New Russian Wheat Aphid Biotype Highlights Growing Resistance Concerns

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

New Russian Wheat Aphid Biotype Highlights Growing Resistance Concerns CROPS Russian Wheat Aphid New Russian wheat aphid biotype highlights growing resistance concerns Russian wheat aphid is showing increased cultivar and pesticide resistance, according to entomologist Dr Astrid Jankielsohn of the Agricultural Research Council. She has identified a new biotype, bringing to five the number seen in South Africa. Sabrina Dean reports. he Russian wheat aphid also found that aphid infestation ABOVE: the same active ingredients The Russian wheat (Diuraphis noxia) occurs affects the flour made from aphid produces a over long periods. worldwide where wheat infested wheat plants. variety of effects in “This means a very high T the host plant and is produced at commercial scale. The Food and Agriculture the subsequent likelihood of resistance South Africa currently has five Organization of the United product for which that renders this control biotypes affecting production, Nations regards RWA as a the plant is used. method useless.” An aphid infestation one of which was recorded serious threat to dryland wheat leads to reduced Only a limited selection of for the first time in 2018. It in many developing countries growth due to active ingredients are registered water imbalance was identified by Dr Astrid beset by sporadic drought. In and a reduction for RWA control in South Africa, Jankielsohn, an insect ecologist Europe, Africa, Asia, and North in biomass of the says Jankielsohn. These include at the Agricultural Research and South America, RWA has entire plant. acetamiprid, chlorpyrifos, PHOTOS: DR ASTRID Council’s Small Grains Institute caused crop losses of up to 80%. JANKIELSOHN demeton-S-methyl, dimethoate, in Bethlehem in the Free State. imidacloprid, parathion, The Russian wheat aphid (RWA) CONTROL MEASURES prothiofos and thiamethoxam. is native to south-western Asia According to Jankielsohn, Of these, chlorpyrifos is the and was introduced into many much effort is being invested most widely used in South European countries in the into developing control Africa and elsewhere. 20th century. It was first noted strategies. The two most “It’s systemic and provides as a pest in the Crimea in 1901, widely used of these are fast knock-down of aphids, and hence the common name. chemical control measures is the only active ingredient The aphid, which is up to and breeding for resistance, that can effectively control 2mm long, is light green in but both have drawbacks. RWA after the aphids enter colour and has a tiny spike at “Chemical control results rolled-up wheat leaves in later the rear above its tail, giving in environmental damage, colonisation stages,” she says. the impression of two tails. especially to insect groups Unfortunately, while The insect feeds on leaves, like pollinators, predators and chlorpyrifos is effective on a wide causing them to turn white decomposers. We need those range of insect pest species and is and curl up. The main damage, insects to be present in our used by farmers as a preventative however, is done by the saliva ecosystems,” she explains. application for grain aphids, it of this pest, which is toxic and Problems are also created also kills beneficial insects, such stunts growth. Research has by using chemicals with as pollinators and predators. 36 farmer’s weekly 1 MAY 2020 FAST FACTS • The Russian wheat aphid is a well- established invasive species in South Africa’s wheat production areas. Five biotypes have been recorded here. • Biotype 1 is the only biotype present in the Western Cape. • Dr Astrid Jankielsohn has noted resistance issues for both chemical and genetic control strategies. “The wide and continuous ABOVE LEFT: was first recorded in South “It’s the most virulent ‘The wide and use of one active ingredient continuous use Africa in 1978, and researchers RWA biotype recorded to has the potential of causing of one active have become concerned about date,” adds Jankielsohn. ingredient has resistance in the target insect the potential of increasing resistance among The pest can exist in and also weakening the predator causing resistance different biotypes, as well as the environments in which it has complex,” explains Jankielsohn. being developed in high virulence of new biotypes. established itself, as well as the target insect,’ “When resistance develops in says Dr Astrid adapt to changing environments the target insect, there’s nothing Jankielsohn. by developing new biotypes. to keep this insect under the BAREND WENTZEL THE EASTERN In recent years, Jankielsohn damage threshold in the absence ABOVE RIGHT: FREE STATE WAS has conducted surveys in of the predator complex.” Biological control several of South Africa’s major is key in the fight A DIFFERENT She advocates continual against Russian MATTER, WITH wheat production regions, monitoring of lands and only wheat aphid and has found that RWASA1 infestation. using chemicals when absolutely INFESTATIONS OF is the most widely distributed necessary to protect yield. FOUR BIOTYPES biotype. It occurs mainly in In addition, practices such the Western Cape, however, as crop rotation and inter- and and was the only biotype cover-cropping will limit the Until 2018, four RWA biotypes recorded in that region in 2018. availability of RWA host plants were known in South Africa. Although all known biotypes and prevent large populations “During 2018, there were were found in the Free State from surviving from one reports of wheat cultivars, in 2018, RWA was barely season to the next, she says. resistant to all four biotypes, present in the province’s which showed RWA damage western production regions. BREEDING FOR RESISTANCE symptoms in the field at Reitz and “For example, there was only Turning to the second control Danielsrus,” says Jankielsohn. one land in the Wesselsbron/ measure, breeding for resistance, “Screening of RWA samples Theunissen area that was infested Jankielsohn says that its collected in these areas confirmed by RWASA1,” notes Jankielsohn. drawback “is that insect pest that a new biotype, with The eastern Free State was a populations eventually adapt additional virulence to the Dnx different matter, with infestations to overcome resistance and resistant gene (see panel) in wheat, of all four biotypes, as well as render the strategy useless”. was occurring in these areas.” the first recording of the new She has been tracking RWA By then, the new biotype, biotype, mostly in the Reitz distribution, as well as RWASA5, had been recorded area, but also in Clocolan. investigating resistance problems, at eight different sites in Interestingly, the virulent for several years. The pest the eastern Free State. new RWASA5 topped the 1 MAY 2020 farmer’s weekly 37 CROPS Russian Wheat Aphid virulent than RWASA1. “The conclusion is that we are creating resistance,” says Jankielsohn. TACKLING THE PROBLEM Jankielsohn is convinced that the solution is to focus on sustainable practices that will address current challenges, as well as facilitate future control. She suggests, for example, that farmers change cropping practices by moving away from monoculture and following intercropping programmes. She also advocates decreasing host plants for RWA, as well as creating diversity within crops. “Don’t plant the same cultivar with the same genetic background in the same area every year, for example,” she says. She also calls on approaches that limit insecticide resistance. “Stop preventative spraying. Rather scout and only spray when necessary.” biotype complex in the Cape, for example, use solely ABOVE: The Russian wheat ‘AS THE NUMBER region, with a share of 15,4%, chemical control strategies. aphid is pale followed by RWASA3 (7,7%), “In the Western Cape, they green and up to OF BIOTYPES RWASA4 (5,8%), RWASA2 never rely on resistant wheat 2mm in length. HAVE INCREASED, (3,85%) and RWASA1 (1,92%). cultivars. Farmers grow SO RESISTANCE By 2019, Jankielsohn still noted susceptible plants and rely on low incidences of infestations chemicals to overcome RWA,” TO THE DISEASE in the western Free State she explains. This is why only HAS BEEN LOST’ areas, but saw that RWASA5 RWASA1 infestations have been populations had increased and recorded in that region. However, spread throughout the entire there are indications of growing Jankielsohn also advises eastern Free State region. insecticide resistance there. farmers to alternate pesticide According to her, different In contrast, farmers in the Free products with different active management practices are State tend to favour cultivar ingredients so as to prevent being employed in different resistance management. This, creating populations resistant areas, particularly those that however, has resulted in the to specific active ingredients. differ in terms of seasonal creation of the four additional Another solution Jankielsohn rainfall. Farmers in the Western biotypes, all deemed more champions is biological control. “One could increase suitable habitats for other insects Resistant genes such as predators. Sufficient numbers of predator insects According to Dr Astrid Jankielsohn, there are 11 genes could eventually maintain RWA associated with resistance to Russian wheat aphid (RWA), threshold populations,” she says. namely Dn1 to Dn9, Dnx and Dny. For a time after RWASA1 • Based on a presentation given was identified in South Africa in 1978, many of the Dn genes by Dr Astrid Jankielsohn at the could be used in breeding cultivars resistant to RWA. annual Combined Congress of “Initially, there were plenty of cultivars with resistance to RWASA1. crop production, soil, horticulture As the biotypes increased, resistance was lost, so that nowadays and weed sciences in January. there are only limited Dn genes able to overcome RWA,” she says. • Email Dr Astrid Jankielsohn at [email protected]. ▪FW 38 farmer’s weekly 1 MAY 2020.
Recommended publications
  • Russian Wheat Aphid
    Fact sheet Russian wheat aphid What is Russian wheat aphid? Russian wheat aphid (Diuraphis noxia) is a soft bodied insect that feeds mainly on wheat and barley, but can attack most cereal crops. If this pest enters Australia, it has been estimated that it could cause significant damage to crops, resulting in up to 75% yield losses. è è What does it look like? The aphid is small (up to 1.8 mm long), has a ‘needle-like’ mouthpart, and is light green in colour. The body is elongated compared with other cereal Bugwood.org Frank Peairs, Colorado State University, Wingless adult Russian wheat aphid, showing lack of aphid species. Adults can be winged or wing-less. siphuncles (‘exhaust pipes’ – circled) and presence of a Juveniles (nymphs) look similar to adults but lack ‘double tail’ end (cauda – arrowheads) wings. Characteristic features include dual structures at the rear (cauda) of the insect giving it a ‘double-tail’ appearance (see arrowheads in image top right) and lack visible siphuncles (‘exhaust pipes’ – circles in images on right) that are characteristic for most aphids. What can it be confused with? If it were present, Russian wheat aphid could be found with other cereal aphids on crops. The elongated body shape and lack of ‘exhaust SARDI pipes’ distinguish this aphid from common cereal Adult Oat aphid, with siphuncles (‘exhaust pipe’) structures species (compare top image to middle image). (circled) and no double tail What should I look for? Whilst feeding, the aphid injects salivary toxins into the plant tissue causing the leaves to roll up and white, purple or yellowish streaks to form.
    [Show full text]
  • Areawide Pest Management of Cereal Aphids in Dryland Wheat Systems of the Great Plains, USA
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Panhandle Research and Extension Center Agricultural Research Division of IANR 2008 Areawide Pest Management of Cereal Aphids in Dryland Wheat Systems of the Great Plains, USA Kristopher Giles Oklahoma State University, [email protected] Gary L. Hein University of Nebraska-Lincoln, [email protected] Frank Peairs Colorado State University - Fort Collins Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/panhandleresext Part of the Agriculture Commons Giles, Kristopher; Hein, Gary L.; and Peairs, Frank, "Areawide Pest Management of Cereal Aphids in Dryland Wheat Systems of the Great Plains, USA" (2008). Panhandle Research and Extension Center. 33. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/panhandleresext/33 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Agricultural Research Division of IANR at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Panhandle Research and Extension Center by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. 19 Areawide Pest Management of Cereal Aphids in Dryland Wheat Systems of the Great Plains, USA KRISTOPHER GILES, 1 GARY HEIN2 AND FRANK PEAIRS3 1Department of Entomology and Plant Pathology, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, Oklahoma, USA 2Department of Entomology, University of Nebraska Panhandle R&E Center, Scottsbluff, Nebraska, USA 3Department of Bioagricultural Sciences and Pest Management, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA Introduction: Description of the Problem and Need for an Areawide Pest Management Approach In the Great Plains of the USA from Wyoming to Texas, dryland winter wheat either is regularly grown continuously or is followed by a year of fallow in semi-arid locales (Royer and Krenzer, 2000).
    [Show full text]
  • Hippodamia Variegata (Goeze) (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) Detected in Michigan Soybean Fields
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by ValpoScholar The Great Lakes Entomologist Volume 38 Numbers 3 & 4 - Fall/Winter 2005 Numbers 3 & Article 8 4 - Fall/Winter 2005 October 2005 Hippodamia Variegata (Goeze) (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) Detected in Michigan Soybean Fields Mary M. Gardiner Michigan State University Gary L. Parsons Michigan State University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.valpo.edu/tgle Part of the Entomology Commons Recommended Citation Gardiner, Mary M. and Parsons, Gary L. 2005. "Hippodamia Variegata (Goeze) (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) Detected in Michigan Soybean Fields," The Great Lakes Entomologist, vol 38 (2) Available at: https://scholar.valpo.edu/tgle/vol38/iss2/8 This Peer-Review Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Department of Biology at ValpoScholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in The Great Lakes Entomologist by an authorized administrator of ValpoScholar. For more information, please contact a ValpoScholar staff member at [email protected]. Gardiner and Parsons: <i>Hippodamia Variegata</i> (Goeze) (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) D 164 THE GREAT LAKES ENTOMOLOGIST Vol. 38, Nos. 3 & 4 HIPPODAMIA VARIEGATA (GOEZE) (COLEOPTERA: COCCINELLIDAE) DETECTED IN MICHIGAN SOYBEAN FIELDS Mary M. Gardiner1 and Gary L. Parsons2 ABSTRACT Since its initial detection near Montreal, Canada in 1984, the variegated lady beetle Hippodamia variegata (Goeze) (Coleoptera:Coccinellidae) has spread throughout the northeastern United States. In 2005, this immigrant Old World species was detected in Michigan for the first time. Twenty-nine adults were found in soybean fields in 4 counties: Ingham, Gratiot, Kalamazoo, and Saginaw.
    [Show full text]
  • Cereal Aphids G
    G1284 (Revised August 2005) Cereal Aphids G. L. Hein, Extension Entomologist, J. A. Kalisch, Extension Technologist, and J. Thomas, Research Coordinator to living young. A female may produce two to three young Identification and general discussion of the cereal per day under warm conditions, and females may mature in aphid species most commonly found in Nebraska small 7-10 days. This tremendous reproduction potential can result grains, corn, sorghum and millet. in rapid aphid population buildup. Males of some species are seldom if ever seen. Cereal aphids can be a serious threat to several Nebraska Both winged and wingless aphids may be present in the crops. Aphid feeding may cause direct damage to the plant or field. Winged forms are produced when the quality of the host result in transmission of plant diseases. Aphids also may cause plant declines, such as at maturity. Other factors, including damage by injecting toxic salivary secretions during feeding. temperature, photoperiod or seasonality, and population density In Nebraska the most serious cereal aphid problems result also may be involved. The ability of aphids to use flight for from Russian wheat aphid infestations on wheat and barley dispersal is an important factor that contributes to the status and greenbug infestations on sorghum and to a lesser extent of these insects as pests. on wheat. Growers must monitor their crops for these aphids. Greenbug, Schizaphis graminum (Rondani) Several other cereal aphid species also may be present, but they seldom cause significant damage. Accurate aphid identi- The greenbug is a light green aphid with a dark green fication is necessary to make the best management decisions.
    [Show full text]
  • Airborne Multispectral Remote Sensing for Russian Wheat Aphid
    AIRBORNE MULTI-SPECTRAL REMOTE SENSING FOR RUSSIAN WHEAT APHID INFESTATIONS Norm Elliott1, Mustafa Mirik2, Zhiming Yang3, Tom Dvorak4, Mahesh Rao3, Jerry Michels2, Vasile Catana2, Mpho Phoofolo2, Kris Giles2, and Tom Royer2 1USDA-ARS-PSRL 1301 N. Western Rd., Stillwater, OK 74074 [email protected] 2Texas Agricultural Experiment Station 2301 Experiment Station Rd., Bushland, TX 79012 [email protected], [email protected] 3Oklahoma State University Stillwater, OK 74078 [email protected], [email protected] [email protected], [email protected] [email protected], [email protected] 4University of Iowa Iowa City, IA 52243 [email protected] ABSTRACT The Russian wheat aphid (RWA) is a severe pest of wheat in the High Plains region of the United States. Remote sensing could be effective for detecting RWA infestations for pest management decision-making. We evaluated an airborne multi-spectral remote sensing system for its ability to differentiate varying levels of injury caused by RWA infestation in winter wheat fields. Two study fields were located in southeastern Colorado in spring 2004, and two fields were located in far western Oklahoma in spring 2005. In each field, RWA density and plant damage were determined for 20-24 3x3 m plots with varying levels of RWA damage. Prior to sampling plots, multi-spectral imagery was obtained using an SSTCRIS® multi-spectral imaging system mounted NADIR in a Cessna 172 aircraft. The multi-spectral data were used to compare with RWA infestation level for each plot. Correlations between vegetation indices and the proportion of RWA damaged wheat tillers per plot were negative for all vegetation indices calculated.
    [Show full text]
  • The Russian Wheat Aphid in Utah
    Extension Entomology Department of Biology, Logan, UT 84322 Utah State University Extension Fact Sheet No. 80 February 1993 THE RUSSIAN WHEAT APHID IN UTAH Introduction Since arriving in Utah in 1987, the Russian wheat aphid, Diuraphis noxia (Kurdjumov), has spread to all grain growing areas of the state. It is very unpredictable in that at times it becomes an economic pest and at other times it is just present. In some areas it has caused losses in wheat and barley of up to 50 percent or more. It can be a problem in fall or spring planted grains. Biology Russian wheat aphids infest wheat, barley, and triticale, as well as several wild and cultivated grasses. Broadleaf plants such as alfalfa, clover, potatoes, and sunflowers are not hosts. Volunteer grain plays a key role in the life cycle of this pest by providing a food source in the interval between grain harvest and the emergence of fall-seeded crops. Many species of grasses act as reservoir hosts during the late-summer dry season; however, grasses such as barnyard grass and foxtail grass that grow on irrigation ditch banks and other wet waste areas are poor hosts. Most wild desert grasses are normally dormant and unsuitable for aphids during this period. In some cases, winged forms may feed on corn during heavy flights, but no colonization occurs. In the summer, all Russian wheat aphids are females that do not lay eggs but give birth to live young at a rate of four to five per day for up to four weeks. The new young females can mature in as little as 7-10 days.
    [Show full text]
  • Aphid Vectors and Grass Hosts of Barley Yellow Dwarf Virus and Cereal Yellow Dwarf Virus in Alabama and Western Florida by Buyun
    AphidVectorsandGrassHostsofBarleyYellowDwarfVirusandCerealYellow DwarfVirusinAlabamaandWesternFlorida by BuyungAsmaraRatnaHadi AdissertationsubmittedtotheGraduateFacultyof AuburnUniversity inpartialfulfillmentofthe requirementsfortheDegreeof DoctorofPhilosophy Auburn,Alabama December18,2009 Keywords:barleyyellowdwarf,cerealyellowdwarf,aphids,virusvectors,virushosts, Rhopalosiphumpadi , Rhopalosiphumrufiabdominale Copyright2009byBuyungAsmaraRatnaHadi Approvedby KathyFlanders,Co-Chair,AssociateProfessorofEntomologyandPlantPathology KiraBowen,Co-Chair,ProfessorofEntomologyandPlantPathology JohnMurphy,ProfessorofEntomologyandPlantPathology Abstract Yellow Dwarf (YD) is a major disease problem of wheat in Alabama and is estimated to cause yield loss of 21-42 bushels per acre. The disease is caused by a complex of luteoviruses comprising two species and several strains, including Barley yellowdwarfvirus (BYDV),strainPAV,and Cerealyellowdwarfvirus (CYDV),strain RPV. The viruses are exclusively transmitted by aphids. Suction trap data collected between1996and1999inNorthAlabamarecordedthe presence of several species of aphidsthatareknowntobeB/CYDVvectors. Aphidsweresurveyedinthebeginningofplantingseasonsinseveralwheatplots throughout Alabama and western Florida for four consecutive years. Collected aphids wereidentifiedandbioassayedfortheirB/CYDV-infectivity.Thissurveyprogramwas designedtoidentifytheaphid(Hemiptera:Aphididae)speciesthatserveasfallvectorsof B/CYDVintowheatplanting.From2005to2008,birdcherry-oataphid,
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Suction Trapping of Selected Small Grain Aphids in Colorado, 1988-1998 Robert W. Hammon1, Terri L. Randolph2, J. Scott Armstro
    Suction Trapping of Selected Small Grain Aphids in Colorado, 1988-1998 Robert W. Hammon1, Terri L. Randolph2, J. Scott Armstrong3, Cynthia B. Walker4, Jeffrey B. Rudolph2, Michael D. Koch5, Wendy L. Meyer6, and Frank B. Peairs2 1 Fruita Research Center, 1910 L Rd., Fruita, CO 81521 2 Bioagricultural Sciences and Pest Management, Colorado State University, Fort Collins CO 80523 3Plant and Soil Science, Texas Tech University, Lubbock TX 79409 4Colorado State University, 1001 S. Main, Lamar CO 81052 5 USDA Central Great Plains Research Station, P.O. Box 400, Akron CO 80720 6TREC, 18905 SW 280th St., Homestead FL 33031 1 Aphids are serious pests of small grains climactic conditions. Eggs are much less worldwide because of direct feeding damage and vulnerable to climactic extremes than living the ability to transmit plant pathogens. In aphids, so Russian wheat aphid populations are Colorado, the major cereal aphid pests are the more stable from year to year in areas where Russian wheat aphid, Diuraphis noxia there is no sexual reproduction. Males have never (Mordvilko), greenbug, Schizaphis graminum been found in North America so all reproduction (Rodani), and bird-cherry oat aphid, is assumed to be asexual. Russian wheat aphids Rhopalosiphum padi (L.). The Russian wheat spend the winter as living aphids, feeding on host aphid, introduced into the United States in 1986, plants when climactic conditions permit causes chlorotic leaf streaking, leaf stunting and (Hammon and Peairs, 1992). When winters are rolling, and trapped and distorted heads. Losses very cold or there is extended snow cover, to Russian wheat aphid have exceeded $112 Russian wheat aphid populations decrease or million in damage in Colorado (F.B.
    [Show full text]
  • Russian Wheat Aphid: Natural Enemies, Resistant Wheat Offer Potential Control Rz D
    Russian wheat aphid: natural enemies, resistant wheat offer potential control rz D. Gonzalez a Charles G. Summers o Calvin 0. Qualset u> 2 f Adult Russian wheat aphid. wears. Coordinated research to de- and social costs or the concerns associated velop economically and environ- with COmba~gRwA tati ions with insecticides. At present, insecticides are management the only RWA control tactic available to strategies for this pest is in California farmers. Continued use of these progress. agents will destroy native natural enemies, accelerate dev~opm~tof insecticide re- In March 1986, Russian wheat aphid sistance in RWA and other insect pests, (RWA),Diuruphis noxiu (Mordvilko),was and upset se~ndarypests. The results, first reported present in the United States, short-term, are induced pest outbreaks. causing crop losses in small grains in The results, long-term, are cont~ation Texas. Since then, it has spread, infesting of soil and watert wildlife losses, and gen- View of aphid from above showing characteris- small grains in Oklahoma, Kansas, Ne- eral en~o~ent~degradation. Economi- tic short antennae, double tail, and very short braska and South Dakota and moving cdy, too, the extensive acreage planted cornicles (small tubelike projections on each west to California, Oregon and Washing- with small gains, depressed markets and side of the aphid). ton. Crop losses in 1988 were an estimated decreased prices make unilateral chemical $130 million, 2.4 times greater than in protection a poor option. 1987. Losses since 1986 have exceeded ~u~he~ore,~~ea~edsmall grains $500 million. nonnally host native natural enemiesf pro- Russian wheat aphid is a small, pale viding natural control of potential p~ma~ green insect, often covered with a white and second^ pests in their crops and in powdery coating of wax.
    [Show full text]
  • (Aegilops Cylindrica Host.) in Winter Wheat
    Utah State University DigitalCommons@USU All Graduate Theses and Dissertations Graduate Studies 5-1996 An Integration of Tillage and Herbicides to Control Jointed Goatgrass (Aegilops Cylindrica Host.) in Winter Wheat Troy M. Price Utah State University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/etd Part of the Plant Sciences Commons Recommended Citation Price, Troy M., "An Integration of Tillage and Herbicides to Control Jointed Goatgrass (Aegilops Cylindrica Host.) in Winter Wheat" (1996). All Graduate Theses and Dissertations. 4602. https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/etd/4602 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate Studies at DigitalCommons@USU. It has been accepted for inclusion in All Graduate Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@USU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. AN INTEGRATION OF TILLAGE AND HERBICIDES TO CONTROL JOINTED GOATGRASS (AEGILOPS CYLINDRICA HOST.) IN WINTER WHEAT by Troy M . Price f. thesis submitted in partial fu!fi!lrr.er:t of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE in Plant Science UTAH STATE UNIVERSITY Logan, Utah 1996 ii ABSTRACT An Integration of Tillage and Herbicides to Control Jointed Goatgrass (Aegilops cylindrica Host.) in Winter Wheat by Troy M. Price, Master of Science Utah State University, 1996 Major Professor: Dr. John 0. Evans Department: Plants, Soils and Biometeorology An integrated management approach for jointed goatgrass control was investigated at two farms in northern Utah using three tillage regimes and three herbicides. The tillage regimes included no tillage, conservation tillage, and conventional tillage. Each regime was composed of different tillage practices common in the Intermountain West.
    [Show full text]
  • Effects of Plant Viruses on Vectors and Non-Vector Herbivores in Three
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Doctoral Dissertations Graduate School March 2019 Effects of Plant Viruses on Vectors and Non-vector Herbivores in Three Different Pathosystems Sunil Paudel Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations Part of the Entomology Commons Recommended Citation Paudel, Sunil, "Effects of Plant Viruses on Vectors and Non-vector Herbivores in Three Different Pathosystems" (2019). LSU Doctoral Dissertations. 4870. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations/4870 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized graduate school editor of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please [email protected]. EFFECTS OF PLANT VIRUSES ON VECTORS AND NON-VECTOR HERBIVORES IN THREE DIFFERENT PATHOSYSTEMS A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in The Department of Entomology by Sunil Paudel B. S., Tribhuvan University, 2008 M.S., University of Idaho, 2013 May 2019 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to express my sincere gratitude to my major advisor, Dr. Jeffrey A. Davis for his continuous support throughout my graduate studies, for his patience, encouragement, and guidance that helped me to grow as a researcher and a critical thinker. I am also thankful to my dissertation committee members, Drs. Michael J. Stout, Fangneng Huang, Jeffrey W. Hoy, and Dean’s representative Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Field Resistance in Bread Wheat to Russian Wheat Aphid, Diuraphis Noxia Under Flood Irrigation
    Ethiop. J. Agric. Sci. 28(2) 85-98 (2018) Field Resistance in Bread Wheat to Russian Wheat Aphid, Diuraphis noxia Under Flood Irrigation Tebkew Damte and Geteneh Mitiku Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural Research, Debre Zeit Center, P. O. Box 32, Debre Zeit, Ethiopia አህፅሮት የሩሲያ ክሽክሽ (Diuraphis noxia) በዓሇም ሊይ በሰፊው የተሰራጨ ተባይ ሲሆን የስንዴ ምርትን እስከ 93 በመቶ ሉያወድም ይችሊል፡፡ እንዲሁም ይህ ክሽክሽ ቅዉም ሰባሪዎች ስሊሇው ክሽክሹን የሚቋቋሙ ዝርያዎች የሚያገሇግለት ሇተወሰነ አካባቢ ብቻ ነው፡፡ ይህም በመሆኑ ከኢትዮጵያ ውጭ ባለ ስንዴ አብቃይ አገሮች ክሽክሹን የሚቋቋሙ 49 ብዝሀ-ዘሮችን በማስገባት ዯብረ ዘይት ሊይ ሇሁሇት ዓመት (2007 እና 2008 ዓም) መስኖ እና የተፈጥሮ ወረራ በመጠቀም ተፈትሿል፡፡ ሙከራው የተካሄዯው 7 በ 7 በሆነ የሊቲስ ንድፍ ሊይ ብዝሀ-ዘሮችን በመዝራት ነው፡፡ ሙከራ ከተዯረገባቸው 49 ብዝሀ-ዘሮች መካከል ከሩሲያ ክሽክሽ ወረራ ነፃ የሆነ ብዝሀዘር ባይኖርም በክሽክሽ አህዛብ ብዛት ግን ሰፊ ተሇያይነት ነበር፡፡ በሁሇቱም ዓመት ከፍተኛ ቁጥር ባሇው ክሽክሽ የተወረሩና ከፍተኛ ጥቃት የዯረሰባቸው ብዝሀ-ዘሮች ትንሽ ቁጥር ባሇው ክሽክሽ የተወረሩ እና ከፍተኛ ቅውሞሽ ያሳዩ ብዝሀ-ዘሮች ነበሩ፡፡ ቀሪዎች ብዝሀ-ዘሮች ግን መካከሇኛ የቅውሞሽ ዯረጃ ነበራቸው፡፡ ስሇሆነም የሩሲያ ክሽክሽ አህዛብ ዕድገት በተሇያዩ ብዝሀ-ዘሮች የተሇያየ ነበር፡፡ በተጨማሪም በተወረሩ ቀዘባዎች (መቶኛ) እና በአንድ ቀዘባ ሊይ የነበረው የክሽክሽ ብዛት መካከል ቀጥተኛ ግንኙነት አልነበረም፡፡ Abstract The Russian wheat aphid (RWA) (Diuraphis noxia) is cosmopolitan pest and yield losses of up to 93% have been reported in different wheat growing countries. It also has a high degree of biotypic diversity that necessitates the development and utilization of location specific resistant wheat varieties. Thus, 49 wheat genotypes known to be resistant to RWA in other countries were evaluated using natural infestation in 7x7 Simple Lattice for two seasons under flood irrigation at Debre Zeit, Ethiopia.
    [Show full text]