. Competition The basic motivation to produce in a market economy is the expectation of income, which will generate profits. • The returns to the efforts of a business - the difference between its total revenues and its total costs - are profits. Thus, questions of revenues and costs are key in an analysis of the profit motive. • Other motivations include nonprofit incentives such as social status, the need to feel important, the desire for recognition, and the retaining of one's job. Economists' calculations of profits are different from those used by businesses in their accounting systems. Economic profit = total revenue - total economic cost • Total economic cost includes the value of all inputs used in production. • Normal profit is an economic cost since it occurs when economic profit is zero. It represents the opportunity cost of labor and capital contributed to the production process by the producer. • Accounting profits are computed only on the basis of explicit costs, including labor and capital. Since they do not take "normal profits" into consideration, they overstate true profits. Economic profits reward entrepreneurship. They are a payment to discovering new and better methods of production, taking above-average risks, and producing something that society desires. The ability of each firm to generate profits is limited by the structure of the industry in which the firm is engaged. The firms in a competitive market are price takers. • None has any market power - the ability to control the market price of the product it sells. • A firm's individual supply curve is a very small - and inconsequential - part of market supply.
    [Show full text]
  • Marxian Competition Versus Perfect So-Called Choice of Technique
    Shaikh, Anwar, Marxian competition versus perfect competition: further comments on the so-called choice of technique , Cambridge Journal of Economics, 4:1 (1980:Mar.) p.75 Cambridge Journal of Economics 1980,4,75-83 Marxian competition versus perfect cOlDpetition: further cOlDlDents on the so-called choice of technique Anwar Shaikh* In my notes on Dobb, I chose to focus on his discussion of Marx's theory of the falling rate of profit, for three reasons: first, because I believed that Dobb's representation of Marx is inadequate; second, because I wished to disentangle Dobb's version from Marx's, since the former has become quite influential and is often presented as being identical to the latter;t last, and most important, because I believed that Marx's own argument is both more interesting and more powerful than that of Dobb. I remain firmly unrepentant on all three points. t In my development of the argument as it actually appears in Marx, I tried to make two central points. The first of these was that mechanisation becomes the dominant form of technical change precisely because it is the production of surplus value, not use value, which is the dominant aspect of the labour process under capitalism. Thus for Marx the inherent tendency towards automation arises out of the social relations of production themselves, out of the relation of capital to labour in the production process, and not out of the relation of capital to capital in competition (Marx, 1973, pp. 776-777). The second point I tried to make is that nonetheless competition does have a bearing on possible mechanisations: it tests these potential weapons in the fire of battle.
    [Show full text]
  • PRINCIPLES of MICROECONOMICS 2E
    PRINCIPLES OF MICROECONOMICS 2e Chapter 8 Perfect Competition PowerPoint Image Slideshow Competition in Farming Depending upon the competition and prices offered, a wheat farmer may choose to grow a different crop. (Credit: modification of work by Daniel X. O'Neil/Flickr Creative Commons) 8.1 Perfect Competition and Why It Matters ● Market structure - the conditions in an industry, such as number of sellers, how easy or difficult it is for a new firm to enter, and the type of products that are sold. ● Perfect competition - each firm faces many competitors that sell identical products. • 4 criteria: • many firms produce identical products, • many buyers and many sellers are available, • sellers and buyers have all relevant information to make rational decisions, • firms can enter and leave the market without any restrictions. ● Price taker - a firm in a perfectly competitive market that must take the prevailing market price as given. 8.2 How Perfectly Competitive Firms Make Output Decisions ● A perfectly competitive firm has only one major decision to make - what quantity to produce? ● A perfectly competitive firm must accept the price for its output as determined by the product’s market demand and supply. ● The maximum profit will occur at the quantity where the difference between total revenue and total cost is largest. Total Cost and Total Revenue at a Raspberry Farm ● Total revenue for a perfectly competitive firm is a straight line sloping up; the slope is equal to the price of the good. ● Total cost also slopes up, but with some curvature. ● At higher levels of output, total cost begins to slope upward more steeply because of diminishing marginal returns.
    [Show full text]
  • The Transformation from Marx to Sraffa Anwar Shaikh
    3 The Transformation from Marx to Sraffa Anwar Shaikh I. Introduction Recent history has seen a tremendous revival of Marxist economic analysis. But this process has also produced its own specific problems, because as Marxist economics gain in respectibility, the temptation to represent itself i~ respectable terms grows accordingly. And these terms, in the end, are ·almost always the wrong ones. There is no question but that Marxism must appropriate all modem developments. Bur to appropriate them involves much more than merely adopting them. It involves tearing them out of the bourgeois framework in which they appear, examining their hidden premises, and re-situating them (when and if possible) on a Marxist terrain-a terrain which cannot be derived merely by algebraic variation or sociological transformation of the premises of orthodox economics. We must, and indeed we do, have our own ground to stand upon. It is my contention that the Sraffian, neo-Ricardian, tradition is by far too respectable. Its roots in left Keynesianism are easy to establish, and its refuge in mathematical economics is quite revealing. Nonetheless, the claims made by this school must be addressed, and· its real contributions must be separated out from what is merely part of its cloak of respectability. In this paper I do not intend to reproduce previous criticisms of the neo-Ricardians, nor even to reproduce my own arguments in favour of Marx's theory of value. Instead, in the discussion that follows I would like to show that even within the algebraic framework of which the neo-Ricardians are so proud, there are a host of issues which they do not, and cannot, face.
    [Show full text]
  • Benefits of Competition and Indicators of Market Power
    COUNCIL OF ECONOMIC ADVISERS ISSUE BRIEF APRIL 2016 BENEFITS OF COMPETITION AND INDICATORS OF MARKET POWER Introduction sanction anticompetitive behavior, and help define the contours of antitrust law through court decisions. These This issue brief describes the ways in which competition measures not only have immediate effects on the between firms can benefit consumers, workers, behavior that is challenged but also may help deter entrepreneurs, small businesses and the economy more anticompetitive abuses in the future. generally, and also describes how these benefits can be lost when competition is impaired by firms’ actions or Promoting competition extends beyond enforcement of government policies. Several indicators suggest that antitrust laws, it is also about a range of other pro- competition may be decreasing in many economic competitive policies. Several U.S. departments and sectors, including the decades-long decline in new agencies are actively using their authority to advance business formation and increases in industry-specific pro-competition and pro-consumer policies and measures of concentration. Recent data also show that regulations. For example, in several cases the Federal returns may have risen for the most profitable firms. To Aviation Administration (FAA) of the Department of the extent that profit rates exceed firms’ cost of capital— Transportation (DOT) has sought to provide competitive which may be suggested by the rising spread on the airline carriers with greater access to take-off and return to invested capital relative to Treasury bonds— landing slots at capacity constrained “slot-controlled” they may reflect economic rents, which are returns to airports. The Federal Communications Commission the factors of production in excess of what would be (FCC), in its most recent design of a spectrum auction, necessary to keep them in operation.
    [Show full text]