The Fluorspar Deposits of Hardin and Pope Counties, Illinois By

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Fluorspar Deposits of Hardin and Pope Counties, Illinois By 111 Hill Hill State Geological h» yfflra I I ,.":: i URBANA ILLINOIS STATE GEOLOGICAL SURVEY 3 3051 00000 1911 Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2012 with funding from University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign http://archive.org/details/fluorspardeposit58bast STATE OF ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF REGISTRATION AND EDUCATION DIVISION OF THE STATE GEOLOGICAL SURVEY M. M. LEIGHTON, Chief BULLETIN NO. 58 THE FLUORSPAR DEPOSITS OF HARDIN AND POPE COUNTIES, ILLINOIS BY EDSON S. BASTIN «XK?S25S PRINTED BY AUTHORITY OF THE STATEIOF.ILLINOIS URBANA, ILLINOIS 1931 STATE OF ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF REGISTRATION AND EDUCATION M. F. Walsh, Director BOARD OF NATURAL RESOURCES AND CONSERVATION M. F. Walsh, Chairman Edson S. Bastin, Geology Henry C. Cowles, Botany William A. Noyes, Chemistry Charles M. Thompson, Representing John W. Alvord, Engineering the President of the University of William Trelease, Biology Illinois STATE GEOLOGICAL SURVEY DIVISION M. M. Leighton, Chief Jeffersons Printing &. Stationery Co. Springfield, Illinois bs 7 CONTENTS Page Chapter I —Introduction 9 Location of district 9 Historical summary 10 Earlier geologic reports 11 Types of fluorspar deposits 12 Chapter II—Vein deposits 13 Distribution 13 Vein walls 13 Evidence of replacement 14 Ragged limestone remnants 16 Stylolitic structures 17 Diffusion banding 22 Summary 24 Minerals of the veins- 25 Fluorite 25 Calcite 25 Quartz 25 Galena 26 Sphalerite 27 Pyrite 29 Chalcopyrite 30 Barite 30 Gypsum 31 Cuprite and malachite 31 Relations between calcite and fluorite 31 Oil and bitumen in the veins 37 Vugs 38 Directional deposition in vugs 39 Two generations of fluorite 41 Purple coloration of fluorite around pyrite and chalcopyrite crystals 42 Solution cavities and "mud runs" 42 Chapter III—Blanket deposits 45 General statement 45 Distribution 45 Mining methods 45 Occurrence 46 Two types of ore 46 46 Vugs , Influence of structure 47 Influence of stratigraphy 47 Influence of texture of the country rock 48 Extent of mineralization 49 Chapter III—Continued Page Origin 49 Mineralogy of the blanket deposits 55 General 55 Primary fluorite 57 Secondary fluorite 57 Solution of primary fluorite 58 Primary calcite 58 Secondary calcite 59 Solution of primary calcite 59 Barite 60 Origin of barite 61 Quartz 62 Galena 62 Chalcopyrite 63 Marcasite 63 Oil and bitumen 64 Chapter IV—Origin of the fluorspar deposits 67 Chapter V—Mine data, vein deposits 69 Rosiclare vein 69 Vein widths 70 Behavior in depth 70 Zinc content 71 Reserves and production 71 Hillside vein 72 Mine workings > 73 Vein walls and included fragments 73 Variation along the vein 75 Faulting after mineralization : . .. 75 Production 76 Blue Diggings vein 76 Appearance of Blue Diggings vein in Daisy mine 77 Argo Vein 77 Daisy vein 78 Production 79 Dimmick prospect shaft No. 2 80 Eureka Fluorspar mine 80 Clement-Dyspeck prospects 81 Indiana or Hillside No. 2 mine 81 Martin mine 82 Webber-Wood mine 82 Preen prospect 82 Twitchell mine 82 Pell mine 83 Stewart mine 83 Baker or Eichorn mine 83 Rose mine 84 Hamp mines 84 Lee mine 84 Eureka lead mine 85 Chapter V—Continued Page F. E. Martin prospect 85 Douglas mines 85 Pierce mine 86 Empire mine 86 Wallace Millikan prospect 87 Knight mine 87 Baldwin mine 88 Crabb prospect 88 Big Joe prospect 88 Chapter VI—Mine data, blanket deposits 89 Spar Mountain mines 89 Green and Defender mines 91 Victory Fluorspar mine 91 Crystal Fluorspar mine 92 Cave in Rock mine 92 Robinson Mine 94 C. M. Miller mine 94 Renfro prospect 95 Chapter VII—Mining and milling 97 General 97 Mining 97 Milling 99 Analysis 100 Chapter VIII—Marketing, uses, and production of fluorspar 101 ILLUSTRATIONS Plate Page _ I. Topographic map of Hardin County and adjoining part of Pope County, Illinois, showing location of fluorspar mines Pocket II. Map showing principal fluorspar mines in the vicinity of Rosiclare Pocket III. Cross-section along Rosiclare vein system showing the principal shafts, levels, and stopes Pocket IV. Cross-section along Hillside vein showing the shafts, levels and stopes -facing 72 V. Plan and cross-section of Blue Diggings mine workings facing 76 VI. Plan and cross-section of Daisy mine workings facing 78 VII. Plan of principal fluorspar working at Spar Mountain facing 90 VIII. Mill flow-sheet of Rosiclare Lead and Fluorspar Mining Company .... facing 98 IX. Mill flow-sheet of Hillside Fluorspar Mines Company facing 100 Figure Page 1. Index map showing the location of the Kentucky-Illinois fluorspar district---. 9 2. Diagrammatic cross-section showing stratigraphic and structural relations in the vicinity of Rosiclare 13 3. Daisy vein in the 412-foot level of the Daisy mine 14 4. Diagrammatic sketch showing how replacement banding extends farthest into the limestone along fractures 15 5. Rock specimen showing remnants of dark gray limestone surrounded by vein calcite 17 6. Typical stylolite seam in Salem limestone 18 7. Stylolite structure in gray limestone mineralized by new calcite 19 8. White vein calcite separated by irregular stylolitic partings from gray limestone 20 9. A stylolitic parting separating light colored calcite and fluorite from dark limestone 20 10. An advanced stage of replacement of stylolitic limestone 21 11. Nearly complete replacement of stylolitic limestone 22 12. Banded ore from Cullen Mine near Salem, Kentucky 23 13. Associated vein calcite and gray limestone, traversed by stylolitic parting 23 14. Vein breccia from dump of Hillside mine 24 15. Diagrammatic representations of the sequence of mineral deposition in speci- mens from Hilside mine 26 16. Photomicrograph showing Galena veinlet replacing fluorspar 28 17. Photomicrograph showing Galena replacing calcite 28 18. Diagrams showing probable sequence of mineral deposition in specimens from Hillside mine 29 19. Sketch showing veinlet of fluorite traversing vein calcite and limestone in- clusions 32 20. Sketch showing entire width of vein at one locality in Hillside mine 32 21. Calcite vein material traversed by irregular veinlets of fluorite 33 22. Network of purple fluorite veinlets traversing calcite vein material 33 23. Mixture of calcite and fluorite in Hillside mine 34 24. Photomicrograph showing fluorite replacing calcite 35 Figure . Page 25. Photomicrograph of fine intergrowth of calcite and fluorite 36 26. Diagrams representing the sequences of mineral deposition in specimens from Hillside mine 38 27. Crystalline fluorite coated with scalenohedral crystals of calcite 39 28. Diagram representing the sequences of mineral deposition in specimens from Rosiclare and Hillside veins 41 29. V-Shaped diffusion banding in fluoritic material along small fractures 48 30. Sketch showing stylolitic structure forming boundary between limestone and fluorite '. 50 31. Microscopic stylolitic partings preserved in banded material 51 32. Photomicrograph (polarized light) of banded fluorite material from Lead Hill 52 33. Photomicrograph (natural light) of banded fluorite material from Lead Hill.. 52 34. Diffusion banding in fluorspar at Cave in Rock mine, Spar Mountain 53 35. Diffusion banding in fluoritic material from Lead Hill 54 36. Calcite crystal with barite coating 59 37. Barite replacing limestone along bedding planes 60 38. Sketches showing irregular replacement of limestone by barite 61 39. Sketch showing negative crystal faces of fluorite and inclusions of chalcopyrite, petroleum, and marcasite along transition plane from yellow to blue fluorite 63 40. Sketches of marcasite inclusions in fluorite 63 41. Main shaft and mill of Rosiclare Lead and Fluorspar Mining Company 69 42. Main shaft and mill of Hillside Fluorspar Mines Company 73' 43. Sketch showing limestone fragments in a vein in Hillside mine 74 44. Plan showing position of shafts and pits at Empire mine 86 45. Open pit at Spar Mountain, Benzon Fluorspar Company 90 46. Plan of lower workings of Cave in Rock mine 93 47. Generalized flow-sheet of a fluorspar mill 98 48. Graph showing production of fluorspar in the United States 102 THE FLUORSPAR DEPOSITS OF HARDIN AND POPE GOUNTIES, ILLINOIS By Edson S. Bastin CHAPTER I Introduction location of district One of the most important, if not the most important, fluorspar-produc- ing areas in the world comprises the southeastern part of Illinois and the western part of Kentucky and is designated as the Kentucky-Illinois district (Fig. 1). The Illinois portion of the district lies in Hardin and eastern Pope Fig. 1. Index map showing the location of the Kentucky-Illinois fluorspar district. counties, and all the important deposits in the State are near the towns of Rosiclare and Cave in Rock on Ohio River (Fig. 1 and PI. I). In Kentucky (9) 10 FLUORSPAR IN ILLINOIS the district extends over six counties, but the principal mines are in Crittenden and Livingston counties. The producing district is approximately 40 miles square. The Illinois portion of the district may be reached via Illinois Central Railroad, of which a branch line terminates at Rosiclare, or via State Highway No. 34 to Elizabethtown • and Golconda from Harrisburg, 25 miles north. HISTORICAL SUMMARY "Attention seems to have been first attracted to the Kentucky-Illinois district by the occurrence of the brilliantly colored fluorite. In early Amer- ican geologic literature there are numerous references a to this fluorspar, or "fluate of lime," as it was then called. It was usually noted as coming from Shawneetown, Illinois, as that was the nearest town of any size. The galena which occurs associated with the fluorite was probably noticed very early in the nineteenth century, but it was not until some years after the settlement of the country that any serious attempt was made to mine it. The first im- portant mining venture seems to have been that of a company headed by President Andrew Jackson, which undertook development near the site of the present Columbia mines, in 1835, in Crittenden County, Kentucky. In Illinois fluorspar seems to have been first discovered in place in 1839 when it was encountered with galena in sinking a well on the Anderson farm on 1 what is now the property of the Fairview (Franklin) Fluorspar Company." In 1842 Mr.
Recommended publications
  • Robinson Mine Plan of Operations Amendment Draft Environmental Impact Statement DOI-BLM-NV-L060-2020-0008-EIS
    Robinson Mine Plan of Operations Amendment Draft Environmental Impact Statement DOI-BLM-NV-L060-2020-0008-EIS U.S. Department of the Interior Estimated Cost to Prepare this Bureau of Land Management Draft Environmental Impact Statement Bristlecone Field Office Bureau of Land Management (Cost Recovery): 702 North Industrial Way $224,000.00 Ely, Nevada 89301-9408 Proponent: $1,016,000.00 December 2020 United States Department of the Interior BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT Ely District Office 702 North Industrial Way Ely, Nevada 89301 https://www.blm.gov/nevada In Reply Refer To: 3809 (NVL0600) NVN-68654 December 2020 Dear Reader: Attached for your review and comment is the Robinson Mine Plan of Operations Amendment Draft Environmental Impact Statement (draft EIS) prepared by the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) Ely District, Bristlecone Field Office. The BLM prepared this document to provide an objective analysis of the Proposed Action and alternatives based on the best available science and thus to inform a BLM decision about whether or not to approve a proposed amendment to the Plan of Operations for the Robinson Project (Mine Plan) as submitted to the BLM by the KGHM Robinson Nevada Mining Company (hereafter KGHM Robinson). This EIS was developed in accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA), the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976, implementing regulations, BLM’s NEPA Handbook (H-1790-1), and other applicable laws and policy. Because the notice of intent for this EIS was issued before September 14, 2020, the BLM developed this EIS in accordance with the 1978, as amended, Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) regulations for implementing NEPA (40 Code of Federal Regulations 1500–1508 from 1978, as amended in 1986 and 2006).
    [Show full text]
  • Mining Index To
    MINING INDEX TO HENDERSON, HOLLISTER, AND CANFIELD HISTORIES DENVER PUBLIC LIBRARY WESTERN HISTORY DEPARTMENT Typed and edited by Rita Torres February, 1995 MINING INDEX to Henderson, Hollister, and Canfield mining histories. Names of mines, mining companies, mining districts, lodes, veins, claims, and tunnels are indexed with page number. Call numbers are as follows: Henderson, Charles. Mining in Colorado; a history of discovery, development and production. C622.09 H38m Canfield, John. Mines and mining men of Colorado, historical, descriptive and pictorial; an account of the principal producing mines of gold and silver, the bonanza kings and successful prospectors, the picturesque camps and thriving cities of the Rocky Mountain region. C978.86 C162mi Hollister, Orvando. The mines of Colorado. C622.09 H72m A M W Abe Lincoln mine p.155c, 156b, 158a, 159b, p.57b 160b Henderson Henderson Adams & Stahl A M W mill p.230d p.160b Henderson Henderson Adams & Twibell A Y & Minnie p.232b p.23b Henderson Canfield Adams district A Y & Minnie mill p.319 p.42d, 158b, 160b Hollister Henderson Adams mill A Y & Minnie mines p.42d, 157b, 163b,c, 164b p.148a, 149d, 153a,c,d, 156c, Henderson 161d Henderson Adams mine p.43a, 153a, 156b, 158a A Y mine, Leadville Henderson p.42a, 139d, 141d, 147c, 143b, 144b Adams mining co. Henderson p.139c, 141c, 143a Henderson 1 Adelaide smelter Alabama mine p.11a p.49a Henderson Henderson Adelia lode Alamakee mine p.335 p.40b, 105c Hollister Henderson Adeline lode Alaska mine, Poughkeepsie gulch p.211 p.49a, 182c Hollister Henderson Adrian gold mining co.
    [Show full text]
  • Wind Cave National Park Geologic Resources Inventory Report
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Natural Resource Program Center Wind Cave National Park Geologic Resources Inventory Report Natural Resource Report NPS/NRPC/GRD/NRR—2009/087 THIS PAGE: Calcite Rafts record former water levels at the Deep End a remote pool discovered in January 2009. ON THE COVER: On the Candlelight Tour Route in Wind Cave boxwork protrudes from the ceiling in the Council Chamber. NPS Photos: cover photo by Dan Austin, inside photo by Even Blackstock Wind Cave National Park Geologic Resources Inventory Report Natural Resource Report NPS/NRPC/GRD/NRR—2009/087 Geologic Resources Division Natural Resource Program Center P.O. Box 25287 Denver, Colorado 80225 March 2009 U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Natural Resource Program Center Denver, Colorado The Natural Resource Publication series addresses natural resource topics that are of interest and applicability to a broad readership in the National Park Service and to others in the management of natural resources, including the scientific community, the public, and the NPS conservation and environmental constituencies. Manuscripts are peer-reviewed to ensure that the information is scientifically credible, technically accurate, appropriately written for the intended audience, and is designed and published in a professional manner. Natural Resource Reports are the designated medium for disseminating high priority, current natural resource management information with managerial application. The series targets a general, diverse audience, and may contain NPS policy considerations or address sensitive issues of management applicability. Examples of the diverse array of reports published in this series include vital signs monitoring plans; "how to" resource management papers; proceedings of resource management workshops or conferences; annual reports of resource programs or divisions of the Natural Resource Program Center; resource action plans; fact sheets; and regularly-published newsletters.
    [Show full text]
  • 4310 Hc Department of the Interior
    This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 08/06/2021 and available online at federalregister.gov/d/2021-16548, and on govinfo.gov 4310 HC DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Bureau of Land Management [LLNVL0000-L51100000-GN0000-LVEMF2105850-21X MO #4500151979] Notice of Availability of the Final Environmental Impact Statement for the Robinson Mine Plan of Operations Amendment, White Pine County, Nevada AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior. ACTION: Notice of availability. SUMMARY: In accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, as amended (NEPA), and the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976, as amended (FLPMA), the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) Ely District (EYDO), Nevada, has prepared a Final Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for the Robinson Mine Plan of Operations Amendment project and by this notice is announcing its availability. DATES: The BLM will not issue a final decision on the proposal for a minimum of 30 days after the Environmental Protection Agency publishes its notice of availability of the Robinson Mine Plan of Operations Amendment Final EIS DOI-BLM-NV-L060-2020- 0008-EIS in the Federal Register. ADDRESSES: Copies of Robinson Mine Plan of Operations Amendment and the Final EIS are available for public inspection on the internet at https://go.usa.gov/xvYad. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For questions about the proposed project contact Ms. Tiera Arbogast, Planning & Environmental Coordinator, Bureau of Land Management Ely District Office, telephone 775-289-1872, email: [email protected], or address: 702 North Industrial Way, Ely, Nevada 89301. Persons who use a telecommunications device for the deaf (TDD) may call the Federal Relay Service (FRS) at 1-800-877-8339 to contact Ms.
    [Show full text]
  • Failure to Capture and Treat Wastewater
    U.S. OPERATING COPPER MINES: FAILURE TO CAPTURE & TREAT WASTEWATER BY BONNIE GESTRING, MAY 2019 In 2012, Earthworks released a report documenting the failure to capture and treat mine wastewater at U.S. operating copper mines accounting for 89% of U.S. copper production.1 The report found that 92% failed to capture and control mine wastewater, resulting in significant water quality impacts. This is an update to that effort. We reviewed government and industry documents for fifteen operating open-pit copper mines, representing 99% of U.S. copper production in 2015 – the most recent data on copper production available from the U.S. Geological Survey (see Table 1). Our research found similar results: 14 out of 15 (93%) failed to capture and control wastewater, resulting in significant water quality impacts (see TaBle 2). These unauthorized wastewater releases occurred from a number of different sources including uncontrolled seepage from tailings impoundments, waste rock piles, open pits, or other mine facilities, or failure of water treatment facilities, pipeline failures or other accidental releases. TABLE 1: Copper production from top 15 (as of 2015) U.S. open-pit copper mines (most recent data availaBle from USGS).2 MINE PRODUCTION (metric tons) Morenci 481,000 Chino 142,000 Safford 91,600 Bagdad 95,300 Bingham Canyon 92,000 Sierrita 85,700 Ray 75,100 Pinto Valley 60,400 Mission CompleX 68,300 Robinson 56,800 Tyrone 38,100 Continental pit 31,000 PhoeniX 21,100 Miami 19,500 Silver Bell 19,300 Total (99% of U.S. production) 1,377,000 U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • MINERAL RESOURCES and RESERVES REPORT As at December 31, 2014
    MINERAL RESOURCES AND RESERVES REPORT as at December 31, 2014 June, 2015 2 Dear Stakeholders, With undisguised pleasure and satisfaction, I have the privilege to present you with the first edition of our Mineral Resources and Reserves Report. This report consolidates and systematizes information regarding the mineral resources and mineral reserves managed by KGHM Polska Miedź S.A. (KGHM). By applying clear and consistent methodology in its preparation, we hope the report will provide you with a complete and comprehensive picture of the Company’s portfolio of mining assets and mine development projects. The development of KGHM over the past 60 years has been based on the quality and quantity of its resource base. Thanks to effective exploration and management, during the last decade KGHM has become a global, geographically diversified mining company. The mineral resources and reserves presented in this report ensure KGHM of sustainable global operations in the coming decades. As the development of our resource base is fundamental for achievement of our strategy, in the coming years we intend to carry out one of the most extensive exploration campaigns in our history, in order to enable us to identify additional mineral deposits to be described in subsequent editions of this report. Sincerely, Herbert Wirth President and CEO 3 Table of Contents Disclaimer………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 5 Introduction…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….………. 6 Conversion of Resources and Reserves …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Environmental Assessment for the Issuance of an Eagle Take Permit for Robinson Mine
    U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Draft Environmental Assessment for the Issuance of an Eagle Take Permit for Robinson Mine Nevada Prepared by: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Pacific Southwest Region Division of Migratory Bird Management U.S. Department of the Interior 2800 Cottage Way, W-1916, Sacramento, CA 95825 Contact: <[email protected]>, 916-414-6509 December 2020 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 Introduction ........................................................................................................................1 1.1 Purpose and Need ....................................................................................................2 1.2 Authorities................................................................................................................2 1.3 Background ..............................................................................................................2 1.4 Scoping, Consultation, and Coordination ................................................................5 1.5 Tribal Coordination ..................................................................................................5 2.0 Alternatives .........................................................................................................................6 2.1 Applicant Alternative ...............................................................................................6 2.1.1 Compensatory Mitigation ............................................................................6 2.1.2 Monitoring and Adaptative Management
    [Show full text]
  • Download PDF About Minerals Sorted by Mineral Group
    MINERALS SORTED BY MINERAL GROUP Most minerals are chemically classified as native elements, sulfides, sulfates, oxides, silicates, carbonates, phosphates, halides, nitrates, tungstates, molybdates, arsenates, or vanadates. More information on and photographs of these minerals in Kentucky is available in the book “Rocks and Minerals of Kentucky” (Anderson, 1994). NATIVE ELEMENTS (DIAMOND, SULFUR, GOLD) Native elements are minerals composed of only one element, such as copper, sulfur, gold, silver, and diamond. They are not common in Kentucky, but are mentioned because of their appeal to collectors. DIAMOND Crystal system: isometric. Cleavage: perfect octahedral. Color: colorless, pale shades of yellow, orange, or blue. Hardness: 10. Specific gravity: 3.5. Uses: jewelry, saws, polishing equipment. Diamond, the hardest of any naturally formed mineral, is also highly refractive, causing light to be split into a spectrum of colors commonly called play of colors. Because of its high specific gravity, it is easily concentrated in alluvial gravels, where it can be mined. This is one of the main mining methods used in South Africa, where most of the world's diamonds originate. The source rock of diamonds is the igneous rock kimberlite, also referred to as diamond pipe. A nongem variety of diamond is called bort. Kentucky has kimberlites in Elliott County in eastern Kentucky and Crittenden and Livingston Counties in western Kentucky, but no diamonds have ever been discovered in or authenticated from these rocks. A diamond was found in Adair County, but it was determined to have been brought in from somewhere else. SULFUR Crystal system: orthorhombic. Fracture: uneven. Color: yellow. Hardness 1 to 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Mineral Flow Chart
    Mohs Hardness Scale Vitreous Luster, any color can occur. Tools Conchoidal fracture, hexagonal crystals Quartz 10. Diamond common, Hardness 7 9. Corundum 8. Topaz Barrel shaped hexagonal crystals, Hardness 9, Corundum 7. Quartz Commonly brown 6. Orthoclase Streak Plate 5.5 Glass Plate Color often dark red or reddish brown. Vitreous 5. Apatite Dodecahedron luster. Fracture may resemble poor cleavage, Garnet 4.5 Steel Nail Crystal Balls 4. Fluorite Hardness 7-7.5 3.5 Copper Penny 3. Calcite Green Sand Vitreous luster, commonly in granular masses 2.5 Finger Nail Olivine 2. Gypsum Grains (looks like sand grains), Hardness 6.5-7 1. Talc Vitreous, resinous, or dull luster. Red-brown to No Forms X-shaped brownish-black. Prismatic and Staurolite Cleavage crystals X or cross shaped crystals Vitreous Luster, Light Blue. Hardness 5 1 Direction Blue Blades parallel to crystal, 7 perpendicular. Blade Kyanite shaped crystals Cleavage Bluish green. Hardness 7.5-8. Elongate six- difficult to Beryl sided crystal prisms with flat ends common determine Harder Than 2 directions not Vitreous luster, dark green or black. Cleavage Hornblende Glass at 90 planes at 56 and 124 degrees. Vitreous to dull luster, black to dark green. Cleavage Augite Tends to look "blocky" Vitreous Luster, darker colors, hardness 6. Plagioclase Striations Striations visible on cleavage face (Ca-Plag) 2 directions at Vitreous Luster, light colors often, hardness 6. Plagioclase Dissolution lines 90 Dissolution lines visible (Na-Plag) Potassium Non- Cleavage Vitreous Luster, Usually pink. Hardness 6. Feldspar Metallic Next Page (K-Spar) Red-brown Strong red- Earthy luster and strong red color Hematite Streak brown streak Softer Than Yellow/ Light Earthy Luster, found in earthy masses, Limonite Glass Brown Streak Hardness 1 Bright Yellow Resinous or vitreous luster.
    [Show full text]
  • The Development of a Technology-Infused 5Th-8Th Grade Earth
    THE DEVELOPMENT OF A TECHNOLOGY-INFUSED 5th -8th GRADE EARTH SCIENCE CURRICULUM FOCUSING ON CAVES CURRICULUM PROJECT Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Master of Education in Environmental Education in the College of Education and Human Services Professions By Noelle J. Grunwald, B.S. University of Minnesota Duluth October 2014 Curriculum Project Committee: Bruce H. Munson, Ph.D., Chair Julie Ernst, Ph.D. Terrie Shannon, Ph.D. ii Abstract Traditional interpretive and educational programs within the National Park Service, a bureau of the United States Department of the Interior, have been developed on the principle that when people interact firsthand with the tangible resources found within National Park Service (NPS) sites they come to understand the meanings, concepts, stories, and relationships pertaining to these places better. While a direct physical connection to America’s national parks is desired, it is not always feasible. As a result, the NPS has embraced the Internet and the World Wide Web as a valuable and effective tool to reach out and engage visitors, specifically those who may never set foot inside a park’s boundaries. Many sites within the national park system are adapting technology to enhance place-based learning in park settings and at a distance (USNPS, 2006). The purpose of this study was to address the current programming needs of the interpretation and education division staff at Wind Cave National Park in South Dakota by developing a curriculum that utilized the Internet and educational technology to reach out, engage and provide memorable and meaningful learning experiences regarding caves and karst topography to formal educators and their classrooms.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Release of Subsurface Management Plan
    Oregon Caves National Monument Subsurface Management Plan 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION A. Purpose and Significance........................................................................................ 4 B. Legislative and Administrative Requirements......................................................... 5 II. PRESENT RESOURCE STATUS............................................................................. 7 III. DATA COLLECTION A. Cave Classification………………………………………………………………... 12 B. Inventories…………………………………………………………………………. 12 IV. RESOURCE PROTECTION A. Visitor Use 1. Carrying Capacity……………………………………….……………………….12 2. Caving Permits…………………………………………………………………. 13 B. Interpretation 1. Publications............................................................................................ 15 2. Interpretive Tours................................................................................... 16 3. Outreach Programs................................................................................ 16 4. Audio-visual.......................................................................................... 16 5. Visitor Survey....................................................................................... 16 C. Ranger Patrols.......................................................................................................... 17 D. Cave Locations.................................. E. Gates......................................................................................................................... 18 F. Cave Alteration........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Caves Beautiful Rushmore Cave, Keystone Beautiful Wonderland Cave, Nemo Back Hills Caverns, Rapid City Crystal Cave Park, Rapid
    Caves Beautiful Rushmore Cave, Keystone Beautiful Wonderland Cave, Nemo Back Hills Caverns, Rapid City Crystal Cave Park, Rapid City Jewel Cave National Monument, Custer- pay for tour only, no need for a national park pass Wind Cave National Park, Hot Springs- pay for tour only, no need for a national park pass Notice the list of commercial caves able to be visited. Circling the Black hills is a belt of limestone caves. Great tectonic forces caused magma to be pushed up, revealing the granite basement rocks. The limestone that encircles this granite is gently tipped. Jewel Cave National Monument with 142 miles of mapped passages is known for its calcite crystal formations of dogtooth spar and nailhead spar. Wind Cave National Park has 128 miles of passages with the rare crystal formations of boxwork. The other Black Hills caves offer other cave formations such as stalagmites, columns, flowstone, frostwork, and cave popcorn. Caves How are caves formed? Erosion does not happen only on the surface; it can happen underground too. Groundwater can erode rock, especially limestone resulting in caves. Once the cave is formed the decorating begins, dripping water from the ceiling may leave a deposit forming an icicle-like structure hanging down (stalactite). This water may drip down to the floor leaving a deposit and forming a stalagmite. When groundwater dissolves limestone, it must eventually redeposit it. Since cave formations are formed drop by drop, it is often assumed that it took million of years for these formations to form. However, in the basement of the Lincoln Memorial and other places there are both stalactites and stalagmites; these did not take millions of years to develop, just the right conditions.
    [Show full text]