J. Pestic. Sci. 46(2): 125-142 (2021)
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Common and Chemical Names of Herbicides Approved by the WSSA
Weed Science 2010 58:511–518 Common and Chemical Names of Herbicides Approved by the Weed Science Society of America Below is the complete list of all common and chemical of herbicides as approved by the International Organization names of herbicides approved by the Weed Science Society of for Standardization (ISO). A sponsor may submit a proposal America (WSSA) and updated as of September 1, 2010. for a common name directly to the WSSA Terminology Beginning in 1996, it has been published yearly in the last Committee. issue of Weed Science with Directions for Contributors to A herbicide common name is not synonymous with Weed Science. This list is published in lieu of the selections a commercial formulation of the same herbicide, and in printed previously on the back cover of Weed Science. Only many instances, is not synonymous with the active ingredient common and chemical names included in this complete of a commercial formulation as identified on the product list should be used in WSSA publications. In the absence of label. If the herbicide is a salt or simple ester of a parent a WSSA-approved common name, the industry code number compound, the WSSA common name applies to the parent as compiled by the Chemical Abstracts Service (CAS) with compound only. CAS systematic chemical name or the systematic chemical The chemical name used in this list is that preferred by the name alone may be used. The current approved list is also Chemical Abstracts Service (CAS) according to their system of available at our web site (www.wssa.net). -
Nomenclature of Commonly Available Herbicides in India
NOMENCLATURE OF COMMONLY AVAILABLE HERBICIDES IN INDIA Prior to the widespread use of chemical herbicides, mechanical control and cultural controls, such as altering soil pH, salinity, or fertility levels were used to control weeds. The first widely used herbicide was 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid, often abbreviated 2,4-D which kills many broadleaf plants while leaving grasses largely unaffected (high doses of 2,4-D at crucial growth periods can harm grass crops such as maize or cereals). The low cost of 2,4-D has led to continued usage today and it remains one of the most commonly used herbicides in the world. In 1950s triazine family of herbicides, which includes atrazine was introduced. Atrazine does not break down readily (within a few weeks) after being applied to soils of above neutral pH. Atrazine is said to have carryover, a generally undesirable property for herbicides. Glyphosate, frequently sold under the brand name Roundup, was introduced in 1974 for non- selective weed control. It is now a major herbicide in selective weed control in growing crop plants due to the development of crop plants that are resistant to it. Many modern chemical herbicides for agriculture are specifically formulated to decompose within a short period after application. This is desirable as it allows crops which may be affected by the herbicide to be grown on the land in future seasons. However, herbicides with low residual activity (i.e., that decompose quickly) often do not provide season-long weed control. List of herbicides with their common name -
'Tqiltfl Gn Qrahdt 'T.T+Ttfl - 3Cg U\To
qlc{l}s'fts d'r rL'ftl-tct oilc{-sfl 'tqiltfl gN qRaHdt 't.t+ttfl - 3Cg U\tO r5rfr I ff EEtf,IlFfrt u f Effltfy lt|.[b.ft rrti uQqarcj.e{ tI[ troa C tJdderor il.&a, ?ooc scrrr u (r) o{l Page No.-1 f,iar- o{l qRqa t{ls (irL{l.oer .rdt.rfl fd.atclotL ct.3 \/oL/?oog, crr'oc/oc/?o1'e{ ' q2t {lrlSl-loeoog-3 3 tt3 sY-r,rtaAqttjil.e r'ti' sct ufdtrr{lat s}tis "i' q"cf otg r{. - ? o q, d[. O S,/o Y,/ ? o t q D' ) {./ ?U / 3 . 3,/ Y 3 o t Uq'o / t Ul{|'qtq'( r,tell uqtQ.a secrt:{ l,tta. E } {[d.ft r,t[Qstt r't[0'G.qq"t 5a{ - u dact.{ +qai m&e sa.rt"t ortqaf riLl}.sA.t Stualsr G.A.D.) ql "[L sl{ rtat i.qn sr.rt:{i r,tO.a E. qi. at. ot,/ott/?o?o"t qQ(Adl uutgl rtuaa sacrtul r,rtda D. ar{trrt - te,/oq,/?o?o ql.cft)s'fts o't A"{l{a ou"s{l 't.til{t 5G. qRqHdl "t.{il{-3CS YttO ,ffiu )aftgf't.t. oesgo Qet c?Y .ra<,ig daaafl sldn <.r+u{ gR qG.oRdt dqut{-3e9 u\to Page No.-2 {r[dd ui uRqqcj.E ot/or{/?o?o r,rqstrQlsr 93?gt [d.ot.t ULctL dtGt? 1. {+urq {+errua, GEeit, stqf ui gerf"0 ficra] ox {+€rtat u[0.stflr,i. -
Ecological Risk Assessment for Saflufenacil
TEXT SEARCHABLE DCOUMENT 2011 UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460 OFFICE OF CEMICAL SAFETY AND POLLUTION PREVENTION PC Code: 118203 DP Barcode: 380638 and 381293 Thursday, April 07, 2011 MEMORANDUM SUBJECT: Ecological Risk Assessment for Saflufenacil Section 3 New Chemical Uses as a harvest aid on dry edible beans, dry peas, soybean, oilseeds "sunflower subgroup 20B", oilseeds "cotton subgroup 20C", and oilseeds canola "subgroup 20A". TO: Kathryn Montague, M.S., Product Manager 23 Herbicide Branch Registration Division (RD) (7505P) FROM: ~ Mohammed Ruhman, Ph.D., Agronomist 2 :4- . ""=- ........ 04!tJt! (I neith Sappington, Senior Biologist/Science Adviso~.... Vd- Environmental Risk Branch V O'f/ .../ II Environmental Fate and Effects Division (7507P) THROUGH: Mah Shamim, Ph.D., Branch Chief Environmental Risk Branch VI Environmental Fate and Effects Division (7507P) This ecological risk assessment for saflufenacil new uses is relying on the attached previous assessment (Attachment 1). As shown in the usage summary (Table 1), the single and seasonal rate, for all the crops range from 0.045 to 0.089 lbs a.i/A are within the range application rates used in exposure modeling for the 2009 Section 3 New Chemical Environmental Fate and Ecological Risk Assessment (DP Barcode 349855). Therefore, risk findings determined for the 2009 assessment may be used in the assessment for this submittal. Specifically, the 2009 assessment found no chronic risks to avian and mammalian species at an agricultural use rate 0 0.134 lb a.i.lA. Acute risks were not determined for birds and mammals since saflufenacil was not acutely toxic at the highest doses tested. -
What's Eating You? Chiggers
CLOSE ENCOUNTERS WITH THE ENVIRONMENT What’s Eating You? Chiggers Dirk M. Elston, MD higger is the common name for the 6-legged larval form of a trombiculid mite. The larvae C suck blood and tissue fluid and may feed on a variety of animal hosts including birds, reptiles, and small mammals. The mite is fairly indiscrimi- nate; human hosts will suffice when the usual host is unavailable. Chiggers also may be referred to as harvest bugs, harvest lice, harvest mites, jiggers, and redbugs (Figure 1). The term jigger also is used for the burrowing chigoe flea, Tunga penetrans. Chiggers belong to the family Trombiculidae, order Acari, class Arachnida; many species exist. Trombiculid mites are oviparous; they deposit their eggs on leaves, blades of grass, or the open ground. After several days, the egg case opens, but the mite remains in a quiescent prelarval stage. Figure 1. Chigger mite. After this prelarval stage, the small 6-legged larvae become active and search for a host. During this larval 6-legged stage, the mite typically is found attaches at sites of constriction caused by clothing, attached to the host. After a prolonged meal, the where its forward progress has been impeded. Penile larvae drop off. Then they mature through the and scrotal lesions are not uncommon and may be 8-legged free-living nymph and adult stages. mistaken for scabies infestation. Seasonal penile Chiggers can be found throughout the world. In swelling, pruritus, and dysuria in children is referred the United States, they are particularly abundant in to as summer penile syndrome. -
Of in Partial Fulfillment of the Of
CHEMICAL SEEDBED PREPARATION FOR ZERO-TILLAGE CROP PRODUCTION A Thesi s Submitted to the Facu ltY of Graduate Studi es The Uni versi tY of Manitoba by Larry hliI Iiam TaYlor In Partial Fulfillment of the Requi rements for the Degree of I4aster of Sc i ence Department of Pl ant Science t4ay L977 ''CHEMICAL SEEDBED PREPARATION FOR ZERO-TILLAGE CROP PRODUCTION'' by LARRY IdILLIAI4 TAYLOR A rlissertation submitted to the Facutty of Craduate Studics <¡f the University of Manitoba in partial fulfillment of the roquirements of tht' degree of MASTTR OF SCIENCE @ 1977 Pernlission hus becn gr:rntcrl to th'j LIB¡ìARY OF '¡'llU l''NlvUlì- slTY oF MANtTollr\ to lctr<l or selt copics <¡f this tlissertr¡liot¡' t() thc NATIONAL LIBR^RY OF (:ANAI)A to rtlicrofilm this dissertatir.¡n and to lend or soll copics of the l'ilnl, ¿¡nd UNtvtiRSlTY MICROFILMS to publish ru übstruct of this dissertation' The ¡utl¡or reserves other ¡rublicittion rights' and neithcr the dissertttion ttor extcnsive extr cts liom it rrlay be printcd or other- wise reproduccd without thc author's wt ittctl ¡rertttissiotl' 'll ABSTRACT Taylor, Larry hli1ìiam. M'Sc., The University of Manitoba' flay , 1977 . Chemi cal Seedbed Preparati on for Zero-ti I I age Crop Productìon. Major Professor; Elmer H. Stobbe' Field trials were conducted under zero-tillage conditions to study broadspectrum annual weed control with applications of paraquat and glyphosate. Broadleaf herbicides were mixed wìth the paraquat and glyohosate treatments to find their.impact on the effectiveness and cost for chemical seedbed preparation. Excellent broadleaf annual weed control resuited when 0'28 kglha of bromoxyni 1 was added to 0'42 kg/ha of paraquat. -
2,4-Dichlorophenol AMBIENT WATER QUALITY CRITERIA FOR
United States Office of Water EPA 440 5-80-042 Environmental Protection Regulations and Standards October 1980 Agency Criteria and Standards Division Washington DC 20460 EPA Ambient Water Quality Criteria for 2,4-dichlorophenol AMBIENT WATER QUALITY CRITERIA FOR 2,4-DICHLOROPHENOL Prepared By U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY Office of Water Regulations and Standards Criteria and Standards Division Washington, D.C. Office of Research and Development Environmental Criteria and Assessment Office Cincinnati, Ohio Carcinogen Assessment Group Washington, D.C. Environmental Research Laboratories Corvalis, Oregon Duluth, Minnesota Gulf Breeze, Florida Narragansett, Rhode Island DISCLAIMER This report has been reviewed by the Environmental Criteria and Assessment Office, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, and approved for publication. Mention of trade names or commercial products does not constitute endorsement or recommendation for use. AVAILABILITY NOTICE This document is available to the public through the National Technical Information Service, (NTIS), Springfield, Virginia 22161. ii FOREWORD Section 304 (a)(1) of the Clean Water Act of 1977 (P.L. 95-217), requires the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency to publish criteria for water quality accurately reflecting the latest scientific knowledge on the kind and extent of all identifiable effects on health and welfare which may be expected from the presence of pollutants in any body of water, including ground water. Proposed water quality criteria for the 65 toxic pollutants listed under section 307 (a)(1) of the Clean Water Act were developed and a notice of their availability was published for public comment on March 15, 1979 (44 FR 15926), July 25, 1979 (44 FR 43660), and October 1, 1979 (44 FR 56628). -
THE PESTICIDES and TOXIC CHEMICALS ACT, 2008 No. 12 Of
ANTIGUA AND BARBUDA THE PESTICIDES AND TOXIC CHEMICALS ACT, 2008 No. 12 of 2008 [ Printed in the Official Gazette Vol. XXIX No. 10 dated 12th February , 2009. ] ________ Printed at the Government Printing Office, Antigua and Barbuda, by Eric T. Bennett, Government Printer — By Authority, 2009. 800—2.09 [ Price$11.70 ] The Pesticides and Toxic Chemicals Act, 2008. No. 12 of 2008 No. 12 of 2008 The Pesticides and Toxic Chemicals Act, 2008. THE PESTICIDES AND TOXIC CHEMICALS ACT, 2008 ARRANGEMENT Sections 1. Short title and commencement. 2. Interpretation. 3. Establishment and constitution of the Board. 4. Functions and duties of the Board. 5. Registrar of Pesticides and Toxic Chemicals. 6. Licence to exterminate. 7. Analysts, inspectors, medical examiners and others. 8. Controlled product. 9. Offences in regard to prohibited substance or product. 10. Regulation of prohibited substance or product. 11. Powers of inspectors. 12. Analysis. 13. Medical examiners. 14. Detention and forfeiture of articles seized. 15. Regulations. 16. Offences by corporations. 17. Evidence and sufficiency of proof. 18. Record keeping and reporting. 19. Confidentiality. 20. Notice of non-compliance. 21. Right of appeal. 22. Penalties. 23. Immunity. 24. Indemnity. 25. Application to the State. 26. Repeal. The Pesticides and Toxic Chemicals Act, 2008. No. 12 of 2008 Schedules Schedule 1 – Constitution of the Pesticides and Toxic Chemicals Control Board Schedule 2 – Controlled products Schedule 3 – Prohibited Products No. 12 of 2008 The Pesticides and Toxic Chemicals Act, 2008. [L.S.] I Assent, Louise Lake-Tack, Governor-General. 31st December, 2008 ANTIGUA AND BARBUDA THE PESTICIDES AND TOXIC CHEMICALS ACT, 2008 No. -
Epidemiology and Treatment of Sarcoptic Mange in Bu:Ffalo Calves Around Lahore
Paki.wan Vel. J.. 18 (/ J · !91JS EPIDEMIOLOGY AND TREATMENT OF SARCOPTIC MANGE IN BU:FFALO CALVES AROUND LAHORE Farhat Jabeen. N. Ahmad1, M. Anwar Chaudhry and Ijaz Javed1 Livestock and Dairy Development Department. Punjab. 1Facuhy of Veterinary Science. University of Agriculture. Faisalabad. Pakistan ABSTRACT A project was conducted to study the prevalence of sarcoptic mange in buffalo calves around Lahore city. The effects of age and sex of the calf and the seasons of the year on the incidence of this disease were also investigated. For this purpose, 2000 buffalo calves. varying in age from I to 12 momhs. \Verc examined over a 12 month period, from January to December, 1994. The results showed thai 7. 00 1;; ' 140 out of 2000) of the calves were infected with the disease. The highest prevalence ( 12.67%) was recorded in winter while the lowest (0.46%) in summer. During spring and autumn, the prevalence of the problem was R. 94 and 8. 17%, respectively. Sex of the calf did not seem to influence the prevalence <51 .42 1fr; for malt calves and 48.58% for females). However. the prevalence was remarkably higher among calves less than 8 months of age than 8-12 month old calves (82.14 v 17.86%). External trealment of 35 affected culves with 0.2% solution of Neguvon resulted in 100% recovery within 20 day�. INTRODUCTION MATERIALS AND l\1ETH(lDS Ectoparasitcs are responsible for great economic A total of 2000 buffalo calves. varying in a�e frum losses to liveswck industry . Btsides causing great to 12 months, were examined for the pn:scncc 11! irritation and unrest. -
Classification of Herbicides
Title of the course : Weed Management Credit: 3(2+1) Class : 3rd Year IInd Semester Title of the topic : Principles of weed management College : Krishi vigyan Kendra,College of Agriculture, Rewa, JNKVV, Jabalpur Name of Teacher : Dr. (Mrs.) Smita Singh Classification of Herbicides Herbicides: Chemical method of weed control is very effective in certain cases and have great scope provided the herbicides are cheap, efficient and easily available. The chemicals used for killing the weeds or inhibiting growth of weeds are called herbicides (Weedicides). Classification of Herbicides: Herbicides are classified in different ways: A) First Group Chemical Herbicides: I) Classification of herbicides according to chemical composition. II) Classification of herbicides according to their use. III) Classification of herbicides based on time of application. IV) Classification of herbicides according to Formulation. V) Classification of herbicides according to residual effect. B) Second Group – Bio herbicides C) Third Group herbicidal mixtures. Classification of herbicide I) Classification of Herbicide Based on Chemical Nature or Composition Compounds having chemical affinities are grouped together. This is useful in liting and characterising herbicides. i) Inorganic Herbicides:Contain no carbon actions in their molecules. These were the first chemicals used for weed control before the introduction of the organic compounds, example are: a) Acids:Arsenic acid, arsenious acid, arsenic trioxide sulphuric acid. b) Salts:Borax, copper sulphate, ammonium sulphate, Na chlorate , Na arsenite , copper nitrate. ii) Organic Herbicides:Oils and non oils contain carbon and hydrogen in their molecules. a) Oils: Diesel oil, standard solvent, xylene-type, aromatic oils, polycyclic , aromatic oils etc. b) Aliphatics:Dalapon, TCA, Acrolein, Glyphosphate methyl bromide. -
Comparative Effects of Growth Inhibitors on Sterol Metabolism in the Nematode Caenorhabditis Elegans
Camp. Biochem. Physiol. Vol. 79C, No. 1, pp. 21-26, 1984 0306-4492/84$3.00 + 0.00 Printed in Great Britain 0 1984Pergamon Press Ltd COMPARATIVE EFFECTS OF GROWTH INHIBITORS ON STEROL METABOLISM IN THE NEMATODE CAENORHABDITIS ELEGANS RUBEN LOZANO*~, DAVID J. CHITWOOD, WILLIAM R. LUSBY, MALCOLM J. THOMPSON, JAMES A. SVOBODA and GLENN W. PATTERSON* Insect Physiology Laboratory, ARS, USDA, Beltsville, MD 20705 and *Department of Botany, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA. Telephone: (301) 344-2389 (Received 9 February 1984) Abstract-l. An analogous series of dimethylalkyl compounds, consisting of four amines, an amide, and a phosphonate ester, inhibited motility and reproduction of the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. 2. Dimethylamines with straight-chain lengths of 12, 14, or 16 carbon atoms were equally active nematicides, causing greater than 80% population growth inhibition at a concentration of 25 ppm. 3. The C,, straight-chain amine and its corresponding amide produced similar inhibition and were much more potent than either the corresponding C,, phosphonate or a C,, branched-chain amine. 4. Inhibition of the A”-sterol reductase system was exhibited by all four amines, but not by the amide or phosphonate, in the following order of activity: C,2 branched-chain amine > C,? straight-chain amine > C,, amine > C,, amine. 5. The C,, branched amine also blocked the C-24(28)-dehydrogenase system in the conversion of sitosterol to fucosterol, the initial step in sitosterol dealkylation. INTRODUCTION 1978; Svoboda et al., 1978; Thompson et al., 1978). In some cases, they blocked conversion of phy- Research of model compounds as potential agricul- tosterols to cholesterol in insects (Robbins et al., tural pesticides has revealed interesting biological 1975; Cohen et al., 1983). -
Agricultural Pesticide Use Trends in Manitoba and 2,4-D Fate in Soil
AGRICULTURAL PESTICIDE USE TRENDS IN MANITOBA AND 2,4-D FATE IN SOIL BY Janna L. Wilson A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of Graduate Studies of The University of Manitoba in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Department of Soil Science University of Manitoba Winnipeg, Copyright © 2012 by Janna Wilson THE UNIVERSITY OF MANITOBA FACULTY OF GRADUATE STUDIES ******* COPYRIGHT PERMISSION AGRICULTURAL PESTICIDE USE TRENDS IN MANITOBA AND 2,4-D FATE IN SOIL BY Janna L. Wilson A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of Graduate Studies in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Copyright © 2012 by Janna Wilson Permission has been granted to the Library of the University of Manitoba to lend or sell copies of this thesis, to the National Library of Canada to microfilm this thesis and to lend or sell copies of the film, and to the University Microfilms Inc. to publish an abstract of this thesis. This reproduction or copy of this thesis has been made available by authority of the copyright owner solely for the purpose of private study and research, and may only be reproduced and copied as permitted by copyright laws or with express written authorization from the copyright owner. ABSTRACT Wilson, Janna Leah, Ph.D. The University of Manitoba, October 2012. Agricultural Pesticide Use Trends in Manitoba and 2,4-D Fate in Soil. Major Professor; Annemieke Farenhorst. In the last century, agricultural intensification on the Canadian prairies has resulted in increased pesticide use with the potential to expose non-target organisms to pesticides as a result of non-point source pollution.