DOCSLIB.ORG

City of Syracuse Parking Study

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
City of Syracuse Parking Study University Hill Park & Ride Feasibility Study Final Report University Hill Park & Ride Feasibility Study Prepared by C&S Engineers for Syracuse Metropolitan Transportation Council Final Report February 2010 This report was funded in part through grant[s] from the Federal Highway Administration and Federal Transit Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation. The views and opinions of the authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the U. S. Department of Transportation. For further information contact: Nell Donaldson, Project Manager Syracuse Metropolitan Transportation Council 126 N. Salina St., 100 Clinton Square, Suite 100, Syracuse, NY 13202 PHONE: (315) 422-5716 FAX: (315) 422-7753 www.smtcmpo.org University Hill Park & Ride Feasibility Study Final Report THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK University Hill Park & Ride Feasibility Study Final Report UNIVERSITY HILL PARK & RIDE FEASIBILITY STUDY TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Introduction ..............................................................................................................1 A. Purpose of Study ..........................................................................................1 B. Area to be Served .........................................................................................2 C. Definition of Area of Interest .......................................................................2 D. Study Advisory Committee........................................................................11 E. Institutional Focus Group ..........................................................................11 F. Institutional Interviews ..............................................................................11 2. Background ............................................................................................................13 A. Park and Ride Case Studies .......................................................................13 B. Previous Studies .........................................................................................15 C. Data Collection ..........................................................................................17 i. Population ...................................................................................17 ii. Parking ........................................................................................18 iii. Shuttle Services ...........................................................................22 3. Programming Needs and Parameters .....................................................................25 A. Methodology/Resources ............................................................................25 i. SAC and IFG ..............................................................................25 ii. Relevant Studies..........................................................................25 iii. Institution Interviews .................................................................25 iv. Transportation Opinion Survey ..................................................25 v. Facility Case Studies ...................................................................26 a. Wrapped Garage...................................................................26 b. Mixed Use Parking Structure ...............................................28 B. Site Needs ..................................................................................................30 i. Size ..............................................................................................30 ii. Location ......................................................................................30 C. Facility Needs ............................................................................................32 i. .. Users and Availability.................................................................32 ii. Facility Type ...............................................................................33 iii. Facility Size – Parking Demand .................................................34 iv. Supportive Land Use...................................................................35 D. Shuttle Needs .............................................................................................37 i. Schedule ......................................................................................37 ii. Tracking Technology ..................................................................37 iii. Vehicle ........................................................................................37 iv. Shuttle Stops ...............................................................................38 v. System Flexibility .......................................................................38 E. Summary of Program Needs and Parameters ............................................39 i. Site ..............................................................................................39 ii. Facility ........................................................................................39 iii. Shuttle .........................................................................................39 i University Hill Park & Ride Feasibility Study Final Report UNIVERSITY HILL PARK & RIDE FEASIBILITY STUDY TABLE OF CONTENTS cont. 4. Alternative Analysis..............................................................................................41 A. Phase 1 Evaluation .....................................................................................41 i. Methodology and Evaluation Criteria .........................................41 ii. Suburban Sites ............................................................................41 iii. Local/Regional Sites ...................................................................47 iv. Phase 2 Evaluation Sites .............................................................51 B. Phase 2 Evaluation .....................................................................................57 i. Methodology and Evaluation Criteria .........................................57 ii. General Assumptions ..................................................................59 iii. Option 1 – Fayetteville/DeWitt (P-8) .........................................69 a. Site .....................................................................................69 b. Facility ...............................................................................70 c. Shuttle ................................................................................71 d. General Summary of Advantages and Disadvantages .......73 iv. Option 2 – Liverpool (P-4 and P-6) ...............................................74 a. Seneca Mall Site P-4 ..........................................................74 b. Liverpool Wegmans Site P-6 .............................................75 c. Facility ...............................................................................77 d. Shuttle ...............................................................................78 e. General Summary of Advantages and Disadvantages .......81 v. Option 3 – Camillus (P-16) ............................................................82 a. Site ....................................................................................82 b. Facility83 c. Shuttle ................................................................................84 d. General Summary of Advantages and Disadvantages .......86 vi. Option 4 – Kennedy Square Vicinity Sites (A1, A2 and A3) ........87 a. Kennedy Square Vicinity Site A1 ......................................87 i. Site ..............................................................................87 ii. Facility .........................................................................89 b. Kennedy Square Vicinity Site A2 ......................................92 i. Site ..............................................................................92 ii. Facility .........................................................................93 c. Kennedy Square Vicinity Site A3 ......................................94 i. Site ..............................................................................94 ii. Facility .........................................................................96 d. Shuttle ................................................................................98 e. General Summary of Advantages and Disadvantages .....100 ii University Hill Park & Ride Feasibility Study Final Report UNIVERSITY HILL PARK & RIDE FEASIBILITY STUDY TABLE OF CONTENTS cont. vii. Option 5 – Syracuse Housing Authority Sites (C1 and C2) ........101 a. Syracuse Housing Authority Site C1 ...............................101 i. Site ............................................................................101 ii. Facility .......................................................................103 b. Syracuse Housing Authority Site C2 ...............................104 i. Site ............................................................................104 ii. Facility .......................................................................106 c. Shuttle ..............................................................................108 d. General Summary of Advantages and Disadvantages .....110 viii. Option 6 – Teall Avenue (K) .......................................................111 a. Site ..................................................................................111 b. Facility .............................................................................112 c. Alternative
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Welcome to Syracuse
    WELCOME TO SYRACUSE As you begin your new journey in Syracuse, we have included some information that you may find helpful as you adjust to your new home. Inside you will find information about our city to jumpstart your Syracuse experience. CLIMATE & WEATHER SNAPSHOT OF SYRACUSE! Experience four distinct The city of Syracuse is located in Onondaga County seasons in the geographic center of New York State. The Average Temperatures: Onondaga, Syracuse Metropolitan Area is made up of Cayuga, Madison, Onondaga, and Oswego counties. Area Code: 315 Population in 2021: City of Syracuse: 141,491 Onondaga County: 458,286 Median Age: Syracuse: 30.6 September: Onondaga County: 39 64 degrees New York State: 38.2 United States: 38.2 The Heart of New York From Syracuse, it’s easy to venture Montreal Ottawa out to explore the state, as well CANADA Burlington January: as major eastern cities. VERMONT Toronto NEW YORK 24 degrees NEW Nearby Distance Rochester HAMPSHIRE Buffalo SYRACUSE Boston Major Cities by Miles Albany Binghamton MASSACHUSETTS Hartford Albany, NY 140 miles RHODE CONNECTICUT ISLAND Baltimore, MD 300 miles Cleveland PENNSYLVANIA OHIO Newark New York City Binghamton, NY 75 miles Pittsburgh Philadelphia Boston, MA 300 miles NEW JERSEY Buffalo, NY 150 miles WEST Baltimore VIRGINIA Chicago, IL 665 miles Washington, DC DELAWARE Cleveland, OH 330 miles VIRGINIA MARYLAND Montreal, QC 250 miles New York, NY 260 miles Niagara Falls, NY 165 miles Philadelphia, PA 255 miles #54 Best National Pittsburgh, PA 345 miles Universities Rochester, NY 85 miles ~ US News & World Report Toronto, ON 250 miles July: Washington, DC 350 miles 72 degrees TRANSPORTATION There are many options to navigate the city, even if you don’t have a car.
    [Show full text]
  • Onondaga County Legislature
    ROSTER 2020 - 2021 ONONDAGA COUNTY LEGISLATURE Including a quick reference guide for: COUNTY DEPARTMENTS, CITY, TOWN, VILLAGE AND SCHOOL OFFICIALS DAVID H. KNAPP, Chairman JAMIE McNAMARA, Clerk 401 Montgomery Street Court House, Room 407 Syracuse, New York 13202 www.ongov.net/Legislature ROSTER 2020 - 2021 ONONDAGA COUNTY LEGISLATURE Including a quick reference guide for: COUNTY DEPARTMENTS, CITY, TOWN, VILLAGE AND SCHOOL OFFICIALS DAVID H. KNAPP, Chairman JAMIE McNAMARA, Clerk 401 Montgomery Street Court House, Room 407 Syracuse, New York 13202 www.ongov.net/Legislature ONONDAGA COUNTY LEGISLATURE 2020-2021 DIST. NAME ADDRESS PHONE EMAIL PARTY 1st Brian F. May* 1395 River Bend Drive, Baldwinsville, 13027 315-447-4914 [email protected] R 2nd James J. Rowley 4255 Mayfair Circle, Liverpool, 13090 315-622-0059 [email protected] R 3rd Tim Burtis 9444 Hawkeye Drive, Brewerton, 13029 315-396-3300 [email protected] R 4th Judith A. Tassone 4855 Thornwood Drive, Liverpool, 13088 315-457-5458 [email protected] R 5th Debra J. Cody 107 Circle Road, N. Syracuse, 13212 518-421-0022 [email protected] R 6th Julie Abbott-Kenan 7 Tallcot Lane, Skaneateles, 13152 315-685-9361 [email protected] R 7th Mary T. Kuhn 108 Orvilton Drive, DeWitt, 13214 315-476-6509 [email protected] D 8th Christopher J. Ryan 205 Maple Road, Syracuse, 13219 315-484-9171 [email protected] D 9th Peggy Chase 440 Ridgewood Drive, Syracuse, 13206 315-437-2035 [email protected] D 10th Kevin A. Holmquist 123 Summerhaven Dr. S., E. Syracuse, 13057 315-637-8364 [email protected] R 11th John D.
    [Show full text]
  • Syracuse Transit System Analysis
    Syracuse Transit System Analysis Prepared For: NYSDOT CENTRO Syracuse Metropolitan Transportation Council January 2014 The I‐81 Challenge Syracuse Transit System Analysis This report has been prepared for the New York State Department of Transportation by: Stantec Consulting Services, Inc. Prudent Engineering In coordination with: Central New York Regional Transportation Authority (CENTRO) Syracuse Metropolitan Transportation Council The I‐81 Challenge Executive Summary of the Syracuse Transit System Analysis I. Introduction The Syracuse Transit System Analysis (STSA) presents a summary of the methodology, evaluation, and recommendations that were developed for the transit system in the Syracuse metropolitan area. The recommendations included in this document will provide a public transit system plan that can be used as a basis for CENTRO to pursue state and federal funding sources for transit improvements. The study has been conducted with funding from the New York State Department of Transportation (NYSDOT) through The I‐81 Challenge study, with coordination from CENTRO, the Syracuse Metropolitan Transportation Council (SMTC), and through public outreach via The I‐81 Challenge public participation plan and Study Advisory Committee (SAC). The recommendations included in this system analysis are based on a combination of technical analyses (alternatives evaluation, regional modeling), public survey of current transit riders and non‐riders/former riders, meetings with key community representatives, and The I‐81 Challenge public workshops. The STSA is intended to serve as a long‐range vision that is consistent with the overall vision of the I‐81 corridor being developed as part of The I‐81 Challenge. The STSA will present a series of short‐term, mid‐term, and long‐ term recommendations detailing how the Syracuse metropolitan area’s transit system could be structured to meet identified needs in a cost‐effective manner.
    [Show full text]
  • Position Profile Associate Mcdevitt Chair in Religious Philosophy & Co
    Position Profile Associate McDevitt Chair in Religious Philosophy & Co-Director of the Manresa Program September 2018 This search is managed in partnership with Summit Search Solutions, Inc. THE INSTITUTION Sitting on a beautiful 160-acre tree-lined campus and located just 10 minutes from downtown Syracuse, in the heart of the state of New York, lies Le Moyne College, an independent college established by the Jesuits in 1946. Its mission is to provide students with a values-based, comprehensive academic program designed to foster intellectual excellence and preparation for a life of leadership and service. Under dynamic presidential leadership, Le Moyne College is evolving into a nationally acclaimed college of liberal arts and sciences that draws students from across the U.S. and abroad. Le Moyne is the second youngest of the 28 Jesuit colleges and universities in the United States and the first to open as a co-ed institution. Le Moyne offers more than 700 courses leading to Bachelor of Arts or Bachelor of Science degrees in more than 30 different majors. Le Moyne also provides courses of study leading to a master’s in business administration, education, nursing, occupational therapy, physician assistant studies, arts administration, information systems, and family nurse practitioner. The College's Center for Continuing Education offers evening degrees and certificate programs and houses the Success for Veteran's Program. The College serves approximately 2,800 undergraduate and 700 graduate students. Le Moyne has a culture that values creativity, innovation, service, and thoughtfulness. • The Princeton Review ranked Le Moyne among the top 15 percent of colleges in the nation for the fifth consecutive year and included the College in its guide, The Best 384 Colleges: 2019 Edition.
    [Show full text]
  • 2017 Arc of Onondaga Annual Report
    ANNUAL REPORT 2017 600 S. Wilbur Ave. Syracuse, NY 13204 315.476.7441 Year | 1 www.arcon.org Think Big. Outsource Local. Creative, Innovative Supports and Services Dear Friends, Although 2017 presented challenges, we are pleased to say that, once again, Arc of Onondaga has many wonderful things to report. This past year forced us to sit down and reflect on what matters most; finding ways to operate more efficiently while continuing to provide the high-quality services and supports that people want. Our continued culture shift from caregiver to supporter took center stage as we began to design programs around what matters most to the individuals we serve and move away from standard programmatic options. Ellen Gutmaker Chris Centore Executive Director President of the Board We saw rate changes and cuts in several areas, increased examinations over meeting waiver requirements, decreased referrals to some of our long-standing programs, and lengthy openings in our residential homes due to OPWDD scrutiny over who can move. These changes forced us to examine all of the Board of Directors services we provide across the board to make sure we were utilizing all of our resources and capitalizing on the opportunities Chris Centore brought about by change. We saw a significant increase in the number of people supported through community hab, we opened President a supportive apartment setting for people desiring increased Gone are the days when programs were offered in self-contained, segregated independence, and we also assisted those we support from Chuck Seereiter environments; 2017 brought about new and innovative approaches to the services moving from an apartment setting to three smaller homes where First Vice President they can be better integrated in their community.
    [Show full text]
  • PRESS RELEASE for IMMEDIATE RELEASE Tuesday, January 24, 2012 CONTACT: Patrick Finlon, Marketing Director 315-443-2636 Or [email protected]
    PRESS RELEASE FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Tuesday, January 24, 2012 CONTACT: Patrick Finlon, Marketing Director 315-443-2636 or [email protected] Non-Stop Music in Caroline, or Change by Pulitzer Prize Winner Tony Kushner and Tony Nominee Jeanine Tesori (Syracuse, NY)— Two powerhouses of the American theatre, playwright Tony Kushner (Angels in America) and composer Jeanine Tesori (Thoroughly Modern Millie and Shrek: The Musical), join forces on a musical of startling creativity and refreshing originality (don’t be surprised when the washing machine starts to sing). A stellar cast led by Greta Oglesby delivers powerful vocals in this unconventional, through-composed musical, the recipient of six Tony nominations followed by the Olivier Award for Best Musical. The year is 1963—civil rights and Kennedy—and in the Gellman household in Lake Charles, Louisiana, eight-year-old Noah struggles with the loss of his mother, while Caroline, the family’s African American maid, struggles as a single Mom of four children. Through Caroline and Noah’s friendship, Kushner and Tesori explore thoughts on economic hardship and racial inequity that are relevant today as they were in the early 60s. Rich with humor, humanity and of course music—ranging from blues to gospel to traditional Jewish melodies—Caroline, or Change delivers a deep and uplifting message about change, in big ways and small. Running February 1—26, Caroline, or Change will be performed in the Archbold Theatre at Syracuse Stage, 820 East Genesee Street. Tickets range $18-$50 and are available at the Syracuse Stage Box Office, 315-443-3275 or www.SyracuseStage.org.
    [Show full text]
  • Parks, Recreation
    SYRACUSE PARKS & RECREA 63(1&(5675((76<5$&86(1<::: TION 6<5$&86(1<863$5.6 STEPHANIE A. MINER, MAYOR %AYE M8HAMMA', &OMMISSIONER -OHN :A/SH, 'EP8TY &OMMISSIONERIOONER FIND US ON FACEBOOK 2I¿FH RI WKH 0D\RU 6WHSKDQLH $ 0LQHU 0D\RU 'HDU 1HLJKERUV $V VXPPHU DSSURDFKHV , LQYLWH \RX DQG \RXU IDPLO\ WR VKDUH 0DLQ2I¿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± 6\UDFXVH 1< 0DJQDUHOOL 0F&KHVQH\3DUN ± )D[ 1RUWKHDVW 6HDOV .LUN3DUN YOUNG LUNGS AT PLAY 6RXWKZHVW ,Q DQ HIIRUW WR FUHDWH D FOHDQ DQG KHDOWKIXO HQYLURQ :HVWPRUHODQG PHQW IRU DOO SDUNV SDWURQV WKH &LW\ RI 6\UDFXVH
    [Show full text]
  • Needs Assessment November 2006
    Needs Assessment November 2006 Syracuse Metropolitan Transportation Council Edwards and Kelcey with Wallace Roberts and Todd Alta Planning and Design University Hill Transportation Study Needs Assessment TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.OVERVIEW .......................................................................................................2 a. Introduction................................................................................................................2 b. Report Organization ..................................................................................................3 2. LAND USE AND TRANSPORTATION DEMAND .............................................4 a. Existing Land Uses....................................................................................................5 b. Proposed Land Use Changes – the Current Planned Vision (CPV)........................11 c. Anticipated Impacts on Travel Demands.................................................................14 3. NEEDS BY TRAVEL MODE ...........................................................................17 a. Interstate Access.....................................................................................................18 b. Transit......................................................................................................................32 c. Institutional Parking .................................................................................................42 d. Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities.............................................................................49
    [Show full text]
  • City of Syracuse Consolidated Plan Year 30 2004-2005
    Mayor Matthew J. Driscoll City of Syracuse Consolidated Plan Year 30 2004-2005 Prepared by the Department of Community Development 201 E. Washington Street, Room 612 Syracuse, New York 13202 April 2004 Consolidated Plan 2004-2005 Public Comments Consolidated Plan 2004-2005 Public Hearing March 29, 2004 Consolidated Plan 2004-2005 Newspaper Articles Draft Consolidated Plan 2004-2005 Announcement of Availability Draft Consolidated Plan 2004-2005 Public Meeting March 10, 2004 Community Needs Meeting October 23, 2003 Request for Proposals September 2003 Table of Contents 2004-2005 (Year 30) Consolidated Plan Page No. Executive Summary 1 Section 1 Introduction 10 Purpose 11 Key Participants 13 Citizen Participation 18 Community Profile 35 Section 2 Housing Market Analysis 41 Housing Market Study 42 Syracuse Housing Authority 45 Assisted Housing 55 Continuum of Care Strategy 61 Barriers to Affordable Housing 76 Fair Housing Initiatives 79 Section 3 Housing and Homeless Needs Assessment 90 Housing Needs 91 Housing Needs Assessment 92 Homeless Population Needs 99 Special Needs Population 106 Section 4 Economic Development 112 Section 5 Historic Preservation 124 Collaborative Preservation Efforts 125 Historic Preservation: 290 E. Onondaga Street 126 Section 6 Strategic Plan 140 Housing Strategic Plan 141 Homeless Strategic Plan 146 Community Development Strategic Plan 147 Public Facilities 148 Planning & Administration 149 Infrastructure 150 Public Services 151 Economic Development 152 Barriers to Affordable Housing 156 Lead-Based Paint Hazards
    [Show full text]
  • CED-78-80 Commuter Railroad Safety Activities on Conrail's Lines in New
    DOURPSNT RESURE 05618 - [B07656911 to Z A Com,:ter ailroad Safety Activities on Conrail's Lies in ew York Should Be Iproved. CD-78-80; B-164497(5). arch 15, 1978. Released arch 15, 19780 27 pp. + 5 appendices (12 pp.). Report to Rsp. Fred B. Rooey, Chairman, ouse Committee on Interstate and Foreign Commerce: Transportation and Commerce Subcommittee; by obert F. Keller, cting Comptroller General. Issue Area: Transportation Syst,i~s and Policies (2400). contact: Cosaunity and conomic Developseut Div. Budget Function: Conserce and Traasportation: Ground Transportation (404). Organization Concerned: Department of T ansportation; Federal Railroad Adainistration. Consolidated Rail Corp. Congressional Reevance: ouse Cosmittee on Iterstate and Foreign Coamore; House Coamittee on Interstate and Foreign Coamerce: Transportation ani Coamerce Subcommittee; Senate Committee o Commserce. Rep. Fred B. Rooney. Authority: Locomotive Inspection Act (45 U.S.C. 22). ccident Reforts Act (45 U.S.C. 38). ors of Service Act (45 U.S.C. 61). signal Inspection ct 49 U.S.C. 26). Federal Railroad Safety Act ,f 1970. 45 U.S.C. 431. =49 C.P.R. 213. 49 C..R. 230. 49 .i.R. 236. =49 C.F.R. 217. 49 C.F.R. 228. The Federal Railroad Adainistration (RA) is responsible for regulating safety functions, investigating acci.dent and issuing reports on them, and adinistering railroad safety laws. The Consolidated Rail Corporation (Conrail), which operates cosmuter services in the few York metropolitan aria, is responsible for implementing safety requirements through inspection, setting of standards, accident reporting, and recordkeeping. T'indings/Conclusicns: Conrail did rot conduct all safety activities prescribed by FRA regulations.
    [Show full text]
  • Adolescent Crisis Respite Program Greater Binghamton Health Center
    ADOLESCENT CRISIS RESPITE PROGRAM GREATER BINGHAMTON HEALTH CENTER Program is located at 425 Robinson St. Binghamton, NY 13904 Point of Contact Kathryn Simons, Program Coordinator Phone Number (607) 773-4625 Email [email protected] What population is served by Adolescents ages 13-17. 12 year olds considered for crisis stay upon this program? determination of appropriateness. What are the programs Crisis admissions require adolescents to manage themselves safely in an eligibility requirements? outpatient setting, without evidence of suicidal intent or plan. Adolescents who are not at risk of imminent danger to themselves or others are eligible. Adolescents using the 3-5-day respite stay are required to be in ongoing counselling, with a primary mental illness diagnosis. How to refer: Crisis admission referrals can come from CPEP, licensed providers (including school social workers or psychologists) or through the ACR coordinator if on duty. Respite referrals can come from primary therapists or other service providers. If being submitted by community service provider or school, referral must have sign off by adolescent’s primary therapist for counselling and diagnosis verification. Services What Services Does the The goal of the ACR is to assist adolescents and their families in resolving crisis Program Provide: situations and averting the need for hospitalizations or placement outside the home. Services provided include supervised living arrangements; reinforcement of treatment goals and objectives; crisis intervention; linkages to community mental health services; collaboration with established treatment providers; recreational activities and outings. Additional information Please include any additional The ACR staff approach adolescents and their families from a trauma informed perspective, understanding that the key to successful experiences is building connections and relationships.
    [Show full text]
  • Great Expectations in Store for the Opening of the Syracuse Stage Season
    PRESS RELEASE Wednesday, October 5, 2016 CONTACT: Joanna Penalva, Marketing Manager 315-443-2636 or [email protected] Great Expectations in Store for the Opening of the Syracuse Stage Season Fast-paced, easy-to-understand take on the classic is sure to delight everyone from novices to Dickens devotees PRESENTING SPONSOR: SEASON SPONSORS: MEDIA SPONSORS: The Dorothy and Marshall Syracuse Media Group Central New York Business M. Reisman Foundation Destiny USA Journal Urban CNY SPONSORS: WAER Public Media M&T Bank Aloft Syracuse Inner Harbor SYRACUSE, NY –Syracuse Stage opens its 2016-2017 season with Charles Dickens’ classic Great Expectations. Adapted for the stage by Gale Childs Daly and directed by Michael Bloom, the production runs Oct. 19 – Nov. 6 at the Archbold Theatre in the Syracuse Stage/SU Drama Complex, 820 E. Genesee Street. The story of Great Expectations traces the life of Pip, an orphan in 19th century England. From childhood through adulthood, he rises from poor beginnings as he aspires to be a gentleman. In a journey filled with kindness and cruelty, Pip comes to realize that an increase in wealth and status does not necessarily make a happy and fulfilled life. Daly’s foray into Great Expectations began when she was assigned to write a 45- minute stage adaptation of the book as part of an educational outreach tour. “I thought that was impossible,” says Daly of the task, “But I said okay.” The success of the outreach tour led to her writing the adaptation’s current two-act version, a project that took two years to complete.
    [Show full text]