DOCSLIB.ORG

Xerox University Microfilms 300 North Zeeb Road Ann Arbor, Michigan 48106 74-2014

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Xerox University Microfilms 300 North Zeeb Road Ann Arbor, Michigan 48106 74-2014 THE REPUBLICAN PARTY IN CALIFORNIA, 1856-1868 Item Type text; Dissertation-Reproduction (electronic) Authors Stanley, Gerald, 1941- Publisher The University of Arizona. Rights Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. Download date 30/09/2021 08:34:09 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/288108 INFORMATION TO USERS This material was produced from a microfilm copy of the original document. While the most advanced technological means to photograph and reproduce this document have been used, the quality is heavily dependent upon the quality of the original submitted. The following explanation of techniques is provided to help you understand markings or patterns which may appear on this reproduction. 1. The sign or "target" for pages apparently lacking from the document photographed is "Missing Page(s)". If it was possible to obtain the missing page(s) or section, they are spliced into the film along with adjacent pages. This may have necessitated cutting thru an image and duplicating adjacent pages to insure you complete continuity. 2. When an image on the film is obliterated with a large round black mark, it is an indication that the photographer suspected that the copy may have moved during exposure and thus cause a blurred image. You will find a good image of the page in the adjacent frame. 3. When a map, drawing or chart, etc., was part of the material being photographed the photographer followed a definite method in "sectioning" the material, it is customary to begin photoing at the upper left hand corner of a large sheet and to continue photoing from left to right in equal sections with a small overlap. If necessary, sectioning is continued again — beginning below the first row and continuing on until complete. 4. The majority of users indicate that the textual content is of greatest value, however, a somewhat higher quality reproduction could be made from "photographs" if essential to the understanding of the dissertation. Silver prints of "photographs" may be ordered at additional charge by writing the Order Department, giving the catalog number, title, author and specific pages you wish reproduced. 5. PLEASE NOTE: Some pages may have indistinct print. Filmed as received. Xerox University Microfilms 300 North Zeeb Road Ann Arbor, Michigan 48106 74-2014 STANLEY, Gerald, 1941- THE REPUBLICAN PARTY IN CALIFORNIA, 1856-1868. The University of Arizona, Ph.D., 1973 History, modern University Microfilms, A XEROX Company, Ann Arbor, Michigan COPYRIGHTED BY GERALD STANLEY 1973 iii THIS DISSERTATION HAS BEEN MICROFILMED EXACTLY AS RECEIVED. THE REPUBLICAN PARTY IN CALIFORNIA, 1856-1868 by Gerald Stanley A Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of the DEPARTMENT OF HISTORY In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY In the Graduate College THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA 19 7 3 THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA GRADUATE COLLEGE I hereby recommend that this dissertation prepared under my direction by Gerald Stanley entitled THE REPUBLICAN PARTY IN CALIFORNIA, 1856-1868 be accepted as fulfilling the dissertation requirement of the degree of DCCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY y^oissertation Director Date ' * After inspection of the final copy of the dissertation, the following members of the Final Examination Committee concur in its approval and recommend its acceptance:- Mi r/j/?3 This approval and acceptance is contingent on the candidate's adequate performance and defense of this dissertation at the final oral examination. The inclusion of this sheet bound into the library copy of the dissertation is evidence of satisfactory performance at the final examination. STATEMENT BY AUTHOR This dissertation has been submitted in partial fulfillment of requirements for an advanced degree at The University of Arizona and is deposited in the University Library to be made available to borrowers under rules of the Library. Brief quotations from this dissertation are allowable without special permission, provided that accurate acknowledgment of source is made. Requests for permission for extended quotation from or reproduction of this manuscript in whole or in part may be granted by the copyright holder. SI GNED: ACKNOWLEDGMENTS For assistance in documenting this interpretation of California's early Republican party, I express gratitude to the staffs of the following institutions: California Historical Society; California State Archives; California State Library; Henry E. Huntington Library; Stanford University Library; University of California, Berkeley, Bancroft Library; University of California, Los Angeles, Graduate Library; University of Southern California, Graduate Library; Arizona Pioneers' Historical Society Library; University of Arizona, Computer Center; University of Arizona, Interlibrary Loan Department; and University of Arizona, Special Collections Department. For their careful reading of the dissertation, I thank Herman E. Bateman, Roger L. Nichols, and especially John V. Mering, who directed the dissertation and served as its most valuable critic. I also express gratitude to my parents and my wife for their patience and encouragement. A University of Arizona Dissertation Fellowship facilitated completion of the study. iv TABLE OF CONTENTS Page LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS vi LIST OF TABLES vii ABSTRACT viii CHAPTER 1. REPUBLICAN ORIGINS: A NEW PARTY 1 2. RACE AND REPUBLICANS: THE 1856 PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION 28 3. CONCESSION AND DEFEAT: 1857-59 56 4. WINNING: THE I860 PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION .... 88 5. THE REPUBLICAN AS EMANCIPATIONIST: 1861-63 . 116 6. THE REPUBLICAN AS ABOLITIONIST: 1864-65 .... 149 7. THE REPUBLICAN AS RADICAL: 1866-67 . 179 8. REPUBLICAN RETREAT: THE 1868 ELECTION AND THE FIFTEENTH AMENDMENT 213 REFERENCES 238 V LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS Figure Page 1. Election Maps 1854, 1855 21 2. Election Maps 1860, 1863 147 3. Election Maps 1864, 1867 211 vi LIST OF TABLES Table Page 1. Pre-1856 Party Affiliation 9 2. Correlation Coefficients of Voting Percentages at the County Level for the 1860 Election 110 3. Correlation Coefficients of Voting Percentages at the County Level for the 1861, 1862, and 1863 Elections 146 vii ABSTRACT The conventional interpretation of California's political history for the Civil War period maintains that provincial issues exerted a dominant influence on the state's politics. In addition to emphasizing personality conflicts between party leaders, historians of California's antebellum politics contend that political divisions stemmed from differing attitudes regarding the construction of a transcontinental railroad. For the Reconstruction period, the railroad subsidy issue stands as the explana­ tion for political divisions as well as election outcomes. In the main, the prevailing thesis subordinates national issues to the largely unchallenged railroad rule of Cali­ fornia politics. The thesis of this dissertation is that the dominant factor in California's early Republican party and in the state's politics during the Civil War and Reconstruction period was race. More than railroads or any other issue, the slavery extension controversy explains the formation of California's Republican party in 1856. Because Whigs, Know- Nothings, and Democrats countenanced the spread of slavery into the western territories, Californians organized a new party that had as its chief goal opposition to the extension of slavery. The slavery issue was new to California politics viii ix as were most of the activists who joined the early Repub­ lican party. When the slavery issue hastened the collapse of California's Whig and Know-Nothing parties, most of their leaders, if they remained active in politics, joined the Democratic party because of its stand on the slavery extension issue. Although the Republicans opposed the extension of slavery into the western territories, they did not oppose slavery itself, as some historians argue. Nor did party members advocate basic rights for the black race. A political consensus on the status of black Americans per­ sisted throughout the antebellum period as Republicans and Democrats disagreed with one another only over the geo­ graphical location of blacks. Notwithstanding this con­ sensus, Democrats effectively labelled Republicans as abolitionists; and by arousing racial fears in other ways, the Democrats won every election until 1860. In the 1860 presidential election, a divided Demo­ cratic party, effective Republican organization, and ex­ ploitation of the slavery and race issues yielded a Repub­ lican victory in California. Then, during the Civil War, the party supported limited emancipation and finally the total abolition of slavery, initially as a means of re­ storing the Union but later as morally urgent. Though Democrats continued to raise the race issue, a patriotic war for the restoration of the Union kept the Republicans in X power. More important, the Civil War and white southern intransigence to any rights for freedmen gradually trans­ formed the Republicans' attitude toward the black race, creating genuine ideological conflict for the first time in California's political history. Unlike the Democrats, Republicans favored granting basic rights to blacks on humanitarian grounds. Democratic racism and Republican radicalism toward the black race peaked in the election of 1867; and, even though the Republican
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Front Matter
    Graham_Presidents & Environment 4/17/15 3:32 PM Page vii © University Press of Kansas. All rights reserved. Reproduction and distribution prohibited without permission of the Press. CONTENTS Acknowledgments ix Introduction 1 1 The New Nation’s Public Lands: A First Century without a National Vision 3 2 Benjamin Harrison, Grover Cleveland, and William McKinley: The Idea of Preserving the Public Lands Finds Cautious Presidential Sponsors, 1891–1901 23 3 Theodore Roosevelt: The Conservation Crusade Welcomes a Presidential Leader, 1901–1909 37 4 William Taft, Woodrow Wilson, Warren Harding, Calvin Coolidge, and Herbert Hoover: The Conservation Agenda, 1910s–1920s 59 5 Franklin D. Roosevelt: Conservation Foundations of New Deal Leadership, 1930s–1940s 114 6 Harry Truman, Dwight Eisenhower, and John F. Kennedy: Growing and Polluting in Boom Times, 1940s–1950s 153 7 Lyndon Baines Johnson, Richard Nixon, Gerald Ford, and Jimmy Carter: Environmentalism Arrives, 1960s–1970s 209 8 Ronald Reagan, George H. W. Bush, and Bill Clinton: Presidents Brown and Pale Green, 1980s–1990s 276 9 George W. Bush and Barack Obama: Wobbly Leaders, 2000– 328 10. Trying Again for Greener Presidents 358 Notes 367 Suggested Further Reading 391 Index 409 Graham_Presidents & Environment 4/17/15 3:32 PM Page viii © University Press of Kansas. All rights reserved. Reproduction and distribution prohibited without permission of the Press. Graham_Presidents & Environment 4/17/15 3:32 PM Page ix © University Press of Kansas. All rights reserved. Reproduction and distribution prohibited without permission of the Press. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I am grateful for research assistance from UNC history graduate students Scott Phillips, Rob Shapard, Carla Hoffman, and Matthew Lubin, and from Kris Smemo and Dustin Walker at the University of California–Santa Bar- bara (history).
    [Show full text]
  • Committee on Appropriations UNITED STATES SENATE 135Th Anniversary
    107th Congress, 2d Session Document No. 13 Committee on Appropriations UNITED STATES SENATE 135th Anniversary 1867–2002 U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE WASHINGTON : 2002 ‘‘The legislative control of the purse is the central pil- lar—the central pillar—upon which the constitutional temple of checks and balances and separation of powers rests, and if that pillar is shaken, the temple will fall. It is...central to the fundamental liberty of the Amer- ican people.’’ Senator Robert C. Byrd, Chairman Senate Appropriations Committee United States Senate Committee on Appropriations ONE HUNDRED SEVENTH CONGRESS ROBERT C. BYRD, West Virginia, TED STEVENS, Alaska, Ranking Chairman THAD COCHRAN, Mississippi ANIEL NOUYE Hawaii D K. I , ARLEN SPECTER, Pennsylvania RNEST OLLINGS South Carolina E F. H , PETE V. DOMENICI, New Mexico ATRICK EAHY Vermont P J. L , CHRISTOPHER S. BOND, Missouri OM ARKIN Iowa T H , MITCH MCCONNELL, Kentucky ARBARA IKULSKI Maryland B A. M , CONRAD BURNS, Montana ARRY EID Nevada H R , RICHARD C. SHELBY, Alabama ERB OHL Wisconsin H K , JUDD GREGG, New Hampshire ATTY URRAY Washington P M , ROBERT F. BENNETT, Utah YRON ORGAN North Dakota B L. D , BEN NIGHTHORSE CAMPBELL, Colorado IANNE EINSTEIN California D F , LARRY CRAIG, Idaho ICHARD URBIN Illinois R J. D , KAY BAILEY HUTCHISON, Texas IM OHNSON South Dakota T J , MIKE DEWINE, Ohio MARY L. LANDRIEU, Louisiana JACK REED, Rhode Island TERRENCE E. SAUVAIN, Staff Director CHARLES KIEFFER, Deputy Staff Director STEVEN J. CORTESE, Minority Staff Director V Subcommittee Membership, One Hundred Seventh Congress Senator Byrd, as chairman of the Committee, and Senator Stevens, as ranking minority member of the Committee, are ex officio members of all subcommit- tees of which they are not regular members.
    [Show full text]
  • Civil Rights Bill Believe 18 Miners Are Trapped, Iatioii Problem That We Can Over­ Criticized the New Haven Rail­ Then Were Confronted with a Come
    ■ A I V '•4a- '- ATcreee Dallj Net PrcM Biiti I ' > For the Week Ended , The Weather ' Marah It, I960 remeMt of 17. 8. Wentker tlnViiCr , Fair, little teraperatara- «feM|a 13,084 toiUglit and Toeaday. Unr t»> Member of the Audit Bight In 30a. High Tlieaday near Bnrewi of CIreuIntten. 40. Mahcheiter— A City of Villnge Char^ VOL. LXXIX, NO. 1.19 (FOURTEEN PAGES) MANCHESTER, CONN., MONDAY, MARCH 14. 1960 (ClBsstfM AdvartislBg p « n u m PRICE n V E CEI ---------------------B------- ------------- Rescuers Near StateNews Roundup 18 Coal Miners Hartford, March 14 (fl*)— After hearing testimony to­ day on the number of loco­ L(^an, W. Va., March 14'|>berrier o f too feet In the No. 4 motives out of service for (JPi— Rescuers got to within tunnel 'of tbe mine repairs, two State Public - Wilson told newsmen early this 80 feet today of where they afternoon, “ We are having a ventb Utilities Commission members Civil Rights Bill believe 18 miners are trapped, iatiOii problem that we can over­ criticized the New Haven rail­ then were confronted with a come. A crew of workmen are road for its maintenance pro­ ' cinder block wall. starting Into the No. 8 heading. gram and said new locomo- However, prospects were bright "Everything is going according tive.s “ are not the answer to for an early braak throu^:h the to .plan, but gentlemen, we’ve hit the problem.” . - barrier, because good air is cir­ so" many hurdles it’s ridiculous.” " As the PUC's probe of the rail­ culating in the area, said Craw­ Wilson said no attempt will be road resumed St's hearing here to­ Penalty Plan Urged ford L.
    [Show full text]
  • Angry Rebels Greet Agnew
    ■ IV y j. ■ ■/ [ t I -4' A v e n g e Daily Net Praea Ran ■W Uto WMk BaM* December M, IM The Weather Clear, quite cold tonight. Loars In teens (5 to 10 In colder val­ leys). Tomorrow cloudineas In­ 15,880 creasing. High in 30s. Wednes­ > \ -4 City of ViOeee Chmrm day's outlook—cloudy. VOL. LXXXEt, NO. 75 (TWENTY-POUR PAGES—TWO SECTIONS) MANCHESTER, CONN., MONDAY, DEIHMBER 29, 1969 AdvertWnc <« Bage >1) PRICE TEN CRNTS ^ 4 ’ Franee Astir Over In Manila Israeli Gunboats W, By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS Angry Rebels to Israel, the Arabs would not Foreign Minister Maurice make a' fUss. Schumann of France has de­ The French ambassador to manded an explanation from I»- Cairo notified Egyptian officials a, rael of how five gunboats Sunday that France was launch­ „ slipped out of Cherbourg deqplte ing a fuU inquiry into the gun­ Greet Agnew an arms embargo, official boat affair. Thq French Embas­ ' "V. 1 BVench sources said t^ a y . sy and Egyptian sources denied new's party of 40 included Apol­ The gunboaU, buUt for Isiwel MANILA (AP) — Anti- that President Gamal Abdel lo astronaut Eugene A. Cer^ before the French embaigoed American demonstrators 10 Nasser had protested^to France. nan, who will present President all arms to Israel Jan. 1, were threw three firecrackers ’The Israeli charge d’affaires Ferdinand Marcos with pfecee reported moving through the t # at Vice President Spiro T. in Paris, Eltan Ronn, met with of moon rock and picturea of the eastern Mediterranean toward French Fm-elgn Minister Mau­ Agnew’s car here today Philippines taken from space.
    [Show full text]
  • Lincoln, Olmsted, and Yosemite: Time for a Closer Look
    Lincoln, Olmsted, and Yosemite: Time for a Closer Look This year is the 150th anniversary of the Yosemite Grant and the act of Congress that set aside Yosemite Valley and the Mariposa Big Tree Grove for “public use, resort, and rec- reation … inalienable for all time.” This “grant” of federal lands transferred Yosemite Valley and the Mariposa Grove to the state of California, yet the 1864 Yosemite Act represents the first significant reservation of public land by the Congress of the United States—to be pre- served in perpetuity for the benefit of the entire nation. As Joseph Sax affirms, “The national parks were born at that moment.”1 In 1890, Congress incorporated Yosemite State Park into a much larger Yosemite National Park. The Yosemite Conservancy is marking the 150th anniversary of the Yosemite Grant by releasing a new publication, Seed of the Future: Yosemite and the Evolution of the Nation­ al Park Idea, authored by the writer and filmmaker Dayton Duncan.2 The handsomely de- signed and generously illustrated book revisits the Yosemite Grant and the “evolution of the national park idea” and should attract a wide readership. This message is important, as the national significance of the Yosemite story has been obscured by time, incomplete documen- tation, and often-contradictory interpretations. A clearer understanding of the people and events surrounding the Yosemite Grant, in such a popular format, is particularly timely, not only for the celebration of Yosemite’s sesquicentennial, but also for the approaching 100th anniversary of the National Park Service (NPS) in 2016. It should be pointed out that Duncan is not the first recognize the significance of the Yosemite Grant.
    [Show full text]
  • Rebel Salvation: the Story of Confederate Pardons
    University of Tennessee, Knoxville TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Doctoral Dissertations Graduate School 12-1998 Rebel Salvation: The Story of Confederate Pardons Kathleen Rosa Zebley University of Tennessee, Knoxville Follow this and additional works at: https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_graddiss Part of the History Commons Recommended Citation Zebley, Kathleen Rosa, "Rebel Salvation: The Story of Confederate Pardons. " PhD diss., University of Tennessee, 1998. https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_graddiss/3629 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized administrator of TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a dissertation written by Kathleen Rosa Zebley entitled "Rebel Salvation: The Story of Confederate Pardons." I have examined the final electronic copy of this dissertation for form and content and recommend that it be accepted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, with a major in History. Paul H. Bergeron, Major Professor We have read this dissertation and recommend its acceptance: Stephen V. Ash, William Bruce Wheeler, John Muldowny Accepted for the Council: Carolyn R. Hodges Vice Provost and Dean of the Graduate School (Original signatures are on file with official studentecor r ds.) To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a dissertation written by Kathleen Rosa Zebley entitled "Rebel Salvation: The Story of Confederate Pardons." I have examined the final copy of this dissertation for form and content and recommend that it be accepted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degreeof Doctor of Philosophy, witha major in History.
    [Show full text]
  • The Democratic Split During Buchanan's Administration
    THE DEMOCRATIC SPLIT DURING BUCHANAN'S ADMINISTRATION By REINHARD H. LUTHIN Columbia University E VER since his election to the presidency of the United States Don the Republican ticket in 1860 there has been speculation as to whether Abraham Lincoln could have won if the Democratic party had not been split in that year.' It is of historical relevance to summarize the factors that led to this division. Much of the Democratic dissension centered in the controversy between President James Buchanan, a Pennsylvanian, and United States Senator Stephen A. Douglas of Illinois. The feud was of long standing. During the 1850's those closest to Buchanan, par- ticularly Senator John Slidell of Louisiana, were personally antagonistic toward Douglas. At the Democratic national conven- tion of 1856 Buchanan had defeated Douglas for the presidential nomination. The Illinois senator supported Buchanan against the Republicans. With Buchanan's elevation to the presidency differences between the two arose over the formation of the cabinet.2 Douglas went to Washington expecting to secure from the President-elect cabinet appointments for his western friends William A. Richardson of Illinois and Samuel Treat of Missouri. But this hope was blocked by Senator Slidell and Senator Jesse D. Bright of Indiana, staunch supporters of Buchanan. Crestfallen, 'Edward Channing, A History of the United States (New York, 1925), vol. vi, p. 250; John D. Hicks, The Federal Union (Boston and New York, 1937), p. 604. 2 Much scholarly work has been done on Buchanan, Douglas, and the Democratic rupture. See Philip G. Auchampaugh, "The Buchanan-Douglas Feud," and Richard R.
    [Show full text]
  • CHAIRMEN of SENATE STANDING COMMITTEES [Table 5-3] 1789–Present
    CHAIRMEN OF SENATE STANDING COMMITTEES [Table 5-3] 1789–present INTRODUCTION The following is a list of chairmen of all standing Senate committees, as well as the chairmen of select and joint committees that were precursors to Senate committees. (Other special and select committees of the twentieth century appear in Table 5-4.) Current standing committees are highlighted in yellow. The names of chairmen were taken from the Congressional Directory from 1816–1991. Four standing committees were founded before 1816. They were the Joint Committee on ENROLLED BILLS (established 1789), the joint Committee on the LIBRARY (established 1806), the Committee to AUDIT AND CONTROL THE CONTINGENT EXPENSES OF THE SENATE (established 1807), and the Committee on ENGROSSED BILLS (established 1810). The names of the chairmen of these committees for the years before 1816 were taken from the Annals of Congress. This list also enumerates the dates of establishment and termination of each committee. These dates were taken from Walter Stubbs, Congressional Committees, 1789–1982: A Checklist (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1985). There were eleven committees for which the dates of existence listed in Congressional Committees, 1789–1982 did not match the dates the committees were listed in the Congressional Directory. The committees are: ENGROSSED BILLS, ENROLLED BILLS, EXAMINE THE SEVERAL BRANCHES OF THE CIVIL SERVICE, Joint Committee on the LIBRARY OF CONGRESS, LIBRARY, PENSIONS, PUBLIC BUILDINGS AND GROUNDS, RETRENCHMENT, REVOLUTIONARY CLAIMS, ROADS AND CANALS, and the Select Committee to Revise the RULES of the Senate. For these committees, the dates are listed according to Congressional Committees, 1789– 1982, with a note next to the dates detailing the discrepancy.
    [Show full text]
  • Codification and the California Mentality Lewis Grossman
    Hastings Law Journal Volume 45 | Issue 3 Article 7 1-1994 Codification and the California Mentality Lewis Grossman Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.uchastings.edu/hastings_law_journal Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Lewis Grossman, Codification and the California Mentality, 45 Hastings L.J. 617 (1994). Available at: https://repository.uchastings.edu/hastings_law_journal/vol45/iss3/7 This Essay is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at UC Hastings Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Hastings Law Journal by an authorized editor of UC Hastings Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Essay Codification and the California Mentality by LEwIS GROSSMAN* Introduction: The Pomeroy Paradox On August 8, 1878, John Norton Pomeroy, the principal instruc- tor at the newly established Hastings College of Law in San Francisco, delivered the school's inaugural address. It was the culminating mo- ment of an exhilarating decade for California's legal profession. Six years earlier, in 1872, California had moved to the forefront of American legal reform by becoming one of the first states in the nation to codify its complete body of laws. The legislature had en- acted the California Code, which included new Civil, Criminal, and Political Codes, as well as a revised Code of Civil Procedure. Com- mittees of prominent attorneys had drafted the Code, basing it largely on the work of the illustrious New York jurist, David Dudley Field.' The centerpiece of the California Code was the Civil Code, which consolidated all of the state's statutory and common-law rules gov- erning private relations (corporations, property, torts, contracts, and domestic matters) into one meticulously arranged volume.2 Only * Associate, Covington & Burling, Washington, D.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Bibliography: a History of the California Supreme Court, 1850–1879 535
    ✯ BIBLIOGRAPHY: A HISTORY OF THE CALIFORNIA SUPREME COURT, 1850–1879 535 BIBLIOGR APHY Laws, Statutes, Court Reports, and Government Documents United States Statutes at Large. Supreme Court Reports. Circuit Court Reports. California Statutes. Supreme Court Reports. California. Legislature. Senate and Assembly Journals (1849–1850). Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court Reports. Books Angel, Myron. History of San Luis Obispo County California. Introduction by Louisiana Clayton Dart. Reproduction of Thompson and West’s 1883 edition. Berkeley: Howell-North Books, 1966. Aptheker, Herbert, ed. A Documentary History of the Negro People in the Unit- ed States. Preface by W. E. B. DuBois. New York: The Citadel Press, 1951. Ayers, James J. Gold and Sunshine; Reminiscences of Early California. Bos- ton: Richard G. Badger, 1922. Baldwin, Joseph Glover. The Flush Times of California. Edited by Richard E. Amacher and George W. Polhemus. Athens: University of Georgia Press, 1966. Bancroft, Hubert Howe. History of California. San Francisco: The History Company, 1890. 536 CALIFORNIA LEGAL HISTORY ✯ VOLUME 14, 2019 Barth, Gunther. Bitter Strength; A History of the Chinese in the United States 1850–1870. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1964. Barry, T. A., and B. A. Patten. San Francisco, California, 1850. Foreword by Joseph A. Sullivan. Oakland: Biobooks, 1947. Bates, J. C., ed. History of the Bench and Bar of California. San Francisco: Bench and Bar Publishing Company, 1912. Bean, Walton. California; An Interpretive History. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company, 1968. Beasley, Delilah L. The Negro Trail Blazers of California. A Compilation of Records from the California Archives in the Bancroft Library at the University of California, in Berkeley; and from the Diaries, Old Papers and Conversations of Old Pioneers in the State of California.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 8 - Executive Politics
    CHAPTER 8 - EXECUTIVE POLITICS TEST BANK MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTIONS 1. Diluted power, independent offices, and multiple avenues for group influence together give California’s executive branch its own form of A. pluralism. B. elitism. C. democracy. D. hyperpluralism. 2. The first governor to serve more than four years in the twentieth century was A. Milton Latham. B. Hiram Johnson. C. Frederick Low. D. Earl Warren. 3. The governor considered aloof and philosophical was A. Pete Wilson. B. Ronald Reagan. C. Earl Warren. D. Jerry Brown. 4. Which of the following is TRUE concerning California governors? A. They can utilize the item veto. B. They have brief “honeymoon” periods. C. They exercise “supreme executive power.” D. All of the above. 154 5. A governor’s personal staff is headed by a A. chief of staff. B. chief assistant. C. foreperson. D. chief operating officer. Copyright © Cengage Learning. All rights reserved. 80 Chapter 8: Executive Politics 6. Governor Pat Brown reorganized numerous departments into A. still more departments. B. superagencies. C. a “kitchen” cabinet. D. a cabinet. 7. The internal budget process is dominated by the A. chief of staff. B. the governor. C. legislative analyst. D. Department of Finance. 8. In budget politics, the “Big Five” has shrunk to the “Big Three,” which refers to the governor and A. Assembly Speaker and his/her appointees. B. Senate Pro Tempore and his/her appointees. C. majority leader from each chamber. D. top officials in the Department of Finance. 9. Once the budget is passed, the governor has power of A. the legislative programs.
    [Show full text]
  • Journal of San Diego History Volume 55 Issue 3
    The Jour nal of Volume 55 Summer 2009 Number 3 • The Journal of San Diego History San Diego History Cover.indd 1 9/8/09 9:56 AM Publication of The Journal of San Diego History is underwritten by a major grant from the Quest for Truth Foundation, established by the late James G. Scripps. Additional support is provided by “The Journal of San Diego Fund” of the San Diego Foundation and private donors. The San Diego Historical Society is a museum, education center, and research library founded in 1928. Its activities are supported by: the City of San Diego’s Commission for Arts and Culture; the County of San Diego; individuals; foundations; corporations; fund raising events; membership dues; admissions; PRESERVE A SaN DIEGO TREASURE shop sales; and rights and reproduction fees. Your $100 contribution will help to create an endowment for Articles appearing in The Journal of San Diego History are abstracted and indexed in Historical Abstracts and America: History and Life. The Journal of San Diego History The paper in the publication meets the minimum requirements of American Please make your check payable to The San Diego Foundation. Indicate on National Standard for Information Science-Permanence of Paper for Printed the bottom of your check that your donation is for The Journal of San Diego Library Materials, ANSI Z39.48-1984. History Fund. The San Diego Foundation accepts contributions of $100 and up. Your contribution is tax-deductible. The San Diego Foundation 2508 Historic Decatur Road, Suite 200 San Diego, CA 92106 (619) 235-2300 or (858) 385-1595 [email protected] Front Cover: Collage of photos from the Edward H.
    [Show full text]