Upgrading the World's Oldest Underground Metro – a Signalling

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Upgrading the World's Oldest Underground Metro – a Signalling Upgrading the world’s Oldest underground Metro – A Signalling Engineer’s View Mike Harvie, Head of Signalling, London Underground TfL Rail & Underground: The network today • 7 modes • 15 lines • Over 430 stations • Over 1200km of track • 1.6 Billion Passenger Journeys/year • Capital programme: £1.6 Bn/year Railway Infrastructure takes time to change 1863 2013 Upgrade plan • Asset renewal: replacing life- expired assets with modern equivalent forms e.g. conventional signalling to CBTC • Capacity: increasing network peak capacity by 30% through line upgrade programme: new trains, track and signalling AND • Stations: rebuilding busiest stations: Tottenham Court Road, Victoria, Bond Street, Bank, Paddington; upgrading others with CCTV and better communication systems Magnitude of demand – London Underground rail journeys take place every day across Rail & 4.8 Underground’s network million of all UK rail journeys are directly provided by Rail & Underground, meaning we not only support 54 travel around London but also connections across percent the country 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 2003/04 2004/05 2005/06 2006/07 2007/08 2008/09 2009/10 2010/11 2011/12 2012/13 Demand (Passenger Journeys) Service Volume (Train KMs) The TfL Journey Line System Year Docklands Light Seltrac IS from 1995 Railway Jubilee Line Seltrac IS – 30 tph 2011 Victoria Line Invensys DTG-R – 33tph 2011 Northern Line Seltrac IS – up to 30 tph 2014 Hammersmith & City Seltrac IS (Radio) – up to 32 tph 2022 Line 4LM Circle Line Seltrac IS (Radio) – up to 32 tph 2022 District Line Seltrac IS (Radio) – up to 32 tph 2022 Metropolitan Line Seltrac IS (Radio) – up to 32 tph 2022 Piccadilly Line In Tender phase – GoA3/4 TBC Waterloo & City Line In Tender phase – GoA3/4 TBC DTUP Central Line In Tender phase – GoA3/4 TBC Bakerloo Line In Tender phase – GoA3/4 TBC What do we want ? More capacity & Reduced journey times Jubilee line Victoria line Northern line Average journey time Average journey time Average journey time 15.4 13.8 13.4 min min 11.5 11.1 min min min 9.6 min Pre-upgrade Post-upgrade Pre-upgrade Post-upgrade Pre-upgrade Post-upgrade We replaced signalling We replaced trains and We replaced signalling to reduce the average signalling to reduce the to reduce the average journey time by 1 average journey time by journey time by 1 minute and 49 seconds. 1 minute and 31 seconds minute and 37 seconds. This saves the average This saves the average This saves the average commuter 13.7 hours commuter 11.5 hours commuter 12.2 hours travelling time per year travelling time per year travelling time per year Victoria Line Upgrade Jubilee Line Upgrade Delivery – 2010 funding settlement • Thales S40 moving block ATO system • 63 trains • 7th car 1969: World’s first Automatic Railway Now: 650,000 passengers/day • New 47 x 8 Car ’09TS Fleet with onboard • Power, depot signalling (supplied by Bombardier and and many Invensys) other • 43 Trains (Peak) – 31 Trains (Off-Peak) enabling 33% increase in capacity 21% increase in capacity • First ATO-on-ATO upgrade in world • Power, depot and other enabling works works Changes to the railway (Jubilee & Northern lines) • Significant train wiring modifications • In-cab displays introduced • Trackside signals removed • CBTC signage introduced • Inductive loop on track bed • Secondary train detection system Jubilee line - planned migration Original plan • Preliminary “dual-fitted area” (DFA) (J1) • Original plan - 4 small migration stages (J2, J3, J4 & J5) Dual-Fitted Area Purpose: • Provide Train Operators with experience of driving with the in-cab display • Assist with evidence to assure final system Results: • Identified several issues – both technical and human factors • Useful data obtained, but DFA software became more diverged from the final product. Jubilee line – final migration Original plan Final plan • Preliminary “dual-fitted area” (DFA) (J1) • Final implementation – 2 migration stages (J234 & J5) Systems Testing on Jubilee line • Partial line closures at weekends – Large number of them – Inconvenienced large numbers of passengers on a regular basis – Not always used effectively • equipment failures or software errors leading to testing time being lost • logistics planning issues • some weekends ear-marked as available for testing ended up being used for installation • Different approach used on Northern line – (details to follow later in presentation) Final commissioning dates • DFA – March 2008 • J234 Revenue Service - 29th December 2010 • J5 Revenue Service – 26th June 2011 14 Jubilee reliability trends – first 2 years Early Second J5 Reliability Olympics Steady State Days Phase Phase Improvement Realising the benefits Key Lessons Learned • “One Team” approach • Cost of on-railway testing • Challenge of applying new technology to an existing railway with strong existing standards and operating principles. Need to ensure clear, early definition of: - signalling principles - operational requirements • Importance of Stakeholder engagement • Technology challenges • Challenge of large migration areas • Reliability growth before and after commissioning Northern Line – Growth and Demand • Busiest line on the London Underground network with 900,000 customers per day • 6 branches – most complex manually operated railway in Europe • 18.5% growth in demand in last five years Original Northern Line Infrastructure • Fixed block signalling up to 50 years old • Controlled via program machine architecture from 1960s, including hardwired control desks • 106 trains (1995TS) with performance downgraded to match old trains (1959TS) – 1.24 ms-2 acceleration (existing 0.9 ms-2) • Circa 1000 people to be trained Northern Line Closure Plan Old plan (2010) 65 closures, 20 of which were full line 16 months of early closing (Monday – Thursday) New plan (2011) 16 closures, 8 of which are full line 6 partial line closures during Easter and Christmas Sunday late starting from 08:30 Northern Line Migration Areas • 6 migration areas planned • Commissioned as planned (i.e. no combining of areas as on Jubilee line) • New Service Control Centre (covering whole line) commissioned at same time as NMA1 Performance Monitoring: Reliability Objective Groups - ROGs • Suite of tests carried out on parts of the system prior to commissioning into service, typically during normal traffic hours • ROG1 – train systems • ROG2 – loops & wayside • ROG3 – axle counters • Provided proof that the installed system was reliable and that identified issues had been fixed prior to revenue service • Success was measured against criteria generated from the final system reliability requirements ROG2 Output Other tools Virtual test trolley • Allows some basic testing (signal strength, loop layout, etc.) without needing a test train • No need to keep traction current on, so easier access for parallel activities NMA1-6 Commissioning dates: NMA1 – 17/02/2013, NMA2 – 21/06/2013, NMA3 – 25/10/2013, NMA4 – 17/01/2014, NMA5 – 21/03/2014, NMA6 – 30/05/2014 Reliability NL reliability – 28 day average (1st year) 27 NL reliability – 28 day average (2nd year) 28 Northern Line Upgrade: In Numbers The Project in Numbers Assets • 37 New SERs • Appx 350 km of Loop Cable • 2 Change Over Cubicles • 14 Plate Racks Testing Completed • 3500 PICO Tests Cases • 2350 LCT Test Cases • 1550 Data Comms Test Cases • 1020 PLC Test Cases • 1600 VCC Test Cases • 95 SMC Test Cases How have we achieved this • No significant Safety Incidents • 32 Numbers of Project Gate Reviews • 44 SRPs • 39 Weekend closures/possessions • 1000’s of hours of cancelled/ engineering hours 29 Realisation of Capacity doesn’t have to be painful Latest Modernisation: Transforming the Circle, District, Hammersmith & City and Metropolitan lines - Learning the Lessons Overview • 1m+ passengers daily • Paddington-Farringdon is world’s • 26% of LU total oldest underground railway (1863) • Makes up 40% of LU network • Trains up to 50 years old (A Stock) • Signalling - some parts from 1920s Peak Capacity Increase Peak capacity increase delivered 60% 50% S ignals 40% 30% 20% S ignals S ignals Trains 10% Trains Trains Met Dis tric t C &H 27% 24% 65% • 1395 cars: 15% more than now •Huge increase in capacity • Air-conditioned trains, LU’s first Met 27% / Dist 24% / C&H 65% • Over 150 of 191 new trains delivered • Major depot, power, platform •32tph in central section (27 now) lengthening works Migration Plan: • Consider risk • Start small • Supporting revenue takes effort • No Cul-De-Sacs Dedicated Test Track Progress – Melton RIDC • The baseline configuration is based on 1xVCC and 2xSCSs with the target radios, axle counters and tags installed trackside. • The guideway is designed to exercise all train modes to ensure that the vehicle interface is fully tested prior to production and revenue service, this is one of the lessons learnt from JNUP. • Dynamic testing with first prototype train began in 2015 (less than 6 months from contract award) • Full system ATO testing has commenced Migration Sequence The Next Generation of Upgrades on the London Underground Network Realisation of Capacity - Again • CBTC will remove the traditional signalling constraints • CBTC will present latent capacity • If not seen early, this will generate a further, post CBTC commissioning, series of further enhancements • Jubilee Line 2 – targeting 36tph with additional trains • Northern Line 2 – seeking to enhance its capacity by 10-15% with additional trains • Victoria Line 2 – minor modifications underway to achieve 36tph (April 2017) Northern Line Mid 2020s – New trains on Piccadilly line >60% +19,000 capacity passenger increase s per hour The Next Generation of Line Upgrades Bakerloo line Central line •25% more capacity • 25% more capacity • 8,000 additional passengers per hour • 12,000 additional passengers per hour Waterloo & City line • 50% more capacity • 9,000 additional passengers/hour Conclusion • London, like many cities is rapidly out-growing its metro, demanding the highest capacity upgrades in difficult brownfield sites. • London Underground has learnt many lessons in applying CBTC solutions. • These lessons are being applied on its largest re- signalling project yet. • These lessons may also help you in your challenges.
Recommended publications
  • Rail Accident Report
    Rail Accident Report Penetration and obstruction of a tunnel between Old Street and Essex Road stations, London 8 March 2013 Report 03/2014 February 2014 This investigation was carried out in accordance with: l the Railway Safety Directive 2004/49/EC; l the Railways and Transport Safety Act 2003; and l the Railways (Accident Investigation and Reporting) Regulations 2005. © Crown copyright 2014 You may re-use this document/publication (not including departmental or agency logos) free of charge in any format or medium. You must re-use it accurately and not in a misleading context. The material must be acknowledged as Crown copyright and you must give the title of the source publication. Where we have identified any third party copyright material you will need to obtain permission from the copyright holders concerned. This document/publication is also available at www.raib.gov.uk. Any enquiries about this publication should be sent to: RAIB Email: [email protected] The Wharf Telephone: 01332 253300 Stores Road Fax: 01332 253301 Derby UK Website: www.raib.gov.uk DE21 4BA This report is published by the Rail Accident Investigation Branch, Department for Transport. Penetration and obstruction of a tunnel between Old Street and Essex Road stations, London 8 March 2013 Contents Summary 5 Introduction 6 Preface 6 Key definitions 6 The incident 7 Summary of the incident 7 Context 7 Events preceding the incident 9 Events following the incident 11 Consequences of the incident 11 The investigation 12 Sources of evidence 12 Key facts and analysis
    [Show full text]
  • Uncovering the Underground's Role in the Formation of Modern London, 1855-1945
    University of Kentucky UKnowledge Theses and Dissertations--History History 2016 Minding the Gap: Uncovering the Underground's Role in the Formation of Modern London, 1855-1945 Danielle K. Dodson University of Kentucky, [email protected] Digital Object Identifier: http://dx.doi.org/10.13023/ETD.2016.339 Right click to open a feedback form in a new tab to let us know how this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Dodson, Danielle K., "Minding the Gap: Uncovering the Underground's Role in the Formation of Modern London, 1855-1945" (2016). Theses and Dissertations--History. 40. https://uknowledge.uky.edu/history_etds/40 This Doctoral Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the History at UKnowledge. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations--History by an authorized administrator of UKnowledge. For more information, please contact [email protected]. STUDENT AGREEMENT: I represent that my thesis or dissertation and abstract are my original work. Proper attribution has been given to all outside sources. I understand that I am solely responsible for obtaining any needed copyright permissions. I have obtained needed written permission statement(s) from the owner(s) of each third-party copyrighted matter to be included in my work, allowing electronic distribution (if such use is not permitted by the fair use doctrine) which will be submitted to UKnowledge as Additional File. I hereby grant to The University of Kentucky and its agents the irrevocable, non-exclusive, and royalty-free license to archive and make accessible my work in whole or in part in all forms of media, now or hereafter known.
    [Show full text]
  • The Evolution of Train Services on the Met and Gc Line
    THE EVOLUTION OF TRAIN SERVICES ON THE MET AND GC LINE by Eric Stuart (Readers may find reference to the Four-Tracking article in the July 2018 issue of Underground News helpful) After the Great Central (GC) arrived at Quainton Road and the service south thereof became established, both the GC and the Metropolitan Railway (Met.) provided services. However, the personalities at the heads of the two companies did not enjoy the best of relationships. Matters came to a head when a GC train crashed when failing to reduce speed over the (then) reverse curve into Aylesbury station in 1904. About that time, both the leaders retired and a period of better relations between the companies began. On 2 April 1906, the Metropolitan & Great Central Joint Railway (MGCJR) was created. This latter took over the lines of the Metropolitan Railway north and west of Harrow South Junction, with the exception of the branch to Uxbridge. These included the main line between Harrow-on-the-Hill and Verney Junction and the branch from Chalfont & Latimer to Chesham. The MGCJR was created under the terms of the Metropolitan & Great Central Railway Act, which received Royal Assent on 4 August 1905. At the same time, the Great Central and Great Western Joint Railway was formed, covering the lines south of Aylesbury via Princes Risborough to Northolt Junction. This was the result of a new line that aided the GC by partly avoiding congestion on the Met. and also giving the Great Western a shorter route to Birmingham1. One curiosity was that a Joint Committee was set up to manage a new Aylesbury station, jointly owned by two joint railways! Some points on terminology: The new line was commonly called just ‘The Joint Line’ and, even in later LT days, some staff still belonged to a particular class that made them feel superior to others2.
    [Show full text]
  • Seltrac® CBTC Communications- Based Train Control for Urban Rail
    www.thalesgroup.com GROUND TRANSPORTATION SelTrac® CBTC communications- based train control for urban rail World-leading THE BUSINESS CASE FOR SelTrac CBTC ® SelTrac CBTC Solutions Optimising capital investment Capacity enhancement • Shorter platforms due to shorter, more frequent trains • Aging metro infrastructures can be modernized HIGH PERFORMANCE • SOUND INVESTMENT – MTR West Rail saved 384 million USD for nine and operational capacity increased with SelTrac: stations – San Francisco MUNI SelTrac system solutions readily meet your needs to move more • Avoidance of building new tunnels (re-signalling) • London Underground, one of the world’s oldest & people more quickly and increase revenue potential. – San Francisco MUNI doubled their existing tunnel largest metros: capacity from 23 to 48 trains per hour with – Jubilee (2011): 35 km, 63 trains installation of SelTrac saving 1.3 billion USD – Northern (2014): 57 km, 106 trains – Piccadilly (2014): 71 km, 92 trains 20% capacity Equipment minimisation improvement due to signaling; Minimum impact to • No traditional ancillary equipment required if mixed- ongoing revenue operations mode is not part of normal operation – No need for new “fallback” system Energy Savings • Less equipment • Energy-optimized driving profiles (e.g. coasting, reduced – On the track speeds, and reduced acceleration curves) can be based – Due to integration of functions on time of day • Schedule synchronization for regenerative power saving Ease of expansion – Hong Kong saves an estimated 2 Million USD per • Once
    [Show full text]
  • Integrating CBTC Green Field and Re-Signalling Experience IRSTE/ IRSE International Convention, New Delhi April 27 Th & 28 Th 2012
    www.thalesgroup.com/canada Integrating CBTC Green Field and Re-signalling Experience IRSTE/ IRSE International Convention, New Delhi April 27 th & 28 th 2012 Hugo Ramos Transportation Systems - Signalling for Urban Rail 2 / Agenda Communication Based-Train Control Market requirements & implementation challenges Sharing experiences – project challenges & achievements Transportation Systems - Signalling for Urban Rail 3 / Thales signalling solutions for urban rail A complete portfolio of systems and related services enabling urban rail operators to take full advantage of the most advanced signalling solutions Centralise & automate the operation of Rail network the rail network management Operation & Control Centre (OCC) Route control Train control Set dedicated routes within the rail network to Supervise & control safely train movement and ensure train movement speed with on-board & trackside equipment Electronic interlocking Communications Based Train Control (CBTC) Rail field equipment Trackside equipment installed in the rail network Axle counter, point machine, signal Transportation Systems - Signalling for Urban Rail 4 / Communications Based Train Control (CBTC) The most advanced signalling solution available today for metros and people movers CBTC as defined in IEEE 1474.1 Train location determination to a high precision, independent of track circuits Continuous , bi-directional Radio Frequency (RF) communications between train and wayside, to permit the transfer of significantly more control and status data than is possible
    [Show full text]
  • Retro Underground: the Seventies to the Noughties – 3
    RETRO UNDERGROUND: THE SEVENTIES TO THE NOUGHTIES – 3. OTHER EVENTS by Tony Morgan My earliest memories of the Underground are during the Second World War travelling from Kingsbury on the Bakerloo Line into London and sometimes on to Kent on the Southern Railway to visit relations. In 1968, after ten years of driving to North Acton, I started commuting in to Great Portland Street. While I was there the second section of the Victoria Line opened as far as Warren Street. One lunchtime I decided to have a quick trip on it. The 1967 Stock train came in to reverse back. The Train Operator was standing in the cab with his back to the direction of travel as the ATO stopped the train. Maybe this was being done to build confidence in the new control system. Travelling home one day from Great Portland Street I saw the latest LT Magazine on display in the ticket office. I then started buying it on a regular basis. The front cover of that first edition had a photograph of the C69 Stock about to be introduced on the Circle Line on it. From that magazine I found out about ‘The Last Drop’ event at Neasden Depot, on Sunday 6 June 1971 advertised, which celebrated the end of use of steam locomotives for engineers’ operations. There I joined the Society because of their Sales Stand. This was my first organised event. At this event all three remaining locomotives were in steam. L94 hauled a rake of engineers’ vehicles from the City and pulled into one of two Klondyke Sidings in Neasden depot.
    [Show full text]
  • Westminster, St. James's, Belgravia, Mayfair
    Map of Public T ransport Connections in Westminster, St. James’s, Belgravia & Mayfair including Charing Cross, V ictoria & Victoria Coach Stations (click on bus/coach route numbers / train line labels for timetable information) This map does not show Use the Adobe Reader “Find” function to coach/commuter routes. search for streets, stations, places and bus routes “New Bus for London” last updated August 2021 are in service on Routes 3, 8, 9, 1 1, 12, 15, 16, 19, 21, 24, 27, 38, 55, 59, 68, 73, 76, 87, 91, 137, 148, 149, 159, 168, 176, 189, 21 1, 253, 254, 267, 313, 390, 453, EL1, EL2, EL3 6 Aldwych 12 Oxford Circus Margaret Street Fully electric buses in London on routes: 9 Aldwych Oxford Circus, Camden Town, 7, 23, 43, 46, 49*, 63*, 65*, 69, 70, 94, 100, 106, 1 11*, 125*, 132*,Aldwych, 134, St. 153, Paul’ s, Bank, 88 Kentish Town, Parliament Hill Fields 11 160*, 173, 174, 180*, 183*, 184, 200, 204*, 212, 214, 230, 235*, 281*, 290*, Moorgate Eldon Street 94 Oxford Circus, Marble Arch, Notting Hill, Aldwych, St. Paul’s, Tower Gateway, Shepherd’s Bush, Acton Green South Parade 15 Aldgate, Limehouse, Poplar, Blackwall Station Oxford Circus, Marylebone, St. John’s Wood, 312, 319*, 323, 357, 358*, 360, 371*, 398*, 444, 484, 507, 521, 660*, 139 West Hampstead, Golders Green 692, 699, C1, C3, C10, H9*, H10*, P5, U5*, W15*, X140*, N7*, N65* 87 Aldwych 159 Oxford Circus * indicates conversion to electric buses during 2021/22 Holborn, Euston, King’s Cross, Holloway, 91 Hornsey Rise, Crouch End Elmfield Avenue 453 Oxford Circus, Marylebone Station 139 Aldwych, Waterloo Station Tottenham Court Road, Camden Town, Aldwych, Waterloo, Camberwell Green, N3 Oxford Circus Harewood Place 24 Chalk Farm, Hampstead Heath South End Green 176 East Dulwich, Forest Hill, Penge Pawleyne Arms Tottenham Court Road, Tottenham Ct.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 a Report by Sawtag Opposing
    A REPORT BY SAWTAG OPPOSING THE CLOSURE OF WATFORD METROPOLITAN STATION AND ITS ASSOCIATED ROUTE. ALL OF THESE ARE TO BE SAFEGUARDED UNDER EXTRACTED GOVERNMENT POLICY. This report opposes the closure of Watford (Metropolitan Line) Station on three major grounds. 1 Retaining peak, football and special traffic, and positively building up traffic. Both the Metropolitan Line and WCML/Watford Suburban Lines serve nearby Wembley Stadium extremely well already. Also, train portion working must be advanced to best practice elsewhere. 2 Facilitating the forming of an extended London Overground network, through the extracted Government Policy of better protection, critical in developing rail infrastructure and interchange. 3 Essential safeguards are to be put in place to protect the truncated alignment through Watford (Metropolitan Line) Station. Firstly , it is essential the latter station is retained at least for continued peak hours services, in view of the steadily increasing peak and general use of both the London Metropolitan Underground and Network Rail West Coast Main Line centered system. Safeguarding is also essential in order to serve during the interim for Watford Football Club traffic attending the Vicarage Road Stadium. Pending the establishment of a new station; immediately South of the Stadium on the new Croxley Link Line; Watford (Met) Station is to be kept open for both peak and Football traffic with requisite direct connecting buses. These connecting buses will run from a retained Watford Metropolitan Station direct to the Stadium. There was a railway triangle immediately South of the Stadium, and Croxley Moor alternatives (reference no. 8) to the Croxley Link Project; investigated both linking the Rickmansworth LNWR branch corridor west to the Rickmansworth (Met) Main Line towards Aylesbury, and generally reinstating the pre-Beeching railway triangle inter alia.
    [Show full text]
  • Step Free Tube Guide
    How to plan a Tube 123456789 Chalfont & High Barnet Cockfosters Epping Step-free sample journey: A Watford C and DLR journey How to use this map Chesham Latimer Theydon Bois Sudbury Town to Borough B Totteridge & Whetstone Oakwood A Step-free eastbound only B 1 Check your starting and destination This map only shows stations where you can Debden A B Step-free eastbound only stations, plus any connections using the get between the platform and street step-free We have chosen a complex journey which Croxley Southgate B A A Woodside Park Loughton symbols shown in ‘How to use this map’. or change between lines step-free. We have includes all the symbols to show their Amersham Chorleywood Step-free C Then refer to the index overleaf for shown in a lighter shade all other Tube stations. meaning. southbound only B Stanmore Edgware Mill Hill East Arnos Grove Buckhurst Hill A Rickmansworth Moor Park B West Finchley A Stations where you can get between the Sudbury Town Step-free southbound only Roding additional details of access and Find on the map and check Harrow & platform and street step-free are marked with a Northwood A Burnt Oak Bounds Green Valley Chigwell connections at each station. You may the How to use this map section and West Ruislip Wealdstone Canons Park also wish to refer to the Sample journey coloured symbol and a letter. The colour and Index. As the Index shows you will have to Step-free Northwood Hills eastbound only Colindale A Finchley Central Wood Green box in the third column letter show the size of the step and gap Hillingdon Ruislip get on to the Piccadilly line eastbound Pinner A Grange Hill between the platform and the train, as follows: Ruislip Queensbury Woodford B B 2 Check that you can manage the step and platform (trains towards Acton Town) via A A A Manor A Kenton Hendon Central East Finchley Turnpike Lane Step North Harrow Hainault gap from the platform to the train, which Step Station Approach ( B step 153mm/gap Eastcote Seven Blackhorse can be up to 323mm (12.7 inches) for the The step between the platform to the train 107mm).
    [Show full text]
  • London Underground - 150 Years and Beyond
    A London Councils Member briefing January 2014 London Underground - 150 Years and Beyond 2013 saw celebrations of 150 years of an underground railway in London. The underground has changed and shaped the way people live in the capital and this anniversary has provided Transport for London with the opportunity to set out a vision for its future. Overview This briefing summarises Transport for London’s (TfL) vision for the future of the underground (Tube). Gareth Powell, Director of Strategy at London Underground, gave a presentation to the meeting of the Transport and Environment Committee on 12 December 2013. He stated London Underground’s priorities for the future are: • Keeping London Moving- Reliability and safely • Keeping London Growing - Capacity from the current network and from growing the network • Making Life in London Better - Customer service where every journey matters The vision also includes five commitments to Londoners: 1. Introduce a new 24-hour Tube service at weekends 2. Further improve the reliability and capacity of services 3. All Tube stations are controlled and staffed while services operating 4. Make journeys easier for customers – supported by technology 5. Deliver improvements with the best possible value for money Analysis For 150 years the Tube has been constantly evolving to meet the needs of Londoners. Today, the Tube travels 43 million miles and carries over one billion passengers a year. There have been many key milestones since it first opened in 1863, 10 are highlighted below: 1890 First deep level electric Tube railway in the world and access to platforms by hydaulic lift 1905-38 The Tube reshapes suburban London, including the development of ‘Metroland’ 1968-69 First computer-controlled underground railway in the world, with automatic trains and ticket gates 1977 First airport link for the Tube, with Picadilly line extension to Heathrow Central (terminals 1,2 and 3).
    [Show full text]
  • Suggested Alternative Routes During Disruption
    Suggested alternative routes during disruption When Great Northern services from this station are subject to unplanned disruption, we have Issued Date: arranged for your ticket to be accepted as indicated below to get you to your destination May 2018 Suggested alternative route details from Peterborough Great Northern ticket holders To: Suggested routes: There are no practical public transport alternatives to this station. If we are unable to run trains, we will do our best to Cross Country train to Cambridge, Greater Anglia train to Arlesey run replacement buses, however there may be a long wait. London Blackfriars Tottenham Hale, Victoria line to King's Cross St Pancras, If you are able to, we advise you to make your own way to then Circle line to Blackfriars an alternative station There are no practical public transport alternatives to this Cross Country train to Cambridge, Greater Anglia train to station. If we are unable to run trains, we will do our best to London Bridge Tottenham Hale, Victoria line to King's Cross St Pancras, Biggleswade run replacement buses, however there may be a long wait. then Northern line to London Bridge If you are able to, we advise you to make your own way to an alternative station Cross Country train to Cambridge, Greater Anglia train Cross Country train to Cambridge, Greater Anglia train to London King's Tottenham Hale, Victoria line to King's Cross St Pancras, to Tottenham Hale, then Victoria line to King's Cross St City Thameslink Cross then Circle, Hammersmith & City or Metropolitan line to Pancras
    [Show full text]
  • 2014 Report Corporate Responsibility Thales
    www.thalesgroup.com 2014 REPORT Corporate Responsibility CONTENTS 04 PRINCIPLES OF RESPONSIBILITY 05 EDITORIAL 06 2014 HIGHLIGHTS 09 ABOUT THALES A global technology leader Driven by innovation Customer focus Ambition Boost performance improvement programme 21 ETHICS AND CORPORATE RESPONSIBILITY The key to being a responsible business A dedicated organisation Behavioural intelligence Supporting the initiative 31 CUSTOMERS AND SUPPLIERS Integrity and responsible business conduct Strict compliance with export control regulations Responsible purchasing for lasting relationships with suppliers 47 GOVERNANCE AND INVESTORS Ownership structure and corporate governance Transparency and regular dialogue with investors 53 EMPLOYEES Strategic commitments on social responsibility Developing our people Constructive social dialogue A safe and healthy workplace Encouraging diversity and equal opportunities 69 ENVIRONMENT A history of environmental commitment Engaging employees Thales’s “green touch” for sustainable innovation Reducing our environmental footprint 85 COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT The Thales Foundation: innovating for people Policy at country level The 2014 Corporate Responsibility Report illustrates Thales’s commitments and actions in a number of areas of corporate responsibility, including but not limited to the measures in place to ensure compliance. This document can be downloaded in accessible PDF format for blind and partially sighted readers from Thales’s dedicated corporate responsibility internet portal: sustainability.thalesgroup.com
    [Show full text]