Infrastructure + Public Utilities
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more
Recommended publications
-
Littlerock Reservoir Sediment Removal Project Final EIS/EIR
Littlerock Reservoir Sediment Removal Project C. AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES Implementation of Alternative 1 would result in the same impacts to candidate, sensitive, or special- status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by CDFW, Forest Service, or USFWS species as described for the Project. Sensitive plants (Impact BIO-12) or invertebrates (Impact BIO-13) were not found in the disturbance area and would be subject to the same direct and indirect impacts as the Project. Implementation of Alternative 1 may result in a minor reduction in road kill to butterflies should they occur from fewer truck trips. Implementation of Alternative 1 would result in the same impacts to southwestern pond turtles (Impact BIO-14), two-striped garter snakes (Impact BIO-15), coast range newts (Impact BIO-16), and sensitive amphibian and reptile species (Impact BIO-17) as described for the Project. Reduced water levels required to construct in July could reduce habitat for these species in the Reservoir; however, fluctuating water levels at the reservoir occur during below-normal rain years. Implementation of Alternative 1 would result in the same impacts to burrowing owls (Impact BIO-18), special status nesting birds (Impact BIO-19), special status bats (Impact BIO-20), and other special-status mammals (Impact BIO-21, Impact BIO-22, and Impact BIO-23) or greater as described for the Project. The commencement of work on July 1 would increase the likelihood of disturbing active breeding birds or disrupt mammal denning or pupping should they occur. Implementation of the same SPCs for the Project would reduce impacts to biological resources identified under Criterion BIO 3 from Alternative 1. -
BIOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT TERACOR Resource Management
APPENDIX B: BIOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT TERACOR Resource Management, Inc., General Biological Assessment for a 4.75-Acre Property in the City of Palmdale, California, January 14, 2019. [This Page Intentionally Left Blank] GENERAL BIOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT FOR A 4.75-ACRE PROPERTY IN THE CITY OF PALMDALE, CALIFORNIA ASSESSOR’S PARCEL NO. 3010-030-023 Located within Section 35 of the Ritter Ridge, California Quadrangle within Township 6 north, Range 12 west Prepared for: City of Palmdale, California and Meta Housing Corporation 11150 W. Olympic Blvd., Suite #620 Los Angeles, California 90064 Prepared by: TERACOR Resource Management, Inc. 27393 Ynez Road, Suite 253 Temecula, California 92591 (951) 694-8000 Principal Investigator: Samuel Reed [email protected] Fieldwork conducted by: Samuel Reed and Jared Reed 14 January 2019 General Biological Assessment TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................. 1 2.0 Methods .................................................................................................................................................. 3 3.0 Vegetation Communities and Land Covers ........................................................................................... 11 4.0 Wildlife .................................................................................................................................................. 12 5.0 Sensitive Species Analysis .................................................................................................................. -
San Gabriel Watershed and Mountains Special Resource Study and Environmental Assessment
Draft San Gabriel Watershed and Mountains Special Resource Study and Environmental Assessment September 2011 Produced by the Pacifi c West Regional Offi ce Park Planning and Environmental Compliance National Park Service San Francisco, California U.S. Department of the Interior Washington, DC Top, left to right: Frank G. Bonelli Regional Park, NPS photo; Inspiration Point, Angeles National Forest, NPS photo. Bottom: Eaton Canyon Natural Area, NPS photo. California Broom Sage, Santa Clara River near Acton. Photo courtesy of BonTerra Consulting. National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior San Gabriel Watershed and Mountains Special Resource Study & Environmental Assessment Errata October 2012 1 San Gabriel Watershed and Mountains Special Resource Study & Environmental Assessment Errata October 2012 The following errata provide factual corrections, additions, and revisions to the Draft San Gabriel Watershed and Mountains Special Resource Study and Environmental Assessment (draft study report/EA), dated September 2011. Changes to the draft study report/EA, and references to the page number where the change has occurred are provided. The reader must have access to a copy of the draft study report/EA in order to fully understand the changes. Additional copies of this document and the September 2011 report can be downloaded from the internet at www.nps.gov/pwro/sangabriel. Printed copies are also available on request from the address below. National Park Service Attn: San Gabriel Watershed and Mountains Special Resource Study 333 Bush Street, Suite 500 San Francisco, CA 94104 2 INTRODUCTION The following document includes errata that correct and add factual information to the September 2011 Draft San Gabriel Watershed and Mountains Special Resource Study and Environmental Assessment (draft study report/EA). -
2013 Hazard Mitigation Plan Is Provided in the Following Tables for Specific Projects
2013 City of Lancaster Hazard Mitigation Plan 9/4/2013 Submitted by: MLC & Associates, Inc. 3525 Hyland Avenue, Suite 265 Costa Mesa, CA 92626 www.MLCHQ.com City of Lancaster Hazard Mitigation Plan TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION 1. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................... 1-1 Acknowledgements ................................................................................................................................ 1-1 Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................... 1-2 Los Angeles County Operational Area and Disaster Management Areas .............................................. 1-2 Hazard Mitigation Plan Organization ...................................................................................................... 1-4 Mitigation Strategy Five-Year Action Plan .......................................................................................... 1-4 Hazard Mitigation Plan Participants ................................................................................................... 1-4 Hazard Mitigation Plan Mission .......................................................................................................... 1-4 Hazard Mitigation Plan Goals ............................................................................................................. 1-5 Strategy Organization ....................................................................................................................... -
Local Hazard Mitigation Plan
Public Works Department 38250 Sierra Highway Palmdale, CA 93550 661-267-5300 661-267-5292(fax) www.cityofpalmdale.org LOCAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN September 30, 2016 (update per FEMA Comments) (5 year update 2016-2021) ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ City of Palmdale Local Multihazard Mitigation Plan 1 CITY OF PALMDALE LOCAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN – 2016 - 2021 UPDATE Table of Contents SECTION PAGE Adoption Resolution ......................................................................................................Under cover Title Page ....................................................................................................................... 1 Table of Contents ............................................................................................................2 Acknowledgements .........................................................................................................7 Executive Summary .........................................................................................................7 SECTION ONE – BACKGROUND & COMMUNITY PROFILES 1.1 Definition of Hazard Mitigation ........................................................................11 1.2 Why Develop a Hazard Mitigation Plan ............................................................12 1.3 Purpose of the Plan ............................................................................................16 1.4 General Planning Requirements in California ...................................................16 -
2017 Watershed Sanitary Survey & Source Water
2017 WATERSHED SANITARY SURVEY & SOURCE WATER ASSESSMENT UPDATE Littlerock Reservoir and Lake Palmdale Watersheds B&V PROJECT NO. 197191 served. PREPARED FOR Palmdale Water District 18 DECEMBER 2017 ©Black & Veatch Holding Company 2017. All rights re Palmdale Water District | 2017 WATERSHED SANITARY SURVEY & SOURCE WATER ASSESSMENT UPDATE Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ......................................................................................................................................... 1 ES.1 OVERVIEW .................................................................................................................................................. 1 ES.2 BACKGROUND ............................................................................................................................................. 1 ES.3 STUDY AREA ............................................................................................................................................... 1 ES.4 PROJECT OBJECTIVES .................................................................................................................................. 1 ES.5 DELINEATION OF CONTRIBUTING AREAS .................................................................................................... 2 ES.6 WATER SUPPLY INFRASTRUCTURE .............................................................................................................. 2 ES.6.1 Groundwater .................................................................................................................................... -
Revised Draft Antelope Valley Watermaster 2018 Annual Report
Revised Draft Antelope Valley Watermaster 2018 Annual Report July 8, 2019 Watermaster Engineer REVISED DRAFT Antelope Valley Watermaster 2018 Annual Report July 8, 2019 2490 Mariner Square Loop, Suite 215 Alameda, CA 94501 510.747.6920 www.toddgroundwater.com Third Annual Report, Calendar Year 2018 Antelope Valley Groundwater Cases, Judicial Council Coordination Proceeding No. 4408, Santa Clara Case No.: 1-05-CV-049053, Superior Court of the State of California, County of Los Angeles - Central District Antelope Valley Watermaster Board of Directors The Antelope Valley Watermaster is charged with administering adjudicated water rights and managing groundwater resources within the Adjudication Area of the Antelope Valley. The five-member Board includes: Robert Parris, Chairperson Dennis Atkinson, Vice Chairperson Adam Ariki John Calandri Leo Thibault Antelope Valley Watermaster Engineer 2490 Mariner Square Loop, Suite 215 Alameda, CA 94501 510.747.6920 www.toddgroundwater.com Table of Contents Message from the Watermaster Board ...................................................................................... i 1 Introduction ...................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Background ............................................................................................................. 1 1.2 Purpose and Scope ................................................................................................. 3 1.3 Report Organization .............................................................................................. -
Geologic Notes on Select Field Stops
GEOLOGIC NOTES ON SELECT FIELD STOPS Location map of the four STOPS at or near the San Andreas Fault to be visited during the field trip. STOP # 1: Vasquez rocks, # 2: Palmdale, # 3: Devil’s Punchbowl Park, and # 4: Pallet Creek. The linear feature, running NW-SE is the San Andreas Fault. STOP #1. VASQUEZ ROCKS NATURAL AREA, AGUA DULCE Physical Address: 10700 Escondido Canyon Rd, Agua Dulce, CA 91390 From West Los Angeles College (WLAC), get on I-405 N in Culver City from Overland Ave and Culver Blvd. Follow I-405 N and CA-14 N for a total of about 41.5 miles to Agua Dulce Canyon Road. Take Exit 15 (Vazquez Rocks) and continue on Agua Dulce Canyon Road Drive to Escondido Canyon Road for about 2.2 miles. Total drive time on weekends from WLAC is approximately 45 minutes. Page 1 of 11 VASQUEZ ROCKS AT AGUA DULCE Vasquez rocks natural area park is a 932-acre park located in the Sierra Pelona mountains, in northern Los Angeles county. It is located in the town of Agua Dulce between the suburbs of Santa Clarita and Palmdale. The area is also visible from the antelope valley freeway (State Route 14). The rock formations were formed by rapid erosion during uplift about 25 million years ago and later exposed by activity along the San Andreas fault. The Tataviam American Indians were living here when the Spanish arrived. Their language was probably a Takic Uto-Aztecan language. They lived in grass huts within villages. With the coming of the Spanish missions, some members of this people were forced to work there. -
Land Use and Water Use in the Antelope Valley, California
LAND USE AND WATER USE IN THE ANTELOPE VALLEY, CALIFORNIA By WILLIAM E. TEMPLIN, STEVEN P. PHILLIPS, DANIEL E. CHERRY, MYRNA L DeBORTOLI, and OTHERS U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY WATER-RESOURCES INVESTIGATIONS REPORT 94-4208 Prepared in cooperation with the ANTELOPE VALLEY WATER GROUP I C-J Sacramento, California 1995 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BRUCE BABBITT, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY GORDON P. EATON, Director Any use of trade, product, or firm names in this publication is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. For sale by the U.S. Geological Survey Earth Science Information Center Open-File Reports Section Box 25286, MS 517 Denver Federal Center Denver, CO 80225 For additional information write to: District Chief U.S. Geological Survey Federal Building, Room W-2233 2800 Cottage Way Sacramento, CA 95825 CONTENTS Abstract .................................................................. 1 Introduction ................................................................ 1 Purpose and Scope ....................................................... 2 Previous Studies ......................................................... 3 Acknowledgments ........................................................ 3 Description of Study Area ...................................................... 4 Land Use by Templin W.E., Cherry, D.E., Haltom, T.C., and McPherson, K.R. ................. 6 Land-Use Classification for National Resource Appraisal, U.S. Geological Survey ........... 10 Land-Use Classification for -
Mojave Desert Ecoregional Assessment
MMoojjaavvee DDeesseerrtt EEccoorreeggiioonnaall AAsssseessssmmeenntt Mojave Desert Ecoregional Assessment September 2010 Version 1.1 The Nature Conservancy of California 201 Mission Street, 4th Floor San Francisco, CA 94105 Planning Team John M. Randall Sophie S. Parker James Moore Brian Cohen Laura Crane Bill Christian Dick Cameron Jason B. Mackenzie Kirk Klausmeyer Scott Morrison The Mission of The Nature Conservancy is to preserve the plants, animals and natural communities that represent the diversity of life on Earth by protecting the lands and waters they need to survive. Cover photographs by James Moore and Bill Christian © 2010 Recommended Citation: Randall, J. M., S.S. Parker, J. Moore, B. Cohen, L. Crane, B. Christian, D. Cameron, J. MacKenzie, K. Klausmeyer and S. Morrison. 2010. Mojave Desert Ecoregional Assessment. Unpublished Report. The Nature Conservancy, San Francisco, California. 106 pages + appendices. Available at: http://conserveonline.org/workspaces/mojave/documents/mojave-desert- ecoregional-2010/@@view.html. Mojave Desert Ecoregional Assessment Table of Contents List of Tables ...........................................................................................................................vi List of Figures ........................................................................................................................ vii Acknowledgements ............................................................................................................... viii Executive Summary ............................................................................................................... -
Supplemental Alternatives Analysis Report
Palmdale to Burbank Supplemental Sacramento Alternatives Stockton Analysis Transbay Transit Center Modesto Millbrae-SFO Redwood City or Palo Alto San Jose Merced Report (Potential Station) June 2015 Gilroy Fresno Kings/Tulare Bakersfield Palmdale East Burbank San Gabriel Valley Ontario Airport Los Angeles Riverside/Corona Norwalk Anaheim Murrieta Escondido San Diego This Page Intentionally Left Blank California High-Speed Rail Project Palmdale to Burbank SUPPLEMENTAL ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS REPORT JUNE 2015 This Page Intentionally Left Blank CALIFORNIA HIGH-SPEED RAIL PROJECT SUPPLEMENTAL ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS PALMDALE TO BURBANK SECTION JUNE 2015 TABLE OF CONTENTS ES1 Executive Summary ....................................................................................................................... 1 ES 1.1 Palmdale to Burbank Project Section Background ............................................................. 1 ES 1.2 Summary of Recommendations in the SAA ....................................................................... 1 ES 1.3 Public and Agency Outreach Efforts ................................................................................... 3 ES 1.4 Next Steps ........................................................................................................................... 3 1 Supplemental Alternatives Analysis Report ............................................................................... 4 1.1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................ -
Earth Science Field Trips in Southern California
Earth Science Field Trips in Southern California Tor Bjorn Lacy Associate Professor Cerritos College Earth Science Department 11110 Alondra Boulevard Norwalk California, 90650 (562) 860-2451 x2662 [email protected] Table of Contents Acknowledgements ............................................................................................................... v Preface ................................................................................................................................ vii Maps ..................................................................................................................................... 1 Planning a Field Trip .............................................................................................................. 3 The Big Picture: Overview of the Geology of Southern California ............................................ 7 Chapter 1 – Joshua Tree National Park ................................................................................. 11 Chapter 2 – Pisgah Crater and Amboy Crater ........................................................................ 25 Chapter 3 – The San Andreas Fault, Mormon Rocks, and Devil’s Punchbowl Natural Area .... 37 Chapter 4 – Vasquez Rocks Natural Area .............................................................................. 51 Chapter 5 – San Gabriel Mountains and the San Andreas Fault ............................................. 63 Chapter 6 – Crystal Cove State Park ....................................................................................