Managing Spinal Injuries in Critical Care (SIA)
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
International Journal of Pharmtech Research CODEN (USA): IJPRIF, ISSN: 0974-4304, ISSN(Online): 2455-9563 Vol.13, No.01, Pp 20-25, 2020
International Journal of PharmTech Research CODEN (USA): IJPRIF, ISSN: 0974-4304, ISSN(Online): 2455-9563 Vol.13, No.01, pp 20-25, 2020 Comparison of Post-Operative Clinical Outcome of Patients with PosteriorInstrumentation After Spinal Cord Injury in Thoracic, Thoracolumbar, and Lumbar Region at Haji Adam Malik General Hospital, Medan from 2016 to 2018 Budi Achmad M. Siregar1*, Pranajaya Dharma Kadar2, Aga Shahri Putera Ketaren3 1Resident of Orthopaedic and Traumatology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Sumatera Utara / Haji Adam Malik General Hospital, Medan, Indonesia 2Consultant Orthopaedic and Traumatology, Spine Division, Faculty of Medicine, University of Sumatera Utara / Haji Adam Malik General Hospital, Medan, Indonesia 3Consultant Orthopaedic and Traumatology, Upper Extremity Division,Faculty of Medicine, University of Sumatera Utara / Haji Adam MalikGeneral Hospital, Medan , Indonesia Abstract : Introduction : Spinal cord injury is a damaging situation related to severe disability and death after trauma.And the term spinal cord injury refers to damage of the spinal cord resulting from trauma. Spinal injuries treatment is still in debate for some cases, whether using conservative or surgical methods. Material and Methods : The study was a retrospective, unpaired observational analytic study with a cross- sectional approach. It was conducted at Haji Adam Malik General Hospital, Medan from January 2016 to December 2018. Clinical outcome of patientswere calculated using SF 36, ODI, and VAS.Data would be tested using the Saphiro-Wilk test. We were using the significance level of 1% (0.01) and the relative significance level of 10% (0.1). Results : Clinical outcomes of patients with spinal cord injuries before posterior instrumentation rated using ODI and VAS were 75.93±6.75 and 4.75±0.98 respectively. -
Missed Spinal Lesions in Traumatized Patients Ana M Cerván De La Haba*, Miguel Rodríguez Solera J, Miguel S Hirschfeld León and Enrique Guerado Parra
de la Haba et al. Trauma Cases Rev 2016, 2:027 Volume 2 | Issue 1 ISSN: 2469-5777 Trauma Cases and Reviews Case Series: Open Access Missed Spinal Lesions in Traumatized Patients Ana M Cerván de la Haba*, Miguel Rodríguez Solera J, Miguel S Hirschfeld León and Enrique Guerado Parra Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Traumatology and Rehabilitation, Hospital Universitario Costa del Sol. University of Malaga, Spain *Corresponding author: Ana M Cerván de la Haba, Hospital Universitario Costa del Sol, Autovía A7 km 187 C.P. 29603, Marbella, Spain, Tel: 951976224, E-mail: [email protected] will help in decreasing the number of missed spinal injuries, being Abstract claim that standardized tertiary trauma survey is vitally important Overlooked spinal injuries and delayed diagnosis are still common in the detection of clinically significant missed injuries and should in traumatized patients. The management of trauma patients is one be included in trauma care, our misdiagnosis occurs at first or later of the most important challenges for the specialist in trauma. Proper examinations [3]. However despite even a third survey still many training and early suspicion of this lesion are of overwhelming injuries are overlooked [4,5]. importance. The damage control orthopaedics, diagnosis and treatment In this paper based on the case method, we discuss the diagnosis algorithm applied to multitrauma patients reduces both morbidity of missable spinal fractures within several traumatic settings. and mortality in polytrauma patients due to missed lesions. Algorithm on its diagnosis and after on its treatment is necessary Case Studies in order to decrease complications. Despite application of care protocols for trauma patients still exist missed spinal injuries. -
The Athlete's Concussion Epidemic
Lindenwood University Digital Commons@Lindenwood University Theses Theses & Dissertations Spring 5-2020 The Athlete’s Concussion Epidemic Andrew James Marsh Lindenwood University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lindenwood.edu/theses Part of the Arts and Humanities Commons Recommended Citation Marsh, Andrew James, "The Athlete’s Concussion Epidemic" (2020). Theses. 17. https://digitalcommons.lindenwood.edu/theses/17 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses & Dissertations at Digital Commons@Lindenwood University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons@Lindenwood University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. !1 THE ATHLETE’S CONCUSSION EPIDEMIC by Andrew Marsh Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts in Mass Communication at Lindenwood University © May 2020, Andrew James Marsh The author hereby grants Lindenwood University permission to reproduce and to distribute publicly paper and electronic thesis copies of document in whole or in part in any medium now known or hereafter created. !2 THE ATHLETE’S CONCUSSION EPIDEMIC A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of the Broadcast and Media Operations for the School of Arts, Media, and Communications Department in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts at Lindenwood University By Andrew James Marsh Saint Charles, Missouri May 2020 !3 ABSTRACT Title of Thesis: The Athlete’s Concussion Epidemic Andrew Marsh, Master of Arts/Mass Communication, 2020 Thesis Directed by: Mike Wall, Director of Broadcast and Media Operations for the School of Arts, Media, and Communications The main goal of this project is to inform and educate you on the various threads concerning concussions in the world of sports. -
International Association of Dental Traumatology Guidelines for the Management of Traumatic Dental Injuries: 3
ENDORSEMENTS: INJURIES IN PRIMARY DENTITION International Association of Dental Traumatology Guidelines for the Management of Traumatic Dental Injuries: 3. Injuries in the Primary Dentition Endorsed by the American Academy + How to Cite: Day PF, Flores MT, O’Connell AC, et al. International of Pediatric Dentistry Association of Dental Traumatology guidelines for the management of traumatic dental injuries: 3. Injuries in the primary dentition. 2020 Dent Traumatol 2020;36:343-359. https://doi.org/10.1111/edt.12576. Authors Peter F. Day1 • Marie Therese Flores2 • Anne C. O’Connell3 • Paul V. Abbott4 • Georgios Tsilingaridis5,6 Ashraf F. Fouad7 • Nestor Cohenca8 • Eva Lauridsen9 • Cecilia Bourguignon10 • Lamar Hicks11 • Jens Ove Andreasen12 • Zafer C. Cehreli13 • Stephen Harlamb14 • Bill Kahler15 • Adeleke Oginni16 • Marc Semper17 • Liran Levin18 Abstract Traumatic injuries to the primary dentition present special problems that often require far different management when compared to that used for the permanent dentition. The International Association of Dental Traumatology (IADT) has developed these Guidelines as a con- sensus statement after a comprehensive review of the dental literature and working group discussions. Experienced researchers and clinicians from various specialties and the general dentistry community were included in the working group. In cases where the published data did not appear conclusive, recommendations were based on the consensus opinions or majority decisions of the working group. They were then reviewed and approved by the members of the IADT Board of Directors. The primary goal of these Guidelines is to provide clinicians with an approach for the immediate or urgent care of primary teeth injuries based on the best evidence provided by the literature and expert opinions. -
Chinese Expert Consensus on Echelons Treatment of Thoracic
Zong et al. Military Medical Research (2018) 5:34 https://doi.org/10.1186/s40779-018-0181-6 POSITION ARTICLE AND GUIDELINES Open Access Chinese expert consensus on echelons treatment of thoracic injury in modern warfare Zhao-Wen Zong1*, Zhi-Nong Wang2, Si-Xu Chen1, Hao Qin1, Lian-Yang Zhang3, Yue Shen3, Lei Yang1, Wen-Qiong Du1, Can Chen1, Xin Zhong1, Lin Zhang4, Jiang-Tao Huo4, Li-Ping Kuai5, Li-Xin Shu6, Guo-Fu Du5, Yu-Feng Zhao3 and Representing the Traumatology Branch of the China Medical Rescue Association, the Youth Committee on Traumatology Branch of the Chinese Medical Association, the PLA Professional Committee and the Youth Committee on Disaster Medicine, and the Disaster Medicine Branch of the Chongqing Association of Integrative Medicine Abstract The emergency treatment of thoracic injuries varies of general conditions and modern warfare. However, there are no unified battlefield treatment guidelines for thoracic injuries in the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA). An expert consensus has been reached based on the epidemiology of thoracic injuries and the concept of battlefield treatment combined with the existing levels of military medical care in modern warfare. Since there are no differences in the specialized treatment for thoracic injuries between general conditions and modern warfare, first aid, emergency treatment, and early treatment of thoracic injuries are introduced separately in three levels in this consensus. At Level I facilities, tension pneumothorax and open pneumothorax are recommended for initial assessment during the first aid stage. Re-evaluation and further treatment for hemothorax, flail chest, and pericardial tamponade are recommended at Level II facilities. -
The European Perspective on the Management of Acute Major Hemorrhage and Coagulopathy After Trauma: Summary of the 2019 Updated European Guideline
Journal of Clinical Medicine Article The European Perspective on the Management of Acute Major Hemorrhage and Coagulopathy after Trauma: Summary of the 2019 Updated European Guideline Marc Maegele Department of Traumatology and Orthopedic Surgery, Cologne-Merheim Medical Center (CMMC), Institute for Research in Operative Medicine (IFOM), University Witten-Herdecke, D-51109 Cologne, Germany; [email protected]; Tel.: +49-(0)-221-89-07-13-614; Fax: +49-(0)-221-89-07-30-85 Abstract: Non-controlled hemorrhage with accompanying trauma-induced coagulopathy (TIC) remains the most common cause of preventable death after multiple injury. Rapid identification followed by aggressive treatment is the key for improved outcomes. Treatment of trauma hemorrhage begins at the scene, with manual compression, the use of tourniquets and (non) commercial pelvic slings, and rapid transfer to an adequate trauma center. Upon hospital admission, coagulation monitoring and support are to be initiated immediately. Bleeding is controlled surgically following damage control principles. Modern coagulation management includes goal-oriented, individualized therapies, guided by point-of-care viscoelastic assays. Idarucizumab can be used as an antidote to the thrombin inhibitor dabigatran, andexanet alpha as an antidote to factor Xa inhibitors. This review summarizes the key recommendations of the 2019 updated European guideline on the management of major bleeding and coagulopathy following trauma. These evidence-based recommendations may form the backbone of algorithms adapted to local logistics and infrastructure. Keywords: trauma; hemorrhage; coagulopathgy; guideline Citation: Maegele, M. The European Perspective on the Management of Acute Major Hemorrhage and Coagulopathy after Trauma: 1. Introduction Summary of the 2019 Updated Despite significant improvements in acute trauma care, uncontrolled hemorrhage European Guideline. -
EMS Spinal Precautions and the Use of the Long Backboard
EMS SPINAL PRECAUTIONS AND THE USE OF THE LONG BACKBOARD – RESOURCE DOCUMENT TO THE POSITION STATEMENT OF THE NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF EMS PHYSICIANS AND THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS COMMITTEE ON TRAUMA Chelsea C. White IV, MD, EMT-P, Robert M. Domeier, MD, Michael G. Millin, MD, MPH, and the Standards and Clinical Practice Committee, National Association of EMS Physicians ABSTRACT designed to guide practitioners in understanding of the new position statement. Each item in the position Field spinal immobilization using a backboard and cervical is quoted and followed by a discussion and a review collar has been standard practice for patients with suspected spine injury since the 1960s. The backboard has been a com- of the literature. ponent of field spinal immobilization despite lack of effi- cacy evidence. While the backboard is a useful spinal protec- • “Long backboards are commonly used to attempt tion tool during extrication, use of backboards is not without to provide rigid spinal immobilization among EMS risk, as they have been shown to cause respiratory compro- trauma patients. However, the benefit of long back- mise, pain, and pressure sores. Backboards also alter a pa- boards is largely unproven.” tient’s physical exam, resulting in unnecessary radiographs. Because backboards present known risks, and their value in protecting the spinal cord of an injured patient remains HISTORY OF THE BACKBOARD unsubstantiated, they should only be used judiciously. The following provides a discussion of the elements of the Na- Field spinal immobilization using a cervical collar and tional Association of EMS Physicians (NAEMSP) and Amer- a backboard has been standard practice for patients ican College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma (ACS-COT) with suspected spine injury since the 1960s. -
Protocols, Most Care Is Done by Standing Order Within Your Scope of Practice
ABDOMINAL PAIN 12/03/2013 Follow Assessment, General Procedures Protocol EMR • Assess and support ABCs • Position of comfort • Supine if: • Trauma • Hypotension • Syncope • NPO • Monitor vital signs • Oxygen indicated for: • Unstable vitals • Severity of pain • Suspected GI bleed EMT • 12-lead – See ECG/12 Lead A-EMT • IV – NS with standard tubing • Titrate fluid to patient’s needs – See Shock Protocol EMT-I/ • Cardiac monitoring PARAMEDIC • Pain management – See Acute Pain Management Protocol ACUTE NAUSEA AND VOMITING 12/03/2013 Follow Assessment, General Procedures Protocol Every effort should be made to transport patients that: • Have been vomiting > 6 hours • Show significant signs of dehydration (e.g. tachycardia, hypotension) • Significant abdominal pain • Patients at the extremes of age <5 or >55 • Patients with cardiac history • Patients with a chronic medical condition are especially vulnerable to serious problems associated with prolonged vomiting EMR/EMT • Assess and support ABCs • Position of comfort • Monitor vital signs • Administer oxygen if indicated • Use caution when using a mask EMT • Consider obtaining 12 Lead - See ECG/12 Lead • Check CBG A-EMT • IV – NS with standard tubing • Fluid challenge, titrate fluid to patient’s needs– See Shock Protocol EMT-I • Zofran PARAMEDIC • Inapsine (2nd Line) • Compazine (2nd Line) • Phenergan (2nd Line) ACUTE PAIN MANAGEMENT 02/03/2020 Follow Assessment, General Procedures Protocol Consider administering analgesic medication in the management of any acutely painful condition relating to either trauma or medical causes. The single most reliable indicator of the existence/intensity of acute pain is the patient’s self-report. Most people who suffer pain show it, either by verbal complaint or nonverbal behaviors. -
Medical Treatment Guidelines (MTG)
Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder and Acute Stress Disorder Effective: November 1, 2021 Adapted by NYS Workers’ Compensation Board (“WCB”) from MDGuidelines® with permission of Reed Group, Ltd. (“ReedGroup”), which is not responsible for WCB’s modifications. MDGuidelines® are Copyright 2019 Reed Group, Ltd. All Rights Reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, displayed, disseminated, modified, or incorporated in any form without prior written permission from ReedGroup and WCB. Notwithstanding the foregoing, this publication may be viewed and printed solely for internal use as a reference, including to assist in compliance with WCL Sec. 13-0 and 12 NYCRR Part 44[0], provided that (i) users shall not sell or distribute, display, or otherwise provide such copies to others or otherwise commercially exploit the material. Commercial licenses, which provide access to the online text-searchable version of MDGuidelines®, are available from ReedGroup at www.mdguidelines.com. Contributors The NYS Workers’ Compensation Board would like to thank the members of the New York Workers’ Compensation Board Medical Advisory Committee (MAC). The MAC served as the Board’s advisory body to adapt the American College of Occupational and Environmental Medicine (ACOEM) Practice Guidelines to a New York version of the Medical Treatment Guidelines (MTG). In this capacity, the MAC provided valuable input and made recommendations to help guide the final version of these Guidelines. With full consensus reached on many topics, and a careful review of any dissenting opinions on others, the Board established the final product. New York State Workers’ Compensation Board Medical Advisory Committee Christopher A. Burke, MD , FAPM Attending Physician, Long Island Jewish Medical Center, Northwell Health Assistant Clinical Professor, Hofstra Medical School Joseph Canovas, Esq. -
Comparing the Short-Term Outcome After Polytrauma and Proximal Femur Fracture in Geriatric Patients
Journal of Clinical Medicine Article Comparing the Short-Term Outcome after Polytrauma and Proximal Femur Fracture in Geriatric Patients Andreas Gather, Tomoko Tajima-Schneider, Paul A. Grützner and Matthias Münzberg * Clinic for Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, BG Trauma Center Ludwigshafen, University of Heidelberg, Ludwig-Guttmann-Str. 13, 67071 Ludwigshafen on the Rhine, Germany; [email protected] (A.G.); [email protected] (T.T.-S.); [email protected] (P.A.G.) * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +49-62-168-100; Fax: +49-621-6810-2600 Abstract: Because of demographic change, geriatric patients are becoming a major challenge for traumatology. Multiple trauma patients and patients with proximal femoral fractures are important groups of patients in geriatric traumatology. This retrospective study compares two patient groups with different severities of injuries, and analyzes their patient characteristics and short-term outcomes, focusing on functionality upon discharge. The investigation aims to present the characterizing features of both patient groups, and to identify the potential risk factors for early functionality after trauma. The patient collective comprises two patient groups: a polytrauma group with 91 patients, and a femoral fracture group with 132 patients. Under the control of potential influencing factors, the present study showed no significant influence of belonging to either of the patient groups (multiple trauma or proximal femoral fracture) on the mobility status at discharge. Age, known dementia, pre-clinical intubation, and the lowest Hb value were identified as significant influencing factors. Citation: Gather, A.; Tajima-Schneider, T.; Grützner, P.A.; Despite their old age and vulnerability, the majority of geriatric patients survive accidents. -
Spinal Care REGION 11 Section: Trauma CHICAGO EMS SYSTEM Approved: EMS Medical Directors Consortium PROTOCOL Effective: September 15, 2020
Title: Spinal Care REGION 11 Section: Trauma CHICAGO EMS SYSTEM Approved: EMS Medical Directors Consortium PROTOCOL Effective: September 15, 2020 SPINAL CARE I. PATIENT CARE GOALS 1. Select patients for whom spinal motion restriction (SMR) is indicated. 2. Minimize secondary injury to spine in patients who have, or may have, an unstable spinal injury. 3. Minimize patient morbidity from the use of immobilization devices. 4. Spinal Motion Restriction (SMR) is defined as attempting to maintain the head, neck, and torso in anatomic alignment and independent from device use. II. PATIENT MANAGEMENT A. Assessment 1. Assess the scene to determine the mechanism of injury. a. High risk mechanisms: i. Motor vehicle crashes (including automobiles, all-terrain vehicles, and snowmobiles) ii. Axial loading injuries to the spine (large load falls vertically on the head or a patient lands on top of their head) iii. Falls greater than 10 feet 2. Assess the patient in the position found for findings associated with spine injury: a. Altered Mental Status b. Neurologic deficits c. Neck or back pain or tenderness d. Any evidence of intoxication e. Other severe injuries, particularly associated torso injuries B. Treatment and Interventions 1. Place patient in cervical collar and initiate Spinal Motion Restriction (SMR) if there are any of the following: a. Patient complains of midline neck or spine pain b. Any midline neck or spine tenderness with palpation c. Any abnormal mental status (including extreme agitation) d. Focal or neurologic deficit e. Any evidence of alcohol or drug intoxication f. Another severe or painful distracting injury is present 1 Title: Spinal Care REGION 11 Section: Trauma CHICAGO EMS SYSTEM Approved: EMS Medical Directors Consortium PROTOCOL Effective: September 15, 2020 g. -
Emergency Thoracotomy for Blunt Thoracic Trauma Article
Original Emergency Thoracotomy for Blunt Thoracic Trauma Article Mehmet Erkan Balkan, MD,1 Gürsel Levent Oktar, MD,2 Ayten Kayı-Cangır, MD,2 and Emin Göksel Ergül, MD2 Objectives: The indications for emergency thoracotomy are controversial for blunt trauma. The best results were seen in those patients who were stable enough to undergo thoracotomy in the operating theatre and survived the operation. Methods: The hospital records of 29 patients who underwent emergency thoracotomy for blunt thoracic trauma were reviewed. Results: Of 964 patients with thoracic trauma, 745 (77.3%) sustained blunt injury and 29 of these patients (3.9%) required emergency thoracotomy. Six patients underwent emergency department thoracotomy for blunt cardiac trauma and only one of them survived (16.7%). Of the 23 patients who had emergency thoracotomy at the operating theatre, 2 died in the early postoperative period due to pulmonary embolism (8.7%) and 21 of them survived (91.3%). Conclusion: The results of emergency department thoracotomy in our series were extremely poor compared with the results of other reports, mainly due to rapid deterioration of hemo- dynamic condition caused by severe cardiac injury. The outcome from emergency thorac- otomy in the operating theatre was encouraging, due particularly to the patients’ status be- ing stable enough to be transferred to a fully equipped operating theatre. We emphasize the importance of emergency medicine education programmes on rapid diagnosis of traumatic injuries with early intervention, and adequate hemodynamic and respiratory support.(Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2002; 8: 78–82) Key words: emergency thoracotomy, blunt thoracic trauma Introduction aged nonoperatively with tube thoracotomy and general supportive treatment.