DOCSLIB.ORG

Family Feud 5Th Edition

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Family Feud 5Th Edition PLAYING FOR 3 OR MORE PLAYERS: Throughout the game, players will try to match their answers with the most popular survey answers. Each game consists of three parts: The Face-Off, The Feud and The Fast Money Bonus Round. THE SCOREBOARD: The scoreboard is used to keep track of the game as follows: 1. The Face-Off and The Feud rounds, the answers and points are placed in the scoreboard section, with the number one answer and it’s points placed at one, the number two answer and it’s points placed at two, etc. 2. At the end of each survey question, the points are totaled and placed under that team’s number in The Feud section of the 5th Edition scoreboard. INSTRUCTIONS 3. In The Fast Money Bonus Round, one side of the scoreboard is used by one player for his answers and the AND ROUNDS 1-45 opposite side for his teammate. In a two player game, one player uses both sides. OBJECT: After all five questions, the points are then added and To have the most points at the end of three games by placed in the Total section. matching the most popular survey answers. THE FACE-OFF: CONTENTS: Each Feud round begins with a Face-Off as a player from 1 Scoreboard, 1 Answer Board, 1 Wipe-off Marker, 1 each team tries to take control of the question by giving the Survey Question/ Instruction Book, 1 Strike Indicator with 3 most popular answer. “X” Strikes Each team chooses a player for The Face-Off. The Emcee SET UP: reads aloud Question #1. When either of the two players has 1. Separate the strike indicator and the three “X” markers an answer, he raises his hand (in case of a tie, the Emcee and place within easy reach. decides who responded first). He then must answer the question immediately. If his answer matches an answer on the 2. Each page in the book contains two complete rounds. board, the Emcee announces the answer, it’s placement on the One round equals a Face-Off, The Feud and The Fast scoreboard and the points to place next to the answer. Money Bonus Round. NOTE: If a player fails to give an answer he immediately 3. Choose a player to be the Emcee. loses his turn. If the player gives the number one answer, the team wins The Face-Off and The Feud Round begins 4. The remaining players divide into two teams. If there is (see The Feud) If the player gives an answer that is not one an uneven number of players, make the teams as evenly of the survey answers responses, or is not the most popular balanced as possible. answer, the player on the opposing team gets to answer the question. If the opposing team’s player gives a more EMCEE DUTIES: popular answer, that team wins The Face-Off. If his answer The Emcee will read the questions, operate the strike is not more popular, The Face-Off continues as follows: indicator, announce the answer, it’s point value and placement on the scoreboard and give out prize money. 1. If the second player gives a less popular answer, the first Question #3: A new player from each team is chosen for The player’s team wins The Face-Off. Face-Off and question is played as before. Question #3 value is 300 points. The player or team with the most points after three 2. If both players give an answer that isn’t on the survey, question rounds may elect to go first or second in The Fast Money a new player from each team is chosen to answer the Round. In the Case of a tie, the Emcee will decide who goes first. question in the same order as the first two players. In a three player game, each player gets another chance, in THE FAST MONEY BONUS ROUND: turn, until a winner is determined. Unlike the TV game show, BOTH teams playing the Family Feud home game will play in The Fast Money Round. 3. The answers and their point values are then written on the scoreboard. Who plays: If the team consists of one player, that player THE FEUD: plays. For two players, both play. For teams of three or The Winner of The Face-Off may play the question or pass the more players, the team chooses two players to play The Fast question to the other team. Money Bonus Round. Players cannot help teammates choose the most popular answers. Question #1: Players on the controlling team take turns 1. The Emcee reads aloud Fast Money Question #1. If there guessing the answers to Question #1. Players cannot help is one player playing, that player gives two answers that each other answer the question. In a three player game, he feels are the most popular. Those answers are written on the player on the controlling team tries to give all the the scoreboard on lines 1 and 6 and the Emcee tells them remaining answers before three strikes are made. the points aloud, if any. If there are two players, one player answers and points will be put on line one of the scoreboard, Emcee Duties: The Emcee announces how many answers the other player’s answer will go on line six. Two players on there are to the survey. When a player gives a correct the same team cannot have the same answer. answer, the Emcee announces the answer, placement on the scoreboard and the corresponding points for that answer. 2. Fast Money Questions #2–#5 are played and scored the same way, with their answers written on lines 2 and 7, etc. When a player gives an incorrect answer or takes too long to give an answer (determined by the Emcee), it counts 3. When all five Fast Money Questions have been played, as a strike. The Emcee puts one “X” marker on the strike the Emcee totals the points for all the chosen answers. All fast indicator, beginning with the “Strike One” square. money participants must leave the room until it is their turn to answer so they don’t hear the questions/answers already Winning the Round: If the controlling team gives all the given. Team 1 will answer first, followed by team 2. Players remaining answers to Question #1 without getting three strikes, on the same team may not repeat answers. After team 1 has they win 100 points for the round. If the controlling team gets played, their score is totaled and the answer board is wiped three strikes before all the remaining answers are guessed, the clean for team 2 to answer the same 5 fast money questions. opposing team takes control and is allowed one guess to try In The Fast Money Bonus Round, players will choose what and match any remaining answer. If the opposing team guesses they feel are the two most popular survey answers. correctly, they then win the 100 points for Question #1. If they don’t guess correctly, the team who originally controlled the FAST MONEY SCORING: question gets the points. Any team earning more than 200 points in The Fast Money NOTE: If all the answers to the questions have not been revealed, Round will automatically be awarded an additional 500 the team who wins the round only gets the points equal to the bonus points to add to their overall score from all Feud rounds. answers that were guessed correctly on the scoreboard. Any team earning less than 200 points in The Fast Money Round will add the total number of points earned in the round Question #2: A new member from each team is chosen for The Face-Off and the Emcee reads Question #2 aloud. to their overall score from all Feud rounds. The game is played the same as in Question #1 but the The team with the highest total points after The Feud and point value is 200 points. The Fast Money Rounds wins the game. 13 ABOUT ALL IT SHAKE 20 IN FOOT RIGHT PUT 3 GAME #90 IN HAND LEFT PUT 24 AROUND TURN 4 OUT FOOT LEFT PUT 25 IN FOOT LEFT PUT 6 ROUND 1 IN HAND RIGHT PUT POINTS ANSWERS POINTS NAME YOUR BEST ASSET AS AN EMPLOYEE. ANSWERS ANSWERS POINTS ANSWERS POINTS POKEY. HOKEY THE HARD WORKER 23 HONEST/LOYAL 7 DANCING WHEN DO TO INSTRUCTED YOU’RE SOMETHING NAME DEPENDABLE 13 CREATIVE 4 8 PUNCTUAL/PROMPT 10 PATIENT 3 BOAT YOUR ROW ROW, ROW, 12 LAMB LITTLE A HAD MARY 4 GOOD PERSONALITY 10 BIRTHDAY HAPPY 14 ABC’S 5 MACDONALD OLD 26 TWINKLE TWINKLE, 7 ROUND 2 SPIDER BITSY ITSY POINTS ANSWERS POINTS NAME SOMETHING SPECIFIC YOU DON’T BOTHER CLEANING UNTIL ANSWERS SOMEONE COMES TO VISIT. KNOWS. KID LITTLE EVERY THAT SONG A NAME ANSWERS POINTS ANSWERS POINTS 2 KITCHEN 26 WINDOWS 7 ROOM CLEAN 6 TALK 2 BATHROOM 21 CABINETS 3 READ 7 SMILE/LAUGH 2 LIVING ROOM 8 CLOSETS 3 POTTY 74 STEPS WALK/FIRST 2 BEDROOM 8 TABLE TOPS 3 BIKE A RIDE POINTS ANSWERS POINTS ANSWERS FOR THE FIRST TIME. FIRST THE FOR ROUND 3 DO CHILD THEIR WATCHING LOVE PARENTS SOMETHING NAME NAME A REASON PEOPLE ASK TO CHANGE THEIR SEATS ON AIRPLANES. 9 ANSWERS POINTS ANSWERS POINTS SNACKS 10 COUCH/CHAIR COMFY 3 WANT A WINDOW 26 BODY ODOR 10 PILLOW 13 BEER/DRINKS 3 ANNOYING PERSON 19 FEAR 8 EXERCISE 51 CONTROL REMOTE 9 LOUD KID/BABY 14 SIT BY FAMILY/PAL 7 TV POINTS ANSWERS POINTS ANSWERS NAME SOMETHING A COUCH POTATO NEEDS.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • An Online Cultural Mobility Funding Guide for AFRICA
    An online cultural mobility funding guide for AFRICA — by ART MOVES AFRICA – Research INSTITUT FRANÇAIS – Support ON THE MOVE – Coordination Third Edition — Suggestions for reading this guide: We recommend that you download the guide and open it using Acrobat Reader. You can then click on the web links and consult the funding schemes and resources. Alterna- tively, you can also copy and paste the web links of the schemes /resources that interest you in your browser’s URL field. This guide being long, we advise you not to print it, especially since all resources are web-based. Thank you! Guide to funding opportunities for the international mobility of artists and culture professionals: AFRICA — An online cultural mobility funding guide for Africa by ART MOVES AFRICA – Research INSTITUT FRANÇAIS – Support ON THE MOVE – Coordination design by Eps51 December 2019 — GUIDE TO FUNDING OPPORTUNITIES FOR THE INTERNATIONAL MOBILITY OF ARTISTS AND CULTURE PROFESSIONALS – AFRICA Guide to funding opportunities for the international This Cultural Mobility Funding Guide presents a mapping of mobility of funding opportunities for interna- tional cultural mobility, focused artists and culture on the African continent. professionals The main objective of this cul- tural mobility funding guide is to AFRICA provide an overview of the fund- ing bodies and programmes that support the international mobility of artists and cultural operators from Africa and travelling to Africa. It also aims to provide input for funders and policy makers on how to fill the existing
    [Show full text]
  • ARE YOU RECREATING WORK at HOME? by Billie Anne Grigg | 04/28/2017 Pocket Change
    A R T I C L E ARE YOU RECREATING WORK AT HOME? by Billie Anne Grigg | 04/28/2017 Pocket Change converted by Web2PDFConvert.com converted by Web2PDFConvert.com 2 Recreating work at home. Sounds horrible, doesn’t it? If you run your business from your home, you have no doubt read one of the numerous articles about how to most effectively work from a home-based office. I admit to reading more than a few myself. When you are trying to strike a balance between running your business effectively, while facing the many distractions which accompany working from a home office, you look for all the help you can get. On the surface, these articles provide common sense advice. If you follow this advice, you will no doubt achieve greater effectiveness during your work day. However, all of this “common sense” advice yields one result: recreating work at home. The comfort – and the failure – of a familiar structure When my husband first started homeschooling our oldest son over ten years ago, we fell into a common trap: we tried to recreate the school environment at home. We didn’t go as far as some – I have read tales of homeschooling parents setting up a small-scale classroom, complete with chalkboard and a flag to start the day with the Pledge of Allegiance – but we started the school day promptly at 8am, we spent a set amount of time on each subject, and we even assigned homework. It was an utter failure. We made a common mistake: we adopted a familiar structure, because we thought that structure would result in success.
    [Show full text]
  • From Rancho to Reservoir
    From Rancho to Reservoir: History and Archaeology of the Los Vaqueros Watershed,California edited by Grace H. Ziesing with contributions by Bright Eastman Karana Hattersley-Drayton, M.A. Mary Praetzellis, M.A., SOPA Elaine-Maryse Solari, M.A., Juris Doctor Suzanne B. Stewart, M.A., SOPA Grace H. Ziesing, M.A., SOPA Co-Principal Investigators David A. Fredrickson Adrian Praetzellis Mary Praetzellis prepared for Contra Costa Water District 1231 Concord Avenue Concord, California 94524 prepared by Anthropological Studies Center Sonoma State University Academic Foundation, Inc. 1801 East Cotati Avenue Rohnert Park, California 94928 1997 (reprinted 1999) Note on 1999 reprint: minor corrections have been made to some portions of the text, but they do not constitute a full revision. Cover illustration: Mary Ferrario sits with Evelyn Bonfante and a friend on a Vasco hillside, ca. 1917. TABLE OF CONTENTS Preface v CHAPTER 1. AN INTRODUCTION TO LOS VAQUEROS The Changing Countryside 1 What is the Los Vaqueros Project and Why are We Writing this Report? 2 The Los Vaqueros Watershed 4 An Introduction to the Cultural History of the Watershed 7 Los Vaqueros on the Eve of Settlement 8 FOCUSED ESSAYS: Reservoirs and Historic Preservation: The Legal Framework 9 Preserving the Past: Cultural Resources Management at Los Vaqueros 11 A Different Place: The Prehistoric Landscape 14 Early Residents of Los Vaqueros 17 The Ways and Means of History and Archaeology 21 CHAPTER 2. DISPUTED RANGE: RANCHING A MEXICAN LAND GRANT UNDER U.S. RULE, 1844-1880 The Ranchos
    [Show full text]
  • Unilever Finance Netherlands BV
    11 May 2021 Unilever Finance Netherlands B.V. (guaranteed on a joint and several basis by Unilever PLC and Unilever United States, Inc.) and Unilever PLC (guaranteed by Unilever United States, Inc.) U.S.$25,000,000,000 Debt Issuance Programme Application has been made to the Dutch Authority for the Financial Markets (Stichting Autoriteit Financiële Markten or the “AFM”) in its capacity as competent authority under Regulation (EU) 2017/1129 (the “Prospectus Regulation”) to approve this Information Memorandum for the purpose of giving information with regard to the issue of notes by Unilever PLC (“PLC Notes”) and by Unilever Finance Netherlands B.V. (“UFN Notes”, and together with PLC Notes, “Notes”) under the debt issuance programme described herein (the “Programme”) during the period of 12 months after the date hereof. This Information Memorandum is a base prospectus for the purposes of the Prospectus Regulation. This Information Memorandum has been approved by the AFM, as competent authority under the Prospectus Regulation. The AFM only approves this Information Memorandum as meeting the standards of completeness, comprehensibility and consistency imposed by the Prospectus Regulation. Such approval should not be considered as an endorsement of either the Issuers, the Guarantors or the quality of the securities that are the subject of this Information Memorandum. Investors should make their own assessment as to the suitability of investing in the Notes. The requirement to publish a prospectus under the Prospectus Regulation only applies to Notes which are to be admitted to trading on a regulated market as defined in Directive 2014/65/EU (as amended, “MiFID II”) and/or offered to the public in the European Economic Area (the “EEA”) in circumstances where no exemption is available under the Prospectus Regulation.
    [Show full text]
  • Emblem Catalog, 1957
    'Preamble (L ouelilutioii GrAVE SERVICE SCHOOL A' PROGRAMS NATIONAL HEADQUARTERS • INDIANAPOLIS, INDIANA i DECORATIVE D RAPE S • BAN N E R ETTE S Fast color, red, white and blue cotton bunting. American Legion or Auxiliary emblem in colors. SPECIFY. Suitable for all decoration needs both inside and outside. A. Blue bunting Bannerette, 3x3 feet (American Legion Only) No. 7473 $4.00 A. Blue bunting Bannerette, 3x5 feet (American Legion Only) No. 7474 5.85 B. Bannerette, feet 2x6 —American Legion No. 7475;. Auxiliary No. 3475 2.75 B. Bannerette, 3x9 feet— American Legion No. 7476;. Auxiliary No. 3476 4.60 C. Panel Drape, 2x6 feet — American Legion No. 7480;. Auxiliary No. 3480 4.40 C. Panel Drape, 3x9 feet — American Legion No. 7481;. Auxiliary No. 3481 6.30 IMMEDIATE SHIPMENT BUNTING D. Red, white and blue sewed stripe cotton drapery. Reliance quality 24-in. width, per yard No. 70241 $1.00 36-in width, per yard No. 70361 1.20 DISPLAY PENNANT STRINGS E. Each string consists of 1 2 pennants in assortment of colors, strongly sewed in a folded canvas tape. Reliance quality cotton. Pennant size: 12x18 inches, per string No. 70334 $3.00 16 x 24 inches, per string No. 70335 3.40 20 x 30 inches, per string No. 70336 4.50 STREET DECORATION The Blaw Unit is adaptable for all standard lighting poles, columns, etc. with a diameter of 4 to 7V inches. Constructed of a bronze band with four brass sockets and an adjustable hinged clamp. Flag holders may be placed equai distances apart or grouped for various styles of decorations.
    [Show full text]
  • The Relation Between Customer Types in a Real Supermarket Compared to a Virtual Supermarket 1
    Volume 9, Number 1 Assembled 2016 (Part 1) April 2016 Editor in Chief Yesha Sivan Tel Aviv University, Israel Issue Editor Sue Gregory School of Education University of New England, Australia Coordinating Editor Tzafnat Shpak The JVWR is an academic journal. As such, it is dedicated to the open exchange of information. For this reason, JVWR is freely available to individuals and institutions. Copies of this journal or articles in this journal may be distributed for research or educational purposes only free of charge and without permission. However, the JVWR does not grant permission for use of any content in advertisements or advertising supplements or in any manner that would imply an endorsement of any product or service. All uses beyond research or educational purposes require the written permission of the JVWR. Authors who publish in the Journal of Virtual Worlds Research will release their articles under the Creative Commons Attribution No Derivative Works 3.0 United States (cc-by-nd) license. The Journal of Virtual Worlds Research is funded by its sponsors and contributions from readers. http://jvwresearch.org The Relation between Customer Types in a Real Supermarket Compared to a Virtual Supermarket 1 Volume 9, Number 1 Assembled 2016 (1) April, 2016 The Relation between Customer Types in a Real Supermarket Compared to a Virtual Supermarket Vassilis-Javed Khan Eindhoven University of Technology, The Netherlands Rebecca Brouwer NHTV Breda University of Applied Sciences, The Netherlands Abstract Virtual environments are becoming more popular for a variety of applications. One application we expect to see in the near future is virtual supermarkets.
    [Show full text]
  • Traveling Suitcase Activations-Joburg WG
    Johannesburg Working Group The main case study/story of the The Johannesburg Research Group is a focus on the work of the Medu Art Ensemble (1977 - 1985) Our research story/starting theses/theories informing study/research questions are across three research strings, namely, 1) travelling concepts, 2) radical models of arts education of the 1970s and 3) the activation of historical experiences in claiming histories. The central string is that of radical models of arts education. The project exists as part of a wider recuperative project that seeks to map histories of arts education in southern Africa with the view to producing a more comprehensive understanding of how imported colonial models have come to assert a particular understanding of “arts education” that has often marginalised or attempted to erase the presence of existing local models. The research group aims to demonstrate the active presence of a series of local models that challenge the hegemonic status of imported models. Here we take our cue from Eduard Glissant’s understanding of histories as: The history you ignored – or didn’t make – was it not history? (The complex and mortal anhistorical). Might you not be more and more affected by it, in your fallowness as much as in your harvest? In your thought as much as in your will? Just as I was affected (cit) by ​ ​ the history I wasn’t making, and could not ignore? (1969, 23) ​ In an earlier document the Johannesburg Research Group described its focus in the following ways: The Johannesburg Working group finds resonance in the themes and aims of the international cluster project, ‘Histories’ which are broadly; modes of ‘inhabiting’ histories, history as a ‘resource’, disturbing hegemonial narratives of history and animating, activating counter-hegemonial narratives.
    [Show full text]
  • The News, December 29, 1966
    Murray State's Digital Commons The eN ws Newspapers 12-29-1966 The ewN s, December 29, 1966 The ewN s Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.murraystate.edu/tn Recommended Citation The eN ws, "The eN ws, December 29, 1966" (1966). The News. 701. https://digitalcommons.murraystate.edu/tn/701 This Newspaper is brought to you for free and open access by the Newspapers at Murray State's Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in The eN ws by an authorized administrator of Murray State's Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. John W. Greene, Well Known Here, Ond sif Kentucky's TWO SECTIONS To Make State Race For Auditor Better Weakly Papers The News his won 12. PAGES John W. Greene, who has an adult sure that my long experience awards for out- almost me to establish, expedite, standing excellence every year it lifetime of continuous legis- qualifies Margaret I. 1Ge administrative service in conduct an efficient has been submitted in 'wiping con- lative and and properly Periodical I.DDept.eKiag government apd as a auditing all state and Nett. Libra" state leader in system of University of party, today an: Kentucky, the Democratic county funds." Lexington, Ky. 40506 nounced his candidacy in the May Greene is one of the most widely Volume Thirty-Five Fulton, 42041, Fulton County, Kentucky Thursday, December 29, 196E Number 52 primary for State Auditor of Pub- known men In Kentucky and in the lic Accounts. Mr. Green is well Democratic party. Not only has he known and has many friends in gained close acquaintance; and re- Fulton and West Kentucky.
    [Show full text]
  • Data Match Quest Couch Potatos
    Who’s most like YOU at school? Your answers to the following questions will be matched with everyone else’s. And for way less than the cost of a few slices of pizza, you get two reports showing your best matches and help Make copies support a club or team at your school. for students. Couch Potatoes PLUS: You can even put your reports on AND you can WHITE PAPER Questionnaire created by Heritage High School see ALL your matches at your school at www.Data-Match.com. ONLY! Student Council Association, Leesburg, VA Choose one answer ONLY! 1 2 3 4 5 1. What personality type are you? Hopeless Romantic Heartbreaker Shy and Reserved Adventurous Social Buttery 2. What is your favorite Disney show? That’s So Raven Hannah Montana Suite Life of Zack & Cody Kim Possible Even Stevens 3. What is your future money plan? YOLO, Spend it Freely Rich & Successful Conservative, Save it Money Doesn’t Matter Hit the Lottery 4. What is your least favorite class? Algebra History Economics Biology PE 5. Favorite “style” of potato? Baked Potato French Fries Mashed Potatoes Potato Chips Couch Potato 6. What would you put into a time capsule? My Feelings for Chase Favorite Book Pictures of Family Favorite CD Letter to Myself 7. What is your preferred taste? Sweet Salty Sour Spicy Meat 8. Who would you call for advice? Mom/Dad Sibling Best Friend Coach Oprah 9. Favorite celebrity relationship? Kim/Kanye Taylor Swift/Current Muse Ashton/Mila Beyoncé/Jay-Z Mickey & Minnie 10. What type of person are you? Realistic Idealistic Pessimistic Optimistic Dreamer 11.
    [Show full text]
  • Automatic Food Intake Assessment Using Camera Phones
    Michigan Technological University Digital Commons @ Michigan Tech Dissertations, Master's Theses and Master's Dissertations, Master's Theses and Master's Reports - Open Reports 2012 Automatic Food Intake Assessment Using Camera Phones Fanyu Kong Michigan Technological University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.mtu.edu/etds Part of the Computer Engineering Commons Copyright 2012 Fanyu Kong Recommended Citation Kong, Fanyu, "Automatic Food Intake Assessment Using Camera Phones", Dissertation, Michigan Technological University, 2012. https://doi.org/10.37099/mtu.dc.etds/494 Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.mtu.edu/etds Part of the Computer Engineering Commons AUTOMATIC FOOD INTAKE ASSESSMENT USING CAMERA PHONES By Fanyu Kong A DISSERTATION Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY (Computer Engineering) MICHIGAN TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY 2012 c 2012 Fanyu Kong This dissertation, "Automatic Food Intake Assessment Using Camera Phones," is hereby approved in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHI- LOSOPHY IN COMPUTER ENGINEERING. Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Signatures: Dissertation Advisor Dr. Jindong Tan Department Chair Dr. Daniel R. Fuhrmann Date Dedication To my wife and my parents! . Contents List of Figures . .xviii List of Tables ......................................xix Preface .........................................xxi Acknowledgments . .xxiii Abstract .........................................xxv 1 Introduction .................................... 1 1.1 Obesity: A challenge to public health . .1 1.2 Food intake assessment . .3 1.3 Opportunity and challenges . .4 1.4 Goals and specific aims . .5 1.5 Organization of this thesis . .6 Reference . .7 vii 2 DietCam: Automatic Dietary Assessment with Mobile Camera Phones . 11 Abstract . 11 2.1 Introduction .
    [Show full text]
  • "Eustace the Monk" and Compositional Techniques
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Doctoral Dissertations Graduate School 2013 An original composition, Symphony No. 1, "Eustace the Monk" and compositional techniques used to elicit musical humor Samuel Howard Stokes Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations Part of the Music Commons Recommended Citation Stokes, Samuel Howard, "An original composition, Symphony No. 1, "Eustace the Monk" and compositional techniques used to elicit musical humor" (2013). LSU Doctoral Dissertations. 1053. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations/1053 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized graduate school editor of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please [email protected]. AN ORIGINAL COMPOSITION, SYMPHONY NO. 1, "EUSTACE THE MONK" AND COMPOSITIONAL TECHNIQUES USED TO ELICIT MUSICAL HUMOR A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College In partial fulfillment of the Requirements of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in The School of Music by Samuel Stokes B.M., University of Central Missouri, 2002 M.A., University of Central Missouri, 2005 M.M., The Florida State University, 2006 May 2013 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to thank Dinos Constantinides for his valuable guidance and enthusiasm in my development as a composer. He has expanded my horizons by making me think outside of the box while leaving me enough room to find my own compositional voice.
    [Show full text]
  • Sample Chapter
    01-1253-CH 1 2/5/02 2:30 PM Page 1 A Unique Partnership the u.s.-french relationship is a unique mix of rivalry and cooper- ation. Historical allies and comrades in arms, the United States and France are often fractious and quarrelsome.1 These visions are not irreconcilable, however. Even if a divorce were possible, there would be insufficient grounds to support it. French-American frictions are a staple of trans- atlantic relations, so much so that it is easy to dismiss them as a stylized family feud whose manifestations are tempered by the absence of funda- mental conflict. In our estimation, such a complacent assessment is mis- taken. The fundamental changes that have taken place since 1989 have made tensions more serious because they are not contained by the tight configu- rations of the cold war.2 Differences now have more room to play them- selves out and can have wider repercussions. The tense and often con- tentious duel between Washington and Paris over a wide array of issues—designs for the new security architecture of Europe, for supervising commercial competition, for coping with the conflicts of the former Yugoslavia—all have had meaning and consequence that have gone well beyond the status of their bilateral relationship.3 France’s European challenge to American domination in the early 1990s encapsulated two central issues: how to reconstitute the political space of postcommunist Europe and how to redistribute roles and respon- sibilities in the transatlantic partnership.4 The expression of this ambition in an atmosphere made acrimonious by the clash of national egos gener- ated tensions, though some of these proved eventually to be constructive.
    [Show full text]