Wind in the North Sea. Effects of Offshore Grid Design on Power System Operation

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Wind in the North Sea. Effects of Offshore Grid Design on Power System Operation Wind in the North Sea. Effects of offshore grid design on power system operation. Line Bergfjord Master of Energy and Environmental Engineering Submission date: September 2011 Supervisor: Kjetil Uhlen, ELKRAFT Co-supervisor: Madeleine Gibescu, Delft University of Technology Arjen van der Meer, Delft University of Technology Norwegian University of Science and Technology Department of Electric Power Engineering Acknowledgements First of all I would like to thank my parents for everything they have given me, for all the good times together and for their support in everything I do. I would further like to express my gratitude towards the Electrical Power System group of TUDelft. Even though you were busy, you always had time to help me out and give me advice. I have great respect for your knowledge and work. Especially thanks to my supervisors Madeleine Gibescu and Arjen van der Meer for guidance and support, to Alicja Lojowska for enlighten me on the statistics and mathematics, to Barry Rawn for thoroughly help on the wind data, to Ana Ciupuliga for quick and good answers and to my fellow master graduate students. Thank you all for good times between and during work. Last but not least I would like to thank Marc for always being there for me, for listening to my frustrations and making me look on the bright side of life. Abstract In this thesis a method was developed to evaluate and compare various offshore grid topology and capacity choices. A small power system was created for the purpose of the study, including prototypes of offshore grids. To perform the offshore grid study, preliminary steps had to be taken and four subtasks were thus defined: 1. Develop a scenario of wind park sizes and locations. 2. Obtain representative wind speed data for each of the locations defined. 3. Calculate resulting wind power production, given the scenario and the wind speed data. 4. Study wind power integration and effects of grid topologies. The North Sea was chosen as a starting point and offshore wind power scenarios for the North Sea in 2025 and 2030 were first developed. Choices regarding which wind data to base the study on, i.e. re-analysis data, numerical weather prediction data or synthetic wind speed data, were evaluated. It was chosen for the final analysis to use a relatively high resolution wind speed data set, resulting from metrological data modelling. This wind speed data was then matched with the wind park locations and the wind power production for the North Sea scenario calculated. A multiturbine approach was applied for this conversion from wind speed to wind power. Finally, the resulting wind power could be included in an offshore grid structure and integrated into a power system. A small power system was created including three main generation/ load areas based on the characteristics of the Norwegian, Dutch and the British generation portfolios. These areas where connected with link capacities according to the existing and planned HVDC links between the real countries. Three offshore wind areas where then added, interconnected and connected to their respective countries, creating an offshore grid structure. The benefits of different topologies were then investigated by varying the link capacities off the offshore grid structure. Simulations were performed using a unit commitment and economical dispatch simulation tool. The benefits were mainly evaluated in terms of wind integration, emission reductions and reductions in operational cost. All cases are compared with a base case having only radial connection of the offshore wind clusters. The meshed grid structure results in increased wind integration reduced emission and reduced operational cost for all of the cases. The offshore grid was further found to facilitate both wind integration and trade. Though increasing the rating of the interconnections to shore above the capacity of the connected wind park cluster, as to accommodate for additional trade, was not found to give additional benefits. Regarding the capacities of the interconnections between the wind park clusters, the benefits were seen to saturate at a rating equal to the capacity of the smaller of the two connected wind park clusters. As investment cost was not considered in this thesis II further decisions regarding the optimal rating of the cables were based on the assumption that a high link utilisation is desirable. It is however recommended to apply a cost-benefit analysis for more accurate evaluations. As could be expected the effects on the onshore generation were unevenly distributed among the created areas depending on the generation mix. Finally, it should however be noted that since the case study only included three areas and an un-optimised hydro-scheduling method, results should be treated with caution. III Table of contents List of Tables...................................................................................................................... VII Table of Figures ................................................................................................................ VIII Abbreviations ...................................................................................................................... X 1 Introduction ................................................................................................................ 1 1.1 Background ......................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Scope of the study .............................................................................................. 2 1.2.1 Study framework: the NSTG research project ................................................... 3 1.3 Objective and approach ...................................................................................... 3 1.4 Structure of the report........................................................................................ 5 2 Offshore Wind Scenario .............................................................................................. 6 2.1 Approach ............................................................................................................. 6 2.2 Final North Sea Scenario ..................................................................................... 6 2.2.1 Modifications ..................................................................................................... 6 2.2.2 Comparison of scenarios.................................................................................... 8 2.3 Background scenarios ....................................................................................... 10 2.3.1 4Coffshore Online Wind Park Database .......................................................... 10 2.3.2 National Reports and Plans.............................................................................. 10 2.3.2.1 The Netherlands .................................................................................. 10 2.3.2.2 Great Britain......................................................................................... 12 2.3.2.3 Norway................................................................................................. 12 2.3.2.4 Denmark .............................................................................................. 13 2.3.2.5 Belgium ................................................................................................ 14 2.3.2.6 Germany .............................................................................................. 14 2.3.3 Related reports, studies and research projects ............................................... 16 2.3.3.1 EWEA – “Pure Power”.......................................................................... 16 2.3.3.2 TradeWind ........................................................................................... 16 2.3.3.3 Greenpeace – “A North Sea Electricity Grid *r+evolution” ................. 17 2.3.3.4 OffshoreGrid ........................................................................................ 17 2.3.3.5 ENTSO-E – “Offshore Grid Development in the North Sea”................ 18 2.3.3.6 WINDSPEED ......................................................................................... 18 3 Wind Speed Data ...................................................................................................... 19 3.1 Obtaining Wind Data......................................................................................... 19 3.2 Wind Speed Data in Wind Integration Studies ................................................. 21 3.3 Wind Speed Data in This Study ......................................................................... 21 3.3.1 Data corrections ............................................................................................... 22 3.4 Stochastic wind data modelling ........................................................................ 23 3.4.1 Characteristics of wind speed time series ....................................................... 23 3.4.1.1 Distribution .......................................................................................... 24 3.4.2 Correlation ....................................................................................................... 27 3.5 Method.............................................................................................................. 28 3.5.1 VAR-model ....................................................................................................... 28 IV 3.5.2 Requirements regarding
Recommended publications
  • Modeling and Simulation of an Hvdc Network for Offshore Wind Farms”
    Project Report – Budget TREBALL DE FI DE GRAU “MODELING AND SIMULATION OF AN HVDC NETWORK FOR OFFSHORE WIND FARMS” TFG presentat per optar al títol de GRAU en ENGINYERIA DE L’ENERGIA per Joan-Bartomeu Pons Perelló Barcelona, 09 de Juny de 2015 Director: Arnau Dòria Cerezo Codirector: Sergio Zlotnik Departament d’Enginyeria Elèctrica (EE – 709) Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya (UPC) Project Report “MODELING AND SIMULATION OF AN HVDC NETWORK FOR OFFSHORE WIND FARMS” TFG presentat per optar al títol de GRAU en ENGINYERIA DE L’ENERGIA per Joan-Bartomeu Pons Perelló Barcelona, 09 de Juny de 2015 Director: Arnau Dòria Cerezo Codirector: Sergio Zlotnik Departament d’Enginyeria Elèctrica (EE – 709) Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya (UPC) TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS i List of Figures . iii List of Tables . v Abstract . vii Resum . vii Resumen . vii Chapter 1: Introduction 1 1.1 Aim and goals of this project . 1 1.2 Context and motivation . 1 1.2.1 Wind power and offshore wind farms . 2 1.2.2 HVDC transmission . 4 1.3 Project Report outline . 6 Chapter 2: Modeling of an HVDC network 7 2.1 Analytical model . 7 2.1.1 HVDC lines . 7 2.1.2 Voltage Source Converters . 9 2.1.3 General model . 10 2.1.4 Wind energy conversion model . 11 2.1.5 Control scheme: Droop control . 14 2.2 Case Studies . 16 2.2.1 Case Study 1: 4-terminal, 3-line system . 16 2.2.2 Case Study 2: 5-terminal, 6-line system . 17 2.2.3 Case Study 3: North Sea Transnational Grid .
    [Show full text]
  • Renewable Energy in Small Islands
    Renewable Energy on Small Islands Second edition august 2000 Sponsored by: Renewable Energy on Small Islands Second Edition Author: Thomas Lynge Jensen, Forum for Energy and Development (FED) Layout: GrafiCO/Ole Jensen, +45 35 36 29 43 Cover photos: Upper left: A 55 kW wind turbine of the Danish island of Aeroe. Photo provided by Aeroe Energy and Environmental Office. Middle left: Solar water heaters on the Danish island of Aeroe. Photo provided by Aeroe Energy and Environmental Office. Upper right: Photovoltaic installation on Marie Galante Island, Guadeloupe, French West Indies. Photo provided by ADEME Guadeloupe. Middle right: Waiah hydropower plant on Hawaii-island. Photo provided by Energy, Resource & Technology Division, State of Hawaii, USA Lower right: Four 60 kW VERGNET wind turbines on Marie Galante Island, Guadeloupe, French West Indies. Photo provided by ADEME Guadeloupe. Printing: Vesterkopi Printing cover; Green Graphic No. printed: 200 ISBN: 87-90502-03-5 Copyright (c) 2000 by Forum for Energy and Development (FED) Feel free to use the information in the report, but please state the source. Renewable Energy on Small Islands – Second Edition August 2000 Table of Contents Table of Contents Foreword and Acknowledgements by the Author i Introduction iii Executive Summary v 1. The North Atlantic Ocean Azores (Portugal) 1 Canary Island (Spain) 5 Cape Verde 9 Faeroe Islands (Denmark) 11 Madeira (Portugal) 13 Pellworm (Germany) 17 St. Pierre and Miquelon (France) 19 2. The South Atlantic Ocean Ascension Island (UK) 21 St. Helena Island (UK) 23 3. The Baltic Sea Aeroe (Denmark) 25 Gotland (Sweden) 31 Samsoe (Denmark) 35 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Renewable Generation Data for European Energy System Analysis
    Renewable Generation Data for European Energy System Analysis Alexander Kies1, Bruno U. Schyska2, Mariia Bilousova1;3, Omar El Sayed1;3, Jakub Jurasz4;5;6, Horst Stoecker1;3;7 1Frankfurt Institute for Advanced Studies, Goethe-University Frankfurt, Ruth-Moufang-Str. 1, 60438 Frankfurt, Germany 2German Aerospace Center (DLR), Institute of Networked Energy Systems, Carl-von-Ossietzky-Straße 15, 26129 Oldenburg, Germany 3Goethe-University, Frankfurt, Germany 4Faculty of Environmental Engineering, Wroclaw University of Science and Technology, 50-370 Wroclaw, Poland 5Faculty of Management, AGH University, 30-059 Cracow, Poland 6School of Business, Society and Engineering, M¨alardalens H¨ogskola,72113 V¨aster˚as, Sweden 7GSI Helmholtzzentrum f¨urSchwerionenforschung, Planckstraße 1, 64291 Darmstadt, Germany Abstract In the process of decarbonization, the global energy mix is shifting from fossil fuels to renewables. To study decarbonization pathways, large-scale energy system models are utilized. These models require accurate data on renewable generation to develop their full potential. Using different data can lead to conflicting results and policy advice. In this work, we compare several datasets that are commonly used to study the transition towards highly renewable European power system. We find significant differences between these datasets and cost-difference of about 10% result in the different energy mix. We conclude that much more attention must be paid to the large uncertainties of the input data. Keywords: Energy System Analysis, Renewable Generation Data, Energy arXiv:2101.08741v1 [physics.soc-ph] 21 Jan 2021 Meteorology, MERRA-2, ERA5, renewables.ninja, EMHires Preprint submitted to Journal Name January 22, 2021 1. Introduction Sustainable energy sources are a major solution for the imminent thread of climate change [1, 2].
    [Show full text]
  • Power and Wind Shear Implications of Large Wind Turbine Scenarios in the US Central Plains
    energies Article Power and Wind Shear Implications of Large Wind Turbine Scenarios in the US Central Plains Rebecca J. Barthelmie 1,* , Tristan J. Shepherd 2 , Jeanie A. Aird 1 and Sara C. Pryor 2 1 Sibley School of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA; [email protected] 2 Department of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA; [email protected] (T.J.S.); [email protected] (S.C.P.) * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 13 July 2020; Accepted: 11 August 2020; Published: 18 August 2020 Abstract: Continued growth of wind turbine physical dimensions is examined in terms of the implications for wind speed, power and shear across the rotor plane. High-resolution simulations with the Weather Research and Forecasting model are used to generate statistics of wind speed profiles for scenarios of current and future wind turbines. The nine-month simulations, focused on the eastern Central Plains, show that the power scales broadly as expected with the increase in rotor diameter (D) and wind speeds at hub-height (H). Increasing wind turbine dimensions from current values (approximately H = 100 m, D = 100 m) to those of the new International Energy Agency reference wind turbine (H = 150 m, D = 240 m), the power across the rotor plane increases 7.1 times. The mean domain-wide wind shear exponent (α) decreases from 0.21 (H = 100 m, D = 100 m) to 0.19 for the largest wind turbine scenario considered (H = 168 m, D = 248 m) and the frequency of extreme positive shear (α > 0.2) declines from 48% to 38% of 10-min periods.
    [Show full text]
  • EWEA Offshore Report 2009
    Oceans of Opportunity Harnessing Europe’s largest domestic energy resource A report by the European Wind Energy Association Oceans of opportunity Europe’s offshore wind potential is enormous and able to power Europe seven times over. Huge developer interest Over 100 GW of offshore wind projects are already in various stages of planning. If realised, these projects would produce 10% of the EU’s electricity whilst avoiding 200 million tonnes of CO2 emissions each year. Repeating the onshore success EWEA has a target of 40 GW of offshore wind in the EU by 2020, implying an average annual market growth of 28% over the coming 12 years. The EU market for onshore wind grew by an average 32% per year in the 12-year period from 1992-2004 – what the wind energy industry Oceans of Opportunity has achieved on land can be repeated at sea. Building the offshore grid EWEA’s proposed offshore grid builds on the 11 offshore grids currently operating and 21 offshore grids currently being considered by the grid operators in the Baltic and North Seas to give Europe a truly pan-European electricity super highway. Realising the potential Strong political support and action from Europe’s policy-makers will allow a new, multi-billion euro industry to be built. EWEA Results that speak for themselves This new industry will deliver thousands of green collar jobs and a new About EWEA renewable energy economy and establish Europe as world leader in EWEA is the voice of the wind industry, actively promoting the utilisation of offshore wind power technology.
    [Show full text]
  • Integration of Wave and Offshore Wind Energy in a European Offshore Grid
    Aalborg Universitet Integration of Wave and Offshore Wind Energy in a European Offshore Grid Chozas, Julia Fernandez; Sørensen, H. C.; Korpås, M. Published in: Proceedings of the Twentieth (2010) International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference Publication date: 2010 Document Version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Link to publication from Aalborg University Citation for published version (APA): Chozas, J. F., Sørensen, H. C., & Korpås, M. (2010). Integration of Wave and Offshore Wind Energy in a European Offshore Grid. In Proceedings of the Twentieth (2010) International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference: Beijing, China, June 20-25, 2010 (Vol. I, pp. 926-933). International Society of Offshore & Polar Engineers. International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference Proceedings Vol. 20 General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. ? Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. ? You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain ? You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal ? Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us at [email protected] providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Downloaded from vbn.aau.dk on: September 24, 2021 Proceedings of the Twentieth (2010) International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference Beijing, China, June 2025, 2010 Copyright © 2010 by The International Society of Offshore and Polar Engineers (ISOPE) ISBN 978-1-880653-77-7 (Set); ISSN 1098-6189 (Set); www.isope.org Integration of Wave and Offshore Wind Energy in a European Offshore Grid J.
    [Show full text]
  • 3.8.5.Post0+Ug.Gdd887c5.D20201118
    InVEST User’s Guide, Release 3.8.5.post0+ug.gdd887c5.d20201118 InVEST User’s Guide Integrated Valuation of Ecosystem Services and Tradeoffs Version 3.8.5.post0+ug.gdd887c5.d20201118 Editors: Richard Sharp, James Douglass, Stacie Wolny. Contributing Authors: Katie Arkema, Joey Bernhardt, Will Bierbower, Nicholas Chaumont, Douglas Denu, James Douglass, David Fisher, Kathryn Glowinski, Robert Griffin, Gregory Guannel, Anne Guerry, Justin Johnson, Perrine Hamel, Christina Kennedy, Chong-Ki Kim, Martin Lacayo, Eric Lonsdorf, Lisa Mandle, Lauren Rogers, Richard Sharp, Jodie Toft, Gregory Verutes, Adrian L. Vogl, Stacie Wolny, Spencer Wood. Citation: Sharp, R., Douglass, J., Wolny, S., Arkema, K., Bernhardt, J., Bierbower, W., Chaumont, N., Denu, D., Fisher, D., Glowinski, K., Griffin, R., Guannel, G., Guerry, A., Johnson, J., Hamel, P., Kennedy, C., Kim, C.K., Lacayo, M., Lonsdorf, E., Mandle, L., Rogers, L., Toft, J., Verutes, G., Vogl, A. L., and Wood, S. 2020, InVEST 3.8.5.post0+ug.gdd887c5.d20201118 User’s Guide. The Natural Capital Project, Stanford University, University of Minnesota, The Nature Conservancy, and World Wildlife Fund. 1 InVEST User’s Guide, Release 3.8.5.post0+ug.gdd887c5.d20201118 2 CONTENTS 1 Introduction 5 1.1 Data Requirements and Outputs Summary Table............................5 1.2 Why we need tools to map and value ecosystem services........................5 1.2.1 Introduction...........................................5 1.2.2 Who should use InVEST?...................................5 1.2.3 Introduction to InVEST..................................... 10 1.2.4 Using InVEST to Inform Decisions.............................. 12 1.2.5 A work in progress....................................... 15 1.2.6 This guide............................................ 15 1.3 Getting Started.............................................
    [Show full text]
  • Energy Infrastructure
    MJ-30-10-705- EN -C Energy infrastructure PRIORITIES FOR 2020 AND BEYOND ─ A BLUEPRINT FOR AN INTEGRATED EUROPEAN ENERGY NETWORK Energy infrastructure PRIORITIES FOR 2020 AND BEYOND ─ A BLUEPRINT FOR AN INTEGRATED EUROPEAN ENERGY NETWORK This illustrated brochure comprises the text of the European Commission’s communication ‘Energy infrastructure priorities for 2020 and beyond — A Blueprint for an integrated European energy network’ (COM(2010) 677 final of 17 November 2010) and a foreword by Commissioner Günther Oettinger. Europe Direct is a service to help you find answers to your questions about the European Union Freephone number (*): 00 800 6 7 8 9 10 11 (*) Certain mobile telephone operators do not allow access to 00 800 numbers or these calls may be billed. More information on the European Union is available on the Internet (http://europa.eu). Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2011 ISBN 978-92-79-18877-0 doi:10.2833/78572 © European Union, 2011 Reproduction is authorised provided the source is acknowledged. Photos courtesy of: European Commission; European Parliament; iStockphoto; Patrick Mascart/European Commission; Shutterstock; Siemens/EWEA. Printed in Belgium FOREWORD Europe is at an unprecedented crossroads for its energy future. We are currently going through a paradigm shift in the way we produce, transmit, distribute and trade energy, as we try to reduce the carbon footprint of the energy sector as a whole. This shift will increase the role of electricity compared to other energy vectors. We will have to get the most promising renewable energy sources where they are, while further integrating the European energy market.
    [Show full text]
  • Expansion Planning of the North Sea Offshore Grid: Simulation of Integrated Governance Constraints
    Energy Economics 72 (2018) 376–392 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Energy Economics journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/eneeco Expansion planning of the North Sea offshore grid: Simulation of integrated governance constraints João Gorenstein Dedecca a,⁎, Sara Lumbreras b, Andrés Ramos b,RudiA.Hakvoorta, Paulien M. Herder a a Faculty of Technology, Policy and Management, Delft University of Technology, Jaffalaan 5, 2628BX Delft, The Netherlands b Institute for Research in Technology, Comillas Pontifical University, Santa Cruz de Marcenado 26, 28015 Madrid, Spain article info abstract Article history: The development of offshore transmission and wind power generation in the North Sea of Europe is advancing Received 15 October 2017 fast, but there are significant barriers to an integrated offshore grid in the region. This offshore grid is a multi- Received in revised form 18 April 2018 level, multi-actor system requiring a governance decision-making approach, but there is currently no proven Accepted 23 April 2018 governance framework for it, or for the expansion planning of the European power system in general. In addition, Available online 25 April 2018 existing offshore expansion planning models do not endogenously include governance considerations, such as JEL classification: country vetoes to integrated lines. We develop a myopic Mixed-Integer Linear Programming model of offshore C63 generation and transmission expansion planning to study the effect of integrated governance constraints. D7 These constraints limit investments in integrated lines: non-conventional lines linking offshore wind farms to L5 other countries or to other farms. Each constraint affects the system (including the main transmission corridors), L94 transmission technologies and welfare distribution differently.
    [Show full text]
  • Wind Power Prediction Model Based on Publicly Available Data: Sensitivity Analysis on Roughness and Production Trend
    WIND POWER PREDICTION MODEL BASED ON PUBLICLY AVAILABLE DATA: SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS ON ROUGHNESS AND PRODUCTION TREND Dissertation in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE WITH A MAJOR IN WIND POWER PROJECT MANAGEMENT Uppsala University Campus Gotland Department of Earth Sciences Gireesh Sakthi [10th December, 2019] WIND POWER PREDICTION MODEL BASED ON PUBLICLY AVAILABLE DATA: SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS ON ROUGHNESS AND PRODUCTION TREND Dissertation in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE WITH A MAJOR IN WIND POWER PROJECT MANAGEMENT Uppsala University Campus Gotland Department of Earth Sciences Approved by Supervisor, Dr. Karl Nilsson Examiner, Dr. Stefan Ivanell 10th December, 2019 II Abstract The wind power prediction plays a vital role in a wind power project both during the planning and operational phase of a project. A time series based wind power prediction model is introduced and the simulations are run for different case studies. The prediction model works based on the input from 1) nearby representative wind measuring station 2) Global average wind speed value from Meteorological Institute Uppsala University mesoscale model (MIUU) 3) Power curve of the wind turbine. The measured wind data is normalized to minimize the variation in the wind speed and multiplied with the MIUU to get a distributed wind speed. The distributed wind speed is then used to interpolate the wind power with the help of the power curve of the wind turbine. The interpolated wind power is then compared with the Actual Production Data (APD) to validate the prediction model. The simulation results show that the model works fairly predicting the Annual Energy Production (AEP) on monthly averages for all sites but the model could not follow the APD trend on all cases.
    [Show full text]
  • Commission Staff Working Document Impact Assessment Accompanying the Document Communication from the Commission to the European
    COUNCIL OF Brussels, 21 January 2014 THE EUROPEAN UNION 5526/14 ADD 2 ENER 19 RECH 24 ENV 48 COVER NOTE from: Secretary-General of the European Commission, signed by Mr Jordi AYET PUIGARNAU, Director date of receipt: 20 January 2014 to: Mr Uwe CORSEPIUS, Secretary-General of the Council of the European Union No Cion doc.: SWD(2014) 13 final Subject: Commission Staff Working Document Impact Assessment Accompanying the document Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions Ocean Energy Action needed to deliver on the potential of ocean energy in European seas and oceans by 2020 and beyond Delegations will find attached Commission document SWD(2014) 13 final. ________________________ Encl.: SWD(2014) 13 final 5526/14 ADD 2 JPD/st 1 DG E EN EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 20.1.2014 SWD(2014) 13 final COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT IMPACT ASSESSMENT Accompanying the document Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions Ocean Energy Action needed to deliver on the potential of ocean energy by 2020 and beyond {COM(2014) 8 final} {SWD(2014) 12 final} EN EN TABLE OF CONTENTS COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT IMPACT ASSESSMENT ......................... 1. Introduction .................................................................................................................. 5 2. Procedural Issues and Consultation of Interested Parties
    [Show full text]
  • TEN-E Financed Projects 1995-2013 for Europa.Xls P Rojec T Referenc E Dec Is Ion 2006 Guidelines Referenc E P Rojec T P Riority
    2013 TEN-E financed projects 1995-2013 for Europa.xls Member Company Description State(s) Decision Priority axe Priority Project reference Project Project priority (*) priority Project Financing by TEN Financing 2006 guidelines reference2006 guidelines E341/13 13-E341/13EL.9 PEI EL.9 IT DII GmbH 206.225 € (GERMANY) + Feasibility study on a submarine electricity interconnection between Italy and North EuropaGrid Africa (Algeria, Tunisia, Libya) for the exchange of renewable electricity between Transmission Europe and North Africa Services Ltd (IRELAND) E344/13 13-E344 EL.7 PEI EL.7 DK Energinet 1.100.000 € Kasso-Tjele Monopiles (DENMARK) E345/13 13-E345 2.23 PCI, PEI DK Energinet 400.000 € Oresund - two new 132 kV interconnectors from Denmark to Sweden (DENMARK) E346/13 13-E346 EL.7 PEI EL.7 DK Energinet 1.100.000 € Synchronous condensers in Fraugde and Herslev (DENMARK) E348/13 13-E348 4.1 PCI IT Feasibility study for a new electrical interconnection through the northern cross border 251.910 € CIE, CVA, SAV, between Italy and Switzerland, by means of the under-construction Gran San Bernardo SITRASB (ITALY) safety gallery and existing highway infrastructures E351/13 13-E351 3.55 PCI BE ELIA Asset 2.000.000 € Offshore Grid and Interconnection Enabler: Stevin Project (BELGIUM) E352/13 13-E352 EL.7 PEI EL.7 LT LITGRID AB Oversight of design and build contract of HVDC back-to-back station interconnecting 50.000 € (LITHUANIA) Lithuanian and Polish power grids in LitPol Link Project E353/13 13-E353 EL.8 PEI EL.8 SK Slovenska 2.338.779 € elektrizacna
    [Show full text]