DOCSLIB.ORG

Effects of Plant Viruses on Vectors and Non-Vector Herbivores in Three

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Effects of Plant Viruses on Vectors and Non-Vector Herbivores in Three Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Doctoral Dissertations Graduate School March 2019 Effects of Plant Viruses on Vectors and Non-vector Herbivores in Three Different Pathosystems Sunil Paudel Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations Part of the Entomology Commons Recommended Citation Paudel, Sunil, "Effects of Plant Viruses on Vectors and Non-vector Herbivores in Three Different Pathosystems" (2019). LSU Doctoral Dissertations. 4870. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations/4870 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized graduate school editor of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please [email protected]. EFFECTS OF PLANT VIRUSES ON VECTORS AND NON-VECTOR HERBIVORES IN THREE DIFFERENT PATHOSYSTEMS A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in The Department of Entomology by Sunil Paudel B. S., Tribhuvan University, 2008 M.S., University of Idaho, 2013 May 2019 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to express my sincere gratitude to my major advisor, Dr. Jeffrey A. Davis for his continuous support throughout my graduate studies, for his patience, encouragement, and guidance that helped me to grow as a researcher and a critical thinker. I am also thankful to my dissertation committee members, Drs. Michael J. Stout, Fangneng Huang, Jeffrey W. Hoy, and Dean’s representative Dr. John C. Larkin for serving on my committee and providing me valuable suggestions and guidance for improvement. My sincere thanks go to Art Richter, Mark Murray, Monique de Souza, John Dryburgh, Colin Bonser, Scot Lee and all the members of soybean entomology laboratory for their help in carrying out my research projects and their friendship throughout this journey. I am always grateful to the unconditional support of my family members for this academic accomplishment. I owe special thanks to my wife, Shilpa Ghimire, for her love, support, understanding and patience throughout this journey. Last but not the least, my sincere thanks go to the Department of Entomology, all the faculty members, and all my friends for their friendship and company during my graduate studies here at Louisiana State University. ii TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS........................................................................................................ ii ABSTRACT ...............................................................................................................................v CHAPTER 1: GENERAL INTRODUCTION .............................................................................1 1.1. References ........................................................................................................................4 CHAPTER 2: LITERATURE REVIEW .....................................................................................7 2.1. Biology and life cycle of aphids ........................................................................................7 2.2. Aphid transmitted viruses, their biology, and management .............................................. 10 2.3. Why aphids are efficient virus vectors? ........................................................................... 16 2.4. Effects of plant viruses on behavior and performance of vectors and non-vectors ............ 17 2.5. Use of electrical penetration graph for study of vector feeding behavior .......................... 20 2.6. Study systems ................................................................................................................. 22 2.7. References ...................................................................................................................... 33 CHAPTER 3: THE FEEDING BEHAVIOR AND VECTOR POTENTIAL OF MELANAPHIS SACCHARI IN TRANSMITTING SORGHUM MOSAIC VIRUS TO SORGHUM .................... 50 3.1. Introduction .................................................................................................................... 50 3.2. Materials and Methods .................................................................................................... 58 3.3. Results ............................................................................................................................ 63 3.4. Discussion ...................................................................................................................... 66 3.5. References ...................................................................................................................... 70 CHAPTER 4: THE PREFERENCE BEHAVIOR AND LIFE HISTORY TRAITS OF MELANAPHIS SACCHARI ON SORGHUM MOSAIC VIRUS-INFECTED AND NON- INFECTED SORGHUM ........................................................................................................... 76 4.1. Introduction .................................................................................................................... 76 4.2. Materials and Methods .................................................................................................... 80 4.3. Results ............................................................................................................................ 85 4.4. Discussion ...................................................................................................................... 90 4.5. References ...................................................................................................................... 94 iii CHAPTER 5: IMPACTS OF CUCUMBER MOSAIC VIRUS AND SUNN-HEMP MOSAIC VIRUS ON FEEDING, GROWTH AND OVIPOSITION PREFERENCE OF TWO NON- VECTOR HERBIVORES ......................................................................................................... 97 5.1. Introduction .................................................................................................................... 97 5.2. Materials and Methods .................................................................................................... 99 5.3. Results .......................................................................................................................... 103 5.4. Discussion .................................................................................................................... 104 5.5. References .................................................................................................................... 106 CHAPTER 6: EFFECTS OF BELL PEPPER ENDORNAVIRUS ON MYZUS PERSICAE HOST PREFERENCE AND POPULATION DYNAMICS ............................................................... 112 6.1. Introduction .................................................................................................................. 112 6.2. Materials and Methods .................................................................................................. 114 6.3. Results .......................................................................................................................... 119 6.4. Discussion .................................................................................................................... 122 6.5. References .................................................................................................................... 124 CHAPTER 7: SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION ................................................................. 127 VITA ...................................................................................................................................... 131 iv ABSTRACT Plant viruses are an important component of agro-ecosystems and the knowledge of impacts they can cause on their hosts, and on different vectors and non-vector herbivores associated with the hosts, is very crucial in devising sound management strategies for virus disease and vector control in the landscape. The interactions between these components, however, are difficult to predict and vary according to the system under investigation. In order to understand some of these interrelationships, different sets of experiments were carried out in three different pathosystems to look at the impacts of plant viruses on vector and non-vector herbivores. Firstly, in Sorghum mosaic virus (SrMV)-sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.) pathosystem, we found that Melanaphis sacchari (Zehntner) was attracted to virus infected sorghum but the population was negatively affected upon feeding on virus infected sorghum. Moreover, M. sacchari unlike Myzus persicae (Sulzer), failed to transmit SrMV, and we state based on our results that M. sacchari is a non-vector of SrMV. In Cucumber mosaic virus (CMV) and Sunn-hemp mosaic virus (ShMV) infected cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp), oviposition by adult Chrysodeixis includens (Walker) and Spodoptera frugiperda (Smith) was negatively affected whereas S. frugiperda larva benefitted upon feeding on CMV-infected host tissue. In our study with Bell pepper endornavirus (BPEV) in bell pepper (Capsicum annuum L.), we observed that M. persicae preferred virus-free leaves and performed poorly on virus infected leaf tissues. The mixed results we obtained on the impacts of plant viruses in different systems suggest that it is difficult to draw
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Russian Wheat Aphid
    Fact sheet Russian wheat aphid What is Russian wheat aphid? Russian wheat aphid (Diuraphis noxia) is a soft bodied insect that feeds mainly on wheat and barley, but can attack most cereal crops. If this pest enters Australia, it has been estimated that it could cause significant damage to crops, resulting in up to 75% yield losses. è è What does it look like? The aphid is small (up to 1.8 mm long), has a ‘needle-like’ mouthpart, and is light green in colour. The body is elongated compared with other cereal Bugwood.org Frank Peairs, Colorado State University, Wingless adult Russian wheat aphid, showing lack of aphid species. Adults can be winged or wing-less. siphuncles (‘exhaust pipes’ – circled) and presence of a Juveniles (nymphs) look similar to adults but lack ‘double tail’ end (cauda – arrowheads) wings. Characteristic features include dual structures at the rear (cauda) of the insect giving it a ‘double-tail’ appearance (see arrowheads in image top right) and lack visible siphuncles (‘exhaust pipes’ – circles in images on right) that are characteristic for most aphids. What can it be confused with? If it were present, Russian wheat aphid could be found with other cereal aphids on crops. The elongated body shape and lack of ‘exhaust SARDI pipes’ distinguish this aphid from common cereal Adult Oat aphid, with siphuncles (‘exhaust pipe’) structures species (compare top image to middle image). (circled) and no double tail What should I look for? Whilst feeding, the aphid injects salivary toxins into the plant tissue causing the leaves to roll up and white, purple or yellowish streaks to form.
    [Show full text]
  • Areawide Pest Management of Cereal Aphids in Dryland Wheat Systems of the Great Plains, USA
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Panhandle Research and Extension Center Agricultural Research Division of IANR 2008 Areawide Pest Management of Cereal Aphids in Dryland Wheat Systems of the Great Plains, USA Kristopher Giles Oklahoma State University, [email protected] Gary L. Hein University of Nebraska-Lincoln, [email protected] Frank Peairs Colorado State University - Fort Collins Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/panhandleresext Part of the Agriculture Commons Giles, Kristopher; Hein, Gary L.; and Peairs, Frank, "Areawide Pest Management of Cereal Aphids in Dryland Wheat Systems of the Great Plains, USA" (2008). Panhandle Research and Extension Center. 33. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/panhandleresext/33 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Agricultural Research Division of IANR at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Panhandle Research and Extension Center by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. 19 Areawide Pest Management of Cereal Aphids in Dryland Wheat Systems of the Great Plains, USA KRISTOPHER GILES, 1 GARY HEIN2 AND FRANK PEAIRS3 1Department of Entomology and Plant Pathology, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, Oklahoma, USA 2Department of Entomology, University of Nebraska Panhandle R&E Center, Scottsbluff, Nebraska, USA 3Department of Bioagricultural Sciences and Pest Management, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA Introduction: Description of the Problem and Need for an Areawide Pest Management Approach In the Great Plains of the USA from Wyoming to Texas, dryland winter wheat either is regularly grown continuously or is followed by a year of fallow in semi-arid locales (Royer and Krenzer, 2000).
    [Show full text]
  • Insecticides - Development of Safer and More Effective Technologies
    INSECTICIDES - DEVELOPMENT OF SAFER AND MORE EFFECTIVE TECHNOLOGIES Edited by Stanislav Trdan Insecticides - Development of Safer and More Effective Technologies http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/3356 Edited by Stanislav Trdan Contributors Mahdi Banaee, Philip Koehler, Alexa Alexander, Francisco Sánchez-Bayo, Juliana Cristina Dos Santos, Ronald Zanetti Bonetti Filho, Denilson Ferrreira De Oliveira, Giovanna Gajo, Dejane Santos Alves, Stuart Reitz, Yulin Gao, Zhongren Lei, Christopher Fettig, Donald Grosman, A. Steven Munson, Nabil El-Wakeil, Nawal Gaafar, Ahmed Ahmed Sallam, Christa Volkmar, Elias Papadopoulos, Mauro Prato, Giuliana Giribaldi, Manuela Polimeni, Žiga Laznik, Stanislav Trdan, Shehata E. M. Shalaby, Gehan Abdou, Andreia Almeida, Francisco Amaral Villela, João Carlos Nunes, Geri Eduardo Meneghello, Adilson Jauer, Moacir Rossi Forim, Bruno Perlatti, Patrícia Luísa Bergo, Maria Fátima Da Silva, João Fernandes, Christian Nansen, Solange Maria De França, Mariana Breda, César Badji, José Vargas Oliveira, Gleberson Guillen Piccinin, Alan Augusto Donel, Alessandro Braccini, Gabriel Loli Bazo, Keila Regina Hossa Regina Hossa, Fernanda Brunetta Godinho Brunetta Godinho, Lilian Gomes De Moraes Dan, Maria Lourdes Aldana Madrid, Maria Isabel Silveira, Fabiola-Gabriela Zuno-Floriano, Guillermo Rodríguez-Olibarría, Patrick Kareru, Zachaeus Kipkorir Rotich, Esther Wamaitha Maina, Taema Imo Published by InTech Janeza Trdine 9, 51000 Rijeka, Croatia Copyright © 2013 InTech All chapters are Open Access distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license, which allows users to download, copy and build upon published articles even for commercial purposes, as long as the author and publisher are properly credited, which ensures maximum dissemination and a wider impact of our publications. After this work has been published by InTech, authors have the right to republish it, in whole or part, in any publication of which they are the author, and to make other personal use of the work.
    [Show full text]
  • Melanaphis Sacchari), in Grain Sorghum
    DEVELOPMENT OF A RESEARCH-BASED, USER- FRIENDLY, RAPID SCOUTING PROCEDURE FOR THE INVASIVE SUGARCANE APHID (MELANAPHIS SACCHARI), IN GRAIN SORGHUM By JESSICA CARRIE LINDENMAYER Bachelor of Science in Soil and Crop Sciences Bachelor of Science in Horticulture Colorado State University Fort Collins, Colorado 2013 Master of Science in Entomology and Plant Pathology Oklahoma State University Stillwater, Oklahoma 2015 Submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate College of the Oklahoma State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY May, 2019 DEVELOPMENT OF A RESEARCH-BASED, USER- FRIENDLY, RAPID SCOUTING PROCEDURE FOR THE INVASIVE SUGARCANE APHID (MELANAPHIS SACCHARI), IN GRAIN SORGHUM Dissertation Approved: Tom A. Royer Dissertation Adviser Kristopher L. Giles Norman C. Elliott Mark E. Payton ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank my amazing committee and all my friends and family for their endless support during my graduate career. I would like to say a special thank you to my husband Brad for supporting me in every way one possibly can, I couldn’t have pursued this dream without you. I’d also like to thank my first child, due in a month. The thought of getting to be your mama pushed me to finish strong so you would be proud of me. Lastly, I want to thank my step father Jasper H. Davis III for showing me how to have a warrior’s spirit and to never give up on something, or someone you love. Your love, spirit, and motivational words will always be heard in my heart even while you’re gone.
    [Show full text]
  • The Mechanism by Which Aphids Adhere to Smooth Surfaces
    J. exp. Biol. 152, 243-253 (1990) 243 Printed in Great Britain © The Company of Biologists Limited 1990 THE MECHANISM BY WHICH APHIDS ADHERE TO SMOOTH SURFACES BY A. F. G. DIXON, P. C. CROGHAN AND R. P. GOWING School of Biological Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, NR4 7TJ Accepted 30 April 1990 Summary 1. The adhesive force acting between the adhesive organs and substratum for a number of aphid species has been studied. In the case of Aphis fabae, the force per foot is about 10/iN. This is much the same on both glass (amphiphilic) and silanized glass (hydrophobic) surfaces. The adhesive force is about 20 times greater than the gravitational force tending to detach each foot of an inverted aphid. 2. The mechanism of adhesion was considered. Direct van der Waals forces and viscous force were shown to be trivial and electrostatic force and muscular force were shown to be improbable. An adhesive force resulting from surface tension at an air-fluid interface was shown to be adequate and likely. 3. Evidence was collected that the working fluid of the adhesive organ has the properties of a dilute aqueous solution of a surfactant. There is a considerable reserve of fluid, presumably in the cuticle of the adhesive organ. Introduction The mechanism by which certain insects can walk on smooth vertical and even inverted surfaces has long interested entomologists and recently there have been several studies on this subject (Stork, 1980; Wigglesworth, 1987; Lees and Hardie, 1988). The elegant study of Lees and Hardie (1988) on the feet of the vetch aphid Megoura viciae Buckt.
    [Show full text]
  • University of Florida Thesis Or Dissertation Formatting Template
    EFFECTS OF INTERCROPPING AND BIOLOGICAL INSECTICIDES ON SUGARCANE APHID (HEMIPTERA: APHIDIDAE) INFESTATIONS ON SORGHUM, AND IDENTIFICATION OF NATURAL ENEMIES AND ALTERNATE HOSTS IN HAITI By WILFRID CALVIN A THESIS PRESENTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF SCIENCE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA 2019 © 2019 Wilfrid Calvin To Jehovah, Issa, Calissa, Amelise, and Mercilhome ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I thank God for always holding my hand through every step in my life. I am also grateful to my family for their unfailing support throughout my life. I would like to thank my lovely wife for her undying assistance and constant encouragement during my study period. Special thanks to my adorable daughter who endured with love such a long period of time away from daddy to make this achievement possible. I thank Dr. Julien Beuzelin, my committee chair, for all his guidance and support during my master’s study. My committee members, Drs. Oscar Liburd and Marc Branham, have also provided useful advice and support for which I am so thankful. I am also thankful to Mr. Ludger Jean Simon for his support toward the success of the experiments conducted in Haiti. I would like to thank Dr. Elijah Talamas for his help identifying insect samples from Haiti. I thank Donna Larsen for providing technical assistance in all experiments conducted at the UF/IFAS Everglades Research and Education Center (EREC) and for all the help to make my stay in Belle Glade successful. I am also thankful to Erik Roldán for all his help during my master’s program.
    [Show full text]
  • Advances in Understanding the Ecology of Invasive Crop Insect
    Invasive insect pests and IPM Invasive insect pests and IPM Advances in understanding the ecology of invasive crop insect pests and their impact on IPM Robert Venette, USDA Forest Service, USA; and Amy Morey, University of Minnesota, USA 1 Introduction 2 Ecology of invasive species 3 Invasive species management strategies 4 Relationship of invasive species management to IPM 5 Future trends 6 Acknowledgements 7 Where to look for further information 8 References 1 Introduction Invasive species remain one of the greatest threats to the productivity and sustainability of agriculture, forests, prairies and wetlands (Lovett et al., 2016; Paini et al., 2016). By definition these species are alien (i.e. non-native) to some ecosystems in which they now occur. In their adventive geographic range, they lack co-evolutionary history with the native flora and fauna. As a result, hosts are bereft of specific resistance mechanisms, and no specialized co-evolved natural enemies occur to regulate pest population growth. Alien species become invasive when they cause, or are likely to cause, economic, ecological or social (including human health) harms. Indeed, most insect pests of agriculture and forestry are non-native and efforts to control them dominate applied entomology (Liebhold and Griffin, 2016). The most recent update to the National Road Map for Integrated Pest Management (IPM) places a special emphasis on invasive species (OPMP, 2018). Previous experiences with insect invasions helped to shape modern awareness of the challenges posed by invasive species. For example, invasion by the North American grape phylloxera, Viteus vitifoliae, devastated European vineyards and inspired European nations to enact some of the first quarantine regulations globally to prevent the introduction of insect pests.
    [Show full text]
  • A Contribution to the Aphid Fauna of Greece
    Bulletin of Insectology 60 (1): 31-38, 2007 ISSN 1721-8861 A contribution to the aphid fauna of Greece 1,5 2 1,6 3 John A. TSITSIPIS , Nikos I. KATIS , John T. MARGARITOPOULOS , Dionyssios P. LYKOURESSIS , 4 1,7 1 3 Apostolos D. AVGELIS , Ioanna GARGALIANOU , Kostas D. ZARPAS , Dionyssios Ch. PERDIKIS , 2 Aristides PAPAPANAYOTOU 1Laboratory of Entomology and Agricultural Zoology, Department of Agriculture Crop Production and Rural Environment, University of Thessaly, Nea Ionia, Magnesia, Greece 2Laboratory of Plant Pathology, Department of Agriculture, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece 3Laboratory of Agricultural Zoology and Entomology, Agricultural University of Athens, Greece 4Plant Virology Laboratory, Plant Protection Institute of Heraklion, National Agricultural Research Foundation (N.AG.RE.F.), Heraklion, Crete, Greece 5Present address: Amfikleia, Fthiotida, Greece 6Present address: Institute of Technology and Management of Agricultural Ecosystems, Center for Research and Technology, Technology Park of Thessaly, Volos, Magnesia, Greece 7Present address: Department of Biology-Biotechnology, University of Thessaly, Larissa, Greece Abstract In the present study a list of the aphid species recorded in Greece is provided. The list includes records before 1992, which have been published in previous papers, as well as data from an almost ten-year survey using Rothamsted suction traps and Moericke traps. The recorded aphidofauna consisted of 301 species. The family Aphididae is represented by 13 subfamilies and 120 genera (300 species), while only one genus (1 species) belongs to Phylloxeridae. The aphid fauna is dominated by the subfamily Aphidi- nae (57.1 and 68.4 % of the total number of genera and species, respectively), especially the tribe Macrosiphini, and to a lesser extent the subfamily Eriosomatinae (12.6 and 8.3 % of the total number of genera and species, respectively).
    [Show full text]
  • Determining the Role of Seed and Soil in the Transmission Of
    DETERMINING THE ROLE OF SEED AND SOIL IN THE TRANSMISSION OF VIRUSES CAUSING MAIZE LETHAL NECROSIS DISEASE By GATUNZI KITIRA FELIX (B.Sc. in Rural Development) A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of requirements for the award of degree of Master of Science in Plant Pathology Department of Plant Science and Crop Protection Faculty of Agriculture University of Nairobi 2018 DECLARATION This thesis is a presentation of my original research work and has not been presented for a degree in any other University. Felix Gatunzi Kitira Date…................................................ This thesis has been submitted with our approval as University supervisors: Dr. Douglas Watuku Miano Department of Plant Science and Crop Protection University of Nairobi Signature ….…………………………. Date……………………………….. Prof. Daniel Mukunya Department of Plant Science and Crop Protection Signature ……………………………. Date……………………………….. Dr. Suresh Lingadahalli Mahabaleswara Global Maize Program (GMP), International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center CIMMYT Signature.…………………………………… Date……………………………… i PLAGIARISM DECLARATION I understand what plagiarism is and I am aware of the University’s policy. In this regard, I declare that this MSc Thesis is my original work. Where other people’s work or my own work has been used, it has properly been acknowledged and referenced in accordance with the University of Nairobi’s requirement. I have not allowed, and shall allow anyone to copy my work with the intention of passing it off as his or her own work. I understand that any false claim in respect of this work shall result in disciplinary action, in accordance with University Plagiarism Policy. Signature.................................................................Date.......................................................... ii DEDICATION To the almighty God for imparting me with his grace along this journey.
    [Show full text]
  • Molecular Identification and Characterization of Two Rubber Dandelion
    Molecular Identification and Characterization of Two Rubber Dandelion Amalgaviruses Archives of Virology – Annotated Sequence Record Humberto Debat1*, Zinan Luo, Brian J. Iaffaldano, Xiaofeng Zhuang, Katrina Cornish 2 1 Instituto de Patología Vegetal, Centro de Investigaciones Agropecuarias, Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (IPAVE-CIAP-INTA), 11 de setiembre 4755, Córdoba, Argentina, X5020ICA. 2 Department of Horticulture and Crop Science, The Ohio State University, Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center, Williams Hall, 1680 Madison Avenue, Wooster, OH 44691. * Corresponding author: Humberto Debat, [email protected], Tel: +54 9 351 4973636, Fax: +54 9 351 4974330 Abstract The Amalgaviridae family is composed of persistent viruses that share the genome architecture of Totiviridae and gene evolutionary resemblance to Partitiviridae. A single Amalgavirus genus has been assigned to this family, harboring only four recognized species, corresponding to plant infecting viruses with dsRNA monopartite genomes of ca. 3.4 kb. Here, we present the genomic identification and characterization of two novel Amalgavirus detected in Rubber dandelion (Taraxacum kok-saghyz). The sequenced isolates presented a 3,409 and 3,413 nt long genome, harbouring two partially overlapping ORFs encoding a putative coat protein and an RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRP). Multiple independent RNAseq data suggest that the identified viruses have a differential distribution and low relative RNA levels in infected plants. Virus presence was not associated with any apparent symptoms on the plant host. We propose the name rubber dandelion latent virus 1 & 2 to the detected Amalgavirus. Annotated sequence record Natural rubber is an essential material to the manufacture of 50,000 different rubber and latex products.
    [Show full text]
  • A Virus of Hyperthermophilic Archaea with a Unique Architecture Among DNA Viruses
    A virus of hyperthermophilic archaea with a unique architecture among DNA viruses Elena Ilka Rensena,1, Tomohiro Mochizukia,b,1, Emmanuelle Quemina, Stefan Schoutenc, Mart Krupovica,2, and David Prangishvilia,2 aDepartment of Microbiology, Institut Pasteur, 75015 Paris, France; bEarth-Life Science Institute, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Tokyo 152-8550, Japan; and cDepartment of Marine Organic Biogeochemistry, Royal Netherlands Institute for Sea Research, 1790 AB Den Burg, The Netherlands Edited by James L. Van Etten, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE, and approved January 19, 2016 (received for review September 23, 2015) Viruses package their genetic material in diverse ways. Most known shell consisting of two protein layers and an external envelope. strategies include encapsulation of nucleic acids into spherical or Our results provide new insights into the diversity of architec- filamentous virions with icosahedral or helical symmetry, respec- tural solutions used by filamentous viruses. tively. Filamentous viruses with dsDNA genomes are currently as- sociated exclusively with Archaea. Here, we describe a filamentous Results hyperthermophilic archaeal virus, Pyrobaculum filamentous virus 1 Virus and Host Isolation. From the environmental sample collected (PFV1), with a type of virion organization not previously observed at the Pozzuoli Solfatara, Italy, enrichment cultures were estab- in DNA viruses. The PFV1 virion, 400 ± 20 × 32 ± 3 nm, contains an lished in conditions known to favor the growth of aerobic mem- envelope and an inner core consisting of two structural units: a rod- bers of the archaeal genus Pyrobaculum (14). The virus-like particles shaped helical nucleocapsid formed of two 14-kDa major virion pro- (VLPs) were detected in the enrichment culture by transmission teins and a nucleocapsid-encompassing protein sheath composed electron microscopy (TEM).
    [Show full text]
  • Temperature Dependent Development of Sugarcane Aphids
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Faculty Publications: Department of Entomology Entomology, Department of 2019 Temperature Dependent Development of Sugarcane Aphids Melanaphis Sacchari, (Hemiptera: Aphididae) on Three Different Host Plants with Estimates of the Lower and Upper Threshold for Fecundity Michael A. De Souza J. Scott Armstrong W. Wyatt Hoback Phillip G. Mulder Sulochana Paudyal See next page for additional authors Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/entomologyfacpub Part of the Entomology Commons This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Entomology, Department of at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Publications: Department of Entomology by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Authors Michael A. De Souza, J. Scott Armstrong, W. Wyatt Hoback, Phillip G. Mulder, Sulochana Paudyal, John E. Foster, Mark E. Payton, and Josephine Akosa Current Trends in Entomology and Zoological Studies Souza MA, et al. Curr Trends Entomol Zool Stds 2: 1011. Research Article DOI:10.29011/CTEZS-1011.001011 Temperature Dependent Development of Sugarcane Aphids Melana- phis Sacchari, (Hemiptera: Aphididae) on Three Different Host Plants with Estimates of the Lower and Upper Threshold for Fecundity Misael A De Souza1, J Scott Armstrong2*, W Wyatt Hoback1, Phillip G Mulder1, Sulochana Paudyal1 , John E Foster3, Mark E Payton4, Josephine Akosa5 1Department
    [Show full text]