DOCSLIB.ORG

Cultural Resources Overview for the Proposed

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

CULTURAL RESOURCES OVERVIEW FOR THE PROPOSED BOUNDLESS ENERGY New York Branch PROJECT, NEW YORK SEGMENT, 2390 Clinton Street Buffalo, NY 14227 Tel: (716) 821-1650 RENSSELAER, ALBANY, COLUMBIA, GREENE, Fax: (716) 821-1607 Alabama Branch 2301 Paul Bryant Drive ULSTER, ORANGE, AND DUTCHESS COUNTIES, Tuscaloosa, AL 35401 Tel: (205) 556-3096 Fax: (205) 556-1144 NEW YORK Tennessee Branch 91 Tillman Street Memphis, TN 38111 Tel: (901) 454-4733 Fax: (901) 454-4736 Prepared for: Corporate Headquarters ECOLOGY & ENVIRONMENT P.O. Box 20884 Tuscaloosa, AL 35402 368 Pleasant View Drive Tel: (205) 248-8767 Lancaster, New York 14068 Fax: (205) 248-8739 Prepared by: PANAMERICAN CONSULTANTS, INC. Buffalo Branch Office 2390 Clinton Street Buffalo, New York 14227-1735 (716) 821-1650 September 2013 CULTURAL RESOURCES OVERVIEW FOR THE PROPOSED BOUNDLESS ENERGY PROJECT NEW YORK SEGMENT, RENSSELAER, ALBANY, COLUMBIA, GREENE, ULSTER, ORANGE, AND DUTCHESS COUNTIES, NEW YORK Prepared for: ECOLOGY & ENVIRONMENT 368 Pleasant View Drive Lancaster, New York 14068 Prepared by: Michael A. Cinquino, Ph.D., RPA, Principal Investigator/Project Director Mark A. Steinback, M.A., Senior Historian Donald A. Smith, Ph.D., RPA, Senior Archaeologist/GIS Specialist Frank J. Schieppati, Ph.D., RPA Preservation Planner/Sr. Archaeologist Christine Longiaru, M.A., Senior Architectural Historian PANAMERICAN CONSULTANTS, INC. Buffalo Branch Office 2390 Clinton Street Buffalo, NY 14227 (716) 821-1650 September 2013 Table of Contents List of Figures and Tables .......................................................................................................... iii 1.0 Introduction .....................................................................................................................1-1 1.1 Project Description .................................................................................................1-1 2.0 Background Research .....................................................................................................2-1 2.1 Cultural Background ...............................................................................................2-1 2.1.1 Prehistoric Summary ...................................................................................2-1 2.1.2 Historic Summary ......................................................................................2 -12 2.2 Documentary Research ........................................................................................2 -32 2.2.1 Site File Data ............................................................................................ 2-32 3.0 Proposed Construction and Cultural Resources Sensitivity Assessment by Section ........3-1 3.1 Cultural Resources Investigation Level of Effort .....................................................3-1 3.2 Construction and Cultural Resources Sensitivity Assessment by Section ...............3-1 3.2.1 Section 1: Reynolds Tap to New Scotland, MP 0 to MP 8.65 ......................3-1 3.2.2 Section 2: Knickerbocker to Leeds, MP 8.66 to MP 32 ................................3-2 3.2.3 Section 3: Leeds to Rock Tavern, MP 32 to MP 101.17 ..............................3-5 3.2.4 Section 4: Roseton to East Fishkill, MP 101.17 to MP 109.57 .....................3-7 4.0 Conclusions and Recommendations ...............................................................................4-1 4.1 Cultural Resource Sensitivity ..................................................................................4-1 4.2 Assessing Proposed Project Activities ....................................................................4-1 4.3 Native American Consultation ...............................................................................4-1 4.4 Summary of Recommendations .............................................................................4-2 4.4.1 Section 1: Reynolds Tap to New Scotland, MP 0 to MP 8.65 ......................4-2 4.4.2 Section 2: Knickerbocker to Leeds, MP 8.66 to MP 32 ................................4-2 4.4.3 Section 3: Leeds to Rock Tavern, MP 32 to MP 101.17 ..............................4-4 4.4.4 Section 4: Roseton to East Fishkill, MP 101.17 to MP 109.57 .....................4-4 5.0 References .....................................................................................................................5-1 Panamerican Consultants, Inc. ii Boundless Energy List of Figures and Tables FIGURE PAGE 1.1 Approximate location of the Leeds Project West (LPW) project area in the Hudson Valley of New York State .................................................................................................1-3 1.2 Approximate location of the LPW project area between MP 0 and MP 44 in the Hudson Valley of New York State ....................................................................................1-4 1.3 Approximate location of the LPW project area between MP 44 and MP 81 in the Hudson Valley of New York State ....................................................................................1-5 1.4 Approximate location of the LPW project area between MP 74 and MP 109.57 in the Hudson Valley of New York State ..............................................................................1-6 2.1 Manor of Rensselaerswyck in 1767. The red square is the approximate location of what is now the City of Albany .......................................................................................2 -18 2.2 Sections of the project area with previously-recorded archaeological sites .................... 2-35 2.3 Approximate location of NRL resources in relation to the propose LPW project area .... 2-36 TABLE PAGE 2.1 Archaeological sites within or adjacent to the project area ............................................2 -32 2.2 National Register-Listed sites within or adjacent to the project area .............................. 2-34 Panamerican Consultants, Inc. iii Boundless Energy 1.0 Introduction Panamerican Consultants, Inc. (Panamerican) was contracted by Ecology and Environment, Inc., to conduct a Desktop Cultural Resources Study for the New York segment of the Boundless Energy (Boundless) Leeds Project West (LPW) Transmission Project (Project) in Rensselaer, Albany, Columbia, Greene, Ulster, Orange, and Dutchess counties (Figure 1.1). Boundless proposes to construct new 345-kilovolt (kV) transmission lines and to reconductor1 existing 345- kV lines in Rensselaer, Albany, Columbia, Greene, Ulster, Orange, and Dutchess counties, New York. Figure 1.1 shows the LPW project location within New York’s Hudson Valley. The Project will use new 345-kV lines in existing transmission corridors to connect clean and efficient sources of energy in upstate New York with southeastern New York. New transmission conductors will be installed primarily on new steel monopoles approximately 130 feet (ft) high in Sections 1, 2, and 4. H-frame structures will only be removed in Section 1. Reconductoring will be done on H-frame structures in Section 3. There will also be segments of underground construction in Sections 2 and 4, as well as horizontal directional drilling (HDD) under the Hudson River. The Project also includes construction of switching stations and a new substation, as well as expansion of the existing corridor. Section 1 (Reynolds Tap to New Scotland, Mile Post [MP] 0 to MP 8.65) of the proposed LPW project will tap into the existing 345-kV line in the Town of East Greenbush in Rensselaer County (Figure 1.2). From there, new line will extend west approximately 8.65 miles within an existing right- of-way (ROW) as an overhead line across the Hudson River to connect with the New Scotland substation in Albany County. New monopole towers will be built to replace existing H-frame poles within an existing ROW, but additional area may need to be added to the ROW in places. Section 2 (Knickerbocker to Leeds, MP 8.66 to MP 32) of the proposed Project will connect with the 345-kV lines of the existing interconnection with the New England region between New Scotland and Alps (see Figure 1.2). A new substation (Knickerbocker) will be constructed near the intersection of Knickerbocker and Muitzeskill roads in the Town of Schodack, Rensselaer County. Approximately three acres of land will be required for construction of the new substation. A new 345-kV line will extend approximately 23.3 miles south from the new substation to the Hudson substation near the City of Hudson, Columbia County. Approximately 18.6 miles will consist of new overhead lines within existing transmission-line corridors. A transition station will be constructed near the Hudson substation at which point the line will be constructed underground for approximately 2.75 miles, passing through the city as a buried cable. From MP 30, the Project will continue underground, crossing under the Hudson River by HDD. The line would continue approximately one mile underground in Greene County to connect to the Leeds substation. Section 3 (Leeds to Rock Tavern, MP 32 to MP 101.17) of the proposed Project comprises a new 345-kV circuit, which would be added to an existing line starting at the Leeds substation (Figures 1.3 and 1.4; see Figure 1.2). The existing line would be reconductored with minimal or no modifications to existing tower structures. This section will extend approximately 55 miles south through Ulster County and connect to a new switchyard near East Road in the Town of Marlborough, just north of the Orange County line in Ulster County. Approximately three acres of land will be required for construction
Recommended publications
  • Low Bridge, Everybody Down' (WITH INDEX)

    Low Bridge, Everybody Down' (WITH INDEX)

    “Low Bridge; Everybody Down!” Notes & Notions on the Construction & Early Operation of the Erie Canal Chuck Friday Editor and Commentator 2005 “Low Bridge; Everybody Down!” 1 Table of Contents TOPIC PAGE Introduction ………………………………………………………………….. 3 The Erie Canal as a Federal Project………………………………………….. 3 New York State Seizes the Initiative………………………………………… 4 Biographical Sketch of Jesse Hawley - Early Erie Canal Advocate…………. 5 Western Terminus for the Erie Canal (Black Rock vs Buffalo)……………… 6 Digging the Ditch……………………………………………………………. 7 Yankee Ingenuity…………………………………………………………….. 10 Eastward to Albany…………………………………………………………… 12 Westward to Lake Erie………………………………………………………… 16 Tying Up Loose Ends………………………………………………………… 20 The Building of a Harbor at Buffalo………………………………………….. 21 Canal Workforce……………………………………………………………… 22 The Irish Worker Story……………………………………………………….. 27 Engineering Characteristics of Canals………………………………………… 29 Early Life on the Canal……………………………………………………….. 33 Winter – The Canal‘sGreatest Impediment……………………………………. 43 Canal Expansion………………………………………………………………. 45 “Low Bridge; Everybody Down!” 2 ―Low Bridge; Everybody Down!‖ Notes & Notions on the Construction & Early Operation of the Erie Canal Initial Resource Book: Dan Murphy, The Erie Canal: The Ditch That Opened A Nation, 2001 Introduction A foolhardy proposal, years of political bickering and partisan infighting, an outrageous $7.5 million price tag (an amount roughly equal to about $4 billion today) – all that for a four foot deep, 40 foot wide ditch connecting Lake Erie in western New York with the Hudson River in Albany. It took 7 years of labor, slowly clawing shovels of earth from the ground in a 363-mile trek across the wilderness of New York State. Through the use of many references, this paper attempts to describe this remarkable construction project. Additionally, it describes the early operation of the canal and its impact on the daily life on or near the canal‘s winding path across the state.
  • "Smackdown on the Hudson" the Patroon, the West India Company, and the Founding of Albany

    "Smackdown on the Hudson" the Patroon, the West India Company, and the Founding of Albany

    "Smackdown on the Hudson" The Patroon, the West India Company, and the Founding of Albany Lesson Procedures Essential question: How was the colony of New Netherland ruled by the Dutch West India Company and the patroons? Grade 7 Content Understandings, New York State Standards: Social Studies Standards This lesson covers European Exploration and Colonization of the Americas and Life in Colonial Communities, focusing on settlement patterns and political life in New Netherland. By studying the conflict between the Petrus Stuyvesant and the Brant van Slichtenhorst, students will consider the sources of historic documents and evaluate their reliability. Common Core Standards: Reading Standards By analyzing historic documents, students will develop essential reading, writing, and critical thinking skills. They will read and analyze informational texts and draw inferences from those texts. Students will explain what happened and why based on information from the readings. Additionally, as a class, students will discuss general academic and domain- specific words or phrases relevant to the unit. Speaking and Listening Standards Students will engage in group and teacher-led collaborative discussions, using textual evidence to pose hypotheses and respond to specific questions. They will also report to the class on their group’s assigned topic, explaining their ideas, analyses, and observations and citing reasons and evidence to support their claims. New Netherland Institute New Netherland Research Center "Smackdown on the Hudson" 2 Writing Standards To conclude this lesson, students write a letter to the editor of the Rensselaerwijck Times that draws evidence from informational texts and supports claims with clear reasons and relevant evidence. Historical Context: In 1614, soon after the founding of the New Netherland Company (predecessor to the West India Company, est.
  • A-Brief-History-Of-The-Mohican-Nation

    A-Brief-History-Of-The-Mohican-Nation

    wig d r r ksc i i caln sr v a ar ; ny s' k , a u A Evict t:k A Mitfsorgo 4 oiwcan V 5to cLk rid;Mc-u n,5 3 ss l Y gew y » w a. 3 k lz x OWE u, 9g z ca , Z 1 9 A J i NEI x i c x Rat 44MMA Y t6 manY 1 YryS y Y s 4 INK S W6 a r sue`+ r1i 3 My personal thanks gc'lo thc, f'al ca ° iaag, t(")mcilal a r of the Stockbridge-IMtarasee historical C;orrunittee for their comments and suggestions to iatataraare tlac=laistcatic: aal aac c aracy of this brief' history of our people ta°a Raa la€' t "din as for her c<arefaal editing of this text to Jeff vcic.'of, the rlohican ?'yews, otar nation s newspaper 0 to Chad Miller c d tlac" Land Resource aM anaagenient Office for preparing the map Dorothy Davids, Chair Stockbridge -Munsee Historical Committee Tke Muk-con-oLke-ne- rfie People of the Waters that Are Never Still have a rich and illustrious history which has been retrained through oral tradition and the written word, Our many moves frorn the East to Wisconsin left Many Trails to retrace in search of our history. Maanv'rrails is air original design created and designed by Edwin Martin, a Mohican Indian, symbol- izing endurance, strength and hope. From a long suffering proud and deternuned people. e' aw rtaftv f h s is an aatathCutic basket painting by Stockbridge Mohican/ basket weavers.
  • Plant Rarity Under Federal and State Laws and Regulations

    Plant Rarity Under Federal and State Laws and Regulations

    Plant Rarity Under Federal and State Laws and Regulations Various government laws, regulations and policies protect rare plants. Probably the most surprising aspect of rare plant protection is that, unlike animals, plants are the property of the landowner whether that might be an individual, corporation, or government agency. This means that the protection of rare plants is under control of the landowner unless, in some cases, a government-regulated action is affecting them. Then the government entity regulating the action may require that protection efforts take place to preserve the rare plants and their habitat. Federal Law One of the results of the environmental movement of the 1960s and 70s was the enactment of the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (https://www.fws.gov/endangered/laws-policies/index.html). The Act was designed to prevent the extinction of plants and animals, addressing problems of both exploitation and habitat destruction. The Act defines an endangered species as any species of animal or plant that is in danger of extinction over all or a significant portion of its range. A threatened species is defined as one that is likely to become endangered. The Act regulates the "taking" of endangered and threatened plants on federal land or when they are affected by federal actions or the use of federal funds. Specific protection is outlined in the Endangered Species Act of 1973 and states: It is unlawful for any person subject to the jurisdiction of the United States to: import any such species into, or export any such species
  • Erie Canalway Map & Guide

    Erie Canalway Map & Guide

    National Park Service Erie Canalway National Heritage Corridor U.S. Department of the Interior Erie Canalway Map & Guide Pittsford, Frank Forte Pittsford, The New York State Canal System—which includes the Erie, Champlain, Cayuga-Seneca, and Oswego Canals—is the centerpiece of the Erie Canalway National Heritage Corridor. Experience the enduring legacy of this National Historic Landmark by boat, bike, car, or on foot. Discover New York’s Dubbed the “Mother of Cities” the canal fueled the growth of industries, opened the nation to settlement, and made New York the Empire State. (Clinton Square, Syracuse, 1905, courtesy Library of Congress, Prints & Photographs Division, Detroit Publishing Extraordinary Canals Company Collection.) pened in 1825, New York’s canals are a waterway link from the Atlantic Ocean to the Great Lakes through the heart of upstate New York. Through wars and peacetime, prosperity and This guide presents exciting Orecession, flood and drought, this exceptional waterway has provided a living connection things to do, places to go, to a proud past and a vibrant future. Built with leadership, ingenuity, determination, and hard work, and exceptional activities to the canals continue to remind us of the qualities that make our state and nation great. They offer us enjoy. Welcome! inspiration to weather storms and time-tested knowledge that we will prevail. Come to New York’s canals this year. Touch the building stones CONTENTS laid by immigrants and farmers 200 years ago. See century-old locks, lift Canals and COVID-19 bridges, and movable dams constructed during the canal’s 20th century Enjoy Boats and Boating Please refer to current guidelines and enlargement and still in use today.
  • Glacial Lake Albany Butterfly Milkweed Plant Release Notice

    Glacial Lake Albany Butterfly Milkweed Plant Release Notice

    UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE BIG FLATS, NEW YORK AND ALBANY PINE BUSH PRESERVE COMMISSION ALBANY, NEW YORK AND THE NATURE CONSERVANCY EASTERN NEW YORK CHAPTER TROY, NEW YORK AND NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION ALBANY, NEW YORK NOTICE OF RELEASE OF GLACIAL LAKE ALBANY GERMPLASM BUTTERFLY MILKWEED The Albany Pine Bush Preserve Commission, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, The Nature Conservancy, and the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, announce the release of a source-identified ecotype of Butterfly milkweed (Asclepias tuberosa L.). As a source identified release, this plant will be referred to as Glacial Lake Albany Germplasm butterfly milkweed, to document its original location. It has been assigned the NRCS accession number, 9051776. This alternative release procedure is justified because there is an immediate need for a source of local ecotype of butterfly milkweed. Plant material of this specific ecotype is needed for ecosystem and endangered species habitat restoration in the Pine Barrens of Glacial Lake Albany. The inland pitch pine - scrub oak barrens of Glacial Lake Albany are a globally rare ecosystem and provide habitat for 20 rare species, including the federally endangered Karner blue butterfly (Lycaeides melissa samuelis). The potential for immediate use is high and the commercial potential beyond Glacial Lake Albany is probably high. Collection Site Information: Stands are located within Glacial Lake Albany, from Albany, New York to Glens Falls, New York, and generally within the Albany Pine Bush Preserve, just west of Albany, New York. The elevation within the Pine Barrens is approximately 300 feet, containing a savanna-like ecosystem with sandy soils wind- swept into dunes, following the last glacial period.
  • Topography Section References

    Topography Section References

    Section 8 References 8. REFERENCES 1. Purpose and Need for the proposed Action Bureau of Indian Affairs (2006). Website. Retrieved May 24, 2006 from http://www.doi.gov/bureau-indian-affairs.html. 3.2.1 Topography Fenneman, N.M., & Johnson, D.W. (1946). Physical Divisions of the United States: Washington, DC. US Geological Survey Special Map Series. NASA Visible Earth Image catalog (1991, October 18). SRTM, Landsat. Retreived February 13, 2000, from http://visibleearth.nasa.gov USGS (2006). Seamless Data Distribution System. Earth Resources Observation and Science (EROS). United States Geological Survey. Retrieved March 22, 2006, from http://seamless.usgs.gov 3.2.2 Soils USDA– SCS (1987). Hydric Soils of the United States. United States Department of Agriculture– Soil Conservation Service. USDA. Natural Resource Conservation Service Soil Data Mart. United States Department of Agriculture. Retrieved from http://soildatamart.nrcs.usda.gov/. United States Department of Agriculture. Natural Resources Conservation Service. (1993, October). Soil Survey Manual. Retrieved April 8, 2006 from http://soils.usda.gov/technical/manual/print_version/chapter6.html U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, (2005). National Soil Survey Handbook, title 430-VI. Retrieved from http://soils.usda.gov/technical/handbook/ 3.2.3 Geological Setting and Mineral Resources Cadwell, D.H., Connally, G.G., Dineen, R.J., Fleisher, P.J., & Rich, J.L. (1987) Surficial Geologic Map of New York – Hudson-Mohawk Sheet. New York State Museum Geological Survey. Bureau of Indian Affairs Draft EIS 8-1 Oneida Nation of New York Conveyance of Lands Into Trust Section 8 References Fisher, D.W., Isachsen, Y.W., & Rickard, L.V.
  • The Capital Region Sustainability Plan

    The Capital Region Sustainability Plan

    CAPITAL |Region| Sustainability Plan Acknowledgements We would like to thank the following people for their work on the Capital Region Sustainability Plan Executive Committee Technical Committees John Porreca, Town of Greenport Bob Radliff, Community Loan Fund of the Capital Sarah Crowell Climate Adaptation Region, Committee Chair Land Use and Livable Communities Chair Erik Deyoe, Town of Bethlehem, Committee Tori Riley, Washington County LDC Thomas Crowell Chair Food Systems Committee Chair Frank Thomas, Town of Stoney Creek Todd Fabozzi, CDRPC Erik Deyoe Michael Tucker, CEG Climate Adaptation Committee Chair Meghan Haley-Quigley, Union College Susan Wilson, Town of Bolton Jeff Edwards Nancy Heinzen, Stormwater Coalition of Albany Schenectady County County Thomas Wood, Saratoga Board of Supervisors Jim Kalohn, Schenectady County Kenneth Flood Energy Columbia County Kate Mance, Adirondack, Glens Falls Transportation Council Jodi Smits Anderson, DASNY Mark Gleason Waste Committee Chair Mike Manning, City of Watervliet Robert Blais, Village of Lake George Brad Fischer, Albany County Pradeep Haldar Doug Melnick, City of Albany Energy Committee Co-Chair Sandra Nierzwicki-Bauer, Darrin Fresh Water Pradeep Haldar, UAlbany, Co-Chair Institute Jason Kemper Deborah Howard, State University of New York Saratoga County Sasha Spector, Scenic Hudson Stacey Hughes, National Grid Wayne LaMothe Karen Strong, NYS DEC Hudson River Estuary Warren County Karen Kellogg, Skidmore College David VanLuven Indumanthi Lnu Indumanthi Lnu, UAlbany, Co-Chair Energy
  • A Retrospective on Archaeology at Fort William Henry, 1952-1993: Retelling the Tale of the Last of the Mohicans David R

    A Retrospective on Archaeology at Fort William Henry, 1952-1993: Retelling the Tale of the Last of the Mohicans David R

    Northeast Historical Archaeology Volume 20 Article 2 1991 A Retrospective on Archaeology at Fort William Henry, 1952-1993: Retelling the Tale of The Last of the Mohicans David R. Starbuck Follow this and additional works at: http://orb.binghamton.edu/neha Part of the Archaeological Anthropology Commons Recommended Citation Starbuck, David R. (1991) "A Retrospective on Archaeology at Fort William Henry, 1952-1993: Retelling the Tale of The Last of the Mohicans," Northeast Historical Archaeology: Vol. 20 20, Article 2. https://doi.org/10.22191/neha/vol20/iss1/2 Available at: http://orb.binghamton.edu/neha/vol20/iss1/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by The Open Repository @ Binghamton (The ORB). It has been accepted for inclusion in Northeast Historical Archaeology by an authorized editor of The Open Repository @ Binghamton (The ORB). For more information, please contact [email protected]. A Retrospective on Archaeology at Fort William Henry, 1952-1993: Retelling the Tale of The Last of the Mohicans Cover Page Footnote I want to thank Paul Huey for impressing upon me the importance of studying older, unpublished, artifact collections. While it may appear more exciting to tackle "new" sites, we have a strong ethical obligation to make sure that older excavations are published, even when the original research was directed by others. I also wish to thank Mike Palumbo, Curator at Fort William Henry, for many stimulating conversations and for giving me access to photographs and artifacts from the 1950s excavation; and thanks go to the Fort William Henry Corporation for allowing me to reproduce archival photographs.
  • Contribution of Lake-Effect Snow to the Catskill Mountains Snowpack

    Contribution of Lake-Effect Snow to the Catskill Mountains Snowpack

    74th EASTERN SNOW CONFERENCE Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA 2017 Contribution of Lake-Effect Snow to the Catskill Mountains Snowpack DOROTHY K. HALL,1,2 NICOLO E. DIGIROLAMO,3 ALLAN FREI4 ABSTRACT Meltwater from snow that falls in the Catskill Mountains in southern New York contributes to reservoirs that supply drinking water to approximately nine million people in New York City. Using the NOAA National Ice Center’s Interactive Multisensor Snow and Ice Mapping System (IMS) 4km snow maps, we have identified at least 32 lake-effect (LE) storms emanating from Lake Erie and/or Lake Ontario that deposited snow in the Catskill/Delaware Watershed in the Catskill Mountains of southern New York State between 2004 and 2017. This represents a large underestimate of the contribution of LE snow to the Catskills snowpack because many of the LE snowstorms are not visible in the IMS snow maps when they travel over snow-covered terrain. Most of the LE snowstorms that we identified originate from Lake Ontario but quite a few originate from both Erie and Ontario, and a few from Lake Erie alone. Using satellite, meteorological and reanalysis data we identify conditions that contributed to LE snowfall in the Catskills. Clear skies following some of the storms permitted measurement of the extent of snow cover in the watershed using multiple satellite sensors. IMS maps tend to overestimate the extent of snow compared to MODerate resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) and Landsat- derived snow-cover extent maps. Using this combination of satellite and meteorological data, we can begin to quantify the important contribution of LE snow to the Catskills Mountain snowpack.
  • Mohawk River Canoe Trip August 5, 2015

    Mohawk River Canoe Trip August 5, 2015

    Mohawk River Canoe Trip August 5, 2015 A short field guide by Kurt Hollocher The trip This is a short, 2-hour trip on the Mohawk River near Rexford Bridge. We will leave from the boat docks, just upstream (west) of the south end of the bridge. We will probably travel in a clockwise path, first paddling west toward Scotia, then across to the mouth of the Alplaus Kill. Then we’ll head east to see an abandoned lock for a branch of the Erie Canal, go under the Rexford Bridge and by remnants of the Erie Canal viaduct, to the Rexford cliffs. Then we cross again to the south bank, and paddle west back to the docks. Except during the two river crossings it is important to stay out of the navigation channel, marked with red and green buoys, and to watch out for boats. Depending on the winds, we may do the trip backwards. The river The Mohawk River drains an extensive area in east and central New York. Throughout most of its reach, it flows in a single, well-defined channel between uplands on either side. Here in the Rexford area, the same is true now, but it was not always so. Toward the end of the last Ice Age, about 25,000 years ago, ice covered most of New York State. As the ice retreated, a large valley glacier remained in the Hudson River Valley, connected to the main ice sheet a bit farther to the north, when most of western and central New York was clear of ice.
  • Upper Hudson Basin

    Upper Hudson Basin

    UPPER HUDSON BASIN Description of the Basin The Upper Hudson Basin is the largest in New York State (NYS) in terms of size, covering all or part of 20 counties and about 7.5 million acres (11,700 square miles) from central Essex County in the northeastern part of the State, southwest to central Oneida County in north central NYS, southeast down the Hudson River corridor to the State’s eastern border, and finally terminating in Orange and Putnam Counties. The Basin includes four major hydrologic units: the Upper Hudson, the Mohawk Valley, the Lower Hudson, and the Housatonic. There are about 23,000 miles of mapped rivers and streams in this Basin (USGS Watershed Index). Major water bodies include Ashokan Reservoir, Esopus Creek, Rondout Creek, and Wallkill River (Ulster and Orange Counties) in the southern part of the Basin, Schoharie Creek (Montgomery, Greene, and Schoharie Counties) and the Mohawk River (from Oneida County to the Hudson River) in the central part of the Basin, and Great Sacandaga Lake (Fulton and Saratoga Counties), Saratoga Lake (Saratoga County), and Schroon Lake (Warren and Essex Counties) in the northern part of the Basin. This region also contains many smaller lakes, ponds, creeks, and streams encompassing thousands of acres of lentic and lotic habitat. And, of course, the landscape is dominated by one of the most culturally, economically, and ecologically important water bodies in the State of New York - the Hudson River. For hundreds of years the Hudson River has helped bolster New York State’s economy by sustaining a robust commercial fishery, by providing high value residential and commercial development, and by acting as a critical transportation link between upstate New York/New England and the ports of New York City.