Monitoring of Organophosphorous Pesticide Resdues in Samples of Banana, Papaya, and Bell Pepper

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Monitoring of Organophosphorous Pesticide Resdues in Samples of Banana, Papaya, and Bell Pepper http://dx.doi.org/10.5935/0100-4042.20150005 Quim. Nova, Vol. 38, No. 2, 268-273, 2015 MONITORING OF ORGANOPHOSPHOROUS PESTICIDE RESDUES IN SAMPLES OF BANANA, PAPAYA, AND BELL PEPPER Mariana F. Lemos, Mayara F. Lemos, Henrique P. Pacheco and Rodrigo Scherer* Departamento de Farmácia, Universidade Vila Velha, Rua Comissário José Dantas de Melo, 21, 29102-770 Vitória – ES, Brasil Recebido em 11/07/2014; aceito em 16/10/2014; publicado na web em 16/01/2015 Nota Técnica The objective of this study was to monitor 11 organophosphorus pesticides in samples of papaya, bell pepper, and banana, commercialized in the metropolitan area of Vitória (ES, Brazil). The pesticides were determined by an optimized and validated method using high performance liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry (HPLC-MS/MS). All three samples exhibited a matrix effect for most of the pesticides, mainly with signal suppression, and therefore the calibration curves were produced in matrices. Linearity revealed coefficients of determination (r²) greater than 0.9895 for all pesticides and recovery results ranged from between 76% and 118% with standard deviation no greater than 16%. Precision showed relative standard deviation values lower than 19% and HorRat values lower than 0.7, considering all pesticides. Limits of quantification were less than 0.01 mg/kg for all pesticides. Regarding analysis of the samples (50 of each), none of the pesticides exceeded the maximum residue limit determined by Brazilian legislation. Keywords: QuEChERS; Capsicum annuum; Musa spp.; Carica papaya; pesticide analysis. INTRODUCTION Amid the classes of most toxic compounds and with greatest incidence in food in Brazil stand the insecticides, among which the With large, fertile lands and favorable weather for agriculture, organophosphorus compounds are prominent, accounting for more than Brazil is one of the world’s main producers and suppliers of food, 36% of the global market.12 With the rising of the organophosphorus, reaching third place in the global ranking of fruit production (41.5 which are less persistent in the environment, organochlorine pesticides, million tons) in 2010, with significant banana and papaya crops.1 though less hazardous, were substituted for being more resistant in During the same year, the country was one of the largest exporters the nature.13 In particular, organophosphorus are highly neurotoxic, of fruits and vegetables of Latin America, thus contributing to the presenting inhibitory function of cholinesterase, which controls the growth of Brazilian agribusiness, which was corroborated in 2012, nervous system, leading to an elevation in levels of the neurotransmitter when the export revenues raised to 910 million dollars.2 acetylcholine at nerve endings and causing neurobehavioral losses in Among several fruits and vegetables commercialized in Brazil, humans.14,15 Besides, pesticides are connected to other chronic health papaya, banana, and bell pepper achieved great prominence in the issues, such as cancer and adverse reproductive effects, dermatitis, country’s economy. Carica papaya, commonly known as papaya, respiratory problems, and can also be mutagenic and teratogenic.16,17 is produced in large scale in Brazil, which holds the second place In Brazil there are several monitoring programs focusing on in global production, only behind India.3 Moreover, the exports of evaluating food quality and on implementing controlling actions for this fruit accounted for 23 thousand tons, causing it to be the fifth pesticides residues, as an endeavor to minimize the exposure of the most exported product in January/2013.4,5 Similarly, banana (Musa population to these contaminants.18,19 The Program for Analysis of spp.) is one of the most produced and consumed fruits worldwide, Pesticides Residues in Food (PARA), coordinated by the National mainly in Brazil, which has a crop area of 71,253 hectares and ex- Sanitary Surveillance Agency (ANVISA), and the National Program for ports accounting for 82 thousand tons in 2013.4 It is a fruit known Residues and Contaminants Control (PNCRC), ran by the Department for its nutrients that contribute for elevated nutritional and energetic of Agriculture, Livestock, and Supply (MAPA), are responsible for levels.6 Bell pepper (Capsicuum annuum), a vitamin C source and the monitoring of pesticides residues and for instituting maximum rich in minerals, stands among the top ten vegetables consumed in residue limits (MRLs) in food. In recent years, pesticides residues were Brazil and around the world. In 2011 the Brazilian production was found in about 65% of analyzed samples, revealing bell pepper to be approximately 365.7 million tons and its sales accounted for near the vegetable with largest percentage of irregular samples, 90%, and 1.5 billion reais.7 papaya with 20% of unsatisfactory samples.20-22 It is relevant to keep in Fruits and vegetables are crucial for a healthy diet, due to the sight that, in the same year, the most abundant chemical group found in presence of significant amounts of nutrients and minerals. However, crops was the organophosphorus one, with 38% nonconformities.20-22 at the same time they may contain hazardous substances, such as In spite of the existence of the above-mentioned programs, they pesticides.8 Agricultural procedures with them still the most common only monitor small quantities of samples at each region, and that is way in order to achieve food production in adequate quantities, as why they do not present the thorough reality of the incidence of pes- they are an efficient tool against pests that can jeopardize production ticides in food. Therefore, the objective of this paper is to validate a and lead to food shortage.9 Between 2007 and 2012, the amount of method using sample preparation by QuEChERS method23 and high pesticides used in crops was 346.6 thousand tons, making Brazil the performance liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry world’s leader in pesticide commerce in 2010 and the second largest (HPLC-MS/MS) to monitor organophosphorus residues in samples market for pesticides in 2012, the first being the United States.10,11 of banana, papaya, and bell pepper from ten different market from at Vitória and Vila Velha cities (Espírito Santo, Brazil), during a *e-mail: [email protected] three-month period. Vol. 38, No. 2 Monitoring of organophosphorous pesticide resdues in samples of banana, papaya, and bell pepper 269 EXPERIMENTAL rate was constant at 0.8 mL min-1. The chromatography was coupled to a mass spectrometer with triple quadrupole (API3200, Applied Chemicals and reagents Biosystems), operating in positive (+5500 V) ionization mode. Ion source temperature was kept at 600 ºC and nitrogen was used as HPLC grade methanol and acetonitrile were purchased from collision gas. Data were collected by multiple reaction monitoring Tedia (Rio de Janeiro, Brazil) and J.T. Baker (Phillipsburg, USA), (MRM) and processed by the Analyst™ 5.0 software. respectively. Ultrapure water was obtained from a Direct-Q 3 UV system (Millipore, France). The analyzed organophosphorus stan- HPLC-MS/MS parameters optimization dards were bought from Absolute Standards in ampoules with 200 Due to its sensitivity and selectivity for trace analysis in com- µg mL-1 of each pesticide (azinphos-methyl, mevinphos, sulprofos, plex matrixes, liquid chromatography is a widespread technique to demeton-S-methyl sulfone, diazinon, etoprophos, fensulfothion, determine pesticides in large scale using MRM. As a way to obtain fenthion, coumaphos, dichlorvos, and tetrachlorvinphos). Formic maximum sensitivity to identify and quantify the target compounds, acid was purchased from Synth (Brazil), whereas acetic acid was the optimization of all mass spectrometer parameters was performed obtained from Cromoline (Brazil). For the QuEChERS method, for each analyte in a 0.8 µg mL-1 acetonitrile solution with 0.1% anhydrous magnesium sulfate, primary secondary amine (PSA), (v/v) acetic acid. Optimization of the parameters is displayed and sodium acetate (NaOAc), bought from VETEC (Brazil), Sigma in Table 1. Aldrich (USA), and Panreac (EU), respectively. Method validation Samples Method performance was evaluated according to the reference From September to November, 2013, 50 samples of Cavendish document DOQ-CGCRE-008, by the National Institute of Metrology, bananas, 50 of papaya, and 50 of green bell pepper were purchased Normalization, and Industrial Quality.25 Evaluated analytical param- from markets and open markets at the metropolitan area of Vitória (ES, eters were: selectivity (matrix effect), linearity, precision (repeat- Brazil). Samples were collected every fifteen days in polyethylene ability and intermediate precision), accuracy (recovery), and limits bags to store 1.0 kg of each sample (randomly chosen) and conducted of detection (LOD) and quantification (LOQ). The validation process immediately to the laboratory for the analyses. was developed using spiked samples and pesticide-free samples as blank (with previously confirmed absence of pesticides in samples Extraction of banana, papaya, and bell pepper). Samples of banana, papaya, and bell pepper were extracted Selectivity and matrix effect according to the QuEChERS method described by AOAC Official Selectivity assesses the studied substance in presence of other Method 2007.01.24 Each unit of the studied food, from its respective interfering compounds in the sample. Matrix effect is observed by sample, was cut in four pieces. Two were discarded and the remain- the increase or decrease of the detector response of an analyte in the ing ones were homogenized in a food processor. Part of the ground matrix extract when compared to the same substance analyzed in an sample was stored under refrigeration for retest. A 15 g portion was organic solvent. This evaluation was done by comparing detector inserted into a 50 mL Falcon tube and then 15 mL of acetonitrile responses (peak areas), analyzing a standard solution of pesticides with 1% acetic acid, 6 g of anhydrous MgSO4, and 1.5 g of NaOAc in solvent (acetonitrile 0.1% (v/v) acetic acid) and in extracts of each were added to the system.
Recommended publications
  • Development and Validation of a Method for the Simultaneous
    CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by UGD Academic Repository American Journal of Applie d Chemistry 2014; 2(4): 46-54 Published online August 10, 2014 (http://www.sciencepublishinggroup.com/j/ajac) doi: 10.11648/j.ajac.20140204.11 ISSN: 2330-8753 (Print); ISSN: 2330-8745 (Online) Development and validation of a method for the simultaneous determination of 20 organophosphorus pesticide residues in corn by accelerated solvent extraction and gas chromatography with nitrogen phosphorus detection Vesna Kostik *, Biljana Gjorgeska, Bistra Angelovska Medical Faculty, Department of Pharmacy, University “Goce Delchev”, Shtip, Republic of Macedonia Email address: [email protected] (V. Kostik), [email protected] (B. Gjorgeska), [email protected] (B. Angelovska) To cite this article: Vesna Kostik, Biljana Gjorgeska, Bistra Angelovska. Development and Validation of a Method for the Simultaneous Determination of 20 Organophosphorus Pesticide Residues in Corn by Accelerated Solvent Extraction and Gas Chromatography with Nitrogen Phosphorus Detection. American Journal of Applied Chemistry. Vol. 2, No. 4, 2014, pp. 46-54. doi: 10.11648/j.ajac.20140204.11 Abstract: The method for simultaneous determination of 20 organophosphorus pesticide residues in corn samples has been developed and validated. For the extraction of organophosporus pesticide residues from the samples, the accelerated solvent technique with the mixture of dichloromethane: acetone (1:1, V/V ) was used. Clean up was done using liquid – liquid extraction with n – hexane, followed by solid phase extraction on primary secondary amine adsorbent, and elution with the mixture of acetone: toluene (65:35). The determination of the pesticides was carried out by gas chromatography with nitrogen phosphorus detection.
    [Show full text]
  • Chemical Name Federal P Code CAS Registry Number Acutely
    Acutely / Extremely Hazardous Waste List Federal P CAS Registry Acutely / Extremely Chemical Name Code Number Hazardous 4,7-Methano-1H-indene, 1,4,5,6,7,8,8-heptachloro-3a,4,7,7a-tetrahydro- P059 76-44-8 Acutely Hazardous 6,9-Methano-2,4,3-benzodioxathiepin, 6,7,8,9,10,10- hexachloro-1,5,5a,6,9,9a-hexahydro-, 3-oxide P050 115-29-7 Acutely Hazardous Methanimidamide, N,N-dimethyl-N'-[2-methyl-4-[[(methylamino)carbonyl]oxy]phenyl]- P197 17702-57-7 Acutely Hazardous 1-(o-Chlorophenyl)thiourea P026 5344-82-1 Acutely Hazardous 1-(o-Chlorophenyl)thiourea 5344-82-1 Extremely Hazardous 1,1,1-Trichloro-2, -bis(p-methoxyphenyl)ethane Extremely Hazardous 1,1a,2,2,3,3a,4,5,5,5a,5b,6-Dodecachlorooctahydro-1,3,4-metheno-1H-cyclobuta (cd) pentalene, Dechlorane Extremely Hazardous 1,1a,3,3a,4,5,5,5a,5b,6-Decachloro--octahydro-1,2,4-metheno-2H-cyclobuta (cd) pentalen-2- one, chlorecone Extremely Hazardous 1,1-Dimethylhydrazine 57-14-7 Extremely Hazardous 1,2,3,4,10,10-Hexachloro-6,7-epoxy-1,4,4,4a,5,6,7,8,8a-octahydro-1,4-endo-endo-5,8- dimethanonaph-thalene Extremely Hazardous 1,2,3-Propanetriol, trinitrate P081 55-63-0 Acutely Hazardous 1,2,3-Propanetriol, trinitrate 55-63-0 Extremely Hazardous 1,2,4,5,6,7,8,8-Octachloro-4,7-methano-3a,4,7,7a-tetra- hydro- indane Extremely Hazardous 1,2-Benzenediol, 4-[1-hydroxy-2-(methylamino)ethyl]- 51-43-4 Extremely Hazardous 1,2-Benzenediol, 4-[1-hydroxy-2-(methylamino)ethyl]-, P042 51-43-4 Acutely Hazardous 1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane 96-12-8 Extremely Hazardous 1,2-Propylenimine P067 75-55-8 Acutely Hazardous 1,2-Propylenimine 75-55-8 Extremely Hazardous 1,3,4,5,6,7,8,8-Octachloro-1,3,3a,4,7,7a-hexahydro-4,7-methanoisobenzofuran Extremely Hazardous 1,3-Dithiolane-2-carboxaldehyde, 2,4-dimethyl-, O- [(methylamino)-carbonyl]oxime 26419-73-8 Extremely Hazardous 1,3-Dithiolane-2-carboxaldehyde, 2,4-dimethyl-, O- [(methylamino)-carbonyl]oxime.
    [Show full text]
  • Lifetime Organophosphorous Insecticide Use Among Private Pesticide Applicators in the Agricultural Health Study
    Journal of Exposure Science and Environmental Epidemiology (2012) 22, 584 -- 592 & 2012 Nature America, Inc. All rights reserved 1559-0631/12 www.nature.com/jes ORIGINAL ARTICLE Lifetime organophosphorous insecticide use among private pesticide applicators in the Agricultural Health Study Jane A. Hoppin1, Stuart Long2, David M. Umbach3, Jay H. Lubin4, Sarah E. Starks5, Fred Gerr5, Kent Thomas6, Cynthia J. Hines7, Scott Weichenthal8, Freya Kamel1, Stella Koutros9, Michael Alavanja9, Laura E. Beane Freeman9 and Dale P. Sandler1 Organophosphorous insecticides (OPs) are the most commonly used insecticides in US agriculture, but little information is available regarding specific OP use by individual farmers. We describe OP use for licensed private pesticide applicators from Iowa and North Carolina in the Agricultural Health Study (AHS) using lifetime pesticide use data from 701 randomly selected male participants collected at three time periods. Of 27 OPs studied, 20 were used by 41%. Overall, 95% had ever applied at least one OP. The median number of different OPs used was 4 (maximum ¼ 13). Malathion was the most commonly used OP (74%) followed by chlorpyrifos (54%). OP use declined over time. At the first interview (1993--1997), 68% of participants had applied OPs in the past year; by the last interview (2005--2007), only 42% had. Similarly, median annual application days of OPs declined from 13.5 to 6 days. Although OP use was common, the specific OPs used varied by state, time period, and individual. Much of the variability in OP use was associated with the choice of OP, rather than the frequency or duration of application.
    [Show full text]
  • Malathion Human Health and Ecological Risk Assessment Final Report
    SERA TR-052-02-02c Malathion Human Health and Ecological Risk Assessment Final Report Submitted to: Paul Mistretta, COR USDA/Forest Service, Southern Region 1720 Peachtree RD, NW Atlanta, Georgia 30309 USDA Forest Service Contract: AG-3187-C-06-0010 USDA Forest Order Number: AG-43ZP-D-06-0012 SERA Internal Task No. 52-02 Submitted by: Patrick R. Durkin Syracuse Environmental Research Associates, Inc. 5100 Highbridge St., 42C Fayetteville, New York 13066-0950 Fax: (315) 637-0445 E-Mail: [email protected] Home Page: www.sera-inc.com May 12, 2008 Table of Contents Table of Contents............................................................................................................................ ii List of Figures................................................................................................................................. v List of Tables ................................................................................................................................. vi List of Appendices ......................................................................................................................... vi List of Attachments........................................................................................................................ vi ACRONYMS, ABBREVIATIONS, AND SYMBOLS ............................................................... vii COMMON UNIT CONVERSIONS AND ABBREVIATIONS.................................................... x CONVERSION OF SCIENTIFIC NOTATION ..........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Biodetoxification of Coumaphos Insecticide Using Immobilized Escherichia Coli Expressing Organophosphorus Hydrolase Enzyme on Cell Surface
    Biotechnol. Bioprocess Eng. 2000, 5: 436-440 Biodetoxification of Coumaphos Insecticide Using Immobilized Escherichia coli Expressing Organophosphorus Hydrolase Enzyme on Cell Surface Ayman H. Mansee2, Wilfred Chen1, and Ashok Mulchandani1* 1 Department of Chemical and Environmental Engineering, University of California, Riverside, CA 92521, USA 2 On leave from Pesticide Chemistry Department, Faculty of Agriculture (El-Shatby), Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt Abstract Recently, we reported an improved technology for the degradation of organophos- phate nerve agents using whole cells of genetically engineered Escherichia coli that anchored and displayed the enzyme organophosphorus hydrolase on the cell surface. In this paper we report the immobilization of these cells on highly porous sintered glass beads and the subse- quent application of the immobilized cell in a continuous-flow packed bed bioreactor for the biodetoxification of a widely used insecticide, coumaphos. Keywords: OPH, pesticides, nerve agents, bioreactor, porous sintered glass beads INTRODUCTION (APHIS) operates a Tick Eradication Program designed to prevent the re-introduction of Cattle Fever into the Neurotoxic organophosphates (OPs), amongst the United States through ticks (Boophilus microplus and most toxic compound known, are widely used as pesti- Boophilus annulatus) on cattle imported from Mexico. cides, insecticides and chemical warfare agents. In the The primary tool used in the eradication program is a United States annually over 40 million kg of organo- series of dipping vats placed at the border crossing phosphate pesticides are consumed [1] while another 20 points. Cattle coming in from Mexico must be dipped million kg are produced for export [2]. Chlorpyrifos in vats before entering the US. Currently, coumaphos is (lorsban) and parathion are two of most popular pesti- the pesticide of choice for this application.
    [Show full text]
  • Table II. EPCRA Section 313 Chemical List for Reporting Year 2017 (Including Toxic Chemical Categories)
    Table II. EPCRA Section 313 Chemical List For Reporting Year 2017 (including Toxic Chemical Categories) Individually listed EPCRA Section 313 chemicals with CAS numbers are arranged alphabetically starting on page II-3. Following the alphabetical list, the EPCRA Section 313 chemicals are arranged in CAS number order. Covered chemical categories follow. Note: Chemicals may be added to or deleted from the list. The Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Call Center or the TRI-Listed Chemicals website will provide up-to-date information on the status of these changes. See section B.3.c of the instructions for more information on the de minimis % limits listed below. There are no de minimis levels for PBT chemicals since the de minimis exemption is not available for these chemicals (an asterisk appears where a de minimis limit would otherwise appear in Table II). However, for purposes of the supplier notification requirement only, such limits are provided in Appendix C. Chemical Qualifiers Certain EPCRA Section 313 chemicals listed in Table II have parenthetic “qualifiers.” These qualifiers indicate that these EPCRA Section 313 chemicals are subject to the section 313 reporting requirements if manufactured, processed, or otherwise used in a specific form or when a certain activity is performed. An EPCRA Section 313 chemical that is listed without a qualifier is subject to reporting in all forms in which it is manufactured, processed, and otherwise used. The following chemicals are reportable only if they are manufactured, processed, or otherwise used in the specific form(s) listed below: Chemical/ Chemical Category CAS Number Qualifier Aluminum (fume or dust) 7429-90-5 Only if it is a fume or dust form.
    [Show full text]
  • Amending Annex II to Directives 76/895/EEC and 86/362/EEC
    20 . 5 . 88 Official Journal of the European Communities No L 126/53 COUNCIL DIRECTIVE of 16 May 1988 amending Annex II to Directives 76/895/EEC and 86/362/EEC relating to the fixing of maximum levels for pesticide residues in and on fruit and vegetables and cereals respectively (88/298/EEC) THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES, Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community, Having regard to Council Directive 76/895/EEC of 23 November 1976 relating to the fixing of maximum levels for pesticide residues in and on fruit and vegetables 0), as last amended by Regulation (EEC) No 3768/85 (2), and in particular Article 5 thereof, Having regard to Council Directive 86/362/EEC of 24 July 1986 on the fixing of maximum levels for pesticide residues in and on cereals (3), and in particular Article 1 1 thereof, Having regard to the proposal from the Commission, Whereas, in the light of technical and scientific progress and of the requirements of public health and agriculture, it is necessary to amend the provisions, particularly the maximum levels, contained in Annex II to Directive 76/895/EEC relating to captafol, captan, chlorfenvinphos, dodine, fenitrothion, folpet, formothion and malathion ; Whereas, for the same reasons, it seems desirable to update Directive 76/895/EEC by adding provisions relating to further pesticides, residues of which may occur in and on fruit and vegetables, namely, ethion, ethylene dibromide, mevinphos, phosalone and 2, 4, 5-T, arid to update Directive 86/362/EEC by adding provisions relating to a further pesticide the residues of which may occur in cereals, namely, captafol, HAS ADOPTED THIS DIRECTIVE : Article 1 Annex II to Directive 76/895/EEC is hereby amended as follows : 1 .
    [Show full text]
  • SECRETARY HICKEL BANS USE of 16 PESTICIDES on ANY INTERIOR LANDS OR PROGRAMS -- June 18, 1970
    i DEPARTMENT of the INTERIOR news release OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY For Release Thursday, June 18, 1970 SECRETARYHICKEL BANS USE OF 16 PESTICIDES ON ANY INTERIOR LANDS OR PROGRAMS Secretary of the Interior Walter J. Hickel today announced a new policy flatly banning the use of 16 types of pesticides on any lands managed by the Department's bureaus and agencies, or in any program run by them. The Department administers approximately 70 percent of all federally owned lands. Included in this list of prohibited pesticides are such widely-known substances as DDT, Aldrin, 2, 4, 5,-T, Dieldrin, Endrin, Heptachlor, Lindane and Toxaphene. Also on the list of unconditionally banned items are Amitrol, arsenical compounds (inorganic), Azodrin, Bidrin, DDD (TDE), mercurial compounds, Strobane, and Thallium Sulfate. The Secretary pointed out that nearly all use of these pesticides has been banned on Interior Lands during recent years. The purpose of the new statement, he said, is to establish a policy for guidance of all Interior personnel. Another group of chemical pesticides, titled the Restricted List, are to be used only when non-chemical techniques have been considered and found inadequate, and when use can be limited to small-scale applications. Secretary Hickel emphasized that the use of any chemical pesticide by his agencies must be aimed at a specific pest problem, and involve minimum strength and minimum frequency of application. "We in the Interior Department-- the Nation's chief conservation agency have a special obligation to protect the environment for all the people,“’ Secretary Hickel said. "We are charged by law with responsibility for protecting interstate and coastal water quality, our fish and wildlife resources, the integrity of our national parks, public lands, and recreation areas," the Secretary continued.
    [Show full text]
  • Acutely / Extremely Hazardous Waste List
    Acutely / Extremely Hazardous Waste List Federal P CAS Registry Acutely / Extremely Chemical Name Code Number Hazardous 4,7-Methano-1H-indene, 1,4,5,6,7,8,8-heptachloro-3a,4,7,7a-tetrahydro- P059 76-44-8 Acutely Hazardous 6,9-Methano-2,4,3-benzodioxathiepin, 6,7,8,9,10,10- hexachloro-1,5,5a,6,9,9a-hexahydro-, 3-oxide P050 115-29-7 Acutely Hazardous Methanimidamide, N,N-dimethyl-N'-[2-methyl-4-[[(methylamino)carbonyl]oxy]phenyl]- P197 17702-57-7 Acutely Hazardous 1-(o-Chlorophenyl)thiourea P026 5344-82-1 Acutely Hazardous 1-(o-Chlorophenyl)thiourea 5344-82-1 Extemely Hazardous 1,1,1-Trichloro-2, -bis(p-methoxyphenyl)ethane Extemely Hazardous 1,1a,2,2,3,3a,4,5,5,5a,5b,6-Dodecachlorooctahydro-1,3,4-metheno-1H-cyclobuta (cd) pentalene, Dechlorane Extemely Hazardous 1,1a,3,3a,4,5,5,5a,5b,6-Decachloro--octahydro-1,2,4-metheno-2H-cyclobuta (cd) pentalen-2- one, chlorecone Extemely Hazardous 1,1-Dimethylhydrazine 57-14-7 Extemely Hazardous 1,2,3,4,10,10-Hexachloro-6,7-epoxy-1,4,4,4a,5,6,7,8,8a-octahydro-1,4-endo-endo-5,8- dimethanonaph-thalene Extemely Hazardous 1,2,3-Propanetriol, trinitrate P081 55-63-0 Acutely Hazardous 1,2,3-Propanetriol, trinitrate 55-63-0 Extemely Hazardous 1,2,4,5,6,7,8,8-Octachloro-4,7-methano-3a,4,7,7a-tetra- hydro- indane Extemely Hazardous 1,2-Benzenediol, 4-[1-hydroxy-2-(methylamino)ethyl]- 51-43-4 Extemely Hazardous 1,2-Benzenediol, 4-[1-hydroxy-2-(methylamino)ethyl]-, P042 51-43-4 Acutely Hazardous 1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane 96-12-8 Extemely Hazardous 1,2-Propylenimine P067 75-55-8 Acutely Hazardous 1,2-Propylenimine 75-55-8 Extemely Hazardous 1,3,4,5,6,7,8,8-Octachloro-1,3,3a,4,7,7a-hexahydro-4,7-methanoisobenzofuran Extemely Hazardous 1,3-Dithiolane-2-carboxaldehyde, 2,4-dimethyl-, O- [(methylamino)-carbonyl]oxime 26419-73-8 Extemely Hazardous 1,3-Dithiolane-2-carboxaldehyde, 2,4-dimethyl-, O- [(methylamino)-carbonyl]oxime.
    [Show full text]
  • Quantification of Organophosphorus Pesticides by Quechers and LC
    HPLC Application ID No.: 20020 Quantification of Organophosphorus Pesticides by QuEchERS and LC/MS/MS Column: Synergi™ 4 µm Fusion-RP 80 Å, LC Column 50 x 2 mm, Ea Dimensions: 50 x 2 mm ID Order No: 00B-4424-B0 Elution Type: Gradient Eluent A: Add 5mL of 1M ammonium formate to 1L Water Eluent B: Add 5mL of 1M ammonium formate to 1L Methanol Gradient Step No. Time (min) Pct A Pct B Profile: 1 -5 95 5 2 0 95 5 3 2 95 5 4 6 50 50 5 12 10 90 6 14 10 90 7 16 95 5 8 17 95 5 Flow Rate: 250 mL/min Col. Temp.: 25 °C Detection: Tandem Mass Spec (MS-MS) @ (ambient) Detector Info: <a target="_blank" href="https://sciex.com/products/mass-spectrometers?utm_campaign=2019%20application%20search&utm_source=phenomenex&utm_medium=referral">SCIEX</a> Analyst Note: SecurityGuard™ Guard Cartridge System extends column lifetime. - SecurityGuard Cartridges, Fusion-RP 4 x 2.0mm ID, 10/Pk Part No.: AJ0-7556 - Holder Part No.: KJ0-4282 ©2021 Phenomenex Inc. All rights reserved. For more information contact your Phenomenex Representative at [email protected] Phenomenex products are available worldwide. www.phenomenex.com [email protected] Page 1 of 2 HPLC Application ID No.: 20020 Quantification of Organophosphorus Pesticides by QuEchERS and LC/MS/MS ANALYTES: 1 Acephate (MRM: 184/142.8) 41 Diazinon (MRM: 305/169) 2 Acephate (MRM: 184/94.9) 42 Diazinon (MRM: 305/153) 3 Demeton-S-methyl sulfone (MRM: 263/169) 43 Fenthion (MRM: 278.9/169) 4 Demeton-S-methyl sulfone (MRM: 263/109) 44 Fenthion (MRM: 278.9/246.9) 5 Parathion-methyl Methyl parathion (MRM: 263.9/232.1)45
    [Show full text]
  • Recent Advances on Detection of Insecticides Using Optical Sensors
    sensors Review Recent Advances on Detection of Insecticides Using Optical Sensors Nurul Illya Muhamad Fauzi 1, Yap Wing Fen 1,2,*, Nur Alia Sheh Omar 1,2 and Hazwani Suhaila Hashim 2 1 Functional Devices Laboratory, Institute of Advanced Technology, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang 43400, Selangor, Malaysia; [email protected] (N.I.M.F.); [email protected] (N.A.S.O.) 2 Department of Physics, Faculty of Science, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang 43400, Selangor, Malaysia; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: Insecticides are enormously important to industry requirements and market demands in agriculture. Despite their usefulness, these insecticides can pose a dangerous risk to the safety of food, environment and all living things through various mechanisms of action. Concern about the environmental impact of repeated use of insecticides has prompted many researchers to develop rapid, economical, uncomplicated and user-friendly analytical method for the detection of insecticides. In this regards, optical sensors are considered as favorable methods for insecticides analysis because of their special features including rapid detection time, low cost, easy to use and high selectivity and sensitivity. In this review, current progresses of incorporation between recognition elements and optical sensors for insecticide detection are discussed and evaluated well, by categorizing it based on insecticide chemical classes, including the range of detection and limit of detection. Additionally, this review aims to provide powerful insights to researchers for the future development of optical sensors in the detection of insecticides. Citation: Fauzi, N.I.M.; Fen, Y.W.; Omar, N.A.S.; Hashim, H.S. Recent Keywords: insecticides; optical sensor; recognition element Advances on Detection of Insecticides Using Optical Sensors.
    [Show full text]
  • 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–09 Edition) Pt. 355, App. A
    Pt. 355, App. A 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–09 Edition) agreement between a State and a Threshold planning quantity means, Tribe, the SERC shall be the entity for a substance listed in Appendices A identified in the agreement. and B of this part, the quantity listed State means any State of the United in the column ‘‘threshold planning States, the District of Columbia, the quantity’’ for that substance. Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, Guam, [73 FR 65462, Nov. 3, 2008, as amended at 73 American Samoa, the United States FR 76960, Dec. 18, 2008] Virgin Islands, the Northern Mariana Islands, any other territory or posses- APPENDIX A TO PART 355—THE LIST OF sion over which the United States has EXTREMELY HAZARDOUS SUB- jurisdiction and Indian Country. STANCES AND THEIR THRESHOLD PLANNING QUANTITIES [Alphabetical Order] Reportable Threshold plan- CAS No. Chemical name Notes quantity * ning quantity (pounds) (pounds) 75–86–5 ................ Acetone Cyanohydrin ................................................. 10 ................ 1,000 1752–30–3 ............ Acetone Thiosemicarbazide ....................................... 1,000 ........... 1,000/10,000 107–02–8 .............. Acrolein ....................................................................... 1 .................. 500 79–06–1 ................ Acrylamide .................................................................. f ................... 5,000 1,000/10,000 107–13–1 .............. Acrylonitrile ................................................................. f ................... 100 10,000
    [Show full text]