Public Release of Subsurface Management Plan

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Public Release of Subsurface Management Plan Oregon Caves National Monument Subsurface Management Plan 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION A. Purpose and Significance........................................................................................ 4 B. Legislative and Administrative Requirements......................................................... 5 II. PRESENT RESOURCE STATUS............................................................................. 7 III. DATA COLLECTION A. Cave Classification………………………………………………………………... 12 B. Inventories…………………………………………………………………………. 12 IV. RESOURCE PROTECTION A. Visitor Use 1. Carrying Capacity……………………………………….……………………….12 2. Caving Permits…………………………………………………………………. 13 B. Interpretation 1. Publications............................................................................................ 15 2. Interpretive Tours................................................................................... 16 3. Outreach Programs................................................................................ 16 4. Audio-visual.......................................................................................... 16 5. Visitor Survey....................................................................................... 16 C. Ranger Patrols.......................................................................................................... 17 D. Cave Locations.................................. E. Gates......................................................................................................................... 18 F. Cave Alteration......................................................................................................... 18 G. Maintenance............................................................................................................. 18 H. Subsurface Restoration.............................................................................................19 1. Rubble Removal.....................................................................................................19 2. Non-native Species Control…………………………………………………….. 22 3. Electrical Features………………………………………………………………. 24 4. Cave Pools............................................................................................................ 24 5. Particulates............................................................................................................ 25 6. Air Flow.................................... 7. Speleothem and Wallrock Repair......................................................................... 26 8. Water Flow........................................................................................................... 27 2 9. Oxidation.............................................................................................................. 27 10. Organics................................................................................................................ 27 I. Health and Safety V. NPS STAFF RESPONSIBILITIES A. Individual Position Responsibilities........................................................................ 30 B. Training.................................................................................................................... 34 C. Interagency Collaboration........................................................................................ 34 VI. MANAGEMENT OBJECTIVES……………………..……………………… 35 VII. INVENTORY AND MONITORING 1. Cave Identification....................................................................................... 45 2. Survey and Exploration Standards........... …………………………….. 46 3. Cave Files........... .........………………………………………….…….. 51 4. Monitoring a. Visitor Use.......................................................................................... 52 b. Audio-visual....................................................................................... 53 c. Water................................................................................................... 53 d. Safety (1) Caving and Climbing.................................................................. 54 (2) Search and Rescue...................................................................... 54 (3) Radon.......................................................................................... 54 (4) Rock Stress.................................................................................. 54 e. Natural Resources…………………….…………………………… 55 VIII. REVISIONS TO PLAN...................................................................................... 99 IX. BIBLIOGRAPHY ………………………………….…….……………….. ..... 96 Glossary…………………………………………………..……………………….……...104 3 I. INTRODUCTION Oregon Caves National Monument, in southwestern Oregon, is located in the Siskiyou Mountains. Of the caves on the Monument, Oregon Caves, hereafter referred to as the Cave, is by far the largest and the only one in which public tours are given. With about 4.8 kilometers (three miles) of known passage, it is also one of the largest caves in the Pacific Northwest. The Monument’s subsurface has complex geologic and biologic features and processes, most of which are explained more fully in the glossary and other sections of this document. A. Purpose and Significance The purpose of the Monument is defined by President William H. Taft's 1909 proclamation that established Oregon Caves as a National Monument: "Oregon Caves...are of unusual scientific interest and importance, and it appears that the public interests will be promoted by reserving these caves with as much land as may be necessary for the proper protection thereof." Underwater and stream solution enlarged narrow crack in marble to form the Cave sometime between a few million to half a million years ago. Bedrock, water, climate, and human developments are the main influences on the subsurface. A year-round underground stream and seepage from the Cave’s ceiling both respond within hours to weeks to a rainfall or snow melting event. Although not noted for large, cave-adapted animals, the Cave supports subspecies of the Townsend's Big-eared Bat, which is state listed, and several cave-adapted arthropods endemic to the Monument. Many subsurface processes are closely tied to the surface. Natural subsurface communities are largely dependent on food from the surface and outside air strongly affects formation growth. Even though the focus of the Monument is that of its showcave, there are other caves and underground resources that the Park Service is mandated to protect. For examples, a family of soil millipedes is known only from the Monument, there likely is a groundwater amphipod known only from the Monument, and the hyporheic in sediment in streams likely has geographically restricted water mites. Although surface processes also affect subsurface areas, the inclusion of subsurface areas with similar geological processes and biologic groups of animals (guilds) and the exclusion of the surface make this management plan manageable in congruence and size, respectively. B. Legislative and Administrative Requirements The plan follows various laws, regulations, policies and other guidelines. All or most topics are covered in Director’s Order #2 (Park Planning), #6 (Interpretation), #7 (Volunteers in Parks), #9 (Law Enforcement Program), #12 (Conservation Planning, Environmental Impact Analysis and Decision Making), #14 (Resource Damage Assessment and Restoration), #20 4 (Agreements), #24 Museum Collections Management), #25 (Land Protection), 42 (Accessibility for Visitors with Disabilities in NPS Programs, Facilities and Services), #48A (Concession Management), #48B (Commercial Use Authorizations), #50D (Smoking Policy), 52C (Park Signage), 53 (Special Park Uses), #55 (Interpreting the NPS Organic Act), #66 (FOIA and Protected Resource Information), #74 (Studies and Collecting), #75 (Media Relations), #75A Civic Engagement and Public Involvement), #77 (Natural Resource Protection), #77-6 (Comprehensive Research and Development Agreements), #84 (Library Management), #90 (Value Analysis), #92 (Human Resources), #93 (Conflict Resolution). National Parks and Recreation Act of 1978 (P.L. 95-625); Federal Caves Resources Protection Act (P.L. 100-691); Lechuguilla Cave Protection Act of 1993 (P.L. 103-169); National Parks and Recreation Act of 1978 (P.L. 95-625); National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (1970) (P. L. 91-184); Federal Advisory Committee Act; NPS Organic Act; General Authorities Act (16 USC 1a-8); Air Quality: Clean Air Act (33USC 1251 et seq.); Director’s Order #47 (Sound Preservation and Noise Management Cave Formations: Federal Caves Resources Protection Act (P.L. 100-691) Cultural Values: Archaeological Resources Protection Act of 1979 (P.L. 96-95): Historic Sites Act of 1935 (P.L. 86-523); Director’s Order #28B (Archeology); #28 (Cultural Resource Management)m abd #71A (Relationships with Indian Tribes) and #78 (Social Science); Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act of 1990 (P.L. 101-601) Education: Director’s Orders #6 (Interpretation), #29 (Ethnography Program), #52A (Communicating the NPS Mission), 52B (Graphic Design Standards), #70 (Internet and Intranet Publishing), #78 (Social Science), #82 (Public Use Reporting); National Parks and Recreation Act of 1978 (P.L. 95-625); NPS-77 Fossils: NPS Organic Act; General Authorities Act (16 USC 1a-8); NPS-77 Mineralogy: Federal Caves Resources Protection Act (P.L. 100-691) Safety: Director’s Order #50B (Occupational Safety and Health Program, #51 (Emergency Medical Services), #59 (Search and Rescue),
Recommended publications
  • Anisodactylus Binotatus Fabr., a Carabid Beetle New to New Zealand, and a Review of the Exotic Carabid Fauna
    Pacific Insects 5 (4) : 837-847 December 30, 1963 ANISODACTYLUS BINOTATUS FABR., A CARABID BEETLE NEW TO NEW ZEALAND, AND A REVIEW OF THE EXOTIC CARABID FAUNA By R. L. C. Pilgrim DEPT, OF ZOOLOGY, UNIVERSITY OF CANTERBURY, NEW ZEALAND Abstract: Anisodactylus binotatus Fabr. 1787 (Col.: Carabidae), an introduced species now established in Canterbury (South Island), New Zealand, is reported for the first time. The literature respecting other carabids sometimes recorded as introduced is reviewed; Ago- nochila binotata (White, 1846), Agonum submetallicum (White, 1846), Hypharpax australasiae (Dejean, 1829) and Pentagonica vittipennis Chaudoir, 1877 are shown to be better considered as endemic to the Australia - New Zealand area. Other species are classed as either native to New Zealand, clearly introduced though not all established, or of doubtful occurrence in New Zealand. Introduction: The Carabidae of New Zealand are predominantly endemic species, but a small number of exotic species has been recorded. This paper reports a further introduc­ tion to the carabid fauna of this country and concludes with a survey of recorded exotic Carabidae in New Zealand. Specimens of the newly-recorded species were collected in domestic gardens in Christ­ church, and were included in a collection sent for identification to Dr. E. B. Britton, British Museum (Nat. Hist.), who kindly drew the writer's attention to the fact that they were so far unreported from New Zealand. Description of adult (from New Zealand specimens) Fig. 1. Anisodactylus binotatus Fabricius, 1787 Color: Head, pronotum, elytra and femora black; tibiae and tarsi light brown to red- black ; palps and antennal segments 1-2 brown, remainder of antennae black; leg spines red-brown; head with small red spot on frons between eyes.
    [Show full text]
  • Site Speific Health & Safety Plan Fo Nl Sinkhole / Cave
    EPA Region 5 Records Ctr. 269389 SITE-SPECIFIC HEALTH AND SAFETY PLAN NEAL'S LANDFILL SINKHOLE/CAVE ENTRY MONROE COUNTY, INDIANA Prepared for: Viacom, Inc. 11 Stanwix Street Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15222 Prepared by: PSARA Technologies, Inc. 10925 Reed Hartman Highway Suite 220 Cincinnati, Ohio 45242 Approved by: Mike Hessling PSARA Project Manager ignature TJ^T Date/ Scott W. Walton PSARA Corporate Health & nature Date Safety Director November 5, 2004 PSARA PN: 30400.57 Steigerwald, Beth From: Sent: FridNovember 05, 2004 4:1; To: Steiger Subject: FW: fifiaTversion of NLF sinkhole/cave entry HAS v^ Attachments: HASP NLF sinkhole and cave entry - FINAL.pdf HASP NLF sinkhole and cave ent... Original Message From: Andy Smith [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Friday, November 05, 2004 3:53 PM To: Jeffrey J. Lifka; John Bassett; Mike McCann; Russ Cepko; Dottie Alke Cc: Mike Hessling; Richard McCandless Subject: final version of NLF sinkhole/cave entry HASP All, Attached is the final version of the Neal's Landfill sinkhole and cave entry HASP in .pdf format. Feel free to distribute at will. John, could you please forward this to Chad Ross; I do not have his email address. Andy Smith Memorandum Neal's HASP TECHNOLOGIES, INC To: Dottie Alke, Tom Alcamo From: Scott W. Walton CC: Andy Smith, Mike Hessling Date: November 15,2004 HASP Distribution Enclosed is your copy of the Health and Safety Plan approved for use at the Neal's Landfill Cave and Sinkhole explorations. The master copy of this plan will be retained in Bloomington by Andy Smith. Thank you for your help on this.
    [Show full text]
  • NCRC Winter Meeting 2017 Minutes
    NCRC Winter Meeting 2017 Minutes Camp Skyline, Mentone, Alabama, USA, Earth. Date February 26, 2017, 9am local (CST) Call to order Call to order 08:50 am (CST) Reports: Finance Report – Gaylene Speaect: Appendix A IT report – Greg Moore: Appendix B Officer Reports National Coordinator – Anmar Mirza: Appendix C Training Officer - John Punches: Appendix D Medical Officer – Stephen Mosberg with Brian Eky Proxy: Appendix E Diving Officer – Forrest Wilson: Appendix F Regional Coordinator Reports Caribbean Region Roberto Miranda with Rick Speaect: Appendix G Central Region - Jess Deli: Appendix H Eastern Region - Tony Smith: Appendix I Northeastern Region – Greg Moore: Appendix J Pacific Northwest Region - Eddy Cartaya: Appendix K Rocky Mountain Region – Andy Armstrong: Appendix L South Central Region – DJ Walker: Appendix M Southeastern Region - Tim White:Appendix N Southwestern Region - Bob Rodgers: Appendix O Western Region - Roger Mortimer: Appendix P 2017 Seminar Update- Cartaya - Registration is ongoing with $15, 097 for the seminar so far collected. Andrew Blackstock will make rigging clamps as he did in Colorado. Permits have been submitted and are receiving them back. Decon trailer is being secured with Roger Mortimer. Transportation from Redman Airport will be available. Needs – NSS insurance, shipping some hardware, and we cannot use any software from White Nose states so will need rope and webbing and cord. April 1st if wanting instructor shirts. Manuals, Counts on Fernos and SKEDs and how many will be needed. Confirm Wifi at the venue. Level Leads: Jess Deli Level 1, Rene Ohms Level 2, Glen Hugus Level 3, DJ Walker Tofe. 2018 Seminar Proposal- Mentone Alabama May 9 -19 only date available at this location.
    [Show full text]
  • EFFECTS of LATITUDE, SEASON, ELEVATION, and MICROHABITAT on FIELD BODY TEMPERATURES of NEOTROPICAL and TEMPERATE ZONE Salamandersl
    Ecology, 63(6), 1982, pp. 1657-1664 © 1982 by the Ecological Society of America EFFECTS OF LATITUDE, SEASON, ELEVATION, AND MICROHABITAT ON FIELD BODY TEMPERATURES OF NEOTROPICAL AND TEMPERATE ZONE SALAMANDERSl MARTIN E. FEDER Department ofAnatomy and Committee on Evolutionary Biology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637 USA, and Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720 USA AND JAMES F. LYNCH Chesapeake Bay Center for Environmental Studies, Smithsonian Institution, P.O. Box 28, Edgewater, Maryland 21037 USA, and Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720 USA Abstract. We analyzed field body temperatures of neotropical salamanders (Feder et al. 1982b) to examine existing generalizations about salamander thermal ecology, which have been based almost entirely upon data for temperate zone species. Our findings can be summarized as follows: 1) Behavioral thermoregulation in the field is evidently uncommon among the vast majority of tropical and temperate salamander species. Body temperatures of tropical salamanders closely parallel seasonal and altitudinal changes in the thermal environment. 2) Body temperatures of salamanders show a complex relationship with latitude. Temperate zone species experience lower minimum temperatures than neotropical salamanders, but there are no consistent latitudinal trends in maximum body temperatures. Tropical plethodontids and ambysto­ matids show similar rates of decline in mean body temperature with increasing elevation, but am­ bystomatid temperatures are significantly warmer than plethodontid temperatures at the same ele­ vation. 3) Variation in body temperature is greater seasonally for temperate salamanders than tropical salamanders. At a given time or locality, however, variation in field body temperature among members of a population is similar for tropical and temperate salamanders.
    [Show full text]
  • New Species of Fossil Oribatid Mites (Acariformes, Oribatida), from the Lower Cretaceous Amber of Spain
    Cretaceous Research 63 (2016) 68e76 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Cretaceous Research journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/CretRes New species of fossil oribatid mites (Acariformes, Oribatida), from the Lower Cretaceous amber of Spain * Antonio Arillo a, , Luis S. Subías a, Alba Sanchez-García b a Departamento de Zoología y Antropología Física, Facultad de Biología, Universidad Complutense, E-28040 Madrid, Spain b Departament de Dinamica de la Terra i de l'Ocea and Institut de Recerca de la Biodiversitat (IRBio), Facultat de Geologia, Universitat de Barcelona, E- 08028 Barcelona, Spain article info abstract Article history: Mites are relatively common and diverse in fossiliferous ambers, but remain essentially unstudied. Here, Received 12 November 2015 we report on five new oribatid fossil species from Lower Cretaceous Spanish amber, including repre- Received in revised form sentatives of three superfamilies, and five families of the Oribatida. Hypovertex hispanicus sp. nov. and 8 February 2016 Tenuelamellarea estefaniae sp. nov. are described from amber pieces discovered in the San Just outcrop Accepted in revised form 22 February 2016 (Teruel Province). This is the first time fossil oribatid mites have been discovered in the El Soplao outcrop Available online 3 March 2016 (Cantabria Province) and, here, we describe the following new species: Afronothrus ornosae sp. nov., Nothrus vazquezae sp. nov., and Platyliodes sellnicki sp. nov. The taxa are discussed in relation to other Keywords: Lamellareidae fossil lineages of Oribatida as well as in relation to their modern counterparts. Some of the inclusions Neoliodidae were imaged using confocal laser scanning microscopy, demonstrating the potential of this technique for Nothridae studying fossil mites in amber.
    [Show full text]
  • 2017 Report on the Haleakalā High Altitude Observatory Site
    Haleakalā High Altitude Observatory Site Management Plan 2017 Annual Report Introduction to Management of the Haleakalā High Altitude Observatory Site The Haleakalā High Altitude Observatory Site (HO) Management Plan (MP) was approved by the Board of Land and Natural Resources (BLNR) on December 1, 2010. Condition #2 states: “Beginning in November 2012 the University will submit to DLNR an annual report summarizing any construction activities occurring at HO; Habitat Conservation Plans; Monitoring Plans for Invertebrates, Flora, and Fauna; Programmatic Agreements on Cultural Resources; Invasive Species Control Plans and other related plans, The Report should be brief but thorough. This report should also be presented to the Board of Land and Natural Resources for the first year, and every five years thereafter.” Therefore, this report summarizes activities that occurred under the MP from December 1, 2016 to November 30, 2017. The land use described in this report, on activities under the HO MP, qualifies as an identified use in the General Subzone and is consistent with the objectives of the General Subzone of the land. The objectives of the General Subzone (HAR 13-5-14) are to designate open space where specific conservation uses may not be defined, but where urban uses would be premature. The land use is consistent with astronomical research facilities for advanced studies of astronomy and atmospheric sciences. HO is located within a General Subzone of the State of Hawai’i Conservation District that has been set aside for observatory site purposes only. Identified applicable land uses in the General Subzone, include R-3 Astronomy Facilities and (D-1) Astronomy facilities under an approved management plan (HAR 13-5-25).
    [Show full text]
  • Across Watersheds in the Klamath Mountains
    Diversity 2013, 5, 657-679; doi:10.3390/d5030657 OPEN ACCESS diversity ISSN 1424-2818 www.mdpi.com/journal/diversity Article Genetic Diversity of Black Salamanders (Aneides flavipunctatus) across Watersheds in the Klamath Mountains Sean B. Reilly 1,*, Mitchell F. Mulks 2, Jason M. Reilly 3, W. Bryan Jennings 4, and David B. Wake 1 1 Museum of Vertebrate Zoology and Department of Integrative Biology, University of California, 3101 Valley Life Sciences Building, Berkeley, CA 94720-3160, USA; E-Mail: [email protected] 2 Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, 1156 High Street, Santa Cruz, CA 95064, USA; E-Mail: [email protected] 3 Bureau of Land Management, Medford Interagency Office, Medford, OR 97504, USA; E-Mail: [email protected] 4 Museu Nacional, Departamento de Vertebrados, Universidade Federal Do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, RJ 20940-040, Brazil; E-Mail: [email protected] * Author to whom correspondence should be addressed; E-Mail: [email protected]; Tel.: +1-510-642-3567; Fax: +1-510-643-8238. Received: 31 May 2013; in revised form: 2 August 2013 / Accepted: 8 August 2013 / Published: 29 August 2013 Abstract: Here we characterize the genetic structure of Black Salamanders (Aneides flavipunctatus) in the Klamath Mountains of northwestern California and southwestern Oregon using mitochondrial and nuclear DNA sequences. We hypothesized that the Sacramento, Smith, Klamath, and Rogue River watersheds would represent distinct genetic populations based on prior ecological results, which suggest that Black Salamanders avoid high elevations such as the ridges that separate watersheds. Our mitochondrial results revealed two major lineages, one in the Sacramento River watershed, and another containing the Klamath, Smith, and Rogue River watersheds.
    [Show full text]
  • A Genus-Level Supertree of Adephaga (Coleoptera) Rolf G
    ARTICLE IN PRESS Organisms, Diversity & Evolution 7 (2008) 255–269 www.elsevier.de/ode A genus-level supertree of Adephaga (Coleoptera) Rolf G. Beutela,Ã, Ignacio Riberab, Olaf R.P. Bininda-Emondsa aInstitut fu¨r Spezielle Zoologie und Evolutionsbiologie, FSU Jena, Germany bMuseo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales, Madrid, Spain Received 14 October 2005; accepted 17 May 2006 Abstract A supertree for Adephaga was reconstructed based on 43 independent source trees – including cladograms based on Hennigian and numerical cladistic analyses of morphological and molecular data – and on a backbone taxonomy. To overcome problems associated with both the size of the group and the comparative paucity of available information, our analysis was made at the genus level (requiring synonymizing taxa at different levels across the trees) and used Safe Taxonomic Reduction to remove especially poorly known species. The final supertree contained 401 genera, making it the most comprehensive phylogenetic estimate yet published for the group. Interrelationships among the families are well resolved. Gyrinidae constitute the basal sister group, Haliplidae appear as the sister taxon of Geadephaga+ Dytiscoidea, Noteridae are the sister group of the remaining Dytiscoidea, Amphizoidae and Aspidytidae are sister groups, and Hygrobiidae forms a clade with Dytiscidae. Resolution within the species-rich Dytiscidae is generally high, but some relations remain unclear. Trachypachidae are the sister group of Carabidae (including Rhysodidae), in contrast to a proposed sister-group relationship between Trachypachidae and Dytiscoidea. Carabidae are only monophyletic with the inclusion of a non-monophyletic Rhysodidae, but resolution within this megadiverse group is generally low. Non-monophyly of Rhysodidae is extremely unlikely from a morphological point of view, and this group remains the greatest enigma in adephagan systematics.
    [Show full text]
  • Coleoptera: Carabidae), Including the Adventive Harpalus Rubripes (Duftschmid) Among Seven New State Records
    The Great Lakes Entomologist Volume 47 Numbers 1 & 2 - Spring/Summer 2014 Numbers Article 9 1 & 2 - Spring/Summer 2014 April 2014 Additions to the Checklist of Wisconsin Ground Beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae), Including the Adventive Harpalus Rubripes (Duftschmid) Among Seven New State Records Peter W. Messer Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.valpo.edu/tgle Part of the Entomology Commons Recommended Citation Messer, Peter W. 2014. "Additions to the Checklist of Wisconsin Ground Beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae), Including the Adventive Harpalus Rubripes (Duftschmid) Among Seven New State Records," The Great Lakes Entomologist, vol 47 (1) Available at: https://scholar.valpo.edu/tgle/vol47/iss1/9 This Peer-Review Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Department of Biology at ValpoScholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in The Great Lakes Entomologist by an authorized administrator of ValpoScholar. For more information, please contact a ValpoScholar staff member at [email protected]. Messer: Additions to the Checklist of Wisconsin Ground Beetles (Coleopter 66 THE GREAT LAKES ENTOMOLOGIST Vol. 47, Nos. 1 - 2 Additions to the Checklist of Wisconsin Ground Beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae), Including the Adventive Harpalus rubripes (Duftschmid) Among Seven New State Records Peter W. Messer1 Abstract Sixteen species are added to the checklist of Wisconsin Geadephaga. Of these, seven species are reported here as new to Wisconsin. Nine taxa from the list are affected by new information resulting in the removal of six names. The Eurasian beetle Harpalus rubripes was discovered as early as 2009 on annu- ally surveyed beaches along Lake Michigan in southeastern Wisconsin.
    [Show full text]
  • Terry Whitworth 3707 96Th ST E, Tacoma, WA 98446
    Terry Whitworth 3707 96th ST E, Tacoma, WA 98446 Washington State University E-mail: [email protected] or [email protected] Published in Proceedings of the Entomological Society of Washington Vol. 108 (3), 2006, pp 689–725 Websites blowflies.net and birdblowfly.com KEYS TO THE GENERA AND SPECIES OF BLOW FLIES (DIPTERA: CALLIPHORIDAE) OF AMERICA, NORTH OF MEXICO UPDATES AND EDITS AS OF SPRING 2017 Table of Contents Abstract .......................................................................................................................... 3 Introduction .................................................................................................................... 3 Materials and Methods ................................................................................................... 5 Separating families ....................................................................................................... 10 Key to subfamilies and genera of Calliphoridae ........................................................... 13 See Table 1 for page number for each species Table 1. Species in order they are discussed and comparison of names used in the current paper with names used by Hall (1948). Whitworth (2006) Hall (1948) Page Number Calliphorinae (18 species) .......................................................................................... 16 Bellardia bayeri Onesia townsendi ................................................... 18 Bellardia vulgaris Onesia bisetosa .....................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Bosco Palazzi
    SHILAP Revista de Lepidopterología ISSN: 0300-5267 ISSN: 2340-4078 [email protected] Sociedad Hispano-Luso-Americana de Lepidopterología España Bella, S; Parenzan, P.; Russo, P. Diversity of the Macrolepidoptera from a “Bosco Palazzi” area in a woodland of Quercus trojana Webb., in southeastern Murgia (Apulia region, Italy) (Insecta: Lepidoptera) SHILAP Revista de Lepidopterología, vol. 46, no. 182, 2018, April-June, pp. 315-345 Sociedad Hispano-Luso-Americana de Lepidopterología España Available in: https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=45559600012 How to cite Complete issue Scientific Information System Redalyc More information about this article Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America and the Caribbean, Spain and Journal's webpage in redalyc.org Portugal Project academic non-profit, developed under the open access initiative SHILAP Revta. lepid., 46 (182) junio 2018: 315-345 eISSN: 2340-4078 ISSN: 0300-5267 Diversity of the Macrolepidoptera from a “Bosco Palazzi” area in a woodland of Quercus trojana Webb., in southeastern Murgia (Apulia region, Italy) (Insecta: Lepidoptera) S. Bella, P. Parenzan & P. Russo Abstract This study summarises the known records of the Macrolepidoptera species of the “Bosco Palazzi” area near the municipality of Putignano (Apulia region) in the Murgia mountains in southern Italy. The list of species is based on historical bibliographic data along with new material collected by other entomologists in the last few decades. A total of 207 species belonging to the families Cossidae (3 species), Drepanidae (4 species), Lasiocampidae (7 species), Limacodidae (1 species), Saturniidae (2 species), Sphingidae (5 species), Brahmaeidae (1 species), Geometridae (55 species), Notodontidae (5 species), Nolidae (3 species), Euteliidae (1 species), Noctuidae (96 species), and Erebidae (24 species) were identified.
    [Show full text]
  • CHECKLIST of WISCONSIN MOTHS (Superfamilies Mimallonoidea, Drepanoidea, Lasiocampoidea, Bombycoidea, Geometroidea, and Noctuoidea)
    WISCONSIN ENTOMOLOGICAL SOCIETY SPECIAL PUBLICATION No. 6 JUNE 2018 CHECKLIST OF WISCONSIN MOTHS (Superfamilies Mimallonoidea, Drepanoidea, Lasiocampoidea, Bombycoidea, Geometroidea, and Noctuoidea) Leslie A. Ferge,1 George J. Balogh2 and Kyle E. Johnson3 ABSTRACT A total of 1284 species representing the thirteen families comprising the present checklist have been documented in Wisconsin, including 293 species of Geometridae, 252 species of Erebidae and 584 species of Noctuidae. Distributions are summarized using the six major natural divisions of Wisconsin; adult flight periods and statuses within the state are also reported. Examples of Wisconsin’s diverse native habitat types in each of the natural divisions have been systematically inventoried, and species associated with specialized habitats such as peatland, prairie, barrens and dunes are listed. INTRODUCTION This list is an updated version of the Wisconsin moth checklist by Ferge & Balogh (2000). A considerable amount of new information from has been accumulated in the 18 years since that initial publication. Over sixty species have been added, bringing the total to 1284 in the thirteen families comprising this checklist. These families are estimated to comprise approximately one-half of the state’s total moth fauna. Historical records of Wisconsin moths are relatively meager. Checklists including Wisconsin moths were compiled by Hoy (1883), Rauterberg (1900), Fernekes (1906) and Muttkowski (1907). Hoy's list was restricted to Racine County, the others to Milwaukee County. Records from these publications are of historical interest, but unfortunately few verifiable voucher specimens exist. Unverifiable identifications and minimal label data associated with older museum specimens limit the usefulness of this information. Covell (1970) compiled records of 222 Geometridae species, based on his examination of specimens representing at least 30 counties.
    [Show full text]