Narratives from Appalachia: the Current Stories of LGBTQ Community College Students

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Narratives from Appalachia: the Current Stories of LGBTQ Community College Students Old Dominion University ODU Digital Commons Educational Foundations & Leadership Theses & Dissertations Educational Foundations & Leadership Spring 2021 Narratives from Appalachia: The Current Stories of LGBTQ Community College Students Todd A. Cimino-Johnson Old Dominion University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.odu.edu/efl_etds Part of the Community College Leadership Commons, Educational Sociology Commons, Higher Education Commons, and the Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender Studies Commons Recommended Citation Cimino-Johnson, Todd A.. "Narratives from Appalachia: The Current Stories of LGBTQ Community College Students" (2021). Doctor of Philosophy (PhD), Dissertation, Educational Foundations & Leadership, Old Dominion University, DOI: 10.25777/39n0-0s43 https://digitalcommons.odu.edu/efl_etds/257 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Educational Foundations & Leadership at ODU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Educational Foundations & Leadership Theses & Dissertations by an authorized administrator of ODU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. NARRATIVES FROM APPALACHIA: THE CURRENT STORIES OF LGBTQ COMMUNITY COLLEGE STUDENTS by Todd A. Cimino-Johnson B.S. May 2005, Shepherd University M.B.A. December 2006, Shepherd University M.A. August 2017, American Public University A Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of Old Dominion University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY COMMUNITY COLLEGE LEADERSHIP OLD DOMINION UNIVERSITY May 2021 Approved by: Mitchell R. Williams (Director) Robert J. Lynch (Member) Laura E. Smithers (Member) ABSTRACT NARRATIVES FROM APPALACHIA: THE CURRENT STORIES OF LGBTQ COMMUNITY COLLEGE STUDENTS Todd A. Cimino-Johnson Old Dominion University, 2021 Director: Dr. Mitchell R. Williams LGBTQ students are ubiquitous on community college campuses across the United States. The exact number of LGBTQ students is unknown and often their needs are ignored. LGBTQ students face harassment and discrimination at higher rates than other minority groups. This study was conducted to gather the current narratives of LGBTQ students attending community colleges in the Appalachian Region. This study aimed to determine what LGBTQ students are experiencing on community college campuses across Appalachia. Fifteen students took part in a one-on-one semi-structured interview for this qualitative study. All students were currently enrolled in a program of study when the interviews took place. The research paradigm utilized was social constructivism, and Queer Theory was the basis of the conceptual framework. This study used narrative coding with the Labovian Model of Analysis. Composite narratives were written, and pseudonyms used to create anonymity for the participants. The findings of this study indicated students encounter microaggressions in the classroom and in other places around a community college. Nevertheless, the campus is often perceived to be a cultural bubble by students and is perceived as safer than the nearest town or city. Participants stated that the religious views of other students often impact the lives of LGBTQ students. Additionally, participants mentioned politics and how it affected their lives as community college students. There were several implications for action which resulted from the findings of this study. Recommendations include creating campus policies toward inclusivity, offering on-campus Safe Zone training for all faculty and staff, offering students an LGBTQ club or organization to provide students with a safe space and a sense of belonging at the college, providing more LGBTQ resources for faculty and staff, and asking faculty to include LGBTQ individuals in course readings and other materials. Keywords: LGBTQ, community college, Appalachia, Queer Theory, Safe Zone iii Copyright, 2021, by Todd A. Cimino-Johnson, All Rights Reserved. iv This dissertation is dedicated to those who never had a chance to live their full lives as an out LGBTQ+ person. Some of their names are Matthew Shepard, Tyler Clemnti, Angie Zapata, Jamey Rodemeyer, and Steen Fenrich. Also, the victims of the 2016 Pulse Nightclub massacre and hundreds of transgender victims that are killed every year. You are never forgotten. v ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS It takes a village to accomplish anything in this world. Whether we know it or not, we cannot accomplish significant feats without the help and guidance of those around us, including family, friends, and even strangers. My biggest supporter is my husband, Tony. He has been there for me through this whole process. There have been many days and nights he had without me, but he supported and cheered me on. I owe him more than I could ever repay for the support he has shown me during these past couple of years. Dr. Williams has been one of the best advisors I could have found. He was always there to answer a question, even when I told him it could wait. He guided this process in such a way that it seemed very easy, almost too easy. When I first met him during the first summer institute, I instantly knew I wanted him as my advisor/chair. Thanks to my committee members, Dr. Williams, Dr. Smithers, and Dr. Lynch, who gave me great feedback and made this dissertation stronger. Your words of encouragement and advice helped bring this all together. Dr. Glass, Dr. Gregory, Dr. Rhodes, Dr. Burnett, Dr. Lynch, Dr. Ayers, Dr. Bol, Dr. Pribesh, Dr. Yen, and Dr. Commodore, thank you for all you have taught me during the time in the community college leadership program. I am glad that I chose ODU, and you made this program so much better. Go Monarchs! Cohort 16 is like no other group of people I have met before. Chiquita, Samantha, Page, Dana, Brandon, Rick, Chuck, Laura, Robin, and Tillie were all instrumental in getting me to the finish line. We relied on one another through this process, and whenever we reached out, someone was always there to help. I hope other Ph.D. programs have such a caring cohort as I found in all of you. Thank you for being there, and I look forward to our future friendships. vi Thank you to each of the interviewees who took time away from their day to interview with me. It can be challenging to share stories about being LGBTQ. Each person was brave enough to answer my survey and give me honest answers. My family and friends have not seen much of me since I started this journey. Thank each of you for sticking by me and know that it means a lot to me for your support and words of encouragement during this time. vii TABLE OF CONTENTS Page LIST OF FIGURES ...................................................................................................................... xii Chapter I. INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................... 1 Background of the Study ..................................................................................................... 2 Conceptual Framework ....................................................................................................... 4 Purpose Statement ............................................................................................................... 5 Research Question ............................................................................................................... 5 Significance of the Study .................................................................................................... 6 Campus Climate .................................................................................................................. 7 Appalachian Community Colleges ...................................................................................... 8 Overview of Methodology .................................................................................................. 8 Researcher Positionality .................................................................................................... 10 Delimitations ..................................................................................................................... 11 Definition of Key Terms ................................................................................................... 11 Chapter Summary .............................................................................................................. 17 II. LITERATURE REVIEW ......................................................................................................... 19 Method of the Literature Review ...................................................................................... 20 Statistics on LGBTQ Individuals ...................................................................................... 21 Gaps in the Literature on LGBTQ Community College Students .................................... 24 Historical Perspective ........................................................................................................ 26 First Studies of LGBTQ College Students ........................................................................ 26 First Studies of LGBTQ Community College Students .................................................... 27 Queer Theory ..................................................................................................................... 28 Definition of Queer Theory ..............................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • The Politics of Homophobia in Brazil: Congress and Social (Counter)Mobilization
    The Politics of Homophobia in Brazil: Congress and Social (counter)Mobilization by Robert Tyler Valiquette A Thesis presented to The University of Guelph In partial fulfilment of requirements for the degree of Master of Arts In Political Science Guelph, Ontario, Canada © Robert Tyler Valiquette, June, 2017 ABSTRACT THE POLITICS OF HOMOPHOBIA IN BRAZIL: CONGRESS AND SOCAIL (COUNTER)MOBILIZATION Tyler Valiquette Advisor: University of Guelph, 2017 Professor J Díez In recent years, Latin America has seen significant progress in the expansion of LGBT rights such as the implementation of same-sex marriage and the creation of some of the world’s most advanced gender identity laws. Brazil was at the front of this progression and by the early 2000’s, scholars believed Brazil was poised to emerge as Latin America’s gay rights champion. Despite some advancements, the image of Brazil as a gay rights champion is nebulous. The Brazilian Congress has failed in passing federal legislation protecting sexual minorities from violence and discrimination and this thesis seeks to answer why. Qualitative interviews were conducted with LGBT activists, political aides, politicians and Evangelical Pastors. Ultimately this thesis argues that Brazil does not have LGBT anti- discrimination policy because of two factors: 1) a weakening LGBT social movement and 2) a strong countermovement to LGBT rights. iii Acknowledgements Thanks is offered to numerous people upon the completion of this thesis. First, my deepest gratitude to my supervisor, Dr. Jordi Díez. I first contacted Dr. Díez in 2015 with a simple idea for research. From that moment on, Dr. Díez offered limitless support.
    [Show full text]
  • LGBTQ+Ed Newsletter 021620
    LGBTQ+ED C F H ' S L G B T Q + P R O G R A M W E E K L Y N E W S L E T T E R W E E K O F F E B R U A R Y 1 6 - 2 2 , 2 0 2 0 word of the week statistic of the week Heterosexism - noun : behavior that grants LGBTQ+ youth are twice as likely preferential treatment to heterosexual as their peers to say they have people, reinforces the idea heterosexuality been physically assaulted, is better/more “right” than queerness, kicked, or shoved at and/or makes other sexualities invisible Source: It's Pronounced Metrosexual, 2020 Source: Human Rights Campaign, 2020 clickable educational article Cancer Survivorship in the LGBT Community Source: LGBT HealthLink, 2020 this week in LGBTQ+ history February 20, 2004: Constitutional monarch of Cambodia, King Norodom Sihanouk, encouraged legalization of same-sex marriage in his country after watching footage of same-sex couples marry in San Francisco. He also declared transgender people should be treated with respect. Source: The Lavender Effect, 2013 clickable news links upcoming CFH events Lesbians Make History With Northern Food for Thought: Body Image & Eating Ireland's First Same-Sex Marriage Disorders in the LGBTQ+ Community Dwyane Wade Shares About Being a Proud February 20, 2020 - 12:00 - 1:30 PM Parent to His Trans Daughter CFH Training Room Ohio bill would send doctors to jail for years Presentation by: Center for Discovery for treating transgender youth 5th grade teacher grilled a girl about a rumor LGBTQ+ Movie & Discussion Event that she’s gay in front of the entire class February 27, 2020 - 12:00 - 3:00 PM CFH Training Room Iowa bill would ban teachers from saying Movie: Love, Simon that Pete Buttigieg is gay without notifying RSVP @ cfhlgbtq.eventbrite.com parents Sources: LGBTQ Nation, The Advocate " W H E N A L L A M E R I C A N S A R E T R E A T E D A S E Q U A L , N O M A T T E R W H O T H E Y A R E O R W H O M T H E Y L O V E , W E A R E A L L M O R E F R E E .
    [Show full text]
  • MANUFACTURING MORAL PANIC: Weaponizing Children to Undermine Gender Justice and Human Rights
    MANUFACTURING MORAL PANIC: Weaponizing Children to Undermine Gender Justice and Human Rights Research Team: Juliana Martínez, PhD; Ángela Duarte, MA; María Juliana Rojas, EdM and MA. Sentiido (Colombia) March 2021 The Elevate Children Funders Group is the leading global network of funders focused exclusively on the wellbeing and rights of children and youth. We focus on the most marginalized and vulnerable to abuse, neglect, exploitation, and violence. Global Philanthropy Project (GPP) is a collaboration of funders and philanthropic advisors working to expand global philanthropic support to advance the human rights of lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and intersex (LGBTI) people in the Global1 South and East. TABLE OF CONTENTS Glossary ...................................................................................... 4 Acronyms .................................................................................................. 4 Definitions ................................................................................................. 5 Letter from the Directors: ......................................................... 8 Executive Summary ................................................................... 10 Report Outline ..........................................................................................13 MOBILIZING A GENDER-RESTRICTIVE WORLDVIEW .... 14 The Making of the Contemporary Gender-Restrictive Movement ................................................... 18 Instrumentalizing Cultural Anxieties .........................................
    [Show full text]
  • LGBTQ Leisure Travel to Britain
    USA & Canada Intelligence Report • Summary ReportLGBTQ Market Intelligence Report | March 2019 March 2019 LGBTQ Leisure Travel to Britain Produced by: 1 USA & Canada Intelligence Report • Summary ReportLGBTQ Market Intelligence Report | March 2019 March 2019 LGBTQ Leisure Travel to Britain Please note that this is a summary report of the research. A full 125 slide report is available with additional questions, data and more in-depth analysis and narrative. 2 LGBTQ Market Intelligence Report | March 2019 Table of Contents Data from CMI’s Annual LGBTQ Tourism & Hospitality Surveys, 2017 and 2018 Slides 5 to 9 LGBTQ Leisure Travel to Britain: Research Methodology Slides 10 to 12 United States Results Britain and Its Competitor Set Slides 13 to 21 Understanding LGBTQ Travel Patterns to Britain Slides 22 to 29 Understanding Diversity of LGBTQ Visitors Slides 30 to 35 Top LGBTQ Motivators to Visit Britain Slides 36 to 41 Communicating with the LGBTQ Community Slides 42 to 49 Canadian Results Slides 50 to 58 3 LGBTQ Market Intelligence Report | March 2019 Executive Summary Britain’s Competitor Set Top Motivators to Visit Britain • Britain is the top European destination for LGBTQ leisure travelers. • Historical attractions are more motivating than anticipated and scenic beauty • Competition for LGBTQ leisure travel is substantial. Major barriers include cost, is key. previous visitation, competitive alternative destinations and lack of knowledge of • LGBTQ-specific attractions are motivating but are not the top priority when Britain and its surrounding areas. visiting Britain. • Britain is considered LGBTQ-welcoming and safe, outperforming the majority of • Theatre trips amongst older gay men can drive repeat visits.
    [Show full text]
  • MIAMI UNIVERSITY the Graduate School
    MIAMI UNIVERSITY The Graduate School Certificate for Approving the Dissertation We hereby approve the Dissertation of Bridget Christine Gelms Candidate for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy ______________________________________ Dr. Jason Palmeri, Director ______________________________________ Dr. Tim Lockridge, Reader ______________________________________ Dr. Michele Simmons, Reader ______________________________________ Dr. Lisa Weems, Graduate School Representative ABSTRACT VOLATILE VISIBILITY: THE EFFECTS OF ONLINE HARASSMENT ON FEMINIST CIRCULATION AND PUBLIC DISCOURSE by Bridget C. Gelms As our digital environments—in their inhabitants, communities, and cultures—have evolved, harassment, unfortunately, has become the status quo on the internet (Duggan, 2014 & 2017; Jane, 2014b). Harassment is an issue that disproportionately affects women, particularly women of color (Citron, 2014; Mantilla, 2015), LGBTQIA+ women (Herring et al., 2002; Warzel, 2016), and women who engage in social justice, civil rights, and feminist discourses (Cole, 2015; Davies, 2015; Jane, 2014a). Whitney Phillips (2015) notes that it’s politically significant to pay attention to issues of online harassment because this kind of invective calls “attention to dominant cultural mores” (p. 7). Keeping our finger on the pulse of such attitudes is imperative to understand who is excluded from digital publics and how these exclusions perpetuate racism and sexism to “preserve the internet as a space free of politics and thus free of challenge to white masculine heterosexual hegemony” (Higgin, 2013, n.p.). While rhetoric and writing as a field has a long history of examining myriad exclusionary practices that occur in public discourses, we still have much work to do in understanding how online harassment, particularly that which is gendered, manifests in digital publics and to what rhetorical effect.
    [Show full text]
  • Safe Zone Manual – Edited 9.15.2015 1
    Fall 2015 UCM SAFE ZONE GUIDE FOR ALLIES UCM – Safe Zone Manual – Edited 9.15.2015 1 Contents Safe Zone Program Introduction .............................................................................................................. 4 Terms, Definitions, and Labels ................................................................................................................. 6 Symbols and Flags................................................................................................................................... 19 Gender Identity ......................................................................................................................................... 24 What is Homophobia? ............................................................................................................................. 25 Biphobia – Myths and Realities of Bisexuality ..................................................................................... 26 Transphobia- Myths & Realities of Transgender ................................................................................. 28 Homophobia/biphobia/transphobia in Clinical Terms: The Riddle Scale ......................................... 30 How Homophobia/biphobia/transphobia Hurts Us All......................................................................... 32 National Statistics and Research Findings ........................................................................................... 33 Missouri State “Snapshot” ......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding Inequality: Social Costs and Benefits Zu | Schriften Der Zeppelin Universität Zwischen Wirtschaft, Kultur Und Politik
    zu | schriften der Zeppelin Universität Amanda Machin Nico Stehr Editors Understanding Inequality: Social Costs and Benefits zu | schriften der Zeppelin Universität zwischen Wirtschaft, Kultur und Politik Herausgegeben von S. A. Jansen, N. Stehr, E. Schröter, Zeppelin Universität, Friedrichshafen, Deutschland [email protected] Amanda Machin · Nico Stehr (Eds.) Understanding Inequality: Social Costs and Benefits [email protected] Editors Dr. Amanda Machin Prof. Dr. Nico Stehr Zeppelin Universität Friedrichshafen, Deutschland zu | schriften der Zeppelin Universität ISBN 978-3-658-11662-0 ISBN 978-3-658-11663-7 (eBook) DOI 10.1007/978-3-658-11663-7 Library of Congress Control Number: 2016935981 Springer VS © Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH 2016 This work is subject to copyright. All rights are reserved by the Publisher, whether the whole or part of the material is concerned, specifically the rights of translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on microfilms or in any other physical way, and transmission or information storage and retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology now known or hereafter developed. The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, service marks, etc. in this publication does not imply, even in the absence of a specific statement, that such names are exempt from the relevant protective laws and regulations and therefore free for general use. The publisher, the authors and the editors are safe to assume that the advice and information in this book are believed to be true and accurate at the date of publication. Neither the publisher nor the authors or the editors give a warranty, express or implied, with respect to the material contained herein or for any errors or omissions that may have been made.
    [Show full text]
  • LGBTQ+ MOVEMENTS & ACTIVISMS WST 6935, Section 17F1, Class Number
    LGBTQ+ MOVEMENTS & ACTIVISMS WST 6935, Section 17F1, Class Number: 21172 Mondays, Periods 6-8 (12:50-3:50pm) Ustler 108 Kendal L. Broad, Ph.D. Office Hours: Office: USTLER 301 Tuesdays, 11:30am-2:30pm Phone: (352) 273-0389 and by appointment Email: [email protected] NOTE: Unavailable 9/11 & 10/2 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- COURSE DESCRIPTION There are many ways to study and critically understand lesbian, gay, bisexual, same gender loving, transsexual, transgender, intersex, two-spirit, queerPOC, ally, pansexual, asexual, queer, gender- nonconforming (and more) social justice praxis and activist work. This course will center on considerations (including critiques) of LGBTQ+ social movement strategies. In that regard, it is a course designed to answer the question of how LGBTQ+ social movement work is done (and, to some degree, undone). While there is a range of literatures taking up this question, this seminar is anchored especially in sociological LGBTQ+ social movement research, LGBTQ+ social movement history, and interdisciplinary LGBTQ+ and Sexuality Studies. One aim of the course is to consider recent research engaging core concepts arising from Queer Studies, Queer of Color critique, Intersex studies, Transgender studies and more. A related goal is to engage empirical research while being mindful of critiques of empiricism, especially in relation to LGBTQ+ lives and activisms. As well the course is designed with a certain wariness of embedded patterns erasure and epistemic violence attached to academic incorporation of activist work and so is structured to attend to concepts relevant to LGBTQ + activists and attentive to activist voices and materials. The syllabus for this course should not be read as a comprehensive overview of a field, for there is a good deal of important material left out.
    [Show full text]
  • Meet Nasty Habit Cherry Bomb Review Mental Illness In
    MEET NASTY HABIT CHERRY BOMB REVIEW MENTAL ILLNESS IN THE MUSIC INDUSTRY 20 WATTS | 1 01 // THE CITY - THE 1975 02 // YESTERDAY - ATMOSPHERE 03 // GRINDIN’ - CLIPSE 04 // AFRICA - TOTO 05 // GRAVITY - TURNSTILE 06 // CLUSH - ISLES & GLACIERS 07 // R U MINE? - ARCTIC MONKEYS 08 // CLARK GABLE - POSTAL SERVICE 09 // CAROLINA - SEU JORGE 10 // NO ROOM IN FRAME - DEATH CAB FOR CUTIE 11 // JESUS TAKE THE WHEEL - CARRIE UNDERWOOD 12 // A WALK - TYCHO 13 // SEDATED - HOZIER 14 // HEY YA! - OUTKAST 15 // MY BODY - YOUNG THE GIANT 16 // DREAMS - FLEETWOOD MAC 17 // PAST LIVES - BØRNS 18 // PLEASE DON’T - LEO STANARD TWEET @20_WATTS WHAT 19 // TOTALLY FUCKED - JONATHAN GROFF YOU’RE LISTENING TO! 20 // TUBTHUMPING - CHUMBAWAMBA Cover Photo by Adam Gendler 2 | 20 WATTS 20 WATTS | 3 20 WAT TSSPRING 2015 WE ASKED: WHAT IS YOUR EMOJI STORY? LYNDSEY JIMENEZ RIKKI SCHNEIDERMAN ADAM GENDLER JANE DEPGEN PHIL DECICCA EDITOR IN CHIEF MANAGING EDITOR MULTIMEDIA CREATIVE DIRECTOR HEAD DESIGNER MIKEY LIGHT SAM HENKEN JACKIE FRERE TIFFANY GOMEZ JOEY COSCO JAKE LIBASSI FEATURES EDITOR ASSISTANT FEATURES FRONT OF BOOK PHOTO EDITOR DIGITAL DIRECTOR WEB EDITOR A SPECIAL THANKS TO OUR CONTRIBUTORS: KAITLIN GRENIER COLE HOCK TOMMY ENDE KENNY ENDE ERIN SINGLETON CAROLYN SAXTON KATIE CANETE JIM COLEMAN WILL SKALMOSKI COPY EDITOR REVIEWS + PUBLICIST PUBLISHER MARKETING SOCIAL MEDIA 4 | 20 WATTS 20 WATTS | 5 TABLE OF CONTENTS 08 LETTER FROM THE EDITOR 10 THE FIVE 11 EAR TO THE GROUND 12 ON THE GRIND 13 PLAYLIST // 20 WATTS GOES ABROAD 15 BACK FROM THE DEAD 16 DROP THE MIC // SEXUALITY IN MUSIC 18 A DAY IN THE LIFE W/ NASTY HABIT 22 WHAT IS EDM? 24 2015: THE YEAR OF HIP-HOP 26 REVIEW // CHERRY BOMB 28 Q&A // RICKY SMITH 31 HEADSPACE 34 DIY, YOU WON’T 38 FUSION FRENZY 42 BACK OF BOOK LETTER 6 | 20 WATTS 20 WATTS | 7 There’s a lot that goes into making a magazine — a lot of arguments, a lot of cuts, a whole lotta shit that you probably don’t even think about as you’re holding this book in your hands right now.
    [Show full text]
  • Flag Definitions
    Flag Definitions Rainbow Flag : The rainbow flag, commonly known as the gay pride flag or LGBTQ pride flag, is a symbol of lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer pride and LGBTQ social movements. Always has red at the top and violet at the bottom. It represents the diversity of gays and lesbians around the world. Bisexual Pride Flag: Bisexuality is romantic attraction, sexual attraction, or sexual behaviour toward both males and females, or to more than one sex or gender. Pink represents sexual attraction to the same sex only (gay and lesbian). Blue represents sexual attraction to the opposite sex only (Straight). Purple represents sexual attraction to both sexes (bi). The key to understanding the symbolism of the Bisexual flag is to know that the purple pixels of colour blend unnoticeably into both pink and blue, just as in the “real world” where bi people blend unnoticeably into both the gay/lesbian and straight communities. Transgender Pride Flag: Transgender people have a gender identity or gender expression that differs from their assigned sex. Blue stripes at top and bottom is the traditional colour for baby boys. Pink stipes next to them are the traditional colour for baby girls. White stripe in the middle is for people that are nonbinary, feel that they don’t have a gender. The pattern is such that no matter which way you fly it, it is always correct, signifying us finding correctness in our lives. Intersex Pride Flag: Intersex people are those who do not exhibit all the biological characteristics of male or female, or exhibit a combination of characteristics, at birth.
    [Show full text]
  • LGBT Identity and Crime
    LGBT Identity and Crime LGBT Identity and Crime* JORDAN BLAIR WOODS** Abstract Recent studies report that LGBT adults and youth dispropor- tionately face hardships that are risk factors for criminal offending and victimization. Some of these factors include higher rates of poverty, over- representation in the youth homeless population, and overrepresentation in the foster care system. Despite these risk factors, there is a lack of study and available data on LGBT people who come into contact with the crim- inal justice system as offenders or as victims. Through an original intellectual history of the treatment of LGBT identity and crime, this Article provides insight into how this problem in LGBT criminal justice developed and examines directions to move beyond it. The history shows that until the mid-1970s, the criminalization of homosexuality left little room to think of LGBT people in the criminal justice system as anything other than deviant sexual offenders. The trend to decriminalize sodomy in the mid-1970s opened a narrow space for schol- ars, advocates, and policymakers to use antidiscrimination principles to redefine LGBT people in the criminal justice system as innocent and non- deviant hate crime victims, as opposed to deviant sexual offenders. Although this paradigm shift has contributed to some important gains for LGBT people, this Article argues that it cannot be celebrated as * Originally published in the California Law Review. ** Assistant Professor of Law, University of Arkansas School of Law, Fayetteville. I am thankful for the helpful suggestions from Samuel Bray, Devon Carbado, Maureen Carroll, Steve Clowney, Beth Colgan, Sharon Dolovich, Will Foster, Brian R.
    [Show full text]
  • LGBTQ in the Music Business: Where Is the Representation? @Glaad #Musicbiz2017 Our Panel
    LGBTQ in the Music Business: Where is the Representation? @glaad #musicbiz2017 Our Panel Zeke Stokes Cody Alan Kristen Ellis- Ty Herndon Matt Yazge Vice President Host/Producer Henderson Songwriter & Head of Brand GLAAD CMT/iHeartRadio Guitarist/Founder Recording Artist Partnerships Antigone Rising Nielsen Music Our Panel @zekestokes @CMTCody @antigonerising @tyherndoncom @MattYazge Who is GLAAD? The world’s gay, lesbian, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ) media advocacy organization Source: Harris Poll 1. Young people are more likely to identify as LGBTQ 2. Young people are much more likely to be LGBTQ allies Music is important to LGBT fans They are a passionate consumer group for the music industry Music Fans: Live Music: Passion: 92% 68% 53% of LGBT consumers consider Attend at least one live music of LGBT music listeners say they would themselves music fans event in a year be completely lost without their music (vs 63% for non-LGBT) Nielsen Live 360 2016 LGBT Audience important across distribution How Do You Listen to Music? (Past 12 month usage) LGBT Non-LGBT 80% 70% 70% 60% 51% 51% 50% 44% 44% 44% 38% 38% 40% 33% 28%31% 30% 24% 23% 20% 20% 9% 10% 6% 0% Songs from Regular Video On Demand CDs Programmed Satellite Radio Vinyl your own AM/FM Radio Streaming Audio Audio records/LPs digital music station (over Streaming Streaming library the air) Nielsen M360 2016 Q68 / Q69. In the past 12 months, which of the following did you use to listen to music? / In a typical week, which of the following do you use to listen to music? Q79a.
    [Show full text]