The Fluorspar Deposits of Hardin and Pope Counties, Illinois By
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Robinson Mine Plan of Operations Amendment Draft Environmental Impact Statement DOI-BLM-NV-L060-2020-0008-EIS
Robinson Mine Plan of Operations Amendment Draft Environmental Impact Statement DOI-BLM-NV-L060-2020-0008-EIS U.S. Department of the Interior Estimated Cost to Prepare this Bureau of Land Management Draft Environmental Impact Statement Bristlecone Field Office Bureau of Land Management (Cost Recovery): 702 North Industrial Way $224,000.00 Ely, Nevada 89301-9408 Proponent: $1,016,000.00 December 2020 United States Department of the Interior BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT Ely District Office 702 North Industrial Way Ely, Nevada 89301 https://www.blm.gov/nevada In Reply Refer To: 3809 (NVL0600) NVN-68654 December 2020 Dear Reader: Attached for your review and comment is the Robinson Mine Plan of Operations Amendment Draft Environmental Impact Statement (draft EIS) prepared by the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) Ely District, Bristlecone Field Office. The BLM prepared this document to provide an objective analysis of the Proposed Action and alternatives based on the best available science and thus to inform a BLM decision about whether or not to approve a proposed amendment to the Plan of Operations for the Robinson Project (Mine Plan) as submitted to the BLM by the KGHM Robinson Nevada Mining Company (hereafter KGHM Robinson). This EIS was developed in accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA), the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976, implementing regulations, BLM’s NEPA Handbook (H-1790-1), and other applicable laws and policy. Because the notice of intent for this EIS was issued before September 14, 2020, the BLM developed this EIS in accordance with the 1978, as amended, Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) regulations for implementing NEPA (40 Code of Federal Regulations 1500–1508 from 1978, as amended in 1986 and 2006). -
Mining Index To
MINING INDEX TO HENDERSON, HOLLISTER, AND CANFIELD HISTORIES DENVER PUBLIC LIBRARY WESTERN HISTORY DEPARTMENT Typed and edited by Rita Torres February, 1995 MINING INDEX to Henderson, Hollister, and Canfield mining histories. Names of mines, mining companies, mining districts, lodes, veins, claims, and tunnels are indexed with page number. Call numbers are as follows: Henderson, Charles. Mining in Colorado; a history of discovery, development and production. C622.09 H38m Canfield, John. Mines and mining men of Colorado, historical, descriptive and pictorial; an account of the principal producing mines of gold and silver, the bonanza kings and successful prospectors, the picturesque camps and thriving cities of the Rocky Mountain region. C978.86 C162mi Hollister, Orvando. The mines of Colorado. C622.09 H72m A M W Abe Lincoln mine p.155c, 156b, 158a, 159b, p.57b 160b Henderson Henderson Adams & Stahl A M W mill p.230d p.160b Henderson Henderson Adams & Twibell A Y & Minnie p.232b p.23b Henderson Canfield Adams district A Y & Minnie mill p.319 p.42d, 158b, 160b Hollister Henderson Adams mill A Y & Minnie mines p.42d, 157b, 163b,c, 164b p.148a, 149d, 153a,c,d, 156c, Henderson 161d Henderson Adams mine p.43a, 153a, 156b, 158a A Y mine, Leadville Henderson p.42a, 139d, 141d, 147c, 143b, 144b Adams mining co. Henderson p.139c, 141c, 143a Henderson 1 Adelaide smelter Alabama mine p.11a p.49a Henderson Henderson Adelia lode Alamakee mine p.335 p.40b, 105c Hollister Henderson Adeline lode Alaska mine, Poughkeepsie gulch p.211 p.49a, 182c Hollister Henderson Adrian gold mining co. -
Wind Cave National Park Geologic Resources Inventory Report
National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Natural Resource Program Center Wind Cave National Park Geologic Resources Inventory Report Natural Resource Report NPS/NRPC/GRD/NRR—2009/087 THIS PAGE: Calcite Rafts record former water levels at the Deep End a remote pool discovered in January 2009. ON THE COVER: On the Candlelight Tour Route in Wind Cave boxwork protrudes from the ceiling in the Council Chamber. NPS Photos: cover photo by Dan Austin, inside photo by Even Blackstock Wind Cave National Park Geologic Resources Inventory Report Natural Resource Report NPS/NRPC/GRD/NRR—2009/087 Geologic Resources Division Natural Resource Program Center P.O. Box 25287 Denver, Colorado 80225 March 2009 U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Natural Resource Program Center Denver, Colorado The Natural Resource Publication series addresses natural resource topics that are of interest and applicability to a broad readership in the National Park Service and to others in the management of natural resources, including the scientific community, the public, and the NPS conservation and environmental constituencies. Manuscripts are peer-reviewed to ensure that the information is scientifically credible, technically accurate, appropriately written for the intended audience, and is designed and published in a professional manner. Natural Resource Reports are the designated medium for disseminating high priority, current natural resource management information with managerial application. The series targets a general, diverse audience, and may contain NPS policy considerations or address sensitive issues of management applicability. Examples of the diverse array of reports published in this series include vital signs monitoring plans; "how to" resource management papers; proceedings of resource management workshops or conferences; annual reports of resource programs or divisions of the Natural Resource Program Center; resource action plans; fact sheets; and regularly-published newsletters. -
4310 Hc Department of the Interior
This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 08/06/2021 and available online at federalregister.gov/d/2021-16548, and on govinfo.gov 4310 HC DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Bureau of Land Management [LLNVL0000-L51100000-GN0000-LVEMF2105850-21X MO #4500151979] Notice of Availability of the Final Environmental Impact Statement for the Robinson Mine Plan of Operations Amendment, White Pine County, Nevada AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior. ACTION: Notice of availability. SUMMARY: In accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, as amended (NEPA), and the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976, as amended (FLPMA), the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) Ely District (EYDO), Nevada, has prepared a Final Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for the Robinson Mine Plan of Operations Amendment project and by this notice is announcing its availability. DATES: The BLM will not issue a final decision on the proposal for a minimum of 30 days after the Environmental Protection Agency publishes its notice of availability of the Robinson Mine Plan of Operations Amendment Final EIS DOI-BLM-NV-L060-2020- 0008-EIS in the Federal Register. ADDRESSES: Copies of Robinson Mine Plan of Operations Amendment and the Final EIS are available for public inspection on the internet at https://go.usa.gov/xvYad. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For questions about the proposed project contact Ms. Tiera Arbogast, Planning & Environmental Coordinator, Bureau of Land Management Ely District Office, telephone 775-289-1872, email: [email protected], or address: 702 North Industrial Way, Ely, Nevada 89301. Persons who use a telecommunications device for the deaf (TDD) may call the Federal Relay Service (FRS) at 1-800-877-8339 to contact Ms. -
Failure to Capture and Treat Wastewater
U.S. OPERATING COPPER MINES: FAILURE TO CAPTURE & TREAT WASTEWATER BY BONNIE GESTRING, MAY 2019 In 2012, Earthworks released a report documenting the failure to capture and treat mine wastewater at U.S. operating copper mines accounting for 89% of U.S. copper production.1 The report found that 92% failed to capture and control mine wastewater, resulting in significant water quality impacts. This is an update to that effort. We reviewed government and industry documents for fifteen operating open-pit copper mines, representing 99% of U.S. copper production in 2015 – the most recent data on copper production available from the U.S. Geological Survey (see Table 1). Our research found similar results: 14 out of 15 (93%) failed to capture and control wastewater, resulting in significant water quality impacts (see TaBle 2). These unauthorized wastewater releases occurred from a number of different sources including uncontrolled seepage from tailings impoundments, waste rock piles, open pits, or other mine facilities, or failure of water treatment facilities, pipeline failures or other accidental releases. TABLE 1: Copper production from top 15 (as of 2015) U.S. open-pit copper mines (most recent data availaBle from USGS).2 MINE PRODUCTION (metric tons) Morenci 481,000 Chino 142,000 Safford 91,600 Bagdad 95,300 Bingham Canyon 92,000 Sierrita 85,700 Ray 75,100 Pinto Valley 60,400 Mission CompleX 68,300 Robinson 56,800 Tyrone 38,100 Continental pit 31,000 PhoeniX 21,100 Miami 19,500 Silver Bell 19,300 Total (99% of U.S. production) 1,377,000 U.S. -
MINERAL RESOURCES and RESERVES REPORT As at December 31, 2014
MINERAL RESOURCES AND RESERVES REPORT as at December 31, 2014 June, 2015 2 Dear Stakeholders, With undisguised pleasure and satisfaction, I have the privilege to present you with the first edition of our Mineral Resources and Reserves Report. This report consolidates and systematizes information regarding the mineral resources and mineral reserves managed by KGHM Polska Miedź S.A. (KGHM). By applying clear and consistent methodology in its preparation, we hope the report will provide you with a complete and comprehensive picture of the Company’s portfolio of mining assets and mine development projects. The development of KGHM over the past 60 years has been based on the quality and quantity of its resource base. Thanks to effective exploration and management, during the last decade KGHM has become a global, geographically diversified mining company. The mineral resources and reserves presented in this report ensure KGHM of sustainable global operations in the coming decades. As the development of our resource base is fundamental for achievement of our strategy, in the coming years we intend to carry out one of the most extensive exploration campaigns in our history, in order to enable us to identify additional mineral deposits to be described in subsequent editions of this report. Sincerely, Herbert Wirth President and CEO 3 Table of Contents Disclaimer………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 5 Introduction…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….………. 6 Conversion of Resources and Reserves ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… -
Draft Environmental Assessment for the Issuance of an Eagle Take Permit for Robinson Mine
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Draft Environmental Assessment for the Issuance of an Eagle Take Permit for Robinson Mine Nevada Prepared by: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Pacific Southwest Region Division of Migratory Bird Management U.S. Department of the Interior 2800 Cottage Way, W-1916, Sacramento, CA 95825 Contact: <[email protected]>, 916-414-6509 December 2020 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 Introduction ........................................................................................................................1 1.1 Purpose and Need ....................................................................................................2 1.2 Authorities................................................................................................................2 1.3 Background ..............................................................................................................2 1.4 Scoping, Consultation, and Coordination ................................................................5 1.5 Tribal Coordination ..................................................................................................5 2.0 Alternatives .........................................................................................................................6 2.1 Applicant Alternative ...............................................................................................6 2.1.1 Compensatory Mitigation ............................................................................6 2.1.2 Monitoring and Adaptative Management -
Download PDF About Minerals Sorted by Mineral Group
MINERALS SORTED BY MINERAL GROUP Most minerals are chemically classified as native elements, sulfides, sulfates, oxides, silicates, carbonates, phosphates, halides, nitrates, tungstates, molybdates, arsenates, or vanadates. More information on and photographs of these minerals in Kentucky is available in the book “Rocks and Minerals of Kentucky” (Anderson, 1994). NATIVE ELEMENTS (DIAMOND, SULFUR, GOLD) Native elements are minerals composed of only one element, such as copper, sulfur, gold, silver, and diamond. They are not common in Kentucky, but are mentioned because of their appeal to collectors. DIAMOND Crystal system: isometric. Cleavage: perfect octahedral. Color: colorless, pale shades of yellow, orange, or blue. Hardness: 10. Specific gravity: 3.5. Uses: jewelry, saws, polishing equipment. Diamond, the hardest of any naturally formed mineral, is also highly refractive, causing light to be split into a spectrum of colors commonly called play of colors. Because of its high specific gravity, it is easily concentrated in alluvial gravels, where it can be mined. This is one of the main mining methods used in South Africa, where most of the world's diamonds originate. The source rock of diamonds is the igneous rock kimberlite, also referred to as diamond pipe. A nongem variety of diamond is called bort. Kentucky has kimberlites in Elliott County in eastern Kentucky and Crittenden and Livingston Counties in western Kentucky, but no diamonds have ever been discovered in or authenticated from these rocks. A diamond was found in Adair County, but it was determined to have been brought in from somewhere else. SULFUR Crystal system: orthorhombic. Fracture: uneven. Color: yellow. Hardness 1 to 2. -
Mineral Flow Chart
Mohs Hardness Scale Vitreous Luster, any color can occur. Tools Conchoidal fracture, hexagonal crystals Quartz 10. Diamond common, Hardness 7 9. Corundum 8. Topaz Barrel shaped hexagonal crystals, Hardness 9, Corundum 7. Quartz Commonly brown 6. Orthoclase Streak Plate 5.5 Glass Plate Color often dark red or reddish brown. Vitreous 5. Apatite Dodecahedron luster. Fracture may resemble poor cleavage, Garnet 4.5 Steel Nail Crystal Balls 4. Fluorite Hardness 7-7.5 3.5 Copper Penny 3. Calcite Green Sand Vitreous luster, commonly in granular masses 2.5 Finger Nail Olivine 2. Gypsum Grains (looks like sand grains), Hardness 6.5-7 1. Talc Vitreous, resinous, or dull luster. Red-brown to No Forms X-shaped brownish-black. Prismatic and Staurolite Cleavage crystals X or cross shaped crystals Vitreous Luster, Light Blue. Hardness 5 1 Direction Blue Blades parallel to crystal, 7 perpendicular. Blade Kyanite shaped crystals Cleavage Bluish green. Hardness 7.5-8. Elongate six- difficult to Beryl sided crystal prisms with flat ends common determine Harder Than 2 directions not Vitreous luster, dark green or black. Cleavage Hornblende Glass at 90 planes at 56 and 124 degrees. Vitreous to dull luster, black to dark green. Cleavage Augite Tends to look "blocky" Vitreous Luster, darker colors, hardness 6. Plagioclase Striations Striations visible on cleavage face (Ca-Plag) 2 directions at Vitreous Luster, light colors often, hardness 6. Plagioclase Dissolution lines 90 Dissolution lines visible (Na-Plag) Potassium Non- Cleavage Vitreous Luster, Usually pink. Hardness 6. Feldspar Metallic Next Page (K-Spar) Red-brown Strong red- Earthy luster and strong red color Hematite Streak brown streak Softer Than Yellow/ Light Earthy Luster, found in earthy masses, Limonite Glass Brown Streak Hardness 1 Bright Yellow Resinous or vitreous luster. -
The Development of a Technology-Infused 5Th-8Th Grade Earth
THE DEVELOPMENT OF A TECHNOLOGY-INFUSED 5th -8th GRADE EARTH SCIENCE CURRICULUM FOCUSING ON CAVES CURRICULUM PROJECT Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Master of Education in Environmental Education in the College of Education and Human Services Professions By Noelle J. Grunwald, B.S. University of Minnesota Duluth October 2014 Curriculum Project Committee: Bruce H. Munson, Ph.D., Chair Julie Ernst, Ph.D. Terrie Shannon, Ph.D. ii Abstract Traditional interpretive and educational programs within the National Park Service, a bureau of the United States Department of the Interior, have been developed on the principle that when people interact firsthand with the tangible resources found within National Park Service (NPS) sites they come to understand the meanings, concepts, stories, and relationships pertaining to these places better. While a direct physical connection to America’s national parks is desired, it is not always feasible. As a result, the NPS has embraced the Internet and the World Wide Web as a valuable and effective tool to reach out and engage visitors, specifically those who may never set foot inside a park’s boundaries. Many sites within the national park system are adapting technology to enhance place-based learning in park settings and at a distance (USNPS, 2006). The purpose of this study was to address the current programming needs of the interpretation and education division staff at Wind Cave National Park in South Dakota by developing a curriculum that utilized the Internet and educational technology to reach out, engage and provide memorable and meaningful learning experiences regarding caves and karst topography to formal educators and their classrooms. -
Public Release of Subsurface Management Plan
Oregon Caves National Monument Subsurface Management Plan 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION A. Purpose and Significance........................................................................................ 4 B. Legislative and Administrative Requirements......................................................... 5 II. PRESENT RESOURCE STATUS............................................................................. 7 III. DATA COLLECTION A. Cave Classification………………………………………………………………... 12 B. Inventories…………………………………………………………………………. 12 IV. RESOURCE PROTECTION A. Visitor Use 1. Carrying Capacity……………………………………….……………………….12 2. Caving Permits…………………………………………………………………. 13 B. Interpretation 1. Publications............................................................................................ 15 2. Interpretive Tours................................................................................... 16 3. Outreach Programs................................................................................ 16 4. Audio-visual.......................................................................................... 16 5. Visitor Survey....................................................................................... 16 C. Ranger Patrols.......................................................................................................... 17 D. Cave Locations.................................. E. Gates......................................................................................................................... 18 F. Cave Alteration........................................................................................................ -
Caves Beautiful Rushmore Cave, Keystone Beautiful Wonderland Cave, Nemo Back Hills Caverns, Rapid City Crystal Cave Park, Rapid
Caves Beautiful Rushmore Cave, Keystone Beautiful Wonderland Cave, Nemo Back Hills Caverns, Rapid City Crystal Cave Park, Rapid City Jewel Cave National Monument, Custer- pay for tour only, no need for a national park pass Wind Cave National Park, Hot Springs- pay for tour only, no need for a national park pass Notice the list of commercial caves able to be visited. Circling the Black hills is a belt of limestone caves. Great tectonic forces caused magma to be pushed up, revealing the granite basement rocks. The limestone that encircles this granite is gently tipped. Jewel Cave National Monument with 142 miles of mapped passages is known for its calcite crystal formations of dogtooth spar and nailhead spar. Wind Cave National Park has 128 miles of passages with the rare crystal formations of boxwork. The other Black Hills caves offer other cave formations such as stalagmites, columns, flowstone, frostwork, and cave popcorn. Caves How are caves formed? Erosion does not happen only on the surface; it can happen underground too. Groundwater can erode rock, especially limestone resulting in caves. Once the cave is formed the decorating begins, dripping water from the ceiling may leave a deposit forming an icicle-like structure hanging down (stalactite). This water may drip down to the floor leaving a deposit and forming a stalagmite. When groundwater dissolves limestone, it must eventually redeposit it. Since cave formations are formed drop by drop, it is often assumed that it took million of years for these formations to form. However, in the basement of the Lincoln Memorial and other places there are both stalactites and stalagmites; these did not take millions of years to develop, just the right conditions.