DOCSLIB.ORG

Local Hazard Mitigation Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Local Hazard Mitigation Plan Public Works Department 38250 Sierra Highway Palmdale, CA 93550 661-267-5300 661-267-5292(fax) www.cityofpalmdale.org LOCAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN September 30, 2016 (update per FEMA Comments) (5 year update 2016-2021) ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ City of Palmdale Local Multihazard Mitigation Plan 1 CITY OF PALMDALE LOCAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN – 2016 - 2021 UPDATE Table of Contents SECTION PAGE Adoption Resolution ......................................................................................................Under cover Title Page ....................................................................................................................... 1 Table of Contents ............................................................................................................2 Acknowledgements .........................................................................................................7 Executive Summary .........................................................................................................7 SECTION ONE – BACKGROUND & COMMUNITY PROFILES 1.1 Definition of Hazard Mitigation ........................................................................11 1.2 Why Develop a Hazard Mitigation Plan ............................................................12 1.3 Purpose of the Plan ............................................................................................16 1.4 General Planning Requirements in California ...................................................16 1.5 Community Profile: ...........................................................................................17 1.6 Public Services and Infrastructure .....................................................................20 1.7 Analysis of Development Trends.......................................................................25 SECTION TWO – PLANNING PROCESS 2.1 Overview of Planning Process ...........................................................................29 2.2 Participation in the Planning Process .................................................................30 2.3 Incorporation of Existing Plans, Studies, and Technical Information ...............32 2.4 Public and Shareholder Involvement .................................................................34 2.5 Local Capabilities and Resources……………………………………………..37 SECTION THREE – RISK ASSESSMENT 3.1 Risk Assessment Process ...................................................................................40 3.2 Identifying Hazards ............................................................................................40 3.3 Profiling Hazards ...............................................................................................42 Earthquake .......................................................................................................42 Previous Occurrences.........................................................................................45 Probability of Future Events ..............................................................................49 ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ City of Palmdale Local Multihazard Mitigation Plan –5 year update 2016-2021 2 SECTION PAGE Earthquake Related Hazards ..............................................................................51 Floods, Dam Failure and Inundation Hazards .............................................52 Flood Hazard ......................................................................................................52 Previous Occurrences.........................................................................................55 Probability of Future Events ..............................................................................56 Wildfire Hazards/Brush Fires ........................................................................56 Wildfire/Brush Fire ............................................................................................56 Previous Occurrences.........................................................................................57 Probability of Future Events ..............................................................................62 Transportation Accident/Hazmat Spill ..........................................................66 Transportation Accident/ Hazardous Materials Release ....................................66 Previous Occurrences and Probability of Future Events ...................................66 Drought .............................................................................................................68 What is Drought .................................................................................................68 Previous Occurrences.........................................................................................68 Impacts of Drought ............................................................................................69 Mitigation of the Impacts of Drought ................................................................69 Probability of Future Events ..............................................................................70 Severe Weather ................................................................................................70 Severe Weather Hazard ......................................................................................70 Previous Occurrences.........................................................................................70 Probability of Future Events ..............................................................................75 Power/Utility Failure .......................................................................................74 Introduction ........................................................................................................74 Previous Occurrences.........................................................................................75 Probability of Future Events ..............................................................................75 3.4 Inventorying Assets ...........................................................................................75 City-Owned Assets ............................................................................................75 Privately-Owned Assets .....................................................................................75 Identification of Critical Infrastructure and Facilities .......................................77 3.5 Assessing Vulnerability and Estimating Potential Losses .................................79 Overview ............................................................................................................79 Earthquake .......................................................................................................81 Vulnerability of Critical Public Infrastructure and Facilities ............................85 Estimating Potential Losses ...............................................................................86 ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ City of Palmdale Local Multihazard Mitigation Plan –5 year update 2016-2021 3 SECTION PAGE Flood, Dam Failure and Inundation...............................................................90 Vulnerability Assessment ..................................................................................90 Estimating Potential Losses ...............................................................................93 Wildfires/Brush Fires ......................................................................................93 Vulnerability Assessment ..................................................................................93 Estimating Potential Losses ...............................................................................95 Transportation Accident/Hazmat Spill .........................................................99 Introduction ...................................................................................................... 99 Vulnerability Assessment ................................................................................101 Estimating Potential Losses .............................................................................106 Drought ...........................................................................................................106 Vulnerability Assessment ................................................................................106 Estimating Potential Losses .............................................................................106 Severe Weather ..............................................................................................107 Vulnerability Assessment ................................................................................107 Estimating Potential Losses .............................................................................107 Power/Utility Failure .....................................................................................107 Vulnerability Assessment ................................................................................107 Estimating Potential Losses .............................................................................108 3.6 Analyzing Development Trends ......................................................................111
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 2020 Fresno-Kings Unit Fire Plan
    Fresno-Kings Unit 5/03/2020 UNIT STRATEGIC FIRE PLAN AMENDMENTS Page Numbers Description Updated Date Section Updated Updated of Update By 4/30/20 Appendix A 36-38 Fire Plan Projects B. Garabedian 4/30/20 Appendix B 40-41 Added Wildland Activity B. Garabedian Chart 4/30/20 Appendix C 42 Update Ignition Data B. Garabedian 4/30/20 Various 103-119 2019 Accomplishment B. Garabedian i TABLE OF CONTENTS UNIT STRATEGIC FIRE PLAN AMENDMENTS .................................................................................... i TABLE OF CONTENTS ......................................................................................................................... ii SIGNATURE PAGE ............................................................................................................................... iii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ....................................................................................................................... 1 SECTION I: UNIT OVERVIEW ............................................................................................................. 3 UNIT DESCRIPTION ....................................................................................................................... 3 FIRE HISTORY ................................................................................................................................ 4 UNIT PREPAREDNESS AND FIREFIGHTING CAPABILITIES ..................................................... 4 SECTION II: COLLABORATION..........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Collaborative Directory: Pacific Northwest Region U.S
    Collaboration 101 Information compiled by Tchelet Segev, Angeles National Forest Powerhouse Fire Settlement Coordinator Feather River Stewardship Coalition 1 Acknowledgements Many Forest Service and collaborative points of contact provided the information contained in this report. Additional information was gathered courtesy of collaborative websites and other Forest Service staff. Almost all general collaboration guidance were taken from the Pacific Northwest Region’s Collaborative Directory: Pacific Northwest Region U.S. Forest Service. Collaborative Directory. U.S. Forest Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture. June 2017. https://www.fs.usda.gov/Internet/FSE_DOCUMENTS/fseprd 567241.pdf 2 Acronyms BLM Bureau of Land Management CCI California Climate Investments CE Categorical Exclusion CFLR Collaborative Forest Landscape Restoration DM Decision Memo EIS Environmental Impact Statement FS (or USFS) Forest Service FSC Fire Safe Council NEPA National Environmental Policy Act NF National Forest NOAA National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration NPS National Park Service NRCS National Resources Conservation Service MSA Master Stewardship Agreement R5 Region 5 (equivalent to the Pacific Southwest Region) RCD Resource Conservation District USFWS United States Fish and Wildlife Service WO Washington Office 3 What is Collaboration? Collaboration… is a process in which people with diverse views work together to achieve a common purpose. It involves sharing information and ideas to expand everyone’s knowledge of a topic or project, while identifying
    [Show full text]
  • Hillforts: Britain, Ireland and the Nearer Continent
    Hillforts: Britain, Ireland and the Nearer Continent Papers from the Atlas of Hillforts of Britain and Ireland Conference, June 2017 edited by Gary Lock and Ian Ralston Archaeopress Archaeology Archaeopress Publishing Ltd Summertown Pavilion 18-24 Middle Way Summertown Oxford OX2 7LG www.archaeopress.com ISBN 978-1-78969-226-6 ISBN 978-1-78969-227-3 (e-Pdf) © Authors and Archaeopress 2019 Cover images: A selection of British and Irish hillforts. Four-digit numbers refer to their online Atlas designations (Lock and Ralston 2017), where further information is available. Front, from top: White Caterthun, Angus [SC 3087]; Titterstone Clee, Shropshire [EN 0091]; Garn Fawr, Pembrokeshire [WA 1988]; Brusselstown Ring, Co Wicklow [IR 0718]; Back, from top: Dun Nosebridge, Islay, Argyll [SC 2153]; Badbury Rings, Dorset [EN 3580]; Caer Drewyn Denbighshire [WA 1179]; Caherconree, Co Kerry [IR 0664]. Bottom front and back: Cronk Sumark [IOM 3220]. Credits: 1179 courtesy Ian Brown; 0664 courtesy James O’Driscoll; remainder Ian Ralston. All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying or otherwise, without the prior written permission of the copyright owners. Printed in England by Severn, Gloucester This book is available direct from Archaeopress or from our website www.archaeopress.com Contents List of Figures ����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������ii
    [Show full text]
  • Littlerock Reservoir Sediment Removal Project Final EIS/EIR
    Littlerock Reservoir Sediment Removal Project C. AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES Implementation of Alternative 1 would result in the same impacts to candidate, sensitive, or special- status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by CDFW, Forest Service, or USFWS species as described for the Project. Sensitive plants (Impact BIO-12) or invertebrates (Impact BIO-13) were not found in the disturbance area and would be subject to the same direct and indirect impacts as the Project. Implementation of Alternative 1 may result in a minor reduction in road kill to butterflies should they occur from fewer truck trips. Implementation of Alternative 1 would result in the same impacts to southwestern pond turtles (Impact BIO-14), two-striped garter snakes (Impact BIO-15), coast range newts (Impact BIO-16), and sensitive amphibian and reptile species (Impact BIO-17) as described for the Project. Reduced water levels required to construct in July could reduce habitat for these species in the Reservoir; however, fluctuating water levels at the reservoir occur during below-normal rain years. Implementation of Alternative 1 would result in the same impacts to burrowing owls (Impact BIO-18), special status nesting birds (Impact BIO-19), special status bats (Impact BIO-20), and other special-status mammals (Impact BIO-21, Impact BIO-22, and Impact BIO-23) or greater as described for the Project. The commencement of work on July 1 would increase the likelihood of disturbing active breeding birds or disrupt mammal denning or pupping should they occur. Implementation of the same SPCs for the Project would reduce impacts to biological resources identified under Criterion BIO 3 from Alternative 1.
    [Show full text]
  • BIOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT TERACOR Resource Management
    APPENDIX B: BIOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT TERACOR Resource Management, Inc., General Biological Assessment for a 4.75-Acre Property in the City of Palmdale, California, January 14, 2019. [This Page Intentionally Left Blank] GENERAL BIOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT FOR A 4.75-ACRE PROPERTY IN THE CITY OF PALMDALE, CALIFORNIA ASSESSOR’S PARCEL NO. 3010-030-023 Located within Section 35 of the Ritter Ridge, California Quadrangle within Township 6 north, Range 12 west Prepared for: City of Palmdale, California and Meta Housing Corporation 11150 W. Olympic Blvd., Suite #620 Los Angeles, California 90064 Prepared by: TERACOR Resource Management, Inc. 27393 Ynez Road, Suite 253 Temecula, California 92591 (951) 694-8000 Principal Investigator: Samuel Reed [email protected] Fieldwork conducted by: Samuel Reed and Jared Reed 14 January 2019 General Biological Assessment TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................. 1 2.0 Methods .................................................................................................................................................. 3 3.0 Vegetation Communities and Land Covers ........................................................................................... 11 4.0 Wildlife .................................................................................................................................................. 12 5.0 Sensitive Species Analysis ..................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Copy of KPCC-KVLA-KUOR Quarterly Report APR-JUN 2013
    KPCC / KVLA / KUOR Quarterly Programming Report APR MAY JUN 2013 Date Key Synopsis Guest/Reporter Duration Does execution mean justice for the victims of Aurora? If you’re opposed to the death penalty on principal, does the egregiousness of this crime change your view? How Michael Muskal, would you want to see this trial resolved? Karen 4/1/13 LAW Steinhauser, 14:00 How should PCC students, faculty, and administrators handle these problems? Is it Rocha’s responsibility to maintain a yearly schedule? Will the decision to cancel the winter intersession continue to have serious repercussions? Mark Rocha, 4/1/13 EDU Simon Fraser, 19:00 New York City is set to pass legislation requiring thousands of companies to provide paid sick leave to their employees. Some California cities have passed similar legislation, but many more initiatives here have failed. Why? Jill Cucullu, 4/1/13 SPOR Anthony Orona, 14:00 New York City is set to pass legislation requiring thousands of companies to provide paid sick leave to their employees. Some California cities have passed similar Ken Margolies, legislation, but many more initiatives here have failed. Why? John Kabateck, 4/1/13 HEAL Sharon Terman, 22:00 After a week of saber-rattling, North Korea has stepped up its bellicose rhetoric against South Korea and the United States. This weekend, the country announced that it is in a “state of war” with South Korea, and North Korea’s parliament voted to beef up its nuclear weapons arsenal. 4/1/13 FOR David Kang, 10:00 How has big data transformed the way we approach and evaluate information? What will its impact be in years to come? Can this kind of analysis be dangerous, or have significant drawbacks? Kenneth Cukier joins Larry to speak about the revolution of big 4/1/13 LIT data and how it will affect our lives.
    [Show full text]
  • An Examination of Regionality in the Iron Age Settlements and Landscape of West Wales
    STONES, BONES AND HOMES: An Examination of Regionality in the Iron Age Settlements and Landscape of West Wales Submitted by: Geraldine Louise Mate Student Number 31144980 Submitted on the 3rd of November 2003, in partial fulfilment of the requirements of a Bachelor of Arts with Honours Degree School of Social Science, University of Queensland This thesis represents original research undertaken for a Bachelor of Arts Honours Degree at the University of Queensland, and was completed during 2003. The interpretations presented in this thesis are my own and do not represent the view of any other individual or group Geraldine Louise Mate ii TABLE OF CONTENTS Title Page i Declaration ii Table of Contents iii List of Tables vi List of Figures vii Abstract ix Acknowledgements x 1. The Iron Age in West Wales 1 1.1 Research Question 1 1.2 Area of Investigation 2 1.3 An Approach to the Iron Age 2 1.4 Rationale of Thesis 5 1.5 Thesis Content and Organisation 6 2. Perspectives on Iron Age Britain 7 2.1 Introduction 7 2.2 Perspectives on the Iron Age 7 2.2.1 Progression of Interpretations 8 2.2.2 General Picture of Iron Age Society 11 2.2.3 Iron Age Settlements and Structures, and Their Part in Ritual 13 2.2.4 Pre-existing Landscape 20 2.3 Interpretive Approaches to the Iron Age 20 2.3.1 Landscape 21 2.3.2 Material Culture 27 2.4 Methodology 33 2.4.1 Assessment of Methods Available 33 2.4.2 Methodology Selected 35 2.4.3 Rationale and Underlying Assumptions for the Methodology Chosen 36 2.5 Summary 37 iii 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Minimizing Social and Economic Impacts of Increased Post-Fire Debris-Flow Occurrence, Including Climate Change Effects
    Minimizing Social and Economic Impacts of Increased Post-Fire Debris-Flow Occurrence, Including Climate Change Effects Final Report to the Joint Fire Science Program JFSP Contract 12-2-01-35 Principal Investigators: Steffen Rebennack, Colorado School of Mines (PI) Paul Santi, Colorado School of Mines (Co-PI) Daniel Kaffine, University of Colorado Boulder (Co-PI) Dennis Staley, U.S. Geological Survey (Co-PI) September 30, 2015 Colorado School of Mines United States Geological Survey Joint Fire Science Program FINAL REPORT Project Title: Minimizing Social and Economic Impacts of Increased Post-Fire Debris-Flow Occurrence, Including Climate Change Effects JFSP Contract 12-2-01-35 Principal Investigator(s): Steffen Rebennack1, Paul Santi2, Daniel Kaffine3, Dennis Staley 4 Researcher(s): Kevin M. McCoy2, Vitaliy Krasko1, Timo Lohmann1, Ian Donovan2, Hayden Brown2 Affiliations: 1Colorado School of Mines, Division of Economics and Business 2Colorado School of Mines, Department of Geology and Geological Engineering 3University of Colorado Boulder, Department of Economics 4U.S. Geological Survey, Landslide Hazards Program Addresses: 1,2 1500 Illinois St, Golden, CO 80401 3 Economics Building Room 212, 256 UCB, Boulder, CO 80309-0256 4 Box 25046, DFC, MS 966, Denver CO 80225 Telephone/Facsimile Number(s): 1(303)273-3925 (Rebennack) 2(303)273-3108 (Santi) 3(303)492-6652 (Kaffine) 4(303) 271-8568 (Staley) E-mail: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] Point of Contact: Steffen Rebennack, Colorado School of Mines, Division of Economics and Business, 1500 Illinois Street, Golden, CO 80401, (303)273-3925, [email protected] Federal Cooperator: Dennis Staley, U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Managing Wildfire Damage on the PCT Left to Right: the PCT Passes Through an Area of the Russian Wilderness in California That Was Severely Burned
    Managing wildfire damage on the PCT Left to right: The PCT passes through an area of the Russian Wilderness in California that was severely burned. Photo by Mike Taylor. Klamath National Forest soil scientist Joe Blanchard looks over fire damage to the Grider Creek Bridge. Photo by Laura Shaffer, Klamath National Forest. Fire left a patchwork along the PCT south of Etna Summit in the Russian Wilderness. Photo by Mike Taylor. By Ian Nelson, PCTA Regional Representative ildfire is a fact of life in the West and is part of the for- PCT closures and possible detours gets to trail users during these There is much we don’t know yet about the damage to the PCT commit multiple hitches of one of our American Conservation est’s natural cycle. While fires can be beneficial, they hectic times. and surrounding landscape. Based on fire maps and on the ground Experience crews to the Grider Creek section in June and July. also can have significant consequences for the PCT, As wildfires grow and threaten the PCT, Forest Service leaders reconnaissance before the winter snow began to fly, it is estimated Klamath National Forest and PCTA staff will visit the low-elevation especially the trail user experience. will consider closing the trail to protect public safety. Closing public that approximately 20 disconnected miles of the PCT burned in site over the winter to further assess the damage. W the Klamath National Forest in 2014. While that may sound like a During my 10 years as PCTA’s Regional Representative for land is not taken lightly.
    [Show full text]
  • Chips from a German Workshop. Vol. III. by F
    The Project Gutenberg EBook of Chips From A German Workshop. Vol. III. by F. Max Müller This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included with this eBook or online at http://www.gutenberg.org/license Title: Chips From A German Workshop. Vol. III. Author: F. Max Müller Release Date: September 10, 2008 [Ebook 26572] Language: English ***START OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK CHIPS FROM A GERMAN WORKSHOP. VOL. III.*** CHIPS FROM A GERMAN WORKSHOP BY F. MAX MÜLLER, M. A., FOREIGN MEMBER OF THE FRENCH INSTITUTE, ETC. VOLUME III. ESSAYS ON LITERATURE, BIOGRAPHY, AND ANTIQUITIES. NEW YORK: CHARLES SCRIBNER AND COMPANY. 1871. Contents DEDICATION. 2 I. GERMAN LITERATURE. 3 LIST OF EXTRACTS FOR ILLUSTRATING THE HISTORY OF GERMAN LITERATURE. 39 II. OLD GERMAN LOVE-SONGS. 48 III. YE SCHYPPE OF FOOLES. 58 IV. LIFE OF SCHILLER. 68 V. WILHELM MÜLLER. 1794-1827. 90 VI. ON THE LANGUAGE AND POETRY OF SCHLESWIG-HOLSTEIN. 108 VII. JOINVILLE. 144 VIII. THE JOURNAL DES SAVANTS AND THE JOUR- NAL DE TRÉVOUX. 179 IX. CHASOT. 187 X. SHAKESPEARE. 200 XI. BACON IN GERMANY. 203 XII. A GERMAN TRAVELLER IN ENGLAND. 217 XIII. CORNISH ANTIQUITIES. 223 XIV. ARE THERE JEWS IN CORNWALL? . 268 XV. THE INSULATION OF ST. MICHAEL'S MOUNT. 294 XVI. BUNSEN. 317 LETTERS FROM BUNSEN TO MAX MÜLLER IN THE YEARS 1848 TO 1859. 360 Footnotes . 485 [i] DEDICATION. TO FRANCIS TURNER PALGRAVE, IN GRATEFUL REMEMBRANCE OF KIND HELP GIVEN TO ME IN MY FIRST ATTEMPTS AT WRITING IN ENGLISH, AND AS A MEMORIAL OF MANY YEARS OF FAITHFUL FRIENDSHIP.
    [Show full text]
  • Usfs/Nfwf Wildfire Restoration Grant Program Powerhouse ‐ Plantation Reforestation 2021 Anf Priority Project Request
    USFS/NFWF WILDFIRE RESTORATION GRANT PROGRAM POWERHOUSE ‐ PLANTATION REFORESTATION 2021 ANF PRIORITY PROJECT REQUEST I. Project Description a. Powerhouse Reforestation ‐ Plantations– Steven Bear b. The 2020 Lake Fire impacted of over 31,142 acres of coastal sage scrub, montane chaparral, oak woodlands, riparian woodland areas, ponderosa pine, gray pine, bigcone Douglas‐fir stands and plantations. The Lake Fire occurred within and in direct proximity to the Powerhouse Fire of 2013. The ANF estimates that approximately 10,225 acres of bigcone Douglas‐fir, interior ponderosa pine, Sierra Nevada Mixed Conifer and gray pine stands, mixed conifer/oak and plantations were deforested through the actions of this wildfire. Deforestation as described by the USFS is when a tree stand loses over 50% of its basal area or trees per acre. Deforestation requires intervention by the Forest Service to re‐establish the stand to the pre‐existing density and species composition. Without this intervention, the tree stands are at greater risk to convert to a different vegetation community type. A recent survey and mapping project have shown that bigcone Douglas‐fir mortality is increasing and its extent decreasing through drought, insects and fire. c. The Angeles National Forest seeks to restore conifer vegetation types altered by the Powerhouse, and subsequent Lake Fire, including bigcone Douglas‐fir, gray pine, ponderosa pine and plantations within the burned areas. This project focuses on reforestation of the plantations deforested by fire (404 acres). (See attached map.) Reforestation of native tree stands (9,821 acres) will be addressed in a separate project. Restoration establish forest vegetation through planting, and re‐planting if necessary.
    [Show full text]
  • The Impact Off Crusader Castles Upon European Western Castles
    THE IMPACT OF CRUSADER CASTLES UPON EUROPEAN WESTERN CASTLES IN THE MIDDLE AGES JORDAN HAMPE MAY 2009 A SENIOR PROJECT SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENT FOR THE DEGREE OF BACHELOR OF ARTS IN ARCHAEOLOGICAL STUDIES UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN- LA CROSSE Abstract: During the Middle Ages, the period from roughly AD 1000-1450, the structure of castles changed greatly from wooden motte and bailey to stone keeps and defenses within stone city walls. The reason for the change was largely influenced by the crusades as Europeans went to the Holy Lands to conquer. In addition to conquering, these kings brought back a new way of designing and fortifying their castles in England, Wales and France. Without the influence of the crusades, what we think of as true middle age castles would not exist. For my paper I will analyze the impact the crusades had on forming the middle age castles by evidence surviving in the archaeological record from before and after the crusades as well as modifications done on castles to accommodate crusader changes to show the drastic influence of crusader castle fortifications upon English, Welsh and French castles. 1 Introduction Construction of what is believed to be true middle age castles from A.D. 1000 to 1450 began as kings arrived back from the crusades to the Holy Lands, bringing with them ideas of how to make their castles grander and more easily defensible. Before the crusades William I of England was beginning to develop a new concentric style of castle beginning with the Tower of London. After the crusades many English, Welsh and French kings took the concentric concept and combined it with what they saw on the crusades and developed it to become majestic castles and fortresses like Chateau Gaillard in France, Dover Castle in England, and Caernarvon Castle in Wales.
    [Show full text]