DOCSLIB.ORG

Guidelines for the Management of Severe Traumatic Brain Injury 4Th Edition

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Guidelines for the Management of Severe Traumatic Brain Injury 4Th Edition Guidelines for the Management of Severe Traumatic Brain Injury 4th Edition Nancy Carney, PhD Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR Annette M. Totten, PhD Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR Cindy O'Reilly, BS Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR Jamie S. Ullman, MD Hofstra North Shore-LIJ School of Medicine, Hempstead, NY Gregory W. J. Hawryluk, MD, PhD University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT Michael J. Bell, MD University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA Susan L. Bratton, MD University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT Randall Chesnut, MD University of Washington, Seattle, WA Odette A. Harris, MD, MPH Stanford University, Stanford, CA Niranjan Kissoon, MD University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC Andres M. Rubiano, MD El Bosque University, Bogota, Colombia; MEDITECH Foundation, Neiva, Colombia Lori Shutter, MD University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA Robert C. Tasker, MBBS, MD Harvard Medical School & Boston Children’s Hospital, Boston, MA Monica S. Vavilala, MD University of Washington, Seattle, WA Jack Wilberger, MD Drexel University, Pittsburgh, PA David W. Wright, MD Emory University, Atlanta, GA Jamshid Ghajar, MD, PhD Stanford University, Stanford, CA Reviewed for evidence-based integrity and endorsed by the American Association of Neurological Surgeons and the Congress of Neurological Surgeons. September 2016 TABLE OF CONTENTS PREFACE ...................................................................................................................................... 5 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS .............................................................................................................................................. 5 FUNDING SOURCE ...................................................................................................................................................... 6 DISCLAIMER OF LIABILITY ........................................................................................................................................ 6 CONFLICT OF INTEREST DISCLOSURE ........................................................................................................................ 7 AUTHORS’ PREFACE .................................................................................................................................................. 7 INTRODUCTION......................................................................................................................... 8 BRAIN TRAUMA RESEARCH: CURRENT CONDITIONS ................................................................................................. 8 THE BRAIN TRAUMA FOUNDATION’S POSITION ........................................................................................................ 9 THE BRAIN TRAUMA EVIDENCE-BASED CONSORTIUM ............................................................................................ 12 METHODS .................................................................................................................................. 14 SYSTEMATIC EVIDENCE REVIEW AND SYNTHESIS ................................................................................................... 14 DEVELOPMENT OF RECOMMENDATIONS .................................................................................................................. 22 EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, PART I: TREATMENTS ....... 25 1. DECOMPRESSIVE CRANIECTOMY ................................................................................................................... 26 2. PROPHYLACTIC HYPOTHERMIA ...................................................................................................................... 36 3. HYPEROSMOLAR THERAPY ............................................................................................................................ 49 4. CEREBROSPINAL FLUID DRAINAGE ................................................................................................................ 57 5. VENTILATION THERAPIES .............................................................................................................................. 62 6. ANESTHETICS, ANALGESICS, AND SEDATIVES ............................................................................................... 67 7. STEROIDS ....................................................................................................................................................... 76 8. NUTRITION ..................................................................................................................................................... 84 9. INFECTION PROPHYLAXIS............................................................................................................................... 99 10. DEEP VEIN THROMBOSIS PROPHYLAXIS ...................................................................................................... 111 11. SEIZURE PROPHYLAXIS ................................................................................................................................ 120 EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, PART II: MONITORING ... 130 12. INTRACRANIAL PRESSURE MONITORING ...................................................................................................... 132 13. CEREBRAL PERFUSION PRESSURE MONITORING .......................................................................................... 145 14. ADVANCED CEREBRAL MONITORING .......................................................................................................... 151 EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, PART III: THRESHOLDS .. 163 15. BLOOD PRESSURE THRESHOLDS .................................................................................................................. 164 16. INTRACRANIAL PRESSURE THRESHOLDS ...................................................................................................... 172 17. CEREBRAL PERFUSION PRESSURE THRESHOLDS .......................................................................................... 181 18. ADVANCED CEREBRAL MONITORING THRESHOLDS..................................................................................... 191 FUTURE RESEARCH ............................................................................................................. 201 TOPIC SELECTION AND REFINEMENT ..................................................................................................................... 201 METHODS—INDIVIDUAL STUDIES ......................................................................................................................... 202 METHODS—SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS AND GUIDELINES DEVELOPMENT .................................................................. 203 CONCLUSION ......................................................................................................................... 205 2 TABLES TABLE 1-1. QUALITY OF THE BODY OF EVIDENCE (DEPRESSIVE CRANIECTOMY) ................................................... 28 TABLE 1-2. SUMMARY OF EVIDENCE – CLASS 1 AND 2 STUDIES (DEPRESSIVE CRANIECTOMY) .............................. 29 TABLE 1-3. SUMMARY OF EVIDENCE – CLASS 3 STUDIES (DEPRESSIVE CRANIECTOMY) ........................................ 31 TABLE 2-1. QUALITY OF THE BODY OF EVIDENCE (PROPHYLACTIC HYPOTHERMIA) .............................................. 37 TABLE 2-2. SUMMARY OF EVIDENCE – CLASS 1 AND 2 STUDIES (PROPHYLACTIC HYPOTHERMIA) ......................... 39 TABLE 2-3. SUMMARY OF EVIDENCE–CLASS 3 STUDIES (PROPHYLACTIC HYPOTHERMIA) ..................................... 44 TABLE 3-1. QUALITY OF THE BODY OF EVIDENCE (HYPEROSMOLAR THERAPY) ..................................................... 51 TABLE 3-2. SUMMARY OF EVIDENCE - CLASS 2 (HYPEROSMOLAR THERAPY) ......................................................... 52 TABLE 3-3. SUMMARY OF EVIDENCE–CLASS 3 STUDIES (HYPEROSMOLAR THERAPY) ........................................... 54 TABLE 4-1. QUALITY OF THE BODY OF EVIDENCE (CEREBROSPINAL FLUID DRAINAGE)......................................... 58 TABLE 4-2. SUMMARY OF EVIDENCE – CLASS 3 STUDIES (CEREBROSPINAL FLUID DRAINAGE) ............................. 59 TABLE 5-1. QUALITY OF THE BODY OF EVIDENCE (VENTILATION THERAPIES) ....................................................... 64 TABLE 5-2. SUMMARY OF EVIDENCE (VENTILATION THERAPIES) ........................................................................... 65 TABLE 6-1. QUALITY OF THE BODY OF EVIDENCE (ANESTHETICS, ANALGESICS, AND SEDATIVES) ........................ 69 TABLE 6-2. SUMMARY OF EVIDENCE: CLASS 2 STUDIES (ANESTHETICS, ANALGESICS, AND SEDATIVES) ............... 70 TABLE 6-3. SUMMARY OF EVIDENCE: CLASS 3 STUDIES (ANESTHETICS, ANALGESICS, AND SEDATIVES) ............... 72 TABLE 7-1. QUALITY OF THE BODY OF EVIDENCE (STEROIDS) ................................................................................ 77 TABLE 7-2. SUMMARY OF EVIDENCE: CLASS 1 AND 2 STUDIES (STEROIDS) ............................................................ 78 TABLE 7-3. SUMMARY OF EVIDENCE: CLASS 3 STUDIES (STEROIDS) ...................................................................... 81 TABLE 8-1. QUALITY OF THE BODY OF EVIDENCE (NUTRITION) ............................................................................. 86 TABLE 8-2. SUMMARY OF EVIDENCE: CLASS 2 STUDIES (NUTRITION) .................................................................... 87 TABLE 8-3. SUMMARY OF EVIDENCE: CLASS 3 STUDIES (NUTRITION) ...................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Spinal Cord Injury and Traumatic Brain Injury Research Grant Program Report 2020
    This document is made available electronically by the Minnesota Legislative Reference Library as part of an ongoing digital archiving project. http://www.leg.state.mn.us/lrl/lrl.asp Spinal Cord Injury and Traumatic Brain Injury Research Grant Program Report January 15, 2020 Author About the Minnesota Office of Higher Education Alaina DeSalvo The Minnesota Office of Higher Education is a Competitive Grants Administrator cabinet-level state agency providing students with Tel: 651-259-3988 financial aid programs and information to help [email protected] them gain access to postsecondary education. The agency also serves as the state’s clearinghouse for data, research and analysis on postsecondary enrollment, financial aid, finance and trends. The Minnesota State Grant Program is the largest financial aid program administered by the Office of Higher Education, awarding up to $207 million in need-based grants to Minnesota residents attending eligible colleges, universities and career schools in Minnesota. The agency oversees other state scholarship programs, tuition reciprocity programs, a student loan program, Minnesota’s 529 College Savings Plan, licensing and early college awareness programs for youth. Minnesota Office of Higher Education 1450 Energy Park Drive, Suite 350 Saint Paul, MN 55108-5227 Tel: 651.642.0567 or 800.657.3866 TTY Relay: 800.627.3529 Fax: 651.642.0675 Email: [email protected] Table of Contents Introduction 1 Spinal Cord Injury and Traumatic Brain Injury Advisory Council 1 FY 2020 Proposal Solicitation Schedule
    [Show full text]
  • Brain Death and the Cervical Spinal Cord: a Confounding Factor for the Clinical Examination
    Spinal Cord (2010) 48, 2–9 & 2010 International Spinal Cord Society All rights reserved 1362-4393/10 $32.00 www.nature.com/sc REVIEW Brain death and the cervical spinal cord: a confounding factor for the clinical examination AR Joffe, N Anton and J Blackwood Department of Pediatrics, Stollery Children’s Hospital, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada Study design: This study is a systematic review. Objectives: Brain death (BD) is a clinical diagnosis, made by documenting absent brainstem functions, including unresponsive coma and apnea. Cervical spinal cord dysfunction would confound clinical diagnosis of BD. Our objective was to determine whether cervical spinal cord dysfunction is common in BD. Methods: A case of BD showing cervical cord compression on magnetic resonance imaging prompted a literature review from 1965 to 2008 for any reports of cervical spinal cord injury associated with brain herniation or BD. Results: A total of 12 cases of brain herniation in meningitis occurred shortly after a lumbar puncture with acute respiratory arrest and quadriplegia. In total, nine cases of acute brain herniation from various non-meningitis causes resulted in acute quadriplegia. The cases suggest that direct compression of the cervical spinal cord, or the anterior spinal arteries during cerebellar tonsillar herniation cause ischemic injury to the cord. No case series of brain herniation specifically mentioned spinal cord injury, but many survivors had severe disability including spastic limbs. Only two pathological series of BD examined the spinal cord; 56–100% of cases had upper cervical spinal cord damage, suggesting infarction from direct compression of the cord or its arterial blood supply.
    [Show full text]
  • Forensic Medicine
    YEREVAN STATE MEDICAL UNIVERSITY AFTER M. HERATSI DEPARTMENT OF Sh. Vardanyan K. Avagyan S. Hakobyan FORENSIC MEDICINE Handout for foreign students YEREVAN 2007 This handbook is adopted by the Methodical Council of Foreign Students of the University DEATH AND ITS CAUSES Thanatology deals with death in all its aspects. Death is of two types: (1) somatic, systemic or clinical, and (2) molecular or cellular. Somatic Death: It is the complete and irreversible stoppage of the circulation, respiration and brain functions, but there is no legal definition of death. THE MOMENT OF DEATH: Historically (medically and legally), the concept of death was that of "heart and respiration death", i.e. stoppage of spontaneous heart and breathing functions. Heart-lung bypass machines, mechanical respirators, and other devices, however have changed this medically in favor of a new concept "brain death", that is, irreversible loss of Cerebral function. Brain death is of three types: (1) Cortical or cerebral death with an intact brain stem. This produces a vegetative state in which respiration continues, but there is total loss of power of perception by the senses. This state of deep coma can be produced by cerebral hypoxia, toxic conditions or widespread brain injury. (2) Brain stem death, where the cerebrum may be intact, though cut off functionally by the stem lesion. The loss of the vital centers that control respiration, and of the ascending reticular activating system that sustains consciousness, cause the victim to be irreversibly comatose and incapable of spontaneous breathing. This can be produced by raised intracranial pressure, cerebral oedema, intracranial haemorrhage, etc.(3) Whole brain death (combination of 1 and 2).
    [Show full text]
  • Recognizing When a Child's Injury Or Illness Is Caused by Abuse
    U.S. Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Recognizing When a Child’s Injury or Illness Is Caused by Abuse PORTABLE GUIDE TO INVESTIGATING CHILD ABUSE U.S. Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs 810 Seventh Street NW. Washington, DC 20531 Eric H. Holder, Jr. Attorney General Karol V. Mason Assistant Attorney General Robert L. Listenbee Administrator Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Office of Justice Programs Innovation • Partnerships • Safer Neighborhoods www.ojp.usdoj.gov Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention www.ojjdp.gov The Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention is a component of the Office of Justice Programs, which also includes the Bureau of Justice Assistance; the Bureau of Justice Statistics; the National Institute of Justice; the Office for Victims of Crime; and the Office of Sex Offender Sentencing, Monitoring, Apprehending, Registering, and Tracking. Recognizing When a Child’s Injury or Illness Is Caused by Abuse PORTABLE GUIDE TO INVESTIGATING CHILD ABUSE NCJ 243908 JULY 2014 Contents Could This Be Child Abuse? ..............................................................................................1 Caretaker Assessment ......................................................................................................2 Injury Assessment ............................................................................................................4 Ruling Out a Natural Phenomenon or Medical Conditions
    [Show full text]
  • Coma Stimulation: Suggested Activities
    Coma stimulation: suggested activities Headway’s publications are all available to freely download from the information library on the charity’s website, while individuals and families can request hard copies of the booklets via the helpline. As a charity, we rely on donations from people like you to continue providing free information to people affected by brain injury. Donate today: www.headway.org.uk/donate. Introduction It is quite common for family members to feel ‘useless’ when a relative is in a coma, and to be desperate to do something to help. A coma stimulation programme (sometimes called a coma arousal programme) is an approach based on stimulating the unconscious person’s senses of hearing, touch, smell, taste and vision individually in order to help their recovery. There is still controversy over how effective it is to try to stimulate a person in coma. However, most would say that such programmes have some beneficial effect, even if only to provide something constructive for the family to do. It is very important that the activities used would have been enjoyable for the patient before the injury. For example, only play music they like and talk to them about subjects they are interested in. Try not to do anything for too long in order to avoid tiring the person out. A stimulation programme must only be started after discussion with the clinical staff, who will advise you what might be appropriate at any particular stage in the recovery process. Activity suggestions Here are some examples of activities that could form part of a coma stimulation programme: • Make sure that a few friends and family members visit regularly, rather than in large groups at a time.
    [Show full text]
  • A Rare Case of Penetrating Trauma of Frontal Sinus with Anterior Table Fracture Himanshu Raval1*, Mona Bhatt2 and Nihar Gaur3
    ISSN: 2643-4474 Raval et al. Neurosurg Cases Rev 2020, 3:046 DOI: 10.23937/2643-4474/1710046 Volume 3 | Issue 2 Neurosurgery - Cases and Reviews Open Access CASE REPORT Case Report: A Rare Case of Penetrating Trauma of Frontal Sinus with Anterior Table Fracture Himanshu Raval1*, Mona Bhatt2 and Nihar Gaur3 1 Department of Neurosurgery, NHL Municipal Medical College, SVP Hospital Campus, Gujarat, India Check for updates 2Medical Officer, CHC Dolasa, Gujarat, India 3GAIMS-GK General Hospital, Gujarat, India *Corresponding author: Dr. Himanshu Raval, Resident, Department of Neurosurgery, NHL Municipal Medical College, SVP Hospital Campus, Elisbridge, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, 380006, India, Tel: 942-955-3329 Abstract Introduction Background: Head injury is common component of any Road traffic accident (RTA) is the most common road traffic accident injury. Injury involving only frontal sinus cause of cranio-facial injury and involvement of frontal is uncommon and unique as its management algorithm is bone fractures are rare and constitute 5-9% of only fa- changing over time with development of radiological modal- ities as well as endoscopic intervention. Frontal sinus inju- cial trauma. The degree of association has been report- ries may range from isolated anterior table fractures causing ed to be 95% with fractures of the anterior table or wall a simple aesthetic deformity to complex fractures involving of the frontal sinuses, 60% with the orbital rims, and the frontal recess, orbits, skull base, and intracranial con- 60% with complex injuries of the naso-orbital-ethmoid tents. Only anterior table injury of frontal sinus is rare in pen- region, 33% with other orbital wall fractures and 27% etrating head injury without underlying brain injury with his- tory of unconsciousness and questionable convulsion which with Le Fort level fractures.
    [Show full text]
  • Traumatic Brain Injury
    REPORT TO CONGRESS Traumatic Brain Injury In the United States: Epidemiology and Rehabilitation Submitted by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention National Center for Injury Prevention and Control Division of Unintentional Injury Prevention The Report to Congress on Traumatic Brain Injury in the United States: Epidemiology and Rehabilitation is a publication of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), in collaboration with the National Institutes of Health (NIH). Centers for Disease Control and Prevention National Center for Injury Prevention and Control Thomas R. Frieden, MD, MPH Director, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Debra Houry, MD, MPH Director, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control Grant Baldwin, PhD, MPH Director, Division of Unintentional Injury Prevention The inclusion of individuals, programs, or organizations in this report does not constitute endorsement by the Federal government of the United States or the Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS). Suggested Citation: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2015). Report to Congress on Traumatic Brain Injury in the United States: Epidemiology and Rehabilitation. National Center for Injury Prevention and Control; Division of Unintentional Injury Prevention. Atlanta, GA. Executive Summary . 1 Introduction. 2 Classification . 2 Public Health Impact . 2 TBI Health Effects . 3 Effectiveness of TBI Outcome Measures . 3 Contents Factors Influencing Outcomes . 4 Effectiveness of TBI Rehabilitation . 4 Cognitive Rehabilitation . 5 Physical Rehabilitation . 5 Recommendations . 6 Conclusion . 9 Background . 11 Introduction . 12 Purpose . 12 Method . 13 Section I: Epidemiology and Consequences of TBI in the United States . 15 Definition of TBI . 15 Characteristics of TBI . 16 Injury Severity Classification of TBI . 17 Health and Other Effects of TBI .
    [Show full text]
  • Early Management of Retained Hemothorax in Blunt Head and Chest Trauma
    World J Surg https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-017-4420-x ORIGINAL SCIENTIFIC REPORT Early Management of Retained Hemothorax in Blunt Head and Chest Trauma 1,2 1,8 1,7 1 Fong-Dee Huang • Wen-Bin Yeh • Sheng-Shih Chen • Yuan-Yuarn Liu • 1 1,3,6 4,5 I-Yin Lu • Yi-Pin Chou • Tzu-Chin Wu Ó The Author(s) 2018. This article is an open access publication Abstract Background Major blunt chest injury usually leads to the development of retained hemothorax and pneumothorax, and needs further intervention. However, since blunt chest injury may be combined with blunt head injury that typically requires patient observation for 3–4 days, other critical surgical interventions may be delayed. The purpose of this study is to analyze the outcomes of head injury patients who received early, versus delayed thoracic surgeries. Materials and methods From May 2005 to February 2012, 61 patients with major blunt injuries to the chest and head were prospectively enrolled. These patients had an intracranial hemorrhage without indications of craniotomy. All the patients received video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) due to retained hemothorax or pneumothorax. Patients were divided into two groups according to the time from trauma to operation, this being within 4 days for Group 1 and more than 4 days for Group 2. The clinical outcomes included hospital length of stay (LOS), intensive care unit (ICU) LOS, infection rates, and the time period of ventilator use and chest tube intubation. Result All demographics, including age, gender, and trauma severity between the two groups showed no statistical differences.
    [Show full text]
  • What to Expect After Having a Subarachnoid Hemorrhage (SAH) Information for Patients and Families Table of Contents
    What to expect after having a subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) Information for patients and families Table of contents What is a subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH)? .......................................... 3 What are the signs that I may have had an SAH? .................................. 4 How did I get this aneurysm? ..................................................................... 4 Why do aneurysms need to be treated?.................................................... 4 What is an angiogram? .................................................................................. 5 How are aneurysms repaired? ..................................................................... 6 What are common complications after having an SAH? ..................... 8 What is vasospasm? ...................................................................................... 8 What is hydrocephalus? ............................................................................... 10 What is hyponatremia? ................................................................................ 12 What happens as I begin to get better? .................................................... 13 What can I expect after I leave the hospital? .......................................... 13 How will the SAH change my health? ........................................................ 14 Will the SAH cause any long-term effects? ............................................. 14 How will my emotions be affected? .......................................................... 15 When should
    [Show full text]
  • The Quest for the Origin and Prevention of Postoperative Myalgia Following Succinylcholine : New Insights in an Old Problem
    The quest for the origin and prevention of postoperative myalgia following succinylcholine : new insights in an old problem Citation for published version (APA): Schreiber, J-U. (2010). The quest for the origin and prevention of postoperative myalgia following succinylcholine : new insights in an old problem. Datawyse / Universitaire Pers Maastricht. https://doi.org/10.26481/dis.20100702js Document status and date: Published: 01/01/2010 DOI: 10.26481/dis.20100702js Document Version: Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Please check the document version of this publication: • A submitted manuscript is the version of the article upon submission and before peer-review. There can be important differences between the submitted version and the official published version of record. People interested in the research are advised to contact the author for the final version of the publication, or visit the DOI to the publisher's website. • The final author version and the galley proof are versions of the publication after peer review. • The final published version features the final layout of the paper including the volume, issue and page numbers. Link to publication General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. • Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. • You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain • You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal.
    [Show full text]
  • Function and Biomarkers of the Blood-Brain Barrier in a Neonatal Germinal Matrix Haemorrhage Model
    cells Article Function and Biomarkers of the Blood-Brain Barrier in a Neonatal Germinal Matrix Haemorrhage Model Erik Axel Andersson 1 , Eridan Rocha-Ferreira 2 , Henrik Hagberg 2, Carina Mallard 1 and Carl Joakim Ek 1,* 1 Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Medicinaregatan 11, 413 90 Gothenburg, Sweden; [email protected] (E.A.A.); [email protected] (C.M.) 2 Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, 413 90 Gothenburg, Sweden; [email protected] (E.R.-F.); [email protected] (H.H.) * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: Germinal matrix haemorrhage (GMH), caused by rupturing blood vessels in the germinal matrix, is a prevalent driver of preterm brain injuries and death. Our group recently developed a model simulating GMH using intrastriatal injections of collagenase in 5-day-old rats, which corresponds to the brain development of human preterm infants. This study aimed to define changes to the blood-brain barrier (BBB) and to evaluate BBB proteins as biomarkers in this GMH model. Regional BBB functions were investigated using blood to brain 14C-sucrose uptake as well as using biotinylated BBB tracers. Blood plasma and cerebrospinal fluids were collected at various times after GMH and analysed with ELISA for OCLN and CLDN5. The immunoreactivity of BBB proteins was assessed in brain sections. Tracer experiments showed that GMH produced a defined region surrounding the hematoma where many vessels lost their integrity. This region expanded for at least 6 h following GMH, thereafter resolution of both hematoma and re-establishment of BBB Citation: Andersson, E.A.; Rocha- Ferreira, E.; Hagberg, H.; Mallard, C.; function occurred.
    [Show full text]
  • Delayed Traumatic Hemothorax in Older Adults
    Open access Brief report Trauma Surg Acute Care Open: first published as 10.1136/tsaco-2020-000626 on 8 March 2021. Downloaded from Complication to consider: delayed traumatic hemothorax in older adults Jeff Choi ,1 Ananya Anand ,1 Katherine D Sborov,2 William Walton,3 Lawrence Chow,4 Oscar Guillamondegui,5 Bradley M Dennis,5 David Spain,1 Kristan Staudenmayer1 ► Additional material is ABSTRACT very small hemothoraces rarely require interven- published online only. To view, Background Emerging evidence suggests older adults tion whereas larger hemothoraces often undergo please visit the journal online immediate drainage. However, emerging evidence (http:// dx. doi. org/ 10. 1136/ may experience subtle hemothoraces that progress tsaco- 2020- 000626). over several days. Delayed progression and delayed suggests HTX in older adults with rib fractures may development of traumatic hemothorax (dHTX) have not experience subtle hemothoraces that progress in a 1Surgery, Stanford University, been well characterized. We hypothesized dHTX would delayed fashion over several days.1 2 If true, older Stanford, California, USA be infrequent but associated with factors that may aid adults may be at risk of developing empyema or 2Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee, prediction. other complications without close monitoring. USA Methods We retrospectively reviewed adults aged ≥50 Delayed progression and delayed development of 3Radiology, Vanderbilt University years diagnosed with dHTX after rib fractures at two traumatic hemothorax (dHTX) have not been well Medical Center, Nashville, level 1 trauma centers (March 2018 to September 2019). characterized in literature. The ageing US popula- Tennessee, USA tion and increasing incidence of rib fractures among 4Radiology, Stanford University, dHTX was defined as HTX discovered ≥48 hours after Stanford, California, USA admission chest CT showed either no or ’minimal/trace’ older adults underscore a pressing need for better 5Department of Surgery, HTX.
    [Show full text]